How do lacrosse face-offs work. What are the key techniques used in face-offs. Why are face-offs crucial in lacrosse. What are the main differences between men’s and women’s face-offs. How can players improve their face-off skills.
Understanding the Basics of Lacrosse Face-Offs
Lacrosse face-offs are a pivotal element of the game, occurring at the start of each quarter and after every goal. These intense one-on-one battles for possession can significantly influence the outcome of a match. But what exactly happens during a face-off?
Face-offs take place at the center of the field, on a spot known as the face-off X. Two opposing players, typically short-stick midfielders, kneel or crouch in an athletic stance, gripping their sticks with both hands to the left of the throat. The official places the ball between their stick heads and, upon blowing the whistle, the players compete to gain possession.
The Importance of Winning Face-Offs
Why are face-offs so crucial in lacrosse? Winning face-offs provides a team with immediate possession, allowing them to control the pace of the game and create scoring opportunities. Teams that consistently dominate face-offs often have a significant advantage, as they can maintain possession for longer periods and limit their opponents’ chances to score.
Essential Face-Off Techniques in Lacrosse
Mastering face-off techniques is crucial for players looking to excel in this specialized role. Let’s explore some of the most effective methods used by face-off specialists:
- Clamp: A quick maneuver to trap the ball with the back of the stick
- Double Over: A powerful grip technique for enhanced control during the clamp
- Plunger: A swift downward motion to secure the ball and pull it backward
- Rake: A forward-and-back motion to scoop the ball into the stick pocket
The Art of the Clamp
How does the clamp technique work in lacrosse face-offs? The clamp involves swiftly trapping the ball with the back of the lacrosse stick as soon as the whistle blows. After successfully clamping the ball, the player can use their body to shield their opponent, release the clamp, and scoop the ball into their crosse to initiate play.
Mastering the Double Over
The double over grip is a powerful technique that can give players an edge during face-offs. To execute this move, the player wraps their hands around the top of the stick handle, similar to gripping motorcycle handlebars. This grip allows for increased power and control during the initial clamp, potentially leading to more successful face-offs.
Face-Off Rules and Violations in Lacrosse
Understanding the rules and potential violations during face-offs is crucial for players and coaches alike. What are the main rules governing lacrosse face-offs?
- Players must not touch the centerline with their stick or any body part before the whistle
- Hands cannot be used to handle the ball directly
- Players are prohibited from holding their opponent’s crosse with their own
- Holding the ball to the ground under the pocket for an extended period is illegal
- Using the head or helmet to push an opponent away from the ball is not allowed
Teams are permitted two face-off violations per half without incurring a time-serving penalty. However, after the third violation, the in-home player must serve a 30-second technical penalty. This rule encourages fair play and discourages repeated infractions during face-offs.
The Role of FOGO Players in Lacrosse
In recent years, the specialization of face-off players has led to the emergence of FOGO (Face-Off, Get Off) specialists. But what exactly is a FOGO player, and how do they contribute to a team’s success?
FOGO players are midfielders who focus primarily on winning face-offs. Once the face-off is complete and possession is established, these players typically exit the field immediately, allowing a fresh midfielder to take their place. This specialization allows teams to have a dedicated face-off expert without sacrificing offensive or defensive capabilities in other areas of the field.
The Debate Surrounding FOGO Specialists
The rise of FOGO specialists has sparked debate within the lacrosse community. Some argue that these players add an exciting strategic element to the game, while others contend that over-specialization may limit overall player development. Regardless of one’s stance, it’s clear that FOGO players have become an integral part of many successful lacrosse teams.
Comparing Men’s and Women’s Lacrosse Face-Offs
While both men’s and women’s lacrosse feature face-offs, there are significant differences in how they are conducted. In women’s lacrosse, the equivalent of the face-off is called a “draw.” How does a draw differ from a traditional face-off?
- Players stand upright instead of kneeling or crouching
- The ball is placed between the players’ stick heads, not on the ground
- Players draw their sticks up and overhead to put the ball in play
- Raking is not allowed in women’s lacrosse draws
Despite these differences, the fundamental goal remains the same: to gain possession and create scoring opportunities for one’s team.
Strategies for Improving Face-Off Performance
For players looking to enhance their face-off skills, consistent practice and a focus on technique are essential. What are some effective strategies for improving face-off performance?
- Develop quick reaction times through repetitive drills
- Strengthen core and lower body muscles for improved stability
- Practice various face-off techniques to adapt to different opponents
- Study opponent tendencies and develop counter-strategies
- Work on hand-eye coordination to improve ball control
Coaches can help players improve by incorporating face-off drills into regular practice sessions and providing individualized feedback on technique and positioning.
The Importance of Mental Preparation
Success in face-offs isn’t just about physical skills; mental preparation plays a crucial role as well. Face-off specialists should focus on developing a strong mental game, including visualization techniques, stress management, and maintaining focus under pressure.
The Impact of Face-Offs on Overall Game Strategy
How do face-offs influence a team’s overall game strategy? Coaches must consider the strength of their face-off specialists when developing game plans. Teams with dominant face-off players may adopt more aggressive offensive strategies, knowing they have a higher likelihood of maintaining possession. Conversely, teams struggling in face-offs might focus on defensive strategies to compensate for fewer possessions.
The ability to win face-offs consistently can also impact substitution patterns, time management, and risk-taking during crucial moments of the game. As such, face-offs have become an integral part of lacrosse strategy at all levels of play.
Adapting to Face-Off Success or Failure
Coaches must be prepared to adjust their strategies based on face-off performance during a game. If a team is dominating face-offs, they may look to capitalize on this advantage by pushing the tempo and seeking quick scoring opportunities. On the other hand, teams struggling with face-offs might focus on creating turnovers and maximizing efficiency during their limited possessions.
The Evolution of Face-Off Techniques and Equipment
As lacrosse has evolved, so too have the techniques and equipment used in face-offs. How have face-off strategies changed over time? In recent years, players have developed increasingly specialized techniques, often borrowing concepts from wrestling and other combat sports to gain an edge during the face-off.
Equipment manufacturers have also responded to the growing importance of face-offs by developing specialized heads and shafts designed to provide better control and quicker ball movement during face-offs. These advancements have led to ongoing discussions about equipment regulations and their impact on the game.
The Future of Lacrosse Face-Offs
What does the future hold for lacrosse face-offs? As the sport continues to grow and evolve, it’s likely that we’ll see further refinement of face-off techniques and strategies. Some experts predict an increased focus on analytics to inform face-off decisions, while others anticipate rule changes aimed at balancing the impact of face-offs on overall game flow.
Regardless of how face-offs evolve, they will undoubtedly remain a crucial and exciting aspect of lacrosse, demanding skill, strategy, and split-second decision-making from players and coaches alike.
Lacrosse Face Off Rules
Faceoffs
The face-off is an essential element of the game of lacrosse that occurs at frequent intervals throughout the game. In a face-off, two members of the opposing teams, usually short-stick midfield players, battle 1-on-1 for possession of the ball close to the ground. Coaches emphasize the importance of winning the face-off; if one team can control the face-offs and earn outright possession or the ensuing loose ball consistently, they are much more likely to win the game. In this tutorial, we will cover the basic procedure of the face-off, review basic face-off techniques, outline face-off violations and distinguish between the face-off procedures in the men’s and women’s game.
FaceOff Procedure
A face-off is administered by the official at the start of each quarter and after each goal. The face-off occurs at the face-off X, located in the center of the field on the centerline. One player from each team – almost always a short-stick midfielder – lines up in their defensive half at the centerline.
The opposing players kneel or crouch in an athletic stance on the ground, holding a two-handed grip on the shaft to the left of the throat. Prior to the whistle, each stick is parallel to the other with the sidewalls upright and on the ground. Players must not touch the centerline with their stick or any part of the body.
The official sets the ball in the middle of each pocket and blows the whistle to start play. The centers then use stick techniques and body positioning to win possession of the ball. A face-off is considered over when one team gains clear possession or the ball travels out-of-bounds.
During a face-off, a team at full strength must keep three defensemen plus the goalkeeper in the defensive area, three attackmen in the offensive area and one player in each wing area. Once the whistle blows, the players may release and move towards the face-off X to help win a loose ball or get open for the next pass.
Face-Off Techniques
The player responsible for taking the face-off must have a fast reaction time, be agile and use physical strength to outmaneuver their opponent.
Because face-off play is so critical to the outcome of the game, coaches deploy specialty teams or FOGO players. FOGO stands for “face-off, get off” and indicates a center who immediately exits the field after the face-off ends and the ball transitions to either the defensive or offensive half. Here is a list of different types of grips and stick techniques used during a face-off.
- Clamp
- Double Over
- Plunger
- Rake
Clamp
A clamp in lacrosse is the action of quickly trapping the ball with the back of the lacrosse stick during a face off. After a successful clamp, the center can use their body to block their opponent, release the clamp hold on the ball and scoop the ball into their crosse to begin play.
Double Over
The double over in lacrosse is when a face-off player wraps their hands around the top of the stick at the top of the handle as if riding a motorcycle or bicycle. This tactic allows for more power on the clamp during a face-off.
Plunger
A plunger in lacrosse is a slang term for a face-off tactic to gain possession of the ball. The center quickly snaps the back of their stick pocket down over the ball and pulls the ball back toward the butt end.
Rake
A rake in lacrosse is a way of picking up the ball by running the top of the pocket forward over the top of the ball and then pulling the stick back in to the body. Raking is illegal in women’s lacrosse.
Face-Off Violations
There are several illegal actions that can occur during a face-off. A player may not use their hands to handle the ball or hold the opponent’s crosse with their own crosse. Face-off play is intended to be quick, so a player receives a penalty if they hold the ball to the ground under the pocket for too long. Players cannot use their head or helmet to push their opponent away from the ball. Teams are allowed two face-off violations in one half without incurring a time-serving penalty. After the third violation, the in-home player must serve a 30-second technical penalty.
Draw vs. Face-Off
In women’s lacrosse, the equivalent of the face-off is the draw. As in the men’s game, the players hold their sticks parallel with the sidewalls facing up, but they stand upright and the ball is placed in between the opposing players’ pockets. The centers quickly draw their sticks up and overhead to put the ball in play. Similar rules apply to the positioning of other field players around the center circle and behind the restraining line.
The Lacrosse Faceoff Specialist: Fan or Foe
The Lacrosse faceoff specialist. Now there’s a topic for debate, isn’t it? It’s the only time in a game when you get to actually clamp a ball and pin it to the ground before making a move to get it up and out onto the playing field. Some like it, some hate it, but it’s a big part of the game and controversial every time it happens.
The Fan
If you can win the majority of your faceoffs, you’ll always have the upper hand in possessions. That goes without saying, but that is exactly why a faceoff is so important.
Throw out any other facet of the game, but if you win most of the faceoffs, your chances of winning become exponential.
Which is why a lacrosse faceoff specialist is so incredibly valuable. That specialist doesn’t have to do anything else during the game, which is why they are referred to as a FOGO, and for you people out there who don’t know what that is, it’s Face Off and Get Out. They come on for the faceoff, and once it’s over, they get off the field. That’s it.
This is a very specialized and a very athletic position. You need swift wrists to clamp, pinch or rake the ball, and a big muscular body to jam the opponents stick effectively. Above everything else, you need to be as quick as a cat when you are in the scrum, and those that dedicate themselves to this discipline, and concentrate on the specific movements involved, are going to come out of there with the rock most of the time.
That specialization alone should be applauded, because only the best of the best are going to succeed here, and the coach is right in using them during every faceoff.
The Foe
In the purest sense, a Lacrosse player should be equally good at everything. Running, passing, scoring and facing off, which is what the game is all about. But having a specialized player who just does faceoffs, remember FOGO here, and who may not be particularly good at anything else, almost goes against the spirit of the game.
Clamping the ball to the ground is a serious no-no on the field, but it is perfectly acceptable on the faceoff. And if you have a person who is explicitly trained to do just that, and only that, that’s akin to being unfair.
In fact, there are actually training regimens just for the face off now, and regardless of any other skill a player possess, if they are consistent winners on a faceoff, they will, most assuredly, make the team. You can even get partial scholarships if you are a killer during the faceoff. Talk about a one hit wonder!
It has come down to this. You could take some person off the street, give them a stick, and if they win faceoffs, they’ve just automatically become one of the most valuable members on the team./cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/60754941/Hilburn24230.0.jpeg)
Heck, even pinch hitters in baseball, another specialized position, get to swing away at several pitches, but a dedicated FOGO player is only in for a few seconds on each faceoff. That hardly seems right now, does it?
The Rules Are the Rules
The rules make no real distinction between a dedicated faceoff specialist and a regular Lacrosse player, but there have been slight changes in an attempt to limit a great faceoff players dominance. You can no longer take more than one step once you’ve clamped the ball down, which makes it a little tougher to get it out of the scrum, and the back of the stick can no longer be used for picking up and/or carrying the ball. Does it help? Sure it helps, but it doesn’t change much, and faceoff specialists still rule the scrum.
The bottom line here is this. Whether you are a fan or a foe, it doesn’t matter. The faceoff specialist is one of the most important parts of the game of Lacrosse, it’s not going anywhere, and you either accept it and work to better yourself or your team, or plan on losing a lot.
That choice is yours.
Lacrosse Faceoff Drills on the App Store
Faceoff Practice to Build speed and Win More Faceoff’s! This App plays the role of the official calling Down, Set and Random Whistle, and calls out MOVEMENT VIOLATIONS!!
LIght Version of Lacrosse Faceoff Drills PRO, configured with standard settings. Please refer to Lacrosse Faceoff Drills PRO to enable all features and timer controls.
Ask any successful FOGO specialist, college or pro, the secrets to consistently winning face-offs, and they will tell you – constant drilling. Effective drills improve reaction time, hand-eye coordination, arm strength and technique. This App provides you with the necessary tools to perform these drills and can be used alone or with a partner. The three apps in one will enable you to achieve your FOGO goals and win more face-offs – giving your team the competitive advantage of possession time.
What are the FOGO drills and how do I use the App?
The App was designed with three drills in mind – The Chop, The Clamp and the Full Face-Off.
Perform these drills or create your own using the tools provided in the app.
The Chop:
Assume faceoff SET position with ball at X and your shaft parallel to the mid-field line. Holding the end of the stick firmly against the turf with your left hand, lift the head of the stick over the ball and back – in rapid succession. Count how many reps you can complete in the chosen amount of time. Repeat this drill for 3 sets. You will notice a significant burn in your arm – which will ultimately contribute to you being quicker and stronger off the whistle.
The Clamp:
This drill is designed to improve your reaction time to the whistle and establish muscle memory to win position on the Clamp technique. Set the option to the desired number of reps and click start. With each whistle, the objective is to clamp quickly – and return to starting position. Over time, this drill will foster an automatic response to the whistle resulting in more faceoff wins.
Full Face-Off:
This drill allows for practice of the full face off – from directing the ball through grabbing the ground ball.
When practicing alone, use this drill to practice a full faceoff technique – repeatedly.
When drilling with a partner, select the desired settings in the options – and faceoff against a live opponent with a random referee cadence. No third parties needed and no advantage to either player starting the drill.
NCAA changes complexion of faceoffs, as UAlbany men’s lacrosse opens season
ALBANY — With apologies to The Clash, faceoff guys may not be working for the clampdown anymore.
They will still have to follow some rules from The Establishment, though. New ones.
When the UAlbany men’s lacrosse team opens the 2021 season at noon on Saturday with a home game against Colgate, the teams will be subject to changes in how faceoffs are conducted, as the NCAA moved last summer to try to curtail the clamping technique and time-consuming stalemates.
Faceoff specialists will no longer be allowed to put their back knee on the ground or hold the stick in the “motorcycle grip,” with both palms facing down.
The “standing neutral grip” — both knees off the ground, top hand facing palm up, bottom hand palm down — has always been available as an option; now it’s mandatory.
In the clamp move, a faceoff specialist tries to beat his opponent off the whistle and pin the ball on the ground with the back of the stick head, then examine his angles to gain full possession, usually raking it out to a wing man or finding a way to flip it out to himself.
The rule change has not been met with much enthusiasm by those who practice this highly technical craft, but the reality is that this is how they’ll have to do business now. In UAlbany’s case, that will affect senior Anthony Altimari and freshman Regan Endres the most against Colgate, as head coach Scott Marr said they’ll get the bulk of the faceoff work to start the season.
“It’s an adjustment they had to make,” Marr said. “I still think it has a lot to do with just who’s quicker on the whistle to get the ball out. Those type of things won’t be too different.
The kids that just have that good twitch muscle and that reaction time to a whistle blowing, they’ll get it out quicker.
“It depends on who you’re playing and how the game’s going, but I think there should be some more wing play involved. So it could make for some more ground ball play among the wings. But so far, the one game I watched, Colgate-Robert Morris, it was some pretty good action.”
“It’s the game within the game,” said Siena head coach Liam Gleason, who played two seasons at UAlbany and was Marr’s associate head coach for seven seasons.
“I do think with wing play, one thing I’m noticing with the rule change is we used to have what you would call a stalemate, where they both go for the clamp and they’d be 50-50 and both on the ball and spinning around, and your wings would get in there and just be boxing each other out waiting for the ball. You’re not seeing that as much. The ball is getting out a lot quicker.”
In announcing the 2021 rule changes, which also enforces dives by offensive players into the goalmouth more strictly, the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel said, “Previously, players could start a faceoff on one knee and use a motorcycle grip, in which the stick is held with both palms down.
Members of the NCAA Men’s Lacrosse Rules Committee felt this led to increased clamping of the ball and long stalemates.
“With the new rule, players will have to move the ball in a continuous motion. If the ball is withheld in a player’s stick, a violation will be called, and the opposing team will be awarded possession of the ball.”
It may seem like an insignificant change to those who aren’t responsible for grinding away trying to gain leverage or looking for a sneaky-quick pickpocket, but the world of faceoff specialists is more complicated than it may appear.
“Sidewall dominant moves” aren’t just for car tire engineers, and “progressive rake variations” aren’t just for gardeners.
So when the NCAA removes some tools from the toolbox, the faceoff people aren’t going to take it lightly.
Former Great Dane TD Ierlan, the all-time NCAA Division I leader in total career faceoffs won and career percentage who transferred to Yale, told Lax Sports Network in June, when the new rules were on the table but not yet ratified, that eliminating one approach to faceoffs actually will make the disparity between the good specialists and the average ones greater.
He also questioned whether it would have an impact on the number of stalemates.
“Tie-ups-wise, you’re going to get all those 50-second tie-ups still, it’s not like those are gone,” he said in the interview. “Because you have two guys pushing into the ball with supinated wrists, and you can’t use your motorcycle grip to come over top and finish the clamp. You have to just sit there and push into it. So you’re going to get guys, which I noticed are in 80-20 battles, the guy with 20% is not going to leave, because then the other guy’s just going to get the clamp. The guy with 80% doesn’t feel comfortable enough to exit the ball.”
See? It’s complicated.
This is simple, though: the rule is here for 2021, so one more test for coaches and players will be how to gain advantages within that context.
“I don’t necessarily agree with the whole stalemate thing,” Marr said. “I don’t know where they came up with that. Your top guys, they’re in and out so quick, there was no chance for a stalemate.
Maybe with two average guys, but to me it wasn’t so much the stalemate as it was trying to eliminate one guy really being able to dominate and put the ball to himself.
“Personally, one of the suggestions I’ve made for years is for us to bring the wing guys into the circle, like where the girls would do theirs, so we would be closer and it would really be a 3-on-3. But they didn’t adopt that. I was a little disappointed in that.”
“These guys have put in hundreds and thousands of hours of training one way,” Gleason said. “A lot of people want to say it’s not a big adjustment, but those are the people that didn’t put the same amount of hours that these guys did into their craft. They certainly, like any good faceoff guy will be able to do, will be able to adjust. There are probably a lot of things that, if you could do them well with the old rule, you can probably still do well.
“Faceoff guys have to be good ground-ball guys. They have to be quick to react on the whistle.
You’ve got to have quick hands. Everybody’s forced to do it, and you hope it’s still an equal playing field.”
COLGATE UP FIRST
The Great Danes had their 2020 season cut short to five games because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and almost a year later, their 2021 season — at least the roster portion of it — will feel the effects of the pandemic, too.
UAlbany will be without 11 players, including USILA preseason All-American honorable mention senior attack Tehoka Nanticoke, who are sidelined as they come out of various stages of quarantine.
The Great Danes still feel good about their Saturday game at Fallon Field against Colgate, which gave up eight straight goals spanning the second and third quarters to lose to Robert Morris 17-14 last week.
“Last year, we were looking at a season where we lost to Maryland by one,” senior goalie Will Ramos said. “We’re starting a lot of the same guys, and I think everyone improved during the offseason, and we’re all fired up and ready to go.
”
“It’s a feeling I can say I’ve never really ever felt,” junior defenseman Tanner Hay said. “Not knowing if you’re going to have a season, and then to be able to come back and now have our first game, it’s surreal, it’s crazy.”
UAlbany was supposed to have opened last weekend at Lehigh, but Lehigh backed out because its roster had been depleted by COVID and injuries, and the team had also lost too many practice days to be sufficiently ready for a game.
“It was disappointing, but as a team, we did a great job of bringing that competitive [spirit] and overall adrenaline to practice this week and just get ready for Colgate,” Hay said.
Besides Nanticoke, Marr said the quarantine group who will miss the Colgate game includes Ron John, Graydon Hogg, Darien LaPietro, Danny Mastropaolo and defenseman Will Pepe.
Nanticoke and Hogg accounted for nine of UAlbany’s 13 goals in the last game of the 2020 season, a 14-13 loss to No. 4 Maryland on March 7.
“Certainly coming into the season, our outlook with the team and the talent we have coming back is very optimistic.
I’m excited to get this group together … eventually,” Marr said. “And make a run at this thing for the conference championship and hopefully the playoffs.
“They [Colgate] gave up 17 goals, but they scored 14, so they certainly look athletic, and it’ll be a good contest. It’ll be their second game, and we haven’t played in, like, 357 days, something like that. It’s been a long time.
“It’ll be a fun day for us.”
More from The Daily Gazette:
Categories: College Sports, Sports
Quint: Keep the Face-Off, Eradicate the FOGO
(Inside Lacrosse Photo: Bobbie Arlotta)
I love the face-off. It’s a vital and unique facet of lacrosse. The anticipation, tension, hectic and frantic action leading to potential transition is enjoyable to watch and fun to contest. Face-offs control momentum. They trigger scoring runs and leave alive the opportunity for an epic comeback. They dictate game flow.
Lacrosse needs the face-off; it’s an essential element of the game.
(Inside Lacrosse Photo: John Baker)
I dislike the concept of a FOGO, that is the acronym for face off, get off. The modern FOGO is a specialist who has become a key ingredient in building a championship team. His specific skill, mastery of nuance and technique are undeniable. Watch a college or pro team practice. The four guys off in the corner on a knee are the face-off men. Like Napoleon in exile on Elba, they spend hours in their outdoor lab crouched over the ball. Their sticks are scientific experiments designed to create an edge. A true turf troll wears a knee sleeve and has had surgery more than once on joints and appendages that have broken down from repeated use. Other than remedial stick work drills, scrimmaging and conditioning, he is on his own island, unable to seamlessly fit into the team offense and dependent on the defense to switch into a defensive package that accounts for his inabilities. He is a kicker, a non player.
It’s time for FOGO to stand up and face the music.:format(jpeg)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/30825065/rp_primary_nikeuniformgraphic.0.jpg)
(Inside Lacrosse Photo: Bobbie Arlotta)
The NCAA Men’s Lacrosse Rules Committee has reportedly proposed outlawing the motorcycle grip and knee down stance. They have banned legitimate and universal techniques. It feels as if they are trying to eradicate clamping down on the ball into the ground and the circular wrestling match, where players are locked onto each other and the ball, spinning like a merry-go-round. The ball should always be free. The aim of the new adjustments in stance would be quicker outs.
For some turf trolls, there goes a lifetime of training. Three basic techniques will become the new norm — a “clamp,” “rake” and “top” will be the starting point.
But let’s face the facts. Trying to adjust the face-off to please everybody (players, coaches, refs, fans) is pointless. Every time the rułe book is amended, the new rules create unintended consequences. FOGO nation is hard working, smart, clever and devious. They will find ways to adjust… and cheat.
Just win baby. They will engineer new methods to stay a step ahead of the posse.
(Inside Lacrosse Photo: Tom Huppmann)
At quick glance, the new rules will bring back fingering of the opponents stick and brushing or grabbing the ball. The hunger for gaining an advantage, legal and illegal never abates, and the players always are a step or two ahead of the officials. How can refs identify malicious technique when they don’t know what they are looking for? We need better referee education.
I have to come clean, I used to take face-offs. Splitting time between goalie and midfield through eighth grade and then playing midfield during summer league in college, I took draws and ran a standard two-way shift. That’s when dinosaurs roamed the earth and guys like Andy Kraus, Jon Reese, Paul Cantabene, Andy Towers, Chris Flynn, Ryan Wade, Rodney Tapp, Jamie Hanford, Peter Jacobs, and Kyle Harrison scrapped for possession and played a normal shift… if not the entire game.
Like the Tyrannosaurus, this species of lacrosse athlete has become nearly extinct. The latest rule change is an archeological dig, a conservation attempt.
(Inside Lacrosse Photo: Jamie Wilson)
Will these rules proposals get official approval from the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel, the lone group that appears to stand in between last week’s reported proposals and these amendments to the rule book? The panel roster consists of athletic administrators who wouldn’t know a lacrosse ball if it shattered their office window and hit them in the face. I think they’ll just rubber stamp what the sport-specific committee recommended.
However, there is one additional factor to consider. If fall lacrosse is canceled by COVID-19, are any rules changes smart? That answer is no. Repeat after me — if fall lacrosse is canceled, there should be no rules changes. It’s not fair to enact change without the opportunity to practice and adjust.
I’m a huge fan of the face-off.
To save it, I propose a simple rule.
(Inside Lacrosse Photo: John Baker)
No player can take two face-offs, until every player has taken one. The craft is elevated with this proposal, face-offs become a team endeavor. All players must learn the skill. Coaches submit a card to the refs with players in a pre determined face-off order. If the player listed becomes injured, in the penalty box or unavailable, that draw becomes a forfeit. All players must learn the craft.
The other obvious suggestion has been to close the substitution box, and make the FOGO stay on the field and actually play the game. Unfortunately, coaches are content to play hang man, standing the FOGO in isolation, outside the perimeter of the normal half-field structure. They are comfortable playing five on five. Standing motionless like a statue in a museum for all to gaze at: “Look at me, I’m not capable of playing with the group. I’m a hunchback that can’t catch and throw, I can’t dodge.
“
Keep the face-off, eradicate the FOGO.
(Inside Lacrosse Photo: Jaclyn Borowski)
Fritz an X-factor on faceoffs for Wissahickon – PA Prep Live
HORSHAM >> Matt Fritz is one of Wissahickon’s smallest players but has no trouble filling one of his team’s most important roles.
The faceoff man in lacrosse is one of the most unique positions in sports and one that can have a huge impact on the outcome of a game. Fritz, a 5-foot-6 senior for the Trojans, may not tower above any other players but he’s built perfectly to thrive on the faceoff X.
Tuesday, Fritz put in another dominating effort, going 14-4 in his faceoffs as Wissahickon rushed by Hatboro-Horsham 20-5.
“It’s a sport within a sport,” Fritz said. “I’m training almost every day, I take a lot of reps at it, I have specific coaches that help me with it. I come from a wrestling background and that’s something where you have to be relentless which I think has helped me out.
”
Fritz gravitated to lacrosse and faceoffs in middle school but he got his start athletically as a wrestler when he was just 5 years old. That shouldn’t be surprise given his family bloodline in wrestling. Matt’s father Bernie was an All-American wrestler at Penn State while his uncle John Fritz was a national champion with the Nittany Lions and later served as the program’s head coach in the 1990s.
His background also is a key to his success, as Fritz is able to blend the individual skills needed to compete in wrestling with the team aspects of lacrosse.
Unlike many team sports where a team that just got scored on gets the ball to start the next possession, lacrosse puts it up for grabs, which is where the faceoff unit comes in. While each team gets three guys – one on the X and two on the wings – on the field, it comes down to that one-on-one battle in the middle of the field.
“There’s definitely a prototypical faceoff guy,” Fritz said. “You want a low center of gravity, quick hands and someone who is mentally strong.
That’s where wrestling has really come in a lot for me.
“A lot of people aren’t as mentally strong for the position because it’s hard to go 100 percent winning every faceoff. You’re still failing and some people may let one failure get to them. You have to understand it’s not going to go the way you want it to every single faceoff and just look to the next one.”
Wissahickon senior faceoff/midfielder Matt Fritz. (Andrew Robinson/MediaNews Group)
Fritz joked his bio lists him at 5-foot-7 and not 5-foot-6 but the astounding transformation is the one he makes when wrestling season ends and he gears up for lacrosse. Fritz wrestled at 145 pounds for Wiss, where he was a league champion and district qualifier during his four-year career, but on Tuesday said he’s now about 165 pounds.
“The first thing I make sure is that I don’t try to bulk up all at once, if I did that I’d be putting on some bad weight,” Fritz said. “To be honest, in wrestling season I’m in a lot better shape but I need that extra weight for lacrosse so I’m mixing in cardio, lifting and be cautious of what I eat.
”
On Tuesday, Fritz started out pretty even with Hatters faceoff man David Benjamin but the Wiss senior began to assert himself toward the end of the first quarter. The ideal scenario for a faceoff man is to get the first move right off the whistle, clamp the ball and come up with the possession.
That wasn’t the case Tuesday, so Fritz was able to adapt and use his wingers by playing the ball off the X and letting them gather up the ensuing ground balls.
“Helping the team is what I want to do,” Fritz said. “What I’ve been trying to perfect is the mental aspect of it. I feel like I have the physical aspects to it and I’ve been facing off for years but that mental aspect is huge. I would say it’s about 80 percent mental and you balance not getting too high or too low on yourself and treating each one like it’s 0-0 and you want to win the next one has helped me to try and go 1-0 every time and get the ball back for my team.”
Fritz also plays for Big 4 HHH, a top club lacrosse program that he credits for really helping him hone and refine his faceoff skills.
His standout abilities put him on the college radar and in January of 2020, Fritz committed to play Division I lacrosse at Ohio State.
The senior had plenty of suitors from top programs like Syracuse and Denver and local programs like Lehigh and Lafayette among others but felt Ohio State provided the right mix of big school, quality lacrosse program and an abundance of academic options for him to pursue.
“I’m fortunate to have had many great opportunities playing for a top club lacrosse team and it allowed me to showcase my abilities and talent so I’m forever grateful for those opportunities,” the senior said. “It was flat-out just the people at Ohio State. I feel like they have the best coaching staff and even the academic advisors, it all felt like family and I’m huge into that. It’s like a brotherhood up there and they really take pride in that.”
Fritz, a Blue Bell native, is one of 10 seniors on the Trojans’ roster this spring and they’re looking to send a message after losing out on their junior season.
Wiss has proven its mettle, dropping one-goal games to state powers Springfield-Delco and Conestoga but also picking up a win over another Central League force in Garnet Valley over the weekend.
Much like Fritz is a smaller guy not to be overlooked, the Trojans are hoping to put the rest of District 1 on notice once the postseason rolls around in May.
“Our ultimate goal is to win a state championship but we also can’t look at the grand scheme of things, we have to take it one opponent at a time,” Fritz said. “We’re out to show who we are every game. Every single game, we want to earn our respect.
“We’ve known what we’ve been brewing at Wissahickon but we also take pride in knowing we are the underdogs when you look at some of the Central League powers or teams like La Salle that expect to contend for state titles every year.”
Wissahickon senior Matt Fritz comes away with a faceoff win against Hatboro-Horsham during their game on Tuesday, April 27, 2021. (Andrew Robinson/MediaNews Group)
No matter where the season ends up for the Trojans, Fritz is savoring this final season with the guys he grew up playing the game of lacrosse with.
“We take it seriously, but we do like to have fun, you can’t be all serious all the time,” Fritz said. “It’s important to enjoy the moment, some of us are going to be playing in college but we always talk about how nothing really compares to high school lacrosse.
We want to take nothing for granted because after this season, we want to look back on the success as one thing but we also want to remember all the fun we had together.”
WISSAHICKON 20, HATBORO-HORSHAM 5 >> The Trojans (8-3, 5-0 SOL American) remained unbeaten in SOL play with a balanced offensive effort. As a team, Wiss went 18-9 on faceoffs and had four players score at least three goals, led by Kyle Lehman’s five-goal, one-assist afternoon.
Brody Myers had four goals and five ground balls, most as a faceoff winger, while Sam Baker and Dean Wolfe each had a hat-trick. Jackson Intrieri had a goal and four assists.
Hatboro-Horsham goalie Bredan Kirn faced a barrage of shots but stood firm with 18 saves. Alex Cirmanera had three of the Hatters’ goals.
WISSAHICKON 20, HATBORO-HORSHAM 5
WISSAHICKON 7 7 5 1 – 20
HATBORO-HORSHAM 1 0 1 3 – 5
Goals-Assists: W – Kyle Lehman 5-1, Brody Myers 4-0, Dean Wolfe 3-1, Sam Baker 3-0, EJ Schreiner 1-0, Jackson Intrieri 1-4, Ethan Glass 1-0, Andrew Slackman 1-0, Jason Michaels 1-0; HH – Alex Cirmanera 3-0, Min Lee 1-0, Sam Fink 1-0.
Faceoff struggles bury No. 4 Syracuse in 15-14 loss to No. 2 Duke
Get the latest Syracuse news delivered right to your inbox.
Subscribe to our sports newsletter here.
The game’s opening faceoff was a scramble that Jakob Phaup lost, one that started with Peter Dearth falling on top of Duke’s faceoff specialist and finished with the ball in the back of SU’s net. Moments later, Duke’s faceoff specialist got the better of Phaup once again, scooping up a ground ball that led to another Duke goal.
Syracuse hardly touched the ball for the first two minutes and already trailed by two. The opening minutes set the tone for what would become a struggle at the faceoff X for Syracuse on Thursday. The Orange conceded a 7-0 run in the second quarter that stemmed from just 4-of-20 faceoff wins in the first half. Syracuse erased a seven-point deficit but lost the game’s last four consecutive faceoffs as it let a 14-13 lead slip to a 15-14 loss in the final seven minutes.
Syracuse’s Phaup and Danny Varello won just 8-of-32 faceoffs (25%) against No. 2 Duke’s Jake Naso in Durham, North Carolina. It marked the first time Syracuse has lost the faceoff battle since May 2019 against Loyola and the lowest faceoff win percentage since Feb. 2018 against Albany (21.7%). The Orange recorded three faceoff violations in the first half and had to play a man down on one faceoff later in the second quarter. And because SU wasn’t used to playing with so many faceoff losses, it had to figure out other ways to generate offense without frequent ball possession, head coach John Desko said postgame.
“When you’re not winning faceoffs, you have to learn how to play like that. Some teams know how to play because, consistently, they lose faceoffs,” Desko said. “We haven’t.”
Advertisement
Ahead of No. 4 Syracuse’s (4-2, 1-1 Atlantic Coast) matchup with No. 2 Duke (9-0, 1-0), Desko said there would be a battle at the faceoff X because both offenses thrive with the ball. But on Thursday, Syracuse struggled. Desko pulled Phaup early in the second quarter, replacing the usual starter with Varello.
“Jakob was getting beat cleanly, and Danny’s a slightly different technique. It’s always been a nice 1-2 punch for us in the past,” Desko said.
But Varello struggled, too. A false start on his first faceoff proved costly, marking SU’s third violation of the first half, a frame where Duke scored 10 of its 12 goals immediately after winning a faceoff.
“A couple times we saw their guy move early and thought the call went the wrong way a couple times,” Desko said.
Naso won 15 of his first 16 faceoffs, and though the Orange trailed by just five goals heading into halftime, they adjusted their offense to adapt to the unfamiliar.
“There were times where I think we needed to use a little bit more of our shot clock when we had the ball on offense, when we’re not getting the draws, we’re not getting the possessions because we played so much defense — especially in the first half,” Desko said.
Syracuse struck at the end of the first half when Varello won a faceoff after scooping up a ground ball near his foot and outrunning Naso. He found Chase Scanlan behind the cage, who fed Brendan Curry for a diving goal.
But on numerous occasions Thursday, it looked like Varello might escape the faceoff X and feed the ball to Syracuse’s offense before Duke forced a turnover. Midway through the second quarter, after having lost all but one faceoff — which was due to a violation called on Naso — Varello seemed to have escaped with the ball. Long stick midfielder Tyler Carpenter chased Varello down, jarring the ball loose, scooping it up and taking off in the other direction for a Nakeie Montgomery shot that Drake Porter saved.
Syracuse had similar issues with Phaup in the first quarter. An early faceoff turned into a ground ball that rolled into Duke’s half of the field. Phaup went for it, but Naso was there first.
“He’s really quick, and he was getting down on the ball,” Desko said of Duke’s faceoff specialist.
Phaup dove for a loose ball at the start of the second quarter, too, but Naso dove further and reacted sooner. Carpenter was there to clean up the ground ball. He charged downfield, outrunning Dearth for the rare long-pole goal. Phaup lost one more faceoff against Naso and was benched for the remainder of the night.
His 1-of-11 performance was the worst of his career since his Syracuse debut, where he went 1-of-7, also against Duke.
Up four goals as part of what’d eventually become a 7-0 run in the second quarter, Naso lined up against Varello. The ball spurted out toward Syracuse’s cage, and Naso was there first to scoop it up.
The Duke freshman took off downfield, sprinting past Dami Oladunmoye and Brett Barlow all the way to the cage. Naso fired, scored and celebrated. All Varello could do was watch and walk back to the faceoff X.
Published on March 26, 2021 at 12:04 am
Contact Roshan: [email protected] | @Roshan_f16
90,000 “There was a wild desire to chop off his ankles.” Khabibulin – about a beautiful conceded puck and Svechnikov’s lacrosse goals
The coach of the Russian national team goalkeepers Nikolai Khabibulin recalled the quarterfinal match at the 2002 Olympic Games with the Czech Republic (1: 0) and named the most beautiful conceded goal.
– What pictures from that game come up in front of your eyes in the first place?
Nikolai Khabibulin: Probably two. One, when we played three of us against five, Robert Lang was at the far post, he was throwing, and I was trying to catch in the fall and, in my opinion, even caught.And the second picture: a throw-in at our goal in the last seconds. Darius Kasparaitis stood behind me, insured. In fact, they spread there in order to preserve the victory.
– Is the quarterfinal with the Czechs at the 2002 Olympic Games the most important match of your career?
– Put him in the top 3. Another one I remember when in 1996 we played against Detroit with the Russian five. This was my last season at Winnipeg. We were losing a streak 1: 3, it was the fifth game in Detroit. We were all written off.And we arrived and won 3: 1. Although we were thrown over the throws, as I remember now, at 19:52. I remember that after this match we returned home at three in the morning, and at the airport we were met by a huge crowd of fans in white, it was very touching. And I would also highlight the seventh, winning game in the Stanley Cup final for Tampa. There was little work then, but the very significance of the match. However, in the end, when the score was 2: 1, I had to come into play. Then he played that moment more than once, thinking, what if he hadn’t saved it. Of course, you try to drive these thoughts away, but they come by themselves.
– The most beautiful goal you conceded? It happens that the goalkeeper misses and applauds …
– I remember playing once with Minnesota. You know, sometimes during shootouts some players spin 360 degrees and throw. And then the player of that team did the same in the game. In a game, this is much more difficult to pull off than in a shootout when no one is chasing you. True, I did not applaud him, but there was a wild desire to chop off his ankles.
– This season, our Andrey Svechnikov scored twice, bringing the puck on the stick from outside the goal.What if you were at the gate?
– I can only say for myself: it would have pissed me off. It’s one thing if Jaromir Jagr scores like this to me, who has played since he was 10-15 years old. But if you are a veteran, and a newcomer comes out and scores for you, and even in this way … Better not to drive past the gate then, – said the hockey player in an interview with a source.
Khabibulin is the 1992 Olympic champion and the bronze winner of the 2002 Games in Salt Lake City. In 2004, as part of Tampa, the goalkeeper became the first Russian goalkeeper to win the Stanley Cup.Khabibulin is the record holder for the number of matches in the regular NHL championships among the goalkeepers of the post-Soviet space – 799.
90,000 lacrosse, player, throw-in, team sport, team, sport, play, field, loose, fall, athletics
lacrosse, player, throw-in, team sport, team, sport, play, field, loose, fall, athletics | Pikist
lacrosse, player, throw-in, team sport, team, sport, game, field, loose, fall, athleticsPublic Domain
Related royalty free photos
lacrosse, player, team sport, team, sport, game, field, loose, fall, athletics, athlete
Public Domainsoccer, sports, soccer, players, team, team sports, soccer team, play, action, outdoors
Public Domainvolleyball, sport, ball, volley, sports ball games, team sport, competition, professional development, player, train, hall
Public Domainlacrosse, goalkeeper, tender target, athlete, sport, uniform, loose, keeper, man, person, athletic
Public Domainbaseball team, prayer, kneeling, before the game, athletics, players, grass, american, team, sport, spikes
Public Domainlacrosse, player, team sport, team, sport, game, field, loose, fall, athletics, athlete
Public Domainathletes, american football, players, team, ball, field, football, soccer players, game, grass, helmets
Public Domainlacrosse, player, running, team sport, team, sport, game, field, loose, fall, athletics
Public Domainyouth, soccer, game, football, young, play, team, ball, field, player, sport
Public Domainvolleyball, sport, ball, volley, sports ball games, team sport, competition, professional development, player, train, hall
Public Domainaction, adult, Paralympics, prosthetic, athlete, champion, competition, disability, disabled, effort, fast
Public Domainvolleyball, womens, sports, competition, court, players, teams, net, ball, athletes, athletics
Public Domainsoccer, soccer, soccer players, kick, kicking, soccer ball, game, competition, action, youth, boys
Public Domainfootball, american football, college, Alabama, players, stadium, sport, game, team, grass, athlete
Public Domainbaseball, runner, action, player, athlete, running, game, field, sport, base, ball game
Public Domainbaseball, replacement, bench, hands, gloves, field, sport, softball, pitch slow motion, recreation, game
Public Domainsoccer, ball, soccer, players, game, sport, match, shoot, soccer ball, shot, teams
Public Domainlacrosse, loose, game lacrosse, game, athletes, lacrosse players, stick, network, sport, competition, field
Public Domainteam, team sports, sport, team spirit, sporty, girl, boys, gym, gymnastics, exercise, school sports
Public Domainabout basketball team, huddle, basketball players, before the game, uniforms, game, sports, american, athlete, performance, group
Public Domainfootball, american, game, runner, ball, on the way back, ball holder, landing, stadium, sport, team
Public Domainsoftball, player, girl, bat, uniform, teenager, female, athlete, field, sport
Public Domainlacrosse, loose, player, sport, stick, competition, game, athlete, helmet, action, uniform
Public Domainbasketball, game, sports, competition, athletics, ball, players, teams, court, achievements
Public Domainsports, athletics, hurdle sprint athlete, people
Public Domainfootball, team, people, game, crowd of people, sport, american, wineskin, american football, event, stadium
Public Domainteam, grass, cheers, field, game, sport, young, happy, fun, soccer, play
Public Domainstretching, sporty, woman, athlete, fitness, sport, healthy, exercise, workout, young, female
Public Domainbasketball, jump, shot, man, college, game, competition, team, ball, athlete, court
Public DomainGoal, football, soccer field, ball, grass, adidas, play, sport, team, team sports
Public Domainpokemon, go, volleyball, poke, ball, player, coach, nintendo, gameboy, sports, fitness
Public Domainrace, athletics, running, sport, sprint, olympic games, false start, run, runners, competition, athletes
Public DomainHome plate, baseball, sport, home, plate, game, field, ball, team, dirt, athletics
Public Domainice hockey, puck, players, game, pass, forward, contact, sticks, goal, athlete, competition
Public Domainbasketball, basketball girls, female, teenager, athlete, player, youth, person, holding, ball, sport
Public Domainsoftball, action, hammer, female, bat, ball, competition, game, little, player, outdoors
Public Domainrugby, rugby sport, rugby player, thumbs up, see you, team, team sport, player, team member
Public Domainsoccer, player, girl, soccer, sport, game, field, competition, young, athlete, female
Public Domaingolf, golfer, tee, golf clubs, sport, action, sports ball games, bunker, sand, pretty, attractive
Public Domainfootball, american football, on the way back, tackle, horizontal, wineskin, clash, competition, game, sport, play
Public Domainbaseball field, game, baseball, field, sport, diamond, play, stadium, pitcher, hammer, recreation
Public Domainfootball, player, ball holder, recipient, running, american, field, sport, ball, soccer player, game
Public Domainfootball, ball, sport, soccer, play, green, field, kick, grass, foot, player
Public Domainaction, basketball, ball, athlete, cover, court, fun, game, jacket, leisure, person
Public Domainsport, jump, long jump, games, sporty, athletics, effort, woman, women, competition, stadion
Public Domaincontact sport, mesh, rubber ball, lacrosse ball, lacrosse, player, team sport, team, sport, game, field
Public Domainlacrosse, player, sport, stick, athlete, college, team, ball, equipment, helmet, field
Public Domainaction, adult, athlete, athletes, concrete floor, exercise, field, fun, game, health, jogging
Public Domainbaseball player, pals, in the field, sport, play, glove, infielder, field, ground ball, action, college
Public Domainice hockey, goal, sport, team, helmet, game, sticks, action, goal, celebration, competition
Public Domainvolleyball, sport, team sport, sports ball games, volley, sports, sand, team, beach volleyball, beach volleyball, ball
Public Domainlacrosse, player, attack, stick, sport, helmet, play, man, game, gloves, team
Public Domainamerican football, professional, nfl, action, on the way back, tackle, defense, helmet, sport, game, athlete
Public Domainteam, team spirit, stadium, sport, children, football, editing, competition, person, group, athlete
Public Domainsport, soccer, athlete, player, soccer, game, action, competition, field, grass, activity
Public Domainsoccer, soccer, sport, ball, game, player, field, grass, competition, action, team
Public Domainbasketball, hoop, basket, Slam Dunk, ball, sport, game, net, play, shot, goal
Public Domainlacrosse, air force, Ohio, game, sport, sports, network, players, competition, close up, action
Public Domainsoccer, runner, wrestling, sports, american runner, tackle, on the way back, ball holder, run, landing, game
Public Domainbasketball, basketball player, basketball girls, man, young, game, athlete, ball, sport, player, competition
Public Domain
Load more
90,000 Nashville forward Forsberg scored a lacrosse goal against Edmonton
https: // rsport.ria.ru/20200115/1563428023.html
Nashville forward Forsberg scored lacrosse goal against Edmonton
Nashville forward Forsberg scored lacrosse goal against Edmonton – RIA Novosti Sport, 15.01. 2020
Nashville forward Forsberg scores lacrosse goal against Edmonton
Nashville Predators forward Philip Forsberg scores a lacrosse goal against the Edmonton Oilers in the NHL regular season. RIA Novosti Sport, 15.01.2020
2020-01-15T09: 14
2020-01-15T09: 14
2020-01-15T11: 41
hockey
National Hockey League (NHL)
Nashville Predators
Edmonton Oilers
Philip Forsberg
/ html / head / meta [@ name = ‘og: title’] / @ content
/ html / head / meta [@ name = ‘og: description’] / @ content
https: // cdnn21.img.ria.ru/images/156342/79/1563427967_0:2560:1440_1920x0_80_0_0_8fe8812e3af45d55a3d5e9c65e043f78.jpg
MOSCOW, January 15 – RIA Novosti. Nashville Predators striker Philip Forsberg scored a lacrosse goal against the Edmonton Oilers in the NHL regular season after Nashville was 2-4 away from Edmonton on Tuesday. In the 11th minute of the first period, Forsberg, after a throw-in, grabbed the puck and, leaving from behind the gate, lifted it on the “hook” of the stick and threw it to the Oilers goalkeeper Mike Smith by the collar.Earlier this season, two of the same lacrosse goals were scored by Russian forward of the Carolina Hurricanes Andrei Svechnikov.
RIA Novosti Sport
7 495 645-6601
FSUE MIA “Russia Today”
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards/
2020
RIA Novosti Sport
7 495 645-6601
FSUE MIA “Russia Today”
https: // xn – c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn – p1ai / awards /
News
ru-RU
https://rsport.ria.ru/docs/about/copyright.html
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/
RIA Novosti Sport
7 495 645-6601
FSUE MIA “Russia Today”
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards/
https: //cdnn21.img.ria.ru/images/156342/79/1563427967_0-0:2560:1920_1920x0_80_0_0_98b54a49deb4cc140c1ac538ab935495.jpg
RIA Novosti Sport
7 495 645-6601
FSUE MIA “Russia Today”
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards/
RIA News Sports
7 495 645-6601
FSUE MIA Rossiya Segodnya
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards/
National Hockey League ( NHL), Nashville Predators, Edmonton Oilers, Philip Forsberg
| English | Russian | ||||||
| face mask | 908702 VZ mask wash | poke a glove in the opponent’s face ( VLZ_58 ) | |||||
| face -off | throw-in | ||||||
| face -off | at the beginning of each period or after stopping the game carmen-passenger ) | ||||||
| face -off circle | face-off circle ( jagr6880 ) | ||||||
| face -off leader | face-off specialist | ||||||
| face -off specialist | A scorer for 19 seasons with Buffalo, Toronto, New Jersey, Boston and Colorado, Andreychuk signed with the Lightning as a free agent in July 2001 and accepted a role as a checking forward and faceoff specialist to fit into Tortorella’s plans. VLZ_58 ) | ||||||
| face -off spot | throw-in point ( Yanick ) | ||||||
| face -off win | -off win | 9070 902-pucking 9025 | face -off win | hitting puck success ( carmen-passenger ) | |||
| face -off face win | hitting puck on throw-in ( carmen-90 90 passenger2702)| Seizing the initiative on a throw-in (So the basic definition of a faceoff win would be a play in which the players team gains possession of the puck.- https://bit.ly/2lORWDF carmen-passenger ) | face -offs lost | number of lost face-offs ( Alexey Lebedev ) | face won -off won faceoffs ( Alexey Lebedev ) | win a face -off | win faceoff (A face-off is the method used to begin and restart play after goals in some sports using sticks, primarily ice hockey, bandy and lacrosse. carmen-passenger ) | |
The level of the Eurotour is definitely not higher than the KHL. Results of the Karjala Cup for the Russian national team | Sport
The reaction of the sports media about the results of the Eurotour stage
Only one positive impression
“One victory from Finland was taken by the Russian national team (main, youth or Olympic – it is still not clear). If they did not manage to cope with the top composition of Finland and the mediocre Sweden, they still managed to beat the Czech reserve.True, there is not so much positive from this result – nevertheless, Dmitry Shugaev had to work at the goal no less than at Severstal, and the new leaders of the KHL were not particularly impressed. The same Rashevsky clearly suffered without the patronage of a dispatcher at the level of Shipachev, and Tertyshny was not particularly impressed either. But there is no tragedy in this – this is the first experience for young forwards, which will only benefit them. It is sad that there was neither a game (even against the Czechs), nor any separate strong components. We lost face-offs over and over again, and often in the most crucial situations.In unequal compositions, problems also regularly arose.
1: 0! They delivered a shell to Yelesin to the right throw-in circle, from there he unloaded his cannon, swinging from behind his head. See for yourself, enjoy: # CZERUS #samielesinpic.twitter.com / WTPaMsMqKt
– Hockey of Russia (@russiahockey) November 14, 2021
As a result, almost the only positive moment is Matvey Michkov. Despite the fact that initially his invitation was rather skeptical. As a result, Matvey broke not one Ovechkin’s record, as expected, but two at once.Michkov became not only the youngest debutant, but also the youngest author of the puck. Moreover, the 16-year-old junior managed to stick a lacrosse goal at the national team level, ”said the author of“ Sports Day by Day ” Anton Kudinov about the performance of the Russian national team.
Michkov’s “Lacrosse” and a weak minority
“The main factor that led Russia to defeat from the Finns is constant removal. The game in the minority, to put it mildly, failed – they were allowed to come too close to their goal, for which they paid.Galimov and Zinchenko have a lot of penalty minutes – however, they were corrected by effective actions. The Czech Republic was also allowed to pass in the minority. But with the majority, things went on the mend: after unsuccessful rallies against the Swedes and the Finns, there were two goals in the first period with the Czechs. Against the weaker team, the Russian special brigades felt confident – already some kind of progress, but progress.
Russia – Czech Republic
Third place in the Karjala Cup – in general, the result is so-so, but taking into account the experimental composition, it will come down.Now the Russian youth team will meet with its full complement to take revenge in Edmonton. Well, older guys have to wait for new challenges ”, – pointed out the strengths and weaknesses of the Russians by the correspondent of Sportbox Sergey Kulagin .
Russia finished the Karjala Cup with a victory over the Czech Republic
“Against Tre Krunur, our players played disciplinedly, grabbing only one minor penalty. With the Finns, the Russians spent 17 minutes in the penalty box, and this is not counting the “twenty” striker Ivan Zinchenko for a deliberate blow to the head.Alas, the Swedes were given goals relatively easily, and ours did not use all the chances. This is how the acting head coach of the Russian national team Sergey Zubov explained the defeat 2: 4. Goalkeeper Yaroslav Askarov has a minimum of claims – all the goals were scored from a patch. Although he did not control all the rebounds. Galimov noted the progress in the game of ours, it only remained to convert the positive into a victory over the Czech Republic. Unfortunately, the team did not manage to present the “biscuit” to Shugaev. Voronkov put the stick under the skates of the opponent behind the other’s gates, sat down in the penalty box, and the Czechs soaked the score.
??? pic.twitter.com/nKpWZyUePQ
– Hockey of Russia (@russiahockey) November 13, 2021
The third period can be called the theater of one actor – Shugaev. Our goalkeeper came under carpet bombardment, but capitulated only once, keeping the Russian team victorious, “- summed up the results of the Russian team’s performance by the author of” Soviet Sport “ Vladislav Domrachev .
The coaching crisis continues
“Oleg Bratash would not have dropped out, I think the impression from the work of the bench would have been better – after all, he is an experienced and in his own way a good coach.But the appearance of Zubov proved that we have some kind of problem with the coaches. In the game with the Czechs, we played some segment of four – because the coaches did not release the required player. At some point, we were left with three defenders – because the coaches did not make a change.
Russian national team
About the style of play and thought I have already said: even today’s victory over the Czechs still left the feeling that it was a swim in the waves of the guys’ mood, and that the coaches did not control about anything.If the game is on, it’s good; if it’s not, it’s bad. In the third period, the Czechs flew and our team was left alone with this fact, and it does not seem that the coaches had any ideas. Withstood – and great.
2: 0! Captain Dima closes Khusnutdinov’s transmission by rail. Closes – from the word lock! Voronkov! # CZERUS #samiRussiapic.twitter.com / 8GEz7DtbZT
– Hockey of Russia (@russiahockey) November 14, 2021
You can forget this tournament and prepare for the next one, where we will have a different lineup of players, different coaches and in general everything will be different.Preparations are underway – I don’t even understand why, ”says Sports.ru.
Contradictory impression from the last match at the Karjala Cup
“The defeats of the Russian national team in the two opening matches of the Karjala Cup against Finland (0: 3) and Sweden (2: 4) were sensitive – our team did not do much. And the only positive moment was a lacrosse goal from 16-year-old striker Matvey Michkov: he became the youngest scorer in an official match of the national team.
Russia – Czech Republic
The coaching staff of the national team finally abandoned the idea of playing combinations for the youth world championship. In every attacking troika for the match against the Czech Republic there was a player who was not suitable for the youth team in terms of age. Michkov, for example, was left in the top three with Vovchenko and Galimov. And Khusnutdinov, who plays on the flank in SKA, came out in the center of the first link with Voronkov and Rashevsky.
We found out, found out who is the author of the goal. At first they recorded Michkov, but then Voronkov was nevertheless made the author – it was he who pushed this unsecured puck into the goal.
This is 0: 3 in the match with the Czechs – in any case! # CZERUSpic.twitter.com / Llq5OHAELG– Ice Hockey Club SKA (@hcSKA) November 14, 2021
It seemed that with the score 4: 0, the Russian team would calmly bring matters to the first victory in the Eurotour. But after the fourth missed puck, the Czechs perked up. We won back one goal at the end of the second period, and in the third period they could even equalize the score. Thanks to Dmitry Shugaev – the Severstal goalkeeper saved our team several times. It is he who can be called the best player of the team at this stage: there is nothing to reproach Shugaev with in the match lost to the Finns.But I wanted to see a high-level game from the whole team. We enjoyed it only for two periods, ”wrote the journalist of“ Sport-Express ” Artur Khairullin in his article.
There is a first victory in the Olympic season
“The first two matches at the Karjala Cup were unsuccessful for the Russian team. First, defeat by the Finns and a weak minority, then a more interesting match with the Swedes. Also lost, but remembered for the luxurious lacrosse goal of 16-year-old Matvey Michkov.Perhaps this was the most positive moment for both meetings. As a result, Sergei Zubov is in charge of the national team, as Oleg Znarok fell ill and did not even fly to Helsinki, and Oleg Bratash left the location of the national team for family reasons.
