How did Salisbury University’s men’s lacrosse team perform in 2019. What were their key achievements and notable games. How did they fare against rival teams and in postseason play.
Salisbury’s Stellar 2019 Season: A Year of Triumphs
The Salisbury University men’s lacrosse team had an exceptional 2019 season, showcasing their prowess on the field and solidifying their reputation as a powerhouse in Division III lacrosse. The Sea Gulls, as they are affectionately known, demonstrated remarkable skill, teamwork, and determination throughout the year.
Their impressive performance was evident in their overall record and their dominance in key matchups. The team’s success was not just limited to regular season play; they also made a significant impact in postseason tournaments, further cementing their status as one of the top lacrosse programs in the country.
Season Highlights and Key Statistics
- Overall record: 22-1
- Conference record: 8-0 in the Capital Athletic Conference (CAC)
- Home record: 12-0
- Away record: 10-1
- Goals scored: 384
- Goals allowed: 138
- Average margin of victory: 10.9 goals
These statistics paint a picture of a team that was not only successful but also dominant in their performances throughout the season. The Sea Gulls’ ability to maintain such a high level of play consistently is a testament to their skill, preparation, and coaching.
Breaking Down Salisbury’s Offensive Firepower
Salisbury’s offense in 2019 was nothing short of spectacular. The team’s ability to score consistently and in high volumes was a key factor in their success. On average, the Sea Gulls scored 16.7 goals per game, overwhelming their opponents with their offensive prowess.
Top Scorers and Offensive Contributors
- Cross Ferrara – 62 goals, 27 assists
- Josh Melton – 35 goals, 53 assists
- Pierre Armstrong – 48 goals, 22 assists
- Corey Gwin – 46 goals, 23 assists
- Zach Pompea – 36 goals, 25 assists
The balanced scoring attack of Salisbury made them a formidable opponent. Their ability to distribute the ball effectively and create scoring opportunities from multiple players made their offense difficult to defend against.
Defensive Dominance: The Backbone of Salisbury’s Success
While Salisbury’s offense garnered much attention, their defense was equally impressive. The team’s defensive unit played a crucial role in their success, consistently shutting down opposing offenses and providing a solid foundation for their victories.
Key Defensive Statistics
- Goals allowed per game: 6.0
- Saves percentage: 58.2%
- Caused turnovers: 267
- Ground balls: 723
The Sea Gulls’ ability to limit their opponents’ scoring opportunities while creating turnovers and maintaining possession was a significant factor in their dominance throughout the season.
Salisbury’s Path to the NCAA Championship
Salisbury’s impressive regular season performance earned them a spot in the NCAA Division III Men’s Lacrosse Championship. The team’s journey through the tournament was marked by several notable victories and demonstrated their ability to perform under pressure.
NCAA Tournament Results
- Second Round: Salisbury 18, Stockton 3
- Third Round: Salisbury 18, Denison 10
- Quarterfinals: Salisbury 12, Dickinson 11
- Semifinals: Salisbury 12, Tufts 11
- Championship: Salisbury 13, Cabrini 18
Despite falling short in the championship game, Salisbury’s run to the final showcased their resilience and skill against top-tier competition. Their ability to win close games in the quarterfinals and semifinals highlighted the team’s mental toughness and clutch performances.
Individual Accolades and Honors
The success of Salisbury’s 2019 season was reflected in the numerous individual awards and recognitions received by players and coaches. These honors not only celebrated individual achievements but also underscored the overall strength of the program.
Notable Awards
- Jim Berkman – CAC Coach of the Year
- Brad Apgar – CAC Defensive Player of the Year
- Brett Malamphy – CAC Player of the Year
- Cross Ferrara – USILA First Team All-American
- Josh Melton – USILA Second Team All-American
These accolades reflect the depth of talent within the Salisbury program and the respect garnered from peers and observers of Division III lacrosse.
The Impact of Salisbury’s 2019 Season on Program Legacy
Salisbury’s exceptional 2019 season added another impressive chapter to the program’s storied history. The Sea Gulls have long been recognized as one of the premier Division III lacrosse programs, and their performance in 2019 further solidified this reputation.
Historical Context
- NCAA Division III National Championships: 12 (prior to 2019)
- NCAA Tournament appearances: 31 consecutive years (as of 2019)
- Conference championships: 21 straight (as of 2019)
The 2019 season continued Salisbury’s tradition of excellence, maintaining their streak of NCAA Tournament appearances and conference dominance. While they fell short of adding another national championship, their overall performance throughout the season and deep tournament run demonstrated that they remain a force to be reckoned with in Division III lacrosse.
Looking Ahead: Building on 2019’s Success
The success of the 2019 season set a high bar for future Salisbury lacrosse teams. The challenge for the program moving forward would be to maintain this level of excellence while adapting to the inevitable changes in personnel and competition.
Key Factors for Continued Success
- Recruiting top talent to replace graduating players
- Continuing to develop and refine offensive and defensive strategies
- Maintaining the team’s strong culture and work ethic
- Adapting to changes in the competitive landscape of Division III lacrosse
With the foundation laid by the 2019 team and the program’s long-standing tradition of success, Salisbury lacrosse was well-positioned to continue its reign as one of the top Division III programs in the country.
The Broader Impact of Salisbury’s 2019 Season on Division III Lacrosse
Salisbury’s dominant performance in 2019 had ripple effects throughout the Division III lacrosse landscape. Their success set a benchmark for other programs to aspire to and influenced the competitive balance of the division.
Influence on Other Programs
Many Division III lacrosse programs looked to Salisbury as a model of sustained excellence. The Sea Gulls’ ability to consistently perform at a high level year after year inspired other teams to elevate their own standards and practices. This led to an overall increase in the quality of play across Division III lacrosse, as teams sought to close the gap with powerhouse programs like Salisbury.
Recruiting Implications
Salisbury’s success also had a significant impact on recruiting. Top high school lacrosse players aspiring to play at the collegiate level took notice of Salisbury’s achievements, making the program an attractive destination for talented athletes. This created a positive feedback loop, where success led to better recruiting classes, which in turn contributed to continued on-field success.
Tactical Innovations
The team’s offensive and defensive strategies were closely studied by coaches and analysts throughout Division III. Salisbury’s ability to adapt their tactics to different opponents and game situations provided valuable lessons for other programs looking to improve their own strategic approaches.
As we reflect on Salisbury’s remarkable 2019 season, it’s clear that their impact extended far beyond their win-loss record. The team’s performance set new standards of excellence, influenced the competitive landscape, and contributed to the overall growth and development of Division III lacrosse. Their legacy serves as an inspiration and a challenge to future generations of lacrosse players and programs striving for greatness.
Stockton Downed by #1 Salisbury in NCAA Second Round
Baseball
Baseball: Schedule
Baseball: Roster
Baseball: News
Basketball
Basketball: Schedule
Basketball: Roster
Basketball: News
Cross Country
Cross Country: Schedule
Cross Country: Roster
Cross Country: News
Lacrosse
Lacrosse: Schedule
Lacrosse: Roster
Lacrosse: News
Soccer
Soccer: Schedule
Soccer: Roster
Soccer: News
Track & Field (Ind/Out)
Track & Field (Ind/Out): Schedule
Track & Field (Ind/Out): Roster
Track & Field (Ind/Out): News
Basketball
Basketball: Schedule
Basketball: Roster
Basketball: News
Cross Country
Cross Country: Schedule
Cross Country: Roster
Cross Country: News
Field Hockey
Field Hockey: Schedule
Field Hockey: Roster
Field Hockey: News
Golf
Golf: Schedule
Golf: Roster
Golf: News
Lacrosse
Lacrosse: Schedule
Lacrosse: Roster
Lacrosse: News
Rowing
Rowing: Schedule
Rowing: Roster
Rowing: News
Softball
Softball: Schedule
Softball: Roster
Softball: News
Soccer
Soccer: Schedule
Soccer: Roster
Soccer: News
Tennis
Tennis: Schedule
Tennis: Roster
Tennis: News
Track & Field (Ind/Out)
Track & Field (Ind/Out): Schedule
Track & Field (Ind/Out): Roster
Track & Field (Ind/Out): News
Volleyball
Volleyball: Schedule
Volleyball: Roster
Volleyball: News
Academics/Compliance
Athletic Training
Coaches Forms
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
Facilities
Fitness/Strength & Conditioning
Hall of Fame
Intramurals
Postseason History
Recruitment Video
SAAC
Sports Camps/Clinics
Staff Directory
Student Employment
Title IX
Virtual Campus Visit
Vision, Mission & Values
Visitors/Tickets
50th Anniversary
Bowling
Cheerleading
Esports
Fencing
Fishing
Ice Hockey
Jiu Jitsu
Judo
Men’s Golf
Men’s Rowing
Men’s Volleyball
Quadball
Scuba
Table Tennis
Tennis
Ultimate Frisbee
Unified Sports
Weight Training
SUNY Geneseo Men’s Lacrosse History vs Salisbury University
Men’s Lacrosse History vs Salisbury University from Mar 23, 2019 -
Mar 16, 2022
Last Matchup
Mar.
16,2022
7
at
18
Full Box Score
Recap
Losses
2
Streak
L2
Longest Win Streak
0 Games
N/A
Longest Losing Streak
2
Games
3/23/2019 – 3/16/2022
Home Record
0-0
Away Record
0-2
Conference Record
0-0
First Matchup
L 3-18
3/23/2019
Last 2 Matchups
0-2
3/23/2019-3/16/2022
Largest Margin of Victory
N/A
N/A
Smallest Margin of Victory
N/A
N/A
Total Goals
10
Average Goals
5
| Date | Season | Location | Score | Media |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
March 16, 2022 3/16/2022 |
2022 |
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2019 3/23/2019 |
2019 |
|
|
|
Win
Loss
90,000 Ontario league-leading, possible draft surprise and risk-taking quarterback.
How Belarusians are assessed by independent scouts
NHL Draft
Event
September 15, 2020
Shortly before the NHL Draft, we studied the materials of authoritative sites – McKeen’s Hockey, HockeyProspect.com and Future Considerations.
The dates for the NHL Draft have finally become known – it will take place on October 6-7. This year, we do not expect a record number of Belarusians to be selected at the fair of young hockey players, but some names regularly appeared in various ratings.
These lists were prepared out of habit for the summer. Therefore, the most popular teams of their compilers have long released electronic publications, which describe the impressions of specialists from what they saw. We found references to our young hockey players in published reports and translated them for you.
Products from the following sites have been used: McKeen’s Hockey, HockeyProspect.com, Future Considerations. Their staff includes dozens of amateur scouts (or independent scouts) around the world. At the same time, many of them are in contact with employees of NHL clubs, often exchange information and, of course, attend the same matches.
The approach of the authors of Hockey Prospect is interesting this year. Although they re-released an analysis of the game of several hundred young hockey players, they included only 109 in the final ranking.field players, based on the experience of NHL clubs, whose pre-draft pre-draft roster averages between 85 and 120 players.
They also “reward” hockey players with marks from 3 to 9 in five main parameters: “hockey intelligence”, “competitiveness”, “skill”, “skating”, “physical data”. They also give a specific assessment of the position in the draft: “A” (round 1), “B” (2-3 rounds), “C” (4-7 rounds), “C +” (closer to round 4 than to 7- mu), ND (proposed not to be drafted).
In the rest of the ratings, everything is classic, there will be no such features.
This is how our talents are seen by those who try to pay attention not only to the scoreboard when watching matches. It should be noted that almost all the mentioned hockey players currently play for Belarusian clubs.
Evgeny Oksentyuk (2001, Flint, Ontario League, now – Youth )
Future Considerations, 81 out of 300
The fast winger has improved his skating, although he could still work on his pure speed. However, Evgeny knows when to turn on the acceleration in order to beat the defenders. He doesn’t quite generate power [when skating] as he should, but he has a solid footing and covers the puck well for a player of his size.
Oksentyuk sees the court well, often gives accurate passes to players who join and recognizes the opportunity for escalation in the attacking zone.
He has both the skills to control the puck and the creativity to execute any pass in front of the net. There is nothing special in Evgeny’s shot, but the puck leaves the stick with lightning speed at the moment of execution of this element, and good accuracy is inherent in him.
An assertive player who loves to get under his opponent’s skin, Evgeny is not averse to muddying the waters and doesn’t mind playing the role of annoyance.
His defensive play is still under development. He is a good forechecker and seems to be ready to put in the effort in the offensive zone. Oksentyuk works tirelessly in the neutral zone, trying to stop the creation of an opponent with an active stick. Problems arise when the puck is in the defensive zone. He seems to be turning off somewhat, attacking the defender on the blue line without much enthusiasm. Eugene is often ready to block the shots of other defense players, but it seems that his efforts are limited to this.
Also, the authors of this publication noted Oksentyuk in a special section, where they singled out the best for individual playing qualities.
In order not to have Lafrenier or Rossi everywhere, each hockey player could only be used once. This paved the way for the Belarusian to the title of the player with the best puck control in the Ontario league, according to both scouts.
McKeen’ s Hockey, 98 of 217:
The diminutive Belarusian striker has to be considered one of the best sophomores available this year after a very strong first season in North America with the Flint Firebirds. At 5 feet 8 inches (173 cm), he may be small, but he is fast and fearless. This helped him adapt to the Ontario league, where Evgeny became the top scorer of the firebirds that took off in the table. Oksentyuk is a puck-wielding magician who constantly makes defenders make mistakes as he picks up the pace and rushes to the net in the center. He is a playmaker and a sniper in one bottle, has a very well thought out attacking game. The question is whether scouts think his skills will be as effective at the NHL level as he won’t be a bottom six player.
HockeyProspect. com, 92 out of 109:
Grades: hockey intelligence – 7, competitiveness – 7, skill – 7, skating – 5, physical data – 4. Draft category – C (4-7 rounds).
He is a short winger, but plays in a dynamic attacking style and is never out of action. Eugene’s dimensions do not prevent him from winning physical combats with rivals. Oksentyuk is a strong and fearless player who is second to none when it comes to winning the puck or standing up for himself or his teammates.
Along with the fact that Evgeny has a strong competitive spirit, he has a great talent in attacking actions. Oksentyuk is a cunning playmaker who is very creative and can dominate the offensive zone.
This is the player that the puck seems to “stick” to when the game is in the opponent’s net. Oksentyuk sees the court perfectly, and can perform many high-class passes, after which his teammates just have to send the puck into the net. He’s a very smart offensive player and knows what he wants to do with the puck before it’s in his stick.
This season, Evgeny scored 33 goals, but at the same time in many matches he had problems with getting on target and finishing. He was Flint’s top scorer and occasionally showed quality scoring ability, but with the number of chances he created for himself, Evgeny should have scored a lot more. Oksentyuk quickly executes a wrist shot and the puck after it flies with great speed, but he has problems with accuracy.
According to our rating scale, his skating is a maximum of five with a ponytail, and this is a potential problem, given the size of Evgeniy. He lacks pure breakaway speed and his stride is a bit clumsy.
In terms of skating, he is left with a chance for sharpness, agility and stability on skates while defending the puck. Oksentyuk may not be able to beat defenders with speed alone, but he can bring the puck from his own net to others and make controlled entrances to the zone, thanks to the ability to break the pace and change direction.
Evgeny is very dangerous in counter-attacks with a numerical advantage and forces opponents to capitulate by finding open teammates with passes, thereby creating high-quality scoring chances. Given how much time Oksentyuk spends with the puck on the hook, he can get carried away trying to create beauty and make a loss. When this happens, as a rule, he is the first to rush to work on defense, thanks to a powerful internal “engine” and intransigence. Extremely competitive, plays with great passion and energy. Also very dangerous in most. Operates right half aboard and is very good at moving the puck, creating chances and shooting.
He is reliable in his zone, despite his small size, thanks to a competent choice of position and diligence.
He does not avoid contact and goes to the end in episodes, he is ready to play diligently at his gate in martial arts. You can rely on him at the end of the game while holding the advantage of one puck. Eugene knows how to piss off his opponents, and prevents them from showing their game.
In general, Oksentyuk is a dynamic versatile hockey player, whose shortcomings are in size and skating. And the main question remains whether he can eliminate some of the problems in skating.
One of the most enjoyable players in the Ontario league to watch is an NHL scout, October 2019.
“He’s not draft material, but he’s a great OHL player,” NHL scout, October 2019.
“I think he would be good for the later rounds, but I would pick him. A good hockey player who can play through hard work is an NHL scout, November 2019.
– The first time I saw him was in Guelph, and then he really impressed me. In all the following viewings, he was also great.
I like the way he puts out a lot and plays fast. Flaws in skating are what make him difficult to judge given his short stature – HockeyProspect.com scout, Mark Edwards, March 2020.
Danila Palivko (2001, Lethbridge, Western Hockey League, now – Neman )
Future Considerations, number 180 (from 300):
Teams looking for a malleable defensive player may be interested in Palivko. A large player who moves relatively efficiently on the ice is good at attacking, but could improve power on the return. Danila’s acceleration in skating is nothing special, but the choice of trajectory and the power of his step help him elude his rivals as soon as he picks up speed.
There aren’t many defenders with that size and long arms that use them well. The ability to control the puck while moving from side to side and thereby maximize their advantage in arm length; his vision of the site; how he interacts with teammates behind his goal line; the ability to shorten the distance with an opponent with a stick and then move into power combat – these are all his pluses.
He has some basic puck control qualities and skills, although he could be a little more creative at times and cling to the puck harder. Palivko chooses the position well and can give a sensible long pass. In martial arts in front of the gate, he is able to keep up with the opponent and stay in front of him. Although Danila is a hockey player who can be beaten on the move, there are few things in his game that can lead to him being caught off guard or losing position.
Offensively, Palivko is a clear passer who quickly executes short passes that often reach the goal. He usually doesn’t use his roll too much and looks like he’s avoiding opportunities to attack more often.
Overall, Palivko is smart, efficient, and makes good use of his body, playing a strong style when he needs to.
HockeyProspect.
com (not rated):
Grades: hockey intelligence – 4, competitiveness – 6, skill – 4, skating – 3, physical data – 8. Draft category – ND (will not be selected).
Palivko fills the role of a defensive specialist, gets time on the ice in the top 4, and constantly goes out in the minority. He demonstrated the ability to conduct a contact fight at the gate and brought to the end the power moves. Good at the boards and at the junior level was able to push back many rivals. However, not so good in selection. His skating is well below average, he makes wide turns. Puck control is another problem, it is extremely unstable in this component. Danila is generally capable of simple elements, but anything more difficult becomes risky.
Danila’s size is ideal for a defender, but he has a long way to go before he gets close to the NHL. The date of birth at the end of 2001 is also rather in the negative, since he will have a maximum of two seasons to reach the level at which he could become successful in professional hockey..jpg)
Ilya Usov (2001, Prince Albert, Western Hockey League, now – Dynamo Minsk )
HockeyProspect. com (103 out of 109):
Grades: hockey intelligence – 6, competitiveness – 6, skill – 6, skating – 6, physical data – 7. Draft category – C (4-7 rounds).
Usov is a strong and skilled forward from the Prince Albert Raiders. Ilya got into the WHL on an unusual route. He has spent the last two seasons at Salisbury without much progress in scoring. Despite representing Belarus in international tournaments in the last two seasons, Ilya was able to sign with Prince Albert as a “local” and made his WHL debut this season.
Ilya exceeded all expectations, scoring close to one point per game, and hit the radar in his second year of NHL draft availability. Thanks to his good size, he has the makings of a power winger. If he becomes more powerful and continues to work on this aspect, then this can become his role.
Skating Ilya has its pros and cons. Mobility and first steps are below average, but his speed and ability to defend at full speed are closer to the best. He has a good throw, which Ilya quickly executes. He has shown flashes of playmaking ability, but so far he is still more of a sniper than a passer. His defensive play is hit or miss, but Ilya seems to have put a lot of effort into improving that component last season. Thanks to this, he was rewarded with a game in the second minority brigade.
Ilya must become stronger and continue to develop. But he has some intriguing qualities that should grab the attention of NHL teams and give him the opportunity to have his name heard as a second-year pick in the 2020 NHL Entry Draft.
– Played very well this season with Ozzy Weisblatt – NHL scout, May 2020.
Future Considerations, 282 of 300:
After the first 200 players, the creators decided not to describe the exploits.
Yes, and there will be only 217 picks in the draft. But there is a mention – at least something.
Valentin Demchenko (2002, Be Comeau, Quebec League)
HockeyProspect. com (not rated):
Grades: hockey intelligence – 5, competitiveness – 6, skill – 6, skating – 5, physical data – 5. Category in the draft – ND (will not be selected).
Demchenko came to Be Comeau after being drafted 44th overall by the Drakkar in the CHL Import Draft. The Belarusian winger has had a tough first half of the season in the Quebec league but has bounced back from the Christmas break with 25 points in his last 30 games.
Demchenko secured a place in the top 6 and often played alongside other imports, Raivis Kristans Ansons, and overager Gabriel Proulx on the second line of the Be Como.
The Belarusian winger loves to control the puck and create chances. It has decent pace and good maneuverability, but it lacks the high gearing needed to create clear ice zones. Valentine must improve his explosive speed in order to succeed in the future.
He is capable of beating 1-on-1 players at the Quebec league level thanks to the speed, agility and short accelerations he uses to go around opposing defenders. He has a good and technical throw, but he lacks strength.
At the moment, he is a one-sided hockey player; he lacks the full range of play that his linemate Ansons has, who is also a potential 2020 draft pick. Also, Demchenko is not distinguished by success in the power struggle. However, he has fast hands, can be dangerous in one-on-one situations, and is capable of throwing good passes. Valentin has impressed in an even line-up as he has scored 26 out of 34 points this season in a 5-on-5 game. His skill level is in order; in our opinion, judging by the second half of the season, Demchenko will be a good player for the Quebec league, but we do not see the proper skills or hockey intelligence that would help him play in the NHL.
Future Considerations, 269 of 300:
A similar situation as with Usov.
McKeen’ s Hockey: not listed, but mentioned in the rating of “sleepers” – those who may shoot later, but are not yet so noticeable.
Benoit Belanger notes the following qualities of Valentine:
I had several players in mind for the sleeper selection in the later rounds. However, the one he settled on became more desirable due to his origin: Belarus. The Quebec league doesn’t feature players from that country that often.
Demchenko has excellent puck control skills, which is probably his strongest attribute.
Repeatedly demonstrated soft hands when dealing with the goalkeeper alone or performing superbly accurate passes. His throw, snap or wrist, is excellent: he is unpredictable and accurate.
As for skating, I like his mobility and the way he uses the ribs of the skate. Not the most physically developed hockey player, but he has a fairly good balance, which allows him to stand firmly. He has a good hockey intelligence and understanding of the game, but I would like Demchenko to improve his passing game. Not because he is a bad dispatcher, the questions are more about assessing the situation on the ice.
Of course, he has yet to “grow up” in the game. He also needs to gain weight, add power. If he manages to get tougher and Demchenko starts to play more in the body, then I remain convinced that he is one of those players who will show good progress in the junior leagues. I noticed that Valentin understands what shortcomings need to be corrected and how to work on these aspects.
I wouldn’t hesitate to pick him in the final rounds of the draft.
Ilya Solovyov (2000, Saginaw, Ontario League, now – Dynamo Minsk )
HockeyProspect. com (not rated):
Grades: hockey intelligence – 4, competitiveness – 5, skill – 5, skating – 4, physical data – 7. Category in the draft – ND (will not be selected).
Aggressive attacking defenseman Ilya Solovyov had a productive debut season in the Ontario League with Saginaw Spirit. In terms of scoring, Solovyov seemed to play two different seasons. After a hot start to the championship, the 6-foot-2 blueliner stalled in the second half, scoring just 12 points in his last 26 games.
The “imported” defender has a certain skill, but he does not move perfectly on the ice. He has a super aggressive play style. He is a risky machine for “closing” the attack zone; when it works, he can prolong the advance, great.
But he makes many mistakes that are simply inexplicable.
Solovyov very often played as if he were the fourth striker. Sometimes he started pressing in someone else’s zone, trying to intercept a bunch of long passes at the opponent’s goal and in the center of the court. Sometimes he flew at all to someone else’s goal, and then forgot to return to his own when the direction of the game suddenly changed.
Solovyov does not avoid power struggle. His skating stride is a bit short and rather unproductive. After a few steps he can gain a decent top speed, but skating is the least interesting part of his game as it doesn’t really hurt him, but doesn’t help him either. Solovyov has a strong shot and he does it well on the move.
After all, performance does not reflect his level of skill. He is by no means mediocre, but he is also not super dynamic with the puck. He’s a good passer, but there’s nothing amazing about that aspect of the game either.
Solovyov’s aggressive style has worked in the junior league as he has conceded relatively few goals this season, but Ilya has played quite differently from the pros. He has poor on-ice judgment and hockey intelligence, making it difficult for him to progress in the future. For us, the size and strengths of Ilya do not outweigh all the shortcomings in his hockey.
McKeen’ s
A big defender with good offensive control, but his role has diminished since Bode Wild returned.
Vitaliy Pinchuk (2002, Kingston, Ontario League, now – Metallurg )
McKeen’ s
Although Pinchuk’s season did not differ globally from Demchenko’s performances, he received almost no mentions in these ratings.
It is worth mentioning here the attention of specific scouts of these resources, who could devote more time to the Quebec league, especially when it comes to candidates for the lower rounds, which is reminiscent of a guessing game.
In McKeen’ s Hockey, a pupil of Zhlobin hockey was awarded one phrase:
The forward, who has progressed over the season, looks comfortable in the puck and has the potential to grow.
Oksentyuk lacrosse, Alistrov’s art and other best Belarusian goals in the CHL in the 2019/20 season
Six Belarusians who were hit the hardest by the CHL season cancellation
Text: Konstantin Korablev
Photo: flintfirebirds.
com
Bryanston School – apply, prices 2023, reviews
Location:
BryANSTON, County Dorset (Dorset)
Programs:
GCSE, A LEVEL, IB Diploma
Age:
13-18 Years
Accommodation:
School, No residence
Number of children:
680
Education:
Shared
Description
Bryanston School (Bryanston School) – an independent private school for girls and boys aged 13 – 18 years. The school offers a boarding house and daytime education. In total, about 681 students study here. The school is located in the village of Bryanston (Bryanston) near the town of Blandford Forum, about 2.5 hours drive from London, and occupies 400 acres of the most beautiful land in the county of Dorset (Dorset).
Bryanston School was founded in 1928 by a young, creative Australian teacher, J.G. Jeffreys, who used his confidence and enthusiasm to secure support and funding for the school during a difficult economic time.
Today, the school sets an example to much older independent schools of striving for academic and extracurricular excellence. Bryanston School is unconventional, forward-looking and open to new ideas. The school takes pride in the quality of education, the methods used to encourage and achieve goals. If the level of a school can be determined in any way, then only through the achievements of its graduates. They develop themselves and follow paths that interest and motivate them, know what it takes to succeed and have enough practical skills to realize their potential.
At Bryanston School offers a wide range of training programs, many students excel in sports. Some compete at the regional, national and international level. Sport plays an important role at Bryanston School and success is achieved at the highest level. Pupils usually play several sports, at least three times a week. In addition to physical development, team sports develop confidence in themselves and their comrades, the ability to work in a team, and leadership qualities./cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/60064773/OFBYKEUBAEDSNKE.20180221185054.0.jpg)
The goal of Bryanston School is to prepare well-rounded 18-year-old graduates who are ready to go out into the world to lead happy and fulfilling lives and contribute to society.
In order to appreciate the scale of this school, you should definitely visit here. To make a final decision, I strongly recommend talking with experts. The school, unfortunately, prohibits the publication of a video of my visit to the school, if you are interested, please contact me individually.
Bryanston School is regularly inspected by the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the last inspection was carried out in 2019. According to the results of the audit, the school meets all the standards that are put forward for schools in terms of organizing the educational process, school management, quality of education and ensuring the proper level of education, health, and education of students.
The independent publication “The Good Schools Guide” said about the school: “Great school, better equipped than most similar schools./cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/65128339/Bernhardt020919-09.0.0.jpeg)
Here, each student has the opportunity to realize himself in learning, arts and sports. Too good for such a young school? Maybe. The school is actually more traditional than it might seem at first glance.”
The school accepts children of all religions and beliefs. The official religion at the school is Anglicanism .
School address. Bryanston School
website
The British school system is divided into parts, pre-preparatory (Pre-prep School), preparatory (Prep School), secondary (Secondary School) and Sixth Form. Different schools offer one, several or all levels. School departments may be located in the same or different premises, respectively, the school may have one or more addresses.
The school is located in the village of Bryanston (Bryanston) near the town of Blenford Forum (Blandford Forum), Dorset County (Dorset).
Full Address School
Bryanston School
Blandford Forum
Dorset
DT11 0PX
900 04
Extracurricular activities.
Sports Bryanston School
In Bryanston School there are a huge number of sections and interest clubs. Here is an example of some of them that occur on a regular basis:
- athletics
- badminton
- basketball
- riding
- vocals
- rowing
- diving
- drama club
- painting
- equestrian
- cricket
- lacrosse
- athletics
- hobby music
- netball
- sailing
- swimming
- rugby
- rhetoric
- climbing
- squash
- archery
- dancing
- theater arts
- tennis
- fencing
- picture
- football
- hockey
- chess
- and more
School facilities Bryanston School
Bryanston School equipped to the highest modern standards and has modern infrastructure:
- running tracks
- drama theater
- riding stables
- squash courts
- gyms
- tennis courts
- gym
- fitness room,
- heated indoor pool
- photos club
- and more
Accommodation Bryanston School
The school has 12 separate houses for boys and girls, divided by age of the children.
- Buka (Younger boys)
- Cranborne (Junior Boys)
- Connaught (Older Boys)
- Dorset (Older Boys)
- Greenleaves (Girls)
- Harthan (Girls)
- Hunter (Girls)
- Portman (Older Boys)
- Purbeck (Girls)
- Salisbury (Older Boys)
- Shaftesbury (Older Boys)
Each hostel accommodates 55 people. Younger students live in rooms for 3-4 people, students of 10-11 years of study live in rooms for 1-2 people, and students of the last year of study live in rooms exclusively for one.
Enrollment. Required documents Bryanston School
To apply to the school, the following documents must be submitted:
- School report card for the last 2 years
- Detailed description from the class teacher
- Letter from a child “Why do I want to study at your school”
- Copies of diplomas, awards, certificates
and pass:
- Interview
- English Entrance Test
- Entrance examination in mathematics or other subjects
Admission rules for foreigners are quite flexible, so please contact the school or our company for a free consultation.
Academic results Bryanston School
A-level
% A* | % A | % B | % C | % D | % E | %A*ABC | % Pass | ||
A-Level 2019 | 15.90 | 32. | 26.10 | 15.70 | 6.60 | 2.90 | 90.4 | 100 | |
A-Level 2018 | 19.00 | 35.20 | 27.00 | 12.10 | 5.30 | 1.10 | 93.4 | 99.8 | |
A-Level 2017 | 18. | 29.90 | 28.90 | 13.60 | 7.50 | 1.90 | 90.5 | 100 | |
A-Level 2016 | 12.70 | 36.60 | 28.50 | 17.60 | 3.60 | 1.00 | 95.4 | 100 | |
A-Level 2015 | 11. | 40.06 | 28.10 | 12.70 | 4.30 | 1.70 | 92.8 | 98.8 | |
A-Level 2014 | – | 46.70 | 28.70 | 18.10 | 4.80 | 1.40 | 93.5 | 99. |
70IB
| 7% | 6% | 5% | 4% | 3% | 2% | 1% |
IB 2019 | 23.6 | 25.0 | 36. | 11.1 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
1
GCSE
% A* | % A | % B | % C | % D | % E | % A*ABC | % A* A | |
GCSE 2019 | 23.5 | 29.7 | 26.5 | 14. | 4.8 | 0.8 | 94.3 | 53.2 |
GCSE 2018 | 25.3 | 31.9 | 26.4 | 13.4 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 97 | 57.2 |
GCSE 2017 | 23.2 | 33.1 | 30 | 12.4 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 98. | 56.4 |
GCSE 2016 | 24.7 | 35.8 | 27.7 | 10.7 | 1 | 0.2 | 98.8 | 60.5 |
GCSE 2015 | 21 | 29 | 35 | 13 | 1 | 0.2 | 98.5 | 50 |
GCSE 2014 | 18. | 34.5 | 30.5 | 14.2 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 97.9 | 53.3 |
8
8Tuition fees Bryanston School
* – Prices for different programs vary. For clarification, contact the manager.
Programs and subjects
GCSE
- English Language
- English Literature
- Biology
- Geography
- Greek
- Computer Science and Communication Technology (ICT)
- History
- Art
- Spanish
- Latin
- Mathematics
- Music (Music)
- German
- Religious Studies
- Drama
- Design & Technology
- Physics (Physics)
- Physical Education
- French
- Chemistry
- Economics
A Level
- English Literature
- English Language
- Business Studies
- Biology
- Further Mathematics
- Geography
- Greek
- Computer Science and Communication Technology (ICT)
- Art
- Spanish
- History
- Art History
- Classical Civilization
- Latin
- Mathematics
- Music (Music)
- German
- Government and Politics
- Japanese
- Religious Studies
- Theater Studies
- Design & Technology
- Physics (Physics)
- Physical Education
- French
- Chemistry
- Economics
IB
- English Language
- Biology
- Spanish
- History
- Cinematography(Film)
- Latin
- Mathematics
- Music (Music)
- German
- Psychology
- Philosophy
- Physics (Physics)
- French
- Chemistry
- Economics
! Some subjects are introduced into the program only if a certain number of students are recruited.
