Who were the standout players in the 2023 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament. How did UConn’s dominant run impact the All-Tournament selections. Which unexpected stars emerged during March Madness.
UConn’s Championship Run and Its Impact on All-Tournament Selections
The 2023 NCAA men’s basketball tournament concluded with the UConn Huskies claiming their fifth national title since 1999. Their dominant 76-59 victory over San Diego State in the championship game capped off an impressive run through the tournament field. UConn’s success naturally influenced the All-Tournament team selections, with several Huskies players earning recognition for their outstanding performances.
To be considered for the All-Tournament team, players had to reach at least the Elite Eight, with first-team honors reserved for those who made it to the Final Four. This criteria ensures that the selected players not only performed well individually but also contributed significantly to their team’s success in the tournament.
Second Team Standouts: Unsung Heroes of March Madness
Markquis Nowell: Kansas State’s Dynamic Point Guard
Markquis Nowell, the 5’7″ point guard from Kansas State, left an indelible mark on the 2023 tournament. His performances were nothing short of spectacular, averaging 23.5 points and 13.5 assists per game. Nowell’s most memorable moment came in the Sweet 16 against Michigan State, where he set an NCAA tournament record with 19 assists in an overtime victory.
Drew Timme: Gonzaga’s Consistent Force
Despite a challenging Elite Eight game against UConn, Drew Timme’s overall tournament performance was impressive. The 6’10” forward averaged 24.3 points and 9.3 assists through four games. His standout performance came in the Sweet 16 against UCLA, where he recorded 36 points and 13 rebounds, showcasing his dominance on both ends of the court.
Ryan Kalkbrenner: Creighton’s Towering Presence
Ryan Kalkbrenner, Creighton’s 7’0″ junior center, made his presence felt throughout the tournament. His first-round performance against NC State was particularly noteworthy, as he scored 31 points on 11-of-14 shooting while adding seven rebounds and three blocks. Kalkbrenner’s consistency was evident in his tournament averages of 20.0 points on 60.4 percent shooting across four games.
Nijel Pack: Miami’s Sharpshooter
Nijel Pack’s contributions were crucial to Miami’s tournament run, particularly in their upset win against No. 1 seed Houston in the Sweet 16. In that game, Pack connected on 7-of-10 three-point attempts, finishing with 26 points. Throughout the tournament, he averaged 16.4 points per game while shooting an impressive 45.5% from beyond the arc.
Marcus Carr: Texas’ Reliable Leader
As the last team standing from the top two seed lines, Texas relied heavily on Marcus Carr’s leadership and consistent play. Carr averaged 15.5 points, 4.8 assists, and 2.5 rebounds per game while shooting 45% from three-point range. His all-around contributions were instrumental in guiding the Longhorns to the Elite Eight.
First Team Selections: The Elite of March Madness
Lamont Butler: San Diego State’s Clutch Performer
Lamont Butler etched his name in March Madness lore with his game-winning buzzer-beater against Florida Atlantic in the Final Four. However, Butler’s contributions extended far beyond that single moment. The 6’6″ guard averaged 10.5 points, 3.3 rebounds, 3.3 assists, and 1.2 steals across six tournament games. His defensive prowess was a key factor in San Diego State’s surprising run to the championship game.
Alijah Martin: Florida Atlantic’s Cinderella Story
Florida Atlantic’s improbable Final Four run was fueled by a balanced team effort, but Alijah Martin emerged as a standout performer. The 6’2″ guard saved his best for last, scoring a team-high 17 points against Kansas State in the Elite Eight and exploding for 26 points against San Diego State in the Final Four. Martin’s tournament averages of 15.2 points and 4.4 rebounds per game were crucial to the Owls’ success.
Jordan Miller: Miami’s Unsung Hero
While teammates Isaiah Wong and Nijel Pack often garnered more attention, Jordan Miller’s consistent play was instrumental in Miami’s Final Four run. Miller’s efficiency was remarkable, as he shot 73.7% from the field and 90.9% from the free-throw line during the tournament. His 27-point performance on perfect 7-of-7 shooting against Texas in the Elite Eight was a testament to his importance to the Hurricanes.
The Impact of Tournament Performance on NBA Draft Stock
The NCAA tournament often serves as a platform for players to elevate their NBA draft stock. Strong performances on the national stage can significantly influence scouts’ perceptions and potentially lead to improved draft positions. This year’s tournament was no exception, with several players using the spotlight to showcase their skills and potential at the next level.
For example, Adama Sanogo’s dominant performances throughout UConn’s championship run likely improved his draft stock. His ability to dominate in the paint against high-level competition demonstrated his readiness for the professional game. Similarly, Jordan Hawkins’ sharpshooting and clutch play may have solidified his position as a potential first-round pick.
On the other hand, players from smaller schools like San Diego State’s Lamont Butler and Florida Atlantic’s Alijah Martin used the tournament to gain national recognition. Their performances against top-tier competition showed that they could compete at a high level, potentially opening doors for professional opportunities that may not have existed before the tournament.
The Role of Coaching in Tournament Success
While individual player performances often take center stage during March Madness, the importance of coaching cannot be overstated. The tournament’s single-elimination format puts immense pressure on coaches to make quick adjustments and strategic decisions that can make the difference between advancing and going home.
UConn’s Dan Hurley demonstrated masterful coaching throughout the tournament, consistently putting his players in positions to succeed and making crucial in-game adjustments. His ability to maintain the team’s focus and intensity throughout their dominant run was a key factor in their championship victory.
Similarly, San Diego State’s Brian Dutcher and Florida Atlantic’s Dusty May garnered national attention for their ability to guide their respective teams to unexpected Final Four appearances. Their success highlighted the importance of preparation, adaptability, and motivation in achieving tournament success, regardless of a program’s size or reputation.
The Evolution of March Madness: Trends and Statistics
The 2023 NCAA tournament provided a wealth of data and trends that offer insights into the evolving nature of college basketball. One notable trend was the increased importance of three-point shooting, with teams like UConn and Miami using their perimeter prowess to great effect.
Another significant trend was the success of defensive-minded teams. San Diego State’s run to the championship game was built on their suffocating defense, which held high-powered offenses like Alabama and Creighton in check. This success may influence future recruiting and strategic approaches for programs looking to make deep tournament runs.
The tournament also saw a continuation of the trend towards position-less basketball, with versatile players like UConn’s Andre Jackson Jr. and Miami’s Jordan Miller showcasing their ability to impact the game in multiple ways. This trend reflects the changing nature of the sport at both the collegiate and professional levels.
The Impact of NIL on College Basketball and March Madness
The 2023 tournament was one of the first to fully feel the effects of the new Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rules in college sports. These changes have had a significant impact on the landscape of college basketball, influencing recruiting, player retention, and even tournament performance.
Some argue that NIL opportunities have helped level the playing field, allowing smaller schools to compete for top talent by offering unique marketing opportunities. This may have contributed to the success of programs like Florida Atlantic, who were able to build a deep and talented roster capable of competing with traditional powerhouses.
However, the full impact of NIL on college basketball and March Madness is still unfolding. As players and schools continue to navigate this new landscape, it will be interesting to see how it shapes future tournaments and the overall competitive balance of college basketball.
The Future of March Madness: Expansion and Innovation
As college basketball continues to evolve, so too does the NCAA tournament. There have been ongoing discussions about potentially expanding the tournament field, with some advocating for a 96-team format. Proponents argue that this would provide more opportunities for mid-major programs and create even more excitement and unpredictability.
Additionally, the success of the First Four games in recent years has led to considerations of expanding this play-in round. This could potentially create more drama and storylines in the early stages of the tournament.
Technological innovations are also shaping the future of March Madness. Enhanced broadcast technologies, virtual reality experiences, and improved statistical analysis are all changing how fans engage with the tournament. These advancements could lead to more immersive viewing experiences and provide deeper insights into the games and players.
As the tournament continues to grow in popularity and significance, it’s likely that we’ll see further innovations and changes in the coming years. However, the core elements that make March Madness so compelling – the drama, the upsets, and the emergence of unexpected heroes – are likely to remain at the heart of the event.
The Global Impact of March Madness
While March Madness is primarily an American phenomenon, its influence extends far beyond U.S. borders. The tournament has become a global showcase for basketball talent, attracting players from around the world to compete at the highest level of college basketball.
This international flavor was evident in the 2023 tournament, with players like UConn’s Adama Sanogo (Mali) and Andre Jackson Jr. (Dominican Republic) playing crucial roles in their team’s championship run. The success of these international players not only enhances the quality of play but also helps to grow the game’s popularity worldwide.
Furthermore, the tournament serves as a scouting ground for professional leagues around the world, not just the NBA. Strong performances in March Madness can open doors for players to pursue professional careers in Europe, Asia, and other international leagues.
As college basketball continues to attract talent from around the globe, it’s likely that we’ll see an even more diverse and internationally representative tournament in the years to come. This global appeal not only enhances the quality of play but also contributes to the tournament’s growing worldwide audience and cultural significance.
The Economic Impact of March Madness
Beyond its sporting significance, March Madness has become a major economic event. The tournament generates billions of dollars in revenue through television rights, ticket sales, merchandise, and advertising. This economic impact extends to the host cities, which see significant boosts in tourism and local business activity during the tournament.
The 2023 tournament was particularly significant as it represented a full return to normalcy following the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Packed arenas and robust viewership numbers demonstrated the enduring popularity of the event and its importance to the sports economy.
Moreover, the tournament’s economic influence extends to the participating schools. Success in March Madness can lead to increased donations, higher application rates, and enhanced brand recognition for universities. This “Flutie Effect,” named after the boost Boston College received following Doug Flutie’s famous Hail Mary pass in 1984, underscores the far-reaching implications of tournament success.
As the tournament continues to grow in popularity and reach, its economic impact is likely to increase. This could lead to further investments in college basketball programs, improved facilities, and enhanced experiences for fans and players alike.
The Cultural Significance of March Madness
March Madness has transcended its status as a mere sporting event to become a significant cultural phenomenon. The tournament captivates the nation for three weeks each spring, dominating conversations, media coverage, and social media interactions.
One of the most notable cultural aspects of March Madness is the tradition of bracket predictions. Millions of people, many of whom may not follow college basketball closely throughout the year, participate in bracket challenges. This widespread engagement creates a shared experience that brings together fans and casual observers alike.
The tournament also serves as a platform for storytelling, with each year bringing new narratives of underdogs, clutch performances, and heartbreaking defeats. These stories often resonate beyond the world of sports, touching on themes of perseverance, teamwork, and the pursuit of dreams.
Furthermore, March Madness has become a celebration of college athletics and the unique atmosphere of campus sports. The passion of student sections, the traditions of different schools, and the raw emotion on display all contribute to the tournament’s distinctive character.
As March Madness continues to evolve, its cultural significance is likely to grow. The tournament’s ability to create shared experiences, inspire passion, and showcase the best of collegiate athletics ensures its place as a beloved American tradition.
The Legacy of March Madness: Creating Lifelong Memories
For players, coaches, and fans alike, March Madness creates memories that last a lifetime. The 2023 tournament added another chapter to this rich legacy, with moments that will be remembered for years to come.
For the UConn Huskies, their dominant run to the national championship will be etched in program history. Players like Adama Sanogo and Jordan Hawkins have cemented their places in UConn lore, joining the ranks of past Husky greats who have led the team to national titles.
For Cinderella stories like Florida Atlantic, their improbable run to the Final Four will be remembered as one of the great underdog tales in tournament history. The memories created during their journey will inspire future generations of players and fans at the school.
Even for teams that fell short of their ultimate goal, the tournament provided moments of triumph and growth. The experience of competing on the national stage, the bonds formed with teammates, and the lessons learned in victory and defeat all contribute to the lasting impact of March Madness.
As we look back on the 2023 tournament and forward to future editions of March Madness, it’s clear that the event’s ability to create these enduring memories is at the heart of its enduring appeal. Each year brings new stories, new heroes, and new moments that capture the imagination and inspire the next generation of players and fans.
The All-Tournament team selections for 2023 represent not just individual excellence, but the collective narratives that made this year’s March Madness another unforgettable chapter in the annals of college basketball. As we celebrate these outstanding performers, we also celebrate the tournament itself – a unique and beloved institution that continues to captivate and inspire year after year.
Men’s March Madness 2023: The All-Tournament Team After the National Championship | News, Scores, Highlights, Stats, and Rumors
- Facebook Logo
- Twitter Logo
- Copy Link Icon
Joel ReuterApril 4, 2023
Men’s March Madness 2023: The All-Tournament Team After the National Championship
0 of 6
- Brett Wilhelm/NCAA Photos via Getty Images
The 2023 NCAA men’s tournament is over, and the UConn Huskies are national champions.
Their run of dominance through the tournament field continued on Monday night with a dominant 76-59 victory over San Diego State. It is the Huskies fifth national title since they hoisted their first banner in 1999.
With March Madness over, it’s now time to pick our All-Tournament Team, with five first-team and five second-team spots up for grabs.
To be considered for inclusion, a player had to have reached the Elite Eight, and first-team honors were reserved for players who appeared in the Final Four.
Let the debate begin!
Second Team
1 of 6
- Markquis NowellBen Solomon/NCAA Photos via Getty Images
Markquis Nowell, Kansas State
Nowell averaged 23.5 points and 13.5 assists while setting an NCAA tournament record with 19 assists in an overtime win against Michigan State in the Sweet 16. The 5’7″ point guard shot just 8-of-21 from the floor against Florida Atlantic in the Elite Eight but still finished with 30 points, 12 assists and five steals.
Drew Timme, Gonzaga
Timme got into foul trouble against UConn in the Elite Eight and finished with just 12 points on 5-of-14 shooting, but even with that down game, his overall tournament numbers were still excellent for the second successive year. The 6’10” forward averaged 24.3 points and 9.3 assists through four games, and his 36-point, 13-rebound performance against UCLA in the Sweet 16 was one of the best individual performances of the tournament.
Ryan Kalkbrenner, Creighton
Kalkbrenner had perhaps the best first-round performance of any player in this year’s tournament, lighting up NC State for 31 points on 11-of-14 shooting while adding seven rebounds and three blocks.
The 7’0″ junior averaged 20.0 points on 60.4 percent shooting in his four tournament games.
Nijel Pack, Miami
Pack led the charge in Miami’s upset win against No. 1 seed Houston in the Sweet 16, knocking down 7-of-10 three-point attempts on his way to 26 points. He scored just 23 points combined against Texas and UConn in the Hurricanes’ next two games, but he still averaged 16.4 points while connecting on 15-of-33 attempts from beyond the arc.
Marcus Carr, Texas
Carr averaged 15.5 points, 4.8 assists and 2.5 rebounds while connecting on 9-of-20 from distance in four NCAA tournament games, and he was the best player on the Texas roster all season. The Longhorns ended up being the last team standing from the top two seed lines with their trip to the Elite Eight.
Lamont Butler, San Diego State
2 of 6
- AP Photo/David J. Phillip
Why not reward the player who hit the biggest shot of the tournament with first-team honors?
Lamont Butler drilled the game-winning buzzer-beater against Florida Atlantic in the Final Four to punch the Aztecs’ ticket to the title game, but that was far from his only contributions to the team’s surprise title game run.
The 6’6″ guard averaged 10.5 points, 3.3 rebounds, 3.3 assists and 1.2 steals in six tournament games, including a team-high 18 points against Creighton in the Elite Eight and 13 points on 5-of-11 shooting in the championship game.
The Mountain West All-Defensive team pick was also an integral part of the Aztecs’ smothering defense, which keyed their upset victories over high-powered Alabama and Creighton teams on the road to the Final Four.
Alijah Martin, Florida Atlantic
3 of 6
- Gregory Shamus/Getty Images
The Florida Atlantic Owls were the 2023 NCAA tournament’s biggest Cinderella story, reaching the Final Four on the strength of a deep nine-man rotation that did not rely on any one go-to scorer.
Johnell Davis stole the headlines early with a 29-point, 12-rebound, five-assist, five-steal game against Fairleigh Dickinson in the second round, but it was Alijah Davis who shouldered the scoring load after the opening weekend.
The 6’2″ guard had a team-high 17 points against Kansas State in the Elite Eight. He then exploded for 26 points against San Diego State in the Final Four, with 19 coming in the second half when the Owls briefly built a 14-point lead.
He entered the NCAA tournament with as much momentum as anyone after a season-high 30 points against UAB in the Conference USA tournament title game, and he wrapped up his first March Madness with averages of 15.2 points and 4.4 rebounds.
Jordan Miller, Miami
4 of 6
- Jamie Schwaberow/NCAA Photos via Getty Images
The Miami Hurricanes don’t reach the Final Four without Jordan Miller.
The 6’6″ guard found nothing but the bottom of the net in the team’s comeback win against Texas in the Elite Eight, hitting on 7-of-7 from the floor and 13-of-13 from the free-throw line for a season-high 27 points.
After a forgettable seven-point performance against Drake in the first round, Miller settled in as a reliable scoring option, averaging 15.
4 points, 6.4 rebounds and 2.4 assists while also adding six blocks and two steals.
The George Mason transfer wrapped up his fifth collegiate season and second year at Miami averaging 15.3 points, 6.2 rebounds and 2.7 assists, and with his strong March showing, he may have played his way into the second-round conversation in the upcoming NBA draft.
Jordan Hawkins, UConn
5 of 6
- AP Photo/David J. Phillip
Jordan Hawkins has scored in double-figures and knocked down at least three three-pointers in each of UConn’s first five games in the NCAA tournament, providing crucial perimeter scoring to help open things up for Adama Sanogo on the inside.
Hawkins has a bright NBA future thanks to his shooting ability, and it was on full display against Gonzaga in the Elite Eight.
The 6’5″ guard buried 6-of-10 attempts from beyond the arc en route to 20 points in a blowout win against the Bulldogs, and that came after he torched Arkansas for 24 points on only 13 shot attempts in 28 minutes.
All told, he averaged 16.3 points on 21-of-42 shooting from three-point range in six tournament games, and there is little doubt scouts have taken notice of his sharpshooting abilities.
Adama Sanogo, UConn
6 of 6
- Gregory Shamus/Getty Images
Adama Sanogo did a little bit of everything in UConn’s victory over Miami in the Final Four, finishing with 21 points, 10 rebounds, two blocks and even a pair of made three-pointers to bring his season total to 19.
The 6’9″, 240-pound forward had his way inside against Norchad Omier to win an important individual battle and propel the Huskies to the national championship game.
He followed that up with a 17-points, 10-rebound performance on Monday night to clinch Most Outstanding Player honors for the 2023 NCAA tournament. It was his fourth double-double of the tournament, and he did it on just nine shot attempts while also playing stellar interior defense.
Sanogo was a force all tournament, averaging 19.
7 points, 9.8 rebounds and 1.3 blocks while shooting 66.7 percent from the floor, and those numbers would look even more efficient with a 3-of-11 shooting performance against Gonzaga removed from the equation.
While the game has become more and more perimeter-oriented over the years, Sanogo has proven that a team can still ride a go-to big man offensively all the way to the national championship game.
NCAA Tournament 2023: The All-Tournament Team Ahead of the Sweet 16 | News, Scores, Highlights, Stats, and Rumors
- Facebook Logo
- Twitter Logo
- Copy Link Icon
David KenyonFeatured Columnist IVMarch 22, 2023
NCAA Tournament 2023: The All-Tournament Team Ahead of the Sweet 16
0 of 6
- Drew TimmeJustin Edmonds/Getty Images
Four days of clutch shots, upsets and general mayhem enveloped the opening rounds of the 2023 men’s NCAA tournament, and the days leading up to the Sweet 16 provide a chance to reset all the action.
By this point, you probably know the teams. Top seeds Alabama and Houston headline the remaining field, which includes Cinderella stories Florida Atlantic and Princeton. And there are well-known programs—Gonzaga, Michigan State and UCLA, among them—in between.
Because of the nonstop action, however, you might’ve missed the best players of the tournament so far.
Since we’re only through the first weekend, a couple of standout individuals are included in spite of their team suffering a loss. Each player at least advanced to the second round, though.
The selections are subjective to a degree but lean heavily on box-score production while considering key in-game contributions.
Second Team
1 of 6
- AP Photo/Michael Conroy
Johnell Davis, Florida Atlantic
Johnell Davis scored 10 of his 12 points in the second half of FAU’s win over Memphis, including clutch three-pointers on back-to-back possessions late in the game.
Then, he racked up 29 points, 12 rebounds, five assists and five steals to end Fairleigh Dickinson’s Cinderella story.
Davonte Davis, Arkansas
Arkansas has leaned on Davonte Davis, a standout defender who provided 16 points, six rebounds and four steals in the opener against Illinois. Three of his four steals immediately led to a bucket. Davis followed that performance up with 25 points and eight rebounds in the upset of top-seeded Kansas. So far, he’s shot a terrific 16-of-29 from the floor.
Mike Miles Jr., TCU
TCU’s tourney is over after falling to Gonzaga in the second round. Mike Miles Jr., though, assembled an excellent two-game run. He tallied 26 points and three assists to lead TCU past Arizona State and provided 24 points with four assists and two steals against Gonzaga.
Anton Watson, Gonzaga
Speaking of the Zags: Who doesn’t love a glue guy? Anton Watson is a critical part of the program’s success. Through two games, he’s registered 23 points and 23 rebounds—including 11 offensive boards—with seven assists, five steals and two blocks.
Dylan Disu, Texas
One of two players with a double-double in both rounds, Dylan Disu played a leading role in the Longhorns’ second-round win. He overwhelmed Penn State with 28 points on 14-of-20 shooting, adding 10 rebounds and two steals. Disu also netted 17 points and grabbed 10 boards in the earlier victory over Colgate.
First Team: Markquis Nowell, Kansas State
2 of 6
- Jacob Kupferman/Getty Images
Given he stands just 5’7″, Markquis Nowell carries the label of being an “undersized” player.
Another label? All-American.
As he did throughout the regular season, the playmaking guard has shown off his two-way excellence in March Madness. Nowell torched Montana State for 17 points and 14 assists before ripping Kentucky’s defense apart to the tune of 27 points and nine assists. Along with burying six of 14 threes, he’s nabbed three steals in each game.
Nowell has vaulted K-State to only its third Sweet 16 appearance in the last three-plus decades.
First Team: Drew Timme, Gonzaga
3 of 6
- Jamie Schwaberow/NCAA Photos via Getty Images
From a roster-construction perspective, the remainder of the list is nonsensical. However, since we’re not building a rotation, we’re not plugging guards into a predetermined spot over a more deserving forward or center.
And so, welcome back, Drew Timme!
The longtime Gonzaga star, a B/R first-team member of the 2021 tournament, has surged to another strong start. Timme put up 21 points on Grand Canyon and netted 28 against TCU, and he had a combined 14 rebounds, six assists and four blocks in those victories.
Timme’s next challenge is opposite UCLA, against whom he’s scored 25 and 18 points in two previous games.
First Team: Adama Sanogo, UConn
4 of 6
- C. Morgan Engel/NCAA Photos via Getty Images
In a word: Whew.
Connecticut’s physical forward has straight-up dominated in victories over Iona and Saint Mary’s.
During the opening win, Adama Sanogo shot 13-of-17 for 28 points and secured 13 rebounds. Then, against an elite Saint Mary’s defense, he finished 11-of-16 with 24 points and eight rebounds. He also blocked a shot in both games.
Heading into the Sweet 16, Sanogo has a tournament-best 72.7 field-goal percentage among players with 20-plus shots.
First Team: Trayce Jackson-Davis, Indiana
5 of 6
- C. Morgan Engel/NCAA Photos via Getty Images
Although he assuredly won’t remain a first-team choice, Trayce Jackson-Davis absolutely deserves a place right now.
During the opening round, TJD overpowered Kent State with 24 points on 10-of-17 shooting and corralled 11 rebounds. He also dished five assists and swatted five shots in the win.
Miami eliminated the Hoosiers in the next round, but Jackson-Davis is the reason they had a chance. He tallied 23 points on 7-of-10 shooting, buried nine of his 11 free throws, grabbed eight rebounds and blocked five more shots in what was likely the final game of his IU career.
Jackson-Davis has since informally declared for the 2023 NBA draft.
First Team: Oscar Tshiebwe, Kentucky
6 of 6
- Grant Halverson/NCAA Photos via Getty Images
Similarly, expect a short stay from Oscar Tshiebwe after Kentucky lost to Kansas State in the second round.
But his production was ridiculous.
Tshiebwe scored eight points and grabbed an absurd 25 rebounds with three steals, two assists and two blocks in Kentucky’s victory over Providence. He then contributed 25 points and 18 rebounds, two steals and an assist in the season-ending loss to Kansas State.
The two-time All-American and the 2021-22 National Player of the Year again did everything in his power to carry the ‘Cats. He amassed 30 points and 16 rebounds in UK’s lone tournament game last season.
For the second straight year, however, it still wasn’t enough.
Football Live Score – Sofascore
NCAA Men
USA
Get notified for all games in this tournament
284 followers
1 Oct 30 Apr.
Details
Matches
Receive notifications for all games in this tournament
284 followers
Upcoming match
Loading…
9000 4 Most Fan Rated Matches
Loading…
Loading..
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
League info 90 005
Titles
Denver Pioneers
Defending champion (9)
Denver Pioneers
Most titled (9)
Michigan Wolverines
Most titled (9)
facts
9 0006 Number of contestants64
Venue
CountryUSA
About us
NCAA Men is an ice hockey tournament.
The country in which the NCAA Men is held is called
USA.
Current Denver Pioneers winner.
In addition to NCAA Men information such as standings, results and match lists, you can find other statistics, odds and results of hockey matches on SofaScore.
NCAA Men
USA
Receive notifications for all games in this tournament
284 followers
1 Oct 30 Apr Table
Homes
Guests
Loading…
Loading…
League Information
Titles
Denver Pioneers
Defending Champion (9)
Denver Pioneers
Most Titled (9)
Michigan Wolverines
Most titled (9)
facts
Number of opponents64
Venue
CountryUSA
Upcoming match
Loading…
Top fan-rated matches
Loading…
Loading …
Loading …
Loading …
Loading …
Loading …
Loading …
Loading …
Loading …
9
Loading…
Top players
Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading. ..
Top stats
Top Stats show you remarkable stats that certain players achieved in a league match.
#
Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…
Top teams
#
Command
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
900 06 Loading…
About us
NCAA Men is a hockey tournament.
The country in which the NCAA Men is held is called
USA.
Current Denver Pioneers winner.
In addition to NCAA Men information such as standings, results and match lists, you can find other statistics, odds and results of hockey matches on SofaScore.
BLAST.tv Paris Major 2023 CS:GO Tournament – schedule, tournament bracket, teams line-up, results, predictions and news -Pacific RMR QualEU RMR Decider
Event date
05/08/2023 – 05/21/2023
Prize money
$ 1,250,000
Venue
9 0006 Paris, France
- Challenger Stage (May 8-11):
- Swiss 16 team format
- All best-of-1 matches
- Relegation and advancement matches – bo3
- Top 8 teams advance to Legends Stage
- Bottom 8 teams are eliminated 9 0240
- Legends Stage (May 13-16):
- Swiss 16 team format
- All best-of-1 matches
- Relegation and advancement to the next stage – bo3
- Top 8 teams advance to Champions Stage
- 8 worst teams are eliminated
- Champions Stage (May 18-21):
- Single Elimination Bracket
- All best-of-3 matches
Bracket ParticipantsResults
Tournament bracket
Challengers Stage
Legends Stage
Champions Stage
Show match
Quarterfinals
18.
05.23 at 16:00Heroic 900 05
2
Faze
9Monte 9
05/19/23 at 18:55
Liquid
0
Apeks
2
05/20/23 at 16:00
Heroic
1
GamerLegion 9Apeks
0
0
Sex final
Final
05/21/23 at 18:00
GamerLegion
0
Vitality
05.23 at 16:00Participants
Joao felps Vasconcellos
Vinicius v$m Moreira
Adriano WOOD7 Cerate
Lucas Lucaozy Neves
Alan history Lawrence
Denis electroNic Sharipov
Valery b1t Vakhovsky
Ilya Perfecto Zalutsky 900 05
Alexander s1mple Kostylev
Andrey npl Kukharsky
Kristoff Goofy Gorsky
Kamil KEI Petkun
Katsper Kylar Valyukevich
Viktor mynio Kruk
Olek hades Mishkevich
Yury Yuurih Santos
Andrey arT Piovezan
Kaike KSCERATO Kerato
Rafael saffee Costa
André drop Abreu
Dion FASHR Derksen
Freddie KRiMZ Johansson
William mezii Merriman
Nico nicoodoz Tamjidi
Fredrik roeJ Jorgensen
Thomas Thomas Utting
Kai CYPHER Watson
Karol rallen Radovic
Sebastian volt Malos
Joe CRUC1AL Steasil
Dan apEX Madeskler
Mathieu ZywOo Erbo
Emil Magisk Reif
Peter dupreeh Rasmussen
Lotan Spinx Giladi
Rene TeSeS Madsen
Martin stavn Lund
Jacob Jabbi Nygaard
Rasmus sjuush Beck
Casper cadiaN Möller
Rigon rigoN Gashi
Dionysus sinnopsyy Boudeki
Flatron juanflatroo Halimi
Sener SENER1 Makhmuti
Gench gxx- Kolgechi
Shimon kRaSnaL Mrozhek
Sergey DemQQ Demchenko
Mukhammed BOROS Malkhas
Vladimir Woro2k Veletnyuk
Viktor sdy Orudzhev
Pavel dycha Dykha
Marco Snappi Pfeiffer
Pavle maden Boshkovich 9 0005
Alvaro SunPayus Garcia
Guy Nertz Ilutz
David frozen Chernyansky
Christopher dexter Nong
Adam torzsi Torjas
John JDC de Castro
Dorian xertioN Berman
Jay liazz Treguilas
Simon sico Williams
Alistair aliStair Johnston
Declan Vexite Portelli
Josh INS Potter
Gabriel NEKIZ Shenato
Wesley hardzao Lopez
Rodrigo biguzera Bittencourt 90 005
romeu zevy rocco
felippe skullz medeiros
justin jks savage
rasmus hooxi nielsen
Nemanja huNter- Kovacs
Nikola NiKo Kovacs
Ilya m0NESY Osipov
Kamil siuhy Shkaradek
Nicholas Keoz Juice
Isak isak Falen
Frederic acoR Guldstrand
Ivan iM Mihai
Andrey Jerry Mekhryakov
Alexander zorte Zagodyrenko
Vladislav Krad Kravchenko 900 05
Alexander Shalfey Marenov
Evgeny r3salt Frolov
Abdul degster Hasanov
Shakhar flameZ Shushan
Nikolay niko Christensen
Masey F1KU Miklash
Adam NEOFRAG Zukhar
Joakim jkaem Mirbustad
Tim nawwk Jonasson
Martin STYKO Stick
Giustinas jL Lekavicius
Damian Kyxsan Stoilkowski
Aleksi Aleksib Virolainen
Ludwig Brollan Brolin
Daniel headtr1ck Vali
Fredrik REZ Sterner
Christian k0nfig Wieneke
Haakon Hallzerk Fjarli
Michael Grim Vince
Ricky floppy Camery
Justin FaNg Cockley
Joni JT Theodosiou
Howard rain Nygard
Helwijs broky Saukants
Russell Twistzz Van Dalken
Finn karrigan Andersen
Robin ropz Kohl
Keith NAF Markovic
Jonathan EliGE Jablonowski
Nick nitr0 Cannella 90 005
Joshua oSee Om
Marek YEKINDAR Galinskis
Garidmagnai blitz Byambasuren
Sodbayar Techno4K Monkhbold
Baatarhuu Bart4k Batbold
Tuvshintugs Annihilation Nyamdorzhiy
hasteka
Tournament news
11.
