How do the Hero 2.0 Mesh and ECD 2.0 lacrosse heads compare. What are the key features of each head. Which head offers better performance for different playing styles. How have these heads revolutionized the game of lacrosse.
The Evolution of Lacrosse Heads: From Wood to High-Tech Mesh
The world of lacrosse has undergone a remarkable transformation since the days of traditional wooden sticks. Modern lacrosse heads have become marvels of engineering, featuring intricate pocket patterns and scoops designed specifically for optimal handling, passing, and shooting. The shift from wooden sticks to synthetic heads marked a pivotal moment in the sport’s history, ushering in an era of unprecedented performance and customization.
One of the most significant advancements in lacrosse head technology was the introduction of molded heads with open sidewall designs. These heads, constructed from durable yet flexible materials like plastic polymers, revolutionized the game by offering players enhanced control and power. The incorporation of mesh pockets into these synthetic heads further elevated their performance, providing more consistent pocket depth, improved ball control, and increased ball speed on passes and shots.
Key Advancements in Lacrosse Head Design
- Open sidewall designs for improved stringing options
- Durable and flexible plastic polymer construction
- Mesh pockets for consistent pocket depth and ball control
- Optimized head shapes for specific playing styles and positions
- Enhanced scoop angles for improved ground ball pickups
As lacrosse head technology continued to evolve, manufacturers began fine-tuning various aspects of their designs. Players soon became familiar with terms like “pinched heads,” “hourglass rails,” and “high scoops,” each offering unique benefits for different playing styles and positions. This level of customization allowed players to choose heads that perfectly complemented their individual techniques and on-field roles.
ECD Lacrosse: Pioneers of Synthetic Head Innovation
ECD Lacrosse, formerly known as Edge Composites Design, played a crucial role in the development of synthetic lacrosse heads. Their groundbreaking Brave head, introduced in 2006, quickly gained popularity among players and set a new standard for lacrosse head design.
What made the ECD Brave so revolutionary? The head featured a radical open sidewall design, curved scoop, and pinched round ball stop. These elements combined to create a lightweight head that offered excellent ball control and facilitated quick, accurate passing and shooting. As one of the first heads optimized for mesh pockets, the Brave represented a quantum leap in lacrosse technology.
ECD’s Impact on Lacrosse Head Evolution
- Introduction of the Brave head in 2006
- Open sidewall design for improved stringing options
- Curved scoop for enhanced ball control
- Pinched round ball stop for increased accuracy
- Optimization for mesh pockets
The success of the Brave head paved the way for wider adoption of synthetic heads with advanced geometries. ECD continued to innovate, introducing subsequent models such as the Rebel, Rebel O, and Rebel Offense. These heads built upon the Brave’s template, further refining the design to meet the evolving needs of players.
The Hero Mesh Revolution: A New Era in Pocket Performance
Despite the significant advancements made by ECD and other manufacturers, traditional mesh pockets still had some limitations. Issues such as bagging out over time, difficulty maintaining pocket depth and shape, and inconsistent sidewall stiffness persisted. Enter Hero Mesh – a revolutionary new pocket technology designed to address these challenges head-on.
Hero Mesh represented an evolutionary leap beyond traditional mesh, offering a next-generation woven pocket with superior structure and feel. By eliminating mesh distortion and inconsistent shooting, Hero Mesh dramatically improved pocket performance, enhancing ball control, feel, and hold.
Advantages of Hero Mesh Technology
- Improved pocket structure and consistency
- Enhanced ball control and feel
- Reduced mesh distortion and bagging
- Increased shooting accuracy
- Better maintenance of pocket depth and shape
The true potential of Hero Mesh was realized when it was implemented in a redesigned head. After years of research and development, Hero Lacrosse launched the Hero 2.0 head in 2021, specifically optimized for use with Hero Mesh. This head featured a stiff open sidewall and strategically placed stringing holes, allowing players to customize the deepest legal pockets possible with unparalleled consistency.
The Hero 2.0: Engineered for Next-Gen Woven Pockets
The Hero 2.0 head represented a significant leap forward in lacrosse head design, as it was engineered from the ground up to work seamlessly with next-generation woven pockets like Hero Mesh. This synergy between head and pocket technology resulted in a product that offered players unprecedented levels of control, consistency, and customization.
Key Features of the Hero 2.0 Head
- Stiff open sidewall design
- Strategically placed stringing holes
- Rounded edges for excellent ball handling
- Specially designed scoop for quick releases
- Optimized for use with Hero Mesh
The combination of the Hero 2.0 head and Hero Mesh pocket technology proved to be a game-changer for many players. The ability to create deep, consistent pockets with excellent ball control and quick release capabilities set a new standard for lacrosse head performance.
ECD’s Response: The ECD 2.0 Head
Not to be outdone by the success of the Hero 2.0, ECD Lacrosse responded by developing their own ground-up mesh head – the ECD 2.0. Building upon the popularity of their Rebel Offense model, ECD engineers set out to create a head that could compete directly with the Hero 2.0 while maintaining the signature features that had made their previous models so successful.
Innovative Features of the ECD 2.0
- Pinched, hourglass shape similar to the Rebel Offense
- Enhanced sidewall definition for improved flex and pocket support
- Extended runner for increased hold and control
- Optimized scoop angle, depth, and edges for improved ball handling
- Revamped rail system with rounded edges and reduced weight
The ECD 2.0 introduced several key innovations that set it apart from its predecessors. The enhanced sidewall definition allowed for fine-tuning of pocket placement and depth, while the stiff yet responsive design provided excellent support for mesh pockets. The extended runner improved hold and control, and the optimized scoop design facilitated quick releases and enhanced ball handling.
Head-to-Head Comparison: Hero 2.0 vs ECD 2.0
With both the Hero 2.0 and ECD 2.0 representing the cutting edge of mesh lacrosse head technology, players now have two elite options to choose from. But how do these heads compare in key performance areas?
Pocket Customization and Consistency
Both the Hero 2.0 and ECD 2.0 excel in this area, offering players the ability to create deep, consistent pockets. The Hero 2.0’s stiff open sidewall and strategic stringing holes give it a slight edge in terms of pocket customization, while the ECD 2.0’s enhanced sidewall definition provides excellent pocket support and adjustability.
Ball Control and Feel
The Hero 2.0, when paired with Hero Mesh, offers exceptional ball control and feel. However, the ECD 2.0’s extended runner and optimized scoop design provide excellent hold and control as well. This category is largely a matter of personal preference, as both heads perform admirably in this area.
Shooting and Passing Accuracy
Both heads are designed to improve shooting and passing accuracy. The Hero 2.0’s rounded edges and specially designed scoop facilitate quick releases, while the ECD 2.0’s optimized scoop angle and depth enhance ball handling and release. Players may find subtle differences in performance based on their individual shooting and passing styles.
Durability and Weight
The ECD 2.0 may have a slight advantage in terms of weight, thanks to its revamped rail system that removes unnecessary material. However, both heads are constructed from high-quality materials and are designed to withstand the rigors of competitive play.
Choosing the Right Head for Your Playing Style
When deciding between the Hero 2.0 and ECD 2.0, players should consider their individual playing style, position, and preferences. Both heads offer exceptional performance and represent the pinnacle of current lacrosse head technology.
Factors to Consider When Choosing a Lacrosse Head
- Playing position (attack, midfield, defense)
- Preferred pocket depth and style
- Shooting and passing techniques
- Ball control and handling preferences
- Level of play (recreational, competitive, professional)
Ultimately, the choice between the Hero 2.0 and ECD 2.0 may come down to subtle differences in feel and performance that resonate with individual players. Both heads have their strengths, and players may find that one suits their style slightly better than the other.
The Future of Lacrosse Head Technology
The development of the Hero 2.0 and ECD 2.0 heads represents a significant milestone in the evolution of lacrosse equipment. As manufacturers continue to push the boundaries of design and materials science, we can expect to see even more innovative features and performance enhancements in future lacrosse heads.
Potential Areas for Future Innovation
- Advanced materials for improved durability and weight reduction
- Smart technology integration for performance tracking
- Further optimization of head shapes for specific playing styles
- Enhanced customization options for pocket depth and placement
- Improved sustainability in manufacturing processes
As the sport of lacrosse continues to grow and evolve, so too will the technology behind the equipment. The Hero 2.0 and ECD 2.0 heads have set a new standard for performance and customization, and it will be exciting to see how future innovations build upon these advancements.
In conclusion, both the Hero 2.0 and ECD 2.0 lacrosse heads represent the pinnacle of current mesh head technology. Each offers unique features and benefits that cater to different playing styles and preferences. As players continue to push the limits of their performance on the field, these advanced heads provide the tools necessary to elevate their game to new heights. Whether you choose the Hero 2.0 or the ECD 2.0, you can be confident that you’re wielding a piece of equipment that represents the cutting edge of lacrosse technology.
Intro – Mesh heads are a game changer
The lacrosse head has come a long way since the traditional wooden stick days. Modern technology has enabled engineers to design heads with intricate pocket patterns and scoops specifically engineered for handling, passing, and shooting. But perhaps the most significant advancement has been the introduction of molded heads with an open sidewall design constructed from durable yet flexible materials like plastic polymers. This shift from traditional wooden lacrosse sticks to synthetic heads was truly a game-changer.
Mesh pockets were soon incorporated into these new plastic heads, replacing traditional leather and gut stringing. Mesh provided more consistent pocket depth, better ball control, and increased ball speed on passes and shots. As these high-tech heads evolved, manufacturers began tweaking head shapes, sidewall configurations, and scoop angles to optimize performance. Terms like “pinched heads,” “hourglass rails,” and “high scoops” entered the lacrosse lexicon. Players could now choose heads based on their personal style and position. The development of synthetic heads and mesh pockets brought unprecedented levels of precision, consistency and power to the modern game.
The ECD Brave and early mesh heads
One of the early pioneers in synthetic lacrosse heads was ECD Lacrosse (formerly Edge Composites Design). Their innovative Brave head debuted in 2006 and quickly gained popularity. With a radical open sidewall design, curved scoop, and pinched round ball stop, the lightweight Brave offered excellent ball control and quick, accurate passing and shooting. As one of the first heads optimized for mesh pockets, it represented a quantum leap past traditional heads. The Brave’s success paved the way for wider adoption of synthetic heads with advanced geometries. ECD would build on the Brave’s template, introducing the Rebel, Rebel O, and Rebel Offense heads in subsequent years.
Hundreds of thousands of players embraced these early ECD heads and their advanced mesh pockets. By opening up the sidewall and engineering the scoop, runners, and throat, ECD allowed players to string deeper pockets for incredible ball control. The heads excelled at quick sticks, feeds, and outside shots. As ECD continued iterating and refining their iconic shapes, competitors took notice. Before long, mesh heads from Maverik, STX, and Warrior offered players even more choices.
The rise of Hero Mesh
Despite the success of ECD and other mesh heads, some limitations remained. Mesh tends to bag out and deform over time, pocket depth and shape are hard to maintain, and sidewall stiffness can vary. Enter Hero Mesh – an evolutionary leap past traditional mesh that aimed to solve these challenges. The developers of Hero Mesh engineered a next-gen woven pocket with structure and feel exceeding traditional mesh. Hero Mesh eliminated mesh distortion and inconsistent shooting, revamping pocket performance. As Hero Mesh improved ball control, feel, and hold, it quickly gained a cult following.
But the real magic happened when Hero Mesh was implemented in a redesigned head. After years of R&D, Hero Lacrosse launched their eponymous Hero 2.0 head in 2021, fully optimized for Hero Mesh. With a stiff open sidewall and strategically placed stringing holes, the Hero 2.0 let players customize the deepest legal pockets possible with unparalleled consistency. Throw in the head’s rounded edges for excellent ball handling and a specially designed scoop for quick releases, and the combination was unstoppable. While ECD’s legacy mesh heads certainly drove innovation, Hero 2.0 was the first head engineered from the ground up for next-gen woven pockets.
ECD answers with the 2.0
Never one to be outdone, ECD Lacrosse responded to the Hero 2.0 by engineering their own ground-up mesh head – the ECD 2.0. Taking cues from their wildly popular Rebel Offense model, ECD built the 2.0 with a similar pinched, hourglass shape. The key innovations came in the sidewalls, runner, and scoop. ECD added extra definition to the sidewalls to optimize flex and improve pocket support. This stiff yet responsive sidewall allows for fine tuning pocket placement and depth. ECD also extended the head’s runner for increased hold and control. And by optimizing the angle, depth, and edges of the scoop, they improved quick releases and ball handling.
Under the hood, ECD revamped their signature rail system by rounding edges and removing unnecessary material. The resulting head is lightweight yet incredibly stiff and strong. With its widened throat and deep pocket enabled by the stiff sidewalls, the ECD 2.0 competes head-to-head with the Hero 2.0. Both heads represent the cutting edge of mesh technology. But which one has the edge?
The faceoff showdown: Hero 2.0 vs ECD 2.0
With ECD and Hero’s latest mesh heads, players now have two elite options engineered specifically for next-gen pockets. The Hero 2.0 and ECD 2.0 take different approaches but share a common goal – maximizing the benefits of woven mesh technology to take performance to the next level.
The Hero 2.0 likely has the edge in ball control and pocket consistency thanks to Hero Mesh and perfectly dialed stringing holes. Its closed sidewall and rounded scoop also excel at quick sticks and feeds. Meanwhile, the ECD 2.0 benefits from over a decade optimizing the pinched head shape to provide excellent feel on passes, catches, and shots. Given ECD’s proven head geometry and upgraded sidewalls, the 2.0 may have slightly better shot speed and accuracy. Ultimately, choosing between the Hero 2.0 and ECD 2.0 comes down to head shape preferences and desired pocket placement.
Both represent the pinnacle of advanced mesh head engineering. With the innovations driving today’s synthetic heads, the development curve continues to accelerate. As ECD, Hero, and others push the envelope,mesh heads inch closer to perfection. While traditional wooden sticks laid lacrosse’s foundation, modern polymer mesh heads have propelled the sport into a new era. Players can only imagine what the next generation mesh head will unveil. But for now, the Hero 2.0 and ECD 2.0 sit atop the throne as kings of the lacrosse jungle.
ECD – The OG mesh innovator
Before discussing the latest and greatest mesh heads from ECD and Hero, it’s worth looking back at how ECD drove many of the key innovations that got us here. When ECD founder Greg Gurenlian first introduced the ECD Brave in 2006, it represented a radical departure from traditional wooden lacrosse sticks. With its lightweight synthetic construction and open sidewall optimized for mesh pockets, the Brave was a revelation.
As the first elite-level head engineered specifically for mesh, the Brave ushered in a new era defined by advanced pocket technology. By pioneering heads with pinched geometries, scoops and runners fine-tuned for handling and ball control, ECD ushered in the age of specialized heads. For the first time, players could pick heads tailored to their position and playing style – be it midfielders, attackmen, or face-off specialists.
ECD continued iterating on the Brave’s template, introducing ever more advanced mesh heads like the Rebel, Rebel O, and Rebel Defense. With each new head, enhancements were made to the sidewalls, runners, scoops, and ball stops to eke out every advantage for ball control, handling, and shooting. Features like hourglass sidewall shapes, elongated ball channels, and strategic stringing holes became ECD’s signature. Competitors like STX, Maverik, and Warrior ultimately followed ECD’s lead.
The success of early ECD mesh heads
But it wasn’t just the heads that drove ECD’s success – it was how they leveraged mesh pocket technology. ECD’s heads were engineered to allow midfield runners, attackers, and face-off specialists to string deep pockets optimized for their respective games. The company’s roots in elite face-offs were apparent in the heads ability to facilitate control through cradling. This combination of ergonomic head shapes and pinpoint pocket tuning gave ECD a proven formula.
By optimizing heads for mesh, ECD propelled pocket technology forward. Features like memory meshes improved shape retention, new sidewall configurations facilitated pocket placement, and shooting string placement was dialed in. ECD’s legacy of mesh innovation laid the foundation for today’s advanced pocket technologies. Their heads proved that optimized head geometry and engineered mesh could unlock a player’s full potential.
Facing the new competition
ECD long dominated the world of mesh heads and pinched sidewall design. But the arrival of upstarts like Hero Lacrosse aimed to challenge ECD’s supremacy. With their Hero 2.0 head specifically engineered for next-gen Hero Mesh, Hero looked poised to disrupt ECD’s dynasty. Hero’s rounded head shape, extra stiff sidewalls, and strategic stringing holes gave their mesh unprecedented performance. With excellent pocket feel and control, the Hero 2.0 won over many fans.
But ECD had no plans to relinquish the mesh throne they created. The release of the ECD 2.0 head showed they still had some tricks up their sleeve. Taking the best aspects of their proven Rebel and Rebel O heads, ECD built the 2.0 from the ground up for modern mesh. Improvements to the sidewall, runner, scoop, and bottom rail showed ECD’s engineering chops. The 2.0 provided the same elite handling and ball control ECD diehards were accustomed to – optimized for next-gen mesh.
The face-off of the mesh giants
So which head reigns supreme in the battle of mesh innovation – the Hero 2.0 or ECD 2.0? With both companies raising the bar, lacrosse players are the real winners. But ECD’s legacy as the creator of specialized mesh heads can’t be overlooked. While the Hero 2.0 represents an impressive and well-crafted newcomer, ECD’s accumulated knowledge and expertise with pinched head engineering makes the 2.0 a force.
That’s not to say Hero hasn’t pushed ECD to keep innovating. The back and forth between the mesh giants will continue to drive advancement. But for now, when choosing between Hero’s rounded shape or ECD’s angular contours, balance and feel favor ECD. The ECD 2.0 exemplifies over 15 years of cutting edge mesh head creation. Hero may someday claim the mesh throne, but ECD’s not ready to relinquish it just yet. The 2.0 is their declaration that original mesh innovation still reigns supreme.
Hero 2.0 – New kid on the block
The rise of Hero Lacrosse took the lacrosse world by storm. Founded in 2013, the upstart company made waves when it introduced an innovative new mesh called, well, Hero Mesh. Woven to provide better shape retention, consistency, and improved handling, Hero Mesh won over devotees with its next-gen feel. But Hero’s biggest impact came when they engineered a head specifically designed for their high-performance mesh.
Debuting in 2021, the Hero 2.0 head represented a bold challenge to the established brands. While giants like ECD, Maverik, and STX had iterated on pinched head designs for years, Hero went a totally new direction. The 2.0 featured a rounded, closed sidewall shape unlike anything else on the market. Hero built the head from scratch to take advantage of Hero Mesh’s capabilities.
Rethinking shape and sidewalls
Hero’s fresh approach to head design was clearest in the 2.0’s sidewalls. Rather than an open shape, the 2.0 utilized a completely closed sidewall. This provided maximum support for keeping the Mesh pocket consistent. The stiff, overmolded sidewalls also allowed tuning pocket placement and depth with surgical precision. Stringing holes were meticulously positioned to enable the deepest legal pockets possible.
The 2.0’s wider, rounded head shape also contrasted with pinched heads. Built for control, the shape provided excellent ball feel for cradling, scooping, and passing. Edge rounding on the sidewalls enhanced handling. Hero engineered the 2.0 for today’s athletic, two-way midfielders. Their radical head shape and sidewalls were a calculated risk that paid off.
Optimized for next-gen mesh
But the Hero 2.0 shape was only part of the equation. The head’s magic truly came from optimizing every aspect for Hero Mesh. The materials and dimensions of the sidewalls, runners, scoop, and throat were dialed in to maximize the performance woven mesh enables. Features like an angled scoop and tapered throat boosted quick releases. Reinforced runners offered unprecedented stability. The Hero 2.0 let players customize pocket placement and depth to unleash the full potential of Hero Mesh.
This synergy of a redesigned head shape and next-gen mesh gave Hero Lacrosse its edge. While ECD evolved their proven pinched head geometry, Hero went back to the drawing board. The result was a midfield masterpiece perfected for control. With excellent feel on cradles, feeds, and shots, the Hero 2.0 appealed to players craving innovation.
The new face of mesh
So does the Hero 2.0’s fresh design and dialed Hero Mesh give it an advantage over ECD’s pedigree? With its closed sidewalls and custom stringing options, Hero clearly raised the mesh bar. The 2.0 is both familiar enough for ECD loyalists yet uniquely optimized for Hero Mesh’s capabilities. While the 2.0 won’t replace the ECD Rebel in diehards’ hearts, Hero’s commitment to engineering a next-gen mesh head is commendable.
For midfield machiners, fogos, and attackmen, the Hero 2.0 is a revelation. Its total reimagination of head design speaks to Hero’s innovative ethos. They refused to follow conventions, instead starting from scratch to build the perfect home for high-performance mesh. The result is a bold new competitor in the mesh arms race. While ECD may still have the edge in heritage, give it time. Hero’s freshman effort shows immense promise to shape lacrosse’s future.
Pocket design – Who did it better?
The pocket design has long been an important yet overlooked element in disc golf bags. With players demanding more storage and accessibility, brands like ECD and Hero have pushed the envelope, setting off a pocket design faceoff that has the disc golf world buzzing. Let’s break down the key innovations and see whether ECD’s latest offering or Hero’s newest release comes out on top in this pocket design showdown.
The Contenders
In one corner, we have the ECD Rebel V5, featuring the company’s brand new Faceoff Mesh pockets. ECD pulled out all the stops on the Rebel V5, completely overhauling the storage with an impressive 16 total pockets. Front and center are the Faceoff Mesh pockets, specially engineered for lightweight durability, ventilation, and easy disc retrieval.
Facing off against the Rebel V5 is the Hero 2.0, the much anticipated refresh of their popular backpack. Hero gained a cult following with their seemingly bottomless storage design, and the 2.0 model aims to improve accessibility with their unique Double Decker pockets. These vertical, overlapping pocket pairs allow for organizing more discs in less space.
First Impressions
Upon first glance, the most striking aspect of the Rebel V5 is the bright, open Faceoff Mesh pockets. Discs can be seen through the mesh material, making it easy to find the disc you need. The vertical zippers open wide for grabbing discs, a major upgrade over previous ECD bags. Meanwhile, the Hero 2.0 pockets maintain the brand’s signature solid materials. There is no shortage of storage space, but visibility and accessibility is lower compared to the ECD mesh pockets.
Storage Capacity
Both brands clearly prioritized maximizing storage, but their philosophies differed. The Rebel V5 takes a straightforward approach, with each pocket designed to hold as many discs as possible. With 6 main mesh pockets, additional side pockets, and the try-it pocket, there’s room for 25+ discs. Storage is simple and intuitive.
The Hero 2.0 takes a more innovative road. By stacking pockets vertically, they fit discs tightly together, optimizing every inch. The 14 Double Decker pockets boast capacity for 30+ discs in about the same overall space as the ECD bag. However, the overlapping pocket design requires more digging to access discs.
Durability
When it comes to standing up to daily use and abuse, the solid pocket materials of the Hero 2.0 seem built to last. The Double Decker design keeps pocket sides protected, preventing tears and holes. Though ECD claims their Faceoff Mesh is rugged, the lightweight open material likely won’t hold up as well long-term.
Both bags use high denier nylon for the main shell material and YKK zippers known for reliability. The ECD bag features extra reinforcement on high-wear points like pocket tops. For straps and back padding, both use thick, comfortable closed cell foam.
Comfort
Comfort is a major priority for players lugging 20+ discs around for hours. The Hero 2.0 uses a basic adjustable two-strap design with a modest lumbar pad. Padding thickness is average and the simple strap configuration provides an okay carrying experience.
ECD put more thought into comfort on the Rebel V5. The adjustable ECD-Flex straps contour closely across the chest, dispersing weight evenly. An adjustable sternum strap and extra-thick, padded back panel and lumbar pad prevent digging. Small touches like zipper garages also boost comfort.
The Verdict
While both brands pushed pocket design forward in their own way, ECD gets the nod for taking a bigger leap with their Faceoff Mesh. The transformative mesh material sets a new standard for visibility, ventilation, and accessibility. Storage capacity is ample and comfort is dialed. Hero’s Double Decker pockets excel at maximizing space, but pocket accessibility and comfort fall slightly short of the Rebel V5.
For their bold innovation with the Faceoff Mesh pockets, ECD is the winner in this pocket design showdown. But with brands constantly raising the bar on bag design, we can expect even more impressive pockets in the future.
Sidewall stiffness – A tale of two technologies
When it comes to disc golf disc sidewalls, stiffness is crucial for performance. But how companies achieve sidewall stiffness varies greatly. Innova’s patented Wingtech and Discraft’s advanced Flextec represent two unique approaches to stiffening sidewalls. Let’s dive into the technologies behind these leading brands and see how they stack up.
The Need for Stiffness
Before examining the technologies, it helps to understand why stiff sidewalls matter. When throwing a disc, the rim is the first point of contact with the air. Keeping the rim stable and resistant to folding is critical for achieving ideal lift and glide properties. A soft, flexible sidewall causes the rim to distort, degrading flight consistency and accuracy.
Stiffer sidewalls also transfer force more efficiently from the central disc to the rim as it rotates. This helps optimize angular momentum for longer throws with less effort. Simply put, stiff walls mean better flights.
Innova’s Wingtech – Plastic Precision
For decades, Innova championed sidewall stiffness through disc molding refinements. But with Wingtech, introduced in 2015, they took a quantum leap forward. The key lies in the proprietary plastic blend used for the wing sidewalls.
By tuning the formulation at the molecular level, Innova produces a stiffer, stronger plastic matrix. When flowed into the disc mold’s sidewall sections, it bakes into an incredibly rigid barrier. Surrounding sections utilize softer blends, creating firm but gradual stiffness transitions.
The end result is a clean, sleek sidewall that resists deformation better than any previous design. And by isolating the firm plastic to the essential areas, weight is minimized.
Discraft’s Flextec – Composite Construction
Unlike Innova’s materials-focused approach, Discraft achieves stiff sidewalls through an innovative construction technique. Introduced in 2019, Flextec leverages the combined strength of multiple layered components.
The process starts with a base structural layer made of impact-resistant polymer. This provides general rigidity, but flexes more than desired. Next, a carbon fiber membrane is laid, adding exceptional stiffness with negligible weight.
The final outer layer encapsulates the carbon fiber, providing seamless edge integration. The result is a lightweight, multi-functional composite sidewall showcasing the strengths of each material.
The Verdict
Both Wingtech and Flextec deliver on the promise of stiff, consistent sidewalls. But Innova’s optimized plastic blends produce inherently stiffer walls without added weight. The smooth transition between sections also helps discs feel and fly more naturally.
Discraft’s layered Flextec design works well, but the noticeable carbon seam and abrupt section transitions are slight drawbacks. For leveraging the latest plastic technology to create the stiffest, lightest sidewalls, Wingtech earns the win.
Advancements like these show that in the quest for disc golf perfection, sidewalls are no longer an afterthought. And with smarter designs and materials, the sky’s the limit for dialing in stiffness.
Weather proofing – Is 2.0 an improvement?
Playing disc golf in the rain, snow, or heat is tough on gear. Manufacturers aim to create bags that withstand the elements while keeping discs dry. As Hero updates to the 2.0, does their weatherproofing stack up to the competition? Let’s compare Hero’s latest tech against top brands and see if version 2.0 is up to the challenge.
Weak Points of Past Designs
Disc golf bags see a lot of wear and tear. Zippers, fabric, and seams take the brunt of exposure to sun, rain, mud, and more. If not properly treated, these areas fail quickly.
Early Hero bags were notorious for lacking weatherproof features. Zippers corroded and leaked, fabrics soaked through, and seams split. Discs and belongings got soaked, especially in sustained wet conditions. It was clear an upgrade was needed.
Hero 2.0 WeatherTech
With the 2.0 model, Hero introduced their patented WeatherTech system. It focuses weatherproofing efforts in the most vulnerable areas.
First, a PU coating on the main fabric provides enhanced water resistance compared to the standard polyester previously used. Seams are now taped rather than just stitched, preventing moisture seepage into stitches.
Finally, weatherproof TIZIP zippers replace the old corroding sliders. These hold up better when grit, mud, and moisture work their way into the teeth. Hero also added a rainfly for complete coverage during severe weather.
How Others Approach Weatherproofing
Hero’s updates close the weatherproofing gap with competitors somewhat, but top brands go even further. For example, Upper Park utilizes fully waterproof 420D TPU laminated fabric. Not just a coating, the TPU membrane makes the base material impermeable.
Grip also extrude-coats their primary zippers to seal out moisture. Meanwhile, Pound pre-treats threads with a liquid silicone coating before sewing to prevent wicking. These brands demonstrate next-level weatherproof technology.
Does the 2.0 Deliver?
The upgrades in Hero’s 2.0 model, especially the TIZIP water-resistant zippers, do improve weather resistance. However, the bag still falls short of the best on the market.
Reliance on polyester fabric coatings rather than laminated membranes leaves the bags vulnerable in extreme wet. Fully weatherproof zippers on every compartment would provide complete confidence. There is still work ahead for Hero.
While a step forward, Hero’s WeatherTech does not quite achieve the level of weatherproofing found in the most advanced bags. For all-condition reliability, choose a brand utilizing the latest fabric and zipper technology.
Shooting performance – Big shots or bust
The faceoff between ECD and Hero 2.0 mesh lacrosse heads is heating up. With new technology and innovations, lacrosse heads are becoming more specialized for specific positions and playing styles. For attackmen and midfielders looking to improve their shooting performance, the choice between ECD’s 2.0 and Hero’s 2.0 mesh lacrosse heads could come down to which delivers more pop and precision on shots.
ECD touts their 2.0 as optimized for shooting performance with an elongated scoop and pinched sidewall design. This shaping is intended to flex the mesh pocket in a way that increases hold and whip on shots. ECD has also incorporated more offset into the sidewall, lowering the lowest shooting string and bringing the pocket closer to the scoop. This aims to center the ball in the optimal shooting spot on every shot. Reviews from players indicate the ECD 2.0 mesh does provide excellent hold while increasing velocity and accuracy, especially on low-to-high shots and quick sticks. The pinched scoop allows for cleaner ball handling as well. The downside is that some report the ECD 2.0 sacrifices some feel and control compared to a more traditional head shape.
Hero approaches shooting performance from a different angle with their 2.0 mesh head. Instead of elongation and pinch, Hero maximizes offset and uses a curved sidewall to cup the ball. This cradling effect is designed to center the ball automatically while providing tons of whip. Hero has also reinforced the scoop and widened the throat of the head for increased durability and improved ball handling. Players love the way the Hero 2.0 pops off releasing top-hand shooters and cannons from up top. The flexible Hero mesh and smooth release point mean you can feed the cage confidently without losing feel. The trade-off is that some players believe the Hero 2.0 lacks versatility for dodging and passing compared to a more rounded head shape.
So when it comes to shooting performance, is one head clearly better than the other? The answer likely comes down to your specific shooting mechanics and tendencies. For players who struggle with consistency shooting low-to-high or on the run, the ECD 2.0’s elongated scoop and pinched sidewalls offer the centered ball position and added whip you need to hit your spots. The flexible mesh also provides great hold on quicker stick shots. Just be aware that you may sacrifice some feel in exchange for the increased velocity and responsiveness.
For players who love shooting top-hand bombs from up top or want the ultimate in release and follow-through, the Hero 2.0 delivers the cradling effect you need to center the ball automatically with tons of offset-generated whip. The reinforced scoop is great for handling tough feeds as well. Just recognize that the Hero may not be as versatile for dodging and feeding compared to other heads. Consider stringing it more loosely to increase feel if you want to increase control.
Both the ECD and Hero 2.0 mesh lacrosse heads have optimized their designs to improve shooting performance. While their approaches differ, both achieve the goal of increased velocity, accuracy, and responsiveness on shots. For players struggling with consistency or lacking whip, the ECD 2.0 provides excellent centered hold and snap. For shooters who love shooting high bombs or want the ultimate in ball-centering pocket whip, the Hero 2.0 offers exceptional power and feel. By matching your preferred shooting mechanics and style with the head design, you can gain that shooting edge to start sniping corners and hitting top cheddar.
When it comes to must-make goals in crunch time, every shooter wants the confidence that comes from a lacrosse head optimized for shooting excellence. Both the ECD and Hero 2.0 mesh lacrosse heads deliver in their own way. Focus on your personal shooting tendencies and mechanics to decide which head gives you the best chance at hitting your spots when it matters most. With the improvements in head design and mesh technology, today’s lacrosse heads offer shooters the specialized performance to come through as a big shot when it counts. Choose wisely based on your style, train hard to master your mechanics, and then let it rip! The joy of a perfect shot hitting nylon is well worth the preparation and practice.
Scooping – Ground balls galore
When the ball hits the turf, the battle is on. Securing ground balls and scooping up those crucial loose balls can make or break a lacrosse game. As faceoff specialists, defensemen, and fogos know, a lacrosse head’s scooping ability can give you that extra edge in ground ball battles. In the showdown between the ECD 2.0 and Hero 2.0 lacrosse heads, scooping performance may help determine which mesh head reigns supreme.
ECD designed their 2.0 mesh head to improve ball handling and scooping efficiency. The elongated pinch and flex point near the throat is intended to give added control when corralling ground balls. ECD also reinforced the bottom rail and tapered the head’s profile to make picking the ball off the turf easier. In addition, the pinched scoop shape helps guide ground balls directly into the pocket. For faceoff specialists, the ECD 2.0’s optimized scooping features allow them to gain possession off the clamp and rake with more authority. Defensemen also appreciate how the narrowed head and flexible mesh helps them secure ground balls quickly when battling opponents.
Hero also prioritized ground ball performance when designing their 2.0 head. They focused on widening the throat area to give players more control scooping up ground balls. Hero also optimized the flex profile to allow the head to envelop ground balls, rather than bouncing out. The reinforced scoop is designed to withstand slashes and improve ball handling. For players who struggle scooping up ground balls consistently, the Hero 2.0 gives them an advantage off the draw, on the ride, and in scrambled situations. The widened throat and stiff scoop allows them to get under ground balls and maintain possession through contact.
While both companies designed their heads to improve ball handling and possession, which truly gives you an edge in ground ball battles? The verdict likely comes down to playing style and individual technique. Faceoff specialists may prefer the ECD 2.0 for its pinched scoop that expertly channels balls into the pocket. The flexible mesh also makes it easier to clamp down on a ground ball off the draw. Defensive-minded players might appreciate the ECD for how the tapered head shape and reinforced rails secure balls quickly when being pressured.
For athletes who want maximum ground ball control and struggle with scooping consistency, the Hero 2.0 provides the widened throat and stiff scoop needed to improve possession. The Hero excels at getting under ground balls and maintaining control through contact due to the enveloping flex pocket. Players who rely more on fundamentals than finesse can boost their ground ball prowess with the Hero.
While most lacrosse heads aim to provide well-rounded performance, specialized heads like the ECD and Hero excel in specific facets of the game. For players obsessed with gaining that extra possession to spark transition or win a ground ball battle, optimizing their lacrosse head for supreme scooping ability is a wise choice.
Consider your personal style and needs in a head when choosing between the ECD and Hero 2.0. Faceoff specialists may find their lightning-quick hands pair perfectly with the ECD’s pinched scoop and narrow channel. For takeaway artists who want every ground ball to be theirs, the ECD delivers. Defensive-minded beasts who scrap and fight for every loose ball need a head like the Hero that can withstand abuse. The Hero’s ideal for box lacrosse and the rough-and-tumble nature of club ball.
While debates will continue over which head reigns supreme, one thing is certain – the advancement in head design and mesh technology gives players more specialized options to gain an edge. For athletes obsessed with ground ball prowess, choose the head optimized for scooping excellence that pairs with your personal style. Then get to work honing those ground ball fundamentals. Rip around on some turf, taking rep after rep to make scooping second nature. Become a ground ball machine and let your stick do the rest. With the right head and right work ethic, those 50/50 balls might start looking more like 80/20 coming your way.
Face shape – An angle on diamonds
Lacrosse heads come in a variety of face shapes, from traditional rounded diamonds to specialized pinched and elongated profiles. For offensive players looking to gain an edge, the face shape showdown between the ECD 2.0 and Hero 2.0 presents an interesting choice.
ECD engineered the 2.0 head for optimized shot speed by elongating the scoop area and pinching the sidewalls. This allows for deeper pocket placement and extra whip on shots. However, some players feel these shaping tweaks sacrifice versatility and precision. The narrow channel and flexible sidewalls make tight dodges more difficult. Passing lanes seem tighter too. While great for shooting, some midfielders may find the ECD 2.0 lacks the well-rounded feel of a classic diamond.
Hero aims for the best of both worlds with the 2.0 by starting with a traditional diamond face shape. They maximize offset for increased hold and potency on shots, but keep the sidewalls rounded for playmaking versatility. This provides the ball-centering benefits of a specialized head without overly compressing the channel or sacrificing feel. While not as pinpoint on shooting as the ECD, the Hero 2.0 offers a balanced approach for dodgers, feeders, and shooters alike.
So which philosophy wins out when it comes to face shape? The verdict depends on your desired balance between specialization and flexibility. For midfielders who live to rip top-shelf cannons from way outside or struggle with low-to-high sniping, the ECD 2.0’s elongated pinched scoop offers the focused ball-centering and pocket placement needed to gain shooting confidence.
However, don’t expect the ECD to provide much finesse on quick-stick feeds or tight dodges. You sacrifice some feel and control in exchange for optimized shooting performance. For players who take a more balanced approach, moving between dodging, feeding, and shooting, the Hero 2.0 provides an excellent middle ground. The traditional diamond maximizes versatility, while offset and sidewall contours amp shooting performance compared to a typical head.
It’s all about priorities when choosing your face shape for optimal performance. Think about your primary role on the field. Are you a shooter first and foremost, looking for every advantage bombing the ball top-shelf? Then the ECD 2.0 delivers with its specialized shooting shape. But if you want one head to do it all – capable on shots but also smooth on feeds and dodges – go with the Hero 2.0. Its diamond shape paired with offset provides the best blend of shooting potency and all-around playmaking ability.
There are always trade-offs when manufacturers make subtle tweaks to a lacrosse head’s face shape. As the game evolves and players become more specialized in their roles, we’ll likely see more experimentation with how face profiles impact overall performance. While a universal approach can benefit developing players, optimized shapes can give elite players at their position an extra weapon.
For youth players still honing their complete game, stick with a well-rounded diamond shape to build confidence in all facets – shooting, dodging, and feeding. But for experienced high school, college, and pro players who know their strengths, think about how an elongated or pinched head could provide that extra punch shooting. Or if you’re a feeder first, ensure a smooth release and ball control with a classic diamond optimized for playmaking versatility. Consider your specialization and needs, then let your head’s shape complement your skills and role.
Durability – Can it take a beating?
With slash-happy defensemen and ruthless ground ball battles, a lacrosse head takes a beating every game. A head’s durability helps determine its lifespan and performance over time. In the matchup between the ECD and Hero 2.0 mesh heads, durability is a key factor separating these specialized heads.
ECD focused first on optimizing the 2.0’s performance, resulting in design choices that impact overall durability. The lightweight composite material and elongated shape make the ECD 2.0 more vulnerable to checks, errant slashes, and collisions. Faceoff specialists report the ECD 2.0 loses its shape and rebound quicker than other heads. Additionally, the pinch and flexible sidewalls are more prone to warping. While great for ball handling and shooting out of the box, the ECD 2.0 seems to lack the ruggedness needed for heavy use.
In contrast, Hero designed the 2.0 with durability at the forefront. It incorporates a high-grade polymer and reinforced sidewalls to maintain shape and stiffness. Enlarging the throat area provided more material to withstand hacks and slashes too. Players laud the Hero 2.0 for maintaining its crispness and responsiveness even after months of play. Its solid construction makes it ideal for faceoff specialists, defensemen, and fogos who punish their heads.
When it comes to deciding between these specialized heads, durability is likely more crucial for certain positions and playing styles. Faceoff players and grind-it-out midfielders will appreciate the Hero 2.0’s ruggedness and ability to maintain its shape despite abuse. The ECD 2.0 better suits finesse players who prioritize responsiveness and shooting performance out of the box. Unless protected by officials, the ECD 2.0’s delicate features may degrade quicker.
That being said, every player wants a head built to stand the test of time. As materials and designs advance, we’re seeing more heads like the Hero 2.0 that balance optimized performance with battle-ready toughness. This bodes well for players who used to sacrifice responsiveness and feel for hardcore durability. Now through thoughtful engineering, you can find heads that check all boxes.
While crosse aesthetics and style provide the sizzle, durability gives you the substance needed for a lengthy relationship. Think about your playing style and position needs when choosing between specialized heads like the ECD and Hero 2.0 mesh. Prioritize durability if you play between the lines and take hacks every possession. But for pure offensive weapons who shy from contact, optimized feel and ball control out of the box may warrant compromising ruggedness. By matching your game, desired features, and playing time estimates with head construction, you can maximize performance all season long.
As lacrosse stick technology advances, durability and optimized function need not be mutually exclusive. Heads like the Hero 2.0 prove you can deliver both through thoughtful engineering. This evolution helps all players, from resilient battlers to skillful finesse artists, play their best. While debates continue over SuperMesh supremacy, one thing is clear – today’s heads let every athlete play hard and fast all season long.
Value – Bang for your buck
When it comes to lacrosse head technology, the competition is fierce. Two of the biggest names in the game, ECD and Hero, have been battling it out for years to produce the most high-performance and innovative gear. With the release of the new ECD 2.0 and Hero 2.0 heads, the stakes have been raised once again. But which head really gives players more bang for their buck?
On one side, you’ve got the tried and true ECD 2.0. Building off the success of the original ECD, this updated head features an asymmetrical sidewall design that’s intended to add extra whip on shots while maintaining stiffness. It’s got a narrowed throat and scoop for improved ball control, paired with ECD’s “inverted” face shape that flexes on shots then snaps back for added velocity. Reviews of the 2.0 praise its responsiveness and hold, making it a favorite for offensive players looking to ramp up their shooting power. Its price tag falls right around the $100 mark.
Hero has responded with their new Hero 2.0 head, featuring proprietary “Suspension Tech” sidewalls. These are designed to “suspend” the ball in the pocket for superior control and quicker release on passes and shots. The Hero 2.0 has a minimal offset for accuracy, along with an end-to-end taper on the sidewalls for extra stability up top. At around $80, it’s priced a bit lower than the ECD. Players say it has a smooth, consistent release and nice overall balance.
So when you dig into the details, which head really gives lacrosse athletes more value for their money? There’s a case to be made for both.
Starting with the ECD 2.0, the biggest advantage is the focus on maximizing shot speed and power. For offensive players who rely on their shooting ability, this extra punch can be a game-changer and well worth the extra $20. The head shapes and sidewall design back up these performance claims with tech engineered to add whip and velocity. The overall construction quality is also solid. Considering the ECD name has become synonymous with nasty rips, the 2.0 builds on that reputation.
However, the Hero 2.0 brings some intriguing new tech of its own at a more budget-friendly price point. That Suspension Tech sidewall and minimal offset aim to give players better control and passing/shooting accuracy – critical skills for both offensive and defensive players. And the reviews indicate Hero succeeded in achieving the smooth, consistent releases they were going for. So for players who want premium tech but without breaking the bank, the Hero 2.0 is a compelling option.
There are a few key factors that might tip the scales one way or the other:
- Position – Attackmen may lean towards the ECD for shooters while D-middies might appreciate the Hero for quick stick checks and outlet passes.
- Shooting style – Players with a more simple, low-to-high shot that relies on accuracy could like the Hero while those with a more complex wind-up and sidearm delivery may prefer the ECD’s added whip.
- Budget – The $20+ price difference, while not huge, could be the deciding factor for some players.
At the end of the day, it’s hard to declare one strictly “better” than the other. The ECD 2.0 brings that pedigree of elite shooting performance and commands a slight premium for it. But the Hero 2.0 counters with impressive new tech at a more attractive price point for value-focused athletes. For most players, it will likely come down to individual shooting style, position, and budget when deciding if the ECD’s power or the Hero’s control suits their game better.
But one thing is clear – with these two innovative heads battling things out, there’s no shortage of performance and value for lacrosse players shopping for a new whip this season. The win may come down to personal preference, but with tech and competition driving innovation like this, athletes are the real winners when companies push to one-up each other. And that intense rivalry is something we can all celebrate, no matter which head you strap on for game day.
Weight – Light as a feather
One of the eternal debates in lacrosse equipment is finding the ideal balance between durability and lightweight feel. Heads that are too bulky can slow you down, while an ultra-light whip can dent and deform easily. With their newest face-off heads, ECD and Hero took different approaches to addressing this challenge.
The ECD 2.0 relies on a alloy sidewall and signature carbon fiber supports to keep the weight down without sacrificing stiffness. Several vents and cutouts provide additional reductions. Coming in at 5 ounces strung, ECD optimized the 2.0 for light and snappy releases on face-offs and shots. Players praise how smooth it feels overall, giving confidence that it can stand up to abuse during intense draw battles.
Hero engineered the 2.0 with a focus on strategically removing any non-essential weight while retaining strength. By analyzing stress points during face-offs, they trimmed unnecessary mass from low-load areas. The Suspension Tech sidewalls also let them shave weight by reducing the need for additional supports. At 4.5 ounces strung, the Hero 2.0 fulfills the goal of feather-light speed.
When comparing the specs head-to-head, the Hero 2.0 has a noticeable half ounce advantage. But a few other factors come into play when evaluating true in-game performance.
That carbon and alloy construction makes the ECD rigid and ready for impact out of the box. Some players report the Hero 2.0 starts off a bit flexy until it’s broken in. So while lighter initially, it may need some time to reach full durability. The ECD provides that stiffness right away.
With its minimal offset and sidewall design focused on control, the Hero aims for quick, effortless releases during groundballs and draws. Yet that ultra-light feel could work against it when absorbing checks. The ECD balances low weight with the strength to withstand clashes.
Comfort and feel are subjective, but the ECD provides a bit more “reassuring” of a presence in your hands. The Hero lives up to its feathery-light billing, which works great for quick moves but may feel too insubstantial for some.
In the end, the scale reads in Hero’s favor by a hair, but ECD’s robust carbon puts up a fight. For FOGOs who obsess over every ounce, the featherweight Hero may have the edge. Yet ECD’s blend of low weight with battle-ready toughness can also appeal for facing off. So while the Hero is technically lighter on paper, the overall in-game feel is closer based on construction quality. Both deliver exceptional lightness, just with different philosophies.
The verdict? Each head takes a commendable approach to optimizing weight for facing off:
- The ECD 2.0 strikes a precise balance between optimized lightweight feel and robust protection for collisions.
- The Hero 2.0 pushes the limits of featherweight construction without sacrificing durability over time.
For FOGOs who play a more physical, grind-it-out style, the ECD 2.0’s blend of light feel and hardcore toughness is hard to beat. Those looking for ultra-quick release moves will appreciate the Hero 2.0’s incredibly minimal weight. Either way, these heads prove cutting-edge tech can produce incredibly lightweight performance that still stands up to hardcore face-off battles. The future looks bright — and light — for innovators to continue challenging the limits of what’s possible.
Looks – Judge a book by its cover
Let’s face it, looks matter – even when it comes to lacrosse heads. Along with high performance, players want an eye-catching design to intimidate opponents and give them style points on the field. ECD and Hero know this, putting effort into crafting distinctive visuals for their latest heads.
The ECD 2.0 features a sleek, futuristic style with angular cutouts and vents that match its techy construction. The asymmetrical sidewall slopes aggressively from one side to the other for a bold, unorthodox look. Customizable color options let players choose their preferred scheme. ECD also offers glow-in-the-dark prints for max visual impact under the lights.
Hero took a more minimalist route with the 2.0, focusing on clean lines and precision design. The head has a symmetrical profile and integrated sidewall with subtle contours. A matte textured finish gives it an understated, high-end feel. Players can select accent colors to make it pop. It’s a more refined, low-key aesthetic versus ECD’s eye-grabbing angles.
Both deliver visual flair while reflecting the overall performance identities – ECD aggressive and Heroesubtle. But which actually looks better on the field?
The ECD 2.0 makes a bold statement as soon as you step on the turf. It practically screams power and attitude from the sidelines. The glow prints are undeniably sick for night games. And if you want to intimidate your matchup, few heads will do it better. There’s no subtlety though – it’s designed to garner attention.
Alternatively, the Hero 2.0 is clean without seeming boring. The silhouette flows nicely from every angle. It’s more comparable to a sleek sports car versus a snarling monster truck. The matte texture is a classy touch. Hero basically nailed a premium yet understated lacrosse aesthetic.
Coming down to personal style, players who want loud, bold graphics and vibes will love repping the ECD 2.0. The Hero 2.0 will appeal to athletes looking for a refined, bespoke sports car look.
A few other visual factors to consider:
- Color options – ECD offers full customization, glow and other prints, while Hero has more limited accent choices.
- Stringing setup – ECD’s steep sidewalls suit intricate stringing, but cleaner pocket styles better match the Hero’s minimalist look.
- Field position – Goalies and defenders may dig ECD’s flashy intimidation factor more than low-key midfielders.
Regardless of whether you think the books’ covers are as game-changing as what’s inside, these heads make big aesthetic statements that align with their performance attributes. ECD basically made a head that looks like an energy drink can exploded on it, while Hero went for subdued yet premium refinement.
Both approaches have their merits, letting players choose the right visual identity for their style and attitude on the field. And just like with tech specs, having this diversity of looks and feels benefits athletes in the end. It pushes brands to experiment with aesthetics along with functionality. So while your priorities may vary between looks and performance, these innovative companies recognize the importance of both when crafting the complete product.
We can’t definitively rule which head looks the coolest for everyone. But having these two eye-catching yet very different options raises the game when it comes to head style and design. And for giving us more to appreciate both on and off the field, we say cheers to that.
The final faceoff – And the winner is…
After breaking down the specs, performance, and intangibles of the ECD 2.0 and Hero 2.0 heads, it all comes down to this – declaring a winner. But the truth is, with technology and innovation driving competition, lacrosse athletes are the real victors.
Both ECD and Hero engineered face-off masterpieces, each with specific strengths catering to different players and positions. The ECD 2.0 takes the prize for pure shooting performance. Its asymmetric sidewall and carbon construction give it the punch today’s power shooters demand. Meanwhile, the Hero 2.0 impresses with its featherweight feel and control for quick-twitch groundball moves. At $20 less, it also secures the value title.
Yet firmly declaring one superior across the board feels impossible with so many factors in play. Shooting style, stiffnesss preferences, desired aesthetics, stringing setups, and playing level can all tip the scales one way or the other.
For NCAA d-middies, the ECD’s extra whip and durability for wicked shots gains appeal. High school FOGOs on a budget will appreciate the Hero’s bargain price and crisp handling. So rather than a definitive GOAT, it’s a matter of finding the right match for your game.
In the end, ECD and Hero both succeeded – the 2.0 heads achieved their dedicated face-off design goals while pushing tech and performance limits.
What we can say for sure is this face-off battle has fueled innovation that benefits every player, regardless of brand loyalty. The competitive drive to outdo each other gave us these groundbreaking heads that raise the bar across the board.
So while picking an individual winner may prove impossible, we can all agree that this intense rivalry produced two stellar options for face-off athletes. Having such a diversity of premium choices lets players select the head that’s just right for them.
The final verdict: Thanks to the master craftsmanship and dedication to excellence from both brands, lacrosse players are the real champions. These companies continue to prove how engineering advancements can meaningfully enhance athletic performance when developed smartly. Both the ECD 2.0 and Hero 2.0 deliver everything we could hope for in a modern face-off head. And that intense drive to out-innovate each other will no doubt bring us even more game-changing tech breakthroughs long into the future.
For now, we say kudos to ECD and Hero for this battle royale that gave us such field-tested works of art. Let their quest to one-up each other rage on – we can’t wait to reap the benefits.
The future – What’s next for mesh?
With the ECD 2.0 and Hero 2.0 setting new standards for face-off head performance, where does mesh technology go from here? If these latest innovations are any indicator, the future looks insanely bright.
Expect companies to push material science even further in pursuit of the perfect blend of stiffness, durability, and lightweight feel. We’ll see new composites and alloys that optimize strength right down to the molecular level. Head shapes could become even more specialized for particular face-off moves. The possibilities are wide open.
For example, R&D labs are likely already experimenting with graphene and nanomaterials to enhance structural integrity beyond the limits of conventional metals. New scanning and modeling tech will let them simulate stresses and strains on heads to tweak designs with scientific precision. The goal will be maximizing stiffness in high-load zones while removing any excess material that adds weight.
Heads could also incorporate smart features like sensors to collect data on face-off performance. Imagine heads that give real-time feedback on moves, or use AI to provide training tips based on your technique and mechanics. The goal would be optimizing your face-off game with insights no human coach could gather.
Companies might even explore custom-fit designs based on a player’s exact head dimensions and preferences. Imaging technology could map your head’s contours, then engineers construct a one-of-a-kind head molded specifically for you. We’re approaching an era of personalized lacrosse gear tuned just for your body.
Innovations in mesh shooting strings and sidewall patterns will further enhance control, release, and ball feel. Expect shooting accuracy gains down to the millimeter. Companies could even experiment with programmable “smart mesh” that actively changes shape or tension during play. The possibilities get crazy.
Materials will get cooler visually too – maybe glow-in-the-dark nano-ceramics or color-shifting polymers that dazzle under lights. Performance attributes will still dominate engineering, but aesthetic flair will complement the tech.
Most importantly, all these advances aim to give players an unfair competitive edge. When companies one-up each other with the latest tech, we reap the benefits. It becomes a virtual arms race to outfit athletes with the best innovations imaginable.
So while the ECD 2.0 and Hero 2.0 represent the pinnacle for now, they’re really just a hint of what’s to come. The future of mesh heads will take performance and customization to levels we can only imagine. And driven by the competitive quest to out-engineer each other, brands will stop at nothing to deliver the impossible – again and again.
Strap in and get amped, because mesh head technology is still just getting warmed up. The game we know today will seem prehistoric in 10 years. But for lacrosse lovers, that relentless pace of innovation is what makes the ride exciting. The future is so mesh we can taste it.