How can you improve your March Madness bracket predictions. What are the key factors to consider when filling out your NCAA tournament bracket. Which bracketology principles can help you craft a winning strategy.

Understanding the Fundamentals of Bracketology

Bracketology, the art and science of predicting NCAA basketball tournament outcomes, has become an integral part of March Madness excitement. But what exactly is bracketology, and how can it help you create a winning bracket?

Bracketology involves analyzing teams, their performances, and various factors that may influence their success in the tournament. By applying bracketology principles, you can make more informed decisions when filling out your bracket, potentially giving you an edge over casual fans.

The Importance of Bracketology in March Madness

Why is bracketology crucial for March Madness success? Bracketology provides a systematic approach to evaluating teams and predicting outcomes. It helps you move beyond simple win-loss records and delve deeper into factors that truly impact tournament performance.

• Improves decision-making process
• Helps identify potential upsets
• Enhances understanding of team dynamics
• Increases chances of creating a successful bracket

Evaluating Team Strength of Schedule

One of the cornerstones of effective bracketology is assessing a team’s strength of schedule. How does a team’s regular-season competition impact their tournament readiness?

Teams from major conferences often face tougher competition throughout the season, which can better prepare them for the high-pressure environment of March Madness. However, this doesn’t mean you should automatically discount teams from smaller conferences.

Analyzing Schedule Difficulty

How can you effectively evaluate a team’s strength of schedule? Consider the following factors:

1. Conference affiliation
2. Non-conference opponents
3. Road game performance
4. Wins against ranked teams

Is a team’s impressive record the result of facing weak opponents, or have they proven themselves against tough competition? By digging deeper into schedule strength, you can uncover valuable insights that may not be apparent from win-loss records alone.

Comparing Common Opponents for Better Predictions

When faced with a challenging matchup in your bracket, how can you gain an edge in your predictions? One effective strategy is to compare how teams performed against common opponents.

This approach allows you to assess teams on a more level playing field, providing valuable context for their relative strengths and weaknesses. While it requires some research, the insights gained can be crucial in making informed bracket decisions.

Techniques for Effective Common Opponent Analysis

How can you maximize the value of common opponent comparisons? Consider these strategies:

• Look beyond just wins and losses
• Consider the timing of games (early season vs. late season)
• Analyze performance metrics (scoring margin, rebounding, etc.)
• Take note of any significant injuries or lineup changes

By thoroughly examining common opponent performances, you may uncover key differences between teams that could prove decisive in a tournament matchup.

The Role of Geography in Tournament Seeding

Did you know that geography plays a significant role in how the NCAA tournament bracket is constructed? Understanding this aspect of bracketology can provide valuable insights when making your picks.

The selection committee aims to minimize travel for teams, especially in the early rounds. This consideration can sometimes lead to interesting matchups and potential upset opportunities.

Geographical Factors to Consider

How does geography impact tournament dynamics? Keep these factors in mind:

• Teams playing closer to home may have a slight advantage
• Long-distance travel can potentially impact performance
• Regional familiarity may come into play for certain matchups

By considering geographical factors, you might identify situations where a lower-seeded team could have an unexpected edge, leading to a potential bracket-busting upset.

Assessing Team Momentum and Consistency

In the world of March Madness, timing is everything. How a team performs leading up to the tournament can be just as important as their overall season record. But how can you effectively evaluate a team’s momentum?

Look beyond simple win-loss records and examine how teams finished their regular season and conference tournaments. A team that’s hitting its stride at the right time could be poised for a deep tournament run, even if their overall record isn’t as impressive as some other contenders.

Key Indicators of Team Momentum

What should you look for when assessing a team’s momentum? Consider these factors:

1. Performance in the last 10 games of the regular season
2. Conference tournament results
3. Improvements in key statistical categories
4. Health and cohesion of the roster

Teams that demonstrate positive trends in these areas may be well-positioned for tournament success, making them smart picks for your bracket.

The Impact of Coaching Experience in March Madness

When it comes to March Madness, the importance of coaching cannot be overstated. But how exactly does coaching experience influence tournament performance?

Seasoned coaches who have navigated the pressures of March Madness before often have a significant advantage. They understand how to prepare their teams mentally and strategically for the unique challenges of the tournament format.

Evaluating Coaching Pedigree

What factors should you consider when assessing a coach’s potential impact on tournament success?

• Previous NCAA tournament experience
• Record in close games or pressure situations
• Ability to make in-game adjustments
• Success in developing players throughout the season

While a great coach doesn’t guarantee success, teams led by experienced, successful coaches often perform better in the high-pressure environment of March Madness.

Understanding Team Chemistry and Playing Style

Beyond statistics and records, the intangible qualities of a team can play a crucial role in tournament success. How can you assess these less quantifiable factors when filling out your bracket?

Look for teams that demonstrate strong chemistry, resilience, and a playing style that translates well to tournament conditions. Teams that rely heavily on a single star player may be more vulnerable to upset bids than those with a more balanced approach.

Identifying Tournament-Ready Teams

What characteristics often define successful tournament teams?

• Balanced scoring distribution
• Strong defensive fundamentals
• Ability to adapt to different playing styles
• Mental toughness and composure under pressure

Teams exhibiting these qualities may be better equipped to handle the diverse challenges presented by the NCAA tournament format.

Balancing Analysis with Intuition in Bracket Picking

While thorough analysis is crucial in bracketology, there’s also a place for intuition and gut feelings. How can you strike the right balance between data-driven decisions and instinctual picks?

After conducting your research and applying bracketology principles, you may encounter situations where the data doesn’t clearly favor one team over another. In these cases, trusting your instincts can be a valid tiebreaker.

The Role of Intuition in Bracketology

How can you effectively incorporate intuition into your bracket-filling process?

1. Use data and analysis as your foundation
2. Identify situations where teams seem evenly matched
3. Consider any “X-factors” that might not be captured by statistics
4. Trust your basketball knowledge and experience

Remember, even the most sophisticated bracketology approaches can’t account for every variable. Sometimes, a well-informed gut feeling can lead to successful picks that set your bracket apart.

Advanced Statistical Analysis in Bracketology

As bracketology has evolved, advanced statistics have become increasingly important in predicting tournament outcomes. But which statistical measures are most valuable for bracket success?

While traditional stats like points per game and rebounding are still relevant, more sophisticated metrics can provide deeper insights into team strengths and potential tournament performance.

Key Advanced Statistics for March Madness

What advanced statistics should you consider when analyzing teams for your bracket?

• Adjusted Efficiency Margin
• Effective Field Goal Percentage
• Turnover Percentage
• Offensive and Defensive Rebounding Rates
• Strength of Record

These metrics can offer a more nuanced view of team performance, helping you identify potential sleepers and avoid overvaluing teams that may be less equipped for tournament success.

Identifying Potential Cinderella Teams

One of the most exciting aspects of March Madness is the potential for unexpected runs by underdog teams. But how can you spot these Cinderella candidates before they make their mark?

Look for lower-seeded teams that possess qualities often associated with tournament success, such as experienced leadership, strong three-point shooting, and defensive prowess. These teams may be poised to pull off bracket-busting upsets.

Characteristics of Successful Cinderella Teams

What traits often define teams that make surprising tournament runs?

1. Veteran players with tournament experience
2. Efficient offensive systems
3. Strong perimeter defense
4. Ability to control tempo
5. History of success against higher-ranked opponents

By identifying teams with these characteristics, you may be able to predict some of the exciting upsets that make March Madness so thrilling.

The Importance of Conference Tournament Performance

As the NCAA tournament approaches, conference tournaments provide a final opportunity to assess teams’ form and readiness. But how much weight should you give to conference tournament results when filling out your bracket?

While a strong showing in a conference tournament can indicate a team peaking at the right time, it’s important to balance this with their overall body of work. Some teams may prioritize rest and preparation for the NCAA tournament over conference tournament success.

Evaluating Conference Tournament Impact

How can you effectively incorporate conference tournament performance into your bracketology approach?

• Consider the strength of the conference
• Look for signs of improved team chemistry or strategic adjustments
• Assess any impact on team health or fatigue
• Evaluate performance against NCAA tournament-bound opponents

By carefully considering conference tournament results in context, you can gain valuable last-minute insights to refine your bracket picks.

Analyzing Historical Tournament Trends

While each year’s tournament is unique, historical trends can provide valuable context for your bracket decisions. What patterns have emerged from past March Madness tournaments that could inform your picks?

Studying historical data can reveal tendencies in areas such as seed matchups, conference performance, and the frequency of different types of upsets. This information can help you make more informed decisions when faced with challenging bracket choices.

Key Historical Trends to Consider

What historical patterns might be relevant to your 2023 bracket strategy?

1. Frequency of upsets by seed matchup
2. Performance of different conferences in recent tournaments
3. Success rates of different playing styles
4. Impact of tournament experience on team success

While historical trends shouldn’t be the sole basis for your picks, they can provide valuable context and help you avoid common bracket-filling pitfalls.

The Role of Player Matchups in Tournament Success

While team-level analysis is crucial in bracketology, individual player matchups can often be the deciding factor in close games. How can you incorporate player-specific considerations into your bracket strategy?

Look for situations where a team’s star player may face a particularly favorable or challenging matchup. A dominant big man facing a team with weak interior defense, for example, could be poised for a standout performance.

Key Player Matchup Factors

What aspects of player matchups should you consider when analyzing potential tournament games?

• Individual defensive assignments
• Stylistic matchups (e.g., post players vs. perimeter-oriented teams)
• Experience levels in key positions
• Potential for foul trouble in critical matchups

By considering these player-specific factors alongside team-level analysis, you can develop a more nuanced understanding of potential tournament outcomes.

Adapting Your Strategy for Different Bracket Formats

Not all March Madness bracket contests are created equal. How should your approach change based on the specific rules and scoring system of the contest you’re entering?

Different bracket formats may incentivize varying levels of risk-taking or prioritize certain types of predictions. Understanding these nuances can help you tailor your strategy for maximum success in each contest you enter.

Strategies for Common Bracket Formats

How can you optimize your picks for different types of bracket contests?

1. Standard scoring: Balance safe picks with calculated risks
2. Upset bonus formats: Prioritize identifying potential Cinderella teams
3. Seed difference scoring: Focus on predicting accurate advancement, regardless of seed
4. Round-by-round contests: Adapt strategy as the tournament progresses

By adjusting your approach based on the specific rules of each contest, you can maximize your chances of bracket success across various formats.

As you apply these bracketology principles to your 2023 March Madness predictions, remember that the unpredictability of the tournament is part of its enduring appeal. While thorough analysis can certainly improve your odds of success, embracing the excitement of the unexpected is what makes March Madness truly special.

Understand Basic Bracketology Principles

Every March, millions of basketball fans across the United States feverishly fill out brackets in hopes of crafting the perfect March Madness predictions. But casual fans often struggle to make accurate picks, while the bracket pros seem to have an inherent grasp of bracketology – the science behind mapping the path to a winning bracket.

By understanding some key bracketology principles, you can give yourself a major leg up on bracket-picking glory. While there are no foolproof secrets to a perfect bracket, adhering to some basic bracketology guidelines can help you craft intelligent, analytics-based picks.

Consider Strength of Schedule

One of the most important factors savvy bracketologists consider is strength of schedule – how tough was the opposition that each team faced in the regular season? Teams that play in major conferences inevitably face stiffer competition night in and night out compared to mid-major programs.

Come tournament time, battle-tested teams from power conferences tend to be better prepared for the high-stakes win-or-go-home atmosphere. Don’t let a gaudy win-loss record from a small conference team fool you – dig deeper into their schedule to see if they have the seasoning to make a deep tourney run.

Compare Common Opponents

When picking head-to-head matchups in your bracket, compare how potential opponents fared against shared competition. If Team A dominated against a conference foe that narrowly beat Team B, that’s a clue Team A may have the edge if they meet.

Finding common opponents takes research, but it can uncover the difference between two otherwise evenly-matched teams – precisely the margin that makes one team the right bracket upset pick over another.

Understand Bracket Geography

The selection committee tries to keep the geography of teams in mind when putting together bracket matchups. While not a hard rule, they generally attempt to limit travel as much as possible in the early rounds.

Knowing this tendency can provide a good clue as to which upset bids are more viable. If a aptly-named “Cinderella” team from a small conference is pitted against a major program a couple time zones away, geography could work in the underdog’s favor – even if they are seeded much lower.

Consider Momentum and Consistency

March Madness is all about which teams are peaking at the right time with momentum on their side. Be sure to research how potential bracket picks finished their conference season and tournaments. A team that limped to the finish before getting ousted early from their conference tourney may not last long, even with a strong season overall.

Conversely, a team that closed regular season play red-hot before making a surprise conference championship game run could be a smart sleeper bracket pick, despite being less prominent.

Study Coaching Pedigree

The best coaches find ways to squeeze the most magic out of their roster when the spotlight shines brightest in March. Respect the advantage of seasoned coaches from perennial power programs who have been deep into March Madness battles.

Young or inexperienced coaches can get overwhelmed in the high-pressure one-and-done crucible of the big dance. And remember – Cinderella runs are forged by veteran coaches, not fresh faces.

Understand Team Personalities

The NCAA Tournament is always ripe for upsets, in part because some teams simply have the right personality and chemistry to thrive underdogs. Look for unselfish squads that exude toughness, resilience and swagger. Teams with those qualities pull off bracket-shaking March surprises.

Meanwhile, teams that rely heavily on just one or two stars can be more vulnerable to the upset bug if their top players face stiff defensive pressure from a Cinderella club. Well-rounded teams with chemistry tend to survive and advance.

Trust Your Instincts

Even with rigorous bracketology research, there is still an element of “gut feel” in predicting March Madness. When faced with a real coin-flip of a matchup, go with your instincts.

After all, bracketology is meant to be fun! The data and trends will steer you in a wise direction, but never second-guess that gut pickup that feels like a winner.

By embracing these core bracketology principles, you’ll give yourself the best odds at crafting a winning March Madness bracket. Of course, even the sharpest bracketologist can’t foresee every upset or predict every outcome in a 68-team field. The Madness is part of the thrilling fun!

But with smart application of these bracketology basics, you can confidently fill out your 2023 March Madness picks and have a real shot at out-dueling your friends, co-workers and the experts.

Look At Overall Team Strengths and Weaknesses

Filling out a winning March Madness bracket requires looking beyond just a team’s win-loss record. You need to dig deeper into rosters to identify strengths and weaknesses that could foreshadow how teams will fare in the Big Dance.

The most well-rounded squads built to survive and advance in March Madness tend to exhibit these key traits:

Battle-Tested Toughness

Teams forged through the grind of tough conference play and knock-down drag-out rivalry games have the grit and resilience to handle the bright lights and physicality of March Madness. Look for teams with a proven ability to win close, low-scoring slugfests and uptempo shootouts alike.

Multidimensional Scoring

One-dimensional teams that rely heavily on a single star player are ripe for an early upset when that player has an off night. The most dangerous teams have balanced scoring across the roster and multiple playmakers who can create their own shots.

Defensive Disruption

Defense travels in March. The best NCAA Tournament teams typically have an athletic, swarming defense that can rattle opponents and generate transition scoring chances. Pesky defenses that force turnovers can unravel opponents in the high-pressure arena of March Madness.

Rebounding Dominance

Controlling the glass prevents second-chance opportunities for opponents and leads to more putback buckets and transition opportunities. The best March Madness teams impose their will on the boards and win the rebounding margin on a consistent basis.

Deep Bench Contributors

Foul trouble, injuries, and fatigue are inevitabilities in the rapid-fire pace of March Madness play. Teams that can get quality minutes from their bench and role players are built to survive March wear and tear.

On the flip side, be wary of teams that exhibit these weaknesses when evaluating your bracket picks:

Overreliance on Three-Pointers

While the three-ball is a huge part of today’s game, teams that rely too heavily on hot outside shooting can go cold fast. Streaky shooting teams are vulnerable to early upsets.

Undisciplined Play

Teams that average high turnovers or too many fouls are often one-and-done in March. Sloppy, undisciplined play feeds into the underdog’s hands and leads to bracket busters.

Injuries and Absences

Lingering injuries to star players and even academic suspensions can cripple top seeds in March. Make sure your bracket picks aren’t hampered by health issues or unexpected absences.

Inexperience on Big Stage

Teams making their first Big Dance appearance can become overwhelmed by the bright lights and high stakes. Even veteran coaches can struggle if their roster lacks NCAA Tournament experience.

Off-Court Turmoil

Late season suspensions, controversy, or conflict can derail a formerly promising team once March arrives. Factor in any team dysfunctions that could diminish focus and chemistry.

By studying overall team strengths and weaknesses, you’ll be able to better assess which squads are poised for bracket-busting runs. Make sure to evaluate beyond just wins and losses – dig deeper into rosters, statistical trends, and intangible qualities that equip teams for March Madness success.

Keep these key factors in mind when picking your bracket. Teams built with physicality, defensive intensity, depth, experience and discipline have the ingredients for March Madness glory.

Examine How Teams Did Against Quality Opponents

As the madness of March approaches, armchair bracketologists everywhere are sharpening their pencils and putting on their thinking caps. Filling out a bracket is no easy task, with 68 teams vying for the NCAA championship title. One of the keys to a winning bracket is examining how teams performed against quality opponents throughout the season.

When analyzing teams, don’t just look at win-loss records. Dig deeper into strength of schedule and results against ranked opponents. How did a team fare against opponents ranked in the RPI top 25 or 50? Some teams pad their records beating up on weaker competition. You want to look for teams battle-tested against tough adversaries.

For example, let’s say you’re comparing Team A and Team B for one of your bracket slots. Team A is 30-2 but didn’t face a single ranked team all season. Team B is 25-7 but has 5 wins over RPI top 25 teams. In this case, Team B proved itself against quality opponents while Team A is untested. Going with Team B increases your odds of winning that matchup.

In college basketball, the whole is often greater than the sum of its parts. Just because a team is loaded with NBA prospects doesn’t guarantee they will gel together and play as a cohesive unit. Examining performance against quality foes reveals which teams play best as a team.

Look closely at results from in-season tournaments and conference play. The non-conference schedule is littered with buy games that puff up records. But conference play and tournament matchups like the Maui Invitational provide revealing barometers. See which teams rose to the occasion against ranked adversaries or beat expectations.

For example, in the 2022 Maui Invitational, unranked Texas Tech upset #10 Creighton and #9 Kansas to claim the title. This foreshadowed the Red Raiders’ strong season, where they eventually earned a 3-seed in the NCAA tournament. If you’d based your bracket only on preseason rankings, you might have missed this sleeper team.

Digging into a team’s performance against various tiers of opponents – whether top 10, top 25, top 50, or top 100 – provides more meaningful insight than blanket ‘Good Team’ or ‘Bad Team’ labels. Don’t make assumptions based on a team’s brand name or preseason hype. The games aren’t played on paper.

Check for Variances Between Home and Road Performance

An important factor to examine is home versus away record and performance. Some teams thrive at home but can’t win on the road. Others play better with their backs against the wall in a hostile environment.

KenPom and other advanced metrics break down teams’ efficiencies at home versus on the opponent’s home court. Look for large variances. For example, a team that scores 80 points per game at home but only 60 on the road is likely to struggle as a lower seed playing away from home.

In 2021, #1 seed Illinois had a huge split between home and road performance. Nearly all of their quality wins over ranked teams came at home. So when they were upset by #8 seed Loyola Chicago in the Round of 32, it wasn’t shocking based on their road struggles.

The NCAA Tournament is played at neutral sites, which can negate some home court advantages. But it’s still useful to identify teams that thrive on the road or wilt under pressure away from home. This could provide a tiebreaker between two teams in your bracket.

Identify Players With Postseason Pedigrees

One of the biggest factors in March Madness success is experience. Players that have been there before and delivered on the big stage are invaluable assets to championship runs.

When examining teams, look for battle-tested veterans that play key roles. Upperclassmen that played big minutes in previous NCAA Tournaments or even the Final Four. These players won’t get rattled under the bright lights and can provide leadership.

For example, North Carolina’s run to the 2022 championship game was fueled by graduate students Brady Manek and Leaky Black. Having players with 100+ games of experience that also played in the 2021 tournament was a difference-maker.

Not all teams have this playoff seasoning. Relying heavily on freshmen and underclassmen that have never stepped on the March Madness stage is often a recipe for an early exit. Look for teams with key contributors that have proven postseason success.

Identify Momentum and Peaking at the Right Time

The teams that survive and advance in March often enter the NCAA Tournament playing their best basketball. Riding momentum with wins under their belt is a key ingredient.

As you analyze potential bracket busters, pay close attention to how teams finished the season. Who is peaking at just the right time with key wins down the stretch run? Who stumbled into March Madness limping and sputtering?

Often middle-tier teams from smaller conferences gain momentum winning their league tournaments. Riding high after three straight wins, they can be dangerous matchups as underdogs in the Big Dance.

On the flip side, teams like last year’s Kentucky began the tournament on losing streaks. Despite immense talent, they never jelled and got knocked out early after entering on a downward spiral.

Identifying who is hot and who is not before filling out your bracket can help spot prime sleeper picks. Riding the momentum of March could lead a surprising team much deeper than their seed would suggest.

By digging into all of these factors – strength of schedule, quality wins, home/road splits, veteran leadership, and momentum – bracketologists can pinpoint which teams are poised for Deep March runs. Don’t get blinded by rankings and seedings alone. Use these deeper metrics for your bracket sleeper picks.

Research Home vs Away Records And Total Season Performance

One of the key factors in predicting March Madness success is looking at teams’ home and away records. A squad’s performance at home versus on the road provides insight into their NCAA Tournament potential.

When analyzing teams, take a close look at their total home and road records. Some teams thrive playing in front of their home fans but struggle to win games away from home. Other teams actually play better with their backs against the wall in hostile environments.

Advanced metrics like KenPom provide granular breakdowns of teams’ offensive and defensive efficiencies at home versus away games. Look for big splits in the numbers. For example, if a team scores 80 points per game at home but only 60 on the road, that indicates they may falter as a lower seed forced to play away from home.

The 2021 Illinois team provides a good case study. They earned a #1 NCAA Tournament seed after a dominant 24-6 season. However, nearly all their quality wins over ranked teams occurred in the friendly confines of their home arena. On the road against top opponents, Illinois often struggled or lost.

So when they got upset by #8 seed Loyola Chicago in the Round of 32, it wasn’t shocking based on Illinois’ poor track record away from home. Their road woes were a red flag despite overall lofty rankings.

In addition to home/away splits, look at teams’ overall records against different tiers of competition. How did they fare against opponents ranked in the top 10, top 25, top 50, and top 100? Drilling into performance against quality opponents provides better insight than generalizations.

For example, Gonzaga often amasses gaudy win-loss records by beating up on weak West Coast Conference foes. But in 2021, the Zags went 6-2 against top 25 teams in route to a 31-1 season. Their proven ability to step up in big games fueled a Final Four run.

When analyzing teams who overachieved or underachieved versus preseason expectations, their records versus top competition will help explain why. Maybe a supposed National Title contender padded their stats bullying bad teams. Or perhaps a middle-tier squad raised their game repeatedly against ranked adversaries.

In addition to opponent tiers, make sure to examine performance in neutral court games and tournaments. The NCAA Tournament is played at neutral sites, so teams experienced winning away from home against quality foes have an advantage. Track records in tournaments like the Battle 4 Atlantis or Maui Invitational help reveal true March Madness potential.

For example, in the 2022 Maui Invitational, unranked Texas Tech beat two top-10 teams in Creighton and Kansas to claim the coveted title. This neutral court performance foreshadowed the Red Raiders’ strong March Madness run as a 3-seed.

When comparing two teams with similar credentials for your bracket, dig into their neutral court resumes. Which team has more wins away from home against NCAA Tournament caliber squads? This could be a tiebreaker between two otherwise even options.

Finally, make sure to identify hot streaks and downward trajectories. Who enters March Madness playing their best basketball of the season, versus teams limping into the tourney on cold streaks?

Teams like South Carolina in 2022 won their conference tournament and rode that momentum to upset higher seeds in the Big Dance. Meanwhile, other talented teams like Kentucky began NCAA play on 4-5 game losing skids, foreshadowing an early exit.

By combining the data points of home/away records, results against top competition tiers, neutral court performance, and late season momentum or struggles, bracketologists can accurately gauge teams’ potential March Madness success.

Don’t get overly swayed by factors like tradition or preseason hype. The games aren’t played on paper. Crunching the key numbers and records provides clearer insight into which squads are ready to survive and advance when the Madness of March arrives.

Look at Offensive and Defensive Efficiency Trends

In addition to win-loss records, analyzing a team’s offensive and defensive efficiency over the course of the season can reveal useful March Madness trends.

KenPom and other advanced metrics measure a team’s points scored and allowed per 100 possessions. This adjusts for tempo and provides better precision than old-school stats like points per game.

Look for teams that posted improving efficiency trends on one or both ends of the court throughout the season. Teams peaking offensively or defensively in February and March have strong NCAA Tournament potential.

On the flip side, be wary of teams trending downward in efficiency on offense or defense approaching tournament time. Struggling on one or both ends of the floor is an ominous March Madness harbinger.

Analyzing efficiency trends over the last 10-15 games gives a feel for who is surging or sliding at the optimal time. Combine this data with win-loss records down the stretch to identify teams poised for Deep March runs.

By digging into home/away records, results against quality opponents, late-season performance, and efficiency trends, bracketologists can pinpoint the teams ready to wreak havoc on their March Madness predictions.

Is Bracketology The Key To March Madness Glory?: The 15 Secrets To Filling Out A Winning NCAA Bracket in 2023

Study Conference Tournament Results And Late Season Momentum

As the Madness of March approaches, armchair prognosticators everywhere are sharpening their pencils and honing their bracketology skills. But what are the keys to accurately predicting those tantalizing early round upsets and that seemingly unstoppable #1 seed? While luck certainly plays a role, there are research-backed strategies that can tip the odds in your favor. Here are 15 secrets to help you gain the winning edge in your office pool:

Momentum Matters

How a team finishes the regular season offers insight into how they’ll perform in the tournament. Analyze results from the last 10 games – teams trending upward with quality wins tend to outperform seeded expectations. Watch for conference champs that got hot late after a middling regular season. Conversely, high seeds that sputtered down the stretch make unlikely Final Four candidates.

Follow the Freshmen

First year phenoms can provide that instant March injection to carry a team. Study the impact of freshmen starters and high scorers – their ability to immediately contribute primes them for primetime. Remember that tourney pressure can overwhelm, so temper freshman expectations against quality opponents.

Conference Tournaments Tell All

Conference tourney results provide a real-time assessment of team health. Champion squads demonstrate peaking performance and confirm regular season success. Early flameouts signal dysfunction and overrated seeds. Note which teams gained experience in hard-fought finals to prep for the Big Dance stage.

Defense travels

Stingy defenses thrive in the more deliberate tourney format. Examine teams that limit opponents under 40% shooting and 60 points per game – they’ll muck up games and pull off upsets. Be wary of squads that rely on offense over defense regardless of gaudy scoring averages.

Margin matters more than record

Win-loss records can disguise vulnerabilities that surface in March. Instead scrutinize average margin of victory and performance in close contests. Teams winning nail biters may lack Put away power, while dominant squads demonstrate an ability to finish. Beware of schools feasting on weak opponents.

Experience breeds brackets

There’s no substitute for senior savvy in crunch time tournament battles. Teams led by upperclassmen play with poise under pressure. Multi-year star power provides leadership and continuity for deep runs. Just one or two key veterans can anchor otherwise youthful rosters.

Offensive balance breaks brackets

Diverse scoring portfolio hedge against cold shooting nights. Multi-dimensional offenses with interior and perimeter threats are tougher to scheme against. Compare FG percentages – teams shooting 45%+ demonstrate versatility to adapt if shots aren’t falling.

Guard play guides the way

Backcourt maestros dictate flow and facilitate scoring opportunities. Look for seasoned ball-handling guards healthy and playing major minutes into March. Left-handed point guards also gain an incremental advantage with unorthodox moves.

Watch the glass

Rebounding rate differentiates contenders from early exits. Dominant teams control the boards, especially offensively for 2nd chance buckets. Examine rebound margin and individual totals – the glass is an essential barometer of physicality.

Free throws foretell fate

Adept free throw shooting prevents tournament foibles. Accurate teams maintain margins and close out tight contests. FT percentages indicate depth and discipline. Suspect foul shooters make unlikely heroes when games go down to the wire.

3-point prowess provides potency

Long distance proficiency is a key bracket booster in March. Compare percentage of points from 3’s and arc accuracy – squads generating high proportions of offense behind the arc space the floor. But beware living and dying by the trey against zone defenses.

Road warriors welcome wins

True title contenders demonstrate winning ways away from home. Use regular season road and neutral court performance to gauge tourney success. For lower seeds, even a few quality road/neutral victories indicate giant killing capacity.

Coaching credentials count

The best leaders thrive with micro-adjustments under tourney spotlight. Give a boost to teams with coaches holding winning March résumés. Underrated strategists guide underdogs on surprise journeys.

Numbers never lie

Statistical models can unearth overlooked angles and increase objectivity. Consider respected bracketology formula factors like strength of schedule, rating systems (RPI, Sagarin), and key metrics (- rebounding, scoring defense, turnover margin). Let data guide your gut.

While bracketology isn’t an exact science, applying these analytic principles can help you gain a winning edge. Remember every point counts in that office pool, so use these secrets to get a leg up on your coworkers. With smart strategy and a little luck come tournament time, you may just find bracket bliss and March Madness glory!

Is Bracketology The Key To March Madness Glory?: The 15 Secrets To Filling Out A Winning NCAA Bracket in 2023

Identify First Round Upset Possibilities

It’s almost time for March Madness, which means brackets, buzzer-beaters, and bewilderment. As you prepare your bracket, you know the key is finding those pivotal first round upsets. While favorites tend to advance, every year multiple lower seeds topple giants and bust brackets nationwide. How can you spot the clashes primed for an opening stunner? Here are tips for pinpointing first round upset specials:

Scan for Shaky High Seeds

Not all #1-4 seeds are created equal. Scrutinize their performance down the regular season stretch – limping finishes signal vulnerability. Check for inflated seeds propped up by a strong conference. And beware teams that relied on a lone superstar – they can be neutralized. Spot the jittery high seed and brace for a fall.

Matchup Misfits

Stylistic mismatches give underdogs hope. Identify where a favored team’s strengths align poorly against their opponent. For example, three point reliant squads can be smothered by smothering perimeter defenses. Or low post bruisers could demolish finesse shot blockers on the boards. Bad matchups lead to first round frights.

Geography Matters

Travel and location affects underdog odds. Lower seeds playing closer to home gain a boost versus cross-country journeys. Watch for smaller conference champs landing a fortuitous venue matchup. And don’t underestimate the power of a hostile crowd rallying Cinderella.

Experience the Difference

Seasoned teams exhibit poise under fire compared to wide-eyed newbies. Check for First Four debutantes and dance first-timers facing off versus tourney tested teams. That gap in experience can be just enough to spur the upset.

Numbers Add Up

Statistical analysis reveals openings the seeding misses. Use advanced metrics like offensive and defensive efficiency ratings to find defensive stalwarts underseeded. Watch efficiency margins between opponents for red flags on higher seeds. Let the analytics guide your upsets.

Coaching Competency

A strategic mastermind on the sidelines evens odds for their lower seeded squad. Identify respected coaches at perceived underdogs with track records of overachievement. Their game plans and adjustments could topple more talented yet predictable favored foes.

Momentum Over Ranking

Who’s hotter entering March matters more than season-long resumes. Find those dangerous floaters surging late but stuck with mediocre seeds. Conversely, beware higher seeds limping into tournament after starting hot. Ride positive momentum.

Bet on the Big Dog

Star power provides an equalizer, even for underdogs. Scan for rosters with a transcendent player capable of putting the team on their back. Dominant scorers, rim protectors, and facilitators can single-handedly wreck brackets.

Hungry for More

Overlooked teams sporting a chip on their shoulder are dangerous. Check for consistently underrated mid-majors and bitter bubble teams barely squeaking in. The dismissive seed can become bulletin board material.

Follow Your Gut

Analytics aren’t everything – sometimes you just have to trust your instincts. If a lower seed just feels frisky or you sense danger for the favorite, trust your bracketology Spidey sense. Your intuition might be hinting at the upset.

Finding those tempting first round bracket busters takes research and a dash of feel. Trust the matchups, momentum, and metrics to single out the giant ripe for slaying. Remember – part of the March Madness fun is throwing some caution to the wind on a gutsy upset pick. So embrace your inner Cinderella and go dance with an early round stunner!

Is Bracketology The Key To March Madness Glory?: The 15 Secrets To Filling Out A Winning NCAA Bracket in 2023

Locate #1 Seeds Most Likely To Stumble Early

The search for bracket-busting first round upsets starts with the seemingly unstoppable #1 seeds. While they advance most years, every tournament has that shocking top seed meltdown. So which probable #1 has the ingredients for a round one disaster? Here are the clues to locate the next bracket-shattering collapse:

Scour Strength of Schedule

First check those non-conference schedules. Cream puff opponents all season long points to #1 seed inflated by feasting on cupcakes. Stepping up in competition stymies these frauds.

Scan for Signs of Slowing

No team sprints for an entire season. Analyze performance over their last 10-15 games. Evidence of limping to the finish, such as recurring blowout losses or unimpressive victories, spell trouble.

Beware the Unbalanced

Well-rounded teams better withstand the slings and arrows of March. Examine if a #1 seed leans too heavily on one dimension, like relying on a single star player or three point shooting. Stop their strength and they crumble.

Check Road and Neutral Struggles

True contenders thrive on hostile ground. Review road and neutral court records for red flags like middling performance and bad losses. Home-heavy heroes frequently fail under tourney spotlight.

Identify Postseason Neophytes

Success under the win-or-go-home pressure is a learned skill. Spot #1 seeds whose core hasn’t faced that fire beyond maybe a conference tourney. Their inexperience surfaces early.

Probe for Poor Coaching

An in-over-their-head coach finally gets exposed on the big stage, dragging down their otherwise talented roster. Look for unimpressive tourney records and inability to make in-game adjustments.

Matchup Mismatches

Sometimes it’s simply the luck of the draw. Certain lower seeded early opponents present problematic styles. Like swarming guards dismantling plodding big men or zone pressuring three happy shooting squads.

Underrated Opponents

Don’t judge a 14-16 seed solely on their profile. Search for quality mid-major squads underseeded due to a weak conference or injury issues now resolved. Their best reveals the #1’s flaws.

Off-Court Turmoil

Team chemistry collapsing at the wrong time spells March sadness. Uncover locker room rifts, disciplinary issues, or academic scandals that distracted during crunch time. Inner turmoil topples titans.

Heed Signs of Fatigue

A punishing regular season drains even #1 seeds entering the daunting tourney road. Telltale indicators include key player injuries, reduced minutes from stars, and heavy reliance on bench depth late season.

Look for Peaking Pressure

The burden of three straight weeks of must-win games wears on top teams. Analyze body language and late game execution for tightness or tentative play. Spot cracks in confident armor.

Digging deeper reveals #1 seeds primed for unprecedented platoon upset despite gaudy rankings. Trust your bracketology research to pinpoint the seemingly invincible favorite with key vulnerabilities ready to be exposed in round one. Then brace for shocking day one tourney turmoil!

Is Bracketology The Key To March Madness Glory?: The 15 Secrets To Filling Out A Winning NCAA Bracket in 2023

Find Sleepers Primed For Cinderella Runs

The thrilling Cinderella stories breathe life into March Madness. Who will be this year’s darling underdogs rising from obscurity to dance into bracket lore? Uncovering the overlooked gems requires digging beyond seeding. Here are clues to uncover the prime sleepers ready for a shockingly deep run:

Mine the Metrics

Advanced analytics expose undervalued squads. Unearth mid-majors ranked highly in predictive measures like KenPom and Sagarin that outplay their pedestrian profile. The numbers signal a coming out party.

Ride Momentum Upward

Monitor teams trending up late in the season for dangerous floaters, catching fire at the perfect time. Strong finishes and conference tournament runs point to a peaking Cinderella slipper fit.

Experience Over Youth

Seasoned squads boast the poise to thrive under bright lights. Look for senior-laden rosters and impact veterans used to tight tournament conditions to guide upstarts.

Coaching Edge

A mastermind coach elevates seemingly overmatched underdogs. Spot respected game-changers exceeding expectations and motivated to shine finally on big stage.

Offensive Creativity

Unique and versatile scoring systems can upend unsuspecting favorites. Identify multi-dimensional offenses not reliant on one-dimensional stars to flummox foes.

Defensive Disruption

Elite defense travels against unfamiliar opponents. Pinpoint those turnover-forcing, glass-crashing units that can suffocate flashy offenses out of rhythm.

Giant Killer Resume

Proven ability to compete against top competition suggests an ability to pull more upsets. Search for teams with quality wins over pedigreed programs in past years despite lower seeding.

Geographic Advantages

Proximity breeds comfort. Zero in on smaller conference darlings playing close to their campus with a hometown crowd edge.

Star Power

A singular stud can put a team on their back. Scan rosters for that transcendent, under-the-radar talent capable of superstar breakout on big stage.

Follow Your Gut

Sometimes you just have to trust your instincts and take a flier. If a team passes the eye test or you buy the romantic underdog narrative, go with it.

Blending analytics and intangibles unmasks the next Cinderella. Trust the data and your gut feelings to spotlight those off-the-radar troublemakers. Then watch them shock the world and create March magic!

Is Bracketology The Key To March Madness Glory?: The 15 Secrets To Filling Out A Winning NCAA Bracket in 2023

Locate Potential Bracket Busters From Mid-Major Conferences

The slipper fitting Cinderellas often hail from overlooked mid-major conferences. But not every champion from the WCC or Atlantic Sun can topple titans. How to identify this year’s dangerous disruptors? Here are tips for locating prime upset-minded teams from the middle of the pack leagues:

Scan Advanced Metrics

Surface-level records conceal potential in weaker conferences. Consult predictive measures like KenPom and BPI that highlight undervalued mid-major standouts based on pace-adjusted efficiencies.

Study Non-Conference Performance

Review early season games against elite power conference foes. Even close losses signal the ability to trade blows outside their league. Monster upsets confirm legit upset scaries.

Road Warriors Welcome

True bracket busters win away from home. Look for strong road and neutral court play for proof they won’t wilt in an unfamiliar arena.

Tournament Tested

Multi-year stars accustomed to conference championship stages adapt better under bright lights. Seek veteran teams frequently qualifying.

Coaching Edge

Savvy strategists elevate seeming underdogs. Respectable records guiding multiple programs indicates stylistic flexibility to gameplan against new challenges.

Guard Play Rules

Backcourt dominance drives mid-major madness. Scan for senior playmaking guards adept at controlling tempo and creating offense.

Pace Pushers

Uptempo, high-possession systems can dizzy plodding power conference teams. Identify speed demons averaging 70+ possessions per game.

Unique Attacking Styles

Unconventional offensive systems befuddle traditional defenses. Find teams employing speciality systems like Princeton sets, Grinnell’s run-and-gun, or organized chaos pressure.

Undersized Shot Blockers

Minus pure size, aggressive weakside shot blockers spark upsets. Pinpoint deft defenders averaging 2+ swats despite modest height.

Follow Your Gut

Sometimes the stats don’t tell the whole story. If a team passes the eye test and you feel potential, buy in on those good vibes.

Blending analytics with intangibles can uncover the mid-major Cinderella in waiting. Trust the data and your instincts to spotlight the bracket buster capable of fairy tale March magic!

Is Bracketology The Key To March Madness Glory?: The 15 Secrets To Filling Out A Winning NCAA Bracket in 2023

Uncover Double Digit Seeds With Giant Killer Potential

Mining for diamond-in-the-rough double digit seeds capable of shockwaves requires peering behind the rankings. While rare, each tournament produces a few out-of-nowhere giant killers emerging from the 10-16 seeds. How can you identify the overlooked also-rans primed to play historic spoiler? Here are hints to uncover the stealth sleeper Cinderellas:

Look Behind Deceiving Records

Mediocre win-loss marks can mask threat level. Scan schedule for competitiveness in losses to quality opponents. Evidence of playing elite teams tight indicates upset upside.

Research Recruiting Rankings

Raw talent sometimes trumps seeding. Note doubles with heralded prospects punching below their weight. Postseason provides a proving ground for former blue chips.

Gauge Momentum

Who enters March hot? Pinpoint double digit seeds winning 6+ of their last 10 games or energized by a conference championship. Positive late vibes foreshadow bracket havoc.

Established Experience

Veteran teams exhibit less tourney jitters. Search for double digit core groups of upperclassmen accustomed to tight contests and postseason.

Strength of Schedule Signals

Don’t penalize teams from weak conferences, but give credit for battles against elite. Even close losses to pedigreed programs prove preparedness.

Coaching Upsets

Brilliant coaching shrinks talent gaps. Respected career overachievers deserving of a showcase generate gameplans to stymie favorites.

Statistical Standouts

Re-rank teams using predictive advanced metrics for hidden gems. KenPom, BPI and Sagarin evaluate performance context-free.

Defensive Disruption

Swarming defenses travel against unfamiliar opposition. Identify turnover-forcing, glass-crashing units to short circuit powerhouses.

Offensive X-Factors

Single offensive exploiters create mismatch dilemmas that amplify upset odds – like dynamic guards, unstoppable slashers or sharpshooting specialists.

Blending analytics, intangibles and context reveals those buried bracket Cinderellas waiting for their moment to pull off the unthinkable. Dig behind the rankings to spotlight the giant killer in waiting!

Is Bracketology The Key To March Madness Glory?: The 15 Secrets To Filling Out A Winning NCAA Bracket in 2023

Consider Coaching Pedigree And Experience

In the high-stakes win-or-go-home crucible of March, sideline leadership makes or breaks a team’s title hopes. As you evaluate contenders, be sure to factor in coaching pedigree and experience. The best strategists thrive under the tournament spotlight. Here are coaching clues to guide your bracket:

Proven Postseason Pedigree

Give premium consideration to teams led by coaches with March success on their resume. Track records of deep tourney runs point to psychological readiness.

Adaptability Acumen

Crafty coaches tailor game plans and on-the-fly adjustments to personnel. Look for demonstrated flexibility thriving with varying rosters.

Player Development Track Record

The best leaders improve players year to year. Reputation for cultivating draft picks proves an ability to maximize talent.

System Success Across Programs

Migratory sideline legends thrive implanting their systems into new teams. Sustained excellence at multiple schools confirms versatile coaching skills.

Personnel Pedagogy Fit

Analyze if coach strategy draws ideal strengths from the roster. For example, half court teachers uplifting methodical offenses or defensive drill sergeants fueling shutdown units.

Tournament Tested

Sustained years qualifying teams battle-hardens both coach and core players. Multi-tourney experience breeds familiarity with March stages.

Elite Game Management

Master adjuster coaches dictate tempo and create advantages with substitutions, timeouts and end game situations. They influence outcomes.

Respected Peer Reputation

Don’t ignore the praise of coaching peers. If their knowledge evaluators laud a coach’s postseason acumen, buy in.

Stellar ATS Records

Coaches who consistently cover Vegas point spreads outcoach expectations. Success versus the betting line confirms exceeding projected performance.

Follow Late Game Trends

Study end game execution over the last 10 contests. Do they thrive or struggle when pace and pressure escalates down the stretch?

Incorporating coaching know-how into your bracketology analysis provides tiebreaking clarity in close cases. Let time-tested teachers tip the scales when torn between tantalizing teams.

Is Bracketology The Key To March Madness Glory?: The 15 Secrets To Filling Out A Winning NCAA Bracket in 2023

Analyze Offensive And Defensive Efficiency Rankings

When filling out your bracket, move beyond basic stats and examine a team’s fundamental efficiencies. Advanced analytics like KenPom adjust for pace and competition, revealing true offensive and defensive prowess hidden beneath conventional numbers. Incorporating efficiency rankings in your bracketology unmasks contenders and pretenders. Here’s how to harness the analytics:

Prioritize Efficiency Over Scoring Margins

Raw point totals disguise flaws. Teams can rack up numbers against weak competition. Instead favor those more efficient on a per possession basis.

Examine Consistency Across Metrics

Look for teams ranking high in both offensive and defensive efficiency. Balanced efficiencies indicate reliable performance when stakes are highest.

Compare Efficiency Versus Scoring Defense

If a team ranks significantly higher in defensive efficiency than points allowed, it signals upside. The inverse indicates they benefited from weak offenses.

Spot Dropoffs Versus Previous Seasons

Regression in key efficiency metrics from past seasons raises red flags about teams overachieving inflated seeds.

Note Efficiency Changes Late Season

Finish hot or limping? Monitor efficiency trends the last 10 games for surging and plunging units entering tournament play.

Factor in Strength of Schedule

Efficiency ratings must be viewed against level of competition. High marks against fierce opponents confirm legitimacy.

Trust Efficiencies Over Record

Teams can accrue gaudy wins against cupcakes. Let efficiency ratings guide you on teams punching above or below their win-loss mark.

Identify Imbalances

One extreme efficiency can mask another – like stellar offenses covering for porous defenses. Seek well-rounded balance.

Watch Outliers Regress

Extreme top 10 offensive or defensive units rarely sustain dominance through an entire tournament run. Expect some Statistical correction.

Incorporating pace-adjusted efficiency metrics into your bracketology analysis strips away schedule noise and reveals reliable contenders. Let the advanced analytics guide you to efficient teams built for March success.

Is Bracketology The Key To March Madness Glory?: The 15 Secrets To Filling Out A Winning NCAA Bracket in 2023

Research Teams With Upperclassman Leadership

One key ingredient for March success is seasoned leadership. As you scan potential bracket winners and busting underdogs, be sure to research a team’s upperclassmen presence. Veterans who’ve been through high-pressure tournament battles provide invaluable direction amidst madness. Here are clues veteran savvy offers contenders:

Battle-Tested Poise

Multi-year players demonstrate composure handling hostile environments and tight game situations having already experienced them.

Continuity and Chemistry

Upperclassmen cores who’ve played together for multiple seasons move in sync and understand team roles. Continuity executes in clutch moments.

Succession Planning

Effective teams gradually pass leadership torches to rising veterans, ensuring stability after star departures. Look for next men up.

Commitment to Details

Vets emphasize scouting reports, video review and tendency nuances gleaned from previous matchups with opponents.

Poised Decision-Making

Clutch possessions require calm and confidence. Expect steady upperclassman hands to guide offenses and defensive stops at consequential times.

Stabilizing Presence

Seasoned vets keep emotions even-keeled through hostile runs and highs. Their steadiness rubs off on underclassmen.

Psychology of Experience

Multi-tourney tested teams understand mental focus and intensity required, avoiding first time jitters.

Been There, Done That

Comebacks, blowouts, hostile arenas – veterans have perspective and recollection to draw from having navigated myriad March scenarios.

Let a wealth of upperclassman leadership guide your bracket picks and upend your upsets. Their savvy and composure provides an impactful edge amidst the Madness.

Is Bracketology The Key To March Madness Glory?: The 15 Secrets To Filling Out A Winning NCAA Bracket in 2023

Identify Squads Peaking At The Right Time

Momentum matters when filling out brackets. Analyzing late season performance provides clues on squads hitting their stride or limping as the Madness arrives. Teams want to be playing their best basketball in March, not November. Here are signs a team is peaking perfectly for tournament success:

Closing Kick

Examine regular season-ending performance over the last 10+ games. Stringing together consecutive quality wins confirms positive trajectory.

Dominant Ladders

Monitor margin of victory down the stretch, not just wins. Regular season-ending blowouts demonstrate dominance entering postseason.

Conference Championship Boost

Winning the league tourney proves ability to prevail in single-elimination format under pressure.

Defensive Intensity

Look for stingy defenses allowing under 60 points a game in closing weeks. Clamping down propels deep runs.

Balanced Efficiency

Teams peaking show top 40 efficiency ratings on both offense and defense entering tourney. Balance travels.

Healthy Rosters

Injury-free squads firing on all cylinders have an edge. Check that key contributors will play.

New Wave Emergence

Late surges from young players and transfer adds provide sparks. Their emergence widens options.

Energy and Enthusiasm

Intangibles like effort, body language and hustle fuel momentum. Peaking teams play inspired down the stretch.

Pinpointing March’s hottest hands as the madness arrives provides bracketology clarity. Trust peak performance in final weeks as harbinger of more March success.

Is Bracketology The Key To March Madness Glory?: The 15 Secrets To Filling Out A Winning NCAA Bracket in 2023

Trust Your Instincts And Enjoy The Madness

Bracketology may aim to bring order to March Madness, but imperfection and upsets are part of the fun. After weighing all the analytics, trends and research, don’t forget to listen to your gut when filling out your picks. Sometimes your instincts just feel a team’s magic. Here are ways to balance data and hunches for optimal bracket success:

Lean Into Likeable Underdogs

The tournament favors plucky overachievers with a compelling narrative. Let your heart pick a few irresistible Cinderella stories.

Follow Your Bracketology Spidey Sense

If your gut says a lower seed will rise up or favorite falls, trust your instincts. Your subconscious synthesized intel your conscious mind missed.

Pick a Pet Team

Sentimental favorites you cheer for all season long often win you over by tournament time. Ride their momentum deeper than logic may advise.

Bet on Backstories

Teams rallying around a cause or uplifting community inject intangibles that numbers fail to capture. Let narrative be your tiebreaker.

Lean Into Past Success

Previous memorable March runs can inspire encores, even after personnel changes. Consider pedigree beyond just this season.

Have Fun With Homer Picks

Throw your hometown or alma mater a high seed just for kicks. One fluke win and you’ll look like a genius.

Take Some Crazy Chances

No harm in a few reckless longshot picks. Mass chaos makes March special so embrace some Madness.

Go Against The Grain

When in doubt between two popular options, take the road less traveled. Fade the public to find value.

The beauty of March Madness lies in its unpredictability. So make some picks with your heart, have fun with hunches, and enjoy the sonic chaos of busted brackets nationwide!