How does the HEAD Flexpoint Radical tennis racquet perform on the court. What are the key features of the Flexpoint technology. Does the racquet deliver on its promises of improved control and feel.
Understanding HEAD’s Flexpoint Technology
HEAD has introduced an innovative approach to racquet design with their Flexpoint technology. The core of this innovation lies in a “precisely engineered hole” at the 3 and 9 o’clock positions on the racquet head, accompanied by a dimple that reduces the beam width by up to 25%. This design aims to increase flexibility in the upper hoop of the racquet, theoretically leading to improved performance.
The Science Behind Flexpoint
The primary goal of Flexpoint technology is to alter the way the racquet flexes upon impact with the ball. While traditional racquets flex from the tip down through the shaft, Flexpoint racquets are engineered to increase flex in the hoop. This design is intended to create a “cupping” effect on the ball, which HEAD claims results in:
- Longer dwell time (duration of ball contact with the strings)
- Greater control and feel for the player
- More accurate hitting due to reduced angles at which the ball leaves the strings
These claims are certainly intriguing, but do they hold up under real-world testing? Our comprehensive review aims to answer this question.
Flexpoint Radical Midplus: Performance on Groundstrokes
The Flexpoint Radical Midplus received positive feedback from our testing team when it came to groundstrokes. Players noted several key performance aspects:
Ease of Use and Comfort
Testers found the racquet easy to use, with smooth and effortless strokes from both forehand and backhand sides. The racquet facilitated consistent deep and controlled shots from the baseline, providing a comfortable feel for various stroke types.
Spin and Control
Despite initial concerns about spin generation due to the smaller head size and tight string pattern, testers found that they could produce decent topspin. The racquet also performed well for slice backhands, both as defensive shots and approach shots.
Sweet Spot Performance
Shots hitting the sweet spot were reported to have good depth and pace. However, off-center hits tended to land short, highlighting the importance of consistent ball striking with this racquet.
Comparing Flexpoint to Liquidmetal Technology
Several testers drew comparisons between the Flexpoint Radical Midplus and its predecessor, the Liquidmetal Radical Midplus. Key observations included:
- Subtle but noticeable difference in feel
- Improved response on off-center hits
- Better control and pace maintenance when hitting off-balance or close to the body
- Similar spin potential and power
- Enhanced touch for drop shots
One tester noted that the Flexpoint version felt slightly more head-heavy than the Liquidmetal model, providing good stability but potentially sacrificing some maneuverability for players who prefer a more head-light balance.
String Sensitivity and Customization Potential
An interesting observation from the playtest was the increased string sensitivity of the Flexpoint Radical Midplus. This characteristic suggests that players may be able to fine-tune the racquet’s performance even further by experimenting with different string types and tensions.
How can players optimize the Flexpoint Radical’s performance through stringing? Consider the following options:
- Experiment with various string materials (polyester, multifilament, natural gut)
- Adjust string tension to find the optimal balance between power and control
- Try hybrid stringing setups to combine the benefits of different string types
This customization potential adds another layer of versatility to the racquet, allowing players to tailor its performance to their specific playing style and preferences.
Flexpoint Technology: Impact on Volleys and Serves
While groundstroke performance is crucial, a well-rounded racquet must also excel at the net and on serves. How does the Flexpoint Radical Midplus fare in these areas?
Volley Performance
Testers reported positive experiences when volleying with the Flexpoint Radical Midplus. The racquet’s stability and control translated well to net play, allowing for precise touch volleys and solid punch volleys. The increased feel provided by the Flexpoint technology seemed to benefit players when executing delicate shots at the net.
Serving with Flexpoint
On serves, the racquet received mixed reviews. Some players found that they could generate good pace and spin, particularly on slice serves. However, others noted that the racquet felt slightly underpowered compared to more modern, stiffer frames. The control and precision offered by the Flexpoint Radical Midplus were consistently praised, allowing for accurate placement of serves.
Who Is the Flexpoint Radical Midplus Best Suited For?
Based on the playtest feedback and analysis of the racquet’s characteristics, the HEAD Flexpoint Radical Midplus appears to be well-suited for:
- Intermediate to advanced players who prioritize control and feel over raw power
- All-court players who require versatility in their racquet
- Players with full swings who can generate their own pace
- Those who enjoy a more traditional, control-oriented playing experience
Players who primarily seek maximum power or those with shorter, more compact swings may find the Flexpoint Radical Midplus less suitable for their game.
Durability and Long-Term Performance
When investing in a tennis racquet, durability and long-term performance are important considerations. How does the Flexpoint Radical Midplus hold up over time?
Our month-long playtest didn’t reveal any significant durability issues with the racquet. The frame appeared to maintain its structural integrity and performance characteristics throughout the testing period. However, long-term studies would be needed to fully assess the durability of the Flexpoint technology.
It’s worth noting that the presence of the engineered holes at the 3 and 9 o’clock positions could potentially make the frame more susceptible to damage if the racquet is subjected to severe impacts in those areas. Players should be mindful of this when considering the racquet for their game.
Final Thoughts on the HEAD Flexpoint Radical Midplus
The HEAD Flexpoint Radical Midplus represents an interesting evolution in racquet technology. While it may not revolutionize the game, it does offer noticeable improvements in feel and control compared to its predecessors.
Key takeaways from our review include:
- Enhanced feel and control, particularly on off-center hits
- Good spin potential despite the dense string pattern
- Improved touch for drop shots and volleys
- Potential for customization through string selection and tension
- Suitable for intermediate to advanced players seeking control and precision
Is the Flexpoint technology a game-changer? While it may not drastically alter your playing style, it does offer subtle improvements that discerning players will likely appreciate. The racquet’s ability to provide increased feel and control, especially on off-center hits, could translate to more consistent performance during match play.
Ultimately, the HEAD Flexpoint Radical Midplus is a solid choice for players who value precision and feel in their game. Its blend of control, spin potential, and versatility make it a worthy consideration for all-court players looking to elevate their performance.
As with any racquet, personal preference plays a significant role in determining the right fit. Players interested in the Flexpoint Radical Midplus would be well-advised to demo the racquet and experience its unique characteristics firsthand before making a purchase decision.
The tennis equipment market continues to evolve, with manufacturers constantly pushing the boundaries of technology and design. The HEAD Flexpoint Radical Midplus represents an interesting step in this evolution, offering a blend of traditional control-oriented performance with modern engineering aimed at enhancing feel and precision.
As players and coaches continue to explore the potential of this technology, it will be interesting to see how Flexpoint and similar innovations shape the future of tennis racquet design. Will we see further refinements of this concept in future models? Only time will tell, but for now, the Flexpoint Radical Midplus offers a compelling option for players seeking a control-oriented racquet with a touch of modern engineering.
| A Flex Point | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Flex Point on Impact | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flexpoint Radical MidplusGroundstrokesOur entire team enjoyed the Flexpoint Radical Midplus off the ground. Both Chris and Don compared the Flexpoint Radical Midplus to its Liquidmetal predecessor. Chris said, “I noticed a subtle but discernable difference in the feel of the Flexpoint Radical Midplus compared to the Liquidmetal Radical Midplus. Shots hit slightly off center seemed to come off the stringbed of the Flexpoint with a little more zip and depth compared to the Liquidmetal racquet. I also noticed that I could maintain better control and pace when hitting off balance or when catching the ball a little too close to my body. Apart from that, the Flexpoint Radical Midplus offered the same excellent response from the baseline that I loved when hitting with the Liquidmetal Radical Midplus. Spin potential and power also felt very similar, but I did find more touch when hitting droppers with the Flexpoint. VolleysThe Flexpoint Radical Midplus offered plenty of feel and control for our team at net. Finding good direction on his volleys was Brad. “Volleys with this racquet felt good. I found that I was able to direct the ball where I wanted and the higher swingweight of the racquet did not affect me at all. Don also found good stability, but would have preferred a more head light feel to the racquet. “The almost even-balance lends stability on volleys, although here again, I like a head-light racquet for quick net exchanges. Volleys were very solid but the racquet wasn’t as maneuverable as I would like. Good touch and feel, especially considering the dense string pattern.” Chris was very impressed with the Flexpoint Radical Midplus at net. “I found lots of feel and control at the net. There was a softer feel to the Flexpoint version of the Radical Midplus on the volley. The level of feel I found at net reminded me of a Prestige type feel and this is the first Radical I’ve found to offer that type of response. ServesWhile the amount of power and spin our team developed with the Flexpoint Radical Midplus on serve varied from player to player, everyone was serving with impressive consistency. Enjoying the feel of the 18/20 stringbed was Josh. “I liked the tighter string pattern of the Flexpoint Radical Midplus. The pattern seemed to compliment the 98 square-inch head size and my service game. My serves had a little extra pop and control, though my second serve didn’t kick as much as with the Tour model. This racquet felt very similar to the Dunlop 200G on serve.” Struggling to find his usual pace was Brad. “My serves were mediocre with this racquet. I felt like I was able to place them where I wanted, but didn’t feel like I could get as much pace as I normally do. Again, spin was not an issue even with the tighter string pattern.” Don found his targets consistently when serving with the Flexpoint Radical Midplus. Serve ReturnsThe controlled response of the Flexpoint Radical Midplus gave our team plenty of options when it came to hitting returns of serve. Finding plenty of maneuverability from the racquet was Brad. “I found that the lighter weight of this racquet made it easier to get prepared for returns. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Head Flexpoint Radical Midplus Combined Scores(Scores are determined by averaging individual play test scores)
Flexpoint Radical OversizeGroundstrokesImmediately noticeable to our team was the added power and the increased sweetspot size of the Flexpoint Radical Oversize compared to its Midplus sized brother. Also finding a lively response off the strings was Don. “The Flexpoint Radical Oversize is quite similar to the Liquidmetal Radical Oversize. Josh enjoyed the Flexpoint Radical the most when trading groundstrokes. “I was most pleased with my groundstrokes while playtesting the Flexpoint Radical Oversize. I was able to hit deep, consistent shots without much effort. The racquet provided decent topspin and the stringbed didn’t feel like a trampoline, as many oversized racquets do. I was confident hitting forehands and backhands on the move and I wasn’t concerned about holding back when I was stationary.” Comparing his experience with previous Radicals was Chris. “I found plenty of comfort and about as much power as I’d want from a player’s racquet with this one. VolleysOur team had a mixed experience with the Flexpoint Radical Oversize at net. Having good success at net was Brad. “Volleys with this racquet were comparable to the Midplus version. Wendi found the response of the Flexpoint Radical to be a little too lively. “At net the oversize was a little too responsive for my liking. I felt that the ball could go anywhere. I don’t think I am a good enough player to control this type of racquet at net. It was maneuverable and stable, but just too loose of a feel off the strings. I did think the flex was good, it’s definitely not a stiff racquet.” Unlike Wendi, Don enjoyed the lively response off the stringbed. “The larger head certainly made volleying easier. Josh said, “the headsize felt a bit larger than the listed 107 sq. inches. The racquet wasn’t necessarily cumbersome, but my reaction time during quick exchanges at net seemed slower than usual. Again, it didn’t take much to hit deep volleys and angled returns were fun to explore.” ServesOur team found good access to spin with the Flexpoint Radical Oversize when serving. Chris said, “I really enjoyed hitting kick serves with this racquet. I managed to get some nice angle on my kickers out wide to the ad side. Likewise, slice serve to the deuce side had some nice swerve to them. I enjoyed moving the ball around with this racquet and rarely went for a flat heater. I prefer hitting serves with spin and found this racquet to be a good fit for my service game.” Hitting some nice wide serves to the deuce side was Brad. Wendi would have liked a little more control on serves than she was finding with the Flexpoint radical Oversize. “My serving was very fluid with the Flexpoint Radical Oversize. I didn’t have any troubles settling in to my serves, and the power was nice. If I hadn’t played with the Flexpoint Radical Tour after this one, I’d say it was a great serving racquet. In comparison, the Oversize is again too powerful and maybe too open feeling. I wasn’t getting the feeling of being in control of the point. My serves were in play and hard, but easy to return. I didn’t have the precision that the Tour Midplus boasted.” Don found good results hitting a variety of serves. Serve ReturnsThe power and large sweetspot of the Flexpoint Radical transferred into some smooth and effortless returning for some members of our team. Don said, “this racquet was right at home for me when returning serves. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Head Flexpoint Radical Oversize Combined Scores(Scores are determined by averaging individual play test scores)
Review date: April 2005. If you found this review interesting or have further questions or comments please contact us. All content copyright 2005 Tennis Warehouse.
The Latest Gear as Seen in Paris Shop Now Father’s Day Gift Guide Discover Now Up to 50% Off Babolat Shoes Shop Now Up to 40% Off Top Brands Shop Now New Arrivals from Top Brands Discover Now Sunglasses, Hats, Hydration, & More Discover Now Save on Select Babolat String Shop Now
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HEAD also claims that the Flexpoint racquets result in more accurate hitting due to the cupping effect of the racquet. Few racquets are stiff enough to return to their original state before the ball leaves the strings, resulting in the racquet still being flexed and the ball coming off at a slight angle. HEAD claims that the sectionally flexible Flexpoint racquets significantly reduce the angle at which the ball leaves the strings, resulting in a more accurate hit.
Finding a good fit for his groundstroke game was Josh. “The Flexpoint Radical Midplus felt very easy to use on groundstrokes. My forehands and backhands felt effortless and smooth. I was able to consistently hit deep and controlled shots from both sides of the baseline. Topspin was decent and my backhand slice felt comfortable as a defensive shot or as an approach shot. Surprisingly, I had more success against bigger hitters than moderate players. I had a tendency to over-hit when I had less pace to work with, and my shots were less controlled.” After an initial adjustment Brad also found the Flexpoint Radical to be a good fit. “When I first started hitting with this racquet, I found myself getting out in front of the ball. However, once I got used to the weight and feel, I was able to place the ball where I wanted. I was worried that I wouldn’t be able to generate enough spin with this racquet due to the smaller head size and tight string pattern, but I didn’t find it an issue as long as I was prepared for the ball.
I did find that off-center shots usually landed well short. On the flip side, shots that hit the sweet spot had good depth and pace. Also, I felt really comfortable hitting backhands with this racquet.”
With more feel to it, I’d say the Flexpoint Radical Midplus is more string sensitive, too. By playing around with string and tension, I think there’s even more performance to be had here, which is impressive stuff.” Don offered, “the Flexpoint Radical Midplus swings and feels much like the Liquidmetal Radical, but with a little more feel. I’m not sure if this is due to Flexpoint or not. It also felt just a little more head-heavy (or less head light) than my recollection of the Liquidmetal Radical. This provided good stability, although I prefer a more head light balance. The dense string pattern still allowed for decent spin, and kept the stringbed from being too lively. Overall, it’s a nice medium-weight control racquet and would favor players with a fast swing.”
” Josh found a good blend of maneuverability and stability with the Flexpoint Radical Midplus on volleys. “The Flexpoint Radical Midplus was easy to maneuver at net and had good touch and control. Overhead volleys were solid and the racquet felt stable, whether I was digging down deep or stretching wide on a return volley.
Again, I was very impressed by the performance of this one and thought it was a solid update.”
However, when playing against those with bigger serves it would have been nice for this racquet to have a little more weight to it.” Don found himself exploiting the controlled response of the racquet by mixing up his return game. “Similar to the Liquidmetal Radical, the Flexpoint Radical MP provides choices on serve returns. I could block back big serves effectively, thanks to the racquet’s stability. Against most other serves, I could take some backswing. I found best results against second serves if I didn’t swing too hard, but ‘guided’ the ball to my intended target.”
“My return game felt good with the Flexpoint Radical Midplus. As with my groundstrokes, I felt comfortable with the balance of power and controlled depth of my returns. My slice backhand returns stayed firm, low, and deep, which gave me more variety on returns. The racquet also offered enough control that I could take a ball early and hit sharp-angled returns.”
Finding more spin with this one was Brad. “The bigger head size and increased flexibility allowed me to generate more spin than with the MP version of the racquet, However, I did find that the racquet was less stable on off-center shots.” Wendi found a smooth and powerful feel from the Flexpoint Radical Oversize. “The first thing that comes to mind is power. I had to make some adjustments with this big racquet because the power was a little overwhelming. I was hitting long so I really had to hold back on my normal aggressive swing. I was getting pretty good topspin, but not enough to make up for the power. It did feel very smooth when I hit through my swing; nice weight and feel. It had a loose feel off the strings, but the control aspect was decent. The Flexpoint Radical Oversize handled directional changes and quick moves to the net just fine.”
I enjoyed a little more flex and ‘bounce’ off the stringbed compared to the Midplus, but found the Oversize head didn’t ‘cut’ through the air quite as easily. Once I adjusted to this I was able to let the racquet do a little more work, which meant I didn’t have to swing as fast or as hard as with the Flexpoint Radical Midplus. There’s also more forgiveness during off-center shots, which was no surprise, given the larger head.”
With the Liquidmetal Radical OS I found myself launching a few groundstrokes into the back fence, but with the Flexpoint version this happened less. While the power level of the two was similar, I found a little more control and feel from the Flexpoint racquet. I would’ve liked to have hit with one at max tension to see if I found even more control. I also think a switch to an all poly stringbed or a poly/multi hybrid would bring more control and make the racquet better suited to stronger hitters. I used to use the original Twin Tube Radical Oversize as a teaching pro – finding it to be an arm friendly racquet for feeding balls, yet offering enough control for hitting with stronger students. I’ve yet to find a Radical racquet that offers the same amount of control. The Flexpoint version comes closer than any of its predecessors.”
I felt that I could place the ball where I wanted and I got good depth as long as I was prepared and in position.” Chris also enjoyed volleying with the Flexpoint Radical Oversize. “This one really felt solid on the volley and seemed to have a generous sweetspot. I also found the racquet to feel very maneuverable and enjoyed using it during a couple of doubles matches. I was finding good depth on punch volleys and more feel than with the Liquidmetal Radical OS on touch volleys.”
I liked the comfort and slightly livelier stringbed, compared to the Midplus. I also preferred the more head-light balance, which improved maneuverability. Overall, a solid performer at net.”
“I found my slice serve to be really effective with this racquet. I was effectively serving the ball out wide to the deuce side of the court on a consistent basis. In terms of pace, I found it to perform about thes same as the Midplus version, meaning I was finding my target but would have liked a little more power.”
“The Flexpoint Radical Oversize is easy to serve with. I was able to hit flat, slice and kick serves with good results. Nothing really stood out, but I served consistently and enjoyed the comfort and control.” Josh struggled to zone in on his targets but found plenty of spin from the Flexpoint Radical Oversize. “I had trouble serving to specific locations and could have used a little more power in the Flexpoint Radical Oversize. The racquet didn’t seem to offer much weight behind the ball either, but the spin potential was good enough to mix the serves up and keep my opponents guessing. The headsize also felt a bit larger than I had expected. The Flexpoint Radical Oversize was steady and dependable on second serves despite my lack of pace.”
I found my best returns came with abbreviated strokes, allowing the racquet and stringbed to do most of the work. When I had time I could take a good swipe at the ball, but I had to make sure I applied enough spin. Otherwise, the ball would tend to sail.” Josh found similar results. “Serve returns seemed effortless with the Flexpoint Radical Oversize. No need to take a huge backswing, but be sure to follow through or the ball could jump. As with my serves, I could have used a little more control on returns. I put a few sitters up against my doubles opponents that made for quick points.” Brad would have liked a little more pop on the return. “Serve returns with this racquet were nice when I had the time to prepare and get into position. However, when I was out of position or not prepared, I wasn’t able to get any pace on the ball.”
I found some good angles and was able to generate plenty of spin from a very short backswing. My mistakes came mostly from hitting long. Again, I think a change in string tension and/or string composition would have solved this problem and brought more control to my return game. On the plus side, the more powerful response made it very easy to block a return back, and getting good depth was effortless.” Wendi also had good results. “Returning serves with the oversize was one of the perks. It really handled my opponent’s serves well. I was able to take a fairly hard serve and turn it around to work in my favor. I had extra authority when I took it early and went for a sharp angle. The responsiveness felt great on returns, like a quick counter-punch.”
With its softer feel, the Flexpoint Radical Oversize brings some fresh performance to the Radical line. The response off the stringbed is lively, the comfort level is high and the spin potential is very impressive. The solid performance offered by this one should please the Oversize fans as well as tempt players of Midplus racquets to add a few sq. inches to their game.
A few pieces of lead tape could make this racquet very nice.
5-4.0 baseline player currently using a Yonex RDX 500 Midplus. Brad uses a semi-western forehand grip, has a medium swing style and hits a two-handed backhand.
Head FLEXPOINT 10 Tennis Racket / Racquet NEW demo
Pricing & History
- Sold for
Start Free Trial or
Sign In
to see what it’s worth.
- Sold Date
- Source
eBay
HEAD FLEXPOINT 10 Oversize Tennis Racquet NEW MSRP $149.
00 Specifications : Grip Size: 4 1/2 – 4 Head Size: 780 cm sq./ 121 in. sq. Length: 27 1/2 inches Beam: 31 mm String Pattern: 16/19 Swing Style Rating: S10 Weight: 235 grams / 8.3 oz Our Head Tennis Racquets come to you from a major sporting goods retailer’s overstock. This racquet has been on display and may have been handled. Upon visual inspection we found 1 tiny scuff on the frame. Overall it looks MINT! We posted accurate unedited pictures for your review so you can decide for yourself. Please feel free to ask questions as we check our eBay messages often and will respond quickly. PayPal Payment: Due within 2 days of purchase unless prior arrangements are made. Shipping: We ship using varied services via UPS, FedEx, and USPS and may substitute based on delivery time, price, and overall customer service. WE SHIP WORLDWIDE. International buyers are responsible for their home country’s customs and shipping restrictions. Return Policy: We will accept returns within 3 days of delivery.
Refunds are issued within 3 business days of return or sale cancellation. Refunds are given as money back or exchange. Buyer will pay for all shipping costs on any returned item. Please refer to manufacturer for warranty information. We strive to make your purchase a pleasant one but,
communication is key. If you have any questions, concerns, or would wish to return merchandise, please contact us as soon as possible. We look forward to exchanging positive feedback. Don’t Forget to Visit Our eBay Store for More Great Deals!!!
read more
Click below to begin your paid subscription.
Your credit card or PayPal account will be charged.
External view | Name | Short description | Price |
Head i. | Technology : Intelligence Material : Graphite Composite and Piezzo Electric Profile rims: 19 mm Size heads: 93″ / 600 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 330 gr. Balance (without strings): 315 mm. Length : 685 mm. / 26.97″ String Pattern: 18 x 20 Swing Style: L6 Grip : Head ComfortTac Traction | 4990 | |
Head i.S10 | Technology : Intelligence Material : Titanium/Graphite Profile Rims: Box+PowerFrame, Size heads: 114″ / 735 sq. Weight (without strings): 225 gr. Balance (without strings): 380 mm. Length : 705 mm. / 27.76″ String Pattern: 14 x 17 Swing Style: S10 Grip : Head ComfortTac Traction | 5990 | |
Head Liquidmetal Fire | Technology : Liquidmetal technology Material : LiquidMetal Titanium / Graphite and Piezzo Electric Fibers Profile rims: 23 / 25 / 21 mm Size heads: 102″ / 658 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 280 gr. Balance (without strings): 335 mm. Length : 695 mm. / 27.36″ String Pattern: 16 x 19 Swing Style: L1 Grip : Head HydroControl | 4650 | |
Head Liquid Metal Instinct | Technology : Liquidmetal technology Material : LiquidMetal Titanium / Graphite and Piezzo Electric Fibers Profile rims: 23 / 25 / 21 mm Size heads: 100″ / 645 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 295 gr. Balance (without strings): 320 mm. Length : 685 mm. / 26.97″ String Pattern: 18 x 19 Swing Style: L3 Grip : Head HydroControl | 5290 | |
Head Liquid Metal Prestige MID | Technology : Liquidmetal technology Material : LiquidMetal Titanium / Graphite and Piezzo Electric Fibers Profile rims: 19 mm Size heads: 93″ / 600 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 330 gr. Balance (without strings): 310 mm. Length : 685 mm. / 26.97″ String Pattern: 18 x 20 Swing Style: L6 Grip : Head HydroControl | 6890 | |
Head Liquid Metal Prestige MP | Technology : Liquidmetal technology Material : LiquidMetal Titanium / Graphite and Piezzo Electric Fibers Profile rims: 21 mm Size heads: 98″ / 632 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 320 gr. Balance (without strings): 310 mm. Length : 685 mm. String Pattern: 18 x 20 Swing Style: L6 Grip : Head HydroControl | 6890 | |
Head Liquid Metal Radical MP | Technology : Liquidmetal technology Material : LiquidMetal Titanium / Graphite and Piezzo Electric Fibers Profile rims: 21 mm Size heads: 98″ / 632 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 295 gr. Balance (without strings): 325 mm. Length : 685 mm. / 26.97″ String Pattern: 18 x 20 Swing Style: L4 Grip : Head HydroControl | 5060 | |
Head LiquidMetal Radical MP Tour | Technology : Liquidmetal technology Material : LiquidMetal Titanium / Graphite and Piezzo Electric Fibers Profile rims: 21 mm Size heads: 98″ / 632 sq. Weight (without strings): 325 gr. Balance (without strings): 315 mm. Length : 685 mm. / 26.97″ String Pattern: 18 x 20 Swing Style: L4 Grip : Head HydroControl | 5290 | |
Head LiquidMetal Radical OS | Technology : Liquidmetal technology Material : LiquidMetal Titanium / Graphite and Piezzo Electric Fibers Profile rims: 21 mm Size heads: 107″ / 690 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 295 gr. Balance (without strings): 320 mm. Length : 685 mm. / 26.97″ String Pattern: 18 x 19 Swing Style: L4 Grip : Head HydroControl | 5060 | |
Head Liquidmetal Rave | Technology : Liquidmetal technology Material : LiquidMetal Titanium / Graphite and Piezzo Electric Fibers Profile rims: 25 mm Size heads: 98″ / 632 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 285 gr. Balance (without strings): 330 mm. Length : 695 mm. / 27.36″ String Pattern: 16 x 19 Swing Style: L2 Grip : Head HydroControl | 5960 | |
Head Ti.S1 Supreme | Technology : Titanium Material : Titanium/Graphite Profile Rims: Boxshape, Size heads: 102″ / 658 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 255 gr. Length : 700 mm. / 27.56 String Pattern: 16 x 19 Swing Style: S1 Grip : Head SoftTac Cushion | 2490 | |
Head Nano Ti. | Material : Nano Titanium profile rims: 24 mm, Size heads: 102″ / 658 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 255 gr. Balance (without strings): 350 mm. Length : 685 mm. / 26.97″ String Pattern: 16 x 19 | 3560 | |
Head Nano Ti.Heat | Material : Nano Titanium profile rims: 22 mm, Size heads: 102″ / 658 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 265 gr. Balance (without strings): 345 mm. Length : 685 mm. / 26.97″ String Pattern: 16 x 19 | 3350 | |
Head Nano Ti.S1 | Material : Nano Titanium profile rims: 26 mm, Size heads: 107″ / 690 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 250 gr. Balance (without strings): 345 mm. Length : 695 mm. / 27.36″ String Pattern: 16 x 19 | 3340 | |
Head Nano Ti. | Material : Nano Titanium profile rims: 25 mm, Size heads: 102″ / 658 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 245 gr. Balance (without strings): 360 mm. Length : 695 mm. / 27.36″ String Pattern: 16 x 19 | 3560 | |
Head Nano Ti.S4 | Material : Nano Titanium profile rims: 26 mm, Size heads: 107″ / 690 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 240 gr. Balance (without strings): 355 mm. Length : 690 mm. / 27.17″ String Pattern: 16 x 19 | 3560 | |
Head Protector MP | Technology : Electronic Dampening System (EDS) Profile rims: 26 mm Size heads: 102″ / 658 sq. cm Weight (without strings): 265 gr. Balance (without strings): 355 mm. Length : 695 mm. / 27.36″ String Pattern: 16 x 19 Swing Style: S3 Grip : Head Protector Cushion | 9890 | |
Head Protector OS | Technology : Electronic Dampening System (EDS) Profile rims: 28 mm Size heads: 115″ / 742 sq. Weight (without strings): 260 gr. Balance (without strings): 375 mm. Length : 703 mm. / 27.68″ String Pattern: 16 x 19 Swing Style: S9 Grip : Head Protector Cushion | 9890 |
She made
Prestige MID 
cm
41 oz.
/ 26.97″
cm
Fire 
S2 
cmAkces-Med Sp. z o.o. – Producent Przedmiotów Ortopedycznych GIPPO™ | Akces-Med Sp. z o.o. 2
Size chart
| Symbol | Measurement | Unit | Size 1 mini | Size 1 maxi | Size 2 mini | Size 2 maxi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | Approximate user height** | [cm] | 70 – 100 | 70 – 100 | 90 — 120 | 90 — 120 |
| A | Seat width | [cm] | 20*/ 31 | 15 – 31 | 34 | 17 – 35. 5 |
| L | Seat depth | [cm] | 25 | 19 – 30 | 30 | 20*** / 25-35.5 |
| B | back height | [cm] | 40*/45 | 44 — 55 | 55 | 50*** / 55-64 |
| C | headrest height | [cm] | 40 – 51*/ 44 – 54 | 40 – 51*/ 44 – 54 | 55 — 64 | 55 — 64 |
| E | Back width | [cm] | 31 | 31 | 34 | 34 |
| F | Footboard length | [cm] | 0 – 8 (top mount) 15 – 25 (bottom mount) | 10 – 25 | 0 – 11 (top mount) 18 – 28 (bottom mount) | 18 – 33 |
| Foot length | [cm] | 14 | 14 | 18. 5 | 18.5 | |
| X | Backrest angle | [°] | 90 – 150 | 90 – 150 | 90 – 150 | 90 – 150 |
| Y | Seat angle | [°] | 10 | 30 | 10 | 30 |
| Z | Footrest angle | [°] | 90 – 180 | 90 – 180 | 90 – 180 | 90 – 180 |
| Max. user weight | [kg] | 25 | 25 | 35 | 35 |
ATTENTION: The tolerance of the dimensions indicated in the table is +/- 1.5 cm.
*The measurement is measured from the seat narrowing cushion.
**Height measurement should not be the basis for equipment sizing.
***Measurement is measured from the side cushions narrowing the depth, width, height of the seat
How to measure the user? – press
Product weight and dimensions
| Measurement | Unit | Size 1 | Size 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | [cm] | 66 | 66 |
| Length | [cm] | 118 | 120 |
| Height | [cm] | 105 | 113 |
| Folded width | [cm] | 64 | 67 |
| Folded length | [cm] | 112 | 112 |
| Folded height | [cm] | 56 | 56 |
| Weight | [kg] | 19 | 21 |
ATTENTION: The tolerance of the dimensions indicated in the table is +/- 1.
