How did UC Davis perform against Ohio State in women’s lacrosse. What were the key statistics and outcomes of their matchups. When and where did these games take place. What trends emerged from their head-to-head encounters.
UC Davis vs Ohio State: A Brief Overview of Women’s Lacrosse Encounters
The UC Davis women’s lacrosse team has faced Ohio State twice in their history, with both encounters resulting in losses for the Aggies. These matchups took place between April 13, 2007, and February 29, 2008, providing a snapshot of the competitive landscape between these two programs during that period.
Breaking Down the Matchups: Dates, Scores, and Locations
Let’s examine the details of each game:
- April 13, 2007: UC Davis lost to Ohio State 17-4 in Columbus, Ohio
- February 29, 2008: UC Davis fell to Ohio State 18-7 in Davis, California
These results showcase a clear dominance by Ohio State during their encounters with UC Davis. The Buckeyes outscored the Aggies by a significant margin in both games, demonstrating their strength on both home and away turfs.
Analyzing UC Davis’ Performance and Statistics
How did UC Davis fare statistically in these matchups? Here’s a breakdown of key figures:
- Total goals scored: 11
- Average goals per game: 5.5
- Largest margin of defeat: 13 goals (April 13, 2007)
- Smallest margin of defeat: 11 goals (February 29, 2008)
These statistics highlight the challenging nature of the matchups for UC Davis. Despite an improvement in their scoring output from the first to the second game, the Aggies struggled to keep pace with Ohio State’s offensive prowess.
Ohio State’s Dominance: A Closer Look at the Buckeyes’ Performance
Ohio State’s performance against UC Davis was nothing short of impressive. Here’s what the numbers tell us about the Buckeyes’ showing:
- Total goals scored: 35
- Average goals per game: 17.5
- Smallest margin of victory: 11 goals (February 29, 2008)
- Largest margin of victory: 13 goals (April 13, 2007)
The Buckeyes displayed consistent offensive firepower in both encounters, maintaining a double-digit goal output and securing comfortable victories. Their ability to perform at a high level both at home and away speaks to the strength of their program during this period.
Home vs Away: Analyzing the Impact of Game Locations
Does the location of the games reveal any interesting patterns? Let’s examine:
- UC Davis home record vs Ohio State: 0-1
- UC Davis away record vs Ohio State: 0-1
While the sample size is limited, it’s clear that UC Davis faced similar challenges regardless of the game’s location. The Aggies’ inability to secure a victory either at home or away underscores the competitive gap between the two programs during this timeframe.
The Home Field Advantage: Myth or Reality?
In the case of these matchups, the concept of home field advantage didn’t seem to play a significant role. Ohio State managed to secure a larger margin of victory (13 goals) in their away game compared to their home game (11 goals). This suggests that factors beyond game location, such as team strength and preparation, were more influential in determining the outcomes.
Tracking Progress: UC Davis’ Performance from 2007 to 2008
Did UC Davis show signs of improvement between their first and second encounters with Ohio State? Let’s analyze the data:
- 2007 game: 4 goals scored, 17 goals conceded
- 2008 game: 7 goals scored, 18 goals conceded
These figures indicate a mixed bag of results for UC Davis. On one hand, the Aggies managed to increase their offensive output, nearly doubling their goal tally from 4 to 7. However, they also conceded one more goal in the 2008 matchup compared to the 2007 game.
Offensive Improvement vs Defensive Challenges
The increase in goals scored suggests that UC Davis made strides in their offensive strategies and execution. However, the persistent high number of goals conceded indicates that defensive improvements were still needed to compete more effectively against powerhouse programs like Ohio State.
The Bigger Picture: UC Davis Women’s Lacrosse Program Development
While these two games against Ohio State resulted in losses for UC Davis, they provide valuable insights into the program’s standing and areas for growth. Here are some key takeaways:
- Competitive gap: The scores indicate a significant competitive gap between UC Davis and Ohio State during this period.
- Offensive progress: UC Davis showed improvement in their offensive output from 2007 to 2008.
- Defensive challenges: The Aggies’ defense struggled to contain Ohio State’s high-powered offense in both encounters.
- Program development: These games likely served as learning experiences for UC Davis, highlighting areas for improvement and providing motivation for future seasons.
Building for the Future
Facing strong opponents like Ohio State can be instrumental in a program’s development. These challenging matchups often expose areas that need improvement and can serve as catalysts for positive changes in training, recruitment, and overall program strategy.
Ohio State’s Women’s Lacrosse: A Formidable Opponent
The results of these games also shed light on the strength of Ohio State’s women’s lacrosse program during this period. What can we infer about the Buckeyes based on these matchups?
- Consistent performance: Ohio State demonstrated the ability to perform at a high level both at home and away.
- Offensive prowess: The Buckeyes showcased a potent offense, scoring 17+ goals in both games.
- Defensive solidity: Ohio State’s defense effectively limited UC Davis’ scoring opportunities, particularly in the 2007 matchup.
- Program strength: These results suggest that Ohio State had established itself as a strong program capable of dominating less experienced teams.
Ohio State’s Recipe for Success
Ohio State’s performance in these games highlights several key factors contributing to their success:
- Offensive firepower: The ability to consistently score in high volumes
- Defensive strategy: Effectively limiting opponents’ scoring opportunities
- Adaptability: Maintaining high performance levels in different environments
- Program depth: Showcasing strength across multiple seasons
These elements likely played crucial roles in Ohio State’s dominance during their encounters with UC Davis and potentially against other opponents as well.
Lessons Learned: Implications for UC Davis Women’s Lacrosse
What valuable lessons could UC Davis have taken from these matchups against Ohio State? Here are some potential insights:
- Identifying strengths and weaknesses: These games likely highlighted specific areas where UC Davis needed to improve to compete at a higher level.
- Setting benchmarks: Ohio State’s performance could have served as a benchmark for UC Davis to aspire to in terms of offensive output and defensive solidity.
- Building mental toughness: Facing a strong opponent can help develop resilience and mental toughness within a team.
- Strategic planning: These experiences may have influenced UC Davis’ long-term strategic planning for program development.
Turning Challenges into Opportunities
While losing by significant margins can be disheartening, such experiences often become catalysts for growth and improvement. For UC Davis, these games against Ohio State may have served as important stepping stones in the program’s journey towards becoming more competitive at the highest levels of collegiate women’s lacrosse.
The Role of Non-Conference Matchups in Program Development
Why do programs like UC Davis schedule games against strong opponents like Ohio State? The benefits of such non-conference matchups include:
- Exposure to high-level competition: Playing against top teams provides valuable experience for players and coaches.
- Program evaluation: These games offer a clear measure of where a program stands compared to established powerhouses.
- Recruiting tool: Competing against well-known programs can attract potential recruits who want to play at a high level.
- Preparation for conference play: Tough non-conference games can help prepare teams for the challenges of their conference schedule.
Balancing Challenge and Confidence
While challenging matchups are important, it’s crucial for programs to balance these games with contests where they have a higher chance of success. This approach helps maintain team confidence while still providing opportunities for growth and improvement.
Looking Beyond the Scoreboard: Measuring Progress and Success
How can programs like UC Davis measure progress and success beyond just wins and losses, especially when facing top-tier opponents? Consider these alternative metrics:
- Individual player development: Tracking the improvement of individual players’ skills and performances over time.
- Team statistics: Monitoring improvements in various team statistics, such as shots on goal, draw controls, or defensive stops.
- Competitive quarters or halves: Identifying periods within games where the team performed well, even if the overall result was a loss.
- Program growth: Assessing factors like recruitment success, fan engagement, and overall program reputation.
Celebrating Small Victories
In the context of UC Davis’ games against Ohio State, examples of progress might include:
- The increase in goals scored from 2007 to 2008
- Any improvements in specific aspects of play, such as draw controls or defensive stops
- Individual player performances that stood out despite the overall team result
Recognizing and celebrating these smaller victories can help maintain team morale and provide motivation for continued improvement.
The Impact of Coaching in Competitive Matchups
How does coaching influence a team’s performance in challenging games like those between UC Davis and Ohio State? Key aspects of coaching impact include:
- Game planning: Developing strategies to maximize team strengths and exploit opponent weaknesses
- In-game adjustments: The ability to adapt tactics based on how the game unfolds
- Player management: Effectively using substitutions and managing playing time to keep the team fresh and competitive
- Mental preparation: Helping players maintain confidence and focus, especially when facing a strong opponent
Learning from Defeat
Skilled coaches can turn losses into valuable learning experiences. For UC Davis, the games against Ohio State likely provided numerous teaching moments that could be used to improve future performances.
Future Prospects: UC Davis Women’s Lacrosse Beyond 2008
While our data focuses on the 2007-2008 period, it’s worth considering how these experiences might have influenced UC Davis women’s lacrosse program in subsequent years. Potential areas of impact include:
- Program goals: Setting new benchmarks and goals based on the performance gap identified in these games
- Recruitment strategy: Targeting players who could help close the competitive gap with top programs
- Training focus: Adjusting training regimens to address weaknesses exposed in these matchups
- Scheduling strategy: Balancing challenging non-conference games with more winnable matchups to build program confidence
Building a Competitive Program
The path to building a consistently competitive program often involves periods of challenge and growth. For UC Davis, the games against Ohio State may have served as important milestones in this journey, providing valuable insights and motivation for future improvement.
As we reflect on these historical matchups between UC Davis and Ohio State in women’s lacrosse, it’s clear that they represent more than just wins and losses. These games offer a window into the developmental stages of UC Davis’ program, the strengths of Ohio State’s team, and the broader landscape of collegiate women’s lacrosse during this period. While the outcomes were decidedly in Ohio State’s favor, the true value of these encounters lies in the lessons learned, the experiences gained, and the motivation they likely provided for UC Davis to continue striving for improvement and competitiveness in the years to come.
UC Davis Athletics Women’s Lacrosse History vs Ohio State
Women’s Lacrosse History vs Ohio State from Apr 13, 2007 -
Feb 29, 2008
Last Matchup
Feb. 29,2008
7
vs.
18
Recap
Losses
2
Streak
L2
Longest Win Streak
0 Games
N/A
Longest Losing Streak
2
Games
4/13/2007 – 2/29/2008
Home Record
0-1
Away Record
0-1
Conference Record
0-0
First Matchup
L 17-4
4/13/2007
Last 2 Matchups
0-2
4/13/2007-2/29/2008
Largest Margin of Victory
N/A
N/A
Smallest Margin of Victory
N/A
N/A
Total Goals
24
Average Goals
12
| Date | Season | Location | Score | Media |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 29, 2008 2/29/2008 |
2008 |
|
|
|
|
April 13, 2007 4/13/2007 |
2007 |
|
|
|
Win
Loss
Stevens Institute of Technology Athletics Men’s Lacrosse History vs Ohio Wesleyan University
Skip To Main Content
Skip To Main Content
The Official Site
of Stevens Athletics
Men’s Lacrosse History vs Ohio Wesleyan University from Mar 12, 2003 -
Apr 8, 2007
Last Matchup
Apr.
8,2007
16
at
8
Recap
Losses
2
Streak
W2
Longest Win Streak
2
Games
5/6/2006 – 4/8/2007
Longest Losing Streak
1
Game
5/7/2005 – 5/7/2005
Home Record
2-0
Away Record
1-1
Conference Record
0-0
First Matchup
L 7-14
3/12/2003
Last 5 Matchups
3-2
3/12/2003-4/8/2007
Largest Margin of Victory
W 17-6
5/6/2006
Smallest Margin of Victory
W 11-10
5/8/2004
Total Goals
60
Average Goals
12
| Date | Season | Location | Score | Media |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 8, 2007 4/8/2007 |
2007 |
|
|
|
|
May 6, 2006 5/6/2006 |
2006 |
|
|
|
|
May 7, 2005 5/7/2005 |
2005 |
|
|
|
|
May 8, 2004 5/8/2004 |
2004 |
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003 3/12/2003 |
2003 |
|
|
|
J.
J.
Win
Loss
Sticky bar
Speaker of the Ohio House of Representatives removed from office due to corruption allegations
Last week, the Speaker of the Ohio House of Representatives was removed from office.
According to the FBI, the legislator received millions of dollars in bribes when he passed a law providing financial support for two nuclear plants.
Householder supporters believe that this historic move is contrary to the constitutional principle that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty. (Source: Wikimedia Commons)
Republican Larry Householder lost his seat in the Ohio House of Representatives and was arrested almost a year ago by the US federal authorities in connection with a $60 million corruption scandal. However, the legislator has not yet been brought to trial and sentenced.
Although the Speaker of the Ohio House of Representatives has been removed from office for the first time in more than a century, Householder is not the first to leave office in the wake of a federal investigation.
In 2004, he resigned because he was suspected of money laundering, but the authorities dropped the case without formal charges. In 2016, Householder was re-elected, which shocked many.
Before returning to work, he told the Associated Press that he had “unfinished business that concerns the county.”
Last July, while Householder was Speaker, the FBI filed a criminal complaint against him and four associates.
“The defendants enriched themselves and increased Householder’s political power through a scheme designed to deprive the public of the legislator’s honest services,” FBI agent Blaine Wetzel said in an affidavit.
Former Attorney David De Villers said it was “probably the largest bribery and money laundering scheme ever targeted against the people of the state of Ohio.” Two other defendants pleaded guilty. Householder pleaded not guilty.
“I intend to enter the Cincinnati courtroom and walk out free and innocent,” Householder said last Tuesday. But even before the trial, he was forced to leave the Ohio House of Representatives, depriving him of elective office.
The Ohio Constitution states that members of the House can be expelled for “unlawful conduct,” and some representatives are convinced that Householder’s unprecedented corruption points to breaches of professional ethics, whether he’s involved or not.
