How did the 2023 DIII Men’s Basketball Championship unfold. Which teams made it to the Final Four. What was the most exciting moment of the tournament. Who emerged as the national champion.
The Road to the Final Four: Elite Teams Battle for Supremacy
The 2023 Division III Men’s Basketball Championship showcased the best of collegiate athletics, with teams from across the nation vying for the coveted national title. As the tournament progressed, four exceptional squads emerged from the pack, earning their spots in the Final Four:
- Christopher Newport University
- Mount Union
- Swarthmore College
- University of Wisconsin-Whitewater
These teams demonstrated remarkable skill, determination, and teamwork throughout their journey to the semifinals. Their performances captivated fans and exemplified the spirit of Division III athletics.
Semifinal Showdowns: Intense Battles for Championship Berths
The semifinal matchups provided spectators with edge-of-their-seat excitement and showcased the high level of competition in DIII basketball.
Christopher Newport vs. Swarthmore
In a closely contested battle, Christopher Newport emerged victorious over Swarthmore with a final score of 69-66. The Captains’ defensive prowess and clutch shooting in the closing minutes secured their spot in the championship game.
Mount Union vs. Wisconsin-Whitewater
Mount Union pulled off a thrilling upset against Wisconsin-Whitewater, triumphing 83-79 in a high-scoring affair. The Purple Raiders’ balanced offensive attack and timely defensive stops propelled them to the final.
The Championship Game: A Battle for the Ages
The national championship game between Christopher Newport and Mount Union lived up to the hype, providing fans with a memorable conclusion to the tournament.
How did the final game unfold? The contest was a back-and-forth affair, with both teams trading leads throughout. As the clock wound down, the tension in the arena was palpable.
With just seconds remaining and the score tied, Christopher Newport’s Jahn Hines received the ball and launched a shot that would etch his name in DIII basketball history. The buzzer-beater found its mark, delivering a 74-72 victory and the national championship to the Captains.
Christopher Newport’s Path to Glory: A Season of Determination
Christopher Newport’s journey to the national title was marked by resilience and consistent excellence. The Captains navigated a challenging regular season schedule and entered the tournament primed for success.
What were some key victories in Christopher Newport’s tournament run?
- First Round: Defeated Farmingdale State 61-60 in a nail-biter
- Second Round: Overcame Hampden-Sydney 72-59
- Sweet Sixteen: Bested Mary Hardin-Baylor 72-60
- Elite Eight: Triumphed over Wheaton (IL) 76-70
These victories showcased the Captains’ ability to perform under pressure and adapt to various playing styles, setting the stage for their ultimate triumph in the championship game.
Tournament Standouts: Individual Performances That Shone Bright
While basketball is a team sport, several players distinguished themselves with exceptional performances throughout the tournament.
Jahn Hines – Christopher Newport
Hines’ championship-winning shot will be remembered for years to come, but his overall tournament performance was equally impressive. The junior guard consistently delivered in clutch moments, earning him tournament MVP honors.
Christian Anigwe – Swarthmore
Anigwe’s dominant interior presence and efficient scoring were crucial to Swarthmore’s Final Four run. The senior center’s ability to control the paint on both ends of the floor made him a nightmare for opponents.
Collen Gurley – Mount Union
Gurley’s sharpshooting and leadership were instrumental in Mount Union’s surprising run to the championship game. The senior guard’s ability to create offense and defend multiple positions made him a valuable asset for the Purple Raiders.
The Impact of Coaching: Strategies That Made the Difference
Behind every successful team stands a skilled coaching staff, and the 2023 DIII Men’s Basketball Championship was no exception. The tournament showcased the tactical acumen of some of the best minds in collegiate basketball.
How did coaching influence the outcome of key games? Let’s examine some crucial strategic decisions:
- Christopher Newport’s John Krikorian masterfully managed his team’s rotation, ensuring fresh legs in the closing minutes of tight games.
- Swarthmore’s Landry Kosmalski employed a suffocating zone defense that stifled opponents’ offensive rhythm throughout the tournament.
- Mount Union’s Mike Fuline’s emphasis on offensive rebounding created numerous second-chance opportunities, proving decisive in close contests.
These coaching decisions, among many others, played a significant role in shaping the tournament’s outcome and demonstrated the importance of preparation and in-game adjustments at the highest levels of DIII basketball.
The Role of Fan Support: Creating an Electric Atmosphere
The passion and enthusiasm of DIII basketball fans were on full display throughout the tournament, creating an electrifying atmosphere at every venue.
How did fan support impact the games? The energy in the arenas often provided a tangible boost to the home teams, influencing momentum swings and fueling comeback efforts. Traveling supporters also made their presence felt, with many making long journeys to cheer on their beloved squads.
The championship game, held at a neutral site, featured a packed house with a near-even split between Christopher Newport and Mount Union faithful. The resulting cacophony of cheers and chants added an extra layer of intensity to an already thrilling contest.
Looking Ahead: The Future of DIII Men’s Basketball
As the dust settles on the 2023 championship, attention naturally turns to the future of DIII men’s basketball. The tournament showcased the depth of talent and competitive balance within the division, promising exciting seasons to come.
What can we expect in the coming years? Several trends and storylines are worth monitoring:
- The continued rise of programs like Christopher Newport and Mount Union, who will look to build on their recent success
- The impact of graduating seniors and incoming recruits on perennial powerhouses
- Potential changes to tournament formats or scheduling in response to the evolving landscape of collegiate athletics
- The ongoing emphasis on academic excellence alongside athletic achievement, a hallmark of DIII sports
As these storylines unfold, one thing remains certain: the passion, skill, and sportsmanship displayed in the 2023 DIII Men’s Basketball Championship will continue to inspire players, coaches, and fans alike for years to come.
The Lasting Legacy of the 2023 Championship
The 2023 DIII Men’s Basketball Championship will be remembered not only for its thrilling conclusion but also for the broader impact it had on the sport and its participants.
How will this tournament influence future generations of DIII basketball players? The stories of perseverance, teamwork, and clutch performances will serve as inspiration for aspiring athletes across the country. The success of smaller programs like Christopher Newport demonstrates that with the right combination of talent, coaching, and determination, any team can achieve greatness.
Furthermore, the championship highlighted the unique charm of DIII athletics. Unlike their Division I counterparts, these student-athletes compete primarily for the love of the game and the pride of representing their institutions. The purity of this motivation was evident in every dive for a loose ball, every strategic timeout, and every post-game embrace.
As we reflect on the 2023 championship, it’s clear that its impact extends far beyond the final score. The tournament showcased the best of collegiate athletics: sportsmanship, academic excellence, and the thrill of competition. It reminded us why sports matter and why the stories that unfold on the court can inspire us long after the final buzzer sounds.
The memories created during this tournament – from Christopher Newport’s buzzer-beating triumph to the countless moments of individual and team excellence along the way – will be cherished by players, coaches, and fans for years to come. As we look forward to future seasons, we do so with a renewed appreciation for the magic of DIII men’s basketball and the remarkable athletes who make it so special.
2023 Division III Men’s Basketball Official Bracket
Get Tickets |
Printable Bracket |
FINAL
Randolph-Macon 73
Wilson 36
FINAL
Scranton 65
N.C. Wesleyan 64
FINAL
John Carroll 91
Albertus Magnus 80
FINAL
Oswego St. 80
Marymount (VA) 62
FINAL
Hamilton 84
Montclair St. 75
FINAL
Johns Hopkins 89
Mitchell 71
FINAL
Wis.-Whitewater 90
Wabash 83
FINAL
CWRU 82
Arcadia 76
FINAL
Randolph-Macon 63
Scranton 41
FINAL
John Carroll 61
Oswego St. 66
FINAL
Hamilton 71
Johns Hopkins 81
FINAL
Wis.
-Whitewater 78
CWRU 75
FINAL
Randolph-Macon 63
Oswego St. 74
FINAL
Johns Hopkins 82
Wis.-Whitewater 83
FINAL
Oswego St. 74
Wis.-Whitewater 77
FINAL
Swarthmore 93
SUNY Delhi 64
FINAL
St. John Fisher 74
Whitworth 59
FINAL
Tufts 78
Widener 66
FINAL
Keene St. 89
Baruch 78
FINAL
Rochester (NY) 71
Nichols 74
FINAL
Middlebury 76
Worcester St. 51
FINAL
Mary Washington 69
St. Lawrence 42
FINAL
Stockton 86
La Roche 70
FINAL
Swarthmore 101
St. John Fisher 78
FINAL
Tufts 72
Keene St.
77
FINAL
Nichols 73
Middlebury 66
FINAL
Mary Washington 65
Stockton 68
FINAL
Swarthmore 82
Keene St. 58
FINAL
Nichols 86
Stockton 68
FINAL
Swarthmore 78
Nichols 77
Semifinals
Championship
Semifinals
FINAL
Wis.-Whitewater 79
Mount Union 83
FINAL
Mount Union 72
Chris. Newport 74
FINAL
Swarthmore 66
Chris. Newport 69
National Champion
Chris. Newport
FINAL
Rowan 83
Cal Lutheran 77
FINAL
Utica 72
Babson 60
FINAL
Hope 79
Bethany Lutheran 65
FINAL
Wis.
-Oshkosh 86
Fontbonne 58
FINAL
North Park 88
Sewanee 69
FINAL
WashU 69
Coe 48
FINAL
NYU 64
Lancaster Bible 67
FINAL
Mount Union 73
Anderson (IN) 65
FINAL
Rowan 83
Utica 72
FINAL
Hope 50
Wis.-Oshkosh 51
FINAL
North Park 72
WashU 69
FINAL
Lancaster Bible 66
Mount Union 90
FINAL
Rowan 72
Wis.-Oshkosh 91
FINAL
North Park 85
Mount Union 102
FINAL
Wis.-Oshkosh 67
Mount Union 78
FINAL
Chris. Newport 61
Farmingdale St. 60
FINAL
Hampden-Sydney 63
Emory 59
FINAL
St.
Thomas (TX) 75
East Tex. Baptist 79
FINAL
Mary Hardin-Baylor 81
Schreiner 78
FINAL
Carleton 77
St. Norbert 81
FINAL
Wheaton (IL) 79
Illinois Col. 66
FINAL
Pomona-Pitzer 53
Williams 78
FINAL
Saint Joseph (CT) 76
Chatham 53
FINAL
Chris. Newport 72
Hampden-Sydney 59
FINAL
East Tex. Baptist 70
Mary Hardin-Baylor 72
FINAL
St. Norbert 71
Wheaton (IL) 75
FINAL
Williams 54
Saint Joseph (CT) 75
FINAL
Chris. Newport 72
Mary Hardin-Baylor 60
FINAL
Wheaton (IL) 74
Saint Joseph (CT) 67
FINAL
Chris.
Newport 76
Wheaton (IL) 70
Latest DIII Men’s Basketball News
DIII Men’s Basketball
Coaches announced for NCAA College Basketball Academies
DIII Men’s Basketball
Christopher Newport wins DIII men’s basketball title on buzzer-beating shot
DIII Men’s Basketball
Christopher Newport wins the 2023 DIII men’s basketball championship
DIII Men’s Basketball
2023 DIII men’s basketball championship: semifinal recap
DIII Men’s Basketball
2023 DIII men’s basketball semifinal: Mount Union vs Wisconsin-Whitewater full replay
DIII Men’s Basketball
2023 DIII men’s basketball semifinal: Christopher Newport vs Swarthmore full replay
DIII Men’s Basketball
50 years later, the 1973 Guilford men’s basketball team reminisces on their NAIA national championship
DIII Men’s Basketball
2023 NCAA Division III men’s basketball committee announces championship field
Advertisement
NCAA College Men’s Basketball Scores, Schedule
All ConferencesAMCCAmerican RiversASCAtlantic EastC2CCCCCCIWCCSCentennialCSACCUNYACDIII IndependentEmpire 8Great NortheastHCACLandmarkLiberty LeagueLittle EastMAC CommonwealthMAC FreedomMASCACMIACMichigan Intercol.
Ath. Assn.MWCNACCNCACNECCNESCACNEWMACNJACNorth AtlanticNWCOACODACPACSAASCACSCIACSkylineSLIACSUNYACUAAUMACUnited EastUSA SouthWIAC
W
01
T
02
F
03
S
04
S
05
M
06
T
07
W
08
T
09
F
10
S
11
S
12
M
13
T
14
W
15
T
16
F
17
S
18
S
19
M
20
T
21
W
22
T
23
F
24
S
25
S
26
M
27
T
28
W
29
T
30
F
31
NHL Fantastic Four :: Hockey :: RBC Sport
Overseas, in the world’s strongest hockey league, it’s time for the conference finals.
Playoffs 2012 is coming to the finish line!
Photo: NHL
Makar Dmitriev
Overseas, in the strongest hockey league in the world, the time has come for the conference finals. Playoffs 2012 is coming to the finish line!
West
Phoenix Coyotes (3) – Los Angeles Kings (8)
Personal meetings in the regular season: + 3 – 3 (0:2, 3:2, 3:4, 1:0, 0:1, 5:4).
It can be assumed that the number of hockey fans who believe in signs and even curses has increased significantly in recent weeks. Before the start of the playoffs, almost all North American experts, and in parallel with them, the bookmakers, designated the winner of the regular season, Vancouver, as a clear favorite in the West, and Pittsburgh, Evgeni Malkin and Sidney Crosby, in the East.
Two weeks have passed. Note “contenders” lost with a bang already in the first round to “Kings” and “Pilots” respectively. A holy place is never empty, and the role of the next favorite of the Stanley Cup was solemnly hoisted “St.
Louis” under the control of the famous conservative coach Ken Hitchcock, who in the shortest possible time changed the playing style of the “Bluesmen” beyond recognition. For several months this team looked monolithic, excellently organized and devoid of pronounced weaknesses. Note that after the first home defeat, “St. Louis” from “Los Angeles” bookmakers brought to the first line … “Philadelphia Flyers”.
What happened in a series of “Kings” and “Bluesmen”, which ended with a rare 4-0 score in favor of the alleged outsider? Hockey players, “Kings” consistently implemented the same scenario that brought them success at the start of the confrontation with the “Orcas”. The maximum density in his zone and the attentiveness of the defenders in the patch, sharp and swift attacks on the move. Knocked down “St. Louis” and the fact that forced to become the team’s main goalkeeper in the playoffs Brian Elliot (Slovak Jaroslav Galak was injured) outright lost the duel to the magnificent Jonathan Quick.
Faced with the need to recoup in the course of the series, Hitchcock’s wards tried to modify their game concept to a more attacking one, but in the end this also played into the hands of the rivals.
And in the other Western Conference semi-finals, the Coyotes of Phoenix gradually outplayed the Predators. For both clubs, finishing in the top four teams in the league would be the undisputed best result in history, and therefore the stakes in this dispute were really high.
The success of the club from Arizona has largely contributed to the internal problems of Nashville. The general manager of the team, David Poyle, did everything possible to return Alexander Radulov to the NHL, as well as to get Belarusian sniper Montreal Andrey Kostitsyn on St. George’s Day. And now, at the most crucial moment, both hockey players were suspended from participation in the matches of the series against the “Phoenix” for violations of the sports regime.
One gets the impression that Barry Trotz’s powerful, organized, traditionally athletic team is simply contraindicated for any bright personality.
You can remember how a similar attempt by the Predators management to increase the attack on the eve of the playoffs failed in 2007, when Peter Forsberg himself came to Tennessee … goaltender Mike Smith, confidently won in five matches and reached the conference finals, the course and result of which, in the light of recent events, is absolutely impossible to predict.
East
New York Rangers (1) – New Jersey Devils (6)
Head to head: +3 – 3 (4:1, 3:4, 0:1, 2:0, 1: 4, 4:2)
“Washington”, entered under the new coach Dale Hunter in a new era, yet laid down his arms in the fight for the Stanley Cup. But, nevertheless, the team performed more than worthy and gave the fans 14 unforgettable matches with the strongest rivals: “Boston” and the New York “Rangers”.
Alexander Ovechkin, Brayden Holtby and company did their best, but the Blueshirts won the two most dramatic second round bouts. De facto, they predetermined the outcome of the series.
In the third game, an accurate shot by Marian Gaborik in the third overtime forced the capitulation of a brilliantly played young goaltender of the Capitals, and in the fifth, Washington was let down by the protagonist of the seventh game with the Bears, Joel Ward, who received a double minor penalty in the last minute. As a result, the highest paid hockey player of the current NHL season, Brad Richards, equalized the score 8 seconds (!) before the final siren, and at the very beginning of extra time, Mark Staal again realized the numerical advantage. “Rangers” not only seized the strategic initiative in this confrontation, but also received a significant psychological handicap, which has not been missed.
#ntright#The Philadelphia-New Jersey series, yet another battle within the Atlantic Division, turned out to be the strangest of all. The first game, in which the opponents showed hockey of the highest quality, and the initiative constantly changed hands, ended with two goals scored by Daniel Brier in overtime.
The referees rightly canceled the first of them (the Pilots forward sent a projectile into the goal with his skate), but the second put an end to the game. It would seem that the Flyers could not even dream of a better start to the series, but then all the air seemed to be pumped out of the team …
The young squad, inspired to crush the star “Pittsburgh” in the attack, literally stopped and could not recover until the end of the series. The creative genius of Claude Giroud only reminded of himself from time to time, Jaromir Jagr moved around the court with difficulty and did not actually threaten Martin Brodeur’s goal, his counterpart Ilya Bryzgalov continued to make mistakes, and the Black-and-Orange defenders clearly could not cope with the high pressure that they imposed by opponents.
Given the opportunity to dictate the course of the game, the “Devils” took full advantage of the superiority in physical fitness, and won four matches in a row. Compared to the Rangers, Peter DeBour’s team spent significantly less energy on the second-round series of the playoffs, but time will tell whether this will be a decisive factor in determining the finalist from the East.
We revive the speedometer from the subway train that has gone down in history / Sudo Null IT News
Greetings to all!
Those who have lived in Moscow for a long time will surely remember metro trains of the Yauza type. Although they caused the most controversial opinions among both passengers and metro workers, it can be said with confidence that for their time in our country they were unique.
So, in today’s article we will try to launch a part of the dashboard from the now disappeared model of the subway train. Let’s find out how it all works and works. As usual, there will be a lot of interesting things.
❯ The bottom line is
Many of the residents of Moscow (where such trains were operated) managed to find them in operation. Appeared in the nineties, these trains have worked on the line for more than twenty years.
Many modifications were released, among which were both experienced and modern. Later, their developments were used to create later cars – “Rusich” and “Yubileiny”, and the RA1 rail bus also has a body of a similar design.
In the summer of 2019, they were written off without exception, thereby completing their passenger operation. Only one copy remained, which they wanted to leave for the Museum of Moscow Transport.
❯ Product overview
The more unique the copy that I got. A rare detail from a train that has already irretrievably gone down in history – what could be cooler?
And I got a digital speedometer from the driver’s cab. He is the display unit ALS-ARS.
In the open spaces, we managed to find a photo of the driver’s console (on the KDPV, although it is in better quality, it has a different modification). The black panel with scales is the same display unit.
And here is my copy. The device is in excellent condition, except for a layer of dust and scuffs.
The characteristic smell of the subway is also available.
So, on the front there are three LED scales of three colors: red shows the maximum speed, green – current, yellow – warning. To the right is an LED indicator that displays the current speed, an acceleration scale and an indicator of the direction of movement.
There is nothing interesting on the back and sides, only holes for ventilation.
On the right side there are 2PM connectors marked as X1 and X2. It can be assumed that one of them serves for power, and the other for control. Well, we’ll figure it out soon.
Type plate. My block is number 13.
❯ Internals
Initially, I had no idea which way to approach this thing. On the Internet, we managed to find documentation for the ALS-ARS system of the Yauza and Rusich cars, but the principles of operation of its individual blocks were not reflected there. So the only thing left to do was to experiment.
What do we do when an interesting piece of iron comes into our hands? That’s right: we understand it.
To disassemble it is necessary to unscrew two screws on the left (one of which is under the seal, which I have crumbled for a long time) and six on the side of the connectors (along the perimeter of the case). After that, the entire metal casing can be easily removed.
There are three boards waiting for us inside. Conventionally, they can be divided into a control board, a driver board and an indication board.
There are wire harnesses coming from the connectors.
To separate these boards, remove the six flathead screws holding them together. Pictured is the bottom plate. Alas, it was not possible to shoot from a different angle, otherwise the wires interfere. But later I will try to compensate for this with more detailed photos.
Intermediate board.
And here is the indication board.
Decimal numbers on boards.
First of all, we are interested, of course, in the lowest board.
It is to her that the wiring harnesses from the connectors come. And this means that it is necessary to investigate it first of all.
On the board there is a KR1830BE31 microcontroller, next to it is a memory chip from Atmel. In general, these two microcircuits are the only two plastic cases in the entire device. Everything else is cermet. We find power and ground along the power lines of the microcontroller. They are indeed brought to a small connector, as I thought.
Well, let’s try to turn it on, shall we?
❯ First start
To begin with, we need a mating part from the connector. In this case – 2RMD18KUN4G5V1. The marking on the block part is erased, so I chose it purely by size and number of contacts. The second connector has a model 2RMDT30B24Sh5V1V. The counterpart to it is 2RMD30KPN24G5V1. In general, it is not necessary to use exactly these, they have several modifications, the differences of which (temperature resistance, shielding, straight or angled pipe) are not significant for us.
So, solder the wires and apply five volts. And nothing. Some examination of the circuit revealed another thick wire coming from one of the pins of this connector. Applying five volts to it did the trick. As you can understand, one line is used to power the electronics, the other is for indication.
Unit immediately after power up. You can see a kind of self-testing – all scales are lit.
After a second, the current speed and acceleration are extinguished. That’s it, nothing else is happening. Well, already some result.
The pinout of the small connector is thus:
- Power indication
- Earth
- Logic supply
- Earth
To start, you need to parallelize the power and ground lines and apply five volts to them.
❯ Interface
Of course, I wanted to somehow manage it all. And this means that you need to figure out what interface this thing works on and what it wants in general.
Inspection of the bottom board revealed the presence of two very similar circuits on 3OD129A optocouplers. The outputs of the LED were connected directly to the external connector.
An attempt to close the photodiode leads was successful – something has changed on the scales. Apparently, the input signal is given here. It remains only to understand what it is.
Connect a signal source through a 220 ohm resistor. But the device did not care about a simple rectangular signal – the scales only flickered. It appears to be some kind of interface.
“Most likely, this is a UART …” – I thought. With these thoughts, I connected the block to the serial port and began to try to send something at different speeds, simultaneously observing the color music on the scales.
Something meaningful was achieved at a speed of 9600 baud – sending a couple of hundred bytes 0x01 caused the ignition of one segment on the acceleration scale. 0x02 was able to light two.
That’s it, there was nothing else.
By the way, it should be remembered that the optocoupler is connected directly to the connector, so it is necessary to use an external resistor, otherwise the device may die.
❯ Bringing scales to life
To test, I decided to send bytes sequentially from 0x00 to 0xFF. And it turned out to be a good decision – some changes became noticeable on the main scales. Then I sent the bytes already “targeted” – not in such large quantities and certain values. What made it more difficult was that, having received a byte, the panel immediately reacted to it, and did not wait until all the data arrived.
So, in the end, I came to the conclusion that I need to send something like:
<00h><00h><00h>
This gave some effect, but did not send the device into spacing.
Almost immediately, we managed to revive the green scale. The first byte of the packet is responsible for it. Every four units symbolize one division of the scale.
Then the yellow one succumbed. It turned out that the yellow and red ones work not for increasing, but for decreasing, that is, the maximum value means the scale is extinguished, and the minimum value is completely burning.
After poking a little more, I started the red one.
As a result, the format of the data packet turned out to be:
<00h><00h><00h> <00h><00h><00h> <00h><00h><00h>
❯ Acceleration
Now it’s time for acceleration. For a long time I tried to understand where its bytes were and even in vain attributed the same four to the end of the packet, to which the block simply went out. As a result, it turned out that the desired value is hidden in the sixth byte of the packet – on average between red and yellow. Thus, the true form of the data packet turned out to be:
<00h><00h><00h> <00h> <00h> <00h><00h><00h>
The value of this byte can lie in one of two ranges – 99-F5 – acceleration, 00-0F – deceleration.
The entire line cannot be illuminated at once. One byte corresponds to one division of the scale.
We try to send a packet, and here is the result:
❯ Indicators
As can be seen, during all the experiments, two LED indicators were off. And that means it’s time to try to revive them.
And first, let’s take a closer look at the indication board. To do this, we unscrew the screws around the perimeter of the front part and first remove the metal frame, and then the plexiglass plate with inscriptions. Here we are met by a bunch of LED bars, as well as two indicators. Everything is imported, no domestic ALSs with their lack of brightness.
The direction indicator deserves special attention. This is not just a light field, it is a matrix LED indicator. Initially, they were produced for use as sign-synthesizers, but for some reason it plays the role of a single one. What prevented me from putting two ordinary LEDs or two light fields, I don’t know.
Resistor assemblies mounted on the indication board.
❯ Indicators
Since it was not possible to reach the indicators via the serial port, it is logical to assume that they are controlled from the outside.
Two 514ID2 chips were found on the bottom board, which are drivers of seven-segment indicators. The call revealed that four data lines from each chip lead directly to the same 2PM. But here, too, not everything is so obvious: as it turned out, food is supplied to them separately. And it is displayed not on a small connector, but on a large one. This must also be taken into account when connecting. In fact, the circuit with seven-segment indicators is a separate independent circuit.
We try to apply some combination, and … the indicator comes to life! The indicators are controlled independently, that is, in total, eight wires are needed to connect them.
❯ Light field
It is the turn of the last element – the direction indicator.
And, as it turned out, it’s even easier with it – just pull one of the connector legs to the ground to make it work.
❯ Pinout
Now that the purpose of all contacts is known, the pinout of the control connector can also be determined. She ended up here like this:0003
- D0 first indicator
- D1 first indicator
- D2 first indicator
- D3 first indicator
- D0 second indicator
- D1 second indicator
- D2 second indicator
- D3 second indicator
- Forward
- back
- –
- –
- Housing
- –
- RX-
- RX+
- –
- –
- –
- 5 V (ind.)
- Land (ind.)
- –
- –
- –
❯ What’s wrong with all this?
Alas, in the course of searching for the package format, I encountered one problem that I could not solve.
