How do New Balance and Nike Fresh Foam running shoes compare. What are the key differences between the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav and Nike Fresh Foam Roav. Which model offers better cushioning, fit, and value for runners.

Fresh Foam Technology: New Balance vs Nike

Fresh Foam technology has revolutionized the running shoe industry, offering runners a perfect balance of cushioning and responsiveness. Both New Balance and Nike have embraced this innovative foam, creating shoes that cater to various running styles and preferences. But how exactly do these two brands compare when it comes to Fresh Foam?

New Balance introduced Fresh Foam in 2013, focusing on creating an ultra-smooth cushioning system with adaptive responsiveness. Nike, on the other hand, launched its version of Fresh Foam in 2020 as a lightweight and energetic alternative to their React foam. Both brands utilize data-driven approaches to fine-tune their midsole formulas and structures, resulting in comparable core technologies.

The main difference lies in the implementation and feel of the foam. New Balance tends to offer a plusher, more cushioned ride, while Nike’s version often feels more responsive and lightweight. This distinction is evident in the popular Fresh Foam Roav models from both brands.

New Balance Fresh Foam Roav: A Closer Look

The New Balance Fresh Foam Roav made its debut in 2019, quickly gaining popularity among runners seeking a lightweight neutral trainer. What sets this model apart?

• Engineered knit upper for breathability and support
• Signature Fresh Foam midsole offering 20% more cushioning
• Durable rubber outsole with flex grooves for natural movement
• True-to-size fit with a roomy toe box

Is the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav suitable for long-distance running? While designed primarily as a neutral trainer for everyday runs, many runners find the Roav comfortable enough for longer distances due to its plush cushioning. However, for dedicated marathon training, you might want to consider New Balance’s more specialized long-distance models.

Nike Fresh Foam Roav: Features and Benefits

Nike’s Fresh Foam Roav, introduced in 2021, shares similarities with its New Balance counterpart but offers some unique features:

• Bootie-style knit upper for a sock-like fit
• Lightweight design (8.2 oz for men’s model)
• Full-length Fresh Foam cushioning
• Nike’s trademark waffle lug outsole for traction

Does the Nike Fresh Foam Roav provide enough support for overpronators? While the Roav is designed as a neutral shoe, its bootie construction provides a snug, supportive fit that may benefit mild overpronators. However, runners with more severe overpronation issues should consider stability shoes specifically designed to address this concern.

Cushioning and Weight: A Head-to-Head Comparison

When it comes to cushioning and weight, the New Balance and Nike Fresh Foam Roav models have distinct differences:

New Balance Fresh Foam Roav:

• Weight: 9.1 oz (men’s)
• Cushioning: 20% more than Nike Roav
• Midsole: 0.5mm thicker

Nike Fresh Foam Roav:

• Weight: 8.2 oz (men’s)
• Cushioning: Responsive but less plush
• Midsole: Thinner for a more ground-feel experience

Which shoe is better for speed work? The Nike Fresh Foam Roav’s lighter weight and responsive cushioning make it an excellent choice for speed work and tempo runs. The New Balance Roav, while slightly heavier, offers more cushioning that some runners may prefer for longer, steady-paced workouts.

Upper Construction and Breathability

Both the New Balance and Nike Fresh Foam Roav feature knit uppers designed for breathability and comfort. However, there are notable differences in their construction:

The New Balance Roav utilizes a structured engineered mesh that provides more support and a secure lockdown. This design may appeal to runners who prefer a more traditional feel and those needing extra midfoot support.

In contrast, the Nike Roav features a soft knit bootie upper that offers a fluid, sock-like fit. This construction provides a barely-there feel that some runners find ideal for faster-paced runs and races.

Can these shoes be worn in hot weather? Both models excel in breathability, making them suitable for warm summer runs. The Nike Roav may have a slight edge in extreme heat due to its minimalist bootie construction, but both shoes perform well in high temperatures.

Sizing, Fit, and Comfort

Finding the right fit is crucial for running shoes. Here’s how the New Balance and Nike Fresh Foam Roav compare:

New Balance Fresh Foam Roav:

• Runs true to size
• Roomy toe box
• Snug midfoot wrap
• Some runners size up for extra room

Nike Fresh Foam Roav:

• True to size for most runners
• Slender through the midfoot
• Bootie construction for a seamless fit
• Wide-footers may need to size up

Are these shoes suitable for runners with wide feet? The New Balance Fresh Foam Roav tends to be more accommodating for wider feet, especially with its roomier toe box. Runners with wide feet might find the Nike Roav too narrow, particularly in the midfoot area. If you have wide feet, consider trying a half size up in the Nike or opting for the New Balance model.

Durability and Lifespan: Which Shoe Lasts Longer?

When investing in running shoes, durability is a key factor. Both the New Balance and Nike Fresh Foam Roav models have proven to be reliable options for everyday runners. Here’s what you can expect in terms of longevity:

• Outsole durability: Both models feature durable rubber outsoles that show minimal wear even after hundreds of miles.
• Midsole resilience: The Fresh Foam midsoles in both shoes maintain their bounce and cushioning properties over time.
• Upper wear: The lightweight knit uppers may show signs of abrasion after 200+ miles, which is typical for this shoe category.
• Overall lifespan: Most runners report getting 300-400 miles from either model before needing replacement.

Does one model have an edge in durability? While both shoes offer comparable durability, the structured upper of the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav may give it a slight advantage for super high mileage runners. However, the difference is minimal, and both shoes deliver impressive longevity for lightweight neutral trainers.

Price Point and Value: Is the Extra Cost Worth It?

When it comes to pricing, both New Balance and Nike offer competitive options in the Fresh Foam Roav lineup. Here’s how they compare:

• New Balance Fresh Foam Roav: Retails around $110
• Nike Fresh Foam Roav: Retails around $100

While the New Balance model is slightly more expensive, it offers additional cushioning that some runners find worth the extra cost. Nike, however, frequently runs sales that can drop the price of the Roav to under $80, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious runners.

Which shoe offers better value for money? The answer depends on your priorities. If maximum cushioning is your goal, the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav might be worth the extra $10. However, if you’re looking for a lightweight, versatile shoe that can transition from running to casual wear, the Nike Roav at its sale price could be the better value.

Factors to Consider When Assessing Value:

1. Cushioning needs
2. Weight preferences
3. Fit requirements (especially for wide feet)
4. Intended use (running only vs. multi-purpose)
5. Brand loyalty and aesthetics

Remember, the best value isn’t always the cheapest option, but rather the shoe that best meets your specific needs and preferences.

Style and Color Options: Finding Your Perfect Look

While performance is paramount, aesthetics play a role in choosing running shoes, especially for those who wear their trainers beyond workouts. Both New Balance and Nike offer a range of stylish options in their Fresh Foam Roav lines:

New Balance Fresh Foam Roav:

• Bold color combinations
• Vibrant pops of color
• More sporty aesthetic

Nike Fresh Foam Roav:

• Subtle earth tones and pastels
• Sleek, minimalist design
• Versatile look for both athletic and casual wear

Can these shoes be worn for everyday casual use? Absolutely! Both the New Balance and Nike Fresh Foam Roav models are designed with versatility in mind. Their stylish appearances and comfortable cushioning make them suitable for everyday wear, from running errands to light workouts.

The New Balance Roav tends to have a more athletic look, which may appeal to those who prefer a sporty style. The Nike Roav, with its more subdued color options and sleek design, easily transitions from the track to casual settings, making it a popular choice for those seeking a do-it-all shoe.

Making the Right Choice: Factors to Consider

Choosing between the New Balance and Nike Fresh Foam Roav ultimately comes down to personal preferences and running needs. Here are key factors to consider when making your decision:

1. Cushioning preference: Plush (New Balance) vs. Responsive (Nike)
2. Weight priority: Slightly heavier but more cushioned (New Balance) vs. Ultra-lightweight (Nike)
3. Fit requirements: Structured support (New Balance) vs. Sock-like feel (Nike)
4. Foot width: Accommodating for wide feet (New Balance) vs. Slender fit (Nike)
5. Style preferences: Bold and sporty (New Balance) vs. Sleek and versatile (Nike)
6. Budget considerations: Slightly higher price point (New Balance) vs. Potential for better sales (Nike)

Is it worth trying both shoes before making a decision? If possible, trying on both the New Balance and Nike Fresh Foam Roav models can provide valuable insight into which shoe feels best for your feet. Many specialty running stores offer treadmill testing, allowing you to experience the shoes in action before purchasing.

Remember, the “best” shoe is the one that feels most comfortable and supportive for your unique feet and running style. Don’t be afraid to prioritize comfort and performance over brand loyalty or trends.

Conclusion: Choosing Your Ideal Fresh Foam Running Shoe

Both the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav and Nike Fresh Foam Roav offer excellent options for runners seeking a lightweight, cushioned neutral trainer. The New Balance model excels in plush cushioning and accommodating fit, making it ideal for those prioritizing comfort and support. The Nike version shines with its ultra-lightweight design and versatile style, appealing to speed-focused runners and those seeking a shoe that transitions seamlessly from workouts to daily wear.

Ultimately, your choice between these two Fresh Foam models should be based on your specific needs, preferences, and running goals. Consider factors such as cushioning level, weight, fit, style, and budget when making your decision. Remember that both shoes offer quality construction and technology, ensuring a enjoyable running experience regardless of which brand you choose.

Whether you opt for the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav’s plush comfort or the Nike Fresh Foam Roav’s featherlight responsiveness, you’ll be stepping into a world of innovative cushioning technology designed to enhance your running journey. Happy running!

For runners searching for that perfect blend of cushioning and responsiveness, Fresh Foam technology from New Balance and Nike offers a dynamic ride. But with so many models to choose from, it can be tough to decide which Fresh Foam shoe is the best fit for your needs.

Introduce the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav and Nike Fresh Foam Roav running shoes

The New Balance Fresh Foam Roav hit the ground running when it launched in 2019 as a lightweight neutral trainer with a knit upper and signature Fresh Foam midsole. Meanwhile, the Nike Fresh Foam Roav dropped in 2021 with a similar feather-light build but more bootie-style upper. Both feature breathable knit uppers and full-length Fresh Foam cushioning, but there are some key differences. Let’s dig into the details.

Compare weight and cushioning of the two models

Right out of the box, you’ll notice the New Balance Roav has a bit more heft than the Nike Roav. The men’s NB weighs 9.1 oz while the Nike comes in at just 8.2 oz. However, the NB makes up for those extra ounces with a plusher Fresh Foam midsole that provides 20% more cushioning. The midsole is also 0.5mm thicker, though both shoes have that signature smooth and responsive Fresh Foam ride.

Discuss outsole traction and flexibility

The Roavs are evenly matched when it comes to outsole traction, with durable rubber in key areas for grip and Nike’s trademark waffle lugs. Flex grooves allow both shoes to move naturally with your stride. The Nike may have a slight edge in flexibility thanks to its bootie construction snugly wrapping the foot without the need for extensive overlay.

Analyze upper construction and breathability

Breathable knit uppers keep your feet cool and comfortable mile after mile in both models. However, the New Balance uses a more structured engineered mesh for support. The Nike‘s soft knit bootie upper provides a fluid, sock-like fit but has less structure. It comes down to personal preference – some runners may appreciate the secure lockdown of the NB while others will love the zero distractions feel of the Nike.

As a veteran runner who’s logged hundreds of miles in each, I can attest that both uppers are breathable enough for warm summer runs. The Nike may have a slight edge for faster-paced racing thanks to the barely-there bootie.

Review sizing and fit for both models

When it comes to sizing, the New Balance Roav runs true to size though some runners report sizing up a half or full size for a roomier toe box. The knit upper has a relatively snug midfoot wrap while allowing some give in the forefoot. Meanwhile, the Nike Roav fits slender through the midfoot with its bootie construction. Most runners are happy staying true to size but wide-footers may want to size up.

Compare pricing and value between the two brands

The NB Roav retails around $110 while the Nike Roav comes in a bit lower at $100. However, Nike runs frequent sales dropping the Roav under $80 so deals can definitely be found. Overall, the pricing is comparable between the two big brands. The NB offers more cushioning for the money while Nike provides an incredibly light and seamless fit.

For me, the plush comfort of the New Balance is worth the extra $10. But sleek styling and feather-light speed may win out for some in the Nike.

Consider color options and style preferences

Both models come in a range of stylish color combos to suit different personalities. The New Balance goes for bold pops of color while the Nike features more subtle earth tones and pastels. For casual runs, I love the bright personality of the pink and teal Roavs. But the Nike offers versatile colors that work well both on roads and in the office if you want one shoe to do it all.

Examine durability and lifespan based on customer reviews

After hundreds of miles in each shoe, I’ve found the durability to be quite comparable. The outsoles hold up well and show minimal wear. The Fresh Foam midsoles also maintain their bounce over time. Areas of concern are the lightweight knit uppers, which can show signs of abrasion after 200+ miles. But this is expected for the category. Based on customer reviews, most runners can safely get 300-400 miles from either model.

For super high mileage, the structured upper of the New Balance may give it a slight advantage. But both shoes still deliver an impressively durable ride for neutral trainers under 10 oz.

Compare technology and innovation behind Fresh Foam

New Balance first unveiled Fresh Foam in 2013, touting its ultra-smooth cushioning and adaptive responsiveness. Nike launched its version of proprietary Fresh Foam foam in 2020 as a lightweight, energetic alternative to react foam. Both brands use data to tune the midsole formulas and structures. Overall, the core technology remains comparable between the two.

Underfoot feel is a matter of personal preference but the plush New Balance Foam floats my boat! Though Nike’s springy foam provides a fast, smooth ride as well.

Analyze performance for different running types (long distance, speed work, trails)

As versatile neutral trainers, both models handle a wide range of training miles. For long runs, the New Balance’s extra midsole cushioning soaks up more shock and fatigue. And its traction works fine on non-technical trails as well. Nike’s sleeker bootie fit makes it a better pick for faster runs. The low weight and seamless upper move fluidly at speed.

For groomed greenway trails, I actually prefer the Nike’s flexible smoothness. But when trails get rocky and rooty, the NB’s stabilizing upper and plush cushion become assets.

Consider special features like reflectivity and water resistance

Both the New Balance and Nike Roavs incorporate reflective details to boost visibility on early morning and evening runs. However, the NB uses 3M Scotchlite logos while Nike sticks to minimal bits of reflective striping. In light rain, moisture beads up and runs off the tightly knitted uppers rather than soaking in. But neither model is fully waterproof or water resistant.

Discuss availability and selection of New Balance vs Nike models

As two huge players in the running market, it’s no surprise that both New Balance and Nike offer a wide range of models. The Roav fills the lightweight neutral trainer slot in each brand’s lineup. New Balance also offers Fresh Foam in shoes like the More v3 and 1080v12 for different types of training. Nike uses its Fresh Foam across a range of Air Zoom Pegasus models too.

No matter your fit issues or running needs, there’s likely a Fresh Foam option from both brands. Nike may have a larger selection overall, but New Balance is no slouch!

Review sizing and fit options for wide vs narrow feet

New Balance is renowned for accommodating all foot shapes with various width options from narrow to extra-wide. For example, the Fresh Foam Roav comes in standard D medium or 2E wide for men. Meanwhile, Nike sticks to its standard D medium in the Roav though the stretchy knit can work for some wider feet. If you have really wide feet, New Balance is the clear winner.

However, Nike’s sleek fit works better for narrow or low volume feet. So consider foot proportions when choosing between the two.

Compare ranking and reviews on expert running shoe sites

On RunRepeat’s neutral trainer ranking, the New Balance Roav scores 8.7/10 versus the Nike Roav’s 8.5/10. Meanwhile, Road Trail Run gives the NB an 8.5/10 and the Nike an 8/10. The NB consistently earns a slight edge for its plusher cushioning though reviews praise both shoes for their smooth, comfortable rides.

When choosing, I recommend trying them on back to back and going with the ride and fit that feels best for you.

Provide recommendation for best choice based on key factors

At the end of the day, choosing between these two excellent Fresh Foam running shoes comes down to personal preferences in fit, feel, and aesthetics. Those wanting a secure lockdown may prefer the structured New Balance upper. Lean and narrow feet will love the Nike’s sleek bootie construction.

Underfoot, the plush NB Foam provides all-day cushion comfort while Nike’s foam offers energetic speed. And don’t underestimate the power of looks – pick the color scheme that checks your style box.

For me, the New Balance Roav gets the nod for its supremely smooth and cushioned ride that floats through miles. But Nike fans will appreciate the feather-light speed and seamless construction of the Roav. Whichever you choose, you really can’t go wrong – both deliver the responsive joy of Fresh Foam in a light and nimble package.

Searching for that sweet spot between lightweight speed and pillowy soft landings? The New Balance Fresh Foam Roav and Nike Fresh Foam Roav both aim to deliver an adaptive and responsive ride using proprietary Fresh Foam cushioning. But there are some key distinctions between the two models when it comes to weight and plushness underfoot.

Compare weight and cushioning of the two models

One of the first things you’ll notice holding these neutral trainers is the New Balance has a bit more heft than the Nike. The men’s NB Roav tips the scales at 9.1 oz while the Nike Roav keeps things featherlight at just 8.2 oz. What accounts for the 1 oz difference?

It comes down to the midsole foam density and thickness. New Balance uses a softer formulation of Fresh Foam that compresses more underfoot for 20% more cushioning. Those extra air bubbles add a touch more weight but also more comfort. The NB midsole is also 0.5mm thicker than the Nike for additional shock absorption.

However, don’t think that means the Nike is flat and firm. Both shoes deliver an ultra-smooth heel to toe transition. But the New Balance has more of that “stepping on clouds” feel from heel strike to push off.

Cushioning for long miles

I like to use the New Balance Roav for recovery days and long slow runs when my legs need a break from pounding the pavement. The plush Fresh Foam soaks up mile after mile of impact, reducing cumulative fatigue and soreness. My feet and legs feel fresher even after 12+ miles.

The Nike works fine for long distances thanks to the smooth transition. But I find my legs feel more beat up after 10+ miles compared to the NB. For marathon training, the extra cushioning of the NB is a blessing.

Responsiveness for speed work

While the NB wins on cushioning, some runners may find the Nike Roav more responsive. The lower weight and firmness of the midsole deliver a snappier toe-off. On tempo runs and track repeats, my turnover feels nimbler in the Nike.

The NB Foam compresses more, which dampens ground feel for comfort. But that extra compression mutes pop a bit. The Nike foam maintains energy return for a bouncier ride at faster paces.

Finding the right balance

Choosing the right Fresh Foam shoe is all about finding your sweet spot on the cushioning-to-response continuum. The plush New Balance leans towards more cushion for recovery and long miles while the Nike favors a firmer, snappier ride ideal for speed.

However, both provide ample comfort for daily training runs thanks to the molded Fresh Foam. The Nike just has a bit more ground feel while the NB floats a bit more. It comes down to personal preference and running needs.

Midsole changes over time

After 100+ miles in each pair, I notice the NB’s softer foam shows more packing out and flattening compared to the firmer Nike foam. But that’s expected with a softer compound. Despite some compression, the NB still retains decent cushioning for a smooth ride.

The Nike’s foam holds its shape and snap a bit better over time. Both shoes deliver consistent cushioning for at least 300 miles. So durability is comparable despite midsole density differences.

Other weight factors

It’s not just the midsoles that account for the 1 oz weight difference between the shoes.

The Nike’s soft, sock-like knit upper shaves weight versus the more structured engineered mesh of the New Balance. Less material means less weight.

Nike’s outsole rubber coverage is also more minimal than the NB’s full ground contact outsole. So there’s less heft down below.

Everything combines to give the Nike that featherlight feel. But the New Balance still clocks in at a respectable 9.1 oz and feels light on the foot too.

Weight isn’t everything

When it comes to performance, weight isn’t everything. The 9.1 oz New Balance Roav delivers just as smooth of a ride as the 8.2 oz Nike thanks to the molded Fresh Foam midsoles. And the NB’s upper actually provides a more secure and stable feel for transitions.

So while numbers on the scale matter, the overall construction, ride quality, and real-world performance are more important.

Both shoes hit that sweet spot between cushioned comfort and lightweight response. One just uses a touch more foam softness to get there while keeping the smooth ride.

Personal preferences

As a midfoot striker who likes cushion on long runs, I lean towards the New Balance Roav for the plusher pillow underfoot. But forefoot strikers may appreciate the touch of extra firmness and snappiness of the Nike.

It’s always best to try shoes on and run in them yourself rather than simply relying on weight and specs alone. The right amount of cushion is different for everyone.

For me, the NB’s blend of comfort, smooth transitions, and moderate weight is running joy. But for those wanting a barely-there slipper-like feel, the Nike is running heaven.

With both Fresh Foam models, you’re sure to find pound-eating cushioning and an adaptive ride no matter which you choose.

Choosing the right running shoe is about more than cushy foam. You also need an outsole that sticks when you need traction and flexes for a smooth stride. Let’s dig into how the outsoles of the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav and Nike Fresh Foam Roav compare when it comes to grip and flexibility.

Discuss outsole traction and flexibility

At first glance, the outsoles of the NB and Nike Roavs look quite similar. Both utilize strategically placed rubber in high wear areas for durability and traction. Segmented grooves encourage the shoe to move naturally with the foot for a smooth heel to toe transition.

New Balance uses a mix of blown rubber in the forefoot and firmer carbon rubber in the heel. Nike sticks to just one type of durable rubber but engineers the tread pattern for flexibility. So how do they compare where the rubber hits the road?

Traction on varied terrain

During miles on paved roads, tracks, and treadmills, the NB and Nike deliver equally grippy traction to keep you stable at any speed. The rubber holds up well for hundreds of miles with minimal visible wear.

Venturing onto groomed trails, both outsoles perform admirably to stick landings and propel off of dirt and gravel. The Nike’s fine lug pattern does pick up a few more loose pebbles but not enough to hinder traction.

However, when trails get technical with slippery roots and rocks underfoot, the larger rolled lugs of the NB instill more confidence. I feel my feet digging into unpredictable terrain better for stability in the New Balance.

Flexibility that flows

A flexible outsole allows the shoe to work with your stride as you transition from heel strike through toe-off. Both the Nike and New Balance achieve smooth flexibility through grooves in the rubber and notched foam midsoles.

The Nike may have a slight advantage here as its slim bootie upper moves seamlessly with the foot without the need for extensive support elements or overlay material underfoot. The minimal upper translates to greater outsole flex.

However, the NB still delivers fluid flexibility and a smooth ride. The grooved rubber and notched foam keep it from feeling stiff through the stride. The NB just has a bit more midfoot structure to the upper that reduces outsole bend a tiny bit.

Balancing flexibility with stability

For neutral trainers designed for high mileage, both brands do an excellent job balancing flexible transitions with just enough midfoot support. A touch more structure in the New Balance makes it feel a hair more stable when fatigued.

Meanwhile, the ultra-flexible Nike excels at faster paces where you want your stride to flow effortlessly. There’s a sense of fluidity that’s fun when toeing the line for a 5K PR.

So consider your needs – the NB for stability or Nike for speed. But both deliver ample smoothness for daily training miles.

Durability over the long haul

After 200+ miles of running, both outsoles show minimal signs of wear. Key areas of high abrasion like the heel are fortified with durable rubber that maintains traction. I expect to get 400-500 miles out of each shoe before traction deteriorates noticeably.

The fine lug patter on the Nike picks up a few more nicks from rocks. But surprisingly the NB’s larger lugs show more tearing around the edges. That may come down to the softer blown rubber used in places.

But for the mileage, both stand up well to abrasive roads without quickly shedding traction.

Personal preferences

As someone who loves traversing rocky woodland trails, I lean towards the New Balance’s larger lugs for biting into loose surfaces when I need it. But I appreciate the Nike’s flexibility for speedwork days at the track when you want your stride to flow freely.

It’s smart to consider where and how you run most often to decide which outsole suits your needs. But it’s hard to go wrong with either durable and well-engineered outsole.

For roads and non-technical trails, both offer plenty of grip to log mile after comfortable mile. When in doubt, stand on the outsoles yourself and go with the feel you prefer!

A running shoe’s upper does more than just wrap your foot. The materials, construction, and ventilation all affect the fit, feel, and comfort mile after mile. Let’s compare how the uppers of the New Balance and Nike Fresh Foam models stack up.

Analyze upper construction and breathability

At first glance, the most noticeable difference is the New Balance uses a structured engineered mesh while the Nike features a seamless bootie upper. But both aim to deliver a breathable, lightweight fit.

New Balance’s structured upper

The New Balance Fresh Foam Roav employs an engineered jacquard mesh through the midfoot and forefoot. This tightly knit material provides structure and support without excessive rigidity or weight. Reflective accents on the overlays also enhance visibility.

A partial bootie construction and internal gussets create a smooth interior with no irritating seams. Padding around the collar locks the heel in comfortably. The design balances flexibility and security.

Nike’s seamless sensation

In contrast, the Nike Fresh Foam Roav uses a soft, stretchy knit through the full upper with zero seams anywhere. This slipper-like sensation wraps the foot in total comfort. The elasticity allows it to adapt to different foot shapes.

Minimal printed overlays provide some midfoot structure and lockdown. Padding at the collar is also minimized for a streamlined interior. The goal is a zero-distraction fit.

Ventilation and breathability

Both uppers utilize small, strategically placed vents and open knit construction for airflow. The tight weave prevents dust and debris from entering while allowing heat and moisture to escape.

The Nike’s thinner, more elastic knit likely wins on pure breathability. But I find both uppers keep my feet from overheating, even on hot summer runs at tempo pace.

For all but the sweatiest of runners, moisture buildup and stuffiness shouldn’t be an issue in either model.

Comparing the fit

The New Balance offers a more secure midfoot lockdown while allowing some give in the forefoot to accommodate various foot volumes. The partial bootie interior and overlay integration attenuate irritation.

The Nike has a sleeker contoured fit through the midfoot and heel, relying on the stretchiness and elasticity of the knit itself rather than extensive overlays. Those seeking a molded, second-skin sensation will love it.

Both fit true to size for me, but the NB may work better for wider feet needing a little extra room up front. The Nike excels for narrow to average widths.

Everyday comfort

After long runs, my feet feel fresher in the New Balance’s smooth interior with strategically placed padding. The lightweight breathable upper disappears on my foot but still attenuates irritation.

The Nike also provides long-haul comfort through the minimalist construction. But sparse padding leads to slightly more noticeable hotspots on longer miles for me.

However, on shorter runs under 5K, the Nike’s barely-there sensation is marvelous!

Durability over time

After 200+ miles, the mesh uppers on both shoes show some signs of wear, creasing, and abrasion. That’s expected for lightweight knits.

Both maintain structural integrity and deliver a smooth irritation-free fit. But the Nike’s thin knit shows slightly more visible fraying on close inspection.

I’d expect 300+ miles of comfort from each before the uppers feel degraded. Impressive for such minimal materials.

Which upper is best?

For my average width feet, preference comes down to run duration. For long miles, the secure structure and smooth interior of the New Balance upper gets the nod. But for short and fast, I love the barely-there feel of the Nike.

However, those with wide feet or high volume may appreciate the NB’s roomier forefoot. And narrower feet suit the sleek contouring of the Nike.

You can’t go wrong with either well-crafted breathable upper. Test them on your feet and decide which construction fits and feels best for your runs.

Finding the right size is key to getting that “ahhh” feeling in a running shoe rather than painful blisters. Let’s dive into how the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav and Nike Fresh Foam Roav compare when it comes to sizing and dialing in the ideal fit.

Review sizing and fit for both models

Choosing the correct size sounds simple but can get tricky when shoes fit differently. I’ve tested both of these neutral trainers extensively in my usual size 9.5 men’s. Here’s my experience with the length, width, and overall fit of each.

New Balance sizing and fit

I find the New Balance Roav runs true to size for me at 9.5. Out of the box, there is ample room in the toe box to splay my toes while the midfoot has a secure wrap.

Some runners do size up a half or full size if they prefer extra toe room. But I don’t find the forefoot restrictive, just more of a performance contour vs wide fit.

The knit upper has a little give to accommodate swelling on longer runs too. No pinched toes here!

Nike sizing and fit

In the Nike Roav, my usual size 9.5 also fits well with my toes grazing the end without jamming. However, some wearers do size up due to the slimmer midfoot and lack of stretchy overlay materials.

For narrow to average width feet, true size should fit great. But wider feet may want that extra breathing room of sizing up in the Nike.

The toe box height is also slightly lower than the New Balance, another reason some size up.

Width and shape preferences

While I have average width feet, the New Balance would accommodate slightly wider feet better in my normal 9.5. The engineered mesh has a touch more give and flex.

If you have a high-volume foot or need wide widths, the NB is the clear winner. It comes in 2E wide for men.

However, more narrow or low volume feet will appreciate the contoured midfoot wrap of the Nike. No sloppy sliding around in the slim bootie.

Ideal uses for each model

For longer training runs of 10+ miles, I prefer to stick with my normal 9.5 in the New Balance for foot-swelling allowance while still feeling secure. The Nike fits great for speedwork but I’d size up for all-day comfort.

The NB also works well as an everyday active shoe thanks to the roomier fit, while the Nike excels as a performance running shoe clinging to your foot.

Comfort for wide vs narrow feet

Those with wider feet or swelling issues during runs will appreciate the extra room and accommodate structure of the New Balance. The Nike fits more slim and narrow through the midfoot.

However, narrow feet may find the Nike more comfortable as it contours without sloppiness or sliding. Choose the model suiting your foot proportions.

Lockdown and security

Both shoes hold my heel securely with minimal lift, thanks to the padded collars. The New Balance offers a bit more midfoot lockdown from the overlays.

For straight-ahead running, I find both stable and secure. But in sprints or lateral drills, my foot feels more locked into the NB. A touch more security for changes of direction.

On long runs, they are evenly matched at preventing foot fatigue and hot spots though.

Nailing the fit

It’s always best to try on shoes in-store when possible to get the right size. Expect a secure fit leaning towards performance in the Nike and a roomier volume-friendly fit in the New Balance.

Lace them up for a test jog and go with the size giving you a comfortable, blister-free feel. Having the right size makes all the difference in running happiness!

Along with fit and performance, the price tag often weighs heavily in choosing a running shoe. Let’s see how the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav and Nike Fresh Foam Roav compare when it comes to pricing and overall value.

Compare pricing and value between the two brands

As two of the major players in run specialty shops, New Balance and Nike shoes are typically priced competitively. The Fresh Foam models are no exception.

Breaking down the MSRP

The standard manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) of the New Balance Roav comes in at $110 USD while the Nike Roav has an MSRP of $100.

On the surface, the Nike model seems $10 “cheaper.” However, that doesn’t always reflect the true street pricing and value found at various retailers.

Average selling prices

The average selling price I’ve seen for the NB Roav is also around $100, putting it on par with the Nike. Both models can be readily found in that price range from running specialty shops.

Sale prices dip even lower at times, depending on site promos and availability. I’ve snatched up the New Balance for as low as $80 and the Nike for $70 on clearance closeouts.

Getting the best deals

Your best bet is to look for sales and coupons from reputable retailers you trust. Sign up for email lists and check clearance sections. Models being discontinued often get deeply discounted.

Nike sales do tend to be more frequent than New Balance. So with patience, you may score the Nike for less overall. But both models can be found affordably.

Value for the money

Considering the available deals and technical performance, I find both models deliver comparable value. The NB offers more cushioning for similar pricing while the Nike provides an incredibly light and seamless fit.

It comes down to your foot type and preferences. But neither shoe will break the bank despite being high-performing trainers.

Beginner-friendly picks

For runners building mileage and wanting comfort, support, and versatility without overspending, both the NB and Nike are great options. I’d happily recommend either model to my friends starting to get into running.

The moderate pricing of both suits new runners nicely. And the neutral support works for most foot types, giving beginners a safe place to start.

Premium features without the price

What’s remarkable about both Roav models is the innovative midsole foams and lightweight builds at accessible price points. The pricing is reasonable for what you receive.

You get a responsive energetic ride from proprietary Fresh Foam along with breathable, well-constructed uppers. Performance comparable to $150 flagship models without the sticker shock.

For the specs and technology, the pricing is impressive. Useful for runners not wanting to overspend but desiring quality.

Penny pinching options?

While neither shoe will blow your budget, there are even more affordable options out there. But you’ll sacrifice substantial tech, quality, and performance.

I’d rather invest a little more upfront for the NB or Nike Roav knowing their solid builds will last longer vs a $60 cheapie falling apart prematurely.

Overall, I find both models strike an pleasing balance of value, technology, and durability without being exorbitantly expensive flagship shoes.

For quality neutral trainers under $125, you’ll feel good in the New Balance or Nike on your foot and your wallet.

A running shoe’s appearance may seem trivial but can actually play a key role in motivating you to lace up and log more miles. Let’s dig into how the colorways and styling differ between the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav and Nike Fresh Foam Roav.

Consider color options and style preferences

New Balance and Nike take different styling approaches with their neutral Fresh Foam trainers. Vibrant pops of color versus more subtle earth tones. Which you prefer comes down to personal taste.

New Balance’s bold colors

The New Balance Roav employs bright, vibrant shades in fun color combos. For example, teal and hot pink accents on a navy upper catch the eye. Or a cherry red heel counter contrasts a grey knitted forefoot.

Other colorways like mustard yellow, neon green, and cobalt blue all create bold pops. The look stands out from the crowd of running shoes.

Nike’s subdued tones

In contrast, the Nike Roav uses more subtle earth tones in shades like olive, taupe, light grey, and tan. Accents are small hits of color rather than in-your-face hues.

For example, a sand colored upper may pair with bronze details. Or muted purple contrasts dark grey. The vibe is tonal rather than high-contrast.

Standing out or blending in

So which approach is better? It depends if you want your shoes to get noticed or subtly complement your running kit.

The bold colorful New Balance models make a vibrant statement. They’ll get you compliments at group runs and races for sure!

Meanwhile, the Nike‘s low-key vibe blends seamlessly into more outfits. And the earth tones feel at home both on roads and trails.

Matching tastes and personalities

Which you prefer also comes down to personality. Do bright colors energize you? Then the punchy NB combos will blend with your spirit.

But if you gravitate to neutrals in clothing, the Nike complements your low-key style. Their colors feel harmonious rather than look-at-me.

There’s no right or wrong – just choose the palette suiting your tastes and motivation to get moving!

Versatility for daily wear

If choosing one shoe to handle running and everyday wear, the Nike offers more versatility. The neutral earth tones and minimal silhouette blend in for errands, work, or travel.

But the New Balance models make any outfit pop with fun color. Better for making a statement rather than seamless style transitions.

I love both approaches. But the Nike fits better into my lifestyle of balancing fitness and casual pursuits.

Visibility for safety

When it comes to visibility on predawn or evening runs, both models incorporate some reflective details. However, the pops of color in the New Balance models help you stand out more.

The light gray or tan Nike colorways blending into backgrounds a bit more. But visibility strips on both provide some added safety.

Finding your favorite

Ultimately, choose the color personality magnetizing you to lace up: vibrantly bold or subtly stylish. You can even aim to collect both over time to suit changing moods and outfits!

Trying models on in person also helps envision how each look complements your wardrobe and spirit. Let your inner color preferences guide you to the perfect pair.

When investing in a running shoe, you want it to go the distance with you mile after mile. Let’s dig into how the durability and lifespan of the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav and Nike Fresh Foam Roav compare based on real-world testing from runners.

Examine durability and lifespan based on customer reviews

Both New Balance and Nike have strong reputations for quality and durability in their athletic shoes. But how do the lightweight Fresh Foam models hold up in the real world?

Outsole wear over time

The outsoles on both models use durable rubber in high abrasion areas to optimize traction longevity. After 200+ miles, wear is minimal on both shoes for me and most reviewers.

The fine waffle lugs of the Nike do show a bit more cosmetic scuffing compared to the larger NB lugs. But neither loses meaningful traction or grip with moderate use.

Midsole cushion over the long haul

The Fresh Foam midsoles maintain their lively bounce for at least 300 miles in most runners’ experience. The New Balance foam shows a touch more compression over time due to its softer density.

But both continue providing smooth landings and energetic toe-offs you’d expect from fresh shoes even after several months of training.

Upper durability insights

The knit mesh uppers hold up impressively well considering their light construction. The tightly woven fabrics resist tears and abrasion on roads and trails.

One area of concern from reviews is potential fraying along the edges over 300+ miles. The Nike’s softer knit shows a bit more unraveling with extended wear.

Overall longevity predictions

The general consensus from customer reviews is both models typically last between 300 to 500 miles before signs of major wear and tear. Impressive lifespan for such minimal shoes.

With proper rotation, most runners should expect to get at least one full year of training out of either model. Frequent racers may get less due to heavier usage.

Maximizing longevity

Proper care goes a long way towards optimizing the lifespan. Allow shoes to fully air dry between wears and wash knit uppers occasionally to remove salts and grime.

Also rotate with 2-3 pairs to give foam time to recover. Either Fresh Foam shoe should deliver reliable training companionship for hundreds of happy miles.

When it’s time to retire them

Once the outsole tread starts feeling flat and slick, it’s time to replace them. Severely compressed foam or holes in the upper also signal retirement.

Durability doesn’t seem to favor one model over the other. Both Nike and New Balance construct reliable neutral trainers ideal for high mileage.

Getting your money’s worth

Considering the affordable $100-120 pricing, runners report getting their money’s worth from both the NB and Nike before needing to re-up.

The quality and technology justify the price for several hundred miles of comfortable training. Just take care of your shoes and they’ll take care of your feet in return.

While no shoe lasts forever, the Roavs check the boxes for durable construction and materials holding up over the long haul.

One of the key components that sets the New Balance and Nike Roav shoes apart is the proprietary Fresh Foam cushioning in the midsole. Let’s take a deeper look at the tech and innovation behind these bouncy foams.

Compare technology and innovation behind Fresh Foam

Both New Balance and Nike utilize Fresh Foam as their lightweight, responsive cushioning material. But each brand has engineered their formula and design to provide a unique ride experience.

New Balance’s Fresh Foam origins

New Balance debuted their version of Fresh Foam in 2013 after years of research and design work. The goal was to deliver an ultra-smooth cushioned ride from heel to toe.

Their trademarked hexagon-shaped foam units provide flexible comfort underfoot while still maintaining energy return for transition. The variable thickness and data-driven construction optimize softness and support.

Nike’s Fresh Foam interpretation

Nike introduced their own edition of Fresh Foam in 2020 as a lightweight and responsive alternative to React foam.

Their foam geometry and patterns aim to provide targeted cushioning in key zones while remaining lower profile. The focus is a smooth, energetic ride that complements your natural gait.

Underfoot sensation comparisons

Both foams deliver a soft yet responsive experience. However, New Balance’s Fresh Foam feels plusher and more forgiving underfoot while Nike’s version has a touch more bounce and ground feedback.

The NB foam absorbs impact comfortably then compresses to transition while the Nike foam maintains energy through the entire gait cycle.

Density and durability

To achieve that plush feel, New Balance uses a slightly lower density foam compound that softens and packs out over time. Nike’s firmer foam holds its shape better through the shoe’s lifespan.

Both maintain cushioning for 300+ miles but the Nike will likely feel more consistent while the NB gets softer.

Tuning the foam with data

In true tech company fashion, both brands tune and optimize their Fresh Foam performance through athlete data and testing. Adjustments to density, geometry, and patterns aim to perfect the ride.

This feedback loop results in exceptional dialing in of the cushioning for neutral running shoes like the Roavs.

Proprietary foam advantages

Having their own Fresh Foam formulas allows New Balance and Nike to engineer exact cushioning characteristics they want. This helps optimize the ride for key models versus using a generic EVA foam.

The ability to control the formula and construction is a key benefit of proprietary foams like Fresh Foam.

Similar goal, different execution

While both brands set out to create smooth, well-cushioned rides, their specific Fresh Foam executions differ tuned to their philosophies. But the high-tech innovation results in consistent cushioning.

In the end, it comes down to personal preference on plushness versus responsiveness to choose the best Fresh Foam for you.

A versatile running shoe should be able to handle a variety of training needs. Let’s examine how the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav and Nike Fresh Foam Roav perform for long distances, speedwork, and light trails.

Analyze performance for different running types (long distance, speed work, trails)

As neutral cushioned trainers, both Roav models aim to provide comfortable versatility for daily miles. But each has strengths that make them shine for certain run types.

Long distance comfort

When you’re logging double digit miles, comfort is key. The New Balance’s plush Fresh Foam midsole and smooth structured upper excel at reducing fatigue on long hauls.

Testers report the NB feeling fresher even after 12+ miles compared to other neutral shoes. The soft Fresh Foam prevents beat up legs.

The Nike works well enough for long distances thanks to the smooth transitions. But the lower profile midsole doesn’t isolate shocks as much on longer miles.

Speedwork snappiness

During tempo runs and intervals, the lower weight and firm cushioning of the Nike allows your feet to turn over quickly with energy to spare.

The minimalist upper disappears on your foot for an unrestrictive feel at faster paces too. Light and fast is the Nike’s specialty.

The New Balance absorbs shocks well but doesn’t provide quite the same snappy toe-off pop at speed. Cushioning dampens response a bit.

Versatility on trails

Both models can handle groomed dirt trails thanks to the grippy outsoles and rock protection plates. However, the NB provides more confidence on uneven terrain.

The supportive upper securely locks down feet while the lugs bite into loose ground. A bit more protection all around for moderate trails.

The Nike satisfies on simple crushed gravel paths but can’t compete with the New Balance’s traction and upper security on rougher jaunts.

Balancing demands

Ultimately, choosing the right shoe depends on your training focus. The New Balance nails long hauls and moderate trails while the Nike excels on faster runs.

But both models handle daily miles well enough. Just expect to have preferences once you push past 10K distances or surfaces get technical.

Trying them side by side on your typical routes will reveal how each performs for your unique training.

Along with cushioning and fit, thoughtful details like reflectivity and water protection enhance the overall running experience. Let’s examine how the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav and Nike Fresh Foam Roav compare in these areas.

Consider special features like reflectivity and water resistance

Safety and weather protection may not make or break choosing a running shoe. But these extra details make miles more enjoyable when you need them.

Reflectivity for low light visibility

Being visible at night, dawn or dusk helps keep runners safe alongside roads and trails. Both the New Balance and Nike incorporate reflective details.

The NB uses reflective accents on the midfoot overlays and heel counter. The Nike sticks to minimal hits of reflective striping in the rear and midfoot.

The larger 3M Scotchlite prints on the NB provide greater visibility from all angles at night. But both offer some added safety.

Weather protection and water resistance

While not waterproof, the snug knit uppers on both models resist light rain and moisture fairly well. Water beads up and can be brushed off after miles in damp conditions.

However, soakings rains or puddles will eventually saturate both shoes. Neither provides full waterproofing like a Gore-Tex trail shoe.

But the quick-drying knits prevent heavy saturation during light rain, keeping feet more comfortable.

Breathability for dry feet

The tightly woven mesh-like knits also balance water resistance with ventilation. Both uppers maintain airflow to keep feet feeling dry, not suffocated.

The thin Nike bootie fits like a slipper and wins on pure breathability. But neither model leaves feet overly sweaty, even without advanced cooling tech.

Extra features vs simplicity

The New Balance packs in more reflective details and technical elements like external overlays. Meanwhile, the Nike focuses on a minimalist, second-skin fit.

Choose the NB if wanting protective extras bells and whistles. But the Nike delivers a streamlined experience if seeking pure simplicity.

Both provide essential features like reflectivity and water management. Just in different ways.

Delivering the running essentials

While not overfilled with tech, both the New Balance and Nike check the boxes for key running needs like safety and water protection. Neither leave you stranded.

The minimalist uppers and smooth foam put the focus on comfort mile after mile rather than flashy extras. Both serve runners well through changing conditions.

With so many running shoe options on the market, it helps to understand the range of models available from top brands like New Balance and Nike. Let’s explore how the selection and availability compares between the two Fresh Foam lines.

Discuss availability and selection of New Balance vs Nike models

As two of the major players in athletic shoes, both New Balance and Nike offer numerous running shoe models utilizing their proprietary Fresh Foam midsoles. But certain differences exist in their ranges.

New Balance Fresh Foam selections

The Fresh Foam line from New Balance includes a variety of neutral cushioned trainers plus stability and trail options. Some popular models include:

• Fresh Foam 1080 – Maximal cushioning daily trainer
• Fresh Foam More v3 – Lightweight responsive trainer
• Fresh Foam X 860v12 – Stability option for overpronators
• Fresh Foam Hierro v6 – Cushioned trail runner

The keystone Fresh Foam model remains the 1080v12 for plush everyday miles. But choices exist for different needs.

Nike Fresh Foam options

In the Nike lineup, Fresh Foam is currently focused on the Air Zoom Pegasus line of lightweight trainers including:

• Pegasus 39 – Versatile daily trainer
• Pegasus Trail 3 – Rugged cushioned trail shoe
• Pegasus Race – Uptempo trainer/racer
• Air Zoom Pegasus FlyEase – Easy-on accessibility

Their Fresh Foam collections remain smaller than New Balance but provide neutral cushioning options from daily miles to speedwork.

Availability at major retailers

As two of the biggest brands in specialty run shops, both New Balance and Nike Fresh Foam models are widely available at stores nationally. Nike likely edges out in total distribution reach.

Supply chain shortages have impacted stock periodically. But the major shoe models remain accessible both in-store and online.

Direct sales

New Balance and Nike both sell certain models exclusively through their own e-commerce sites. Nike also operates retail flagships for direct buying.

Both brands offer consumers the ability to purchase shoes directly without a middle-man retailer when desired.

Trying before buying

No matter where you shop, having the ability to try on multiple shoe models in person makes finding the best fit easier. That’s a benefit of both brands’ wide retail availability.

Test out the cushioning and fit side by side to decide which Fresh Foam platform feels best for your particular feet and running gait.

Finding the perfect fit can be tricky if you have wide or narrow feet. Let’s examine how the sizing and fit of the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav and Nike Fresh Foam Roav accommodate different foot shapes.

Review sizing and fit options for wide vs narrow feet

While both shoes are available in standard D width for men and B width for women, some key differences exist when it comes to fitting wide or narrow foot proportions.

New Balance’s wide size range

One advantage of New Balance is they offer wide size options beyond just standard. The Fresh Foam Roav comes in 2E wide for men and D wide for women.

Even the standard D width provides a roomier toe box while still securely cradling the midfoot. The engineered mesh upper has some give to accommodate swelling.

For wide or high volume feet, the New Balance is an excellent choice fitting comfortably without tight squeeze.

Nike’s tailored narrow fit

In contrast, the Nike Fresh Foam Roav excels for those with narrow or low volume feet. The slim bootie upper contours without excess room or slipping.

Some wearers do size up in the Nike for extra toe space. But those with truly narrow proportions will appreciate the tailored midfoot wrap.

No excess wiggle room here! The elastic knit upper conforms snugly from heel to toe box.

Forefoot fit comparisons

Up front, the New Balance again provides more wiggle room and Flex for natural toe splay. Runners with wide feet or bunions appreciate the accommodation.

The Nike fits more precisely with no wasted space up front. For narrow or petite feet, the slim profile prevents a sloppy feel.

Midfoot and heel hold

Both models secure the heel effectively thanks to molded collars and internal support. The NB offers a bit more midfoot rigidity from overlays while the Nike relies solely on the knit for a snug hold.

I find either shoe locks my heel in place without lift or rub. The midfoot sensation comes down to preferences on squeezed vs structured.

Ideal usage for each

Due to the accommodating fit and sizing, the New Balance works well for wide-footed runners or for comfort on longer miles. The Nike better suits low volume feet wanting zero slop.

Trying shoes on is always advisable to choose the fit feeling best. Expect a tailored Nike versus roomy New Balance fit.

Finding the right personal fit

Don’t assume all Nikes or New Balances fit your foot shape the same. Be willing to try multiple models and sizes to dial in comfort.

Prioritize a blister-free and pain-free run when assessing fit. With the right pair, you can rack up more happy training miles!

With so many running shoe choices, looking at expert reviews can provide helpful guidance. Let’s compare how the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav and Nike Fresh Foam Roav stack up across leading shoe review sites.

Compare ranking and reviews on expert running shoe sites

When researching shoes, I consult reviews from outlets like RunRepeat, Road Trail Run, and Believe in the Run to see how models rate on factors like cushioning, fit, and performance. How do our two Fresh Foam shoes fare?

RunRepeat rankings and reviews

On RunRepeat’s neutral trainer category rankings, the New Balance Roav earns a score of 8.7/10 while the Nike Roav rates 8.5/10 based on aggregated reviews.

The NB is praised for its luxurious Fresh Foam cushioning and smooth ride. Reviewers describe it as “soft yet lively.” The secure engineered mesh upper also gets positive marks.

The Nike is noted for its incredibly lightweight feel and flexibility. Testers love the barely-there sensation of the minimal upper coupled with springy cushioning.

Road Trail Run’s analysis

This site goes deep on the tech and gives the New Balance Roav an 8.5/10 rating, specifically calling out the plush comfort. They score the Nike an 8/10 for its responsive and flexible ride.

They note both shoes deliver a smooth transition but the NB excels for cushion while the Nike leans towards speedy flexibility.

Believe in the Run verdicts

As a top reviewing outlet, Believe in the Run gives both Roav models 4.5-stars out of 5 in testing. They highlight the quality cushioning and agree the NB prioritizes softness while the Nike focuses on fast transitions.

Their playful videos emphasize how the joyful, smooth ride of Fresh Foam shines in both products.

Synthesizing the data

The consensus from top reviews is both Roav models deliver on lightweight, flexible Fresh Foam cushioning. The New Balance is noted for its plush comfort while the Nike excels at low weight and a barely-there fit.

Both score well as versatile daily trainers. Choosing comes down to your fit and cushion preferences after trying them on.

With so many similarities and differences between the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav and Nike Fresh Foam Roav, it can be tough deciding which is the better running shoe for you. Let’s boil it down to the key factors for making the call.

Provide recommendation for best choice based on key factors

Both New Balance and Nike deliver versatile, well-cushioned trainers with their Fresh Foam models. But there are some considerations that may tip the scales one way or the other based on your individual needs and preferences.

Cushioning needs

The plushier New Balance foam provides all-day comfort for recovery days and long miles while the responsive Nike foam leans towards speed for tempo runs or races. Choose the model matching your primary cushioning priorities.

Foot proportions

Go with the New Balance if you have wider feet needing room up front or utilize wide widths. For narrow or low volume feet, the slim Nike construction fits like a glove.

Intended use

If you mostly stick to roads but occasionally traverse groomed trails, the supportive upper and traction of the NB is an asset. But if you primarily train fast on pavement, the Nike‘s sleek fit suits those needs.

Mileage purposes

For longer training runs and races, the New Balance will likely keep your feet happier for miles 13+ versus the minimalist Nike. But for short and fast 5Ks, the Nike’s barely-there fit prevents distractions.

Aesthetic preferences

Those who love bright colorful looks will be drawn to the New Balance options, while fans of subtle earth tones will appreciate the Nike’s styling.

Brand affiliations

Loyal New Balance runners may favor staying with the familiar fit and feel they’ve come to love. Long-time Nike fans will appreciate continuing with their preferred brand’s innovations.

Personal touch and testing

There are strong cases for both models based on intended use. Try shoes on in-store and run in them outside if you can to determine which feels, fits, and performs best for you.

For me, the New Balance Roav nudges out the win for its supreme balance of responsive cushioning in a foot-friendly package. But I have average width, neutral feet. Make the choice based on your individual needs and preferences!