What are the key features of the Maverik OPTIK 3 lacrosse head. How does it enhance accuracy and control for attackmen. Why is it preferred by professional players like Jordan Wolf.
Unveiling the Maverik OPTIK 3 Lacrosse Head
The Maverik OPTIK 3 lacrosse head stands out as a cutting-edge piece of equipment designed specifically for elite attackmen. This innovative head has quickly gained popularity among players seeking to elevate their offensive game. But what makes the OPTIK 3 so special?
Key Features of the OPTIK 3
- Ground Control technology
- Shortened throat design
- Enhanced accuracy and control
- Optimized for elite attackmen
These features work in harmony to create a head that excels in offensive play, giving attackmen the tools they need to dominate on the field.
Ground Control Technology: A Game-Changer
Ground Control technology is a standout feature of the OPTIK 3. This innovative design element significantly improves a player’s ability to scoop ground balls and maintain possession. How does it work?
- Optimized scoop angle for easier ball pickup
- Improved ball retention during ground ball battles
- Enhanced overall control in fast-paced situations
By incorporating Ground Control technology, Maverik has addressed one of the most critical aspects of offensive play – maintaining possession and initiating attacks from ground ball situations.
The Shortened Throat: Precision Redefined
Another key innovation in the OPTIK 3 is its shortened throat design. This seemingly small change has a significant impact on a player’s performance. How does the shortened throat benefit attackmen?
- Improved accuracy on shots and passes
- Better feel and control of the ball
- Quicker release on shots
- Enhanced maneuverability in tight spaces
The shortened throat brings the ball closer to the player’s hands, allowing for more precise control and faster execution of offensive moves.
Professional Endorsement: Jordan Wolf’s Choice
When a lacrosse head is endorsed by one of the game’s elite players, it’s worth taking notice. Jordan Wolf, a standout attackman for Team USA and widely regarded as one of the best dodging attackmen of his generation, has chosen the OPTIK 3 as his go-to head. Why does a player of Wolf’s caliber prefer this head?
- Exceptional control during dodges
- Precision in shooting and passing
- Versatility for various offensive moves
- Durability to withstand professional-level play
Wolf’s endorsement speaks volumes about the OPTIK 3’s performance at the highest levels of the sport.
Enhancing Offensive Capabilities
The OPTIK 3 is specifically designed to enhance an attackman’s offensive capabilities. How does it achieve this?
- Improved ball retention during dodges
- Enhanced accuracy for both inside and outside shots
- Better control for quick stick moves and passes
- Optimized weight distribution for faster shots
These enhancements allow attackmen to execute complex offensive maneuvers with greater confidence and success.
Customization and Stringing Options
While the OPTIK 3 comes unstrung, its design offers excellent versatility for customization. How can players optimize their OPTIK 3 head?
- Compatible with various mesh types
- Multiple stringing holes for personalized pocket placement
- Ability to create high, mid, or low pockets
- Suitable for both traditional and mesh stringing styles
This flexibility allows players to tailor their OPTIK 3 to their specific playing style and preferences.
Durability and Long-Term Performance
Investing in a high-quality lacrosse head means considering its durability and long-term performance. How does the OPTIK 3 stack up in this regard?
- Constructed with high-grade materials
- Designed to withstand impact and stress
- Maintains shape and stiffness over time
- Suitable for both practice and competitive play
The OPTIK 3’s durability ensures that players can rely on its performance throughout multiple seasons of intense play.
Comparing the OPTIK 3 to Previous Models
The OPTIK 3 builds upon the success of its predecessors in the Maverik lineup. How does it compare to earlier models?
- Improved scoop design for better ground ball control
- Enhanced face shape for more consistent release
- Optimized weight distribution for better balance
- Refined sidewall design for improved stiffness and durability
These improvements make the OPTIK 3 a significant upgrade for players familiar with previous Maverik heads.
Performance in Various Weather Conditions
Lacrosse is played in a variety of weather conditions, and equipment performance can vary accordingly. How does the OPTIK 3 perform in different environments?
- Maintains stiffness in hot conditions
- Resists warping in extreme temperatures
- Performs consistently in wet conditions
- Durable enough for cold weather play
This consistency across various weather conditions makes the OPTIK 3 a reliable choice for players in different climates and seasons.
Price Point and Value Proposition
When considering a high-end lacrosse head like the OPTIK 3, it’s important to evaluate its price point and overall value. How does the OPTIK 3 justify its cost?
- Premium features justify the higher price point
- Long-term durability offers good value over time
- Performance benefits can lead to improved play
- Comparable pricing to other top-tier lacrosse heads
While the OPTIK 3 may represent a significant investment, its performance and durability make it a worthwhile choice for serious players.
Availability and Purchasing Options
For players interested in acquiring the OPTIK 3, understanding its availability and purchasing options is crucial. Where can players find this head?
- Available at specialty lacrosse retailers
- Can be purchased through online sports equipment stores
- Often stocked by college and high school team suppliers
- May be available for demo at lacrosse camps and clinics
Players should check with their local lacrosse retailers or reputable online stores to find the best deals on the OPTIK 3.
User Reviews and Player Feedback
While professional endorsements are valuable, feedback from everyday players provides crucial insights into the OPTIK 3’s performance. What are players saying about this head?
- Many praise its improved accuracy and control
- Players note the effectiveness of the Ground Control technology
- Positive feedback on its durability and consistent performance
- Some mention an adjustment period due to the unique feel of the shortened throat
Overall, user reviews tend to be positive, with many players appreciating the OPTIK 3’s enhanced performance features.
Potential Drawbacks to Consider
While the OPTIK 3 offers numerous benefits, it’s important to consider potential drawbacks as well. What are some factors players should keep in mind?
- Higher price point may be a barrier for some players
- Specialized design may not suit all playing styles
- Some players may need time to adjust to the unique feel
- Unstrung head requires additional time and potential cost for stringing
Players should weigh these factors against the potential benefits when considering the OPTIK 3 for their game.
Maintenance and Care Tips
To ensure optimal performance and longevity of the OPTIK 3, proper maintenance is essential. How can players best care for their OPTIK 3 head?
- Regularly check and tighten screws
- Clean the head after each use to remove dirt and debris
- Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight
- Avoid leaving in hot cars or other high-temperature environments
- Periodically check the stringing for wear and adjust as needed
By following these maintenance tips, players can ensure their OPTIK 3 remains in top condition for multiple seasons.
Compatibility with Shafts and Other Equipment
The OPTIK 3’s performance can be influenced by its compatibility with other equipment. What should players know about pairing this head with shafts and other gear?
- Compatible with standard lacrosse shafts
- Works well with both lightweight and traditional shaft materials
- Can be optimized with specific mesh types for desired pocket feel
- May require adjustment of shooting strings based on individual preference
Players should experiment with different shaft and stringing combinations to find the optimal setup for their OPTIK 3.
The Future of Lacrosse Head Design
The OPTIK 3 represents a significant step forward in lacrosse head design. How might it influence future developments in the sport?
- May inspire further innovations in ground ball control technology
- Could lead to more position-specific head designs
- Might encourage more focus on optimizing ball control and release
- Could spark advancements in materials used for lacrosse heads
As players and manufacturers continue to push the boundaries of equipment performance, innovations like those found in the OPTIK 3 are likely to shape the future of lacrosse gear.
Adapting Your Game to the OPTIK 3
For players transitioning to the OPTIK 3 from other heads, some adaptation may be necessary. How can players best adjust their game to maximize the benefits of this head?
- Practice ground ball pickups to leverage the Ground Control technology
- Experiment with different shooting techniques to find optimal release points
- Adjust dodging moves to take advantage of the improved ball control
- Work on quick stick moves to utilize the enhanced accuracy
By focusing on these areas, players can fully harness the potential of the OPTIK 3 and elevate their offensive game.
Conclusion: Is the OPTIK 3 Right for You?
The Maverik OPTIK 3 lacrosse head offers a range of advanced features designed to enhance the performance of elite attackmen. Its Ground Control technology, shortened throat, and overall design contribute to improved accuracy, control, and offensive capabilities. Endorsed by professional players like Jordan Wolf, the OPTIK 3 has proven its worth at the highest levels of the sport.
However, the decision to invest in this head should be based on individual needs, playing style, and budget. While it offers significant benefits, players should consider factors such as price, adjustment period, and compatibility with their current equipment.
Ultimately, for serious attackmen looking to take their offensive game to the next level, the OPTIK 3 presents a compelling option. Its innovative features, durability, and performance enhancements make it a valuable tool for players committed to excelling in offensive play.
As with any piece of sports equipment, personal preference plays a crucial role. Players interested in the OPTIK 3 should, if possible, test the head or seek feedback from teammates or coaches who have experience with it. By carefully considering its features, benefits, and potential drawbacks, players can make an informed decision about whether the Maverik OPTIK 3 is the right choice to elevate their lacrosse game.
Maverik Optik 3.0 Head for sale
Maverik Optik 3.0 Head for sale | New and Used on SidelineSwap
Lacrosse/Heads/Maverik/Maverik Optik 3.0 Head
From: $50.00 – $89.00
Save this searchAdds to Favorites and notifies you of new items
RecommendedNewestLast UpdatedTrendingPrice: High to LowPrice: Low to High
51 Results
Optik 3.0
Maverik
jakelaxgodd02
Used Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$68
Retail price:
$120
BeardedDutchman
Strung Maverik Optik 3.0
$65
kyle_gagnier
New Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$130
tylers3
Used Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$70
Retail price:
$150
Zachary1256
Used Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$115
Retail price:
$145
LaxDad21
Used Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$65
Retail price:
$135
VikingStringslax
Used Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$100
stpstrings
BN Maverik Optik 3.
0 string with TMD 9D
$117
stpstrings
BN Maverik Optik 3.0 strung with TMD 9Rhombus
$117
BenGoldt
Used Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$90
Retail price:
$100
Itz_Anthony
Maverick Optik 3.0 Lax Head(Used)
$76
Retail price:
$150
sure_shot_strin
Custom Strung Optik 3.0 Head with stringking 5s
$60
Retail price:
$130
hbushnell23
Optik 3.0 Strung w ECD Hero 3.0
$145
Retail price:
$180
BlackHoleString
New Attack & Midfield Maverik Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$115
Retail price:
$150
runngunlax
Used Dyed Maverik Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$60
TheBink512
Used Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$85
Retail price:
$150
Tlewis40
Used Attack & Midfield Unstrung Optik 3.0 Head
$81
Retail price:
$99
tyler_1011
Maverik Optik 3.0 Head Strung with ECD Hero 3.0 mesh (Lightly Used)
$110
Retail price:
$150
Jordy24
Custom Strung Optik 3.
0 Head
$60
Retail price:
$150
Benaround
Maverik Optik 3.0 dyed Blue – Professionally Strung
$155
Retail price:
$190
haydenmoats
Used Maverik Optik 3.0 Head
$55
Retail price:
$100
Aa_shoes101
Used Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$110
Retail price:
$150
aglaxz7
Used Strung Optik 3.0
$60
Retail price:
$90
Nick30
Used Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$53
Retail price:
$140
Hudson277_
Used Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$94
Retail price:
$150
Laxguy123_
New Attack & Midfield Unstrung Optik 3.0 Head
$80
Retail price:
$100
Laxguy123_
New Attack & Midfield Unstrung Optik 3.0 Head
$80
Retail price:
$100
New Maverik Optik 3.0 Custom Dyed
$85
ddamia161
Used Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$81
Retail price:
$120
robertkirkland
New Attack & Midfield Maverik Optik 3.0 Head
$90
IrishStringsLax
Brand New HyperLight BlueMaverik Optik 3.
0 With Stringer’s Shack G3 Ultralight Mesh
$130
robertkirkland
Used Attack & Midfield Unstrung Optik 3.0 Head
$65
Retail price:
$90
andrew_albert_1
Blue Strung Optik 3.0
$95
jamessprague
Used Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$90
Retail price:
$100
New Maverik Optik 3.0 Head
$81
Barely Used Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$85
Retail price:
$100
Bobs0108
New Maverik Optik 3.0 Head
$81
Retail price:
$100
New Maverik Optik 3.0 Head
$90
wcrow16
Used Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$145
Retail price:
$180
wcrow16
New Optic 3.0 On A Maverick Hyperlite Shaft
$235
Retail price:
$270
wcrow16
Used Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$140
Retail price:
$170
NathanMichael20
Used Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$81
Retail price:
$120
HudsonYayes
Hardly Used Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.
0 Head
$110
Retail price:
$150
Emielouroo
Used Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$210
Retail price:
$300
yungmoneyshoota
New Jordan Wolf (PLL Chrome) Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$200
yungmoneyshoota
Used Maverick Optik 3
$100
Hunter_Rovere
New Attack & Midfield Strung Optik 3.0 Head
$115
Retail price:
$130
Optik 3.0 Head Professionally Strung With Hero Mesh
$120
Retail price:
$150
Maverik OPTIK 3 Unstrung Lacrosse Head
Maverik OPTIK 3 Unstrung Lacrosse Head | Source for Sports
Home
Lacrosse
Lacrosse Sticks And Heads
Lacrosse Heads
Maverik OPTIK 3 Unstrung Lacrosse Head
Return Policy
30-Day Return Policy
We understand it is difficult to determine how a product is going to fit when looking at it on a computer screen or mobile device. Because of this, we’ve simplified our return policy making it easier for you to return or exchange products you’ve bought from SourceforSports.
ca and it starts with our no-questions asked 30-Day Return Policy.
Clearance items are considered FINAL SALE and are not eligible for return unless defective.
If you are unsatisfied with your purchase in any way, you can return unused items in new condition within 30 days after purchase for a refund less the cost of shipping.
Read the entire Return Policy here.
Overview
The OPTIK 3 is designed for the elite attackman who initiates the offense. With the addition of Ground Control technology and a shortened throat, this head will improve your accuracy, and control on the offensive end. Used by arguably the best dodging attackman of our generation; Team USA’s Jordan Wolf.
Model # 3003216/3003215/3003213
0 reviews
${ product.price }
${ product.price }
${ product.compare_at_price }
You save
${ product.savings }
413648544401094136485447287741364854505645
Colour:
Something went wrong.
Please try again later.
Go to Cart
Continue Shopping
Overview
The OPTIK 3 is designed for the elite attackman who initiates the offense. With the addition of Ground Control technology and a shortened throat, this head will improve your accuracy, and control on the offensive end. Used by arguably the best dodging attackman of our generation; Team USA’s Jordan Wolf.
- Optimized for Level 2 Bottom Rail.
- Mid-Low pocket
- Optimal Release Point. Increases control with added hold and has extreme energy transfer when shooting.
- Duratough material. Increases stiffness and provides consistency in all weather conditions.
- Tension Lock. Enables the stringer to precisely locate a defined shooting channel for increased accuracy.
- Made in the USA.
Customer Reviews
0 reviews
Sign in to write a review
Write a review
Name
Rating
Title
Content
(${1500 – review.
review_body.length})
characters remaining
${error}
Something went wrong. Please try again later.
Your review has been submitted.
Payment & Security
Apple PayGoogle PayMastercardShop PayVisa
Your payment information is processed securely. We do not store credit card details nor have access to your credit card information.
SAFE CHECKOUTGUARANTEED
Shopping from outside Canada?
Unfortunately, due to vendor restrictions we cannot ship outside of Canada
There are no items in your cart.
We’re Sorry!
We don’t have the quantity you’ve requested. Please enter another quantity.
We’re Sorry!
We can’t find your postal code, please contact support
We’re Sorry!
Something went wrong. Please try again later.
Items will be shipped from the closest store with inventory.
Note: orders may be fulfilled from multiple locations.
Your cart contains items that are ineligible for return.
Clearance items are FINAL SALE and are not eligible for return.
Ship to Home
Items to be shipped from ${ shipment.store_info.store_name }, ${ shipment.store_info.city }, ${
shipment.store_info.province }
Estimated arrival date: ${ shipment.ship_estimate_days }
Estimated arrival date unknown
Pick this item up from ${ shipment.store_info.store_name },
${shipment.store_info.city},
${shipment.store_info.province}
${ shipment.shipping_cost_money }
Free
${ item.product_title }
${ option.name }: ${ option.value }
quantity
quantity
or
Not Available To Ship
or
${ item.
available_quantity } Available
Clearance
Ineligible for Return
Free${ item.price }
Subtotal (${ item.quantity })
${ item.final_line_price }
Order Summary
Postal Code:*
Estimated shipping to: ${ postal_code }
Subtotal
Free
${ subtotal_money }
Estimated Shipping
Free
${ shipping_money }
Shipping Credit
-${ shipping_credit_money }
Estimated Total
Free
${ total }
attributes[locale]
We don’t have the quantity you’ve requested. Please enter another quantity.
Something went wrong. Please try again later.
Taxes will be calculated at checkout
Return Policy
Qualifying sales are covered by our 30-day return policy
(learn more).
Payment & Security
Apple PayGoogle PayMastercardShop PayVisa
Your payment information is processed securely.
We do not store credit card details nor have access to your credit card information.
SAFE CHECKOUTGUARANTEED
Return Policy
30-Day Return Policy
We understand it is difficult to determine how a product is going to fit when looking at it on a computer screen or mobile device. Because of this, we’ve simplified our return policy making it easier for you to return or exchange products you’ve bought from SourceforSports.ca and it starts with our no-questions asked 30-Day Return Policy.
Clearance items are considered FINAL SALE and are not eligible for return unless defective.
If you are unsatisfied with your purchase in any way, you can return unused items in new condition within 30 days after purchase for a refund less the cost of shipping.
Read the entire Return Policy here.
Earn Shipping Credits with orders over $100*. Learn more.
Hang Out with us Socially!
Need Help?
Email: support@sourceforsports.
com
© 2023 Source for Sports
Apple PayGoogle PayMastercardShop PayVisa
Source for Sports is a registered trademark of Sports Distributors of Canada Limited.
Intelligent Charger Power-Stations PS-NC1000
We present you an analogue of chargers La Crosse RS-700 and La Crosse RS-1000, with a number of advantages. Charger Power-Stations PS-NC1000 has a USB output with which you can charge various devices (phones, tablets, players, etc.)
It is designed to charge NI-MH and NiCd “AA” batteries and “AAA” with capacity up to 3000mAh. Different modes can be used for each battery at the same time (TEST, CHARGE, DISCHARGE, RECOVERY). At your request, the charge current is set – 200, 500, 700 and 1000 mA. In addition, the charger gives you information about the charge current, voltage, capacity and charge time of each battery.
Display – information display:
The large liquid crystal display on the charger body is divided into 4 parts, corresponding to the compartments into which the batteries are inserted.
The display can show information about the charge current, voltage, capacity and charging time of each battery.
When you insert the battery into the charger, the display shows the battery voltage in volts (V) to the nearest hundredth. If the battery is not inserted, defective or discharged less than 0.9V, then the screen of the charger displays NULL, which means: “the battery is missing or defective.”
Let’s take a closer look at the capabilities of Power-Stations PS-NC1000 :
CHARGE (CHARGE) is a normal charge. You install the batteries in the charger and select the charge current with the CURRENT button (values 200, 500,700, 1000mA are possible). After the battery is fully charged, the display shows “Full”. With the DISPLAY button, you can view information about the battery voltage, charge current, process time and the amount of mAh applied to the battery. In case of overheating of the batteries, the charging process is suspended, and resumes only after the batteries have cooled down.
DISCHARGE is the mode of battery discharge and subsequent full charge. Used to eliminate the “memory effect” of batteries. The discharge current corresponds to half of the subsequent charge current. In the process of discharging, on the display you see mAh left from the battery, and subsequent charging is identical to the CHARGE mode. This mode is recommended for the first charge cycle of new batteries.
REFRESH is the process of restoring batteries to optimum operating capacity after they have not been used for a long time or have previously been charged in poor quality chargers. The recovery mode starts with a complete discharge of the batteries, and then they are fully charged. Such cycles of discharge and charge are repeated until the increase in battery capacity stops. Depending on the selected current and the condition of the batteries, the recovery process may take a long time, even up to several days. But the result justifies such an investment of time, many batteries do recover almost to their maximum capacity./cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/63861785/Mac_Tigh.0.jpg)
TEST is the actual battery capacity detection mode. Batteries are first fully charged, then fully discharged, and then charged again. The battery capacity will be estimated and shown after the discharge process.
USB OUTPUT – allows you to charge various mobile devices from the built-in USB port when the charger is connected to a 220v network.
Comparison table Power-Station PS-NC1000 and Technoline BC-700:
Share it!
Choosing a modern universal headlamp for activities – Risk.ru
How to choose the best and for adequate funds
Lantern on the head. Yes, imagine there are. Surprisingly for me, but really many do not know and do not use it. Often experienced tourists, if they have not forgotten the lantern at home, see either a hand-made one … (…. substitute the necessary bright epithet yourself), or at best, a wrecked forehead from the nearest kiosk (of course, the pecel seems like a fairy tale to you).
But reliable bright lights have expanded the horizons of mountaineering and tourism by extending daylight hours, enabling night approach, securing many situations in low light, and so on. A lantern is one of the main elements of equipment (well, 2 lanterns are better, speleologists are well aware of this)!
Well, for those who think it’s expensive, I’ll try to explain: You take your equipment seriously (I hope) and don’t buy, for example, any kind of boots on the market, don’t go with a picket instead of an ice ax, etc. Or, for example, an iron, how much it costs not one-time, well, from 1000 r, let’s say. But your life and health, not to mention positive impressions, do not depend on the iron. A lantern is a much more complex engineering design. Developments are going on actively, expensive components are used (in good ones). Every year new solutions and better diodes appear. This is not an iron for you) So why do you buy an iron for 3k, and cannot afford a flashlight for this price ??.
Moreover, it is more multifunctional (to walk with the dog there, if the light is turned off, etc.) and a necessary thing.
Highlights:
1. Forget
already about Petzl and other alp firms, lights are
their side effect, and they are hopelessly behind (if not to say brazenly bred you)) from
lantern builders of our time. On the head, many times better and at the same time so much
you can find the same and cheaper at Nitecore, Fenix, Acebeam, Bright Beam (imagine, they have recently pulled themselves up to a very serious level, especially with the YLP series), ZebraLight, Olight, Armytek, and many
other firms engaged in the design of lanterns.
2. Forget
about batteries, using them in the 21st century is simply criminal, and stupid!
Ni-Mh batteries also probably live out their lives. Although
high-quality Ni-Mh work very successfully in devices sharpened under
standard battery (AA, AAA, etc.) formats. In most cases they
are much inferior to lithium-based batteries (Li-ion).
Of course, they can
need to be used in flashlights and appliances made for batteries, but when purchasing
new Think immediately about progressive energy supply.
For us, hikers, Li-ion is primarily interesting for the most favorable ratio of energy storage to weight,
frost resistance and lack of self-discharge. Well, in relation to the lanterns,
only with Li-ion (3.7V), you can take enough current to realize the potential
modern diodes, and work at high power. And this despite the fact that we have up to 1000 charge chicles
Of course, there is also a pretty cool (in general, in all respects) thing – lithium batteries. But these are still disposable batteries, and by no means cheap. They are good as a backup option, but for all their advantages, they are completely unprofitable economically and are not able to provide enough current for a powerful flashlight (like any 1.5V batteries). At the same time, if you look, they do not have serious advantages over lithium-ion batteries, and in general, consumer characteristics are the same for them, with the exception of voltage, due to which batteries win.
The popularity of 3 * AAA headlamps is due to the fact that this power allows you to make a compact lamp and at the same time almost completely dispense with electronic stuffing. Three batteries without problems will give out the voltage necessary for the diode (up to 3-4V), at the same time they will quickly sink under load, which by itself will limit the current. As a result, the flashlight will not work very brightly and without stabilization, but for a long time, gradually turning into an “electric bull”. From the point of view of “modern lantern building”, such lanterns are an anachronism, and in real life you do not get any advantages from this primitive.
3. Li-ion 18650 batteries – optimal for consumer
properties in lanterns (and not only). This is the optimal combination of capacity, weight,
dimensions, etc. 18650 has the highest practical energy consumption among other batteries. And even for the price they are already much more profitable. Progressive tourists of the XXI century,
I recommend switching to this format completely.
It can also be used in power banks,
and other tourist things, charge with anything, incl. from solar
panels. Good 18650s (and other formats) have already appeared that have an individual usb port without loss in capacity. With respect to any AA formats, the fundamental advantages of Li-ion lie in the spatial and operational convenience, and not just in the dry higher specific energy intensity.
Li-polymer (plate) batteries,
built into lights and stuff, also a good thing, but with a replacement and
interchange can be problematic. Nothing lasts forever, but reliability
It is also determined by modularity and easy replacement of consumables.
If you bother with lightening, there is
many worthy flashlights on batteries 16340 (CR123A / RCR123), 14500 (AA) and more exotic and compact ones,
but you naturally have to pay for weight and volume, primarily in time
work (capacity).
By the way, with regard to the ratio of weight and capacity, yet
systems are quite worthy to live on one (well, maybe 2 more) AA batteries.
It is in the size of 1AA, not to be confused with other options, that relief occurs while maintaining adequate energy density!
Flashlights on AAA are far from optimal (moreover, if you look, an obvious
a perversion created only to sell you batteries) and in fact, with seeming relief, you are carrying extra weight with a low energy density.
that 14500 and other lithium batteries that comply with battery standards
have a voltage of 3.6V and are not suitable for direct replacement of 1.5V batteries, but due to the higher voltage, they are able to give more light. There are also 1.5V lithium batteries
AA and AAA format, but there it eats away the volume, and, accordingly, the capacity, the board
control and also a charging connector (if it is built-in). Li-AA and AAA without charging
require special chargers. That is, such a replacement can rarely be
beneficial.
4. Problem
high beam in the head-on format is practically unsolvable, so you have to
look for a compromise.
In order to throw a normal beam of light into the distance, you need
a deep and wide reflector, or a special TIR lens, and the dimensions of the forehead
they cannot allow it. In theory, the most correct option is not to chase
long-range, and give preference to high-quality flood (scattered) dipped beam,
and additionally use a hand-held long-range flashlight. But in reality, the hands are usually busy,
and there is only one flashlight (at least “at hand”), but you need to shine into the distance. The most convenient are separate
far and near emitters, or on the edge, a scattering curtain (loss of light, and hence energy wasted). Smooth
reflectors can be more effective at a distance, but the light of such has a pronounced
hotspot (bright spot in the center and a paler halo), a matter of taste, but to me this,
seems not very convenient, especially in the near. And here tir-lenses are preferable. Well, you need to understand that the maximum lighting distance indicated by ANSI / PLATO FL1 is the distance at which a beam with an intensity of 0.
25 lm is captured by the device (only you will not see anything there). In reality, the indicator of the maximum working distance must be divided by 2, and at the same time, take into account that these are data for the maximum (turbo) mode, and, accordingly, for the time in which the flashlight can support this mode. As a result, I consider it expedient to focus on the length of a standard climbing rope, 60 m, and this is approximately 120 m. The passport ANSI range of the flashlight. Pursuit
cover the largest range of distances, drives us into a narrow range of choices. AND
if you think that you need a flashlight only for short distances, work in
camp, with a choice it will be easier for you (the choice of lanterns that work only on the near
the distances are richer, and the requirements are, as it were, a little less, you can get by with a cheap and efficient COB LED) However, I recommend focusing on the brands mentioned in the table, and if “the pocket does not pull” then why not lay it down.
We are
Here we will consider the most universal options.
5. So
same important light temperature and color spectrum. There is a pattern here
warmer, better light penetration (snow, fog, etc.), but less
brightness. A compromise should be sought somewhere between 4000K and 5500K. Just as correct
color rendition ( hi-cri ), in addition to pleasing to the eye,
improves safety through better assessment of conditions. Especially important hi-crisnost (high color rendering index CRI (Ra)) in the low beam. More
cold has a greater range (under ideal conditions), and wow effect,
so manufacturers often use it. Understand, Deshman’s non-name LED L2 or
T6 at 7000K, will give a wonderful wow effect, it will seem to you that he really is
hits at 8000 Chinese lumens, compared to a real flashlight at honest 1000lm, but to see the beam, this is not yet
it means that you can see something in it normally.) Well, an important factor is the absence of flicker (PWM), which is not only harmful to the eyes, but also dangerous due to a possible violation of the perception of movement and distance estimation.
Perhaps: concentration of attention decreases; working capacity decreases; there is a feeling of internal discomfort; there is dryness and pain in the eyes; there is an inexplicable decline in mood; there is severe fatigue by the end of the day and difficulty falling asleep. But in general, according to GOSTs: Illumination ripple over 300 Hz does not affect the general and visual performance. GOST R 54945-2012
Get to the point. I see a hiking lantern like this :
1. It should be light
2. Compact
3. Strong and reliable
4. Long-lasting light
5. Light should be pleasing to the eye and not distort perception
6. Have high-quality flood low beam (wide, well-diffused illumination is important at close range)
7. Ability to confidently shine into the distance at least 100 m (ANSI)
8. Do not be afraid of immersion in water
9. Have a convenient and logical operation, a wide range of adjustment.
10. It is desirable to have an additional red light (preferably 5-10lm at least). Well, here it’s really a matter of taste, and the choice is greatly reduced (about red here ), and krishny moonlight (minimum mode up to 10lm) with good color rendering, or warm color temperature, largely replaces it.
11. Charging the flashlight directly is a very nice bonus. You can recharge at any time without additional hassle. But it is often the weak point of the lantern. But there are also flashlights with a power bank function.
12. It is desirable, of course, that the budget does not suffer much during the acquisition.
It seems to be simple, but I have not yet found such a (perfect for me) flashlight) d/1rf4p6BKapFlzGgBBH6uowQJOtgQbFinVuUV8ulEZ8sc/edit?usp=sharing
The table will be updated and edited. In principle, from points 9 to 17, the most universal and optimal options are collected in ascending order of price. Next come more specific options with their own nuances, and more expensive lights.
and the table is more general. Perhaps I, of course, do not know something, or missed something. But, those models that are not included in the table are usually simply not worth the investment and your attention, or, for sure, they have a more profitable alternative in the table. Also, for known reasons, it does not include battery-powered flashlights, and flashlights oriented to the dipped beam (not universal). I didn’t understand large headlights with a remote battery pack either. Whoever really needs this, let him figure it out himself, but at the current level of development, I don’t see much point in such things. I tried to give links to Ali, not because it’s all Chinese (starting from point 6, all serious, worldwide recognized companies specializing in the design and production of lanterns), but because almost everything is sold there (by the way, Vento and others)), often cheaper and with free shipping. In the same way, and there, and in general, I tried to focus on official stores.
Personally, at the moment, I would single out WUBEN h2 and PANDA 3R Bright beam as the most optimal and versatile.
Yes. I don’t consider it advisable to purchase any Boruits (Boruit), because, well, I can report a little and you can take Sofirn SP40, which cannot even be compared with them in terms of quality, reliability and functionality. Although it must be admitted that the custom Neboruit D10 will probably be better and cheaper.
In principle, everything has already been said here before me, well, by me too, and quite competently and loyally (not by me):
Popular:
How to choose a flashlight , video0066
How to choose the right headlamp
Detail: F.A.Q. for choosing flashlights and general theory :
In particular FAQ for choosing a universal headlamp
Brief instructions for choosing 18650 50B which much easier to buy)
0063 Batteries and frost and part 2
Choice of charger for Li-Ion (The easiest solution is LiitoKala chargers with Ali)
Choice of flashlights for 1AA
Power supply for flashlights for 1AA
Optional lights on 2AA
Choice of lights on several (3, 4, 6, 8) elements AA
Choice of lights for hiking and outdoor
Pro lights with variable focus 9006 6
For flashlights with built-in chargers
Power bank with the best capacity/weight ratio maximum for 18650.
.. Somewhere up to 3500-3600 declared mah (and 3300-3400 honest) per 47-50 grams of can weight.Accordingly, for 3 cans you get ~ 170 grams of weight and ~ 10-11 000 mah of capacity. 4 cans ~220 grams and Mach 13.5-14000. Well, plus the cans in the flashlights actually act as a spare for the power bank, and vice versa. Unless, of course, the flashlights are also at 18650. And this is the easiest and most versatile option)
About what the data in the standard specifications of the flashlight means:
ANSI / NEMA FL1 standard and what it means.
The Truth About ANSI NEMA FL1 : What Flashlight Manufacturers Are Hiding
Stabilization, Stepdowns, Thermal Management and Other Tricks
Economy Flashlight: Backups, Stepdowns, Interface
9 0002 What is the difference between a cheap flashlight and a normal one
Small educational program on general principles and structure:
Popular . How to choose LED lamp .
What are lumens, candela, tint, bean, color temperature, Cree T6 and more.
Light characteristics of flashlights
Choosing a hand-held long-range flashlight to help the headlamp
General thoughts about energy supply during a hike https://risk.ru/blog/217862 ))
Petzl against Bright Beam
Found this curious base lights. It seems to be updated. Search by many criteria, almost all, which are indicated in the description of any lamp of famous brands.
Well, please note that much has been written a long time ago. The general principles are well explained and unchanged, but as you may have noticed, the future is moving towards us faster and faster, and the situation in these areas is only getting better.
Ps. He himself has seen the light – help others see the light). This is the best and easiest way to make the world a little better.
The topic is generally extensive, to explain, to prove.
A lot of nuances. Enough for a whole textbook. I didn’t want to bloat the article. Therefore, if you have questions, do not understand something, or do not agree, read the comments below carefully. I tried to answer carefully, and in detail, to everyone (well, sometimes a little emotionally). Under the article there are answers to most likely questions.
pps. Remember physics, especially Ohm’s law! For a correct comparison of the capacity of different batteries, it is worth recalculating in watt hours. The energy density is the sum of Wh
(Wh) \u003d V (V) * Ah (Ah) (multiply the capacitance by the voltage), and the mass of the battery (in our case). Recalculate and everything will become clear to you about the batteries and their abilities. Just remember, the battery assembly resulting from a series connection has the same capacity as a single battery, and the voltage adds up. And with a parallel connection, the capacitance is added, and the voltage remains corresponding to 1 bank.
Well, as for flashlights and other high-current devices, an abstract comparison of batteries will not give anything, since there is also a relationship between the current that the battery gives to the load, its capacity and the relative discharge rate. And in devices where an increase is required, elements with a lower voltage and high internal resistance will lose at times, due to a drop in practical energy intensity, at times. Therefore, using batteries (especially AAA) in sufficiently powerful flashlights can rarely be beneficial.
Well, in the end, it turns out that in practice one 18650 has a greater practical energy consumption than 3AA, and many times better ease of use than 2+ AA sets. It is generally pointless to compare with batteries in isolation from the consumption current, there the results will change many times from it. Usually, the diode in a modern flashlight operates in the region of 3V, which means that there is a booster driver, which, with ~ 1.2-1.3V of the battery, increases the voltage to the working Vf LED.
As a rule, this process is not 100% efficient, but it is good if 90%. To get 150 lumens, you need to take around 0.8 amperes, optimistically if .., and the energy intensity of a high-quality alkaline battery is usually calculated if you discharge it with a current of 200mA. As a result, we will already have several times lower practical energy consumption of batteries at the output. And in the end, in terms of light output, one 18650 is able to replace 4-20 AA and 7-30 AAA elements, of course, depending on their quality, connection scheme and driver, LED and brightness. This is not to mention reusability, service life, ease of charging and use, compactness, etc.
I see that a lot of explanation is needed. But to
do not turn the article into a textbook, I will try to briefly explain with a specific example,
for clarity:
For example, let’s take the popular and universal ACTIK CORE PETZL
From the minuses:
– Main and main – stupid price !! Well, no matter how good Petzl is, she is completely
inadequate product, in comparison with other offers of the modern market.
This
flashlight level for a maximum of 1000-1500r! (from the Chinese brand Sunree, for example.
By the way, this company makes similar lanterns for all brands in a row, familiar shapes
you will see in the catalog, and this is just not a fake. True, the smallness of the office snickered
and their prices have been raised a little, but this is offsite, third-party sellers
they sell cheaper, but the truth is they often make the best equipment for their own
nameplate). And all the pluses are simply annihilated by the price, so is it worth it
Discuss if others have the same.
– PWM at 500 Hz
medium and low modes. It’s sad, but it can also be dangerous. And even more so
strange on sports lights for running or cycling.
– Cold light (taste is probably, but there are many moments and I mentioned some).
– Nutrition. Or very unreasonable 3 * AAA (I hope I have already explained everything about them and
proved), or expensive branded batteries, also mediocre
enough (well, this is generally inadequate when the spare battery costs as normal
flashlight!!).
At least some stabilization in this particular lamp, as I understand it, was not done,
well, they didn’t promise in principle (look for
at least with beautiful words CONSTANT LIGHTING)
– Also look at the rather… strange shape of light he has.
– Well, I don’t know
offhand, its real full weight (there are suspicions that they are lying a little here, well
at least 75g is with CORE, and with batteries it is already 86g). Not such a win
lightness relative to the flashlight at 18650 (and there are almost the same weight),
especially considering the power supply and other things. Yes, and it’s easier to have enough good lights,
not at 18650, and also much more interesting.
– No moisture protection, well, you can say just neatly assembled
a flashlight that does not die under a light rain, and this is against the already standard IPX7-8, yes
and even high-quality plastic is still not as strong and reliable as aviation
an alloy commonly used by others.
– Operating time, effective
the range and convenience of the modes are very doubtful (but more on that later)
shines and principles:
The ANSI / PLATO FL1 standard promises like honest 450 lumens,
and not turbopuff in a few seconds (this is already good), but the drop in brightness is clearly
present, and throughout the schedule.
Well, the range, all according to the same ANSI is
just visible! at 90 meters light (reaching there with an intensity of 0.25 lux!
almost complete darkness, this is such a standard) Light intensity data (Cd,
Kandel) for some reason!0 they don’t give at all, so we generally guess on the coffee grounds.
But it is clearly not necessary to expect that at maximum speed to consider something further than 40m,
don’t be fooled. And you won’t even see the end of a standard rope in any way.
Further, the decrease in brightness goes smoothly and constantly, you won’t notice it, but here and
lies deceit. Well, in terms of runtimes (working time), respectively, it’s also a bit different than in
manufacturer’s label, because there will be a decrease in brightness, and it turns out that
this is a full runtime from switching on to the mode, but not at the same brightness as
which you have included and which you expect. 6lm of cold light is not enough, in
reale as in the full moon approximately, but only exclusively in front of you.
intermediate
there are no values, the next 100lm, and get ready that you will shine at 100 or less,
descending lumens for 8 hours, this is the real runtime. Well, actually you
you get 1 not the most optimal operating mode, with two backup and additional. Red.
Well, or just blurt out a charge in 2 hours (in real life, even a little more due to stepdowns).
In general, this
the standard divorce scheme for inexperienced viewers, present in one or another
degree for everyone)
But, for example, YLP PANDA 3.0 (the most honest scheme) puffing at 1100lm reduces brightness
not by seconds, like many, but by THERMAL CONTROL, and you get honest workers
550lm. Further, all modes are STABILIZED, at what brightness they turned on, and
shines. Accordingly, the runtime is honest (and this is also for not the most capacious
complete battery). And a working runtime of 36h at 35lm (which is really enough
to see everything up close, and at the same time economically), and at 10lm – up to 150 hours.
And
brightness can be freely adjusted as desired, and also the shape of the light beam
control, allows you to get 24 options for the light of the lantern. Well, the distance
of course, also ANSI, but it will somehow enlighten half of the declared 115m. Well
and not to mention the quality of light and real maximum water protection and
shock resistance, as well as a good charge indication and backup mode.
But this is certainly not
the most common example, and more common in expensive flashlights. But more
simple, budget-friendly options provide a broader, more honest, and more tailored
schema for the user. Not everyone needs full stabilization, and relatively
reduces the overall runtime. Thermal control, in fact, only prolongs the time of work in
turbo mode. The truth is often decent manufacturers, trying to show
the biggest numbers are deceiving that the turbo only lasts a couple of seconds and costs
focus on the second brightest mode. And according to the duration of work, “cheating” in
that, for example, 800 hours at 0.
5 lm, it’s not like pitch darkness, but also
not light, and accordingly focus on modes at least more than 10lm. However, everyone basically has
the ability to shine in the region of 1000lm, sure about 500lm, a normal choice
modes and good runtime, as well as moisture protection.
Well, in principle, according to
alternatives. Even if you do not direct full Feng Shui, and if you
Batteries are fundamentally close, offhand, the first one that came across, so to speak. Such a flashlight for example – not without questions
absolutely, but why don’t you Aktik, moreover, with the functionality of a more expensive flashlight? Reliability is unlikely to yield, the same scheme with
batteries and batteries, only much cheaper (almost 3 times!), We also have light
more normal, and, as it were, even stabilization, and water protection, and more realistic modes (their
more, and they are more convenient) and working time. Everything is cooler in general, and on batteries
better price and capacity.
