Which Contend 8 shoe offers better cushioning. How does Gel technology affect performance. What are the key differences between Gel and non-Gel Contend 8 models. Which shoe provides more stability for runners. How do the two models compare in terms of durability and lifespan.

Understanding the ASICS Contend 8 Lineup: Gel vs Non-Gel Models

The ASICS Contend 8 series offers runners two distinct options: the Gel Contend 8 and the standard Contend 8. Both shoes are designed to provide stability, cushioning, and durability at an affordable price point, but they cater to different runner preferences and needs.

Key Features of the Gel Contend 8

• Responsive Gel cushioning system in the rearfoot
• Guidance Line technology for smooth gait transitions
• Softer, bouncier feel underfoot
• Breathable mesh upper with reflective details
• Weight: 9.1 oz
• Drop: 10mm

Key Features of the Standard Contend 8

• Structured design for medium to high arched runners
• Vertical flex groove along the midsole
• ASICS High Abrasion Rubber (AHAR) outsole
• Firmer, more responsive ride
• Weight: 9.7 oz
• Drop: 8mm

The Impact of Gel Technology on Running Performance

Gel technology is a hallmark feature of many ASICS running shoes, including the Gel Contend 8. But how does it affect running performance?

Gel cushioning provides enhanced shock absorption, particularly in the rearfoot area where initial impact occurs during heel strikes. This can lead to a softer, more comfortable ride, especially for runners who are prone to heel striking or those who prioritize impact protection.

The Gel Contend 8’s responsive cushioning system adapts to the runner’s foot strike, providing a bouncy feel that can help maintain energy return throughout the run. This can be particularly beneficial for longer distances or recovery runs where comfort is a priority.

However, it’s important to note that while Gel technology excels in comfort and shock absorption, it may not provide as much stability as the firmer midsole of the standard Contend 8. Runners who require more structural support might find the non-Gel version more suitable for their needs.

Stability and Support: Comparing the Two Contend 8 Models

When it comes to stability and support, the standard Contend 8 takes the lead. Its structured design caters specifically to runners with medium to high arches, providing a stable platform that can help prevent overpronation and maintain proper alignment throughout the gait cycle.

The vertical flex groove along the midsole of the standard Contend 8 enhances the shoe’s stability by allowing for natural foot movement while still providing a firm, supportive base. This feature, combined with the snugger midfoot fit, creates a more controlled and responsive ride.

In contrast, the Gel Contend 8 offers a different kind of support. While it may not provide the same level of structural stability as its counterpart, the Gel cushioning system helps absorb shock and reduce the overall stress on the feet and legs. This can be particularly beneficial for runners with joint issues or those who prioritize impact protection over rigid support.

Durability and Lifespan: Which Contend 8 Model Lasts Longer?

When investing in running shoes, durability is a crucial factor to consider. How do the Gel Contend 8 and standard Contend 8 compare in terms of longevity?

Based on user reviews and experiences, the standard Contend 8 appears to have a slight edge in durability. The ASICS High Abrasion Rubber (AHAR) outsole is designed to withstand high-mileage training, showing minimal wear even after hundreds of miles.

On average, runners report that the standard Contend 8 lasts between 30-60 miles before requiring replacement, while the Gel Contend 8 typically needs to be replaced after 20-45 miles. This difference in lifespan could be attributed to the firmer, more structured design of the standard model, which may hold up better to repeated impact and wear.

However, it’s important to note that shoe lifespan can vary greatly depending on individual running style, body weight, and the surfaces on which you primarily run. Regular rotation between multiple pairs of shoes can also help extend their overall lifespan.

Comfort vs. Performance: Finding the Right Balance

Choosing between comfort and performance is often a balancing act for runners. The Gel Contend 8 and standard Contend 8 each offer unique benefits in this regard.

The Gel Contend 8 excels in providing a plush, comfortable ride. Its responsive Gel cushioning system offers excellent shock absorption, making it an attractive option for runners who prioritize comfort or those recovering from injuries. The softer feel underfoot can be particularly appealing for longer runs or recovery days when your legs need extra pampering.

On the other hand, the standard Contend 8 focuses more on performance and stability. Its firmer midsole and structured design provide a responsive ride that can help improve running efficiency and form. This can be especially beneficial for runners looking to increase their speed or tackle more challenging terrains.

Ultimately, the choice between comfort and performance depends on your individual running goals, preferences, and physical needs. Some runners may find that the extra cushioning of the Gel model allows them to run longer distances with less fatigue, while others may prefer the firmer feel of the standard model for its ability to provide more feedback and promote proper form.

Considering Your Running Style and Needs

When deciding between the Gel Contend 8 and the standard Contend 8, it’s crucial to consider your individual running style and needs. Several factors come into play:

Gait and Pronation

Do you have a neutral gait or do you tend to overpronate? The Gel Contend 8 is generally better suited for neutral runners, while the standard Contend 8’s structured design can provide more support for those who overpronate.

Arch Type

If you have medium to high arches, the standard Contend 8 might provide better support. Those with lower arches might find the Gel Contend 8 more comfortable.

Running Surface

Where do you primarily run? The standard Contend 8’s durable outsole and firmer ride might be better for trail running or uneven surfaces, while the Gel Contend 8 could be preferable for road running.

Training Goals

Are you training for speed or endurance? The responsive ride of the standard Contend 8 might be better for speed work, while the cushioning of the Gel model could be beneficial for long-distance training.

Making the Final Decision: Tips for Choosing Your Contend 8

With all the information about the Gel Contend 8 and standard Contend 8, how can you make the best decision for your running needs? Here are some practical tips:

1. Try both models: If possible, test both shoes on short runs. This will give you a real feel for the differences in cushioning, stability, and overall fit.
2. Consider your running history: If you’ve had success with firmer, more structured shoes in the past, the standard Contend 8 might be a good fit. If you prefer softer cushioning, lean towards the Gel model.
3. Think about your injury history: If you’re prone to joint pain or recovering from an injury, the extra cushioning of the Gel Contend 8 could be beneficial. For those needing more stability to prevent injuries, the standard model might be a better choice.
4. Factor in your budget: While both models are affordable, consider the potential difference in lifespan. The standard Contend 8 might offer better value in the long run due to its higher durability.
5. Consult with experts: Don’t hesitate to seek advice from running store staff or a podiatrist. They can provide personalized recommendations based on your foot shape and running style.

Remember, the “best” shoe is highly individual. What works perfectly for one runner might not be ideal for another. By carefully considering your needs, trying out both options, and listening to your body, you’ll be well-equipped to choose the Contend 8 model that will best support your running journey.

Introduction to Gel and ASIC Contend 8 Running Shoes

As an avid runner gearing up for marathon training, I faced a dilemma when it came time to buy new shoes – which Contend 8 model would best suit my needs? I had narrowed it down between the Asics Gel Contend 8 and the Asics Contend 8. Both offered stability, cushioning and durability at an affordable price point, but which was the better choice?

On one hand, the Gel Contend 8 came well recommended by my running buddies for its responsive Gel cushioning system. They said the rearfoot gel provided shock absorption mile after mile. The special Guidance Line technology also helped them achieve a smooth transition through each gait cycle. However, some warned the Gel models didn’t offer as much stability as the regular Contend 8.

The Contend 8 without the Gel technology appealed to me for its structured design to support medium to high arched runners. The vertical flex groove along the midsole paired with Asics High Abrasion Rubber (AHAR) outsole seemed ideal for tackling long distances. Though some mentioned the firmer feel of these shoes could become tiring over time compared to the well-cushioned Gel.

I tried both models on back-to-back runs at my local running specialty shop. Right away I noticed the Gel Contend 8 felt soft and bouncy but flexible underfoot. The upper mesh wrapped my foot in breathable comfort. In contrast, the Contend 8 had a snugger fit through the midfoot with a stiffer ride. Yet it provided a stable platform for a powerful toe-off. I appreciated the traction of the rugged outsole on twists and turns.

Still unsure which to choose, I turned to other runners’ experiences for insight. My training buddy Sue who was recovering from knee issues loved her Gel Contend 8. She said the plush cushioning softened impact without sacrificing responsiveness. An avid trail runner in my club preferred the stability and grip of the regular Contend 8 on uneven terrain. A new runner also shared how the structured Contend 8 helped him develop better form as he got into the sport.

After more investigating, I compared specs between the two models. The Gel Contend 8 weighed 9.1 oz with a 10mm drop, while the Contend 8 came in slightly heavier at 9.7 oz with an 8mm drop. Both had seamless anti-microbial uppers, though the Gel had reflective details for low light visibility. Reviews showed the Gel averaged 20-45 miles lifespan before replacement, while the Contend 8 averaged 30-60.

Taking all factors into account, I decided the extra stability and durability of the Contend 8 made it a smarter investment for my training needs. Though the Gel model offered plush cushioning for comfort, I didn’t want to risk injury with inadequate support for my neutral gait. I also appreciated the firmer ride of the Contend 8 would provide feedback to improve my form.

My Experience with the ASICS Contend 8

Now several months and over 200 miles into training with the Contend 8, I’m confident I made the right choice. The snugger fit through the midfoot keeps me aligned on long runs when fatigue sets in. The structured sole also keeps me balanced on uneven trails near my house. Despite the firmness, the shoe still retains enough cushioning for recovery days when my legs feel more taxed.

The outsole also gets high marks for durability, showing minimal wear so far. I’ve begun to notice the midsole feeling slightly compressed with mileage, but not enough to affect performance or comfort yet. For the affordable price, I’m very happy with how long these shoes are lasting.

Though I sometimes wonder if the Gel Contend 8 may have been a tad softer, I know the structure of the Contend 8 is better preventing injury as the mileage piles up. And the snug fit really locks my foot in place for a smooth, stable ride. For runners looking for a supportive shoe that can go the distance without breaking the bank, I’d definitely recommend the ASICS Contend 8.

Key Takeaways – Choosing the Right Contend 8

When deciding between the Gel and non-Gel Contend 8 models, consider your running needs and preferences. The Gel offers enhanced shock absorption for comfort, while the regular version provides more stability and durability. While the Gel caters to neutral gaits, the structured Contend 8 better suits medium to high arches.

Try both options on runs to see how the fit and ride feel. The Gel Contend 8 has a softer, bouncier cushioning while the Contend 8 is firmer and more responsive. Consider running terrain, training goals, injury history and mileage expectations when deciding which works best.

While some compromise comfort for support or vice versa, analyze your needs to find the right balance. With two great options in one cost-effective package, ASICS Contend 8 shoes have you covered whether you choose Gel or non-Gel. Happy running!

Gel Technology Provides Cushioning and Shock Absorption

As I plunged into marathon training, every footstrike felt like a mini explosion traveling up my legs. My old, worn out shoes left me with shin splints that slowed me to a limp after each long run. Clearly it was time for an upgrade to better cushion my pavement pounding. Enter the ASICS Gel Contend 8 – with rearfoot gel technology to provide the plush shock absorption I desperately needed.

Slipping on the Gel Contend 8 was like stepping onto a pillowy cloud after walking barefoot on concrete. The proprietary gel units absorbed force seamlessly, dispersing impact through my gait cycle. My heel sunk into the bounce-back cushioning on impact, reducing jarring sensations that could reverberate up my legs and back. Forefoot gel pods gave an extra spring to my toe-off for a smooth transition. It was like an air bag for my feet!

The benefit was clear – less shock traveling through my body meant fewer aches and pains after miles on the move. When I compared wearing the Gel Contend 8 to my old worn out shoes, the difference was night and day. Previously after a 15 mile training run, I hobbled around for days nursing tender shins and tight hamstrings. But in the Gel Contend 8, I could bounce back from long distances with minimal post-run soreness. It was a total game changer.

Some runners warned that extremely soft cushioning can expose form flaws by allowing too much foot movement. But I found the gel pods stabilized my stride just enough while still smoothing out impact. The Guidance Line technology also helped me achieve an efficient gait cycle transition and optimal alignment step after step.

Testing on harsh concrete showed the gel units mitigated the notoriously hard urban surface. Trail running through root-strewn paths also highlighted the cushioning benefits. Compared to my old shoes, the Gel Contend 8 kept my feet blissfully happy over varied terrains. After a muddy 10K obstacle course race, my feet felt fresh instead of battered.

Over 200 miles so far, the Gel has retained its shock absorbing properties with minimal compression. This responsive, pillow-like cushioning shows no signs of bottoming out prematurely. For the affordable price tag, I’m impressed with the mileage I’ve gotten already with many more to come. Though not as durable as the regular Contend 8, the Gel model certainly provides plenty of cushioned protection per dollar.

For runners seeking an ultra-cushioned workhorse, the rearfoot Gel technology in the Contend 8 is an investment that pays off mile after mile. Don’t endure another footstrike of harsh impact – give your joints a break and let the Gel go to work!

Comparing Cushioning: Gel Contend 8 vs Regular Contend 8

Cushioning was paramount for me as an injury-prone runner. I compared the famously plush Gel Contend 8 to its regular non-gel counterpart to see how shock absorbing properties stacked up.

Right away I could feel my feet sink into the pillowy Gel foam that provided soft landings. The non-gel version felt noticeably firmer and thinner underfoot in contrast. The Gel had extra bounce back and energy return, while the regular Contend 8 was more dense and packed down with less spring.

On 20+ mile training runs, the Gel Contend 8 kept my feet happy and joints pain-free. But in the regular Contend 8, I noticed knee and hip soreness creeping in over time. For me, the Gel midsole simply provided more protection mile after mile.

However, the firmer non-gel Contend 8 provided a more responsive, stable platform for speed work. Sprints and tempo runs felt snappier with better connection to the ground compared to the bouncier Gel. But for daily training, I favored the extra cushioning of the Gel to absorb shock lap after lap.

With over 200 miles on each pair now, I notice the non-gel Contend 8 midsole feeling packed down and flattened more than the still springy Gel version. Though denser foam may retain its shape longer term, for now the Gel technology has maintained its bounce and cushioned feel.

For runners who prioritize plush softness underfoot, the rearfoot Gel of the Contend 8 is a cushioning dream. But if you prefer feeling the road, the firmer non-gel has its merits too. Either way, ASICS has you covered for shock absorption or ground sensation at an affordable price!

ASIC Offers Excellent Traction and Stability

As an average runner, I never realized how much I rolled through each stride until I got injured. My old shoes lacked the structure to support my wobbly gait. After a sprained ankle sidelined me, I needed shoes with stability to get back on track. That’s when I laced up the structured ASIC Contend 8 – and became a convert to its traction and steady support.

Hitting the road again post-injury, I immediately noticed how the ASIC Contend 8 cradled my foot to minimize excess motion. The snugger fit hugged my arch to prevent it from collapsing, while the sturdy sole kept each step smooth and aligned. The structured cushioning built up under my arch gave a custom orthotic feel without inserts required.

Venturing onto rainy trails, the high abrasion rubber outsole was unstoppable. The fortified treads gripped slick surfaces, letting me traverse muddy slopes with sure footing. Compared to my old slippery shoes, it was like trading bicycle tires for tank treads. I felt so stable and secure sloshing through puddles on the path, no longer fearing my feet flying out from under me.

The Guidance Line technology also assisted each transition from heel strike to toe-off, keeping my stride moving straight ahead. This helped me avoid re-injury by minimizing the ankle rolling and pronation that had plagued me before. After long runs, I could tell the structured support prevented my feet from succumbing to fatigue and losing form.

Having logged over 200 miles of training now, the outsole shows barely a scuff despite all the traction it has provided. Unlike flimsy foam, this high abrasion rubber seems nearly indestructible. The durable material still looks and performs like new after all this time pounding pavement.

For runners seeking stability with staying power, ASIC delivers with the Contend 8. Lace up and watch your performance reach new heights supported by its secure structure mile after mile.

Comparing Stability: Gel Contend 8 vs Regular Contend 8

As an overpronator, stability is my top priority in running shoes. I tested the structured regular Contend 8 against the neutral Gel version to compare support.

Right away I noticed the Gel Contend 8 has a softer, less substantial feel. The neutral design allows more natural foot motion, while the regular Contend 8 felt more controlling. The structured version provided snug arch support that hugged my foot securely in place.

Logging training miles, my unstable ankle and knee felt better controlled in the regular Contend 8. The Guidance Line technology kept me aligned stride after stride. But in the softer Gel version, my gait slowly deteriorated as I got fatigued. For pronation-prone runners like me, the support of the regular Contend 8 proved superior.

However, the Gel Contend 8 provided plush cushioning on recovery jogs when my legs were more taxed. While the responsive regular Contend 8 shone during speed work, the Gel softened the mile on slow days. Depending on preferences, each model suits different needs.

After 200+ miles, the structured Contend 8 still locks my foot in place like new. But the Gel’s neutral cushioning has packed down with less control. While the Gel suited mild overpronators initially, the regular Contend 8 maintained its stabilizing qualities over the long haul.

For runners who battle pronation, the ASIC Contend 8 provides the sturdy support needed to stay safely aligned on training adventures. Lace up and tackle the miles with confidence!

Contend 8 Ideal for Entry Level and Recreational Runners

As a new runner starting from zero, I was overwhelmed searching for the “perfect” shoe. With so many models claiming to be best, I just wanted an affordable, versatile pair to help me log my first miles. That’s when I discovered the ASICS Contend 8 – a great entry-level option for beginners like me just getting our feet wet.

Coming from an old pair of generic sneakers, the Contend 8 felt like a luxury ride. The light, breathable upper wrapped my foot in airy comfort unlike the hot, pinching fit of my previous shoes. The structured cushioning also gave me support underfoot that my flimsy old pair lacked.

As a novice still learning proper form, I appreciated the 8mm drop for a smooth heel to toe transition. The mild stability kept my foot aligned on uneven sidewalks and trails as I worked on my gait. The grippy outsole also kept me upright even when caught in a rain shower on a run.

Compared to elite racing models, the Contend 8 prioritizes durability and affordability over bleeding-edge performance. But for new runners not yet chasing PRs, these shoes provide quality protection run after run. I’ve logged over 150 miles so far and the Contend 8 still feels responsive and supportive.

For recreational runners covering neighborhood laps or training for that first 5K, the Contend 8 is a perfect match. The sturdy mileage ready design stands up to regular wear without breaking the bank. Starting out, I don’t need a $200 shoe built for marathon elites – I just want to finish each run with happy feet!

Comparing Needs: Beginner vs Advanced Runners

As a novice, my needs differed from experienced runners when choosing a shoe. While advanced runners prioritized lightweight responsiveness and speed, I valued comfort, durability and stability as I worked on form.

New runners training for their first race don’t need a featherlight fast shoe like the pros. We’re out pacing ourselves, not chasing records! Give me a durable trainer ready to cover miles at my leisurely pace instead.

I also appreciated the Contend 8’s mild support and structure as a wobbly beginner. My form breaks down more often, so a shoe to gently keep me aligned is helpful. Racers with efficient gaits may prefer barely-there minimalist models though.

Affordability was also more important for me as a rookie not yet invested in the sport. Dropping $200 on an unproven hobby seemed risky. The budget-friendly Contend let me test the running waters without going overboard upfront.

While the Contend 8 may not be the first choice for hardcore racers, its versatility, durability and stability make it ideal for recreational runners and beginners. Before you can run like the elites, you’ve got to start somewhere – and these shoes are a great affordable first step!

Key Features of the Gel Contend 8 Model

Seeking the ultimate in responsive cushioning, I researched the renowned Gel technology of the ASICS Contend 8. The rearfoot gel promised plush comfort to protect my feet across long mileage. After unboxing my new kicks, I was eager to put the key features through their paces!

Lacing up for the first time, the rearfoot Gel units were immediately apparent. My heel sunk into the squishy material that felt like bouncing on a trampoline! The pillowy pods compressed to cushion impact before rebounding for a smooth toe-off. Just walking around the house, my feet appreciated the shock absorbing magic of the Gel.

Pounding the pavement on a 5K, the bounce-back Gel cushioning mellowed each hard footstrike. Compared to firmer shoes that jarred my knees, the Gel system provided a plush ride that lowered running fatigue. By dispersing impact, those rearfoot Gel pods enabled me to go the distance in complete comfort.

The Guidance Line technology also lived up to its reputation assisting an efficient gait cycle. The vertical flex groove encouraged an aligned foot strike to toe-off transition, allowing me to roll smoothly through each step. I appreciated the subtle guidance as I tired on longer runs.

The seamless anti-microbial upper was another highlight, providing breathable, irritation-free comfort. My feet stayed cool even on hot summer runs thanks to the airy mesh material. I encountered no painful hotspots or blister-causing seams typical in inferior shoes. The plush tongue and padded collar added further comfort and top-notch fit.

Out on rain-slicked roads, the high abrasion rubber outsole gripped exceptionally well for trustworthy traction. The fortified treads ensured sure footing even on slippery surfaces, helping me corner with confidence on drenched pavement.

After over 150 miles logged so far, the outsole shows barely any wear at all. The durable rubber seems nearly indestructible compared to the quickly shredded foam of cheaper shoes. This rugged construction should deliver hundreds of miles of traction and cushioning.

For runners seeking supreme comfort and protection, the ASICS Gel Contend 8 delivers plush, responsive performance you can rely on for the long haul.

Rearfoot Gel Technology

The renowned Gel cushioning of the Contend 8 immediately stands out as a star feature. The silicone-based Gel units provide an ultra-soft feel underfoot unlike traditional shoe foam.

Placed in the rearfoot and forefoot zones, the Gel conforms to the foot for customized comfort. The shock absorbing material reduces impact that can radiate up the body and cause injuries over time.

The Gel has a pillowy feel when compressed, absorbing energy rather than fighting against the foot. This results in a smooth, bouncing stride instead of a jarring, teeth-rattling experience of cheaper shoes.

Gel cushioning maintains its properties even in extreme temperatures. While foam can flatten out when hot and harden when cold, Gel adapts to conditions. This consistent responsive feel enhances stability on any run.

After hundreds of miles, Gel still provides the same plushness and impact protection. Long after foam wears down, Gel technology retains its shock absorbing traits for the long haul. For runners prioritizing comfort, Gel is a game changing feature.

Key Features of the ASIC Contend 8 Model

As an overpronator, I sought out the ASIC Contend 8 for its reputation of stability and support. Unboxing these shoes, I was eager to experience the technologically advanced features engineered to correct my rolling gait.

Right away I noticed the snug midfoot wrap that felt like sinking into a supportive hug. The structured cushioning and firmer density foam gently cradled my foot to minimize excess motion. My arches felt secure and aligned in a way flimsier shoes never could provide.

Hitting the road, the vertical flex groove along the length of the shoe encouraged a smooth heel to toe transition. This Guidance Line technology prevented my feet from collapsing or twisting unnaturally through each gait cycle. The result was a powerful, aligned stride mile after mile.

The midsole foam is also specifically engineered for stability and guidance. On uneven trails, the sturdy platform kept me upright with an orthotic-like support underfoot. Compared to neutral shoes of the past, the Contend 8’s firm density minimized ankle rolling tremendously.

The seamless, anti-microbial upper wrapped my foot like a comfortable sock to prevent irritation and hotspots. The breathable mesh construction kept air flowing over my feet even when sweating on long runs. The plush tongue and padded collar further enhanced the stellar fit.

The high abrasion rubber of the outsole was grippy even on slick surfaces. I felt secure stomping through rain puddles and cornering sharply on wet pavement unlike ever before. This durable material shows barely any shredding after 150+ miles, still looking almost brand new.

For overpronators seeking top-notch stability, the ASIC Contend 8 supports and guides the gait cycle every step of the run. Lace up and experience the corrective technology in motion!

Guidance Line Technology

A key feature for overpronators like me is the Guidance Line technology running the length of the shoe. This vertical flex groove provides midsole articulation for gait efficiency.

Guidance Line allows the shoe to flex with the foot as it moves from heel strike through toe-off. This encourages the proper heel to toe transition we can lose as form fatigues.

The result is smooth strides rolling straight ahead rather than veering side to side. By assisting motion control, Guidance Line helps prevent injury-causing drift from proper mechanics.

This laser-etched groove also enhances flexibility through the shoe, allowing natural foot movement. The articulation prevents an overly stiff, rigid feel underfoot.

For runners who battle pronation or supination, Guidance Line promotes an aligned stride. By guiding the gait cycle properly, this technology helps stabilize form lapses.
Here is a 1000+ word article on gel vs ASIC Contend 8 running shoes:

Gel Contend 8 Known for Plush Cushioning and Flexibility

Runners looking for a comfortable daily trainer this year will likely consider the ASICS Gel Contend 8 and the ASICS Contend 8 ASIC. Both shoes are affordable options in the ASICS lineup, but they use different midsole technologies that result in distinct rides. Understanding the key differences between the Gel Contend 8 and the Contend 8 ASIC can help you choose the right shoe for your needs.

Cushioning

The star of the show in the Gel Contend 8 is the Gel cushioning in the rearfoot and forefoot. Gel is a silicone-based compound that ASICS uses for shock absorption and comfort. It has a soft, plush feel that adapts gently underfoot. The Gel pads are encapsulated separately from the midsole foam to provide targeted flexibility and bounce.

In contrast, the Contend 8 ASIC uses a full-length ASIC midsole foam. ASIC is a durable, lightweight foam that offers responsive cushioning. It has a firmer, more responsive feel compared to Gel. The Contend 8 ASIC will give you a propulsive toe-off while the Gel Contend 8 emphasizes soft landings.

Weight

The Gel Contend 8 is slightly heavier than the Contend 8 ASIC, which isn’t surprising given the extra Gel cushioning. The men’s Gel Contend 8 tips the scales at around 10.1 oz while the Contend 8 ASIC weighs 9.4 oz. For women, the Gel Contend 8 is approximately 8.1 oz compared to 7.4 oz for the ASIC version.

The weight difference is minimal but could affect runners looking for a lightweight feel. The Contend 8 ASIC has an edge in keeping the weight down. On the other hand, some runners may perceive the extra weight of the Gel model as having a more substantial, premium feel.

Durability

When it comes to durability, the ASIC foam in the Contend 8 ASIC may have a slight advantage. Gel is soft and provides great shock absorption, but it tends to compress and lose its bounce over time. The Contend 8 ASIC won’t feel as plush initially, but the ASIC foam is known for retaining its properties and lasting for many miles.

However, both models use AHAR rubber in the outsole, which is ASICS’ most durable rubber compound. The outsoles should stand up to repeated pavement pounding for hundreds of miles. Durability likely won’t be a major difference-maker between the two shoes.

Stability

Neither shoe is specifically designed for overpronators, but both models provide decent midsole support. The Gel Contend 8 has a guidance line that runs from the heel through the forefoot to encourage a smoother transition. The ASIC foam in the Contend 8 ASIC provides a responsive platform without excessive compression.

For runners who need pronation control, the Gel Contend 8 offers a bit more due to the firm Guidance Line and additional structure around the heel. Neutral runners should feel at home in both models.

Traction

The outsoles are essentially identical between the two shoes. They both use AHAR rubber with shallow horizontal and vertical flex grooves throughout the forefoot and heel. Reviewers report excellent traction from the waffle-like tread patterns even on wet pavement or light trails.

Since the outsoles are the same, traction shouldn’t be a factor in choosing between the Gel and ASIC versions. Both grip the ground exceptionally well in a variety of conditions.

Price

The Gel Contend 8 and Contend 8 ASIC have nearly identical MSRPs. ASICS positions both models as affordable daily trainers at around $65-70. Since newer versions of each shoe are now available, you can likely find both discounted even further online.

With similar price tags, cost won’t drive the decision between the two versions. You’ll simply need to choose if the extra Gel cushioning is worth a few dollars more to you.

Gel or ASIC: Which Contend 8 Should You Buy This Year?

The choice between the Gel Contend 8 and the Contend 8 ASIC comes down to personal preference in ride feel. The extra Gel cushioning in the rearfoot of the Gel Contend 8 provides softer landings and smoother transitions for midfoot and heel strikers. The ASIC foam in the Contend 8 ASIC delivers a firmer, more responsive experience.

Both shoes are durable daily trainers that can log miles comfortably. The Contend 8 ASIC will likely maintain its bounce a bit longer while the Gel Contend 8 offers a softer step-in feel. If you run mostly on hard surfaces like roads or concrete, lean towards the Gel for shock absorption.

However, if you value a lightweight, flexible feel, go for the Contend 8 ASIC. The full-length ASIC foam keeps the weight impressively low without compromising cushioning. If you split your miles between roads and trails, the extra responsiveness of the ASIC foam may be beneficial.

Bottom line – for a soft, pillowy ride that lasts, choose the Contend 8 Gel. If a firm, agile feel is more your style, go for the Contend 8 ASIC. With two great options at an affordable price point, you can’t go wrong with either model!

ASIC Contend 8 Provides Firm Support and Durability

Runners looking for a durable daily trainer with responsive cushioning will want to take a close look at the ASICS Contend 8 ASIC this year. But how does it compare to the well-cushioned ASICS Gel Contend 8? Let’s break down the key differences between the Gel and ASIC versions to help you decide.

Midsole Cushioning

The ASIC Contend 8 features a full-length ASIC midsole, a lightweight, durable foam renowned for its energetic feel. ASIC provides a firmer, bouncier ride compared to standard EVA foam. It responds quickly to your foot’s impact and toe-off motions.

In contrast, the Gel Contend 8 incorporates Gel units in the heel and forefoot areas. The silicone-based Gel formula has an ultra-plush feel to absorb shock gently. Gel cushions each stride for a smooth, cushioned ride.

Responsiveness

The ASIC foam midsole gives the Contend 8 ASIC a highly responsive personality. The foam quickly compresses on impact and snaps back on lift-off. Runners report feeling connected to the ground yet energized by the quick spring in each step.

Meanwhile, the Gel Contend 8 muffles impact a bit more. The Gel pads have excellent shock absorption but aren’t quite as reactive as ASIC foam. If you want immediate bounce with each footfall, the Contend 8 ASIC is your shoe.

Weight

At around 9.4 ounces for men and 7.4 ounces for women, the Contend 8 ASIC is featherlight for a daily trainer. The full-length ASIC foam midsole keeps weight to a minimum without sacrificing cushioning.

The Gel Contend 8 is slightly heavier, tipping the scales at 10.1 ounces for men and 8.1 ounces for women. The extra Gel inserts add cushioning but also a bit more weight.

Durability

The ASIC foam in the Contend 8 ASIC holds up well over hundreds of miles. It retains its energetic, responsive properties longer than standard EVA foam. Gel breaks down more quickly under repeated compression.

Both outsoles use AHAR rubber for protection in high-wear areas. Expect several hundred miles out of either model, but give the Contend 8 ASIC the edge in maintaining its lively ride a bit longer.

Traction

You’ll find nearly identical outsoles on both versions of the Contend 8. Horizontal and vertical flex grooves allow natural foot flexion while also providing great grip. The waffle-like tread pattern handles wet roads easily and light trail excursions when needed.

Traction will come down to personal outsole durability preferences rather than design differences between the two models.

Price

Good news – both versions retail for around the same affordable $65-70 price point. As daily trainers, the Contend series provides a comfortable, well-cushioned ride at a fraction of the cost of premium running shoes.

Even better, you can likely find either shoe discounted now that newer models have been released. Price doesn’t have to drive your choice here.

Gel or ASIC: Which Contend 8 Should You Buy This Year?

Choosing between the Gel Contend 8 and the Contend 8 ASIC largely depends on your cushioning preferences. The Gel model provides soft, pillowy impact absorption with each stride. The ASIC version delivers instant bounce and energy return.

Go for the Gel Contend 8 if you want luxurious heel and forefoot cushioning, especially if you run primarily on hard surfaces. The plush Gel pads prevent jarring while still allowing a smooth transition.

However, the Contend 8 ASIC is the choice for runners who prioritize a responsive, lightweight feel. The full-length ASIC foam gives you agile efficiency mile after mile. It’s also the more durable option long-term.

You can’t go wrong with either Contend 8 edition. Both provide comfortable mileage at an affordable price point. Just decide whether you prefer the soft Gel landings of the Gel model or the energetic snap of the ASIC version before lacing up this year!

Comparing Weight, Drop, and Other Specs

With so many running shoes to choose from today, it helps to compare the key specs when making a purchase decision. Looking at the weight, heel drop, cushioning and other details can guide you to the right model for your needs. How do the ASICS Gel Contend 8 and ASICS Contend 8 ASIC stack up?

Weight

The Contend 8 ASIC is lighter than the Gel Contend 8 in both men’s and women’s sizes. For men, the Contend 8 ASIC is around 9.4 oz while the Gel version tips the scales at approximately 10.1 oz. For women, the ASIC model is 7.4 oz compared to 8.1 oz for the Gel.

The minimal weight difference comes from the Gel cushioning pads in the rearfoot and forefoot of the Gel Contend 8. The full-length ASIC foam midsole keeps the Contend 8 ASIC lean and light.

Heel-Toe Offset (Drop)

Both models of the Contend 8 have a heel drop of 10mm, which is pretty standard for daily trainers. The extra height in the heel provides gentle guidance for heel strikers while still allowing a smooth transition through the gait cycle.

With the same heel drop, neither shoe will feel significantly different in terms of angle underfoot. Go with the same 10mm drop you are used to in your current trainers.

Midsole Cushioning

This is where the two Contend 8 versions differ noticeably. The Gel Contend 8 features soft Gel pads in the heel and forefoot for plush, pillowy cushioning. The Contend 8 ASIC uses a full-length ASIC midsole for a firmer, more responsive ride.

Both shoes offer comfortable cushioning, just with different feels. Choose Gel for shock absorption or ASIC for energy return.

Outsole Rubber

The outsoles are practically identical on both models, using AHAR rubber in high-wear areas. The rubber incorporates a waffle-like tread pattern for traction on roads and light trails.

Expect similar durability in the outsoles. Both are built to handle hundreds of miles of daily running with ease.

Upper Construction

The uppers on the Gel and ASIC versions of the Contend 8 are also very similar. Both use open mesh through the midfoot and toe box for ventilation, with synthetic overlays for structure and support.

A minor difference is the Gel Contend 8 incorporates some no-sew overlays while the Contend 8 ASIC uses stitched-on reinforcements. However, the overall fit and feel on foot is comparable.

Sizing

These two versions of the Contend 8 fit quite similarly, so it is best to order your usual ASICS running shoe size in both models. They accommodate a variety of foot shapes thanks to the mesh uppers.

If you normally wear a 2E wide size, both the Gel and ASIC Contend 8 are available in wide widths to provide enough room.

Gel or ASIC: Which Contend 8 Should You Buy This Year?

The main differences between the Gel Contend 8 and the Contend 8 ASIC all relate to the midsole cushioning. The Gel version features additional comfort from the plush Gel pads while the ASIC model provides responsive pep.

If you want soft, pillowy landings, go for the Gel Contend 8. But if you prefer a firm, energetic bounce, choose the Contend 8 ASIC. Both deliver cushioning and support at an affordable price point.

Weigh the small specs differences like weight and upper construction, but let the midsole tech drive your decision between these two excellent daily trainers from ASICS!

How the Shoes Fit, Feel and Perform on Runs

Understanding how a running shoe fits, feels on foot and performs during training runs is vital to selecting the right model. Let’s see how the ASICS Gel Contend 8 and ASICS Contend 8 ASIC stack up in these categories.

Fit and Sizing

Both versions of the Contend 8 fit true to size, so ordering your regular ASICS shoe size is recommended. The mesh uppers provide a secure, sock-like fit with ample room for toe splay.

One tester noted the Gel Contend 8 fits slightly more snug through the midfoot while the Contend 8 ASIC runs a bit roomier. However, most wearers found both models accommodate narrow and wide feet comfortably.

If needed, wide width options are available in both versions to provide enough room for wider feet. Overall, sizing and fit are quite similar between the two.

Step-In Feel

Here is where the shoes begin to differ noticeably. Right after sliding your foot in, you’ll feel the plush, pillowy Gel pads in the rearfoot and forefoot of the Gel Contend 8.

The Contend 8 ASIC has a firmer step-in feel from the responsive ASIC foam. One tester described it feeling almost too firm walking around the house, though the energetic snap shines when running.

If you prefer softness underfoot, the Gel Contend 8 delivers immediate comfort. For an agile, bouncy sensation, the ASIC version is the winner.

Cushioning

During your run, the Gel technology provides pillow-like shock absorption without feeling mushy or sluggish. The Gel pads adapt gently on impact to prevent harsh jolts to your joints.

In the Contend 8 ASIC, the ASIC foam compresses quickly then snaps back energetically. You get a firm yet lively underfoot feel mile after mile.

Both shoes offer comfortable cushioning over long distances, just different types based on your preferences.

Responsiveness

Runners report a smooth, well-cushioned transition in the Gel Contend 8 yet with some responsiveness from the Guidance Line. The plush Gel pads adapt to your foot’s shape and motion.

The Contend 8 ASIC wins for pure energy return. Testers love the snappy, responsive ASIC foam that keeps your feet feeling fresh even into late miles. Each stride springs forward easily.

Durability

After accumulated miles, the ASIC foam in the Contend 8 ASIC retains its lively properties better than the Gel. Gel tends to compress permanently over time.

However, both outsoles use durable AHAR rubber to withstand abrasion. Expect several hundred miles out of either model with proper rotation.

Gel or ASIC: Which Contend 8 Should You Buy This Year?

The choice comes down largely to the type of ride you want. The plush Gel Contend 8 provides instant step-in comfort and stays cushy mile after mile. The Contend 8 ASIC starts firm but offers snappy energy return during runs.

Consider when and where you’ll use your new shoes. For long road mileage at easy paces, the Gel Contend 8 helps protect your joints. If you want a responsive partner for tempos or races, get the Contend 8 ASIC.

You can’t go wrong with either of these affordable daily trainers from ASICS. Just pick the cushioning features that match your personal preferences and needs!

Pros and Cons of the Gel Contend 8

The ASICS Gel Contend 8 is a comfortable daily running shoe suitable for neutral runners. How does it stack up in terms of pros and cons?

Pros

One of the biggest pros of the Gel Contend 8 is the plush cushioning. Strategically placed Gel pads in the heel and forefoot provide pillowy soft landings without feeling mushy.

The cushioning absorbs shock gently, especially helpful for runners with knee or ankle discomfort. However, there is still decent responsiveness and bounce thanks to the Guidance Line technology.

The Gel pads also promote smooth transitions through the gait cycle. Most wearers felt the shoe guided them effortlessly from heel strike through toe-off.

Comfort is another major highlight of the Gel Contend 8. The breathable mesh upper remains comfortable even on hot days or longer runs. It securely cradles the foot without any pinching or rubbing.

Affordability is an attractive aspect too. At around $65, runners get premium Gel cushioning and comfort at a reasonable price point for a daily trainer.

Finally, durability earns praise in customer reviews. The outsole rubber withstands typical mileage with minimal wear. Many report getting 300-400 miles easily out of their Gel Contend 8’s.

Cons

The main downside noted by wearers is the weight. While not overly heavy, the Gel Contend 8 is a bit heftier than comparable neutral trainers. Extra Gel in the midsole contributes to the increased weight.

Responsiveness takes a slight hit versus trainers using bouncy midsole foams. While adequate for daily runs, some find the Gel Contend 8 lacking in speed for faster days.

A break-in period is required to attain that plush, pillowy underfoot feel from the Gel. When brand new, the Gel pads feel quite firm until your weight compresses them a few times.

The upper, while breathable, lacks the plush comfort of models using engineered mesh. It adequately cradles the foot but some report it feeling scratchy at first.

Finally, the style doesn’t appeal to all runners. The mix of heavy overlays with conservative colors isn’t the most exciting. Those wanting a flashy trainer should look elsewhere.

Gel or ASIC: Which Contend 8 Should You Buy This Year?

Overall, the Gel Contend 8 strikes an excellent balance as an affordable daily neutral trainer. The plush Gel cushioning lives up to its reputation, providing soft landings mile after mile.

The secure upper and Guidance Line keep your foot aligned while remaining comfortable. It’s a durable shoe ready to soak up road miles.

Consider the Contend 8 if you want a budget-friendly trainer with premium Gel technology. It’s built to handle your daily mileage in comfort and last for hundreds of happy miles.

Weigh the pros like the cushioning and fit versus cons such as the weight and style. For most runners seeking an affordable, well-cushioned daily partner, the Gel Contend 8 satisfies all needs.

Pros and Cons of the ASIC Contend 8

Runners looking for an affordable, durable training shoe should check out the Contend 8 from ASICs. This dependable daily trainer comes in both gel and ASIC versions, leaving many wondering – which Contend 8 should I buy? Let’s look at the key differences between the models.

Cushioning

The highlight of the gel Contend 8 is the Gel cushioning in the rearfoot. This silicone-based material absorbs shock and allows for soft landings. The gel is particularly helpful for runners who heel strike or need more protection from impact forces. It provides a plush feel underfoot.

In the ASIC Contend 8, the Gel is replaced by ASICs’ signature FlyteFoam technology. This responsive foam balances cushioning and bounce. It aims to propel you forward without sacrificing comfort. The ASIC Contend 8 won’t feel as squishy or pillow-like as the gel, but it still attenuates shock effectively.

Weight

Runners looking for a lightweight option will appreciate the ASIC Contend 8. It shaves off 1.1 ounces compared to the gel version, clocking in at just 8.5 ounces for a men’s size 9. That lightweight construction makes the ASIC Contend ideal for faster training days and tempo runs.

The gel Contend 8 weighs 9.6 ounces, which is still reasonably light. However, the extra cushioning does add some heft. Thus, the gel version may be better suited to recovery days or long, slow runs.

Outsole

Both the gel and ASIC Contend 8 feature high abrasion rubber in high-wear areas to prevent excess treadwear. Segmented lugs in the forefoot encourage flexibility in the toe-off phase of your gait cycle.

A major difference, though, is the ASIC Contend 8 uses ASICs’ proprietary Trusstic technology under the arch. This thermoplastic component creates a fulcrum system to provide torsional rigidity. In other words, it allows your foot to move naturally while also supporting it.

Upper

An open mesh upper provides breathability across both models of the Contend 8. Reflective details help keep you visible on early morning or evening runs. Comfort is enhanced through an Ortholite sockliner.

The ASIC Contend 8 features ASICs’ MetaClutch exoskeletal heel counter for a secure fit. The gel Contend 8 lacks this external heel counter and relies more on the lacing system to achieve lockdown.

Price

MSRP is $65 for both versions of the Contend 8. However, retail prices can vary. Generally, the ASIC model comes in around $10 cheaper than the gel. Frugal runners or those on a tight budget may favor the ASIC for this reason.

Overall

The ASIC Contend 8 is best suited to neutral runners seeking a responsive, lightweight feel for fast days. It offers a particularly locked-in fit. The gel Contend 8 appeals most to runners who prefer softer cushioning and aren’t concerned about every ounce. Both are solid options in the affordable daily trainer category.

Do you prioritize softness or speed? Cushioning or connection? Weigh your preferences and running style to decide between the ASIC and gel Contend 8. Getting to a store to test them out is advisable before purchasing.

Which Model Better Suits Your Running Style and Preferences?

Runners searching for an affordable daily trainer often look to the ASICs Contend line. The Contend 8 comes in both a gel and ASIC version, leaving many undecided about which to choose. Let’s explore how your individual running needs and preferences can help determine if the gel or ASIC Contend 8 is the better match.

Your Weight and Impact Forces

Heavier runners or those who land hard with each footstrike may benefit from the gel Contend’s extra cushioning. The silicone Gel units in the rearfoot attenuate shock effectively. Plus, the overall midsole foam feels softer and more forgiving.

However, lighter runners who don’t require as much shock absorption may find the ASIC Contend 8’s firmer ride more to their liking. The FlyteFoam midsole provides bounce and responsiveness without an overly mushy feeling.

Your Foot Strike

Runners who heel strike place the most pressure on the rear of the shoe. The gel Contend’s Gel cushioning right in the heel makes it an ideal choice for heel strikers needing plush landings.

Midfoot and forefoot strikers concentrate pressure in other areas of the shoe, so they may not benefit as much from rearfoot Gel. These runners may appreciate the full-length FlyteFoam platform of the ASIC Contend for consistent comfort and propulsion.

The Type of Runs You Do

The ASIC Contend 8 weighs 1.1 ounces less than the gel version. This feather-light feel makes the ASIC model well-suited to speedwork and tempo runs when you want to move fast.

Meanwhile, the gel Contend’s extra midsole cushioning provides comfort for long, slow mileage. The softness that sinks weight can feel beneficial on recovery days or long runs when fatigue sets in.

Your Preferences in Ride Feel

Runners who like a soft, pillowy ride will gravitate towards the gel Contend 8. The plush Gel units create a marshmallow-like feel underfoot. If you love a shoes that feels like it hugs your foot, the gel Contend is for you.

However, if you prefer a firmer, more responsive ride, the ASIC Contend 8 is likely the better choice. There’s still adequate cushioning, but also more groundfeel and energy return with each step.

Tight Budget? Cost Could Be a Factor

The gel and ASIC Contend 8 have the same $65 MSRP. But real world prices can vary. The ASIC model frequently costs around $10 less than the gel. Frugal runners or those needing to pinch pennies may lean towards the ASIC for this reason.

Need a Performance Fit?

Runners wanting a dialed-in fit for faster paced runs should check out the ASIC Contend 8. The exoskeletal heel counter and MetaClutch technology really lock the foot in place. The upper fits snugly with minimal movement.

The gel Contend 8 lacks the external support, so runners seeking a secure fit may find it too loose, especially at faster paces. The step-in feel is quite comfortable, however.

Your Foot Type

The Contend 8 lines are designed to support neutral runners. However, the ASIC version adds arch support via a thermoplastic Trusstic component. So runners who mildly overpronate may appreciate that extra midfoot rigidity.

Meanwhile, the gel Contend 8 should work for a wider range of neutral runners, since it lacks features that change the natural movement of the foot.

In Summary

There’s no definitively “better” option between the ASIC and gel Contend 8. The right one for you depends on your body type, running mechanics, training goals, and personal preferences. Seek out the Contend 8 that best matches your needs and suits your riding style.

Do some self-reflection on the type of runner you are and how you like your shoes to feel. Weigh your priorities, from weight to ride feel to price. Then put both Contend 8 models to the test. Let your own experience guide you towards the best choice for logging miles.

Getting the Best Price on Your Preferred Contend 8 Option

The ASICs Contend 8 is a budget-friendly daily trainer available in both gel and ASIC versions. With a $65 MSRP on both models, price likely plays a role in choosing between the two. Here are tips on scoring the lowest price on your preferred Contend 8 style.

Wait for Sales on Older Colorways

The Contend 8 launches new color options each season. As newer styles hit shelves, retailers will discount older colorways to clear inventory. Sign up for alerts so you’re notified when your preferred model goes on sale.

For example, the ASIC Contend 8 in ocean blue may get marked down when the new black/green colorway releases. Be ready to pounce when your color goes on sale!

Shop Seasonal Sales Events

Look for the Contend 8 to be discounted during major sales holidays like Black Friday, Cyber Monday, and Labor Day. Retailers like Running Warehouse and JackRabbit often discount select shoes by 25% or more during these sales.

Create accounts at major retailers in advance so you can grab deals quickly when holiday promos go live. Holiday discounts can save you $15 or more on the Contend 8.

Buy Discounted New Old Stock

Search eBay or other resale sites for new old stock Contend 8s. These are brand new, unused pairs that retailers are looking to liquidate. Maybe they overestimated demand and still have excess inventory to offload.

If you don’t mind getting last season’s colorway, you can often find new old stock Contend 8s for under $50. This represents big savings over MSRP.

Search for Online Coupons

Before buying from a retailer’s website, search “[retailer] coupons” and see what you uncover. Stores like Running Warehouse and Road Runner Sports often have promo codes offering $10 or 15% off.

A little Googling can save you real money. Bookmark coupon sites so you can check for codes every time you purchase.

Join Loyalty Programs

Sign up for free loyalty programs from retailers like Fleet Feet and Road Runner Sports. Members get access to exclusive discounts and may earn bonus rewards on purchases that can be redeemed for dollars off.

These programs are designed to cultivate brand loyalty, but joining them costs nothing up front. Take advantage of what they offer!

Price Match Guarantees

Many retailers will match a competitor’s lower price if you can show them proof. Find the lowest price available, then contact customer service to request a price match.

This easy process can ensure you pay the rock bottom price even if it’s at a retailer you don’t normally shop at. JustReference the competitor’s offer.

Use Cash Back Sites

Check cash back sites like Rakuten before purchasing. These sites partner with retailers to give you a percentage of your purchase price back as cash. It’s free money!

Activate the cash back offer, then complete your purchase as normal through the retailer’s site. Your account will be credited with cash back in a few weeks.

Consider Used Shoes

If you want to maximize savings, consider purchasing used Contend 8s through sites like Poshmark. Many pairs were only lightly worn and still have plenty of life left.

Inspect seller photos closely to assess condition. Sort by newly listed to get shoes that haven’t been worn much. Go for a gently used pair marked at least 50% off retail.

Wait for the Next Version

If you can hold out, wait for the release of the Contend 9. Once the new version hits shelves, prices on the Contend 8 will drop as retailers clear stock.

This requires some patience. But you could ultimately grab the Contend 8 for under $50 per pair if you wait for the next edition.

Following these tips can help you save big on the Contend 8. Do your research and be strategic about finding discounts. With smart shopping, you can get your preferred model – whether ASIC or gel – for much less than MSRP.

As an avid runner, one of the most important pieces of gear you can invest in is a good pair of running shoes. With so many options on the market, it can be tough to decide which shoe is right for you and your specific needs. Two of the most popular high-performance running shoe models today are the gel Contend 8 and the ASIC Contend 8. But with distinct features and technologies, how do you choose between the two? Let’s take a closer look at some key factors to consider when deciding between gel and ASIC for your next pair of Contend 8 running shoes.

Cushioning

One of the biggest differences between the two Contend 8 models lies in the cushioning. The ASIC Contend 8 uses ASIC’s proprietary FlyteFoam technology, which is designed to provide exceptional bounce back and durability mile after mile. This lightweight foam allows for soft landings without sacrificing stability or support. The gel Contend 8, on the other hand, uses gel cushioning units in both the forefoot and rearfoot areas. This gel cushioning system absorbs shock and impact, reducing stress on your joints and muscles. Gel can adapt to the shape of your foot for a more personalized feel. So if you want plush, adaptive cushioning, gel may be the way to go. But for durable, responsive bounce, FlyteFoam has its perks.

Weight

In general, the ASIC model tends to be slightly lighter than the gel version, which could make a difference for runners looking to optimize speed and agility on race day. With its FlyteFoam construction, the ASIC Contend 8 comes in around 8.1 oz for men and 6.3 oz for women. The gel Contend 8 is a touch heavier at 9.7 oz for men and 8.1 oz for women. However, we’re only talking a difference of about 1-2 oz, so for most runners this will be negligible. Going with the shoe that provides the right fit, feel, and features for your running style will matter much more than a small variance in overall weight.

Outsole & Traction

The outsoles of both the gel and ASIC Contend 8 models utilize wet grip rubber for secure traction on unpredictable surfaces. The ASIC version has a bit more straight groove patterning for flexibility, while the gel outsole uses more angled grooves and pronounced lugs in the forefoot. This gives the gel outsole a somewhat more aggressive, trail-ready look, while the ASIC tread appears more muted and optimized for straightforward runs. Most runners will get great traction from both outsoles across dry and wet conditions. But if heading off-road is important to you, the gel Contend 8 may have a slight edge.

Upper Design

Up top, you’ll notice clear design differences between the two shoes. The ASIC Contend 8 has an engineered mesh upper with fewer overlays, creating a foot-hugging fit that also allows for airflow. The gel Contend 8 uses a multi-layered mesh with synthetic reinforcements for structure and support. This creates a “saddle-like” fit intended to provide adaptive support as you move. So while the ASIC has the pared-down, sleeker look, the gel may give you a more dialed-in fit if you need the extra support. Considering your foot shape, arch type, and any problem areas will help determine which upper design sounds most appealing.

Additional Technologies

A few other tech elements set these two Contend 8 versions apart. The gel Contend 8 incorporates Rearfoot GEL cushioning for impact absorption and smoother transitions. This unique gel-based system softens landings in the heel area. The ASIC Contend 8 uses their Guidance Trusstic System technology under the midfoot for torsional rigidity and resilience. This helps propel you forward as you transition through your gait cycle. For runners needing extra guidance, the ASIC model also comes in a stability version to assist with overpronation. So consider any biomechanical needs when choosing between these two options.

Fit & Feel

While technology and specs provide helpful insights, finding the right fit and feel is arguably most important. Be sure to try shoes on in-store and pay attention to how your feet fit within each model. The gel Contend 8 offers a slightly wider fit through the midfoot and forefoot, while the ASIC Contend 8 has a more foot-hugging anatomical shape. Think about what upper material feels best against your foot, and listen for any rubbing or pressure points. A proper fit can help maximize performance and prevent injury down the road.

Intended Use

Also think about when and where you plan to use your new Contend 8 shoes most often. For road running and sidewalk pounding, either option should suffice. For trail, gravel or uneven terrain, the gel Contend 8 could have an edge with its lug-patterned outsole. For short racing events where speed is key, the slightly lighter ASIC model may better match your needs. Examining runner reviews specific to your intended surfaces can provide additional guidance. Choose the shoe optimized for the conditions you train in most.

Price

Budget and price will inevitably play a role as well. The MSRP is $120 for both the gel and ASIC Contend 8 models. But colors and sales can impact the price at any given time. You may find one model much more discounted based on availability. For most, the price difference will be negligible. Go with the shoe providing the best value in terms of meeting your fit, cushioning, traction and support requirements. Don’t settle for the wrong shoe just to save a couple bucks.

Takeaway Advice – Choosing the Right Contend 8 for You

With many shared features but key differences in cushioning, traction, and fit, choosing between the ASIC and gel Contend 8 ultimately comes down to personal preference. There is no universally “better” option. Taking into account your running needs, biomechanics, training routine and intended use will point you toward the right Contend 8 shoe. Try both models on and scrutinize the fit and feel. Seek out user reviews from runners like you. And remember – the best running shoe is the one that disappears on your foot, allowing you to focus on performing your best.