How can you access NCAA rule books. Where to find free digital versions of NCAA manuals. Why are print copies no longer available. What updates are included in the latest NCAA manuals. How do NCAA rules impact college athletics.
Accessing NCAA Rule Books: Digital Options and Resources
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has made significant changes to how it distributes its rule books, also known as NCAA manuals. In response to evolving technology and the need for more efficient distribution, the NCAA has shifted away from printed copies and embraced digital formats.
Are print copies of NCAA manuals still available. The short answer is no. The NCAA has discontinued the production of physical hard copies for all its divisional manuals. This move towards digital-only distribution reflects broader trends in publishing and allows for more frequent updates and easier access for stakeholders.
Digital Access Options
- Free PDF downloads directly from the NCAA website
- EPUB and MOBI formats for e-readers
- Access through the LSDBi (Legislative Services Database for the Internet) system
How can you download NCAA manuals. The process is straightforward:
- Visit the official NCAA website (www.NCAA.org)
- Navigate to the Publications section
- Select the desired manual (Division I, II, or III)
- Choose your preferred format (PDF, EPUB, or MOBI)
- Download the file to your device
For those requiring the most up-to-date information, the LSDBi system (https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/) provides real-time access to the latest updates across all NCAA manuals. This online platform ensures that users always have the most current rules and regulations at their fingertips.
Understanding the Structure of NCAA Manuals
NCAA manuals are comprehensive documents that outline the rules, regulations, and guidelines governing collegiate athletics. They cover a wide range of topics, from eligibility requirements to recruiting practices and competition rules.
How are NCAA manuals organized. The manuals are typically structured into several key sections:
- Constitution: Fundamental principles and purposes of the NCAA
- Operating Bylaws: Detailed rules for membership, eligibility, recruiting, and more
- Administrative Bylaws: Procedures for NCAA governance and enforcement
- Appendices: Supplementary information and guidelines
Each division (I, II, and III) has its own manual, reflecting the unique needs and characteristics of institutions competing at different levels. This division-specific approach allows for tailored regulations that better serve the diverse landscape of collegiate athletics.
The Importance of Regular Updates to NCAA Rule Books
The NCAA’s shift to digital distribution isn’t just about convenience—it’s also about ensuring that all stakeholders have access to the most current information. College athletics is a dynamic field, with rules and regulations constantly evolving to address new challenges and opportunities.
Why are frequent updates to NCAA manuals necessary. There are several key reasons:
- Adapting to changing landscapes in collegiate sports
- Addressing emerging issues in athlete welfare and safety
- Responding to technological advancements affecting recruitment and competition
- Ensuring fair competition across diverse institutions
The digital format allows the NCAA to implement changes more rapidly and efficiently. For example, the 2017 edition of the manual incorporated legislative actions from the 111th annual NCAA Convention held in January of that year. This quick turnaround ensures that member institutions can stay compliant with the latest rules and regulations.
Navigating the Complexities of NCAA Rules and Compliance
Understanding and adhering to NCAA rules is a complex task for athletic departments, coaches, and athletes alike. The manuals serve as the primary source of information, but interpreting and applying these rules in real-world situations often requires additional guidance and expertise.
How do institutions ensure compliance with NCAA rules. Many colleges and universities employ dedicated compliance officers who specialize in interpreting NCAA regulations and guiding their institution’s athletic programs. These professionals play a crucial role in:
- Educating coaches, staff, and athletes on current rules
- Monitoring recruiting activities and athlete eligibility
- Conducting internal audits to identify potential violations
- Liaising with NCAA officials on compliance matters
Despite these efforts, the complexity of NCAA rules can sometimes lead to unintentional violations or misinterpretations. The NCAA’s enforcement process is designed to investigate and address potential rule breaches, with penalties ranging from fines and scholarship reductions to postseason bans in severe cases.
The Role of Technology in NCAA Rule Enforcement
As collegiate athletics becomes increasingly intertwined with technology, the NCAA has had to adapt its rulebook and enforcement strategies. Digital platforms now play a significant role in areas such as recruiting, athlete monitoring, and even game analysis.
How has technology impacted NCAA rule enforcement. Several key areas have seen significant changes:
- Social media monitoring for recruiting violations
- Use of data analytics to track athlete performance and eligibility
- Implementation of video review systems in officiating
- Development of online education modules for compliance training
The LSDBi system itself is a testament to the NCAA’s embrace of technology. By providing real-time access to rules and interpretations, it helps institutions stay informed and compliant in an ever-changing regulatory environment.
Controversies and Criticisms Surrounding NCAA Rules
While the NCAA rule books aim to promote fair competition and protect the integrity of collegiate athletics, they are not without controversy. Critics argue that some regulations are outdated, overly complex, or fail to address the real issues facing college sports today.
What are some of the main criticisms of NCAA rules. Several key issues have been at the forefront of debates:
- Amateurism and athlete compensation
- Transfer regulations and athlete mobility
- Academic eligibility standards
- Enforcement inconsistencies across different institutions
The story shared about an athletic director supporting stringent reforms while privately admitting to disregarding them highlights a persistent challenge in NCAA governance. It underscores the gap that can exist between rule-making and rule-following, raising questions about the effectiveness of the current regulatory framework.
How does the NCAA address these criticisms. The organization has shown a willingness to evolve, as evidenced by recent changes to name, image, and likeness (NIL) rules allowing athletes to profit from their personal brand. However, many argue that more fundamental reforms are necessary to address the underlying issues in collegiate athletics.
The Future of NCAA Rule Books and Governance
As college athletics continues to evolve, so too must the NCAA’s approach to rule-making and enforcement. The shift to digital distribution of manuals is just one step in a broader modernization process that is likely to continue in the coming years.
What changes might we see in future NCAA rule books. Several trends and possibilities are worth considering:
- Increased use of artificial intelligence in compliance monitoring
- More frequent rule updates to keep pace with rapid changes in the sports landscape
- Greater emphasis on athlete welfare and mental health regulations
- Potential restructuring of divisional systems to better reflect competitive realities
The challenge for the NCAA will be to balance the need for comprehensive regulations with the desire for simplicity and clarity. As the organization navigates these complex issues, stakeholders across the collegiate athletics ecosystem will need to remain engaged and adaptable.
Leveraging NCAA Rule Books for Strategic Advantage
While the primary purpose of NCAA rule books is to ensure fair competition and maintain the integrity of college sports, savvy athletic departments and coaches often seek to leverage their deep understanding of these regulations for strategic advantage.
How can institutions use NCAA rules to their benefit. Several approaches have emerged:
- Identifying and exploiting rule “loopholes” for competitive edge
- Strategically timing appeals and waiver requests
- Developing innovative recruiting strategies within rule boundaries
- Crafting academic programs that maximize athlete eligibility
This approach to NCAA rules, sometimes referred to as “rule entrepreneurship,” highlights the complex interplay between regulation and competition in college athletics. While not inherently unethical, it underscores the need for ongoing review and refinement of NCAA policies to ensure they achieve their intended purposes.
The anecdote about the athletic director who supported stringent reforms while privately admitting to disregarding them illustrates a cynical but not uncommon approach to NCAA governance. It raises important questions about the effectiveness of self-regulation in college sports and the challenges of enforcing rules across a diverse landscape of institutions with varying resources and priorities.
As the NCAA continues to evolve its rulebook and enforcement strategies, finding ways to incentivize genuine compliance and discourage rule manipulation will be crucial. This may involve rethinking the structure of penalties, increasing transparency in the enforcement process, or developing more sophisticated monitoring technologies.
Ultimately, the future of NCAA rule books will likely involve a delicate balance between maintaining comprehensive regulations and fostering an environment where the spirit of the rules, not just the letter, is respected and upheld by all participants in collegiate athletics.
|
Print copies will not be available. You can download the free pdf of the Manual, above, OR on LSDBi (https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/) Use the Reports tab to access all three NCAA Divisional Manuals. | |
|
Print copies will not be available. You can download the free pdf of the Manual, above, OR on LSDBi (https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/) Use the Reports tab to access all three NCAA Divisional Manuals. | |
|
Print copies will not be available. You can download the free pdf of the Manual, above, OR on LSDBi (https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/) Use the Reports tab to access all three NCAA Divisional Manuals. 
| |
|
Print copies will not be available. You can download the free pdf of the Manual, above, OR on LSDBi (https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/) Use the Reports tab to access all three NCAA Divisional Manuals. | |
|
Print copies will not be available. You can download the free pdf of the Manual, above, OR on LSDBi (https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/) Use the Reports tab to access all three NCAA Divisional Manuals. | |
|
Print copies will not be available. You can download the free pdf of the Manual, above, OR on LSDBi (https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/) Use the Reports tab to access all three NCAA Divisional Manuals. 
| |
|
You can download the free pdf, epub or mobi of the Manual, above, OR go to www.NCAA.org, LSDBi (https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/) to log in and see the most current updates and all of the NCAA Manuals. | |
|
You can download the free pdf, epub or mobi of the Manual, above, OR go to www.NCAA.org, LSDBi (https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/) to log in and see the most current updates and all of the NCAA Manuals. | |
|
You can download the free pdf, epub or mobi of the Manual, above, OR go to www.NCAA.org, LSDBi (https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/) to log in and see the most current updates and all of the NCAA Manuals. 
| |
|
All physical hard copies of the NCAA Division I Manual are sold out. You can download the free pdf, epub or mobi of the Division I Manual, above, OR go to www.NCAA.org, LSDBi (https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/) to log in and see the most current updates and all of the NCAA Manuals.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
This publication incorporates the final legislative actions of the 111th annual NCAA Convention, January 18-21, 2017.
| |
|
This publication incorporates the final legislative actions of the 111th annual NCAA Convention, January 18-21, 2017.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NCAA RULE BOOK WAS MADE TO BE BROKEN
ALL this gnashing of teeth about the NCAA going out of its way to do dirt to St.
John’s brings to mind a story that a Division I athletic director tells in private and swears is true:
A few years back this AD attended an NCAA convention that was designed to probe significant reforms as they related to achieving a greater degree of academic and social integrity.
To this AD’s astonishment, one of the most out-front voices in the room belonged to the AD representing a school that was notorious for a corrupt basketball program, a program that would recruit functional illiterates, felons and 24-year-old freshmen from Krasnoyarsk as long as they sustained the school’s presence on national TV and in the NCAA Tournament.
The most stringent proposals had this AD’s support. “He even supported a roll-call vote instead of a secret ballot,” said our confidant. “He didn’t want anyone to hide.”
Hours later, in the hotel bar, our story-teller ran into the reform-minded AD. “We had a few drinks and chatted, until I finally asked him how a school with such a horrible reputation could be so supportive of reform.
“He leaned over and whispered, ‘Votin’ for rules and observin’ ’em are two different things.’”
Kowabonga! Not only didn’t this AD intend to follow the new rules, his program would benefit competitively from schools that would.
That’s what people seem to forget or dismiss about the NCAA as it “goes after” and “has it in for” St. John’s, or any other school that would have its fans believe that it’s the victim of malicious NCAA prosecution.
Behind every rule that’s ridiculed as petty and mean-spirited stands any combination of an AD, coach, booster, summer league AAU coach, sneaker company rep, agent and college president who’s eager to pervert a pre-existing rule.
That the NCAA rule book is the size of the Tokyo phone book was not someone’s idea of rainy-day busy work. It’s a response to the ever-escalating sickness that is big-time collegiate sports. Every rule drives the subversion of that rule, which then drives another rule.
It began the day the first scholarship was granted in order to best beat State U.
It gathers steam when a school first decides to construct a 15,000-seat gym or a 60,000-seat football field. You pay for them by filling them, and you don’t fill them by going 5-23 or 2-9. In for a penny, in for a pound. You’ve got to win, by hook or by crook.
NCAA rules that have been widely condemned as absurd and heartless as they relate to “the kids” are not inspired by heartlessness toward kids, but by the corruption of adults who recruit these kids to be in their care.
Former LSU basketball coach Dale Brown and ex-North Carolina State basketball coach Jim Valvano would bash the NCAA for rules that disallowed the school from paying for airline tickets “so that poor kids can get home for the holidays or to attend their grandmother’s funeral.”
The media would eat this up, piling on the NCAA as an unrepentant Scrooge beyond Dickens’ first draft. But the fact of the matter is that the NCAA fully knows that adults can’t be trusted with appropriating anything of value to student-athletes.
Moreover, how is it that Brown and Valvano recruited kids who they knew were too poor to make it home? These kids couldn’t attend a school closer to home? Of course they could. But if they didn’t recruit poor kids from 2,000 miles away, somebody else — everybody else — would.
Consider that the overwhelming majority of Division I basketball and football coaches who have bonus clauses are rewarded with far more money for reaching the postseason than for running a clean academic and social program. It’s a formula that encourages corruption.
Consider that college presidents exist primarily as fund-raisers. The winningest big-time sports programs bring the biggest donations, as well as the most TV money (shame on these alumni and TV execs). So which would the president choose: A starting five that graduates but doesn’t make the NCAA Tournament? Or a starting five that doesn’t graduate but makes the Final Four?
For crying out loud, schools hire NCAA investigators to serve their athletic departments as loophole specialists.
The NCAA has taken a pounding for disallowing scholarship athletes from holding jobs. “The brutes! What’s wrong with a kid earning a little pocket change by holding an after-school job down at The Malt Shoppe?”
In Chip Hilton books and Norman Rockwell prints, nothing. But the NCAA knew damned well that legions of student-athletes were landing no-show jobs, while others were employed by local car dealerships to test-drive new models around campus.
The recurring portrayal of student-athletes from poor stock existing as the have-nots on campus is mostly a con. They’re more likely to be the “haves,” in the extreme. And the notion that they don’t have pocket money to buy their best gal a burger on a Saturday night is antiquated.
If it were about pocket change, there wouldn’t be any problems. The real scandal arises when, after a free ride to college that doesn’t end with a pro sports career, the student-athlete lacks the education or social skills to earn a living that will always put food on his and his family’s table.
And that’s not the NCAA’s fault.
Every NCAA investigation that’s deemed unfair by the naive or the pom- pom shakers leads to calls to pay the athletes. They are paid. In addition to federal cash grants, they can receive, at no cost, what most Americans can’t pay for out of pocket: A college education, housing, meals, tutors and books. And they’re given six years to graduate.
The value of such a deal based on a mid-cost, private, non-commuter college education over six years is roughly $160,000.
If non-athlete students were given such a deal, their graduation rate would be 99 percent, not 65, or 50, or 15 percent. And school administrators who favorably compare graduation rates of their scholarship athletes to the school’s general population are either disingenuous or ignorant.
And how would paying the athletes better inspire any one of them to open a book? As it is, celebrated institutions of higher learning — Auburn, of late, in the James Brooks case — matriculate illiterates in the name of winning ballgames, keeping the stadium filled, TV money and TV exposure.
Will legalized cash handouts create a sudden run on the library among student-athletes, or will it exacerbate the abandonment of the colleges’ sacred charters, charters that vow to serve the academic and social growth of those who enter its hallowed halls?
It’s easy to rip the NCAA and its hypocrisies in view of its billion-dollar TV deals. But, given that virtually every Division I school already emits smoke, one thing about the NCAA’s investigative arm remains true: When the NCAA “goes after” a school, it’s a good bet that there’s a fire.
NCAA comes down on Cal Poly for books violation
The NCAA has placed Cal Poly on two years of probation and will force the school to vacate regular season and conference tournament records in “most of its sports programs” after an investigation concluded the school did not properly monitor its book scholarship program.
In a 21-page report released Thursday, the NCAA said Cal Poly provided cash stipends of $800, intended for books and academic supplies, to 265 student-athletes between 2012 and 2015 that did not equal the cost of the items.
The investigation determined these cash stipends resulted in 30 student-athletes exceeding their financial aid limits by an average of $174.57.
“Several student-athletes used the book stipend to pay for items that were not related to required books or supplies such as food, rent, utilities and car repairs,” the report said. “On an individual basis, for those student-athletes who received cash that exceeded the cost of books and supplies, the value of the overages ranged from $5 to $734 and totaled $16,180.”
Cal Poly became aware its process for distributing the book stipends did not follow NCAA rules at a Big West Conference financial aid summit in October 2015, which led the school to hire an outside agency to review its financial aid practices and eventually self-report the error to NCAA enforcement staff.
“Cal Poly promotes an atmosphere of compliance, and has in place strong monitoring and educational practices,” Don Oberhelman, the school’s athletic director, said in a statement.
“This high level of commitment is what led to the discovery of the error. It was an inadvertent error that was isolated in the area of textbooks and, in every case of any actual overaward, there was no advantage gained.”
In a news release, the NCAA said Cal Poly mistakenly treated the book stipends “in the same manner as room and board stipends,” and that the organization will require the school to vacate all regular season and conference tournament records and participation in which ineligible student-athletes competed. If any student-athletes deemed ineligible competed in the postseason, Cal Poly’s participation in the postseason will also be vacated.
It’s unclear how many wins and postseason appearances will be wiped from the record books.
“We don’t believe the university broke this longstanding rule intentionally but we do recognize there is no ambiguity in the wording of the rule and there is no room for misinterpretation,” said Big East deputy commissioner Vince Nicastro, who served as the chief hearing officer for the panel that issued the punishment.
“Cal Poly simply failed to follow the rule.”
Additionally, any school that hires any of the coaches whose teams were affected will be barred from making references to those coaches’ vacated accomplishments in official publications.
“Head coaches with vacated wins on their records may not count the vacated wins toward specific honors or victory ‘milestones’ such as 100th, 200th or 500th career victories,” the report said. “Any public reference to the vacated contests shall be removed from the athletics department stationary, banners displayed in public areas and any other forum in which they may appear.”
The school will be required to inform potential student-athletes prior to official recruiting visits about the infractions outlined in the report. Additional penalties include a “public reprimand and censure” and a self-imposed fine of $5,000.
As part of its justification for the imposed penalties, the NCAA report cited Cal Poly infractions cases from 1987 and 1995.
Cal Poly fields 20 NCAA-affiliated teams and primarily competes in the Big West and Mountain Pacific Sports Federation. Its football program plays in the Big Sky Conference, as part of the Football Championship Subdivision.
What is targeting?
655 days ago
WHAT IS TARGETING?
” ‘Targeting’ means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball.”
The targeting rule was developed as a player safety measure. Below is the definition of targeting taken directly from the 2019 NCAA Football Rule Book. Familiarize yourself with this rule and refer to it the next time you see a play and ask, “Was that targeting?”
Targeting – NCAA Rule Book 2019
Rule 9 – Conduct of Players and Others Subject to the Rules
Section 1. Personal Fouls
Targeting and Making Forcible Contact With the Crown of the Helmet
ARTICLE 3.
No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown of his helmet. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul. (Rule 9-6) (A.R. 9-1-3-I)
Targeting and Making Forcible Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player
ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI)
Note 1: “Targeting” means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to:
- Launch-a player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area
- A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
- Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
- Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet
Note 2: Defenseless player (Rule 2-27-14).
When in question, a player is defenseless. Examples of defenseless players include but are not limited to:
- A player in the act of or just after throwing a pass.
- A receiver attempting to catch a forward pass or in position to receive a backward pass, or one who has completed a catch and has not had time to protect himself or has not clearly become a ball carrier.
- A kicker in the act of or just after kicking a ball, or during the kick or the return.
- A kick returner attempting to catch or recover a kick, or one who has completed a catch or recovery and has not had time to protect himself or has not clearly become a ball carrier.
- A player on the ground.
- A player obviously out of the play.
- A player who receives a blind-side block.
- A ball carrier already in the grasp of an opponent and whose forward progress has been stopped.
- A quarterback any time after a change of possession A ball carrier who has obviously given himself up and is sliding feetfirst.
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13468093/usa_today_11729554.jpg)
PENALTY- [ARTICLE 3 and ARTICLE 4]-15 yards. For dead-ball fouls, 15 yards from the succeeding spot. Automatic first down for fouls by Team B if not in conflict with other rules. For fouls in the first half: Disqualification for the remainder of the game. (Rule 2-27-12) For fouls in the second half: Disqualification for the remainder of the game and the first half of the next game. If the foul occurs in the second half of the last game of the season, players with remaining eligibility shall serve the suspension during the postseason or the first game of the following season.
If a player receives a third Targeting foul within the same season, disqualification for the remainder of the game and that player will receive an automatic one-game suspension in his team’s next scheduled game. Targeting fouls subsequent to the player’s third Targeting foul within the same season, disqualification for the remainder of that game and the player will receive an automatic one-game suspension in his team’s next scheduled game.
If the foul occurs in the last game of the season, players with remaining eligibility shall serve the suspension during the postseason or the first game of the following season.
The disqualification must be reviewed by Instant Replay (Rule 12-3-5). [S38, S24 and S47]
When the Instant Replay Official reverses the disqualification: If the targeting foul is not in conjunction with another personal foul by the same player, the 15-yard penalty for targeting is not enforced. If the player commits another personal foul in conjunction with the targeting foul, the 15-yard penalty for that personal foul is enforced according to rule. (A. R. 9-1-4-VII-VIII)
For games in which Instant Replay is not used: If a player is disqualified in the first half, at the option of the conference or by pre-game mutual agreement of the teams in inter-conference games, during the intermission between halves the Referee will be provided a video of the play in question for his review in the officials’ private secure location.
The Referee will review the video to determine whether the disqualification is reversed. The decision of the Referee is final. (A. R. 9-1-4-IX)
Note: The video source and the location of the review will be determined prior to the game through mutual agreement of the teams and the Referee. If a player is disqualified in the second half, the conference has the option to consult the national coordinator of football officials who would then facilitate a video review. Based on the review, if and only if the national coordinator concludes that the player should not have been disqualified, the conference may vacate the suspension. If the national coordinator supports the disqualification, the suspension for the next game will remain.
Why the NCAA Is Allowing Athletes to Make Money
How much are players going to be making?
A few select stars, particularly in football and basketball, could make millions. But many more college athletes, including plenty in those same sports, could likely generate thousands or tens of thousands of dollars in earnings.
Some won’t make any money. The laws and N.C.A.A. rules do not guarantee any deals; they just make them possible.
Luis Pardillo, the chief executive of Dreamfield, a company that will work with student-athletes to market personal appearances, said he knew of players planning rates of up to $2,000 an hour. But he and other executives anticipate that fees will shift as the marketplace evolves, with some athletes commanding even higher sums and others being prompted to cut prices.
It’s 2021. Why has this taken so long?
Take your pick of explanations. A crucial one is that, for reasons as much financial and legal as philosophical, it took a lot of college sports leaders a long time to warm up to the idea that students should be allowed to earn more than what it costs to attend school.
And although California passed a law in 2019 to allow players to profit off their fame (it has not yet taken effect) and pushed the N.C.A.A. toward changes, the N.C.A.A. is hardly designed for speedy action.
The coronavirus pandemic, which sent the finances of the N.C.A.A. and college athletic departments nationwide into crisis, did not help the timetable.
The N.C.A.A. was prepared in January to vote on new rules, but the Justice Department, in the waning days of the Trump administration, raised antitrust concerns, prompting the association, at Emmert’s urging, to postpone action.
It was not until an interview with The New York Times on May 7 that Emmert publicly said the N.C.A.A. should again move ahead on approving new rules.
“We need to get a vote on these rules that are in front of the members now,” Emmert said as he urged a vote “before, or as close to, July 1.”
Know your college basketball rule changes for 2016-17
Every year, the NCAA Men’s Basketball Rules Committee meets and suggests changes to the rule book, as well as “interpretations” and “points of emphasis.” What do these mean, and what are the relevant changes for the 2016-17 season?
The NCAA issued a helpful video about changes for the coming season, which you can view below, and I’ll have some commentary about the changes as well.
A minor tweak to the “live ball timeouts” rule
Last year, the Rules Committee changed the rules regarding timeouts, forbidding coaches from calling a timeout during a live-ball situation. This meant that, while the ball is in play, only the players on the floor could call a timeout.
The NCAA slightly tweaked that rule for 2016-17, allowing coaches to call a timeout during an inbounds play. Last year, once the officials began the five-second count, a coach could not call a timeout. For the coming year, coaches still can’t call a timeout once the ball is inbounded, but they can now call a timeout while the ball is out of bounds. This means that a coach can call a timeout if his team is about to incur a five-second violation.
It’s a minor change, but now coaches don’t have to depend on their players to avoid getting a five-second call.
Interpretation of the “restricted arc” rule for players attempting to block a shot
The Rules Committee also issued an “interpretation” regarding the restricted area inside the lane.
The committee is clarifying that a secondary defender in the restricted area will be allowed to jump straight up to block a shot. In this specific case, the restricted-area rule is not in effect, and the play should be officiated as any other basketball play.
An “interpretation” means that the committee is clarifying a previous rule that might not have been clear. In this instance, the interpretation concerns the restricted arc. Under the previous rules, a defender inside the restricted arc could not take a charge and any contact with an offensive player would result in a blocking foul being called.
Now, so long as the defender maintains verticality (meaning he jumps straight up and holds his arms straight up in an attempt to block a shot), that defender will not be called for a blocking foul even if he is inside the restricted area. This interpretation effectively prevents an offensive player from picking up a cheap foul by leaning into a shot blocker who leapt from inside the restricted arc.
But a defender who remains grounded is still subject to the rules concerning the restricted arc. So, too, is a defender who leaps out toward an offensive player, or who extends his arms parallel to the floor (Note: if you’re a stickler for the rulebook, this kind of play is also a blocking foul if the defender is outside the restricted arc).
The “vertical cylinder”
Another rule interpretation concerns the “vertical cylinder,” or in layman’s terms a player’s personal space. So long as an offensive player’s forearms are more vertical than horizontal, he can freely move the ball from one side of his body to the other, and if a defender makes contact with him it’s a defensive foul so long as the offensive player’s contact is not excessive and unnecessary.
In recent years, defensive players had been (usually at the instruction of their coaches) been drawing cheap flagrant fouls by getting in an offensive player’s grill and drawing contact with the offensive player’s elbow when he tried to move (usually, there was an egregious flop in there.
) Now, so long as the offensive player doesn’t make excessive contact — meaning, basically, so long as he doesn’t purposely knock the defender in the jaw with his elbow — and he’s making a normal basketball play, such contact is a defensive foul. However, if the offensive player’s forearms are horizontal to the ground and there’s contact, it’s an offensive foul. This rule also goes the other way, as well, and prohibits an offensive player from invading the vertical cylinder of a defender who’s in proper position.
“Points of emphasis” on physical play and traveling
What are points of emphasis? They’re not really rule changes, but directives to enforce the rules that are already on the books. This year, the NCAA has issued points of emphasis regarding physicality on post play and rebounding, as well as “freedom of movement” regarding contact with cutters and illegal screens.
Weren’t these points of emphasis last year? Well, yes, and they still are. Think of it like a highway, where the speed limit is 65 miles per hour.
But let’s say that the average driver is going 75 mph, and the local police department has gotten into the habit of only ticketing people who are going 80, even though going 75 (or even 70) is also against the law. So the police chief, or the NCAA in this case, issues a directive to his officers to start writing tickets for people going 70-75 mph.
What happens is that either drivers will adjust their behavior in reaction to increased enforcement — or they don’t, and traffic cops are left with the unappealing options of either writing a ton of speeding tickets or just going back to their old habits of only ticketing the most egregious offenders and letting the minor violations slide. It turns out that while a lot of fans and coaches didn’t like all the physical play in the game, they didn’t exactly like ballgames turning into foul-shooting contests with players getting disqualified left and right, either.
And if you watched the SEC last year, a frequent complaint was that the officiating just varied so much from game to game that it became annoyingly impossible to figure out how the game was going to be officiated on a nightly basis.
One night, the refs would be the rough equivalent of cops ticketing people for going 66 in a 65; the next night, anything short of murder would be met with a shrug and a “let ‘em play.” The simplest fix to officiating in the game would be consistency.
A final point of emphasis has to do with traveling; all too often, players “reset” their feet when catching the ball without dribbling, and since this does create an advantage for the offense officials are instructed to call a travel.
NCAA Baseball Rules in Black and White
Description
NCAA Baseball Rules in Black and White: 2019 – 2020 has been updated to include the most recent rules changes from the NCAA Baseball 2019 and 2020 Rules and Interpretations guide. It clarifies, explains, and gives examples for all of the most common, difficult, or misinterpreted calls in the game.
NCAA Baseball Rules in Black and White: 2019 – 2020 features
- Collected and organized related rulings placed under a definitive chapter.
- Confusing official rule book grammar converted into an easy-to-read and easy-to-retain format.
- Explanations complementary to the NCAA Baseball 2019 and 2020 Rules and Interpretations.
- Official NCAA rule and page numbers for ease of reference.
Being an umpire requires many skills, talents, and knowledge. A good umpire must have excellent tracking, a consistent strike zone, exceptional timing, and the ability to execute proper field mechanics. Most important, though, an umpire must have a solid knowledge of the rules of baseball!
Having a proficient level of rules knowledge empowers umpires to have greater confidence and accuracy when making split-second calls. This in turn improves their ability to effectively explain rule interpretations and establish superior game management skills. Rules knowledge is vital to becoming a respected umpire.
An effective baseball rules resource should take a reader directly to a rule, use straightforward language to convey a clear and decisive interpretation, and retain accuracy.
NCAA Baseball Rules in Black and White: 2019 – 2020 is that resource!
About the Author
After five decades of either playing, coaching or umpiring the game of baseball, Jim Bettencourt decided to write a series of books called Baseball Rules in Black and White. While umpiring over the last two decades, he has ruled on thousands of plays providing him with an umpire’s perspective of knowing which rules are frequently called during most every game. He has spent a lifetime in baseball, two decades umpiring, attended dozens of camps and clinics, and had many mentors. Bettencourt began officiating high school baseball in 2000. Since that time he has umpired Little League, men’s & women’s softball, Legion, Joe DiMaggio, Pony, High School, Junior College, University Div. II spring & fall ball, and S.F. Bay Area adult leagues.
90,000 He won the NCAA title by beating Houston in the final with Olajuwon and Drexler. But became a legend thanks to the great speech on fighting cancer – Don’t play basketball – Blogs
Meet Jim Valvano.
The final stage of the NCAA undergraduate basketball tournament is gaining momentum. The second stage of the March Madness kicks off today, and the season’s decisive match will take place in just two weeks.
Youth competitions are full of surprises: favorites regularly fail, and upstarts gain universal respect and often find a place in university folklore.But there are also those whose stories spread beyond the boundaries of not only the gymnasiums of educational institutions, but also basketball in general.
Great trainer Jim Valvano managed to emerge victorious from two battles in which no one perceived him as a favorite.
The first is the 1983 NCAA Finals, when the University of North Carolina team led by Jimmy Vee beat the championship leaders from the University of Houston with Clyde Drexler and then Akim Olajuwon.
The second is a tragic confrontation with metastatic cancer that has spread throughout the trainer’s body.Valvano passed away when less than a year had passed since the discovery of the disease, but left behind a great legacy.:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/10822107/usa_today_10389028.jpg)
The legacy of an incredibly passionate personality who has inspired many people to continue to fight the disease under any circumstances.
Wolfpack were middle peasants, but beat Jordan, Sampson, Drexler and Olajuwon in one year
Before the start of the 1982/83 championship, analysts put Wolfpack only sixteenth on the list of contenders for the main NCAA title. Jim led the team for the third year, but still could not make significant progress with her compared to previous seasons.
“Rather, the trees will learn to tap dance, the elephants will take part in the Indianapolis 500 Mile race, and Orson Welles will skip breakfast, lunch and dinner, than the University of North Carolina will become the winner of the NCAA championship,” the coach recalled a favorite quote about his team.
Wolfpack won 10 wins in 17 matches and were given the opportunity to compete for the title of champion of the Atlantic Coast Conference, giving the right to take part in the main student tournament.
To the surprise of many, Valvano’s wards beat Michael Jordan’s Tar Hills, and then the second nationally seeded team at the University of Virginia with Ralph Sampson in the lineup.
Despite the success of the local conference, few believed in the future prospects of North Carolina State in the NCAA elimination games. But Jim was dreaming of victory:
“ We had a workout in which we did not work with the ball and did not do exercises. The only thing we practiced was how to cut the net from ring like a champion. I had golden scissors, we climbed onto each other’s shoulders and cut off the net with them. ”
There were no great basketball players on his team (only four players will make it to the NBA, Thurle Bailey’s best career), but Valvano believed that the guys could do the impossible.
Five games remained before the final, in one of which the team from Virginia was again defeated. Ahead of them was the main match of the year against the first seeded tournament – “Cougars” from Houston.
Despite the presence of future members of the Basketball Hall of Fame in the rivals, Wolfpack was in no way inferior to them during the meeting and even periodically stepped forward. Drexler quickly got four fouls and had to defend more accurately, Olajuwon was experiencing endurance problems due to the fact that the game took place at an altitude of 1550 meters above sea level.
The outcome of the meeting was decided in the final seconds. With an equal score in the last attack, the North Carolina State University players tried to keep the ball and were reluctant to re-pass on the other side of the court. Three seconds before the end of the game, Derek Wittenburg had to execute an unprepared long-range shot. The defender got an awkward pass and started a draft. But suddenly, under the ring of the Houstonians, there was center Lorenzo Charles. He jumped in front of Olajuwon, intercepted the missing ball and hammered it from above under the siren.
youtube.com/embed/GfYb-JTmJs4″/>
Wolfpack became NCAA champions despite numerous predictions and received the unspoken name “Team of Destiny”. And Valvano for the first time was able to put into practice his main life motto: “Survive and go forward.”
Years later, Jim explained to the fans the significance of what had happened:
“Team 83 means so much to me not because of the championship banner under the arches of the arena. She is special because she taught me three things: hope, dream and love.
Taught to be a motivated person with a dream, goal and understanding of how to achieve it. Live with hope and a persistent idea: never quit what you started, never give up! ”
Fired after being accused of violating NCAA rules, but remembered for a great speech
Valvano had a hard time ahead. He worked for another seven years as a team coach at the University of North Carolina, but in 1989 was found to be one of the accused of violating college sports rules.
The coach’s mentees were among the worst academically successful athletes in the country, and they also traded in sneakers and tickets to the games. The case was reviewed by six departments, but none of them could find evidence of more serious violations (such as valuation fraud). As a result of the investigation, almost all charges were dropped from Jim, but the reputational blow turned out to be too impressive: first he was removed from administrative posts, and then fired from the team.In April 1990, Valvano announced his retirement from his coaching career and later went on to work as a sports columnist for ESPN and ABC Sports.
In June 1992, the former trainer was diagnosed with metastatic adrenal adenocarcinoma . The disease spread to the spine and began to affect the bones of the body. Such a late stage actually meant a death sentence.
But Jim did not despair. Together with ESPN, he founded The V Foundation for Cancer Research.Since its foundation in 1993, the foundation has received more than $ 260 million and to this day conducts research aimed at studying cancer.
A highlight of the coach’s post-championship career was a speech at the annual ESPY ceremony on March 4, 1993. Valvano became the first recipient of the Arthur Ashe Award for his coverage of cancer patients (Kevin Love received it in 2020 for raising awareness of mental health issues). Jim’s speech was parsed into quotes, many of which later became legendary.
How to live your day for good reason:
“Time is precious to me. I don’t know how long I have left to live, but I have something to say. Hopefully by the end of my speech I will be able to convey something important.
But there’s nothing to be done. I fight cancer, everyone knows about it. People constantly ask me about how I live now, how my day is going. But nothing has changed for me. I am a very emotional and passionate person. This is what it means to be the son of Rocco and Angelina Valvano./cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/65336784/usa_today_13357329.0.jpg)
It’s a family one. We hug, we kiss, we love.
I believe that there are three things that we should do every day of our life:
The first is to laugh. You must laugh every day.
The second is to think. You should spend some time thinking.
The third is to let your emotions drive you to tears. Tears of happiness and joy.
Think about it. If you were laughing, thinking and crying, then you have spent a full day. Damn all day.Once you start living seven such days a week, something special will happen in your life. ”
On the importance of feeling the moment:
“ It is always important to reflect on how you started, where you are now and where you plan to come . I try to think about it daily. I tried to imagine going on stage and delivering a speech. And so I remembered the very first speech in my life. This was my first job as a coach at Rutgers University.
Vince Lombardi was my idol, I even read his book “Commitment to Excellence”.
In it, Lombardi talks about how he first spoke before the match with his team, the Green Bay Packers, a team of real losers. He wanted to make the conversation emotional and short-lived. Usually the coach enters the dressing room 25-30 minutes before the start of the match. But Vince was in no hurry, he waited. The whole team was worried: where is the coach?
Ten minutes before the game – he’s still gone. Three minutes – Lombardi knocks down the door, breaks into the locker room and starts walking back and forth. Just walk.
And then he says: “Everyone is looking at me.Gentlemen, we can be successful this year if you can focus on just three things. These three things are your family, your religion, and the Green Bay Packers.
It was cool. I decided I would do the same.
Three minutes remain before my first match as a coach at Rutgers University. I’m 21 years old, I’m going to take out the door like Lombardi.
Boom! But it doesn’t open. I almost broke my arm.
And now the players are already helping me in.
Okay, now I, like Lombardi, start walking back and forth and say to these 19-year-olds: “Everyone’s looking at me.Gentlemen, we can be successful this year if you can focus on just three things. These three things are your family, your religion, and the Green Bay Packers.
That’s what I told them. I remember this.
It is important to know where you are. I understand where I am now. But how do you get from your current position to where you want to be in the future? I think you should be experiencing an emotional boost from life. Have a dream, a goal. Be willing to work hard to achieve it. ”
On Fighting Cancer:
“We need your help.I need your help. We need money for research. It won’t save my life. But it will save the lives of my children. Save someone you love.
ESPN supports me. With their funds, we are launching the Jimmy Vee Foundation, which is dedicated to cancer research. His motto is “don’t give up .
.. never give up.”
This is the business that I will do every remaining minute. I will thank God for every day and moment that I have. If you see me, smile and perhaps hug me.It is important.
If you have the opportunity, give support to people with AIDS or our foundation – no matter who. Then someone else will get a chance to survive, lead a decent life and receive treatment for such a terrible disease.
I cannot express my gratitude to ESPN in full. I’m going to work on cancer research as hard as I can. And, perhaps, we will be able to cure someone or achieve some kind of breakthrough.
There is one last thing I want to say. Cancer can take away my physical abilities. But he is not able to touch my mind, my heart and my soul .
These three things will stay with me forever. ”
***
Jim Valvano passed away one and a half months after performing at the age of 47. His story of passion and resilience continues to serve as an example for those wishing to fight the disease.
Photo: Gettyimages.ru/Allsport; East News / AP Photo
Twitter Account Recovery and Deactivation
If you are unable to restore your account in this way, there may be several explanations.
You forgot your credentials
If you have forgotten your password, please contact support and we will try to help you recover your account. When your account is restored, you can request an email to reset your password. Email us from the exact email address associated with your account.
You have restored your account, but the follow / follower or tweet counters have been knocked down
Sometimes the follower / follower or tweet counters do not immediately show the correct numbers after recovery.Don’t worry, everything should be back in place within 24 hours. If more than 48 hours have passed and the counters are still showing erroneous data, please contact support for assistance.
You disabled your account more than 30 days ago
A disabled account can only be restored within 30 days.
If more than 30 days have passed since the disconnection, you cannot restore account . Register a new one.
It looks like your Twitter account has been hacked and disabled
If you believe that your account has been compromised and has been maliciously disabled, please see the Help page for instructions on how to deal with a compromised account, which, among other things, provides a quick way to contact support.
You tried to restore an account, but you received a message stating that the account restore feature is disabled
Do not worry! The recovery function is disabled temporarily, you can try again later.If 30 days from the date your account was disabled soon, you can contact a technical support specialist to help you recover your account.
90,000 Ours in NCAA
Stories of basketball players from Russia and the CIS with experience of playing in the NCAA, American schools or youth clubs in Europe.
Many parents ask the same questions when sending their child to schools and universities in America…
More information …
The story of a basketball player who put her studies in first place, but thanks to basketball she studied for free in America
More information …
How can young basketball players get the attention of foreign coaches?
More information …
Russian forward talks basketball and studies at NCAA
More details…
About why athletes go to study in America, and at what age is it better to do it
More information …
A famous Russian basketball player about his overseas students and the importance of reading the game
More information …
Ukrainian defender “ OleMiss” with experience of American school basketball and European Get Better Academy about his way
More details.
..
A basketball player of the Russian youth team from an American school shares her basketball history and views on the development of young players
More information …
Interview with the Russian forward of the American school Hamilton Heights
More information …
Player of the youth national team of Belarus about youth basketball in Italy
More details…
90,000 If a fair ball is called a “foul,” but it’s really fair and overturned, what happens to the base runners?
In all codes: NFHS (National Federation of High Schools, OBR (Official Baseball Rules – “Big Book” – Professional Rules)) and NCAA (College), if a bats ball is called a foul: it is a foul.
Cannot cancel or appeal. Obvious reasons.
One of the most difficult calls.
Suppose the runner (s) are at the base (s)./cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/57826229/usa_today_10317124.0.jpg)
There is no 3rd base referee … or even if there is someone he backs off from to save his own skin (ever hit by a hitting ball?), So he has a zero angle when called. The ball hit hard down the 3rd baseline. The referee’s plate must clear the sight and keep its eyes away from the foul line. He has about 1.5 seconds to do this. The ball only bounces on decent ground, and the spin lifts it off 3rd base about 3 feet in the air.It goes right around the corner of the base in the air and handles fairly … the runners push the bunch. The appraisal is running.
Or the ball is around the corner of the base and violates the rules. No points. Batter returned to the box.
In any case, one team is not happy. If this was appealed / canceled … where are you going to place the runners?
So … since a Foul call stops all play (and possible defensive plays if the defensive player (s) freeze on the Foul call) it is a foul and there is no appeal or review.
How it should have been.
New York … (Why didn’t they locate the verification headquarters in Cooperstown?) I love that you can view some of the calls, but I think you are getting enough phone calls already.
Aside … reading the rulebook is fun.
Chilr’n listen … Major League Baseball Official Rules – Rule 1. Objectives of the Game
Rule 1.01. “Baseball is a game” …
“… Between two teams”, etc.
“game …”
90,000 EA’s Peter Moore from NCAA Football: “I know we’ll be back”
An Electronic Arts executive and former president of EA Sports says the NCAA football series not only has the potential to return, but is confident that it will one day.
Peter Moore, who moved from EA’s COO to “Competition Chief Executive Officer” to oversee the huge push for esports, discussed the series in an extensive video interview with IGN (starting at 56 minutes below).It was a remarkable departure for a publisher who has been ruthless since the closure of NCAA Football in 2013 and the settlement of a huge lawsuit brought by former college players.
“NCAA Football has been a lightning rod for the bigger challenges of getting paid college athletes to perform, not just in football, but in all college sports,” said Moore, president of EA Sports from 2007 to 2011. year. sad day when we realized: “We are in the field of view of a number of lawsuits.”Several athletes who were eventually combined into a single suit said, “It’s me.” When your attorney’s fees are higher than what you can expect to receive.
“It was an uncertain future for us,” Moore said. “It was a really sad day and we said, ‘We just can’t do this anymore.’ And one day I know that we will return. “
Electronic Arts was sued in 2008, mainly for its practice of compiling NCAA football rosters based on real, active college football players and then removing their names to circumvent NCAA eligibility policies.EA Sports also offers a list exchange feature, and users traditionally spend hours renaming and sharing complete lists on EA Sports servers.
EA Sports did the same for the team of college’s greatest basketball players in their defunct March Madness series. One of them, former UCLA Outstanding Fellow Ed O’Bannon, has filed a lawsuit. (Hall of fame running back Jim Brown also sued EA and recently settled a similar $ 600,000 claim.)
Must Read
The court order mentions the return of the NCAA football series, but this is far from likely
The case became controversial about how the NCAA and others are commercializing the similarities of amateur athletes.Although EA, NCAA and its Chief Licensing Agent have reached a $ 60 million agreement with athletes over the use of the semblance of video games, the lawsuit continues over the huge TV rights fees that the NCAA charges for its broadcasts, which could to change college sports even more dramatically.
Electronic Arts wasn’t the only maker of college sports video games in the past decade. 2K Sports released two NCAA College Football editions early in the decade and were then well known for their College Hoops 2K series, which closed in early 2008 when new management took over Take-Two Interactive and decided not to renew the licensing agreements.
They have not been sued, however.
Since almost any mention of NCAA football triggers excitement for a return to the series, Moore’s outspokenness breaks the long silence that EA imposes on virtually everyone involved with the game. Moore himself noted that checks are still being carried out, limiting what he can say next. He didn’t talk about how he thinks the NCAA football streak could return in a form that fans remember, with real rosters where players either receive fair compensation or give permission to use them.
Entering a game under their own name, whether paid or not, would be in violation of current NCAA rules and would strip them of their eligibility. Last year, the FIFA series removed 13 players from their women’s soccer rosters at the last minute at the request of the NCAA, which said the appearance would jeopardize their eligibility for American universities they also attend.
90,000 newrules2019final – online presentation
1. New rules in 2019
Summary of rule changes
Einar Bolstad, Norway
2.
New rules in 2019 90,017 90,135
Most important changes in rules and interpretation in
2019, including editorial changes (marked EC).
The number of differences of IFAF rules from
has slightly increased
NCAA.
Always consult the rulebook for changes, we are
we do not provide a complete list. The rulebook can be downloaded at
address: http://myiafoa.org/rules/2019/ifaf2019/ifafrules.pdf
3.2-11-3 – Kick the ball (previously – hand, aka batting)
Ball hitting – intentionally hitting the ball or changing
directions of his movement with his head, hand or hand.
If you are not sure – rather, it was an accidental touch
ball, not kick. Hitting the ball does not change the status of the ball.
Heading the ball is batting.
This is a specific IFAF rule.
4.2-19-2-b (EC) – Forward Pass
When a team A player is holding the ball to throw it at
direction forward to the neutral zone, any 90 135
deliberate movement of his hand with the ball under
his full control, begins the forward pass phase.
Previously, there was a “movement of the hand”, now – the hand.
5.3-2-4 – Hours of rally after free kick or touchdown
Changes to draw hours will have the following consequences:
• After a free kick:
After touchdown:
The 40 second rally clock will start after the ball reaches
dead – exactly as after a normal rally from a melee.
Only applies if team B kicks in next
(IFAF).
The 40 second rally clock will start after the ball reaches
dead – exactly as after a normal rally from a melee.
The goal is to speed up the game.
No whistle when the ball is ready – the ball is ready to play in accordance with
rule 2-2-4-a.
6. 8-3-2, 8-6-2 (EC) – Ball movement
After a touchdown or touchback, the team that will be in the next
team A, may ask to change position
ball between hashes – but only if the draw clock is
more than 25 seconds left.
Other provisions continue to apply.
7.3-3-7-a (EC) – Command timeout length
Full length (including 25 seconds at the start of the draw)
the command timeout is always 1:30.
Corrects a bug in the book that mentioned both 1:25 and 1:30.
8. 3-4-3 – Dishonest tactics related to watches
If the game clock was stopped for a penalty of
foul of the leading team or any team at
equal score, and there are less than two minutes left until the end of the half,
they will be triggered by snap, if the team wants it, against
which the foul was committed.
Clarifies the issued situation from the previous wording.
IMPORTANT! Previously, the phrase contained the word “only”: “If the game
the clock was stopped only for the execution of the penalty … “Word
“Only” was removed, so the rule applies even then,
when there were other reasons for stopping the clock.
9.4-1-2-b-3 – Unintentional whistle on scrum hit (1/3)
The usual rule is to replay from the previous point.
New
the exception complements the following:
If a scrum kick crosses the neutral zone and Team B does not 90 135
touched thereafter, and if other exceptions do not apply – ball
becomes dead and belongs to team B at the point where the blow ends.
If this point is in front of the neutral zone – the strike crossed the neutral zone
zone, and PSK applies if 10-2-3 is in effect.Attempting
shot on goal, a goal will be awarded if provisions
are met
rules 8-4-1.
This is an IFAF rule, not an NCAA rule.
What does this mean?
10.4-1-2-b-3 – Unintentional whistle on scrum hit (2/3)
Eliminating “normalizes” the consequences of an unintentional whistle during
blow from the scrum. Team A relinquishes possession by hitting the ball,
so as a result, team B should get the ball – even at
unintentional whistle.
For the purposes of this rule, “end point of impact” means:
• Where the ball touches a player or referee
• Where the ball touches the ground after the whistle
• Where the ball crosses the boundary line
The provisions of the PSKE apply.
Whistle on attempted kick after the ball has crossed
neutral zone – a successful goal will count.
11.4-1-2-b-3 – Unintentional whistle on scrum hit (3/3)
In this case, there is no option to replay the attempt.
Inadvertent whistle given after touching the ball 90 135
team B, may be subject to the rule about “
more
ongoing action ”.
12.4-2-3 (EC) – Loose ball out of bounds
The ball is not under the control of the player (unless it is a shot by which
a goal is scored) is considered out of bounds when it touches
ground, player, referee or anything outside the field of play, or at
or outside the boundary lines.
The word “control” has replaced the word “ownership”.Example:
Jumping A88 gains full control of the ball passed by
pass forward from the A12. A88’s right foot lands within the field, and
he retains full control of the ball when he touches the ground. Player
B28 out of bounds touches the ball while A88 is jumping and
controlled the ball.
RESOLUTION: Pass accepted.
Old rules: missed pass because A88 couldn’t
have possession before the pass is completed.
13.6-1-2-a – Moving the ball on a free kick
After the signal that the ball is ready for play, the ball may be
moved laterally only after a command timeout.
14.6-1-2-b-3 – Missing the ball on an indirect free kick
If a team A player tries to shoot the ball but
misses (whether or not) it is a dead ball foul
for illegal procedure [S19: IFK].
IFAF rule, not NCAA.
15.8-3-2-a – Implementation when time expired
General rule: if a touchdown is entered in a try, and the time is
fourth quarter expired, conversion will not play,
if the points gained during it cannot change the outcome of the game.
New exception: if the scoring team leads one
or two points, she has the option not to play the implementation.
16.9-1-3, 9-1-4 (EC) – Targeting as flagrant foul
Targeting is now always a flagrant foul.
This changes the application of the penalty after change of ownership to
implementation or in additional periods.
17.9-1-6-a – Blocks below the belt (1/3)
New season – new rules on the block below the belt …
The changes apply to Team A prior to the change of ownership.
Linear, initially with the whole body inside
envelope, can legally block below the waist inside
envelope or in the free blocking zone while the ball is in
envelope. All other Team A players may block below
belt only if initial contact force is applied 90 135
in front. “Attached at the front” means “between 10 and 2” at the front
from the zone of concentration of the player who is blocked.
IFAF has added “or in a free zone” to the rules.
18.9-1-6-a – Blocks below the belt (2/3)
Exceptions:
Team A players cannot block below the belt when block
happens five or more yards ahead of the neutral zone.
Players outside the envelope on snap or anytime after
him, or those who move, cannot block in the direction of
to the original position of the ball.
Once the ball has left the envelope, the player cannot block at
towards its end line.
19.9-1-6-a – Blocks below the belt (3/3)
Changelog:
Nothing has changed for the liners inside the envelope.
Other A players must block from the front, including backs inside
envelope. The front is the area where
is concentrated.
blocked player, and “from 10 to 2” is applied to her.
The position of the shoulders is not a determining factor where this zone is –
concentration is the decisive factor. Block should be
from this zone “from 10 to 2”.
No blocks below the belt five or more yards ahead of
neutral zone.
Blocks to the original ball position are illegal even when the player is
with the ball passed the neutral zone. To be able to
block to original ball position, backs must be at least
partly inside the envelope when you snap.
20.9-1-7-c – Block out of field
Forbidden to player obviously out of bounds
block an opponent who is out of bounds.
Previously, the foul point was the point where the blocker crossed the line,
however, it is now the closest point to the contact point at
boundary line
end line?)
IFAF rule, not NCAA.
21.9-1-9 (EC) – Rudeness against the passer
The reworking of the RTP rule generally adds two things:
Driving Passer into the Ground and Landing on Him with action that
punishes the player is an RTP.
Any personal foul against a passer is an RTP.
22.9-1-11-b – Jump definition changed
If the defending player moves forward and tries
block a field goal or conversion by jumping over
the plane of the opponent’s body is a foul. Not a foul,
if the player was stationary in one at the moment of snap
a yard from the scrimmage line.
It is also foul if the defending player is inside the envelope
tries to block the pant by jumping over plane
the enemy’s body.
23.9-1-16 (EC) – Rude penalty against kicker
RTK penalty now applies to “any other
a personal foul against the kicker at
the process of hitting the ball or immediately after it.
”
24.9-2-1 – DQ for gross unsportsmanlike behavior
“Severe offenders who are players or substitutes,
will be disqualified. ”
The marked text has been removed, and now the same rule
applies to the coach and other sideline personnel.
IFAF rule, not NCAA.
25.9-2-2 – Dishonest tactics
Two additions to the rule:
Team A cannot use unusual actions or conversations
to mislead the opponent that the snap or kick is not
will happen soon. ”
“Actions that simulate trauma and thereby introduce into
are prohibited.
delusion of opponents or judges. ”
The first point has already been included in the
manual.
judging, but now it’s the rule.The second covers the recent
US precedent when a player lay motionless on the field,
so that the opponent stops covering him.
IFAF rule, not NCAA.
26.9-2-6-d (EC) – Acting Disqualified Head Coach
Head coach who has been disqualified may appoint
acting.
