What shaft does paul rabil use. Paul Rabil’s Lacrosse Shaft: Unveiling the Warrior Burn Pro Carbon Fiber

What new lacrosse shaft is Paul Rabil using. How does the Warrior Burn Pro Carbon Fiber shaft compare to other options. What are the key features and benefits of this innovative lacrosse equipment.

Table of Contents

The Evolution of Paul Rabil’s Lacrosse Shaft Choices

Paul Rabil, one of the most renowned professional lacrosse players, has long been associated with Warrior lacrosse equipment. His choice of shaft has evolved over the years, reflecting advancements in technology and his own playing style. Recently, Rabil showcased a new addition to his arsenal – the Warrior Burn Pro Carbon Fiber shaft.

Introducing the Warrior Burn Pro Carbon Fiber Shaft

In a recent YouTube vlog, Paul Rabil unveiled Warrior’s latest innovation in lacrosse shaft technology – the Burn Pro Carbon Fiber shaft. This new offering represents a significant leap forward in terms of both weight and durability, two crucial factors for high-level lacrosse play.

Impressive Weight Reduction

One of the most striking features of the Burn Pro Carbon Fiber shaft is its incredibly light weight. In his vlog, Rabil demonstrated that the shaft weighs a mere 119 grams. To put this into perspective, an iPhone X weighs 174 grams. This significant weight reduction could potentially translate to faster shots and more agile stick handling on the field.

Strength and Durability Testing

Despite its lightweight nature, the Burn Pro Carbon Fiber shaft appears to boast impressive strength. Rabil subjected the shaft to various stress tests in his vlog, including cross-checking and slap-checking wooden pallets. While the exact force applied is unclear, the shaft seemed to withstand the impacts without visible damage.

Further testing was showcased at a Warrior factory, where specialized machines apply controlled pressure to the shafts. One particularly striking image showed the Burn Pro placed between two supports, with a hydraulic wedge applying downward force in the middle – a testament to the rigorous quality control measures employed in its production.

The Rise of Carbon Fiber in Lacrosse Equipment

The Warrior Burn Pro Carbon Fiber shaft is part of a larger trend in lacrosse equipment manufacturing. Carbon fiber technology has been gaining traction across various sporting goods, and lacrosse is no exception. But why is carbon fiber becoming so popular in lacrosse shaft production?

Exceptional strength-to-weight ratio
Ability to fine-tune flex and responsiveness
Potential for improved energy transfer in shots
Resistance to temperature changes and environmental factors

As players at all levels seek equipment that can enhance their performance, carbon fiber shafts offer a compelling combination of lightweight design and durability.

Comparing the Burn Pro to Traditional Alloy Shafts

While carbon fiber technology is making waves, it’s important to consider how the Burn Pro compares to more traditional alloy shafts, such as the Warrior Rabil 99 Diamond.

Warrior Rabil 99 Diamond: A Closer Look

The Rabil 99 Diamond, another shaft designed in collaboration with Paul Rabil, offers its own set of advantages:

Constructed from high-grade European alloy
Optimized for strength-to-weight ratio
Features an 8-sided traditional shape
Diamond grip pattern for enhanced control

While the Rabil 99 Diamond remains a popular choice, the Burn Pro Carbon Fiber shaft appears to push the boundaries even further in terms of weight reduction.

Impact on Playing Style and Performance

The introduction of ultra-lightweight carbon fiber shafts like the Burn Pro could potentially influence playing styles and performance on the field. How might these technological advancements affect various aspects of the game?

Shot Speed and Accuracy

A lighter shaft could contribute to increased shot speed, as players may be able to generate more velocity with less effort. Additionally, the reduced weight might allow for finer control, potentially improving accuracy on both shots and passes.

Dodging and Stick Handling

With a lighter shaft, players may find it easier to execute quick direction changes and intricate stick handling maneuvers. This could be particularly advantageous for midfielders and attackmen who rely on agility to create scoring opportunities.

Defensive Play

Even defensive players could benefit from a lighter shaft, as it may allow for quicker checks and improved reaction time when battling for ground balls.

The Manufacturing Process: A Glimpse into Warrior’s Production

Rabil’s vlog provided a rare look into Warrior’s manufacturing facilities, offering insights into the production process of these high-tech lacrosse shafts.

Leveraging Hockey Stick Technology

Interestingly, the footage revealed that Warrior is drawing upon its experience in hockey stick manufacturing to produce these advanced lacrosse shafts. The facility shown in Mexico appears to primarily focus on Warrior Hockey sticks, suggesting a cross-pollination of technologies between the two sports.

Quality Control and Testing

The vlog highlighted sophisticated testing equipment used to evaluate the strength and durability of the shafts. These machines apply controlled stress to ensure that each shaft meets Warrior’s rigorous standards before reaching players’ hands.

The Future of Lacrosse Equipment Technology

The unveiling of the Warrior Burn Pro Carbon Fiber shaft by Paul Rabil offers a glimpse into the future of lacrosse equipment. As manufacturers continue to push the boundaries of materials science and engineering, what other innovations might we see in the coming years?

Potential Areas for Advancement

Smart technology integration for performance tracking
Further customization options for individual playing styles
Sustainable materials that maintain high performance standards
Improved shock absorption for reduced player fatigue

As the sport of lacrosse continues to grow in popularity, we can expect to see ongoing advancements in equipment technology, driven by the needs of players at all levels of the game.

Choosing the Right Shaft for Your Game

While the Warrior Burn Pro Carbon Fiber shaft represents the cutting edge of lacrosse technology, it’s important for players to consider their individual needs when selecting equipment. What factors should players consider when choosing a lacrosse shaft?

Key Considerations for Shaft Selection

Playing position and style
Personal preference for weight and balance
Budget constraints
League or team regulations
Durability requirements based on playing conditions

Ultimately, the best shaft for any player is the one that allows them to perform at their highest level while feeling comfortable and confident on the field.

The Impact of Professional Endorsements on Equipment Trends

Paul Rabil’s showcase of the Warrior Burn Pro Carbon Fiber shaft highlights the significant influence that professional players have on equipment trends in lacrosse. How do these endorsements shape the choices of amateur and youth players?

The “Pro Player Effect”

When top athletes like Paul Rabil endorse new equipment, it often creates a ripple effect throughout the lacrosse community. Young players, in particular, may be eager to emulate their heroes by using the same gear. This can drive innovation and push manufacturers to continually improve their offerings.

Balancing Hype and Performance

While professional endorsements can generate excitement around new products, it’s crucial for players and parents to evaluate equipment based on individual needs and skill levels. Not every player will benefit from the most advanced (and often most expensive) gear on the market.

As the lacrosse equipment landscape continues to evolve, players at all levels will have access to increasingly sophisticated tools to enhance their game. The Warrior Burn Pro Carbon Fiber shaft, as showcased by Paul Rabil, represents just one example of the innovative spirit driving the sport forward. Whether you’re a professional athlete or a weekend warrior, staying informed about these advancements can help you make the best choices for your lacrosse journey.

Rabil Shows Off A New Burn Pro Carbon Fiber Shaft

Rabil Shows Off A New Burn Pro Carbon Fiber Shaft | Universal Lacrosse Blog

Free Shipping – Orders Over $99

MDW – 5% Cash Back Rewards

Lacrosse’s Best Rewards Program

Apr 13, 2018

Professional lacrosse player and Warrior sponsored athlete, Paul Rabil showed off Warrior’s newest shaft last night on his youtube v-log; a seemingly Burn Pro Carbon Fiber Shaft. No exaggeration, this shaft is a beast. Carbon Fiber shafts appear to be on the rise in the sport of lacrosse. All of the top brands have been coming out with their own versions. With new technologies making these handles lighter and stronger it’s really no surprise more and more players are moving towards them. After all, a lighter shaft could mean faster shots or harder stick checks. The trouble is an obvious one. While these shafts get lighter, how do you keep them as strong as titanium? This question is way out of our league as we do not make composite handles. It seems like Warrior is making strides in the right direction.

While there isn’t a whole lot of information about a new Burn Pro Carbon Fiber, what Rabil showed off in his Vlog speaks volumes. Let’s talk about the weight. For reference, an iPhone X comes in weighing 174g. In his Vlog, Rabil puts the Burn Pro on the scale and it comes in weighing 119g. That’s light. What’s even more impressive is the apparent strength of this handle. Paul Rabil is a strong guy, this shouldn’t be news to anyone. What SHOULD be news though is the apparent strength of the Warrior Bun Pro. In his Vlog, Rabil takes the handle and walks up to some wood shipping pallets, and starts to cross check and slap check the handle of the pallets. Now, it should be made clear that there’s no telling how hard he was hitting this carbon fiber Burn Pro on those pallets, but it appears he’s not taking it easy on it. Okay, slightly impressive. A little later on they drive down to a Warrior factory where they build the handles. Here’s where the real strength testing is done. The footage shows some machines that are supposed to test the strength of the handles. The image of the handle between two supports, being pushed down in the middle by a hydraulic wedge, is something to behold. See the below screen shot from Rabil’s Vlog.

It appears that Warrior is taking a page right out of the hockey book as Rabil tours the facility in Mexico that seemingly focuses primarily in manufacturing Warrior Hockey Sticks. Sign us up. As of right now all we have to go off of is Rabil’s Vlog. As the handle gets closer to release we’ll learn more about what capabilities it possesses. Until then go check out Rabil’s Vlog and see for yourself.

Warrior Rabil 99 Diamond Lacrosse Shaft Review

Brand:

Warrior

Position:

Attack, Faceoff, Midfield

Grade:

Men’s

Shaft Composition:

Alloy

Shaft Length:

30″

Shaft Diameter:

1″

Warranty:

30 days

Overall:

Strength:

Weight:

Paul Rabil is one of the most renowned lacrosse player of all time. He is especially noted for his ability to score goals on the run. He had also previously held the record for the highest shot speed out of anyone on the face of the planet.

The Warrior Rabil 99 diamond shaft was designed by Warrior’s Pro Paul Rabil and constructed from the highest grade European alloy in order for the best strength to weight ratio possible. This has created an incredibly strong shaft while still being light for its competition.

This shaft was born for creating havoc for opponents in the middle of the field. The strength and light weight profile of the shaft will help you rip from the outside. Additionally the diamond grip helps you grip the shaft while you run down the field through checks the defenders impose.

Material and Weight

The Rabil 99 shaft is made of premium European alloy specifically for an unparalleled strength to weight ratio.

Rabil wanted a shaft that fit his playstyle which is an on the move, grip and rip type attitude. It is light, and it is strong; two things that make this a valuable ally on the lacrosse field.

Shape

The shape of the Rabil 99 is an 8 sided traditional shaft that responds to the way you move your hands. It is important that the shaft feel comfortable in your hands in order for you to play to your maximum potential. And that is exactly what the Rabil 99 is; comfortable.

Grip

The grip on the Rabil 99 is a diamond grip and is potentially the most important and beneficial aspect of this shaft. Rabil wanted a grip that would provide him the ability to be on the move and still shoot bullets past the goalie.

With this Diamond pro grip, you have no need to tape your stick up to help your hands shoot the ball. The sandy texture from the shaft is perfect traction for your gloves to pull down hard and shoot the ball with incredible velocity.

From the wise words of sir mixalot, I like the larger butt end on the Rabil 99 in order to be able to grip and rip from anywhere on the field.

Wear and Tear

The high grade European alloy not only gives this shaft an incredible strength to weight ratio, but it also is very durable and can withstand just about any check a defender throws at you. There is nothing worse than having to run off the field with a broken stick.

Summary

The Rabil 99 can be an incredible asset to your game, especially if you are a run and gun type midfielder. Paul Rabil did a very good job of designing a shaft that addresses all aspects of a good shaft.

The Diamond Pro grip is one of the most unique grips that provides a subtle touch that makes your shot easier to execute.

It is clear to me that Paul Rabil and others did a great job of paying attention to the little things that make a shaft work. That is why the Rabil 99 Diamond shaft is an incredible weapon to bring into battle with you.

The Warrior Rabil 99 comes in Silver and Black and is covered by Warriors 30 day return policy.

Shafts KR vs. ABF – GTI / Tuning – Golf2club.com

#1
Romaka

Sent by 23 November 2012 – 00:54 AM

The question arose, which shafts are best for a turbo?
The head of the KR 027. there are shafts of the KR (after the Taz ones, they already seemed huge)
I was looking for information on the open spaces of the network. found some data on the rises of the shafts: KR shafts (inlet 9.6 issue 10.3) ABF (inlet and outlet 10.8)
looking at the climbs, ABF pulls ahead) but what about the phases of things?
write about KR shafts, which is better for turbo, because they work better in the range of 5000-7000 rpm.

Your opinions, options, advice? Thank you in advance

Post has been editedRomaka: 23 November 2012 – 07:59 AM

#2
Vintalik

Sent by 23 November 2012 – 06:47 AM

depending on what the machine is for! if you ride in the city, then you need grassroots shafts so that there is less dynamics on the unclenched motor before the turbo spins up. And the KR shafts are not grassroots.
turbo shafts, in my opinion, are all “tractor” and when the turbo spins up, it doesn’t really care, it pushes the mixture anyway, creating the worst torque. And it doesn’t really matter whether the cutoff is 5000 or 7000 rpm

#3
Wind

Sent by 23 November 2012 – 08:33 AM

set ABF

#4
dimazzik

Sent by 23 November 2012 – 11:04 AM

http://www.bahnbrenn…aft_Set_268_260
or Pikotkin shafts

#5
Guest_Ilko_*

Sent by 23 November 2012 – 11:18 AM

or shrik

#6
vovchik

Submitted by 23 November 2012 – 19:53 PM

depending on what the machine is for! if you ride in the city, then you need grassroots shafts so that there is less dynamics on the unclenched motor before the turbo spins up. And the KR shafts are not grassroots.
turbo shafts, in my opinion, are all “tractor” and when the turbo spins up, it doesn’t really care, it pushes the mixture anyway, creating the worst torque. And it doesn’t really matter whether the cutoff is 5000 or 7000 about

I haven’t read such nonsense in my life ….
ABF shafts are much cooler than KRv ones .. and just from the bottom the car starts to go after installing ABF shafts ….
it’s better not to write anything than what you ….

dude, take the ABF shafts for the turbo, that’s it, I myself personally went both in the atmosphere and in the turbo …

#7
Romaka

Submitted by 23 November 2012 – 23:34 PM

is a little unclear. I would like more facts.
I’m just guided by this.
KR, engine 1.8, has 140 forces, due to the refinement of the cylinder head. ABF motor, it is already 2 liters and already 150 horses. but also more volume.
Such information is interesting: after all, the CD is considered to be a formed internal combustion engine, right? how is the ABF? is he forced? or not?

#8
Rabbit GTI

Submitted by 23 November 2012 – 23:35 PM

ABF shafts Very steep shafts. but there are cooler

#9
degree

Sent by 24 November 2012 – 00:14 AM

ABF shafts Very steep shafts. but is there cooler

KR?)))

#10
Romaka

Sent by 24 November 2012 – 00:26 AM

ABF shafts Very steep shafts. but there are cooler ones

)

#eleven
Guest_Ilko_*

Sent by 24 November 2012 – 00:32 AM

KR?)))

Top
#12
KostyaB

Sent by 24 November 2012 – 09:47 AM
depending on what the machine is for! if you ride in the city, then you need grassroots shafts so that there is less dynamics on the unclenched motor before the turbo spins up. And the KR shafts are not grassroots.
turbo shafts, in my opinion, are all “tractor” and when the turbo spins up, it doesn’t really care, it pushes the mixture anyway, creating the worst torque. And it doesn’t really matter whether the cutoff is 5000 or 7000 about
and from what speed do you think the turbo comes in?
sorry, can’t resist.
Top
#13
Gendos

Sent by 24 November 2012 – 11:41 AM
did anyone compare … 2 exhaust shafts with split gears and abf shafts …
abf is much better or about 1 and the same ?.
just have the ability to make times. gear. almost free. and there are exhaust shafts.
and ABF shafts cost 7000 rubles at the very least. is it worth it?
Top
#14
Vladimir2006

Submitted by 24 November 2012 – 14:31 PM
and from what speed do you think the turbo comes?
sorry, can’t resist.
Whatever you put, the income will be from so many.
Post has been editedVladimir2006: 24 November 2012 – 14:40 PM
Top
#15
Rabbit GTI

Sent by 24 November 2012 – 15:10 PM
and from what speed, in your opinion, does the turbo come in?
sorry, can’t resist.
I have shafts abf turbine 3076 3700 rpm – 1 bar and this is about 330-340 forces (at 1.2 bar – 380 forces)
Top
#16
KostyaB

Sent 24 November 2012 – 20:47 PM
I’m not getting into polemics. just manufacturers draw a shelf from 2000 to
4500 maximum torque. and power is usually 4000-4500-5000 for turbo. the degree of boost usually does not play a role for them. more precisely, the characteristics increase with increasing pressure, but the speed is about the same. who thinks about this?
Top
#17
levis

Sent by 25 November 2012 – 00:00 AM
I don’t get into controversy. just manufacturers draw a shelf from 2000 to
4500 maximum torque. and power is usually 4000-4500-5000 for turbo. the degree of boost usually does not play a role for them. more precisely, the characteristics increase with increasing pressure, but the speed is about the same. who thinks about this?
if you are talking about stock turbo buckets. my opinion on this matter is that manufacturers are trying to make more balanced turbo engines that, first of all, should satisfy ordinary citizens, and not turbo maniacs who drive in the 6000-8000rpm range. an ordinary man in the street does not need such speeds, he just needs to overtake a thread of a basin on the track quickly and comfortably + everything starts to crumble at speeds.
Top
#18
fisk777

Sent by 25 November 2012 – 00:13 AM
the kr shafts have a torque somewhere from 3500 to 6000 and higher (but when you try to accelerate from 100 km in 5th gear, there will be quite a noticeable turbo lag)
abf from 2000 to 6000 the turbo lag will not be so noticeable (but it will go worse)
well, if you drive a car only gas floor then the shafts from kr
Post has been edited by fisk777: 25 November 2012 – 00:17 AM
Top
#19
Romaka

Sent by 25 November 2012 – 05:16 AM
the kr shafts have a torque somewhere from 3500 to 6000 and above (but when you try to accelerate from 100 km in 5th gear, there will be quite a noticeable turbo lag)
abf from 2000 to 6000 the turbo lag will not be so noticeable (but it will be worse at high speeds) experience?
It’s still interesting to hear what Rabit and Lewis have to say)
Top
#20
levis

Sent by 25 November 2012 – 10:51 AM
Hmmm. .interesting, is it a theoretical opinion or is there any experience?
It is still interesting to hear what Rabit and Levis will say)
on shafts it is better to Rabbit
but my opinion is better to put ABF shafts
here for shaft comparison:
KR ( 1.8L 16V) 212 ° 226 ° 9, 6 mm / 10.3 mm Ventilhub
ABF(2.0L 16V) 220° 228° 10.8 mm / 10.8 mm Ventilhub
abf should ride better on top
Top
Proceedings of mudflow conferences – in the library elibrary.ru (RSCI)
Saturday January 13th, 2018
1938-2018
The Presidium of the Mudflow Association announces with deep regret that on January 3, 2018, the outstanding researcher of mudflows in Siberia and the Far East, Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences, Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of Paleogeodynamics of the Institute of the Earth’s Crust of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, member of the Mudflow Association Valery Kirillovich Laperdin, died.
V.K. Laperdin was born on July 26, 1938 in the Priargunsky district of the Chita region. In 1966 he graduated from the Faculty of Geography of the Irkutsk University with a degree in Geographer, Physical Geographer. From 1964 to 1997 worked at the Institute of the Earth’s Crust (IZK) of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences (since 1992 – the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences) in positions from a laboratory assistant to a senior researcher. In 1997–2002 worked outside the system of the Academy of Sciences. In 2002–2004 – Chief Specialist of the Laboratory of Engineering Geology and Geoecology of the IGC SB RAS, in 2004-2008. – Senior researcher of the same laboratory, in 2008-2018. – Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Paleogeodynamics.
In 1976 he defended his Ph.D. thesis on the topic “The role of exogenous geological processes in the formation of mudflows in the Eastern Sayan”, in 2004 – a doctoral dissertation on the topic “Regularities of the development of exogenous geological processes in the Sayan-Baikal mountain region in the zone of influence of linear structures. ”
V.K. Laperdine was a specialist in engineering geodynamics. His scientific interests were related to the study of the formation factors of especially dangerous endogenous and exogenous geological processes, the forecast of their development and distribution, as well as the development of principles for protection against geological hazards and environmental instability within the created zones of influence of linear natural and technical systems, railways and highways, communication and power lines.
Conducted research on natural and technogenic factors in the areas of oil and gas transportation complexes in Eastern Siberia. According to his methodology, geodynamic stations were created to study the weathering rate factors and the dynamics of the destruction products of bedrocks under cryogenesis conditions in the republics of Buryatia, Sakha (Yakutia), Tuva, in the Irkutsk, Chita and Amur regions, the Krasnoyarsk Territory. This made it possible to obtain parameters for assessing the stability of loose clastic material depending on the steepness, exposure of slopes and seismic activity of the territory, to establish patterns of development and spread of dangerous exogenous geological processes and to give them a quantitative and qualitative assessment at the regional level.
V.K. Laperdin was the author of more than 70 scientific papers, a laureate of the USSR Council of Ministers Prize (1988), a laureate of the regional competition in the field of science and technology in 2011 in the nomination “For a significant contribution to the development of science and technology and solving socio-economic problems of the Irkutsk region” for the monograph ” Geodynamics of hazardous processes in the zones of natural-technogenic complexes of Eastern Siberia ”(Irkutsk, 2010), Honored Veteran of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Awarded with medals “For the construction of the Baikal-Amur Mainline” (1983), “Veteran of Labour”, Gold Medal of VDNKh of the USSR (1980), Diploma of the IPC SB RAS (2008).
More than 20 years V.K. Laperdin represented Siberia and the Far East in the All-Union Village Commission. For merits in the field of mudflow science, he was awarded the highest award of the Mudflow Association – the Fleishman medal (2016).
We offer our deepest condolences to the family and friends of V.K. Laperdin.
The bright memory of Valery Kirillovich Laperdine will forever remain in our hearts.
Presidium of the Mudflow Association
List of scientific works of V.K. Laperdina
(in chronological order)
Laperdin V.K. Mudflows in the central part of the Udokan ridge. – In: Questions of Geology of the Baikal and Transbaikalia. Issue 3 (5). Chita, 1968, pp. 224-227.
Laperdin V.K. Experience in the use of vegetation for the study of mudflows (on the example of the Eastern Sayan). – Collection of works of the Irkutsk GMO, 1970, issue 5, pp. 32-34.
Laperdin V.K. To the formation of solifluction mudflows in the upper reaches of the Uda, Biryusa and Kazyra rivers. – In: V Conference of Young Researchers. Abstracts of reports (ISK). Irkutsk, 1971, pp. 77-79.
Laperdin V.K. Application of the dendrochronological method to determine the frequency of passage of mudflows (on the example of the Sayan-Baikal mountainous country). – In: Geology and mineral resources of Eastern Siberia. Irkutsk, 1971, pp. 134-136.
Laperdin V.K., Rybak O.L., Furman M.Sh. Issues of assessing the mudflow hazard in the areas of development of the Sayano-Baikal mountainous country. – In: II Conference on Applied Geography [Institute of Geography of Siberia and the Far East]. (Abstracts of reports and messages). Irkutsk, 1971, p.110-114.
Laperdin V.K., Demyanovich N.I., Trzhtsinsky Yu.B. Catastrophic summer floods of 1971 and slope processes. – In: Hydrogeology and petrochemistry of Eastern Siberia, methods of geological research (IZK). Irkutsk, 1972, pp. 19-23.
Arsentiev G.I., Demina G.I., Kara E.G., Furman M.Sh., Laperdin V.K., Leshchikov F.N., Pinegin A.V., Rogozin A.A. Trzhtsinsky Yu.B. Summer floods of 1971 in the Baikal region and their consequences. – In: Floods in the Far East and measures to combat them. (Abstracts of reports at the zonal meeting on the problems of studying and combating floods in the Far East). Vladivostok, 1972, pp. 26-29.
Laperdin V.K., Trzhtsinsky Yu.B. Mudflow formation factors in the central part of the Udokan Ridge. – In: Issues of hydrogeology and engineering geology of Eastern Siberia. Irkutsk, 1974, pp. 93-100.
Laperdin V.K., Trzhtsinsky Yu.B. Mapping mudflows of the Eastern Sayan. – In: Proceedings of the scientific and technical meeting on the methods of mudflow mapping (abstracts). Tbilisi, 1974, pp. 20-21.
Laperdin V.K. The role of exogenous geological processes in the formation of mudflows in the Eastern Sayan. Abstract of diss. for the academic degree cand. geol.-mineral. Sciences. Irkutsk, 1975. 26 p. (AN SSSR. SO. IZK).
Laperdin V.K. The role of exogenous geological processes in the formation of mudflows in the Eastern Sayan. – In: Modern studies of the earth’s crust (scientific information on the results of the work of the Institute of the Earth’s Crust in 1974). Irkutsk, 1975, pp. 160-163.
Laperdin V.K., Trzhtsinsky Yu. B. Engineering-geological zoning of the Southern Baikal region according to the degree of mudflow hazard. – In: Modern studies of the earth’s crust (scientific information on the results of the work of the Institute of the Earth’s Crust in 1974). Irkutsk, 1975, pp. 149-151.
Laperdin V.K. Glazes of the Eastern Sayan and their role in the development of mudflows. – Notes of the Trans-Baikal branch of the USSR Civil Defense, 1976, issue 101, pp. 107-110.
Laperdin V.K., Trzhtsinsky Yu.B. The role of weathering in the formation of the solid phase of mudflows (on the example of the Eastern Sayan). – In: Geological factors of formation of landslides and mudflows and questions of their assessment. M., Publishing House of Moscow State University, 1976, pp. 49-54.
Dumitrashko N.V., Aizenberg E.M., Budagov B.A., Laperdin V.K., Oliferov A.N., Pushkarenko V.P., Tsovyan M.V. Mapping of mudflow-prone areas on medium and large scales in connection with the forecast of mudflow events. – In: Problems of engineering geology in connection with the rational use of the geological environment. Topics II-III. L., 1976, pp. 108-113.
Laperdin V.K., Trzhtsinsky Yu.B. Exogenous geological processes and mudflows of the Eastern Sayan. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1977. 103 p.
Laperdin V.K., Makarov S.A., Trzhtsinsky Yu.B. Development conditions and characteristics of some slope processes in the Chara-Tynda section. – In: Geological and seismic conditions of the Baikal-Amur Mainline region. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1978, pp. 69-78.
Trzhtsinsky Yu.B., Leshchikov F.N., Laperdin V.K., Agafonov B.P. Exogenous geological processes in the areas of critical structures of the BAM route. – In: Seismic hazard and earthquake-resistant construction of the BAM region. Abstracts of the visiting session of the Interdepartmental Council on Seismology and Earthquake-Resistant Construction under the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Irkutsk, 1979, p.24-25.
Laperdin V. K. Exodynamic processes of the northern slope of the South Muya Range. – Geography and natural resources, 1984, No. 2, p.69-78.
Laperdin V.K., Ryashchenko T.G. Conditions for the development of geological processes in the area of the Severo-Muisky tunnel. – In: Problems of anti-mudflow measures. Alma-Ata, “Kazakhstan”, 1984, pp. 145-152.
Laperdin V.K. Issues of mapping exogenous geological processes at different scales. – In: Aerospace and ground-based studies of the dynamics of natural processes in Siberia. Irkutsk, 1984, p.58-63.
Laperdin V.K. To the question of morpholithogenesis and denudation in the periglacial belt of the south of Eastern Siberia. – Geography and natural resources, 1985, No. 1, p.54-61.
Zarubin N.E., Laperdin V.K., Trzhtsinsky Yu.B. 2.1. Exogenous geological processes (EGP). – In: Geology and seismicity of the BAM zone (from Baikal to Tynda). Engineering geology and engineering seismology. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1985, pp. 19-41.
Laperdin V.K., Trzhtsinsky Yu.B. 3.1. Zoning of the BAM zone according to geodynamic conditions. – In: Geology and seismicity of the BAM zone (from Baikal to Tynda). Engineering geology and engineering seismology. Novosibirsk, Science, 1985, pp. 47-53.
Laperdin V.K., Trzhtsinsky Yu.B. 3.2. Some recommendations for protecting the highway from the effects of EGP. – In: Geology and seismicity of the BAM zone (from Baikal to Tynda). Engineering geology and engineering seismology. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1985, pp. 53-56.
Laperdin V.K., Trzhtsinsky Yu.B. Seismotectonics of the Baikal rift zone as a basis for predicting exogenous geological processes. – In: Changes in the geological environment and their forecast. Novosibirsk, 1985, pp. 49-59.
Laperdin V.K. Relationship “Man – nature” in the southern Baikal region. – In: Problems of anti-mudflow measures. Alma-Ata, 1986, pp. 95-100.
Laperdin V.K. Natural conditions for the development of exogenous geological processes in the area of the Udokan deposit. – In: Physical and technical problems of the north of Transbaikalia. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1987, pp. 75-83.
Laperdin V.K. Exogenous geological processes in the area of the Udokan deposit. – In: Engineering Geodynamics and Geological Environment. Novosibirsk, Science, 1989, pp. 52-57.
Laperdin V.K. Relationship between man and nature in the Southern Baikal region. – In: Problems of engineering geology, hydrogeology and geocryology of areas of intensive engineering load and protection of the geological environment. Abstracts of the First All-Union Congress of Engineers-Geologists, Hydrogeologists and Geocryologists. Kyiv, October 10-14, 1988. In six parts. Part 3. Kyiv, Naukova Dumka, 1989, pp. 138-140.
Laperdin V.K. Exodynamic processes in the basins of the left tributaries of the Angara. – In: Hydrogeology and engineering geology of Siberia. Novosibirsk, Science, 1990, pp. 106-111.
Laperdin V.K. Natural conditions along the communication cable route (south of Eastern Siberia). – Geography and natural resources, 1990, No. 2, pp. 89-96.
Laperdin V.K. On the dynamics of weathering products in the Baikal basin. – Geography and natural resources, 1993, No. 1, pp. 72-77.
Laperdin V.K. Modern landforms in the north-east of Tuva. – In: Abstracts of the reports of the Irkutsk geomorphological seminar, September 1995. Irkutsk, 1995, pp. 78-79.
Laperdin V.K., Trzhtsinsky Yu.B. Dating the manifestation of geological processes using dendrochronology methods. – In: Dendrochronology: Achievements and Prospects. All-Russian meeting (October 27-30, 2003, Krasnoyarsk). Meeting materials. Krasnoyarsk, 2003, p.5.
Laperdin V.K. Patterns of the development of exogenous geological processes in the zones of linear natural and technical systems in the south of Eastern Siberia. Abstract of diss. for the academic degree of doctor of geol.-mineral. Sciences. Irkutsk, 2003. 45 p. [FROM TO].
Trzhtsinsky Yu.B., Kozyreva E.A., Laperdin V.K. , Mazaeva O.A., Ovchinnikov G.I. Exogenous natural-anthropogenic catastrophic geological phenomena in Eastern Siberia. – In: Modern Geodynamics and Dangerous Natural Processes in Central Asia. Issue 1. Irkutsk, 2004, p.84-94.
Laperdin V.K. Features of the development of the coastal zone of the lake. Baikal in the areas of creation of natural and technical systems. – In: Problems of Nature Management (IG SB RAS). Irkutsk, 2004, pp. 33-39.
Trzhtsinsky Yu.B., Kozyreva E.A., Laperdin V.K., Zalutsky V.T., Popov O.Yu. Engineering-geological features of the Kazankan section of the BAM. – In: Sergeev Readings. 2004, No. 6, p. 438.
Laperdin V.K. Factors of the development of catastrophic phenomena on the rivers of the south of Eastern Siberia and their consequences. – In: Modern Geodynamics and Dangerous Natural Processes in Central Asia. Issue 2. Irkutsk, 2005, p.182-189.
Laperdin V.K. Assessment of natural and technogenic conditions for the occurrence of emergency hazards and risks in the southwestern tip of Lake Baikal. – In: Sergeev Readings. Issue 8. Proceedings of the annual session of the Scientific Council of the Russian Academy of Sciences on problems of geoecology, engineering geology and hydrogeology (March 23, 2006). M., GEOS, 2006, pp. 232-235.
Laperdin V.K., Trzhtsinsky Yu.B., Kozyreva E.A. Development and distribution of exogenous geological processes in the zones of linear natural and technical systems in the south of Eastern Siberia. – Geography. Studia et Dissertationes (Uniwersytet Slaski). Tom 28. Katowice, 2006, p.109-125.
Laperdin V.K. Analysis of the possibility of occurrence of natural risks and geoecological instability along the route of the oil pipeline in the section between the cities of Lensk – Olekminsk – Tynda. – Environmental protection in the oil and gas complex, 2006, No. 10, pp. 24-29.
Laperdin V.K. Predictive Assessment of the Development of Geological Hazards and Ecological Risks under the Conditions of Cryogenesis in the Zone of Linear Natural and Technical Systems in the South of Eastern Siberia. – Environmental protection in the oil and gas complex, 2007. No. 1. pp. 25-32.
Ovchinnikov GI, Laperdin VK, Snytko VA, Imetkhenov AB, Shchipek T., Vika S. Natural-anthropogenic geomorphogenesis of the coast of Lake Baikal. – Geography and natural resources, 2006, No. 2, p.58-63.
Laperdin V.K. Factors of debris flow origination in the south-west area of Lake Baikal (Russia). – Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment. Proceedings of the fourth International Conference. September 10-13, 2007, Chengdu, China. Rotterdam, Millpress, 2007, p.31-34.
Laperdin V.K. Factors of formation of mudflows in the south of Eastern Siberia. – In: Mudflows: catastrophes, risk, forecast, protection. Proceedings of the International Conference. Pyatigorsk. Russia, September 22-29, 2008 Pyatigorsk, Sevkavgiprovodhoz Institute, 2008, pp.162-165.
Laperdin V.K. The current state of mudflow hazard in the Southern Baikal region. – In: Exogenous processes in the geological environment. Assessment of natural hazards. Irkutsk-Sosnovets, IZK, 2008, pp. 9-17.
Laperdin V.K., Kachura R.A. Cryogenic hazards in the zones of linear natural and technical complexes in the south of Eastern Siberia. – Earth’s cryosphere. 2009, T. XIII, No. 2, pp. 27-34.
Kachura R.A., Kuklin A.S., Laperdin V.K., Timofeev N.V. Predictive Assessment of Geological Hazards and Environmental Risks at the Dulisma Hydrocarbon Field. – Environmental protection in the oil and gas complex, 2009, No. 7, pp. 29-34.
Kachura R.A., Kuklin A.S., Laperdin V.K., Timofeev N.V. Geological hazards and risks for oil and gas pipelines in the north of about. Sakhalin. – News of the Irkutsk State University. Series: Earth Sciences. 2009, v.2, no.1, p.59-74.
Kachura R.A., Kuklin A.S., Laperdin V.K., Timofeev N.V. Mudflow hazard in the southern Baikal region (on the example of the Sukhoi brook basin). – News of the Irkutsk State University. Series: Earth Sciences. 2009, No. 2, pp. 86-104.
Kachura R.A., Kuklin A.S., Laperdin V.K., Timofeev N.V. Geological hazards in the zone of development of the coast of Lake Baikal in the area Port Baikal – settlement. Kultuk. – Bulletin of the Irkutsk State Technical University. Earth Sciences. 2010, No. 3 (43), pp. 22-30.
Laperdin V.K., Kustov Yu.I., Kachura R.A. Factors of natural instability and man-made risks in the territory of the Arshan resort (basin of the Kyngarga river, Republic of Buryatia). – Environmental protection in the oil and gas complex, 2010, No. 4, pp. 37-45.
Laperdin V.K., Imaev V.S. Dangerous geological processes in the zone of the Baikal rift and adjacent territories. – Issues of engineering seismology, 2010, vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 40-55.
Laperdin V.K., Kachura R.A. Geodynamics of hazardous processes in the zones of natural-technogenic complexes of Eastern Siberia. Rep. ed. KG Levi [Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of the Earth’s Crust]. Irkutsk, IZK, 2010, 311 p.
Laperdin V.K., Imaev V.S., Verkhozin I.I., Kachura R.A., Imaeva L.P. Dangerous geological processes in the South of Yakutia and adjacent territories. / Rev. ed. R.M. Semenov. Irkutsk, [Sib. Department of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of the Earth’s Crust], 2011. 239 p.
Laperdin V.K., Kachura R.A., Timofeev N.V. Dangerous geological processes and the state of protection in the South-Western Baikal region. – In: Modern geodynamics of Central Asia and dangerous natural processes: research results on a quantitative basis. Materials of the All-Russian meeting and youth school on modern geodynamics. 2012, pp.104-107.
Laperdin V.K., Kachura R.A. Analysis of the occurrence of natural and technogenic risks and geoecological instability along the routes of oil and gas pipelines in the south of Yakutia. – Environmental protection in the oil and gas complex. 2012, No. 9, pp. 17-24.
Laperdin V.K., Yushkin V.I., Kachura R.A. Geoecological hazards from cryogenic deformations at gas station facilities in the south of Eastern Siberia. – Environmental protection in the oil and gas complex, 2012, No. 6, pp. 32-37.
Laperdin V.K., Kachura R.A. Synergy of natural and technogenic factors in the development and spread of hazardous geological processes in Northeast Asia. Rep. ed. K.G. Levy. Irkutsk, Institute of the Earth’s Crust Sib. Department of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2013, 111 p.
Laperdin V.K., Kachura R.A. Natural instability and geo-environmental risk along the route of the product pipeline (the area of Blagoveshchensk). – Environmental protection in the oil and gas complex, 2013, No. 8, p.18-22.
Laperdin V.K., Levi K.G., Lekhatinov A.M., Kadetova A.V., Pellinen V.A., Rybchenko A.A. Causes and consequences of catastrophic mudflows on June 28, 2014 in the vicinity of the village. Arshan, Republic of Buryatia. – Geodynamics & Tectonophysics, 2014, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 799-816.
Laperdin V.K., Kachura R.A. Substantiation of natural and technogenic features of the formation of geoecological risk at the installation site for the production of alpha-olefins. – Environmental protection in the oil and gas complex, 2014, No. 10, pp. 36-42.
Pellinen V.A., Laperdin V.K., Levi K.G., Rybchenko A.A. Mudflow hazard in the Southern Baikal region. – In: Structure of the lithosphere and geodynamics. Materials of the XXVI All-Russian Youth Conference. 2015, pp.137-139.
Laperdin V.K., Makarov S.A., Bardash A.V. Mudflow hazard of the Kyngarga river basin (Southern Baikal region). – In: Mudflows: catastrophes, risk, forecast, protection. Materials of the IV International Conference. Irkutsk, 2016, pp. 124-128.
Laperdin V.K. Mudflow and flood hazard in Eastern Siberia (on the example of Southern Baikal and Northern Transbaikalia). In: Mudflows: catastrophes, risk, forecast, protection. Materials of the IV International Conference. Irkutsk, 2016, pp. 111-124.
Laperdin V.K., Levy K.G., Imaev V.S., Molochny V.G. Dangerous geological processes in the South-Western Baikal region. Irkutsk, Institute of the Earth’s Crust Sib. Department of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2016, 199 p.
Laperdin V.K., Sankov V.A., Dobrynina A.A. Seismogeodynamics as a factor in the formation of mudflows on the southern slopes of the Kodar Ridge. In the collection: Modern geodynamics of Central Asia and dangerous natural processes: research results on a quantitative basis. Materials of the III All-Russian Conference and the II All-Russian Youth School on Modern Geodynamics. 2016, pp.235-237.
Laperdin V.K., Rybchenko A.A. Estimated parameters of mudflow-forming components of the natural environment in the south of the lake. Baikal. – Sustainable development of mountain territories, 2016, vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 52-58.
Laperdin V.K. Mudflow hazard in the Kodar-Leprindo section of the Baikal-Amur Mainline: causes, consequences, principles of protection. – Geoisk, 2016, No. 2, pp. 38-43.
Laperdin V.K. Avalanche danger of the main routes of Eastern Siberia. – In: Physics, chemistry and mechanics of snow. collection of reports of the III International Symposium. 2017, pp. 83-88.
Laperdin V.K. Ecological risk of pollution of Lake Baikal by waste from the Baikal Pulp and Paper Mill. – Georisk, 2018 (in press).
Saturday May 20th, 2017
1935-2017
The Presidium of the Mudflow Association regrets to announce that on January 26, 2017, the winner of the Fleishman medal, a member of the Mudflow Association, Razmik Ter-Minasyan, tragically died in a car accident.
R.O. Ter-Minasyan graduated from the Faculty of Geography of the Yerevan State University. university at 1960 years old. Worked at “Armhydromet”, Yerevan State University, “Armgiprozem”, “Armgiprovodhoz”, Department of Natural Disasters of the Department of Emergency Situations under the Government of the Republic of Armenia, Institute of Water Problems and Hydraulic Engineering named after. I.V. Yeghiazarov, Yerevan State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering.
In 1975 he became a candidate of geographical sciences, defended his thesis on the topic “Geomorphological and hydrological analysis of solid mudflow runoff (on the example of the basins of the Vedi and Pambak rivers of the Armenian SSR)”. Author of 51 publications, including one invention.
Completed the hydrological substantiation of the “Mudflow Prevention Measures” section of the General Scheme for the Rational Use and Protection of Water Resources of the Armenian SSR. Supervised the scientific topic “Natural studies of liquid and solid mudflow runoff.” Developed a hydrological substantiation of mudflows in the Prierevan region. Performed hydrological substantiation: 21 reservoirs, 16 small hydroelectric power stations, numerous mudflow protection and reclamation facilities in Armenia, Nagorno-Karabakh and Russia. Developed methods for assessing the mudflow hazard and the risk of mudflows and floods, a hydrological method for predicting earthquakes (author’s certificate No. 277), the section “Anti-mudflow measures” of the scheme for the protection and rational use of natural resources in the Lake Sevan basin. He was a member of the Geographical Society of Armenia, the scientific and technical council of “Armhydromet”, the association of Armenian hydrologists, the interregional public organization “Mudflow Association”, the scientific council of the ArmNII VPiG named after. I.V. Yeghiazarov, collegiate leadership on hydrometeorology and monitoring of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Armenia.
We offer our deepest condolences to the family and friends of Razmik Ter-Minasyan.
Presidium of the Mudflow Association
List of works by R.O. Ter-Minasyan in the field of mudflow science
Ter-Minasyan R.O., Torosyan Z.N. Granulometry of channel sediments in the Vedi River basin. – In: Mudflows and Mountain Channel Processes. Yerevan, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the ArmSSR, 1968, pp. 153-159.
Ter-Minasyan R.O. Intraflood course of changes in turbidity of mudflow-bearing tributaries of the Vedi River. – In: Erosion and mudflow processes and their control. Issue 1. M., 1972, pp. 174-178.
Ter-Minasyan R.O. On the turbidity of the mud-bearing tributaries of the Vedi River. – “Young Scientific Worker” (YSU), natural sciences, 1972, No. 2(16), pp.56-60.
Ter-Minasyan R., Torosyan Z. Catastrophic mudflows. – “Science and Technology” (Yerevan), 1972, No. 6, p.37-40.
Ter-Minasyan R.O. Consumption of suspended sediments of mudflow tributaries of the Vedi and Pambak rivers and its relationship with natural factors. – “News of the Academy of Sciences of the ArmSSR”, ser. “Earth Sciences”, 1973, No. 3, pp.63-69.
Ter-Minasyan R.O. Coefficient of heterogeneity of channel mudflow deposits. – “Young Researcher” (YSU), natural sciences, 1973, No. 2(18), pp. 214-218.
Ter-Minasyan R.O. Mudflow flood in the basin of the Pambak-Debed river and determination of the volume of mudflow deposits. – In: Erosion and mudflow processes and their control. Issue 2. M., 1973, pp. 130-134.
Ter-Minasyan R.O. Methodology for constructing granulometric curves of mudflow deposits for unexplored watercourses. – Abstracts of the reports of the All-Union Conference “State and ways of development of scientific research on the mudflow problem and the design of anti-mudflow structures”. Tbilisi, 15-17 October 1974 M., TsBNTI, 1974, p.54-55.
Ter-Minasyan R.O. Typification of granulometric curves of channel mudflow deposits (on the example of tributaries of the Vedi and Pambak rivers). – “YSU Scientific Notes”, natural sciences, 1974, No. 2(126), pp.104-109
Ter-Minasyan R.O. Influence of the erosive capacity of river basins on the weighted average diameter of debris flows. – “News of the Academy of Sciences of the ArmSSR”, series “Earth Sciences”, 1974, No. 6, pp. 44-49.
Ter-Minasyan R.O. Geomorphological and hydrological analysis of solid mudflow runoff (on the example of the basins of the Vedi and Pambak rivers of the Armenian SSR). Abstract of diss. for the academic degree cand. geogr. Sciences. Yerevan, 1975. 23 p. (Yerevan State University).
Ter-Minasyan R.O. Determination of the granulometric composition of mudflow deposits for unexplored watercourses. – In: Materials of the scientific and technical conference of young scientists and specialists of the Ministry of Water Resources of the Armenian SSR, dedicated to the XVII Congress of the Komsomol and the 50th anniversary of the assignment of the VLKSM named after V.I. Lenin. Yerevan, “Hayastan”, 1977, pp. 217-225.
Ter-Minasyan R.O. Determination of the volume of mudflow deposits on the alluvial cone. – XV All-Union scientific and technical conference on anti-mudflow measures (Tashkent, 27-29September 1978). Abstracts of reports. Issue 2. M., TsBNTI of the Ministry of Water Resources of the USSR, 1978, pp. 72-74.
Kazaryan N.E., Ter-Minasyan R.O., Torosyan Z.N. The value of the coefficient of mudflow runoff of the rivers of the Armenian SSR. – In: Erosion and mudflow processes and their control. Issue 6. Tbilisi, 1978, pp. 61-65.
Ter-Minasyan R.O. Main parameters of mudflows in the Lake Sevan basin. – In: Erosion and Mudflow Phenomena of the Sevan Basin. Questions of geography. Interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Issue 1-2. Yerevan, YSU Publishing House, 1984, pp. 175-180, 182-183.
Agaparyan E.M., Ter-Minasyan R.O. Assessment and forecast of mudflow hazard. – “Bulletin of MANEB”, 1999, No. 5 (17), p.20-22.
Ter-Minasyan R. Mudflow forecasting. – In: International Seminar “Armenia’s Conversion Potential and ISTC Programmes”. Abstracts. October 2-7, 2000 Yerevan, 2000, p.205.
Ter-Minasyan R. The activity of water disasters in the territory of the Republic of Armenia under the conditions of climate change. – In collection: Armenia. Problems of climate change. Digest of articles. II edition. Yerevan, 2003, pp. 277-283.
Ter-Minasian R.O. The assessment of mudflow flood occurrence risks. – Asian Seismological Commission. V General Assembly. 18-21 October 2004. Yerevan, Armenia. Yerevan, 2004, p.315.
Ter-Minasyan R.O., Karamyan A.O. Disaster risk assessment. – In: Applied Issues of Geography and Geology of the Mountain Regions of the Alpine-Himalayan Belt. Materials of the conference dedicated to the 90th anniversary of Professor S.P. Balyan. Yerevan, April 25-28, 2007. Yerevan, YSU Publishing House, 2007, pp.282-284.
Ter-Minasyan R.O. Forecasting the risk of mudflows in Armenia. – In: Mudflows: catastrophes, risk, forecast, protection. Proceedings of the International Conference. Pyatigorsk. Russia, September 22-29, 2008 Pyatigorsk, Institute “Sevkavgiprovodhoz”, 2008, pp.78-80.
Ter-Minasyan R.O., Karamyan A.O., Ghazaryan G.G. Mudflow danger in the Yerevan region. – Izvestiya NAS RA, ser. “Earth Sciences”, 2009, Volume 62, No. 1, pp.57-59.
Torosyan Z.N., Ter-Minasyan R.O., Baljyan P.O. On the Method for Determining the Coefficient of Storm Runoff of Selenium-bearing Rivers of the Republic of Armenia.
Continue Reading
Previous: Stx stallion sc ti review. STX Surgeon Sc-Ti Attack Shaft: A Comprehensive Review of the Elite Lacrosse Stick
Next: Clayton Greyhounds Hockey: Revolutionizing Fan Experience with Mobile App