What is the premise of Spiderhead. How does Joseph Kosinski’s direction compare to Top Gun: Maverick. Why does the movie struggle to live up to its source material. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the film’s performances.
The Concept and Setting of Spiderhead
Spiderhead, directed by Joseph Kosinski, is a sci-fi thriller based on George Saunders’ short story “Escape from Spiderhead.” The film is set in a unique penitentiary and research facility where inmates serve as test subjects for experimental psychotropic drugs. These medications, administered through devices implanted at the base of the spine, can induce a wide range of effects, from heightened libido to altered perception of reality.
The facility, located on a remote island, is a striking piece of Brutalist architecture. Its asymmetrical design and gravity-defying structure create an unsettling atmosphere that perfectly complements the film’s themes of control and manipulation.
The Spiderhead Facility: A Psychological Playground
How does the Spiderhead facility differ from traditional prisons. Unlike conventional correctional institutions, Spiderhead blurs the lines between incarceration and scientific experimentation. The inmates have a degree of freedom within the facility, but at the cost of becoming human guinea pigs for potentially dangerous drug trials.
- Unique architectural design that reflects the film’s themes
- Remote island location adding to the sense of isolation
- Observation rooms designed to resemble talk show sets
- Advanced technology for drug administration and monitoring
Chris Hemsworth’s Performance as Steve Abnesti
Chris Hemsworth takes on the role of Steve Abnesti, the charismatic and morally ambiguous head of research at Spiderhead. Hemsworth’s performance is one of the film’s highlights, as he skillfully portrays a character who walks the line between scientific curiosity and ethical transgression.
Abnesti’s character is a departure from Hemsworth’s usual heroic roles, allowing the actor to showcase his range and versatility. His portrayal of the smooth-talking, seemingly well-intentioned scientist adds layers of complexity to the film’s exploration of free will and moral responsibility.
The Charming Face of Unethical Science
How does Chris Hemsworth bring Steve Abnesti to life. Hemsworth infuses the character with a mix of charm, intelligence, and underlying menace. His performance captures the essence of a man who believes he’s working for the greater good, even as his methods become increasingly questionable.
- Charismatic presence that commands attention
- Subtle hints of manipulation in interactions with inmates
- Moments of genuine enthusiasm for scientific discovery
- Gradual reveal of darker motivations as the story progresses
The Central Conflict: Ethics vs. Scientific Progress
At the heart of Spiderhead lies a fundamental ethical dilemma: how far should science go in the pursuit of knowledge and potential societal benefits. The film explores this question through the lens of its characters, particularly the conflict between Steve Abnesti’s ambitious research goals and the well-being of the inmates under his care.
This ethical quandary is further complicated by the voluntary nature of the inmates’ participation in the experiments. While they have agreed to be test subjects in exchange for a more comfortable prison experience, the true extent of the risks involved is not always clear.
The Price of Progress
What are the moral implications of using prisoners as test subjects. The film raises important questions about informed consent, power dynamics in correctional settings, and the potential for exploitation in the name of scientific advancement.
- The blurred lines between punishment and rehabilitation
- The ethics of offering incentives for participation in potentially dangerous experiments
- The responsibility of researchers to protect vulnerable populations
- The potential societal benefits weighed against individual harm
Miles Teller and Jurnee Smollett: The Heart of the Story
While Chris Hemsworth’s performance is a standout, the emotional core of Spiderhead rests on the shoulders of Miles Teller as Jeff and Jurnee Smollett as Lizzy. These two inmates become entangled in the web of Abnesti’s experiments, forcing them to confront their past traumas and question their place in the Spiderhead system.
Teller brings a brooding intensity to Jeff, a character haunted by the car accident that led to his imprisonment. Smollett’s Lizzy, an addition to the original short story, provides a much-needed emotional counterpoint and raises the stakes for Jeff’s journey.
Chemistry and Conflict
How do Teller and Smollett’s performances contribute to the film’s themes. Their portrayals highlight the human cost of scientific experimentation and the struggle to maintain one’s identity and agency in a controlled environment.
- Nuanced performances that convey complex emotions
- Development of a believable relationship within the constraints of the setting
- Exploration of guilt, redemption, and the desire for connection
- Representation of the moral dilemmas faced by the test subjects
Joseph Kosinski’s Direction: A Departure from Top Gun: Maverick
Spiderhead marks a significant departure for director Joseph Kosinski, coming hot on the heels of his blockbuster success with Top Gun: Maverick. While the latter film was a high-octane, nostalgia-fueled spectacle, Spiderhead takes a more cerebral approach, focusing on psychological tension and moral ambiguity.
Kosinski’s direction in Spiderhead demonstrates his versatility as a filmmaker, trading expansive aerial sequences for claustrophobic interiors and intense character interactions. The contrast between these two films showcases Kosinski’s ability to adapt his style to different genres and storytelling requirements.
Adapting to a New Cinematic Landscape
How does Kosinski’s direction in Spiderhead differ from his work on Top Gun: Maverick. The director employs a more restrained visual style, relying on atmospheric tension and performances rather than high-energy action sequences.
- Emphasis on psychological drama over physical spectacle
- Use of confined spaces to create a sense of unease
- Focus on character interactions and subtle power dynamics
- Integration of visual effects to represent the drug-induced experiences
The Challenges of Adapting George Saunders’ Short Story
Adapting George Saunders’ “Escape from Spiderhead” for the screen presented numerous challenges for the filmmakers. The original short story is known for its dark humor, complex themes, and unconventional narrative structure – elements that don’t always translate easily to film.
The screenplay by Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick attempts to expand on the source material, adding new characters and plot points to flesh out the story for a feature-length movie. However, this expansion comes at the cost of some of the original’s more nuanced and ambiguous elements.
From Page to Screen
What are the main differences between the short story and the film adaptation. The movie takes a more conventional approach to storytelling, focusing on character relationships and plot twists rather than the philosophical musings that characterize Saunders’ work.
- Addition of new characters and subplots
- Shift in tone from darkly satirical to more straightforward thriller
- Expansion of the facility’s background and operations
- Altered ending that diverges from the source material
The Role of Music and Atmosphere in Spiderhead
One of the more unexpected elements of Spiderhead is its soundtrack, which features a collection of upbeat 1970s and 1980s hits. This musical choice creates an interesting contrast with the film’s dark themes and futuristic setting, adding a layer of surreal dissonance to the viewing experience.
The juxtaposition of cheerful, nostalgia-inducing songs with the unsettling events unfolding on screen serves to heighten the sense of unease and moral ambiguity that permeates the film. It’s a bold creative decision that sets Spiderhead apart from more conventional sci-fi thrillers.
Sonic Dissonance
How does the soundtrack contribute to the overall atmosphere of Spiderhead. The upbeat music creates a jarring contrast with the film’s dark subject matter, reinforcing the idea that things in the facility are not as they appear on the surface.
- Use of familiar songs to create a false sense of comfort
- Musical cues that underscore key emotional moments
- Contrast between cheerful melodies and disturbing visuals
- Reflection of the disorienting effects of the experimental drugs
Visual Effects and the Representation of Drug-Induced States
Spiderhead relies on visual effects to depict the various altered states of consciousness induced by the experimental drugs. These sequences range from subtle perceptual shifts to more dramatic hallucinations, providing a visual representation of the inmates’ experiences.
The film’s approach to visualizing these drug-induced states is both creative and restrained, avoiding over-the-top psychedelic imagery in favor of more grounded, relatable effects. This choice helps maintain the film’s balance between sci-fi concepts and psychological realism.
Visualizing the Invisible
How effective are the visual effects in conveying the impact of the experimental drugs. The film uses a combination of subtle visual cues and more overt effects to represent the range of drug-induced experiences, from heightened emotions to altered perceptions of reality.
- Color grading shifts to represent mood alterations
- Distortions of physical space to convey disorientation
- Subtle changes in actor performances to indicate drug effects
- Integration of CGI elements to represent more extreme hallucinations
The Film’s Exploration of Free Will and Determinism
At its core, Spiderhead grapples with the philosophical concepts of free will and determinism. The experimental drugs administered to the inmates raise questions about the nature of choice and the extent to which our actions are truly our own.
The film presents scenarios where characters make decisions under the influence of mood-altering substances, blurring the lines between genuine choice and chemically induced behavior. This exploration of agency and responsibility adds depth to the narrative and invites viewers to consider the implications of advances in neuroscience and pharmacology.
The Illusion of Choice
How does Spiderhead challenge our understanding of free will. Through its portrayal of drug-induced behavior modifications, the film asks whether true free will can exist in a world where our thoughts and emotions can be chemically manipulated.
- Scenarios that test the limits of personal responsibility
- Exploration of the role of emotions in decision-making
- Questions about the nature of identity and self-determination
- Examination of the ethical implications of mood-altering drugs
The Film’s Reception and Critical Response
Spiderhead has received mixed reviews from critics and audiences alike. While many praise the film’s ambitious themes and strong performances, particularly from Chris Hemsworth, others have criticized its pacing and departure from the source material.
Some reviewers have noted that the film struggles to maintain the delicate balance between its philosophical underpinnings and the demands of a mainstream thriller. The result is a movie that, while intriguing, doesn’t fully capitalize on the potential of its premise.
A Divisive Adaptation
What aspects of Spiderhead have been most praised and criticized. Critics have generally appreciated the film’s visual style and performances but have been more divided on its storytelling and thematic exploration.
- Praise for Chris Hemsworth’s against-type performance
- Criticism of the film’s pacing and narrative structure
- Mixed reactions to the adaptation’s departures from the source material
- Appreciation for the film’s ambitious themes and visual design
The Legacy of Spiderhead in the Context of Sci-Fi Cinema
While Spiderhead may not have achieved the same level of critical acclaim as some other recent sci-fi films, it does contribute to the ongoing tradition of using the genre to explore complex ethical and philosophical questions. The movie joins a lineage of films that use speculative scenarios to examine the human condition and the potential consequences of scientific advancement.
In its exploration of drug-induced behavior modification and the ethics of human experimentation, Spiderhead touches on themes that resonate with contemporary debates about neuroscience, pharmacology, and the nature of consciousness. These elements may ensure that the film finds a place in discussions of 21st-century sci-fi cinema.
A Thought-Provoking Addition to the Genre
How does Spiderhead contribute to the evolution of sci-fi cinema. Despite its flaws, the film raises important questions about free will, scientific ethics, and the potential dangers of unchecked technological progress.
- Continuation of the tradition of using sci-fi to explore philosophical concepts
- Incorporation of contemporary scientific and ethical debates
- Unique visual representation of drug-induced mental states
- Potential influence on future films dealing with similar themes
In conclusion, Spiderhead represents an ambitious attempt to translate George Saunders’ thought-provoking short story into a feature-length film. While the adaptation may not fully capture the nuance and complexity of its source material, it succeeds in presenting audiences with a visually striking and thematically rich sci-fi thriller. The strong performances, particularly from Chris Hemsworth, and the film’s exploration of weighty philosophical concepts ensure that Spiderhead will likely spark discussions long after the credits roll.
As the boundaries between science fiction and reality continue to blur, films like Spiderhead serve as important cultural touchstones, encouraging us to consider the ethical implications of scientific progress and the nature of human consciousness. While it may not be a perfect film, Spiderhead’s willingness to grapple with complex ideas and push the boundaries of the sci-fi genre makes it a noteworthy addition to contemporary cinema.
‘Spiderhead’ Review: Prisoners of the Mind
Movies|‘Spiderhead’ Review: Prisoners of the Mind
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/16/movies/spiderhead-review.html
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
This latest Joseph Kosinski film — set in a penitentiary that dispenses aphrodisiacs and fear-inducers — couldn’t be more unlike his “Top Gun: Maverick.”
Chris Hemsworth, the mastermind in ”Spiderhead.”Credit…Netflix
- Spiderhead
- Directed by Joseph Kosinski
- Action, Crime, Drama, Sci-Fi, Thriller
- R
- 1h 46m
Find Tickets
When you purchase a ticket for an independently reviewed film through our site, we earn an affiliate commission.
With “Spiderhead,” the director Joseph Kosinski returns to screens in what feels like record time, given that his pandemic-delayed “Top Gun: Maverick” opened in theaters just three weeks ago. If that sequel aimed to short-circuit viewers’ higher functions by appealing to nostalgia and working the adrenal glands, the newer movie is a smaller-scale, principally interior production, shot under Covid restrictions, that aims to ponder the deep secrets of the human mind.
As if to brace audiences for serious viewing, the film even opens with a logo for The New Yorker, following one for Netflix; it’s based on a short story by George Saunders that the magazine published in 2010. In the movie version, Spiderhead is the name of a penitentiary and research center where prisoners serve as test subjects for psychotropic drugs. These meds, dispensed from packs installed at the base of the spine, serve all sorts of purposes. They can turbocharge libidos, make air pollution look like rainbow-ringed clouds or inspire terror at the sight of a stapler.
The head of research, Steve Abnesti, is played by Chris Hemsworth, who glides around the Bond-villain-lair sets in aviator glasses. He delivers smarmy lectures on improving the world and berates his assistant, Mark (Mark Paguio), for not freshening the coffee. Together, the scientists bogart most of what’s enjoyable in “Spiderhead,” with Hemsworth gleefully playing up his character’s nonchalance over his unsound experiments and ethical lapses.
“The time to worry about crossing lines was a lot of lines ago,” Steve tells Mark with a wave of the hands.
It’s not that Jeff (Miles Teller), the protagonist, who broods over the car wreck that put him in prison, and his love interest, Lizzy (Jurnee Smollett) — an addition from the short story — are entirely boring. But Kosinski’s specialty is tangible action sequences, with planes and explosions, not people who agonize over guilt and punishment. While you can admire Kosinski’s efforts to make a brainy blockbuster, the script (by Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick) is better suited to the cerebral tendencies of a David Cronenberg or a Steven Soderbergh, rather than a filmmaker apparently set on wresting a crowd-pleaser from dark material.
Kosinski does what he can to keep this production, shot in Australia, fast and loose. The room where Jeff and other inmates are observed after dosing wittily resembles a talk show set, with yellow easy chairs. The prison, located on a remote island, is an asymmetrical, almost gravity-defying slab of Brutalist weirdness.
The soundtrack is filled with 1970s and ’80s earworms, as if Spiderhead were Studio 54.
But Kosinski can’t make the inane philosophizing about free will sound profound or new, and the hectic, hasty finale, lacking the nerve or chilly interiority of the original story, plays like something that blew up in the lab.
Spiderhead
Rated R for an experimental (but quite effective) aphrodisiac drug. Running time: 1 hour 46 minutes. Watch on Netflix.
Spiderhead
Find Tickets
When you purchase a ticket for an independently reviewed film through our site, we earn an affiliate commission.
- Director
- Joseph Kosinski
- Writers
- Rhett Reese, Paul Wernick
- Stars
- Miles Teller, Chris Hemsworth, Charles Parnell, Jurnee Smollett, Tess Haubrich
- Rating
- R
- Running Time
- 1h 46m
- Genres
- Action, Crime, Drama, Sci-Fi, Thriller
Movie data powered by IMDb.
com
A version of this article appears in print on , Section C, Page 5 of the New York edition with the headline: Experimenting With Free Will and the Cerebral. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe
‘Spiderhead’ Review: A New Low for Netflix
There is only one way to escape from Spiderhead in sly postmodern scamp George Saunders’ all-but-unfilmable short story “Escape From Spiderhead,” and it rhymes with skip-to-my-lou-icide. Unlike print fiction, where pretty much anything goes, movies that feature acts of self-harm must be very careful, since audiences have been known to emulate those same acts. Right up front, Netflix warns viewers of its woefully wrongheaded adaptation that the movie features such behavior. But if Netflix really cared about our well-being, why release a film so bad, we’d do practically anything to escape from “Spiderhead” ourselves?
No one would blame you for sampling it in the first place. Saunders is a wickedly funny author with more major writing prizes than Meryl Streep has Oscars.
The tricky source material was translated by “Deadpool” duo Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick, who understand how to walk the line between outrageous and offensive, and then given to “Top Gun: Maverick” helmer Joseph Kosinski, who doesn’t. The Netflix logo may give you pause, but it also bears the imprimatur of The New Yorker Studios. Plus, it stars Chris Hemsworth, Miles Teller and a guy with tattoos covering half his body (Nathan Jones), big enough to eat the both of them.
Ta-dum! So you gave in and clicked Play, and right away something feels off. If you’re familiar with the short story, everything feels off. But for the vast majority of people — who don’t even bother to read the Netflix plot capsules, much less short stories that run in The New Yorker — “Spiderhead” the movie will be the first and only encounter they have with Saunders’ dark and practically deranged premise.
“Spiderhead” the movie takes place in a futuristic research facility, i.e., Spiderhead, where prisoners of serious crimes are offered an alternative to hard time: They can take part in a series of drug tests conducted by a sociopath named Steve Abnesti (Hemsworth).
The drugs in question have tongue-in-cheek designer-pharmaceutical-sounding names, like Luvactin and Darkenfloxx, garnished with cutesy ™ symbols. Said trials use chemicals to manipulate human emotions and behavior: love and fear, honesty and obedience. Verbaluce stimulates one’s language centers. Vivistif works like Viagra.
Before Abnesti can dose his subjects with these mood-changing substances, they must verbally say the word “acknowledge.” But the real manipulator here is Abnesti, who bullies and cajoles his subjects into totally inappropriate situations. Situations like these — i.e., using Luvactin to make two disinterested parties jump each other’s bones, repeating the same test with various parties, then forcing one subject to choose which of his mates receives a potentially lethal dose of Darkenfloxx — are very hard to make funny when performed by real people.
Even if there were, Hemsworth is not the right actor for this role. Sure, we’ve seen him be funny before (playing the airhead assistant in “Ghostbusters,” for example), but the comedy here is supposed to come from how unbelievably callous this man is — that and the wildly unprofessional parameters of his experiments, which cross pretty much every ethical line imaginable.
So it’s not enough for Hemsworth to pose and look cute, delivering in-on-the-joke lines like “Beautiful people get away with too much. I say that having benefited a few times myself.” Because there is no joke to be in on.
Reese and Wernick don’t get it. They think it’s featuring the song “She Blinded Me With Science” during experiments.
Kosinski doesn’t get it. He thinks it’s directing two Luvactin-pumped subjects to go at each other like a pair of oversexed Tex Avery cartoons, while the Swingle Sisters caterwaul alongside.
The actors don’t get it. They’ve been trained to find the reality in their roles, but Saunders’ sense of humor is pitched at such an unbelievable extreme, it would have been wiser to go full Peter Sellers with their performances.
Tonally, there’s no easy way to play Abnesti or his human guinea pigs, each of whom has been locked away for some truly heinous act — like infanticide, murder or licensing the rights for a George Saunders story to Netflix.
All except Jeff (Teller), whose crime was its own punishment. Jeff drank and drove his car into a tree, killing his best friend. Kosinski shows the accident in a flashback, so overwrought with visual effects, it looks like a scene Baz Luhrmann left out of “The Great Gatsby.”
There’s a reason Kosinski and company decided to make Jeff more sympathetic than he was in the short story. In the short story, Jeff smashed his friend’s head in with a rock. But the film team is focused on that escape-from-Spiderhead idea. And they don’t think suicide would make for a happy ending.
In the movie, Spiderhead is a chic concrete bunker on a remote tropical island reached only by biplane. The architect clearly watched a few James Bond movies. But what that has to do with Saunders’ story is anybody’s guess.
Surely someone must have read the source material and realized the movie would be going in a very different direction. What direction would that be? Imagine the Michael Bay version of “Flowers for Algernon.
” Or the Stanley Milgram study reinvented as an action movie, complete with badly staged fistfights and low-budget explosions.
Saunders’ story is amusing. Not his best, but certainly up to snuff with the other fiction that appears in The New Yorker. Amid the laughs, which are designed to make readers uncomfortable, Saunders aspires to better understand what drives certain human behavior. Could you make a drug that causes subjects to be happy or horny, submissive or depressed, with no lingering effects of that emotion? How is that different from what our bodies experience as love or pain?
But the instant you ask a group of actors to play the same scenario, it all falls apart. Kosinski is a gifted director, but his specialty is juggling human elements with complex visual effects. He is not cut out for this kind of comedy. His design choices are all wrong. The execution is tone deaf. And even Oscar-winning editor Stephen Mirrione can’t salvage it (he couldn’t rescue Charlie Kaufman/George Clooney’s “Confessions of a Dangerous Mind” either).
