Age group for youth. Youth Age Group: Definition, Challenges, and Global Impact

How is youth defined by the United Nations. What challenges do young people face globally. How can youth contribute to sustainable development. What initiatives support youth empowerment worldwide.

United Nations Definition of Youth

The United Nations, for statistical purposes, defines ‘youth’ as individuals between the ages of 15 and 24 years. This definition was established in preparation for the International Youth Year (1985) and endorsed by the General Assembly in 1981. It’s important to note that this definition is not universally agreed upon, and member states may have their own definitions.

While the UN uses this age range for youth, it’s worth considering how this definition interacts with other age-related classifications:

• Children are generally considered to be those under 14 years old
• The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child defines children as persons up to 18 years old
• Many countries set the ‘age of majority’ (legal adulthood) at 18

Why does the definition of youth vary between countries? The concept of youth is influenced by sociocultural, institutional, economic, and political factors unique to each nation. This flexibility allows for more nuanced approaches to youth-related policies and programs.

Global Youth Demographics and Projections

Understanding the size and growth of the youth population is crucial for developing effective policies and programs. Let’s examine the current state of the world’s youth:

• As of 2024, there are approximately 1.2 billion young people aged 15-24
• This represents about 16% of the global population
• By 2030, the youth population is projected to grow by 7% to nearly 1.3 billion

What does this demographic trend mean for global development? The growing youth population presents both challenges and opportunities. On one hand, it increases pressure on education systems, job markets, and social services. On the other hand, it offers a potential “demographic dividend” if young people are effectively engaged and empowered.

Key Challenges Facing Youth Worldwide

Young people today face a multitude of challenges that require urgent attention. Some of the most pressing issues include:

1. Access to quality education
2. Youth unemployment and underemployment
3. Health concerns, including mental health and sexual reproductive health
4. Gender inequality and discrimination
5. Climate change and environmental degradation
6. Political representation and civic engagement
7. Digital divide and technological inequalities

How are these challenges interconnected? Many of these issues compound one another. For example, lack of access to education can lead to unemployment, which in turn can contribute to health problems and social unrest. Addressing these challenges requires a holistic and integrated approach.

Youth as Agents of Change and Development

Despite the challenges they face, young people have immense potential to drive positive change in their communities and on a global scale. How can youth contribute to sustainable development?

• Innovation and entrepreneurship
• Advocacy for social and environmental causes
• Participation in decision-making processes
• Volunteerism and community service
• Cultural exchange and peacebuilding

What conditions are necessary for youth to thrive and contribute positively? Young people need access to quality education, skills training, and opportunities to enter the job market. Additionally, creating an enabling environment that values youth perspectives and encourages their participation in various sectors is crucial.

The Role of Education and Skills Development

Education plays a pivotal role in empowering youth and preparing them for the challenges of the 21st century. What skills are most critical for young people to acquire?

• Digital literacy and technological proficiency
• Critical thinking and problem-solving abilities
• Soft skills such as communication and teamwork
• Entrepreneurial mindset and financial literacy
• Adaptability and lifelong learning skills

How can education systems evolve to better serve youth needs? Integrating practical, skills-based learning with traditional academic subjects, promoting vocational training, and fostering partnerships between educational institutions and industries are some strategies to consider.

United Nations Youth Initiatives and Programs

The United Nations has long recognized the importance of youth engagement and has developed various initiatives to support young people worldwide. What are some key UN programs focused on youth?

• World Programme of Action for Youth (WPAY)
• UN Youth Strategy (Youth 2030)
• ECOSOC Youth Forum
• UN Youth Delegate Programme
• UN Inter-Agency Network on Youth Development

How does the World Programme of Action for Youth guide UN efforts? Adopted in 1995, WPAY provides a policy framework and practical guidelines for national action and international support across 15 youth priority areas. These areas include education, employment, hunger and poverty, health, environment, drug abuse, juvenile delinquency, leisure-time activities, girls and young women, and youth participation in society and decision-making.

International Youth Day and Its Significance

International Youth Day, observed annually on August 12th, plays a crucial role in bringing youth issues to the forefront of global discussions. How did this day come to be recognized?

In 1999, the UN General Assembly endorsed the recommendation made by the World Conference of Ministers Responsible for Youth to declare August 12th as International Youth Day. Each year, the day focuses on a different theme relevant to youth issues and celebrates young people’s potential as partners in global society.

What impact does International Youth Day have? The observance helps to:

• Raise awareness about youth challenges and opportunities
• Promote youth engagement in local and global initiatives
• Encourage intergenerational dialogue
• Highlight innovative youth-led projects and solutions

Historical Milestones in UN Youth Engagement

The United Nations’ commitment to youth has evolved over decades. What are some key milestones in the UN’s youth engagement history?

1. 1965: Endorsement of the Declaration on the Promotion among Youth of the Ideals of Peace, Mutual Respect and Understanding between Peoples
2. 1985: International Youth Year: Participation, Development and Peace
3. 1995: Adoption of the World Programme of Action for Youth
4. 2010: International Year of Youth
5. 2018: Launch of Youth 2030: The United Nations Youth Strategy

How has the UN’s approach to youth issues changed over time? There has been a shift from viewing youth as beneficiaries of programs to recognizing them as active partners and leaders in development. The focus has expanded from primarily addressing youth problems to harnessing youth potential and promoting their participation in decision-making processes.

Youth Participation in Global Governance

Engaging youth in global governance is crucial for ensuring that policies and decisions reflect the needs and aspirations of young people. How are youth involved in UN processes?

• Youth delegates to the UN General Assembly
• Participation in major UN conferences and summits
• Involvement in the implementation and review of the Sustainable Development Goals
• Youth advisory boards for various UN agencies and programs

What challenges exist in ensuring meaningful youth participation? Some obstacles include limited resources for youth engagement, tokenism, lack of diversity in youth representation, and the need for capacity building to enable effective participation.

The Role of Youth in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

Young people are key stakeholders in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. How can youth contribute to achieving the SDGs?

• Advocacy and awareness-raising
• Innovative solutions and social entrepreneurship
• Data collection and monitoring progress
• Grassroots implementation of SDG-related projects
• Holding governments and institutions accountable

What specific SDGs are particularly relevant to youth? While all 17 SDGs impact young people, some goals have particular significance, such as SDG 4 (Quality Education), SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), and SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Addressing Youth Unemployment: A Global Priority

Youth unemployment remains one of the most pressing challenges facing young people worldwide. What are the current trends in youth employment?

• Global youth unemployment rate is significantly higher than the overall unemployment rate
• Many employed youth are in informal or vulnerable employment
• Young women face higher rates of unemployment and underemployment than young men
• The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated youth employment challenges

What strategies can help address youth unemployment? Some approaches include:

1. Promoting skills development and vocational training
2. Encouraging youth entrepreneurship and self-employment
3. Implementing targeted youth employment policies and programs
4. Fostering partnerships between education institutions and employers
5. Addressing the school-to-work transition

The Gig Economy and Its Impact on Youth Employment

The rise of the gig economy has created new opportunities and challenges for young workers. How does the gig economy affect youth employment?

• Provides flexible work options and entry-level opportunities
• Can lead to precarious employment and lack of social protection
• Requires new skills and adaptability
• Challenges traditional notions of career progression

What policy measures are needed to ensure decent work in the gig economy? Policymakers need to consider updating labor laws, extending social protection to gig workers, and promoting skills development for the digital economy.

Youth and Digital Technologies: Opportunities and Risks

Digital technologies have transformed the way young people learn, work, and interact. What opportunities do digital technologies offer youth?

• Access to online education and skill-building resources
• New forms of civic engagement and activism
• Opportunities for digital entrepreneurship
• Global connectivity and cultural exchange
• Innovative tools for addressing social and environmental challenges

What risks do young people face in the digital realm? Some concerns include:

1. Cyberbullying and online harassment
2. Privacy and data protection issues
3. Digital addiction and mental health impacts
4. Exposure to misinformation and extremist content
5. Digital divides and inequalities in access

How can we maximize the benefits of digital technologies for youth while minimizing risks? A multi-stakeholder approach involving governments, tech companies, educators, and youth themselves is crucial. This includes promoting digital literacy, implementing robust online safety measures, and ensuring equitable access to digital resources.

Youth-Led Innovation in the Digital Age

Young people are at the forefront of digital innovation, developing solutions to various global challenges. What are some examples of youth-led digital initiatives?

• Mobile apps for education and health services
• Blockchain solutions for transparency and accountability
• Artificial intelligence applications for environmental monitoring
• Social media campaigns for social justice and human rights
• Crowdfunding platforms for youth-led projects

How can we foster an environment that supports youth innovation? Providing access to mentorship, funding opportunities, and spaces for collaboration can help nurture young innovators and entrepreneurs.

Mental Health and Well-being of Youth

Mental health is increasingly recognized as a critical issue affecting young people globally. What factors contribute to youth mental health challenges?

• Academic and career pressures
• Social media and digital stress
• Economic uncertainty and job insecurity
• Climate anxiety and environmental concerns
• Societal expectations and identity issues

How can we better support youth mental health? Some strategies include:

1. Integrating mental health education into school curricula
2. Increasing access to mental health services for young people
3. Promoting peer support and youth-led mental health initiatives
4. Addressing stigma surrounding mental health issues
5. Creating supportive environments in schools, workplaces, and communities

The Impact of Global Crises on Youth Well-being

Global crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have had significant impacts on youth well-being. How have recent crises affected young people?

• Disruptions to education and employment opportunities
• Increased social isolation and loneliness
• Exacerbation of existing mental health challenges
• Heightened economic insecurity and anxiety about the future
• Limited access to support services and recreational activities

What lessons can we learn from these crises to better support youth resilience? Building robust support systems, investing in digital infrastructure for education and mental health services, and involving youth in crisis response and recovery planning are crucial steps.

Youth Engagement in Climate Action and Environmental Sustainability

Young people are at the forefront of the global movement for climate action and environmental sustainability. How are youth contributing to environmental efforts?

• Leading climate strikes and awareness campaigns
• Developing innovative solutions for sustainability
• Advocating for stronger environmental policies
• Promoting sustainable lifestyles and consumption patterns
• Participating in reforestation and conservation projects

What challenges do young environmental activists face? Some obstacles include resistance from established interests, limited access to decision-making processes, and the psychological burden of eco-anxiety.

Empowering Youth for a Sustainable Future

How can we further empower young people to drive environmental change? Some strategies include:

1. Integrating environmental education into school curricula
2. Providing funding and resources for youth-led environmental projects
3. Ensuring youth representation in environmental policy-making
4. Promoting green skills and jobs for young people
5. Supporting intergenerational partnerships for sustainability

What role can international organizations play in supporting youth environmental engagement? The UN and other global bodies can provide platforms for youth voices, facilitate knowledge sharing, and advocate for youth inclusion in environmental decision-making processes.

Youth | United Nations

Who Are the Youth?

There is no universally agreed international definition of the youth age group. For statistical purposes, however, the United Nations—without prejudice to any other definitions made by Member States—defines ‘youth’ as those persons between the ages of 15 and 24 years. This definition, which arose in the context of preparations for the International Youth Year (1985) (see A/36/215), was endorsed by the General Assembly in its resolution 36/28 of 1981. All UN statistics on youth are based on this definition, as is reflected in the annual yearbooks of statistics published by the UN system on demography, education, employment and health.

This statistically oriented definition of youth, in turn, entails that children are considered those persons under the age of 14. Worthy of note, however, is that Article 1 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child defines ‘children’ as persons up to the age of 18. At the time, it was hoped that the Convention would provide protection and rights to as large an age-group as possible, especially as there was no similar document on the rights of youth.

Many countries also draw the line on youth with regard to the age at which a person is given equal treatment under the law—often referred to as the ‘age of majority.’ This age is commonly 18 in many countries; so that once a person attains this age, he or she is considered to be an adult. Nonetheless, the operational definition and nuances of the term ‘youth’ vary from country to country, depending on relative sociocultural, institutional, economic and political factors.

State of the World’s Youth

Today, there are 1.2 billion young people aged 15 to 24 years, accounting for 16 per cent of the global population. By 2030—the target date for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that make up the 2030 Agenda—the number of youth is projected to have grown by 7 per cent, to nearly 1. 3 billion.

As youth are increasingly demanding more just, equitable and progressive opportunities and solutions in their societies, the need to address the multifaceted challenges faced by young people (such as access to education, health, employment and gender equality) have become more pressing than ever.

Youth can be a positive force for development when provided with the knowledge and opportunities they need to thrive. In particular, young people should acquire the education and skills needed to contribute in a productive economy; and they need access to a job market that can absorb them into the labour force.

Learn more about the situation of young people around the world.

The United Nations youth agenda is guided by the World Programme of Action for Youth. The Programme of Action covers fifteen youth priority areas and contains proposals for action in each of these areas. Adopted by the General Assembly in 1995, it provides a policy framework and practical guidelines for national action and international support to improve the situation of young people around the world.  Learn more about the Programme of Action.

History of Youth at the UN

The United Nations has long recognized that the imagination, ideals and energy of young people are vital for the continuing development of the societies in which they live. Member States of the United Nations acknowledged this in 1965 when they endorsed the Declaration on the Promotion among Youth of the Ideals of Peace, Mutual Respect and Understanding between Peoples.

Two decades later, the United Nations General Assembly observed 1985 as the International Youth Year: Participation, Development and Peace. Celebration of the Year drew international attention to the important role that young people play in the world, and, in particular, to their potential contribution to development.

In 1995, on the tenth anniversary of the International Youth Year, the United Nations strengthened its commitment to young people. It adopted an international strategy: the World Programme of Action for Youth to the Year 2000 and Beyond, which directed the international community’s attention and channeled its response to the challenges that would be faced by youth in the next millennium.

In December 1999, in its resolution 54/120, the General Assembly endorsed the recommendation made by the World Conference of Ministers Responsible for Youth (Lisbon, 8-12 August 1998) that 12 August be declared International Youth Day. With a different focus each year, International Youth Day helps bring youth issues to the attention of the international community and celebrates the potential of youth as partners in today’s global society.

To coincide with the 25th anniversary of the first International Youth Year, the United Nations General Assembly, in December 2009, adopted resolution 64/134 proclaiming the year commencing 12 August 2010 as the International Year of Youth. The Assembly called on governments, civil society, individuals and communities worldwide to support activities at local and international levels marking the Year.

In 2015, the Security Council unanimously adopted resolution 2250, which encouraged States to consider setting up mechanisms that would enable young people to participate meaningfully as peacebuilders to prevent violence and generate peace around the world. As the first Security Council resolution wholly dedicated to the vital and positive role of young people in promoting international peace and security, this resolution clearly positions youth as important partners in global efforts in promoting peace and countering extremism.

In 2018, in resolution 2419, the Council reaffirmed the need to fully implement resolution 2250 and called on all relevant actors to consider ways to increase the representation of young people when negotiating and implementing peace agreements.

Youth and the SDGs

A central principle of the 2030 Agenda is the assurance that “no one will be left behind.” The Sustainable Development Goals are meant for all nations, all peoples of all ages and all societies. The universal nature of the 2030 Agenda entails that youth should be considered across all Goals and targets. Youth are specifically mentioned in four areas: youth employment, adolescent girls, education and sports for peace. Moreover, young people are recognized as agents of change, entrusted with fulfilling their own potential and ensuring a world fit for future generations.

While all the Sustainable Development Goals are critical to youth development, the realization of targets in areas of education and employment are underlined by the latest edition of the World Youth Report as fundamental to overall youth development.

Youth and SDG 4: Quality Education

Education is a fundamental right for youth everywhere. Sustainable Development Goal 4 calls for inclusive and equitable quality education and the promotion of lifelong learning opportunities for all. To achieve this, there is a need for concerted efforts to ensure that young women and men have access to free, equitable and quality education, as well as targeted training opportunities. The most recent statistics suggest that there are profound global disparities in education, leaving universal secondary education a tenuous aspiration for many, especially those in poorer nations.
Ensuring access to inclusive and equitable quality education is essential for successful transition into the labour force and attaining decent work, and is key to the achievement of many Sustainable Development Goals. Quality primary and secondary education should be complemented by affordable technical, vocational and tertiary education that provides youth with relevant skills for employment and entrepreneurship.

Youth and SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth

Sustainable Development Goal 8 contextualizes the call for decent work. For young people, the issues of unemployment, underemployment and poor job quality have proven to be persistent and daunting. Youth are three times more likely to be unemployed than adults, with the global youth unemployment rate at 13 per cent in 2017. Many young people are engaged in low-paying, precarious or informal work. The challenges of securing and retaining decent work are even more serious and complex for vulnerable and marginalized youth, including young women, those living in humanitarian settings, youth with disabilities, migrant youth, and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth.

Youth in architecting and implementing the 2030 Agenda

Young people may be called the ‘torchbearers’ of the 2030 Agenda, since they have a pivotal role to play not just as beneficiaries of actions and policies under the Agenda, but rather as partners and participants in its implementation. Indeed, young people have been architects in the development of the 2030 Agenda, and remain engaged in the frameworks and processes that support its implementation, follow-up and review.

The adoption of the 2030 Agenda represented the culmination of an extensive three-year process involving Member States and civil society, including youth organizations, in the development of specific goals and targets.

Youth well-being, participation and empowerment are key drivers of sustainable development and peace around the world. Achieving the 2030 Agenda requires strong and inclusive partnerships between young people and all stakeholders, so that the development challenges facing youth (such as unemployment, political exclusion, marginalization, problematic access to education and health etc.) are addressed and the positive role of youth as partners in promoting development and sustaining peace is recognized.

Young people have been at the forefront of activities and initiatives aimed at furthering the 2030 Agenda and meeting the Goals. Youth are engaged in a myriad of ways including awareness-raising, data collection and use, grass-roots and national initiatives, monitoring and accountability efforts, and shadow reporting on progress.

United Nations for Youth

On the basis of its global convening role, the United Nations is uniquely placed to act as a source of protection and support for young people, and to provide a platform through which their needs can be addressed, their voice can be amplified, and their engagement can be advanced.

The UN Programme on Youth of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), which serves as the focal point on youth in the United Nations, builds awareness of the global situation of young people; promotes their rights and aspirations; and helps increase their participation in decision-making as a means of achieving peace and development. DESA coordinates the participation of youth delegates in the General Assembly and ECOSOC system, where Governments regularly include young people in their official delegations.

The Secretary-General appointed his Envoy on Youth in January 2013 and a Special Envoy on Youth Unemployment in September 2016. Together the youth envoys work to increase youth accessibility to the United Nations.

DESA prepares the World Youth Report, a biennial publication shining a spotlight on key areas of youth development.

The ECOSOC Youth Forum is a yearly event that provides a platform for young people to voice their needs and concerns through informal dialogue with other stakeholders—in particular Member States—and to explore ways to promote youth development at all levels. The Forum represents the most institutionalized venue for youth participation in UN deliberations and is an important vehicle to mobilize support among young people for implementing the 2030 Agenda.

Youth and the UN System

In 2012, the United Nations Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) discussed the topic of youth and sustainable development in light of the confluence of events during the Arab spring and in preparation for the Rio+20 conference. Executive Heads exchanged views on the various dimensions of programmatic issues affecting youth, including youth employment, political inclusion, health and education. The Board emphasized the importance of greater UN system coordination in support of youth development.

Subsequently, UN-DESA and UN-HABITAT led the Inter-Agency Network on Youth and Development (IANYD)  in preparing the System-wide Action Plan on Youth (Youth-SWAP). Endorsed by the CEB in April 2013, Youth-SWAP focuses on joint action by the UN system on the issues of employment and entrepreneurship, political inclusion, civic engagement and protection of rights, education (including sexuality education), and health.

In November 2015 the CEB endorsed the strategy for the Global Initiative on Decent Jobs for Youth, a UN system-wide effort to promote youth employment worldwide.

Resources

What Age Range Is Considered a Young Adult?

Cake’s blog posts contain affiliate links and we earn commission from purchases made through these links. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

When you see the term “young adult,” do you wonder whether or not you fit within that definition? If asked what age range is considered “young adult,” would you know the answer?

Whether or not you’re a young adult might depend on who you ask. For example, medicine and psychology have a different definition of “young adult” than the government. And that makes it even more complicated to figure out what, exactly, a young adult really is. 

If you’re unsure of the definition of “young adult” and how it might apply to you, consider the information included here. 

Young Adult Age Ranges

Depending on who you ask, the “young adult” age range could refer to people aged 12 to 18, or it could refer to those aged 18 to 30. In general, young adults are people between the ages of 12 and 30. For a more specific number, however, it all comes down to context. 

According to medicine and psychology

The fields of medicine and psychology have their own unique views of what it means to be a young adult.  

• Psychology. One of the most influential psychologists on the topic of life stages, Erik Erikson, defined young adulthood as a crucial stage that happens after adolescence. It’s the point in life when a person emphasizes “identity formation.”
  • Based on Erikson’s research, most people reach this stage between the ages of 19 and 39. But because individuals reach this point at different ages, due to a number of factors, there’s no absolute timeline for young adulthood, according to Erikson. 
•  Medicine. In the field of health, medicine, and human development, young adulthood is the time when a person is traditionally the most healthy. It’s the stage between adolescence and adulthood, which roughly falls between the ages of 15 and 29. 

Post-planning tip: If you are the executor for a deceased loved one who passed too soon, the emotional and technical aspects of handling their unfinished business can be overwhelming without a way to organize your process. We have a post-loss checklist that will help you ensure that your loved one’s family, estate, and other affairs are taken care of.

According to the government

There’s a more concrete way of determining what “young adult” really means: asking the government. The government has to define “young adult” or “early adulthood” for statistical record-keeping, as well as for law enforcement. 

Children face lesser charges for crimes than adults, and the “young adult” age range falls somewhere in between. Therefore, it’s important that law enforcement understands what to do with people in that range. 

But different states, counties, and countries define young adulthood differently. Additionally, young adults are defined differently by various sectors in the U.S. government. 

The Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics describes young adults as individuals aged 18-24. 

The United Nations, however, defines “youth” as persons aged 15 to 24.  

According to popular culture

In popular culture and in casual use, “young adult” is often a euphemism for a teenager or adolescent. 

The euphemistic use of the term “young adult” first appeared in the 20th century. There was a growing reluctance, during this time, to refer to adolescents as children, or even as teenagers. 

Instead, it was often preferable to emphasize an adolescent’s developing sense of adulthood and responsibility. You could do so by using terms like “young man,” young woman” or “young lady,” and “young adult.” 

In this euphemistic sense, the phrase “young adult” in popular culture typically refers to people in their teens: aged 13 to 20. 

According to libraries

Another common usage of the term “young adult” is in the library category known as “young adult literature.” In fact, this is where many people first stumble upon the term “young adult” in the first place. 

Young adult literature targets readers aged 12 to 18 and includes books like Harry Potter, The Fault in Our Stars, and The Giver. If you’ve ever visited a library, you’ll know that the Young Adult Literature section is one of the most popular. But the category known as “young adult literature” is relatively new. 

The term “young adult” in reference to literature first appeared in 1957 when the American Library Association formed its own Young Adult Services Division. The new division focused on serving a newly-targeted population of “teenagers” (a term that first appeared in the 1930s) and “young adults.” 

According to research and science

So what does science have to say about young adulthood? With so many potential age ranges floating around, it seems like scientific study should be able to narrow down when, exactly, young adulthood actually occurs. According to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), young adulthood is generally defined as 18 to 22 or 18 to 25. 

Researchers have nailed down young adulthood as a biologically essential time period. When teenagers enter young adulthood, some major changes take place. 

They develop greater thinking capacities, emotional regulation capabilities, and relationship skills. In fact, the growth that takes place in young adulthood is now thought to parallel that which takes place in childhood and adolescence. 

Young Adults in Modern Culture

Our world is forever changing and evolving, and so is our definition of “young adult.” What it means to become an adult varies depending on regional culture and law. Even within families, children might reach adulthood at different speeds. 

Ultimately, your definition of a young adult depends on the context you’re in, and what you find most true about your own coming-of-age experience. 

Sources

1. Erikson, Erik H. “Childhood and Society.” Penguin. 1975.  ISBN 978-0-14-020754-5.
2. “Young adult (psychology).” Psychology Wiki. psychology.wikia.org/wiki/Young_adult_(psychology)
3. Cart, Michael. “How ‘young adult’ fiction blossomed with teenage culture in America.” Smithsonian Magazine. 7 May 2018.  www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/how-young-adult-fiction-blossomed-with-teenage-culture-in-america-180968967/
4. “American’s young adults.” ChildStats.gov. www.childstats.gov/pdf/ac2014/YA_14.pdf
5. “Youth.” United Nations.www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/youth-0/index.html
6. “Changes in young adulthood.” Young Adult Learning Project (MIT). hr.mit.edu/static/worklife/youngadult/changes.html#young

• Number of U.S. youth and young adult population by age 2019

• Number of U.S. youth and young adult population by age 2019 | Statista

Please create an employee account to be able to mark statistics as favorites.
Then you can access your favorite statistics via the star in the header.

Register now

Please authenticate by going to “My account” → “Administration”.
Then you will be able to mark statistics as favourites and use personal statistics alerts.

Authenticate

Save statistic in .XLS format

You can only download this statistic as a Premium user.

Save statistic in .PNG format

You can only download this statistic as a Premium user.

Save statistic in .PDF format

You can only download this statistic as a Premium user.

Show source references

As a Premium user you get access to the detailed source references and background information about this statistic.

Show details about this statistic

As a Premium user you get access to background information and details about the release of this statistic.

Bookmark statistics

As soon as this statistic is updated, you will immediately be notified via e-mail.

Yes, save as favorite!

…and make my research life easier.

Change statistics options

You need at least a Single Account to use this feature.

Basic Account

Get to know the platform

You only have access to basic statistics.

This statistic is not included in your account.

Single Account

The ideal entry-level account for individual users

• Instant access to 1m statistics
• Download in XLS, PDF & PNG format
• Detailed references

$59 $39 / Month *

in the first 12 months

Corporate Account

Full access

Corporate solution including all features.

* Prices do not include sales tax.

The most important statistics

The most important statistics

The most important statistics

The most important statistics

Further related statistics

Learn more about how Statista can support your business.

US Census Bureau. (June 17, 2020). Number of U.S. youth and young adult population from 2010 to 2019, by age group (in millions) [Graph]. In Statista. Retrieved August 23, 2021, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/221852/number-of-youth-and-young-adult-population-in-the-us/

US Census Bureau. “Number of U.S. youth and young adult population from 2010 to 2019, by age group (in millions).” Chart. June 17, 2020. Statista. Accessed August 23, 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/221852/number-of-youth-and-young-adult-population-in-the-us/

US Census Bureau. (2020). Number of U.S. youth and young adult population from 2010 to 2019, by age group (in millions). Statista. Statista Inc.. Accessed: August 23, 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/221852/number-of-youth-and-young-adult-population-in-the-us/

US Census Bureau. “Number of U.S. Youth and Young Adult Population from 2010 to 2019, by Age Group (in Millions).” Statista, Statista Inc., 17 Jun 2020, https://www. statista.com/statistics/221852/number-of-youth-and-young-adult-population-in-the-us/

US Census Bureau, Number of U.S. youth and young adult population from 2010 to 2019, by age group (in millions) Statista, https://www.statista.com/statistics/221852/number-of-youth-and-young-adult-population-in-the-us/ (last visited August 23, 2021)

Adolescence (15-17 years old) | CDC

CDC’s Adolescent and School Mental Health
Learn how connection is key to good adolescent mental health.

CDC’s Parent Information (Teens 12— 19)
This site has information to help you learn how to guide your teen to be safe and become a healthy and productive adult.

CDC’s Healthy Weight Information.
Tips for parents – Ideas to help children maintain a healthy weight.

CDC’s Youth Physical Activity Guidelines
This site has information on how to help children be active and play.

CDC’s Pregnancy Prevention for Teens.
Tips and information especially for teens and designed with input from teens.

CDC’s BAM! Body and Mind
CDC’s BAM! Body and Mind is a website designed for kids 9 through 13 years of age, to give them the information they need to make healthy lifestyle choices. The site focuses on topics that kids told us are important to them—such as stress and physical fitness—using kid-friendly lingo, games, quizzes, and other interactive features.

CDC’s Information on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth Health
Learn about the physical and mental health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth

American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatryexternal icon
The American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry has many fact sheets for parents on child and adolescent health and development.

My Plate – Teenexternal icon
The U.S. Department of Agriculture provides information on health and nutrition for teens.

HealthyChildren.orgexternal icon
AAP’s Healthy Children website provides information on feeding, nutrition, and fitness for all developmental stages from infancy to young adulthood.

Just in Time Parentingexternal icon (JITP)
Quality, research-based information to families at the time it can be most useful.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administrationexternal icon (NHTSA)
NHTSA has information on safety recalls and safety tips for children riding in motor vehicles, walking, biking, playing outside, waiting at school bus stops, and more.

National Institute of Mental Healthexternal icon
The National Institute of Mental Health has information on mental disorders affecting children and adolescents, including anxiety and depression.

StopBullying.govexternal icon
StopBullying.gov provides information from various government agencies on how children, parents, educators, and others in the community can prevent or stop bullying.

SAMHSA’s KnowBullying appexternal icon
A free app for parents to help prevent bullying, created by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Agency (SAMHSA).

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)external icon
SAMHSA works to improve the quality and availability of substance abuse prevention, alcohol and drug addiction treatment, and mental health services.

Teens Healthexternal icon
Visit this site for information on healthy eating and exercise for children and teenagers.

Youth and Youth/Adult Hunts – Drawn Hunts

On This Page

Hunter Education

Requirements on Public Lands:

Please note that the Hunter Education requirement for supervision is different from the statewide requirement.

Adult supervision of youth is required during public hunts. Youth under 17 years old are required to be under the immediate supervision of a permitted adult, at lease18 years old, who is licensed to hunt in Texas.

• Youth under 12 years old must remain within normal voice distance of an adult supervisor (direct supervision).

• For youth ages 12 to 16 who have received Hunter Education Certification, the requirement for immediate supervision is relaxed to the extent that the supervising adult is required only to be present on the area.

Youth only hunts

1. Special Permit Categories:

   • Youth applicants must be 8 to 16 years old at the time of application.

   • Youth applicants must apply with a non-hunting supervising adult who is at least 18 years old.

   • During these hunts, only the youth will be allowed to hunt.

   • An adult may supervise multiple youth hunters, however, there may not be more than one adult per youth.

   • All youth hunters under 12 years of age must be directly supervised by an adult and remain within normal voice distance.

   • Failure of the parent or guardian to properly supervise youth hunters will be cause for forfeiture of the permits of both adult and youth hunters.

   • You may apply for up to 3 areas within each category but only once at each area within the category.

   • The application and permit fees are waived for all participants in the youth only hunts.

2. US Forest Service Antlerless Deer Permits:

   • Applicants must be under 17 years old. There is no minimum age requirement.

   • Each person must submit their own application, including youth. No Supervising adult is required on a youth’s application.

   • You may apply only once in this category.

   • The supervising adult must have a valid Annual Public Hunting Permit.

3. E-Postcard Selection Hunts:

   • Youth applicants must be under 17 years old. Except federal age requirements for the Youth Waterfowl Season define a youth as someone 15 years old or younger at the time of the hunt.

   • You may apply for multiple areas within each category but only once at each area within the category. Application in Youth categories are limited to 3 areas.

   • Participation in these hunts requires each adult hunter and supervising adult to possess a valid Annual Permit Hunting Permit.

4. National Wildlife Refuge Hunts:

   • Youth applicants must be 9 to 16 years old at the time of application.

   • Youth applicants must apply with a non-hunting supervising adult who is at least 18 years old.

   • During these hunts, only the youth will be allowed to hunt.

   • All youth hunters under 12 years of age must be directly supervised by an adult and remain within normal voice distance.

   • You may apply for multiple areas within each category but only once at each area within the category.

   • The application and permit fees are waived for all participants in the youth only hunts.

Youth/Adult Hunts

E-Postcard Selection Hunts:

• Youth applicants must be under 17 years old. Except federal age requirements for the Youth Waterfowl Season define a youth as someone 15 years old or younger.

• You may apply for up to 3 areas within each category but only once at each area within a category.

• Each application/hunting party must contain at least one youth participant.

• All selected participants (youth and adults) will be allowed to hunt.

• Number of applicants per application may vary depending on the group size needed.

• Participation in these hunts requires each adult hunter and supervising adult to possess a valid Annual Permit Hunting Permit.

Youth Hockey Levels, Explained | Pure Hockey

What are the youth hockey levels? New hockey parents have probably heard the terms Midget, Squirt, Peewee, and a host of other words that may or may not indicate what level of youth ice hockey their child is supposed to join. “Tyke,” for example, is a term often used to size youth ice skates but was never an age classification. If you thought it was, though, who could blame you? After all, one dad’s squirt is another mom’s tyke.

For many, the old terms were confusing: is a squirt older than a peewee? Is a bantam younger or older than a midget? The nomenclature seemed more decorative than meaningful. As of 2016, however, USA Hockey no longer uses the old terms to designate hockey age groups—to the chagrin of many nostalgic and seasoned hockey parents and to the relief of almost everyone else.

USA YOUTH HOCKEY LEVELS

Since the changes were made official in 2016, many parents may already be up to speed with the current classifications. The new youth hockey levels are essentially the same—only the names are different. For those who might not know what they missed out on, here’s a quick rundown of the youth hockey age groups and the names formerly associated with them:

PRE-2016 USA HOCKEY YOUTH LEVELS

• Mini Mite (ages 5-6)
• Mite (ages 7-8)
• Squirt (ages 9-10)
• Peewee (ages 11-12)
• Bantam (ages 13-14)
• Minor Midget 16 and Under (ages 15-16) (high school junior varsity)
• Major Midget 18 and Under (ages 15-18) (high school varsity)

It’s hard to deny the charm of the old terms, even if it’s counterintuitive to think of a “midget” as the oldest age group. It required a certain amount of rote learning to master the classifications because there was no obvious correlation between the name and the age group.

Now USA Hockey has boldly broken with tradition and made the classifications more rational.

CURRENT USA HOCKEY YOUTH HOCKEY AGE GROUPS

The new age classifications are as follows:

• Age Category: 8 – Age Division: 8 or Under (8U)
• Age Category: 9-10 – Age Division: 10 or Under (10U)
• Age Category: 11-12 – Age Division: 12 or Under (12U)
• Age Category: 13-14 – Age Division: 14 or Under (14U)
• Age Category: 15-16 – Age Division: 16 & Under (16U)
• Age Category: 17-18 – Age Division: 18 & Under (18U)

Girls’ and women’s teams also now use similar classifications—the difference is that the oldest category tops out at 19 years old instead of 18:

• Age Category: 8 & Under – Age Division: 8 or Under (8U)
• Age Category: 9-10 – Age Division: 10 or Under (10U)
• Age Category: 11-12 – Age Division: 12 or Under (12U)
• Age Category: 13-14 – Age Division: 14 or Under (14U)
• Age Category: 15-16 – Age Division: 16 or Under (16U)
• Age Category: 17-19 – Age Division: 19 or Under (19U)

Each age division is subdivided into skill levels: A, AA, and AAA, with single-A being the lowest and triple-A the highest levels. Level classifications are not changed from the previous system. What the new system loses in color, it gains in clarity. And clarity is a good thing, particularly in the world of youth ice hockey and youth sports generally that have grown increasingly complex and professionalized.

Note that the youth hockey levels are based on age—everyone in 14U is 14 or under. But kids’ hockey equipment categories are based on size—a player on a 14 U team might wear junior,intermediate, or senior skates.

CANADIAN YOUTH HOCKEY LEVELS

Our neighbors to the north take their hockey seriously, too. Their classification system, in its basic form, still uses a series of terms similar to the old US system, with some provinces, like Quebec, using their own classifications.

MINOR HOCKEY

Minor hockey is for every child who plays for a local association. Their classifications are:

• Hockey 1 to 4: Age 6-9
• Atom: Age 9-10
• Pee Wee: Age 11-12
• Bantam: Age 13-14
• Midget: Age 15-17
• Juvenile: Age 18-19

Additionally, elite youth players ages 16-20 can play in the following Junior leagues:

• Major Junior (WHL, OHL QMJHL): Most top players choose this league. They are paid a small compensation and live mostly in small, provincial towns where they play only hockey and do little else. They travel throughout the country, playing other Major Junior teams in the three leagues. Because these players are paid, they’re not eligible to play NCAA hockey.
• Junior A: In this unpaid level of play, players mostly play throughout their province and can still play college hockey if they choose to.
• Junior B: Another choice for players who might choose to play college hockey; players in Junior B generally play closer to their homes.

Other hockey-playing countries around the world have their own classifications. Today’s youth hockey is a highly organized and competitive pursuit, particularly at the upper levels. It’s not any less competitive thanks to USA Hockey’s classification changes, but now parents should have a much easier time signing up their child for the correct age division.

Young Adult Development Project

Dramatic Change

A large and relatively new body of research is revealing that young adulthood is a time of dramatic change in basic thinking structures, as well as in the brain. Consensus is emerging that an 18-year-old is not the same person she or he will be at 25, just as an 11-year-old is not the same as he or she will be at 18. They don’t look the same, feel the same, think the same, or act the same.

Three Categories

Across theories and research frameworks, a sequence of developmental shifts emerges, which can be organized into three overall categories:

• Adolescence (generally defined as puberty through age 18)
• Young adulthood (generally defined as 18 to 22 or 18 to 25)
• Later adulthood (generally defined as mid-20s and older)

Many researchers and theorists divide these three broad areas into several smaller shifts, depending on the aspect of development they are measuring, such as reflective judgment, moral development, or cognitive structural development. There remains much division within and between disciplines, but, at the broader level, they share significant common ground.

The Mental Visor

Fundamentally, what changes in these developmental shifts is not just what people think, but also what they think about. Everyone, including young adults, has a kind of mental “visor” that screens out some kinds of phenomena while letting in others for consideration. As development unfolds, one can “see” and think about more and more complex phenomena such as abstractions, relationships, and moral problems, offering more and more powerful thinking tools.

Why does development happen? Most researchers see a role both for nature and nurture. In healthy people, some changes evolve on a biological timetable, as long as the environment is “good enough,” and some changes are prompted by demands in the environment, as long as the biological underpinnings are “good enough.”

When teens enter young adulthood, their thinking capacities, relationship skills, and ability to regulate emotions are unlikely to be at a developmental level where they can cope easily with the demands of a diverse, global, technological, rapidly-changing world. If all goes well, biology and environment bring a surge of growth paralleling those of childhood and adolescence.

An Emerging Field

Acknowledging these findings, researchers have begun to define young adulthood as its own developmental period, referring to it as “emerging adulthood,” “the frontier of adulthood,” or, earlier, “the novice phase.” Here at the start of the 21st century, researchers are creating a new field around young adulthood, just as, at the turn of the 20th century, researchers defined a new field around adolescence.

Much of the impetus and focus for the research has come from the lengthening period in the U.S. between the onset of puberty and the fulfilling of cultural expectations around adult roles like financial independence and family formation. Significant differences can be expected across culture and circumstance.

90,000 Age limits of youth ”Sociology of youth. Electronic encyclopedia

Age limits of youth – 1) adopted in this society normative
age perceptions,
which is attributed to a young man, youth; 2) installed in
research practice quantitative limits (interval) of age for allocation
youth as an object of research.

In the first meaning, the age limits of young people have
clearly expressed socio-cultural content: in different cultures, models of youth
by age parameters can vary significantly.This is usually the result
social practices that make up the way of life in a given society. In primitive societies, in
which the main social practices are mastered by new generations from the demonstration of the elders and in joint with the elders
actions, setting the boundaries of the age of young people does not make much sense: the transition to
adulthood is symbolized by initiation, which is quite early in terms of European-American
civilization (14-15
years for young men). Thus,
there is a transition from childhood to adulthood without a special stage,
corresponding to the social status of young people (although this model has
variations).

In societies, in
which the development of basic social practices presupposes a rather long and
a specialized learning process, a special status of social youth is formed,
which is also reflected in the legal form, this
situation, the establishment of the age of the boundaries of youth is recognized as significant not only at the everyday level (everyday ideas in one or
different culture regarding who is considered young – different for girls
and young men), but also at the level of legal norms.Anchoring problem
in the legal norms, the age limits of youth arose in countries where a law on youth was developed and
other acts constituting legislation
about youth. UN documents include age
boundaries of youth from 15 to 25 years old. In the legislation of different countries, these boundaries
may differ significantly. So, in Cuba, the upper age limit for
youth are recognized as 35 years old. In Russian legislation, the lower limit
youth age has not been established (although from the norms of criminal, labor,
administrative law can be inferred as corresponding to a 14 year old
age), the upper limit is set at 30 years, and for some categories
it is higher for young people (for young scientists, for example., 33 years)
or below (the draft age for young men ends upon reaching 27 years of age). A substantial
the age limit is the age of majority. This border dismembers the youth
into two age groups differing in their legal status. This one
the border also has a socio-cultural origin and can change. So, in
Russia of the XIX century. the border of majority was 21 years old, in modern Russia – 18
years. The process of social transition characteristic of young people in a complex way
associated with age and – depending on socio-cultural conditions – may take
sometimes negligible, sometimes quite long time, and not only in different types
society, but also in one society.In this respect, cannot be established
such age limits of youth that could be recognized objectively
inherent in young people in general.

In the second
the importance of age limits for young people is a subject of fierce controversy
researchers of youth problems, in fact, since the formation of generalized
scientific ideas about youth and youth. In this case, no less than
external boundaries separating youth from other social groups, in
research practice have internal boundaries associated with the allocation of
general group of youth age subgroups.The number of such subgroups, age
interval, and most importantly – the basis for differentiation in different concepts of youth
and in research practice can vary markedly. So, in the first
generalizing works about youth Sh.
Buhler and E. Spranger are recognized as the boundaries of youth age from 13
up to 19 years old for girls and from 14 to 20 years old for boys, and at the age of 17
it is the end of the adolescent phase and the beginning of the adolescence phase.

In Russian sociology of youth, the problem of age
the boundaries of youth has generated one of the most lively debates regarding
a way of separating youth from other groups of people.Since the approach prevailed,
according to which youth is a socio-demographic group, discussion
on the age limits of youth has become one of the central. At about one
time (late 1960s – early 1970s) I.A. Gromov, S.
N. Ikonnikova and V.T. Lisovsky showed that as
age limits for Soviet youth can be taken 15 years (lower) and
25 years old (top), using virtually the same arguments, Ikonnikova determined
age limits of 16 and 30 years, and V.N. Boryaz – 14 and 35 years old, see: (Gromov,
Ikonnikova, Lisovsky, 1969; Boryaz, 1973: 148; Ikonnikova, 1974: 53). V
end 1990s the problem remained open, and the authors of works on youth solved
her in different ways. So, B.A.Ruchkin proposed to conditionally divide
the general age interval of young people (15-29 years old) into three stages: adolescents – up to 18 years old, young people
– 18-24 years old, “young adults” – 25-29
years (there is a noticeable return at a new stage to the conceptual developments of Sh.
Buhler, E.Spranger, much later L. Rosenmayr, and in the domestic
sociology – V.N.Boryaza). Of interest is the selection by Ruchkin against the background
this age classification of what is called the sociocultural generation (Ruchkin,
1998: 21). Appeal to legal and
professional aspects of growing up leads P.I.Babochkin to the establishment of age
youth boundaries ranging from 14 to 28
years (Babochkin, 1998: 27–28). G. S. Entelis concludes that “today … it is already possible
talk about the social group “youth” in the range of 14-24
years ”(Entelis, 1998: 46).

Acceptance
some of the rules for setting the age limits of young people are dictated by the tasks
comparison of empirical research data on youth issues.
However, this has not been achieved for a number of reasons. 1. There is no objective
age indicator for young people, and in this regard it is indicative that in different
cultures to the concept of youth include people of different ages. 2. The concept itself
youth is a generalization applied only in appropriate contexts; v
in particular, it is devoid of gender differentiation, and the youth age for young men
and girls in all known cultures differs in both quantitative and
quality attributes.3. For research purposes, uniform age
the boundaries of youth can only be established in a conventional way, therefore
the development of unifying institutional forms in the field of sociology matters
youth, but in modern domestic practice this has not yet happened, and
sociology of youth develops as a collection of rather distanced friends
from a friend of schools and directions. 4. Logic of research of different groups of young people
often dictates the use of their scales when setting age limits
youth and makes it pointless to rely on some kind of standardized solution.

Lit. .: Gromov, I. A., Ikonnikova, S. N., Lisovsky,
V.T. (1969) Youth in society // Man and society: Social problems
youth. Issue VI / under total. ed. B.G. Ananyeva, D.A.Kerimova. L.: Publishing house
Leningrad. un-that; Boryaz, V.N. (1973) Youth: Methodological
research problems. L.: Science. 155 p .; Ikonnikova, S.N. (1974) Youth:
Sociological and socio-psychological analysis. L.: Publishing house Leningrad. un-that.
166 s.; Ruchkin, B.A. (1998) What
is “Russian youth”? // Methodological problems of research
youth: Materials for discussion / SIC at Ying-those youth. M .; Babochkin, P.I. (1998) Youth in the structure of modern
Russian society // Ibid. M .; Entelis, G.S. (1998) Age and
age limits of the category “youth” // Ibid. M .; Kovaleva, A.I., Lukov, V.A. (1999)
Sociology of Youth: Theoretical Issues. M.: Society. 351 s.

Shaft.A. Lukov

90,000 These are your years: the age of youth in Russia will be raised to 35 | Articles

Citizens from 14 to 35 years old will officially be considered youth in Russia. As Izvestia found out, such a framework will be established by the first ever law “On youth policy in the Russian Federation”. On November 24, his project will be considered by the State Duma. All parliamentary factions and the government are ready to support the document. The Public Chamber is concerned that the new age limits will confuse the status of children, which, according to the Family Code, Russians are considered under 18 years of age.Also, social activists propose to exclude an indication of the place of residence from the criteria of the youth law.

Stopped at 35

In 2021, the youth policy in Russia will be radically updated. According to Izvestia, the State Duma is almost unanimously ready to support a document that will define in federal legislation such concepts as “youth”, “young family”, “youth public associations”, and others, thereby securing the status of citizens belonging to “youth “.She is invited to consider the socio-demographic group of persons aged 14 to 35 years old who have Russian citizenship, permanent residence in Russia or living abroad.

Photo: RIA Novosti / Vladimir Fedorenko

– We supported this bill, because it is very important and necessary, because today there is no federal law “On youth policy” in Russia. Therefore, it is not just an initiative. It defines many key concepts that will regulate the life of young people, ”Boris Paikin, head of the profile committee for physical culture, sports, tourism and youth affairs, told Izvestia.

According to him, if we talk about the age of youth, which is proposed to be established by the bill, today each region is guided by its own limit: somewhere it is 30 years, somewhere 32 years.

– We stopped at 35 years, based on the surveys conducted, focusing on public opinion. This is the maximum age that allows young people to meet the criteria. Now all persons from 14 to 35 years old will be able to receive certain benefits that are established by our legislation.Until now, there have been cases when a young family applied, for example, for compensation for the purchase of housing, but she was refused, since the spouses were over 32 years old. Now everything is clear and understood, especially since there are a lot of benefits, – the parliamentarian emphasized.

Photo: RIA Novosti / Konstantin Mikhalchevsky

He noted that the law had been discussed for a very long time by the government, the State Duma and the Federation Council, but on the age criterion, everyone was unanimous.Although there were many other proposals for other norms, which may be taken into account later.

– This is still the first law, so there are a lot of wishes for it. But we understand that if you overload it now and take into account all your wishes, you will just get a heap that won’t work, ” explained Boris Paikin.

The government is also ready to support the document, however, taking into account the revision for the second reading. In its response (available to Izvestia), the Cabinet of Ministers also pointed out the need to include in the main directions of youth policy the formation and development of environmental thinking, respect for work, social activity, creative thinking, the desire for knowledge and self-development, and others.In addition, the government proposes to think over and reflect in the document measures of state support for young families, as well as young people who are not in spousal relationships.

Possibility of financing

As Izvestia found out, this bill has become one of the few that are ready to support in all factions of the State Duma.

– The history of the adoption of the bill on youth policy is very old. Even when Boris Yeltsin was president of the Russian Federation, it was developed by the Communist Party faction and the deputy group “People’s Power”.The State Duma passed it, but the president vetoed it. Then they tried to adopt it in the fifth convocation of parliament (2007-2011). Then I was a member of the youth policy committee. It was developed by representatives of different factions, but, unfortunately, it did not receive support in the presidential administration, – explained the deputy from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, co-author of the bill Yuri Afonin.

Member of the Communist Party faction Yuri Afonin

Photo: RIA Novosti / Ilya Pitalev

According to him, now the document is supported by all factions, including the communists.However, it is still a framework one and it is necessary to introduce a number of provisions into it that would protect the rights and guarantees of young people.

– You can support, because the bill is really important. But as for age, I personally think it is better to do it the way it was in the USSR – 28 years. Still, at 35 years old, he is already an adult and mature person, half of his life has already passed, and he still walks young. This is wrong, – said Mikhail Yemelyanov, first deputy chairman of the Just Russia faction, in a conversation with Izvestia.

But the deputy chairman of the LDPR faction, Yaroslav Nilov, on the contrary, considers the proposed age to be optimal.

– Some of the young people who can count on support measures and, for example, participate in the “young family” housing program, today cannot take advantage of them due to unclear age criteria. In addition, the retirement age in Russia has increased, why not raise the youth age in this case? – the Liberal Democrat declared to Izvestia.

According to him, the need to adopt this law is long overdue, but the main thing, of course, is that it should not be a declaration, but a really working tool that would reset youth policy.

– Although this bill does not directly relate to changes to the Constitution, but now there are lines about youth policy. Consequently, there is a need to adopt a federal framework law that would establish basic concepts, as well as clearly delineate the powers of federal, regional and local government authorities, – explained to Izvestia the importance of the bill, a State Duma deputy from United Russia, co-author of the bill Dmitry Vyatkin.

According to him, the most important thing is that now the budgets of all levels will have the opportunity to finance certain youth programs that are in effect or will be adopted.

Photo RIA Novosti / Vladimir Trefilov

The bill is also supported by the Public Chamber. True, among a number of comments in their response (at the disposal of Izvestia), social activists propose to introduce some clarifications into the document. For example, they are worried that there might be confusion in the law regarding the status of children who are now listed in the Family Code as under 18 years of age.In this regard, experts propose to register age groups in the law. Also in the OP consider it redundant to indicate the permanent place of residence of young people.

– If the adoption of the bill is caused by the need for measures to support young people, then this is great. If as a result of such measures do not appear, it will be a profanation, which will only cause disappointment of the society, – the head of the Political Expert Group Konstantin Kalachev told Izvestia.

At the same time, he believes that this is an important law, as it will allow structuring youth policy.Russia is becoming a social state, the expert emphasized: in addition to the law on youth, the recently adopted amendments to the Constitution also speak about it.

Age

Age

D.O. Trufanov

Institute of Natural Sciences and Humanities

FGOU VPO “Siberian Federal University”

(KrasSU)

VALUE ORIENTATIONS
DIFFERENT AGE CATEGORIES OF YOUTH IN THE PRACTICE OF MODERN MARTIAL ARTS

Period of life, within
which a person belongs to such a community as youth, is long-lasting and
stratified in a certain way.Allocation of different age categories
youth is associated with a difference in the qualities of a number of fundamental social
characteristics of young people of different ages. Among these characteristics you can
name the features of youth socialization, leading needs and ways
activities, the role and place of young people in the system of reproduction of society,
age psychological characteristics, etc. This state of affairs allows
assume that the value orientations of young people who practice modern
martial arts will be different for different age groups.

In order to identify
features of the emotional orientation of the personality of various age groups
categories of youth practicing modern martial arts, we were
the classification of this social community is used. Based on
the actual social status of the youth was divided into three categories:

·
student youth
(from 14 to 17 years old). This category includes young people, the main
whose activity is teaching at a secondary school;

·
student
youth (from 18 to 22 years old).This category was made up of young people, the main
whose activities are training in higher and secondary specialized educational institutions;

·
working youth
(from 23 to 30 years old). The working group includes young people, whose main activity is
which is work in production and in other areas related to
the need to ensure their own life.

This division corresponds
the division of the age period generally accepted in Russian sociology,
characterized by the concept of “youth”, into three categories: adolescents (from 14-15 to
18 years old), youth (18 – 23-24 years old), young adults (24-25 – 29-30 years old) [72].Research data suggests that targeting
emotional values ​​are not the same in different age groups
categories of youth.

So, needs,
constituting the basis of the complex of emotional values ​​ creation , have
different severity among young people involved in martial arts. Emotional
values ​​based on the need to help others, in the sense
life and the need for knowledge, the more pronounced, the older the respondent.Altruistic need, manifested in a feeling of joy when others
people manage to do something better than they, least of all expressed in
representatives of student youth, however, among young people aged 23 to 30
years, the value of the index of this need tends to one. Wherein
this need is most pronounced in no more than 4%
of respondents. The need for the meaning of life and for knowledge has the maximum
severity among representatives of working youth.

Values ​​based on
aesthetic needs, the need to help others, in communication, in
love and in activity, have the maximum expression among student youth.
At the same time, the index of the significance of these needs is high for all categories.
youth.

Maximum expressed in
representatives of student youth, the need for activity, manifested in
a kind of emotional experience when a person experiences a joyful
excitement, uplifting, if work is going well, when he sees what he is doing
successful results.More than 70% of respondents from among student youth in
maximally focused on a given emotional value.

A different situation was identified
regarding the emotional values ​​of the complex dominion .
Emotional values ​​of the complex ruling , as well as values
complex creation , have different severity in representatives
selected age categories of young people. Thus, value orientation is based on
which are the need for power and control over others, with high
negative values ​​of the significance indices are most pronounced in
representatives of working youth.Need for superiority over others
associated with the possibility of exercising power over other people, with
a positive value of the indices of significance among representatives of students and
student youth has a negative severity in young people,
constituting a subsample of working youth. If among the representatives of the student
and student youth to the maximum extent, this need is relevant for
19 – 20% of the respondents, then among the representatives of working youth only 5%
of respondents.Thus, there is a tendency towards a decrease in the significance of these
needs and corresponding values ​​among respondents from the age of the student
to the age of working youth.

High demand for
freedom, independence, relevant for all considered categories
youth, has the maximum positive expression among working youth.
The maximum value of the significance index indicates that it is for this
the category of youth is more valuable for a pleasant feeling of freedom when
nobody and nothing limits them and you can do whatever you want.However, if among
representatives of student youth are maximally focused on this
the experience of 46% of respondents, and among representatives of student youth – 45
%, then among the working youth – 43% of the respondents. Thus, representatives
working youth have a higher focus on experiencing
needs for freedom, independence in relation to other age groups
categories of young people with a decrease in the intensity of the experience of the corresponding
values.

A number of emotional values
complex ruling , on the contrary, have an inverse relationship with age
practitioners of martial arts. So, the needs for prestige, fame, domination
have the maximum severity among representatives of student youth. Among
of respondents constituting a subsample of working youth, in the maximum
two times fewer respondents are oriented towards this experience than
among representatives of student youth.Thus, emotional values, in
which are based on these needs, are most relevant for
representatives of student youth.

Finally, the need for
superiority over others, associated with the ability to decide the fate of a person
or any business, as well as a selfish need are most relevant
for representatives of student youth.

At high level
relevance of emotional values ​​that make up the complex consumption ,
with an increase in the age of combatants, they tend to decrease in importance.The needs for comfort and the acquisition of things are most important for
representatives of student youth.

Various needs
complex conformism are not equally significant for different age groups
categories of youth. The need for negative emotions, as well as the need for
patron with a negative value of the indices for all presented
ages, have a slightly greater negative severity in representatives
student youth.Conformist need manifested in feeling
satisfaction when you are in the shadows, not standing out from the people around you,
tends to decrease negative significance index with age
students for the age of working youth.

The need for stability,
associated with a sense of satisfaction when everything goes on as usual and not
the need to learn something new is most relevant for representatives
student youth. The scale index corresponding to a given value has
a positive, albeit very low, value.To the maximum extent given
the value is relevant for 10% of respondents among students and for 2 and 1%
student and working youth, respectively. For representatives
student and working youth, the index of this experience has
negative significance. At the same time, it is more negatively expressed
the specified need for representatives of student youth. Need in
stability, manifested in a pleasant feeling when nothing bothers, when
do not feel addiction to anything or someone, with an overall positive
directionality of values ​​is most pronounced in representatives
student youth.

Dynamics differs
values ​​that make up the complex of values ​​ game . Need for romance
becomes more relevant with an increase in the age of the respondents and in the maximum
degree manifests itself in representatives of working youth. Value, at the core
which the need for danger, risk, on the contrary, is most pronounced in
representatives of student youth and tends to decrease in importance with
increasing the age of the respondents.

Unequal significance for
representatives of different age groups of young people also have emotional
values ​​based on the need for security and waste. So,
the need for security, manifested in a sense of confidence, calmness in
situations familiar, understandable, when the surrounding situation is known in advance, when
rather high values ​​of the indices for all ages, slightly more
significant for working youth.Another aspect of this
needs associated with the presence of an immediate threat to the respondent, in
the maximum degree is expressed among representatives of student youth and has
a tendency to decrease in importance with increasing age of the respondents.

Reported data
allow for a comparative analysis of the structure of the needs of practitioners
modern martial arts of various age categories. The following is presented
comparative table of the structure of needs of the student, student and working
youth practicing martial arts according to the degree of their importance (tab.7).

Table 7. The structure of the value-needs sphere of the student,
student and working youth practicing modern martial arts

As the table shows.7, y
representatives of all age categories of youth practicing modern
martial arts, leading in the structure of penetrating value orientations are
emotional values ​​of the complex creation . However, the significance of the series
values ​​differ for different age groups of young people. So, at
representatives of student youth, the first rank place belongs to the need for
activities. This need among representatives of student youth takes
third ranked place, with the need for communication leading.Have
representatives of working youth, the needs for communication and activity have
similar index values ​​and occupy the first rank place. Second ranked
place among representatives of all categories of young people is the need for assistance
to others, associated with a feeling of joy and satisfaction when it is possible to do
anything good for dear people. At the same time, the maximum severity of this
has value among representatives of student youth.

Need for the meaning of life
ranks third in the structure of values ​​of representatives of the working
youth.Representatives of other categories of youth have a value corresponding to
needs in the sense of life, ranked fifth. Also feature
the value scale of representatives of working youth is high
relevance of the need for knowledge – it ranks fifth. Wherein
this need is ranked eighth among students’ representatives, and
student representatives – eleventh rank places. Aesthetic need
among the representatives of student youth it is in the sixth rank place.Several
this need is less urgent for young people
working (seventh rank). For representatives of student youth, this
need takes only the thirteenth rank place.

Needs for
dominance, in comfort, as well as in prestige, glory to a greater extent
determine the severity of the corresponding values ​​among the representatives of the student
youth. It is noteworthy that the need for dominance occupying
the sixth ranked place among representatives of student youth, only on the eleventh
and thirteenth places among representatives of student and working youth
accordingly, giving way to such needs as the need for comfort and
security.In turn, the need for security associated with the presence
immediate threat to the respondent, to a greater extent determines the behavior
representatives of working youth, ranking eighth. Have
representatives of pupils and students, this need is on the ninth
and tenth ranked places, respectively. At the same time, attention is drawn to itself,
that the value of the index for a given need is higher for representatives
student youth.

Among representatives
working youth practicing modern martial arts, a larger number
romantics than among other age groups of youth. This is what
distribution of relevant needs and their place in value scales
youth. For example, working youth have a need for romance.
takes the tenth ranked place, and the representatives of student and student
youth – fourteenth and sixteenth ranked places, respectively.Wherein
it is characteristic that young people under the age of 22 have a need for romance
gives way to another need of the complex of experiences game –
needs for danger, risk. Pupil and student representatives
for young people, this need is ranked twelfth. On the contrary, in
young people who make up a sub-sample of young people working, the need for
danger is in the fifteenth rank place, giving way to romantic
needs.

The need for
waste, generosity to a greater extent determines the significance
of the corresponding value among representatives of working youth – this
need is ranked twelfth. To a lesser extent, this
the need is relevant for representatives of student youth (seventeenth
ranked place) and students (nineteenth ranked place). Also
attention is drawn to the unequal place in the value scales of various
age categories of youth need for help to other people, manifested in
feeling of joy when people around you manage to do something better than you.So, if representatives of working youth have this need
nineteenth ranked place, then the representatives of student and student
youth – twenty-second and twenty-third rank places, respectively.

Among the needs with
negative values ​​of indices and practically do not determine behavior
the vast majority of respondents, a number of needs should be named
complex conformism ; and complex dominion .So,
the last rank places in the value scales of representatives of all ages
categories of youth practicing modern martial arts, is occupied by the need
in negative emotions, and twenty-sixth and twenty-seventh rank places –
the need for power and control over others. Conformist need
and also the need for power has the maximum negative value in
representatives of student youth.

Noteworthy,
that the value of the values ​​of the indices of needs and the corresponding emotional
values ​​in the subsample of student youth, on average, exceeds
indices in subsamples of students and working youth for ranks from first to
twelfth.The exception is the need for activity, which has
on the value scale of students, the maximum value of the index. This allows
to say that the dominant in the structure of the penetrating value orientations
needs of the complex creation , as well as a number of needs of others
complexes in general are more pronounced in a subsample of student
youth.

Thus, before us
three value scales of representatives of different age categories of young people,
having similar and distinctive features.Among the similarities in value orientations
young people practicing modern martial arts should be noted
stable dominant orientations towards the emotional values ​​of the complex
creation . Another similarity is the low value for all
categories of young people emotional values ​​of the complex conformism –
the needs that form its basis are extremely low or negative
the values ​​of the indices, as well as some of the needs of the complex dominion
– in negative emotions, in power and in control over others.Distinctive
features of the considered value scales – unequal severity of a number
needs, as well as various ranking places occupied by these needs
in the structure of needs.

Differences in value scales
young people in the practice of martial arts belonging to different age groups
categories are also manifested in their views on the future. The values ​​of creativity,
physical and spiritual and moral improvement are most important for
representatives of a subsample of working youth.So, from 76 to 85% of respondents in
this subsample is considered mandatory for themselves in the future active exercises
sports, spiritual development and moral self-improvement. Interesting
creative work in a subsample of student youth as compulsory for
28% of respondents consider themselves in the future, and among working youth –
more than half of the respondents. Also a tendency to increase in importance with age
of the respondent exhibit altruistic values ​​and belief in God.

Along with this, the dynamics
a number of values ​​demonstrates the opposite trend. Respondents’ orientation towards
values ​​such as a leading position, material wealth, prestige,
admiration of others, as well as good opportunities for recreation and entertainment,
being maximally expressed among representatives of student youth,
lose their relevance in a subsample of student and working youth. Draws on
attention to the dynamics of youth orientations towards the value of the family.If
of representatives of a subsample of student youth 71% of respondents define a good
family as a prerequisite for their future life, then among representatives
of working youth, a lower percentage is focused on this value
of respondents (63%).

Based on
the presented data, we highlight the social personality types of young people,
practicing modern martial arts.

Student youth ,
practicing modern martial arts, – a social community representing
by itself a kind of “activity type” personality.Representatives
of this community are focused on action, achieving success, striving for
pleasant experiences that arise when work is going well, when visible
successful results. Communication as a value for them is in third position.
Representatives of the community in question are focused on self-realization,
the desire to dominate among peers, in the company. They strive
feel satisfaction, pride, when they can prove their superiority over
rival, to do their job better than others.Learning youth is focused on
the value of the family and material wealth. A distinctive feature of representatives
this social community is the high urgency of the need for comfort,
striving for fun, carelessness, good physical well-being,
enjoying delicious food, relaxation, serene life. Majority
the considered practitioners of martial arts, to one degree or another, strive for fame,
prestige, strive to experience joy and pride when they are in the center
attention when they are sincerely admired.

Student youth ,
practicing modern martial arts, has characteristic features that allow
to define its representatives as belonging to “sociable type”
personality. Representatives of this community are more focused on
value of communication, experience joy, good mood when communicating with
good people when they see mutual understanding, friendship, and strive for these
experiences.The youth constituting this type are distinguished by a greater
emotionality, as indicated by the maximum values ​​of the indices
dominant emotional values. Representatives of this social
communities are focused on aesthetic experiences, strive to experience
a kind of beautiful feeling arising from the perception of nature, music,
poetry and other works of art.

Working youth ,
practicing modern martial arts, in its distinctive features can be
assigned to “romantic type” .Leading values ​​for
representatives of this social group are the values ​​of communication and
activities. They have a pronounced orientation towards the values ​​of the meaning of life,
focused on experiencing a sense of satisfaction when they see in front of them
a great goal and understand that they do not live in vain. Youth workers strive to
physical and spiritual and moral improvement, to creative work.
This type is also distinguished by the high relevance of the need for knowledge.Representatives of the considered social group are value-oriented
knowledge, have a keen interest, pleasure in learning new, with
acquaintance with amazing scientific facts, etc. Most representatives
working youth are focused on the values ​​of freedom, independence,
tend to experience a pleasant sensation when they are completely free, when no one and
nothing limits them and you can do what you want. They are also focused on
the value of your own safety, which is manifested in the desire for a pleasant
a sense of security, confidence, when it is known that no one and nothing to them
threatens.Representatives of this social community can be safely attributed to
romantics. They are more than representatives of other age categories.
youth, focused on experiencing romantic feelings, feelings
extraordinary, mysterious, unknown, appearing in an unfamiliar
terrain, setting. Most of the representatives of working youth in one or another
to some extent tend to experience a sense of satisfaction, joy from their own
generosity, when you can spend something without thinking about the consequences.

Thus, the given
data allow you to get an idea of ​​the “social color” of various
age categories of youth in the practice of modern martial arts.

90,000 The State Duma decided to raise the age of youth to 35 years

MOSCOW, 23 Dec – PRIME. The State Duma at a plenary session on Wednesday adopted a law on youth policy, which fixes the age of youth – “up to 35 years old inclusive”, instead of the current “up to 30 years.”

Sberbank named the age of achieving financial independence of Russians

The bill proposes to define at the federal level such concepts as “youth”, “young family”, “youth policy”, “youth public associations” and others, thereby securing the status of citizens belonging to the “youth”.The project also clearly defines the age group that belongs to the category of “youth” – these are people aged 14 to 35 years, inclusive.

For the second reading, the State Duma Committee on Physical Culture, Sports, Tourism and Youth Affairs supported 42 amendments, which were initiated during a broad discussion of the bill in the Federation Council and the State Duma, legislative assemblies of the constituent entities of the Federation, as well as at meetings with representatives of public youth associations.

Changes affected the basic concepts formulated by the bill, goals and principles of youth policy.The bill introduces a clarification that young people include persons under 35 years old inclusive, which will avoid discrepancies in the application of the law in practice. In addition, a new concept of “youth work specialist” has been introduced. The proposed changes specify who exactly belongs to the category of “young family”, “young specialist”.

Also, the project significantly expanded the goals and main directions of youth policy. The developers attributed to them the civil-patriotic and moral education of the younger generation, the promotion of youth participation in volunteer activities, the implementation of youth initiatives, the creation of conditions for physical education, sports, the promotion of a healthy lifestyle for young people, the development of the institution of mentoring, support for persons from among orphans and children left without parental care.

For the second reading, an article devoted to monitoring the implementation of youth policy was also finalized. The preparation of an annual report on the situation of youth in the Russian Federation is envisaged. At the same time, the amendments provide for a remote format of participation in the implementation of youth policy.

As the chairman of the State Duma committee on physical culture, sports, tourism and youth affairs Boris Paikin told reporters, after the adoption of the law on youth policy, “it will secure the rights of young people regardless of the region of residence, which is quite important, given the current trends in remote work and the increasing mobility of the population. “.”In addition, it will provide a basis for the unification of forms and types of support in all regions of the country. Thanks to this, inequality in measures of social support for young people and young families in the regions will be eliminated, as well as discrepancies in the age qualification. young people include persons under 35 years old inclusive. And this age bar is the same for all subjects of the Russian Federation. If possible, the regions can increase it, but in no way reduce it! ” – Paikin emphasized.

The deputy said how to lower the retirement age

The head of the committee called this bill “landmark”, since for the first time young people, as the target audience of the bill, took part in its creation, and, one might say, “became its co-author.”

Vice-Speaker of the Federation Council Galina Karelova noted that in connection with the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, legislation on youth policy has received significant development.

“The main directions of youth policy will include support for young families, assistance in solving housing problems and the provision of social services. Special attention is paid to supporting socially significant initiatives and youth entrepreneurship, assistance in employment and education of young people,” said the senator to RIA Novosti.

According to her, the implementation of the law will contribute to the creation of new opportunities, conditions and prospects for the participation of young people in all spheres of society.

Department of Culture, Youth and Sports / Idea

Main page »Official events» Contests, Projects, Festivals »Ready for Labor and Defense» Idea

The All-Russian Movement “Ready for Labor and Defense” is a physical education program that existed in our country from 1931 to 1991, which covered the population aged 10 to 60 years.With the liquidation of the Soviet Union, the TRP complex ceased to exist. Since 2014, the complex has been reviving in the conditions of modern Russia.
The modern complex “Ready for Labor and Defense” (TRP) is a full-fledged program and normative basis for physical education of the country’s population, aimed at the development of mass sports and the improvement of the nation.

Preparation for the fulfillment of the state requirements of the RLD complex is provided by systematic classes in physical education programs in educational institutions, points of initial military training, sports sections, general physical training groups, in institutions of additional education (sports clubs) and independently.

The TRP complex consists of of 11 steps in accordance with age groups of the population from 6 to 70 years and older and standards for 3 levels of difficulty, corresponding to gold, silver and bronze signs .

I. STEP – age group from 6 to 8 years old
II. STEP – age group from 9 to 10 years
III. STEP – age group from 11 to 12 years
IV. LEVEL – age group from 13 to 15 years old
V. LEVEL – age group from 16 to 17 years old
VI.STEP – age group from 18 to 29 years old
VII. STEP – age group from 30 to 39 years old
VIII. STEP – age group from 40 to 49 years
IX. LEVEL – age group from 50 to 59 years old
X. LEVEL – age group from 60 to 69 years old
XI. LEVEL – age group from 70 years old and older

TRP standards

For pupils:

1 STEP – TRP STANDARDS FOR SCHOOLBOYS 6-8 YEARS

2 STEP – TRP STANDARDS FOR 9-10 YEARS OLD STUDENTS

3 STEP – TRP STANDARDS FOR SCHOOLBOYS 11-12 YEARS

4 STEP – TRP STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS 13-15 YEARS

5 STEP – TRP STANDARDS FOR SCHOOLBOYS 16-17 YEARS

For men:

6 STEP – TRP STANDARDS FOR MEN 18-29 YEARS

7 STEP – TRP STANDARDS FOR MEN 30-39 YEARS

STEP 8 – TRP STANDARDS FOR MEN 40-49 YEARS

STEP 9 – TRP STANDARDS FOR MEN 50-59 YEARS

10 STEP – TRP STANDARDS FOR MEN 60-69 YEARS

11 STEP – TRP STANDARDS FOR MEN 70 YEARS OLD AND OVER

For women

6 STEP – TRP STANDARDS FOR WOMEN 18-29 YEARS

7 STEP – TRP STANDARDS FOR WOMEN 30-39 YEARS

STEP 8 – TRP STANDARDS FOR WOMEN 40-49 YEARS

STEP 9 – TRP STANDARDS FOR WOMEN 50-59 YEARS

10 STEP – TRP STANDARDS FOR WOMEN 60-69 YEARS

11 STEP – TRP STANDARDS FOR WOMEN 70 YEARS OLD AND OVER

Detailed information can be found on the official TRP website: www.gto.ru

90,000: Technology and media :: RBK

The share of Internet users aged 12 to 24 is the largest in comparison with other age categories – 97.1%.On average, 78% of Russians were online at least once a month

Photo: Sergey Bobylev / TASS

The share of Internet users aged 12 to 24 in Russia approached 100% and amounted to 97.1% in February-November 2020, follows from Mediascope data (RBC has it).

This age group has the largest number of Internet users. In other categories, the number of those who spend time online decreases with increasing age: in the category from 25 to 34 years old, 95.8% of Russians used the Internet at least once a month, in the category from 35 to 44 years old – 93.7%, from 45 to 54 years old – 84.2% and in the category over 55 years old – almost half (49.7%).

In total, from February to November 2020, on average, 78.1% of the country’s residents over 12 years of age went online at least once a month.

Most often, Russians access the Internet from mobile phones, the researchers found. So, at least once a month, 70.8% of citizens used a smartphone for this purpose, a computer – 50.8%.

At the same time, 27.1% of Russians used exclusively a mobile phone to access the Internet in 2020. Most of the exclusive mobile users in Russia are in the 25-34 age category (36.1%).

Ivan Ognev on youth policy

P Chairman of the Public Council under at Board of Youth Policy and Implementation of Social Development Programs of the Altai Territory, Head of the Department of Extracurricular Activities of Altai State Technical University Ivan Ognev shared his thoughts on the adoption of the federal law “On youth In Russian federation”.

On November 11, 2020, the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation adopted in the first reading the federal law “On youth policy in the Russian Federation.” Currently, there is an active discussion of the first version of the law, proposals for amendments have been collected.

How was the legislative regulation of the youth sphere carried out earlier?

First, it is important to understand what the term youth includes. In short, youth is a special age group in society that has a great influence on the development of other age groups, as well as on all spheres of society (economic, social, etc.)).

To date, the legislation on youth is not singled out as a separate branch of law, but it includes the norms of constitutional, civil, labor, criminal, criminal procedure and other branches of law. The rights of young people are reflected in the regulations governing education, culture, health care, defining military duty.

In order to understand what experience has been accumulated in our country, you can look into the Soviet era. After the revolutions of the early twentieth century, youth took shape as a certain driving force.The state decided to systematize work with youth and add ideology, actually politicizing the youth movements of the USSR. On the one hand, this gave a positive effect, for example, by giving goal-setting, strengthened love for the Motherland, but, on the other hand, limited the activity of young people, narrowing the scope of possible development.

Development went on and at some point came to the conclusion that it was necessary to adopt a separate law. In 1967, a special Commission was created to prepare the “USSR Law on Youth”.Entire generations of youth leaders changed before, on April 16, 1991, the Supreme Soviet of the USSR adopted the Law “On the General Principles of State Youth Policy in the USSR”, which for obvious reasons lost its force in December of the same year. In fact, the legal achievement of Soviet youth did not last even a year, despite the fact that it took decades to achieve it step by step.

Since 1991, a new reality has been forming in the new Russia, laws of a number of subjects of the country have appeared, but there was no draft federal law until 1999.

But here, too, there is a problem. On the Federal Law “On the Foundations of State Youth Policy in the Russian Federation” adopted in 1999, President B.N. Yeltsin imposed a veto, which the deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation could not overcome.

Thus, analyzing the historical prerequisites for the adoption of the law, one can come to the conclusion that, despite the fact that such a law is very necessary – at different times and even different eras – the legislator has never been able to win, so to speak.

It would seem that even a short historical essay should make it clear to us that the matter of adopting a federal law is deliberately losing and everyone should lose heart. But, fortunately, this did not happen. The Federal Agency for Youth Affairs under the leadership of A.V.Bugaev, the leadership of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, relying on youth movements, are consistently moving as a united front towards the adoption of the new Law.

P Why, in your opinion, is the law needed today and what is its relevance?

The bill, in my opinion, is not comprehensive, but it defines the vector, the direction of development.The law creates a unified legal field in the field of youth policy, which makes it possible to lay the foundations for further legal regulation of the sphere at the federal, regional and municipal levels of government. The goal is to actively involve young people in solving issues that are significant for them. If, with the help of this law, we manage to create the ground for young people to have the opportunity to influence the decision of significant issues concerning young people, this will be a real victory.

To illustrate the relevance, I will give a few examples.

The bill envisages raising the age of youth to 35 years. This means that the number of young people in the Russian Federation will increase by 12.7 million people and will reach 41 million. Why is this necessary? In practical terms, this will mean that significantly more Russian citizens will be able to take advantage of support measures provided, for example, by Rosmolodezh within the framework of the All-Russian competition of youth projects.

Does the initiative come from the youth themselves? Is there a request for an increase in age? Yes.I work within the framework of the All-Russian public organization “Union of Machine Builders of Russia” and I note that we have repeatedly discussed at various forums the issue of raising the age of young people. At the enterprises of the machine-building industry, behind the scenes, the age of a young specialist has been increased. In many enterprises, it is even over 35 years old. And it works.

Another example. The law will affect the very real spheres of life of young people, for example, it includes such areas as support for talented youth, provision of guarantees in the field of labor and employment of young people, assistance in youth employment, support for the development of youth entrepreneurship.The economy of our country needs youth today, and by providing guarantees in the world of work, supporting the entrepreneurial spirit of young children, we will, in a sense, lay the foundation for economic development and growth in our country.

One more thing. The bill will help youth organizations and associations to more easily and effectively interact with government agencies on youth policy issues. This is a positive aspect, after all, a fresh look at the problems, somewhere even healthy criticism will allow the authorities to choose the right vector for the development of youth policy, not to waste precious time, which is an important resource in the modern world!

In conclusion, I would like to note the fact that the law is adopted flexibly and anyone interested could send their proposals in terms of improving the draft law.In particular, we also managed to do this. This allows us to say that the law is adopted without unnecessary haste, taking into account the opinions and suggestions of young people themselves, specialists working in the field of youth policy – and this, you see, is already a guarantee of success!

.