What are the key aspects of Lehigh University’s rowing programs. How can prospective athletes get involved in Lehigh rowing. What community initiatives are associated with Lehigh’s rowing program. How does Lehigh’s rowing team compare to other universities.
Lehigh University Women’s Rowing: Program Overview and Recruitment
Lehigh University boasts a robust women’s rowing program that offers exciting opportunities for student-athletes. The program is led by a dedicated coaching staff committed to developing talent and fostering a competitive team environment.
Coaching Staff
The coaching staff for Lehigh University’s women’s rowing program includes:
- Head Coach: Brian Conley
- Assistant Coach: Alex Urbanik
- Assistant Coach: Julianna Malachin
These experienced coaches play a crucial role in shaping the team’s success and guiding athletes throughout their collegiate rowing careers.
Recruitment Process
For aspiring rowers looking to join Lehigh’s program, understanding the recruitment process is essential. How can prospective athletes increase their chances of being recruited? Here are some key steps:
- Build a strong athletic profile
- Reach out to coaches early in your high school career
- Attend rowing camps and clinics
- Maintain strong academic performance
- Participate in competitive regattas
Utilizing resources like the National Collegiate Scouting Association (NCSA) can significantly aid in the recruitment process. The NCSA provides a platform for athletes to create profiles, connect with coaches, and gain exposure to various rowing programs across the country.
Community Rowing Initiatives: YWCA Allentown and Lehigh University Partnership
Lehigh University’s commitment to rowing extends beyond its collegiate program. The university has partnered with YWCA Allentown to create the Lehigh Valley Community Rowing program, which aims to make rowing accessible to a broader audience.
Learn to Row Program
The Learn to Row program is a cornerstone of the community initiative. It provides an excellent opportunity for individuals to experience the sport of rowing firsthand. Who can participate in the Learn to Row program?
- Adults and students aged 13 and above
- Individuals of all fitness levels
- No prior rowing experience required
Juniors and Masters Clinics
The community program offers specialized clinics for different age groups:
Juniors Clinics:
- Open to students aged 13 and above in the Lehigh Valley
- Free for students from the Allentown School District
- Includes summer, fall, and indoor sessions
Masters Clinics:
- Open to all adults in the Lehigh Valley
- Welcomes participants of all fitness and experience levels
- Limited scholarships available
Allentown School District Initiatives: Breaking Barriers in Rowing
One of the most impactful aspects of the Lehigh Valley Community Rowing program is its focus on providing opportunities for students from the Allentown School District. How does this initiative benefit local students?
- Subsidized participation in clinics and camps
- Physical education through the ErgEd curriculum
- On-water rowing clinics
- Access to regional regattas and rowing events
- Academic support through SAT preparedness classes
This comprehensive approach not only introduces students to the sport of rowing but also provides valuable academic and personal development opportunities.
Lehigh University Men’s Rowing: Building a Competitive Program
While the women’s rowing program at Lehigh University has garnered significant attention, the men’s rowing team is also an integral part of the university’s athletic landscape. The men’s team competes at a high level and continues to develop talented rowers year after year.
2020-2021 Men’s Rowing Roster
The men’s rowing roster showcases the depth and diversity of talent within the program. While specific roster details may vary from year to year, the team typically consists of a mix of experienced rowers and promising newcomers.
Training and Development
How does Lehigh University prepare its male rowers for competition? The program focuses on several key areas:
- Rigorous on-water training sessions
- Strength and conditioning programs
- Technical skill development
- Mental preparation and strategy
- Team building exercises
This comprehensive approach ensures that Lehigh’s male rowers are well-prepared to compete at the collegiate level.
Comparing Lehigh University Rowing to Other Programs
When evaluating Lehigh University’s rowing program, it’s natural to wonder how it stacks up against other collegiate rowing programs. While direct comparisons can be challenging due to the unique aspects of each program, there are several factors to consider:
Facilities and Equipment
Lehigh University provides its rowing teams with access to modern facilities and equipment. This includes:
- State-of-the-art rowing machines (ergometers)
- Well-maintained boats for various crew sizes
- On-campus training facilities
- Access to suitable waterways for practice and competition
Competitive Performance
The success of a rowing program is often measured by its performance in competitions. Lehigh University’s teams regularly participate in prestigious regattas and have achieved notable results over the years.
Academic Integration
As with many top-tier universities, Lehigh places a strong emphasis on balancing athletic pursuits with academic excellence. The rowing program is designed to support student-athletes in their studies while fostering their athletic development.
The Impact of Rowing on Student-Athletes at Lehigh University
Participating in the rowing program at Lehigh University offers numerous benefits to student-athletes. What are some of the key advantages of being part of the rowing team?
- Physical fitness and conditioning
- Time management and discipline
- Teamwork and leadership skills
- Opportunities for personal growth
- Networking with alumni and fellow athletes
These skills and experiences often translate well beyond the rowing course, preparing students for success in their future careers and personal lives.
Future Prospects for Lehigh University Rowing
As Lehigh University continues to invest in its rowing programs, the future looks bright for both the men’s and women’s teams. What can we expect from Lehigh rowing in the coming years?
- Continued focus on recruitment and talent development
- Expansion of community outreach programs
- Potential upgrades to facilities and equipment
- Increased competitiveness in regional and national competitions
- Growing alumni network and support
With a strong foundation in place, Lehigh University’s rowing program is well-positioned to continue its growth and success in the collegiate rowing landscape.
In conclusion, Lehigh University’s rowing program offers a comprehensive and inclusive approach to the sport, combining competitive collegiate teams with community outreach initiatives. From recruitment opportunities for aspiring student-athletes to programs that break down barriers for local students, Lehigh’s commitment to rowing extends far beyond the water. As the program continues to evolve and grow, it promises to remain a significant part of both the university’s athletic offerings and the broader Lehigh Valley community.
Lehigh University Women’s Rowing Program Information
Thanks for visiting the Lehigh University Women’s Rowing scholarship and program details page. Here you’ll have access to information regarding the college and information on their Women’s Rowing program like who to contact about recruitment, names of past alumni, what scholarship opportunities can be had and how to start the recruiting process.
Lehigh University Women’s rowing Program Coaching & Recruiting Staff
If you’re trying to get recruited it’s important to know who to build a relationship with – and NCSA provides the details you need. The Assistant Coach of the Lehigh University Women’s Rowing program is Alex Urbanik. Additional essential staff include:
- Head Coach Brian Conley
- Assistant Coach Julianna Malachin
If you are considering being a member of Lehigh University Women’s Rowing program they are the people you’ll want to contact. You can choose to contact them via email using the link above or call the school to get additional information regarding the college and Women’s Rowing program prior to deciding on if it’s a suitable fit for you.
Build a Free NCSA Profile to Start Connecting with Coaches
NCSA offers student high school athletes the resources and info they need to improve their chances of being recruited by a Women’s Rowing program, whether it is at Lehigh University or another college. Since 2000, NCSA has been connecting coaches and athletes which is a critical component of the recruiting process. This year alone there are 4139 Women’s Rowing student athletes making use of the NCSA network, technology and scouting professionals to get their highlights before 461 coaches at 181 colleges Women’s Rowing programs all over the country.
If you’d like to join the Lehigh University Women’s Rowing program you need to begin to build relationships and a highly-visible, professional quality recruiting profile. Starting that process as soon as possible is crucial to your success. So make your free profile to become a confirmed NCSA Women’s Rowing student athlete and begin connecting with coaches at the Lehigh University Women’s Rowing program today.
Community Rowing – YWCA Allentown
Building community connection and fostering personal growth through the sport of rowing
**All 2020 clinics are canceled due to concerns about COVID-19. Please check back for information on our 2021 season**
In partnership with Lehigh University Rowing, the Lehigh Valley Community Rowing program provides opportunities to access the sport of rowing through the Learn to Row program, and develops athletes through juniors and masters rowing clinics.
Students from the Allentown School District are subsidized, removing cost as a major barrier to participation in clinics and camps. Students receive physical education through the ErgEd curriculum and on water rowing clinics, access to and entries in regional regattas and rowing events, and academic support through SAT preparedness classes.
Athletes of any age, experience, and fitness level are welcome! Join us on the water!
Register for Learn to Row Day
Discover the sport of rowing at Learn to Row Day!
FREE! Open to adults and students ages 13+!
Registration opens 05/01/20
Register for Juniors Clinics
Juniors Clinics are open to all students ages 13+ in the Lehigh Valley.
Summer, fall, and indoor clinics are FREE for students living in the Allentown School District. Call 610-871-5060 for information on ASD student scholarships.
Register for Masters Clinics
Masters Clinics are open to all adults in the Lehigh Valley. All fitness and experience levels welcome! Limited scholarships are available. Call 610-871-5060 for more information.
Yale University Men’s Soccer History vs Lehigh University
Men’s Soccer History
>
Lehigh University
Men’s Soccer History vs Lehigh University from Oct 27, 2010 -
Sep 15, 2013
Last Matchup
Sep.
15,2013
0
at
1
Longest Win Streak
1
Game
10/27/2010 – 10/27/2010
Longest Losing Streak
3
Games
9/4/2011 – 9/15/2013
Last 4 Matchups
1-3
10/27/2010-9/15/2013
| Date | Season | Location | Score | Media |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
September 15, 2013 9/15/2013 |
2013 |
|
| |
|
October 16, 2012 10/16/2012 |
2012 |
|
| |
|
September 4, 2011 9/4/2011 |
2011 |
|
| |
|
October 27, 2010 10/27/2010 |
2010 |
|
|
| [15:00] |
Spence, James at goalie for LEHIGH. 
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [15:00] |
|
Vitton, Will at goalie for VU. 
| |||
| [15:00] |
Faceoff Sisselberger, Mike vs Coppola, Justin won by LEHIGH, [15:00] Ground ball pickup by LEHIGH Sisselberger, Mike. |
| |||
| [14:53] |
Shot by LEHIGH Sisselberger, Mike WIDE. |
| |||
| [13:29] |
Shot by LEHIGH Sidorski, John, SAVE Vitton, Will. |
| |||
| [13:26] |
|
Ground ball pickup by VU Prybylski, Owen. | |||
| [13:15] |
|
Clear attempt by VU good. | |||
| [13:02] |
|
Shot by VU Overbay, Eric WIDE. | |||
| [12:45] |
|
Shot by VU Campbell, Matt HIGH. | |||
| [12:43] |
|
Ground ball pickup by VU Daly, Patrick. | |||
| [12:19] |
|
Turnover by VU Campbell, Matt. | |||
| [12:11] |
Clear attempt by LEHIGH failed. |
| |||
| [12:11] |
Turnover by LEHIGH. |
| |||
| [11:30] |
| 0 |
| 1 |
GOAL by VU Crowley, Colin (FIRST GOAL), goal number 10 for season. |
| [11:30] |
|
Faceoff Sisselberger, Mike vs Coppola, Justin won by VU, [11:30] Ground ball pickup by VU LaPorte, Brody. | |||
| [10:51] |
|
Shot by VU McManus, Corey, SAVE Spence, James. | |||
| [10:46] |
|
Ground ball pickup by VU Crowley, Colin. | |||
| [10:36] |
|
Shot by VU Daly, Patrick, SAVE Spence, James. | |||
| [10:17] |
Clear attempt by LEHIGH failed. |
| |||
| [10:17] |
Turnover by LEHIGH. |
| |||
| [10:17] |
|
Clear attempt by VU good. | |||
| [10:17] |
|
Shot by VU McManus, Corey, SAVE Spence, James. | |||
| [10:00] |
|
Shot by VU McManus, Corey, SAVE Spence, James. | |||
| [09:57] |
|
Shot by VU Reale, Mason, SAVE Spence, James. | |||
| [09:57] |
Clear attempt by LEHIGH good. |
| |||
| [08:25] |
GOAL by LEHIGH Schelling, Tommy, goal number 22 for season. | 1 |
| 1 |
|
| [08:25] |
Faceoff Sisselberger, Mike vs Coppola, Justin won by LEHIGH, [08:25] Ground ball pickup by LEHIGH Leggett, Teddy. |
| |||
| [08:06] |
Turnover by LEHIGH Leggett, Teddy (caused by Comizio, Chet). |
| |||
| [08:06] |
|
Ground ball pickup by VU Comizio, Chet. | |||
| [08:06] |
Penalty on LEHIGH Leggett, Teddy (HOLDING/0:30) Extra-man opportunity. |
| |||
| [07:49] |
|
Shot by VU Crowley, Colin HIGH. | |||
| [07:44] |
| 1 |
| 2 |
GOAL by VU Crowley, Colin (MAN-UP), Assist by Khan, Keegan, goal number 11 for season. |
| [07:44] |
Faceoff Sisselberger, Mike vs Coppola, Justin won by LEHIGH, [07:44] Ground ball pickup by LEHIGH Sisselberger, Mike. |
| |||
| [07:14] |
Shot by LEHIGH Eichelberger, Andrew HIT POST. |
| |||
| [06:31] |
Shot by LEHIGH Kirst, Cole, SAVE Vitton, Will. |
| |||
| [05:51] |
Turnover by LEHIGH Mule’, Christian (caused by Prybylski, Owen). |
| |||
| [05:48] |
|
Ground ball pickup by VU Kryza, Zachary. | |||
| [05:39] |
|
Clear attempt by VU good. | |||
| [05:22] |
| 1 |
| 3 |
GOAL by VU Campbell, Matt, goal number 31 for season. |
| [05:22] |
Faceoff Sisselberger, Mike vs Coppola, Justin won by LEHIGH, [05:22] Ground ball pickup by LEHIGH Sisselberger, Mike. |
| |||
| [05:06] |
Ground ball pickup by LEHIGH Kirst, Cole. |
| |||
| [04:24] |
Turnover by LEHIGH Kirst, Cole (caused by Kryza, Zachary). |
| |||
| [04:20] |
|
Ground ball pickup by VU Burke, Gavin. | |||
| [04:17] |
|
Clear attempt by VU failed. | |||
| [04:14] |
|
Turnover by VU Hunt, Colin (caused by Gersbeck, Kevin). | |||
| [04:09] |
Ground ball pickup by LEHIGH Gersbeck, Kevin. |
| |||
| [04:02] |
Turnover by LEHIGH Mule’, Christian. |
| |||
| [03:54] |
|
Clear attempt by VU good. | |||
| [03:15] |
|
Turnover by VU Campbell, Matt (caused by Tangredi, Anthony). | |||
| [03:10] |
Ground ball pickup by LEHIGH Douglas, Matt. |
| |||
| [03:04] |
Clear attempt by LEHIGH good. |
| |||
| [02:27] |
Shot by LEHIGH Cole, Scott BLOCKED. |
| |||
| [02:11] |
|
Clear attempt by VU good. | |||
| [01:56] |
| 1 |
| 4 |
GOAL by VU Daly, Patrick, Assist by Khan, Keegan, goal number 21 for season. |
| [01:56] |
Penalty on LEHIGH McIlroy, Patrick (UNNECESSARY ROUGHNESS/1:00) Extra-man opportunity. |
| |||
| [01:42] |
|
Shot by VU Daly, Patrick HIGH. | |||
| [01:31] |
|
Shot by VU Campbell, Matt WIDE. | |||
| [01:22] |
|
Shot by VU Overbay, Eric WIDE. | |||
| [01:21] |
|
Shot by VU Crowley, Colin, SAVE Spence, James. | |||
| [01:11] |
|
Shot by VU Overbay, Eric, SAVE Spence, James. | |||
| [01:05] |
|
Ground ball pickup by VU Khan, Keegan. | |||
| [01:04] |
|
Shot by VU Crowley, Colin HIGH. | |||
| [00:54] |
|
Shot by VU Daly, Patrick HIGH. | |||
| [00:13] |
|
Shot by VU McManus, Corey WIDE. | |||
| [00:09] |
Ground ball pickup by LEHIGH Spence, James. |
| |||
| [00:08] |
Clear attempt by LEHIGH good. |
| |||
| [00:00] |
End-of-period. |
|
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/65710656/Teddy_Leggett_2848.0.0.jpg)
/GettyImages-160197196-59db95fe03f4020010395e5f.jpg)
Crash involving Lehigh University rowing team’s bus kills 1
BETHLEHEM (AP) — An accident involving a car and a bus carrying members of a university rowing team on Tuesday left the bus flipped over on its roof on a highway and killed one person, but no major injuries to students were reported.
The crash, involving a Lehigh University bus, happened Tuesday evening on a highway near the Lehigh-Northampton county line.
There were no major injuries to the 20 students on the Lehigh men’s and women’s crew team or to university personnel, university spokeswoman Lori Friedman said. The students were taken to hospitals for evaluation, she said.
There was one fatality reported involving the other vehicle, she said, but she didn’t have details.
The county coroner’s office was called to the scene, as was the Lehigh University Police Department. State police were trying to find out what caused the accident.
Lehigh Office of the Dean of Students personnel and members of the athletics department were helping the students.
“Our thoughts are with the students and their families, as well as the other individuals who were involved in this tragic circumstance,” the university said in a statement.
A Lehigh University school bus remains on the scene following a fatal accident involving a car on Tuesday in Bethlehem.
https://www.timesleader.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/web1_BusCrash_3_web.jpgA Lehigh University school bus remains on the scene following a fatal accident involving a car on Tuesday in Bethlehem. Chris Post | AP
An officer works on the scene following a fatal accident involving a car and a Lehigh University bus on Tuesday in Bethlehem.
https://www.timesleader.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/web1_BusCrash_2_web.jpgAn officer works on the scene following a fatal accident involving a car and a Lehigh University bus on Tuesday in Bethlehem. Emily Paine | The Morning Call via AP
Emergency personnel work at the scene of an accident involving a Lehigh University bus and a car on Tuesday in Bethlehem.
https://www.timesleader.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/web1_BusCrash_1_web.jpgEmergency personnel work at the scene of an accident involving a Lehigh University bus and a car on Tuesday in Bethlehem. Chris Post | AP
Lehigh University’s rowing teams compete at the Murphy Cup
The Lehigh men’s and women’s rowing teams
competed in the Murphy Cup on Saturday which was held on the Cooper River in Camden, N.J.
Both squads had a successful day on the water despite the rainy weather; three crews advanced to the grand finals and another advanced to the petite finals. The Men’s Freshmen Eight was able to earn silver in the grand finals along with the Men’s Freshmen Four and Men’s Varsity Eight also made it into the finals. Women’s Varsity Eight was also able to earn second with its efforts in the petite finals.
Sophomore Anna Eggert credited her coach for inspiring the team.
“Prior to the start of competition our coach, Brian Conley, told us all to push through the bad weather and be focused on performing to the best of our abilities,” Eggert said. “He reminded us that we deserved to get into the finals we just had to go out and prove it.”
In the morning heat, the Men’s Freshmen Eight finished third with a time of 7:07.67. In the afternoon’s finals, the crew placed second, finishing in 7:31.40.
Men’s Freshmen Four finished second in its morning heat, coming in at 8:21.68. The squad barely missed a medal, taking fourth place in the finals with a time of 8:42.07. Men’s Varsity Eight took second in the morning heat with a time of 7:21.68 and made it to the grand finals.
The Women’s Varsity Eight captured a lot of attention, placing fourth in its heat with a time of 8:26.74, then placing second in the petite finals — finishing in 8:17.27.
Sophomore Leslie Lockyer had to battle adverse weather before her heat.
“Conditions affected our moods and I think it really put a damper on our first race, but the second time around when the weather started to clear our performance was more congruent to our actual abilities,” she said. “I think it’s safe to say that there were more disadvantages than advantages so overall I think we did the best we could but there is definitely some improvement to be made.”
The teams had a quick turnaround as they headed out to New Rochelle, N.Y., to race against
Iona College, Robert Morris University, and Marist College on Sunday.
Story by Brown and White sports writer Derek Knott, ’16.
Chase Elliott’s NASCAR car chief a Lehigh Valley native
What it’s like to drive a NASCAR-style stock car at Pocono Raceway
Have you ever wondered what it’s like to drive a racecar on an official NASCAR superspeedway? Pocono Record Sports Life reporter Frank Piscani takes you behind the wheel to find out.
Frank Piscani, Pocono Record
For Lehigh Valley native Matt Barndt, racing was always a sport for grown-ups.
Racing wasn’t exactly a popular sport in school while he was growing up, but 5-year-old Barndt fell in love with it and never looked back.
He didn’t have middle school or varsity teammates to race with, so racing began almost exclusively as a family affair. He grew up traveling the country with his parents and younger sister to compete in races, building a bond between himself, his family and racing that became the foundation of his life.
That’s why when the car chief for Hendrick Motorsports’ No. 9 Chevrolet returns to Pennsylvania for the Pocono Raceway doubleheader weekend, the racing experience means a little bit more.
Of interest: A guide to weather and traffic for Pocono Raceway’s Doubleheader
Breakdown: Here’s four things you should know before the Pocono Raceway NASCAR Doubleheader Weekend
A fan of NASCAR growing up, Barndt said it was his family competing as a unit that elevated his interest in the sport into a passion. Having to work together to compete meant building very close relationships, Barndt said.
The people he met in the racing community would become like family members, but the bond with his sister and parents was especially important.
“(Racing) turned into much more than just the four of us, but it was our family’s pastime,” Barndt said.
By the time he was 14 years old, the Bethlehem-area born-and-raised Barndt knew he’d turn that passion into a career.
Barndt’s parents had given him and his sister an ultimatum: college or racing.
His parents said he’d have their support no matter what, but that he had to commit himself to a path.
“At 14 years old that’s kind of a hard decision to make,” Barndt said with a laugh. “I of course chose racing.”
But the ultimatum ended up being a sort of faux-decision, as college would be the route Barndt took to make a career out of racing. Since then he’s moved from behind the wheel during races into the garage, thanks in large part to his education at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
UNC Charlotte was an obvious choice for the Saucon Valley Senior High School graduate, an aspiring engineer looking for opportunities with auto racing teams. The Charlotte metro area’s strong ties to racing meant many avenues to find that big break.
During his sophomore year Barndt found opportunity in the form of an internship with Hendrick Motorsports.
“The rest is basically just history,” Barndt said.
He’s now worked for Hendrick Motorsports for a decade, working his way up from design engineer intern throughout the pit crew ladder. Now in his second season as the No. 9 Chevy’s car chief for Chase Elliott, Barndt ranks just below the crew chief in the pit crew hierarchy.
Being in the role for his second season means Barndt is already familiar with the challenges of the doubleheader format, which leaves crews with only a handful of hours to make car adjustments and repairs in between the weekend’s two Cup races.
The return to Pocono this year means more than just a return to the doubleheader, though, as Barndt will be able to spend time with the friends and family that helped him get to where he is. That opportunity wasn’t present last year without fans at Pocono Raceway, so Barndt said he’s looking forward to seeing everyone.
Barndt has few opportunities to come to Pennsylvania to begin with, because the NASCAR season from February into November keeps him on the road for most of the year. Barndt said he cherishes the chance to be back.
“Living nine hours away, you don’t really get to spend a lot of time with them,” Barndt said of his family. “They had such … a huge role in me being where I am today that it’s always just fun seeing them.”
Frank Piscani is the Sports Life multimedia reporter at the Pocono Record. You can email him at [email protected] or find him on social media platforms @frankpiscani.
90,000 Scott Fitzgerald. Open letter to Fritz Chrysler.
Scott Fitzgerald. Open letter to Fritz Chrysler.
Dear Fritz!
You wrote to me again and asked for advice on how to play in the upcoming season. I hasten to answer: I am convinced that it would be a big mistake to take someone from the University Board of Trustees with a left tack instead of Charlie “Aisa” Seppi and Christian “Dean” Eisenhart. My idea is to make up a defense of Kipke, Eddie Mayhan, President Lowell and someone else for our left side – Pepper Einstein in the center – and then either bring back Harry Lee’s Little Horse, or you yourself, come on get up to this vacant place.Or change Kadlich, put him in the center, and replace him with someone from the “lightweight” team.
If this is not possible (and this is stated in your letter), the question arises of using someone from the Board of Trustees. But who? And How? There is “Hack” Kalbau. There is also the late President Witherspoon – but where is he now? There is also Harkness Hall, but we cannot get it – unless we pay it as a “hurry before dispatch”!
The best advice in this case is probably to put Rollo Ralon to run exclusively forward, and return to the Houghton system.
Fritz, of course I understand that you and I and Ted know a little more about this than I do. But, nevertheless, I will make my suggestion: let all the ends, defense players and members of the Board of Trustees start together at the beginning of the game; then let them change positions under the leadership of the most prominent professors and graduates (Alby Bus, Bob Lassiter, etc.) and then we will not have time to blink an eye, as we will completely disrupt all the plans of the Yale team … So, let’s see what I mean? I wanted to say, the plans of Lehigh University … Well, somebody’s plans, even our own! In any case, the main thing is that the Civil Engineering Administration program is either dead or has just begun, and if you again use the option of the “Mexican” shift that I proposed last year, it will lead to disaster! Why? Even I can handle it! Martino gets out of the dump on the field, or gets into it again – gives a pass to one of the members of last year’s teams (here, due to the selection rules, you cannot name names) and then … Well, from now on we are aiming almost anywhere.
But take my advice, Fritz Chrysler: not this year!
Your team.
Princeton Sports News, June 16, 1934 issue. The letter was written by Fitzgerald in response to a questionnaire sent to him as an alumnus and former varsity team member asking for recommendations for improvements to the varsity football team.
Original text: An Open Letter to Fritz Crisler, by F. Scott Fitzgerald.
© Anton Rudnev, translation into Russian, 2017
90,000 Four Ways to Measure the ROI of a Project Management Platform
Imagine the situation.A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, you are leading an important project for a government military organization. You must create the most powerful weapon the size of the moon, capable of destroying planets. But problems lie in wait for you at every turn: inadequate requirements for the project, inability of management to assess the risk, inability to establish joint work due to the fault of the same management, intrigue, etc. In the end, the project explodes to hell. Literally.
If you haven’t figured it out yet, this is the Death Star.Lehigh University students estimated the cost of its construction at 852 quadrillion dollars, and this is only the cost of manufacturing metal structures. This disrupted project would have cost a lot.
Although this is an example from a different universe, ineffective work organization in your company can cost you just as much if left to chance. It is difficult to track the financial impact of workflow management on your day-to-day operations, but the costs of inefficient systems are often ruinous.
90,035 90,036 Companies lose $ 97 million for every billion invested in projects (PMI, 2017).
These statistics look as intimidating as a Star Destroyer preparing to attack, but you have a “new hope.” (Okay, okay, we’re not talking about Star Wars anymore.) A project management and collaboration platform comes into play.
According to the Project Management Institute (PMI), organizations using any of the project management methodologies are more likely to meet budgets and deadlines, do the right work and meet quality standards, and get all the expected benefits.The 2017 Pulse of the Profession study found that companies that implemented powerful project management initiatives saved 28 times more money on projects.
Your growing organization needs to optimize productivity, data visibility and collaboration to maximize revenue, but how do you know the project management platform is the system you need?
Whether you’re trying to pick a solution that pays for the price, justifying an investment in front of your boss, or proving the profitability of an existing tool, you have four main ways to measure the profitability of your project management platform.
- The economic effect of completing more projects with fewer staff . Your team gets the opportunity to increase the amount of work done with the same resources.
- The effect of saving time or money spent on the implementation of the project . Evaluate the increase in project efficiency by reducing operating costs.
- The economic benefits of improved collaboration, productivity and employee satisfaction. Consider increased employee satisfaction closely related to reduced turnover and productivity.
- Economic benefits from integration and automation . Improved productivity and technical efficiency lead to improved workflows.
Let’s take a look at each of these methods.
Four Ways to Measure the ROI of a Project Management Platform
1. Economic effect from the implementation of more projects with fewer staff
Many of us have seen the well-known diagram of the marketing technology landscape.
An incredible number of logos illustrate the current competitive situation in various industries. Brands need to be innovative to stay ahead of the competition. While executives are forced to pay payroll contributions and strive to optimize performance, the workload for frontline employees continues to grow, and OKRs become more elusive. But what if the new tool helps the team to complete more projects without bringing in additional people? Or even allow for less staff?
What do your team members spend their time on? In many cases, this is a search for information, documents, contact details of members, reviews, information about the status – and the list can go on and on.According to the results of one survey, team members can spend 21.8 hours a week searching for documents and information on a project, which is 54.5% of the duration of a 40-hour work week. Let’s say you pay an employee $ 1,000 a week. In this case, you lose $ 545 per week, and this unproductive work will cost you $ 28,340 per year.
And it’s not that your employees are wasting their time – they work hard using the tools and processes they have.But what if you manage to increase their productivity?
Project management and collaboration platforms such as Wrike can help reduce the time spent waiting or searching for data. Such a platform brings together project schedules, tasks, discussions and all documentation, creating a single source of reliable information. For example, Wrike integrates with over 400 tools to help teams find the information they need in one centralized repository.
Thanks to these capabilities, any employee can access project data at any convenient time.Without such a platform, project information would be kept scattered in chats or e-mails, and it would be very time-consuming to find it. In addition, Wrike has a feature called Workflow Statuses, which allows you to automatically notify participants about task statuses so everyone knows where the project is and doesn’t waste time figuring out.
The project management platform not only helps the team save time and money through transparency of work data, but also enables the implementation of Agile methodologies and project management structures.This helps teams become even more productive. By standardizing processes and keeping all discussions centralized, teams can get more work done in less time.
For example, Wrike customer Chad Borenz, director of marketing for professional services agency IdeaS and Revenue Solutions, says: time has quadrupled.On average, we were able to carry out 20 to 50 projects, and now we are doing more than two hundred, although the number of employees in our group remains the same. The implementation of Wrike has greatly improved our productivity. ”
Evaluation of profitability
Whether you are looking for the right solution or have already found one, compare the number of projects you could have completed before implementing the project management platform with what is now. To take into account the financial components, add the required indicators. For example, you might include employee salaries and the average project cost in your equation.Don’t forget to evaluate and make improvements! Especially if your team starts using Agile methodologies or new project management structures.
(The number of projects completed before implementation in a certain period of time) / (The number of team members) compared with (The number of projects being carried out now in a certain period of time) / (The number of team members)
Keep in mind that reforming project management processes takes time! Give the team a chance to get used to the new tool.As Sean Carty, senior product manager at Wrike, noted, “This metric is closely related to opportunity cost and the ability to channel your limited resources towards the most profitable projects.”
2. The effect of saving time or money spent on the implementation of the project
According to our research on the professional services market, 97% of projects are not completed on time, and the main reason for the churn of clients is the violation of the project deadline or excess of the budget.This issue affects many teams in various industries. Capterra’s list of critical metrics for project management cites project cost management as the biggest challenge faced by project managers in the manufacturing sector. This is followed by problems related to meeting deadlines and sharing information between teams. Profit losses due to delays can be caused by many factors:
- The cost of paying more employees over a longer time
- Costs caused by the loss of clients due to ineffective project management
- Lost profits due to lack of time for new customers
- And the list goes on and on.
Streamlining workflows with a project management platform is bound to lead to increased profitability. But, in addition to increasing the number of completed projects with the same amount of resources, you should also consider the cost savings due to faster and more reliable work execution.
Wrike Customer Selena Curry, Event Manager at Goodwood Group, says: “We’re saving money now because we anticipate problems ahead of time. But if we had to solve these problems during the event, it would require additional labor, and we would have to negotiate with many suppliers who deliver orders at different times.So we save not only money, but also time and effort. ”
The project management platform allows you to get a holistic view of the project schedule, statuses and dependencies and easily understand where exactly the obstacle may arise. This allows managers to better allocate resources, plan work, and eliminate bottlenecks. Tools like Wrike help you not only get work insights, but also prioritize them correctly.
Sean Amster, Chief Strategy Officer at Frontline Education, puts it this way: “After implementing Wrike, projects that took us eight days are now completed in five.We manage to complete 80 more projects per quarter. Thanks to Wrike, our marketers were able to increase their workload by 20%. ”
Evaluation of profitability
Every team and every project is unique. You may find it difficult to convert the time saved into dollars, and employee and customer satisfaction does not translate into money. But our marketers have developed a formula to help you determine the economic impact of saving money and time.
Formula:
- Average project duration: X weeks
90,035 90,036 V – number of employees 90,037
- W – employee’s salary per week
- Project Planning: Y Weeks
- Project execution: Z weeks
90,036 N – number of projects per year 90,037
90,035 90,036 Cost of planning 1 project: V employees x W dollars x Y weeks
90,036 Cost of 1 project: V employees x W dollars x Z weeks
Compare these numbers before and after implementing the project management platform to calculate the amount saved.
3. The economic impact of improving the ability to cooperate, productivity and satisfaction of your employees
It’s no secret that team members need to be innovative in order to grow quickly. But very often the assigned tasks cause a lot of stress among employees. In a Wrike survey on the effects of stress in the workplace, 94% of employees admitted to being stressed at work, and one in three of them said their stress levels were high or even unbearable.The respondents also stated that high stress levels cause the following reactions in them:
- They are looking for another job
- They suffer from insomnia (which affects their ability to perform their duties)
- They become indifferent / “out of the process”
- Take unplanned vacations
- And so on!
Unsurprisingly, according to a survey by Kronos and Future Workplace, 87% of HR leaders see employee retention as a top concern.When employees quit, take time off, take unplanned vacation days, or simply cannot work at full capacity, it makes it difficult to complete projects and discourages the rest of the team. Colleagues have to wait for each other, work on the project stalls and the tension in the team grows.
A kind of chain reaction occurs, during which many employees may feel disconnected from the team. This leads to productivity losses, which, according to one study, cost American companies up to $ 550 billion a year.And American companies spend another $ 160 billion a year looking for talent in a highly competitive labor market.
But there is still a light at the end of the tunnel. According to our research, 63% of project management platform users consider themselves happy, while among professionals who do not use such a platform, the corresponding figure is 34%. Satisfied employees make 26% fewer blunders, burnout happens 79% less often, and they are 61% less likely to be fired than dissatisfied employees.
Employee satisfaction is closely related to profitability, and a project management platform can help you raise that level. But what exactly are the advantages of this platform?
- Centralized storage of project data and discussions maximizes information transparency and accountability.
- Team members spend less time searching for data and documents and more time doing useful work.
- Managers can more accurately estimate workload and not overload employees.
- Thanks to different viewing formats, you can display in a visual form the schedule of any project. This will help you more easily identify potential problems, plan future actions, track progress, and improve data transparency.
- @ Mentions feature helps team members to share information centrally and seek help from a leader in case of problems.
- Centralized communication minimizes the potential for misunderstandings that often arise during email communications.
- The possibilities are truly endless!
Wrike customer Airbnb provided an excellent example of employee satisfaction after implementing a project management platform. Before working with Wrike, Airbnb’s creative department used a giant online spreadsheet. It was not suitable for quick changes and creation of numerous versions, on which hundreds of users worked at the same time, did not allow managing complex processes and transfer of materials.After the introduction of Wrike, the level of productivity in the department increased dramatically. But the executives decided to do the research. They sent out questionnaires to team members and asked them to rate their experience before and after implementing Wrike. And here’s the result:
Profitability Estimate:
- After implementing the project management platform, interview employees. Assess the most important metrics using the Airbnb example. Or, create more detailed questions based on your workflows and challenges.Interview employees regularly to determine their level of satisfaction with workload, workflows, tools, etc.
- Ask Human Resources to monitor the retention rate over the next year. Use your company’s computational techniques to determine the cost of hiring a new talent, and convert to dollars the rate of employee turnover before and after implementing a project management platform.
4.Economic benefit from integration and automation
If you are distracted from work, it will take you about 30 minutes to regain concentration. Remember this number. If the employee you pay $ 100,000 a year only gets distracted twice a day, their unproductive work will cost you nearly $ 50 a day and $ 13,000 a year.
But with emails, chats, switching from one application to another, searching for documents, gathering information, meetings and chatting in the office, we are constantly distracted.The good thing is that a project management platform like Wrike minimizes the impact of these factors, saving you time and money. What’s the secret? Integration and automation.
According to a survey of professionals in the professional services sector, three out of ten respondents say they could increase the amount of work done by 30-39% if they could automate repetitive routine tasks. About one in five (22%) says they could increase the amount of work done by 50% or more.A project management platform like Wrike automates time-consuming chores: creating tasks, assigning performers, sending notifications, generating reports, etc.
For example, Wrike Templates are one of many ways to automate and streamline your workflow. Wrike customer Arvig has saved over 900 hours of work per year in onboarding new hires with Wrike forms and templates and the Wrike Integrate add-on. Multiply those hours by your employees’ salaries and you have a great ROI!
In addition, automation and integration make the exchange of information wonderfully simple.
Whether it’s about status updates, sharing information, reporting, and more, email is a challenge for the team. Fergus Adam, managing partner at creative agency Dare, said: “None of us anymore write project status reports for a year and a half, because everything is done automatically. We are saving a lot of time and the accuracy of design information has increased significantly. ” Both of these metrics can be measured in terms of the amount of time saved per employee and in terms of cost savings due to fewer errors.
According to Symantec, the average organization uses over 900 cloud-based applications to manage its processes. Another survey found that 68% of employees switch from one application to another at least 10 times within one hour and spend at least an hour a day on such transitions. Today’s teams use a myriad of tools, and the project management platform’s ability to integrate can help optimize both your technology mix and workflow.
A great example is OSF Healthcare’s use of the Wrike and Adobe Photoshop integration. Wrike made it easy for members of the OSF Healthcare creative team to upload documents to Wrike Proof to collect feedback that is linked to images and stored centrally. Andrea Bonk, Program Manager in Market Research, says: “Our team has been able to optimize working hours. We are working much more productively and have reduced the time for reviewing and approving our materials by at least half. “
There are many examples demonstrating the economic benefits of the project management platform’s ability to integrate. To learn more about Wrike Integration Tools, read the blog post: Wrike Integration Tools for High-Performance Teams.
Evaluation of profitability
Each team has its own goals, tools and challenges. For some, having a centralized repository for collecting feedback and approving submissions is a major time-saver.For others, it is moving away from email as a collaboration tool. For example, Esurance has estimated the financial impact of the time savings freed up by eliminating email communications.
Sabrina Wong, Project Manager at Esurance, says: “Before we got Wrike, we had to work on one of the very complex projects using only email. It seems to me that in a month we had about four hundred emails for each member of the team – that’s how much correspondence Wrike saved me from.Now that everyone is using Wrike and all their feedback is centralized, it’s incredibly easy to go back and find the answers to all your questions. And we no longer need to write 3000 letters for this ”.
To see the economic impact of the time savings, compare the time it takes to complete a task before and after implementing Wrike. If you’re using a project management platform to combine all of your tools, add the money saved to the equation.
Ready to improve your project management platform’s ROI?
Saving time and money, optimizing resources, improving the quality of life of employees, and so on.The benefits of a project management platform are invaluable, but we at Wrike are committed to accurately measuring progress and demonstrating best practice results.
When choosing the right way to measure profitability, ask yourself a few questions:
- Before the implementation of the project management platform:
- How do you manage projects? What tools do you use?
- How do you track and report on project progress?
- How much time does it take for you to complete projects and tasks and work together?
- Where do the difficulties arise during project management?
- What is the impact of these difficulties on economic performance, time spent, or quality of work?
- What opportunities were missed because of this?
- After the implementation of the project management platform:
- What are the positive consequences for the business in the current situation?
- What tools are you using now? Are you able to cut costs or measure the time saved?
- Did you manage to get rid of the difficulties during the workflow?
- What is the impact of the improvements achieved on the economic result, time spent or quality of work?
- What opportunities have you been able to take advantage of in your current situation?
Let’s dig even deeper! Wondering what the economic impact of implementing Wrike on your company might be?
Try our Wrike Profitability Calculator! Find out how much time and money Wrike is saving for you.
State University of Maritime and River Fleet named after Admiral S.O. Makarova
News not found
News
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
University
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
.
