Division 3 men’s lacrosse. Division III Men’s Lacrosse: Comprehensive Guide to DIII College Conferences and Teams

How are Division III men’s lacrosse conferences structured. What are the top-performing teams in DIII lacrosse. Which conferences are considered the most competitive in DIII lacrosse. How many teams compete in DIII men’s lacrosse.

The Landscape of Division III Men’s Lacrosse

Division III men’s lacrosse represents a vibrant and competitive tier of collegiate lacrosse in the United States. With numerous conferences and teams spread across the country, DIII lacrosse offers student-athletes the opportunity to compete at a high level while maintaining a balance between academics and athletics.

The structure of DIII men’s lacrosse is intricate, with multiple conferences housing teams of varying skill levels and geographic locations. Understanding this landscape is crucial for fans, prospective students, and anyone interested in the sport.

Key Characteristics of DIII Men’s Lacrosse

• No athletic scholarships offered
• Focus on academic and athletic balance
• Shorter playing seasons compared to DI and DII
• Emphasis on regional competition
• Greater number of participating institutions

Major Conferences in DIII Men’s Lacrosse

DIII men’s lacrosse is organized into several conferences, each with its own set of teams and competitive dynamics. Some of the notable conferences include:

1. Centennial Conference
2. New England Small College Athletic Conference (NESCAC)
3. Empire 8
4. Commonwealth Coast Conference (CCC)
5. North Coast Athletic Conference (NCAC)
6. Old Dominion Athletic Conference (ODAC)
7. Landmark Conference

These conferences represent just a fraction of the total number of DIII lacrosse leagues. Each conference has its own history, rivalries, and standout programs that contribute to the rich tapestry of DIII lacrosse.

Conference Spotlight: Centennial Conference

The Centennial Conference is home to some of the most competitive DIII lacrosse programs. In the provided data, we can see strong performances from teams such as:

• Dickinson (17-3 overall, 9-1 in conference)
• Swarthmore (14-4 overall, 8-2 in conference)
• Gettysburg (13-5 overall, 6-3 in conference)

These records demonstrate the high level of play within the Centennial Conference, making it one of the premier DIII lacrosse leagues in the country.

Powerhouse Programs in DIII Men’s Lacrosse

Several DIII lacrosse programs have established themselves as perennial contenders. Based on the information provided, some standout teams include:

• Salisbury (23-1 overall, 5-0 in conference)
• Tufts (22-1 overall, 13-0 in conference)
• RIT (20-2 overall, 8-0 in conference)
• Washington and Lee (18-5 overall, 9-2 in conference)

These programs consistently demonstrate excellence on the field, often competing for conference titles and national championships.

What makes these programs successful?

The success of top DIII lacrosse programs can be attributed to several factors:

• Strong coaching staff and player development
• Consistent recruitment of talented student-athletes
• Well-established team culture and traditions
• Support from the institution and local community
• Competitive conference play that prepares teams for postseason success

Emerging Teams and Conferences in DIII Lacrosse

While some programs have long-standing traditions of success, DIII lacrosse is also characterized by emerging teams and conferences that are making their mark on the national stage. Some examples from the provided data include:

• Illinois Wesleyan (15-4 overall, 8-0 in conference)
• Aurora (15-5 overall, 10-0 in conference)
• Baldwin Wallace (16-3 overall, 10-1 in conference)

These teams demonstrate that DIII lacrosse is a dynamic landscape where new powerhouses can emerge and challenge established programs.

Factors Contributing to Program Growth

Several factors can contribute to the rise of emerging programs in DIII lacrosse:

• Increased investment in facilities and resources
• Hiring of experienced coaching staff
• Growing popularity of lacrosse in different regions
• Success in recruiting talented players from diverse backgrounds
• Development of strong conference competition

The Role of Conference Play in DIII Lacrosse

Conference play is a crucial aspect of DIII men’s lacrosse, often determining postseason berths and seeding. The importance of conference performance is evident in the records provided, where teams with strong conference records often have successful overall seasons.

Conference Play Dynamics

Conference play in DIII lacrosse is characterized by:

• Intense rivalries between geographically close institutions
• Balanced schedules that pit top teams against each other
• Opportunities for upset victories that can reshape conference standings
• End-of-season conference tournaments that determine automatic bids to the NCAA tournament

The competitive nature of conference play helps prepare teams for the rigors of postseason competition and contributes to the overall quality of DIII lacrosse.

Geographic Distribution of DIII Lacrosse Programs

DIII men’s lacrosse programs are spread across various regions of the United States, with concentrations in certain areas known for their lacrosse traditions. The geographic distribution of programs influences conference alignment and regional rivalries.

Regional Hotspots for DIII Lacrosse

Some regions with a high concentration of DIII lacrosse programs include:

• Northeast (New England, New York, Pennsylvania)
• Mid-Atlantic (Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina)
• Midwest (Ohio, Illinois, Michigan)
• Growing presence in the South and West

This distribution reflects both the historical roots of lacrosse and its expanding popularity across the country.

Challenges and Opportunities in DIII Men’s Lacrosse

While DIII men’s lacrosse offers a competitive and rewarding experience for student-athletes, it also faces unique challenges and opportunities:

Challenges

• Limited resources compared to DI and DII programs
• Balancing academic demands with athletic commitments
• Recruiting challenges for programs in less lacrosse-saturated regions
• Maintaining competitive balance across a large number of programs

Opportunities

• Growing the sport in new regions and demographics
• Fostering a true student-athlete experience
• Developing innovative approaches to program management and player development
• Creating meaningful rivalries and traditions within conferences

These challenges and opportunities shape the landscape of DIII men’s lacrosse and contribute to its unique character within collegiate athletics.

The Future of DIII Men’s Lacrosse

As DIII men’s lacrosse continues to evolve, several trends and potential developments are worth considering:

• Expansion of programs into new geographic areas
• Increasing parity among conferences and teams
• Adoption of new technologies for training and game analysis
• Growing media coverage and fan engagement
• Potential realignment of conferences to optimize competition and travel

These factors will likely shape the future of DIII men’s lacrosse, influencing everything from recruiting to on-field strategies and program development.

Emerging Trends in DIII Lacrosse

Some emerging trends in DIII men’s lacrosse include:

• Increased focus on player safety and injury prevention
• Growing emphasis on diversity and inclusion initiatives
• Development of year-round training programs within NCAA guidelines
• Expansion of international recruitment efforts
• Integration of analytics and data-driven decision making in coaching and player development

These trends reflect the ongoing evolution of the sport and the commitment of DIII programs to providing a high-quality experience for student-athletes.

In conclusion, Division III men’s lacrosse represents a vibrant and competitive landscape within collegiate athletics. With its focus on balancing academic and athletic pursuits, DIII lacrosse offers a unique experience for student-athletes and fans alike. As the sport continues to grow and evolve, DIII programs will play a crucial role in shaping the future of lacrosse at the collegiate level.

College Lacrosse Conferences | D3

1

alfred state

(0-0)

(0-0)

1

cabrini

(14-5)

(8-0)

2

marymount

(9-10)

(6-3)

3

gwynedd-mercy

(7-9)

(5-2)

4

wesley

(0-0)

(0-0)

5

immaculata

(10-8)

(3-5)

6

marywood

(6-10)

(2-5)

7

neumann

(6-11)

(2-5)

8

centenary

(0-15)

(0-6)

1

dickinson

(17-3)

(9-1)

2

swarthmore

(14-4)

(8-2)

3

gettysburg

(13-5)

(6-3)

4

muhlenberg

(11-6)

(5-4)

5

franklin and marshall

(9-8)

(5-5)

6

haverford

(5-10)

(3-5)

7

washington college

(8-9)

(2-6)

8

ursinus

(7-8)

(2-6)

9

McDaniel

(7-10)

(0-8)

1

salisbury

(23-1)

(5-0)

2

christopher newport

(18-3)

(2-3)

3

stockton

(12-6)

(1-2)

4

mary washington

(6-11)

(0-3)

1

western new england

(12-9)

(10-1)

2

endicott

(13-5)

(9-1)

3

salve regina

(11-7)

(7-3)

4

roger williams

(9-7)

(5-4)

5

nichols

(11-8)

(5-5)

6

curry

(5-11)

(2-6)

7

univ of new england

(8-10)

(2-7)

8

wentworth tech

(5-11)

(2-7)

9

gordon

(3-12)

(0-8)

1

illinois wesleyan

(15-4)

(8-0)

2

North Central College

(10-6)

(5-2)

3

transylvania

(6-11)

(5-3)

4

carroll

(0-0)

(0-0)

5

carthage

(11-6)

(3-4)

6

Elmhurst

(10-5)

(2-4)

7

augustana

(6-10)

(1-5)

8

Carroll (Wisc. )

(3-14)

(0-6)

1

rosemont

(6-9)

(6-0)

2

cairn

(6-7)

(4-2)

3

montclair state

(10-8)

(1-0)

4

kean

(11-7)

(0-1)

5

bryn athyn

(4-6)

(2-4)

6

keystone

(0-13)

(0-6)

1

saint john fisher

(10-10)

(8-0)

2

alfred

(11-5)

(5-2)

3

nazareth

(10-9)

(5-3)

4

elmira

(0-0)

(0-0)

5

Houghton

(0-0)

(0-0)

6

hartwick

(6-6)

(3-4)

7

utica college

(7-10)

(2-4)

8

sage

(6-11)

(1-5)

9

keuka

(6-7)

(0-6)

1

emmanuel

(16-6)

(12-1)

2

lasell

(11-7)

(9-3)

3

rivier

(12-4)

(8-3)

4

saint joseph’s (me)

(10-8)

(8-3)

5

univ. of saint joseph

(11-9)

(7-6)

6

dean

(10-6)

(6-6)

7

mount ida

(0-0)

(0-0)

8

johnson and wales

(10-7)

(5-6)

9

norwich

(6-12)

(4-7)

10

albertus magnus

(8-8)

(2-8)

11

anna maria

(2-15)

(1-9)

12

regis

(3-11)

(0-10)

1

colorado college

(8-6)

(4-0)

2

anderson

(7-5)

(5-2)

3

hanover

(7-8)

(5-2)

4

southwestern

(9-9)

(4-2)

5

dallas

(0-0)

(0-0)

6

earlham

(4-8)

(2-3)

7

mount st joseph

(2-11)

(2-4)

8

centenary college (la)

(2-10)

(2-5)

9

lindenwood

(0-14)

(0-6)

1

elizabethtown

(12-5)

(8-1)

2

scranton

(14-6)

(8-1)

3

catholic

(6-10)

(5-3)

4

susquehanna

(10-8)

(4-4)

5

moravian

(7-8)

(3-4)

6

goucher

(5-11)

(2-5)

7

drew

(6-10)

(1-6)

8

Juniata

(3-13)

(0-7)

1

rit

(20-2)

(8-0)

2

rpi

(9-7)

(6-2)

3

union

(12-6)

(5-3)

4

bard

(0-0)

(0-0)

5

saint lawrence

(12-6)

(4-5)

6

skidmore

(10-6)

(3-4)

7

clarkson

(11-5)

(3-5)

8

ithaca

(7-8)

(2-5)

9

vassar

(7-9)

(0-7)

1

western connecticut

(16-5)

(9-1)

2

plymouth state

(14-4)

(7-3)

3

umass-boston

(12-7)

(7-3)

4

keene state

(9-7)

(7-3)

5

mass maritime

(8-7)

(5-4)

6

umass-dartmouth

(0-0)

(0-0)

7

eastern connecticut

(6-11)

(3-6)

8

southern maine

(4-12)

(2-6)

9

castleton state

(4-13)

(1-7)

10

salem state

(1-16)

(0-8)

1

york

(15-6)

(10-0)

2

stevenson

(11-8)

(8-2)

3

eastern

(9-9)

(6-3)

4

widener

(9-9)

(6-4)

5

messiah

(11-7)

(4-5)

6

hood

(9-7)

(3-5)

7

lebanon valley

(8-9)

(2-6)

8

albright

(3-14)

(1-7)

9

alvernia

(4-12)

(0-8)

1

stevens tech

(18-3)

(10-0)

2

desales

(10-8)

(8-2)

3

arcadia

(7-10)

(6-3)

4

misericordia

(10-9)

(6-4)

5

lycoming

(6-11)

(3-5)

6

fdu-florham

(7-11)

(3-6)

7

delaware valley

(6-11)

(2-6)

8

Wilkes

(4-13)

(2-6)

9

king’s college

(0-15)

(0-8)

1

albion

(14-5)

(7-1)

2

hope

(13-6)

(7-1)

3

adrian

(9-8)

(4-3)

4

olivet

(0-0)

(0-0)

5

Kalamazoo

(7-8)

(3-4)

6

calvin

(7-10)

(2-4)

7

trine

(8-5)

(1-5)

8

Alma

(1-11)

(0-6)

1

lake forest

(13-5)

(7-0)

2

dubuque

(10-8)

(5-2)

3

Northland

(5-8)

(3-3)

4

fontbonne

(0-0)

(0-0)

5

north central univ. (mn)

(0-0)

(0-0)

6

cornell college

(5-11)

(2-4)

7

northwestern (mn)

(3-9)

(2-5)

8

monmouth illinois

(1-11)

(0-5)

1

saint mary’s (md)

(15-6)

(7-0)

2

morrisville

(8-5)

(4-2)

3

penn college

(11-7)

(3-3)

4

medaille

(2-12)

(1-1)

5

hilbert

(3-9)

(3-4)

6

wells

(1-8)

(1-3)

7

la roche

(0-12)

(0-6)

1

tufts

(22-1)

(13-0)

2

middlebury

(18-3)

(11-2)

3

amherst

(12-6)

(7-5)

4

williams

(10-8)

(7-5)

5

bowdoin

(11-5)

(6-5)

6

trinity (ct)

(8-8)

(5-6)

7

wesleyan

(8-7)

(4-6)

8

hamilton

(7-8)

(4-7)

9

connecticut college

(6-8)

(4-7)

10

colby

(4-10)

(1-9)

11

bates

(1-12)

(0-10)

1

new england college

(6-13)

(5-0)

2

becker

(0-0)

(0-0)

3

newbury

(0-0)

(0-0)

4

eastern nazarene

(3-8)

(2-3)

5

mitchell

(0-14)

(0-4)

1

babson

(13-5)

(8-0)

2

springfield

(6-10)

(5-2)

3

mit

(12-6)

(5-3)

4

clark

(5-9)

(3-4)

5

coast guard

(6-9)

(3-5)

6

emerson

(5-12)

(1-5)

7

wheaton

(6-10)

(0-6)

1

maine maritime

(14-4)

(11-0)

2

suny poly

(10-5)

(8-2)

3

suny delhi

(8-8)

(7-3)

4

suny canton

(6-9)

(5-4)

5

husson

(9-8)

(5-5)

6

green mountain

(0-0)

(0-0)

7

johnson state

(0-0)

(0-0)

8

suny cobleskill

(8-5)

(3-5)

9

thomas

(4-8)

(3-5)

10

massachusetts cla

(6-9)

(2-7)

11

cazenovia

(0-7)

(0-6)

12

nvu-lyndon

(1-8)

(1-8)

1

denison

(17-4)

(9-1)

2

kenyon

(15-3)

(8-2)

3

ohio wesleyan

(12-5)

(7-2)

4

wooster

(13-4)

(5-4)

5

allegheny

(8-8)

(1-1)

6

wittenberg

(7-8)

(4-4)

7

oberlin

(8-8)

(4-5)

8

depauw

(7-9)

(2-6)

9

wabash

(7-8)

(1-7)

10

hiram

(5-12)

(0-9)

1

aurora

(15-5)

(10-0)

2

illinois tech

(10-6)

(7-3)

3

concordia

(11-6)

(6-3)

4

milwaukee engineering

(8-7)

(5-3)

5

Benedictine

(5-12)

(5-4)

6

edgewood

(6-10)

(3-5)

7

marian

(9-7)

(2-6)

8

Beloit

(2-12)

(1-7)

9

concordia-chicago

(0-14)

(0-8)

1

baldwin wallace

(16-3)

(10-1)

2

john carroll

(15-3)

(10-1)

3

capital

(13-5)

(8-3)

4

Ohio Northern

(12-6)

(7-4)

5

otterbein

(6-11)

(5-5)

6

muskingum

(7-9)

(3-6)

7

marietta

(5-10)

(3-6)

8

mount union

(6-11)

(3-7)

9

heidelberg

(4-11)

(1-8)

10

wilmington

(3-13)

(0-9)

1

washington and lee

(18-5)

(9-2)

2

lynchburg

(15-7)

(9-2)

3

hampden-sydney

(13-5)

(8-2)

4

randolph-macon

(12-6)

(7-3)

5

roanoke

(11-8)

(6-4)

6

bridgewater

(8-8)

(4-5)

7

shenandoah

(9-10)

(5-6)

8

guilford

(7-8)

(2-7)

9

virginia wesleyan

(6-10)

(2-7)

10

randolph

(2-14)

(1-7)

11

ferrum

(3-11)

(0-8)

1

grove city

(11-9)

(7-0)

2

saint vincent

(15-3)

(7-2)

3

westminster (PA)

(10-7)

(4-3)

4

washington and jefferson

(4-6)

(1-1)

5

chatham

(6-10)

(3-3)

6

thiel

(4-8)

(2-4)

7

franciscan

(6-7)

(1-5)

8

bethany

(5-10)

(0-7)

1

new york maritime

(13-6)

(8-1)

2

us merchant marine

(10-7)

(7-1)

3

farmingdale

(13-3)

(4-3)

4

manhattanville

(7-9)

(3-4)

5

mount st mary

(5-8)

(3-4)

6

st. joseph’s college (NY)

(1-5)

(1-3)

7

purchase

(6-10)

(2-5)

8

mount saint vincent

(4-11)

(0-7)

1

centre

(13-4)

(7-1)

2

sewanee

(11-5)

(6-2)

3

rhodes

(12-6)

(5-3)

4

birmingham southern

(10-7)

(5-3)

5

berry

(6-7)

(2-5)

6

hendrix

(6-11)

(1-6)

7

oglethorpe

(3-9)

(0-6)

1

jwu-denver

(0-0)

(0-0)

1

suny geneseo

(15-5)

(9-0)

2

suny cortland

(13-5)

(7-2)

3

oswego state

(7-6)

(5-3)

4

suny new paltz

(8-7)

(4-4)

5

oneonta state

(7-7)

(3-4)

6

brockport

(4-10)

(2-5)

7

potsdam state

(7-8)

(1-6)

8

plattsburgh

(2-13)

(0-7)

1

pfeiffer

(16-2)

(8-1)

2

southern virginia

(9-8)

(8-2)

3

piedmont

(11-6)

(7-2)

4

methodist

(6-10)

(6-5)

5

lagrange

(7-9)

(4-5)

6

william peace

(7-8)

(4-6)

7

greensboro

(4-10)

(2-4)

8

averett

(3-11)

(0-2)

9

huntingdon

(5-10)

(2-6)

10

brevard

(3-12)

(0-8)

NCAA Men’s Lacrosse Division II, III Championships: Merrimack, Cabrini win titles

PHILADELPHIA, P. A. — With the men’s Division I champion being crowned on Monday, it was the Division II and Division III teams that took the stage in front of 18,702 at Lincoln Financial Field on Sunday.

Division II National Championship

In their last game as a Division II program, the Merrimack Warriors completed a “poetic” run, as head coach Mike Morgan would call it, to their second straight Division II national championship with a 16-8 win over the Limestone Saints.

After Limestone tied the game at three early in the second quarter, the Warriors went on a 7-0 run to break the game up with a 10-3 lead under a minute into the third quarter.

The Saints made things interesting for the remainder of the quarter as they went on a 4-0 run to cut the Warrior lead to 10-7. But junior Charlie Bertrand, the Division II recipient of the Lt. Raymond J. Enners Outstanding Player of the Year and Lt. Col. JI Turnbull Outstanding Attackman of the Year awards, ended the Limestone run with two straight goals, including a behind-the-back tally. Merrimack scored four more times in the quarter to double up the Saints.

“The story of this team the whole year is just that we have been battling adversity,” Bertrand said. “We have gone through a lot of stuff that’s built us as a team, and when Limestone went on that run, we knew we had to just do the same thing we have been doing, stick to what makes us good, play as a team and play together, just like we did in the couple other NCAA games. If you go down a few goals, you just keep playing, you don’t want to go out of your role.”

The “poetic” national title run was a rough and tough one. The Warriors may have been lucky from the recent expansion of the Division II Tournament to 12 teams. Merrimack was the No. 6 and final seed in the North Region and had to face the top four teams in the latest USILA poll. The “Six Train” destroyed No. 3 seed Mercyhurst in the first round in their first ever matchup. The Warriors held off NE10 rival Adelphi, a team they lost to by nine in the regular season, by two goals before winning a wild thriller against fellow NE10 rival Le Moyne in overtime. Beating Limestone was revenge for the team’s 2017 national championship loss to the Saints.

“I said to the guys before, you guys are writing the story,” Morgan said. “This is the end, so you write it how you want it. They did. This season will go down as something special. Last year a lot of things broke our way last year, and not that it wasn’t sweet, but when you win by kind of what we won by last year, things broke your way, it’s the first time, so you’re excited but I felt like we earned this year, really earned this year.

“These guys didn’t quit from day one. We were tough on them, really tough on them, and I think they just kept plugging along, like these guys said, and here we are.”

The Warriors will become members of Division I and the Northeast Conference on July 1. At the end of the game, Christian Thomas didn’t fling the game ball up in the air. He gave it to Morgan as a symbol of their end in Division II. But despite the move, the program’s culture won’t change.

“We have always been built on hard work, selflessness, confidence,” Morgan said. “Our level is middle, middle high Division I already, so I don’t think we’re changing much in terms of the structure, but the quality and what made us good in DII will certainly be what make us good in DI.

“You have to have guys that are bought into what you’re doing, bought into loving the program, the school, and being hard working. That doesn’t change in Division I. You will see better competition. But for us it’s knowing you’ve got to work, you’ve got to grind. We got a team that just grinded their way all the way to a national championship as a sixth seed. On the road four times, if you count today as a road game.

“At the end of the day, we’ve been running this thing for the last eight or nine years with a Division I model, so for us, it’s taking the good qualities of DII but also knowing that there are some opportunities when we move to DI with the type of teams we will be playing and the publicity and whatnot. ”

MERRIMACK STATS

A Charlie Bertrand (4 Gs, 3 As, 3 GBs)
A Sean Black (2 Gs, 3 As, 1 GB)
M Dan Thomas (3 Gs, 1 A, 2 GBs)
A Christian Thomas (3 Gs, 1 A)
M Max Morrill (2 As, 1 GB)
M Michael O’Connell (1 G, 1 GB)
M Seamus Ford (1 G, 1 GB)
M Drew Hailey (1 G)
A Tyler Liantonio (1 G)

D Carlin Joyal (1 CT, 4 GBs)
D Nicholas Perez-Blanco (1 CT, 3 GBs)
D Alex Marceau (1 CT, 1 GB)
M Brennan McInnis (1 CT, 1 GB)

FOGO Davis Cronin (18-of-27 FOs, 11 GBs)
G Nick Ponte (12 saves, 2 GBs)

Postgame press conference from @MerrimackMLAX. https://t.co/EGAOe6JbsS

— College Crosse (@College_Crosse) May 26, 2019

LIMESTONE STATS

M Tyler Papa (2 Gs, 3 As)
A Larson Sundown (3 Gs)
A Brian Huyghue (2 Gs, 1 GB, 1 CT)
A Matt Bennett (1 G, 1 A, 3 GBs)
M Clark Walter (2 As, 1 GB)
M Jeremy Burns (2 As)

M Dylan Brown (1 CT, 1 GB)

FOGO Dakota Kirsch-Downs (7-of-17 FOs, 4 GBs)
FOGO Christopher Parrott (2-of-10 FOs, 1 GB)
G Danny Foren (16 saves, 2 GBs, 1 CT)

Postgame press conference from @LimestoneLax. https://t.co/P8vhAwfJdI

— College Crosse (@College_Crosse) May 26, 2019

Division III National Championship

In the battle of two first timers, the hometown Cabrini Cavaliers ended the day 1-0 for the 22nd time in 2019 as they defeated the Amherst Mammoths 16-12 for their first ever national championship. But Cabrini head coach Steve Colfer thought luck would be on their side on Saturday at the Division I semifinals.

“I didn’t realize the section when we went to the banquet on Friday night. They [staffers at the NCAA Tournament] said ‘okay after the Fanfest, you’re going to go in and your teams will be sitting in Section 108. That’s where we have reserved for the DIII teams to watch the DI game.’ And I go to my seat and I’m sitting there and I turn and I said, oh my God, I got a really eerie feeling right now, and they said why? One row in front, three seats down is the seat I sat in to watch the Eagles beat the Vikings to go to the Super Bowl in 2018.

“I had just told [Philadelphia Eagles center] Jason Kelce that out on the field. He is a big supporter of Cabrini lacrosse. His wife went to Cabrini and she worked in our athletic department for a number of years, and Kelce has been around our guys, spoken to the guys and is good friends with a bunch of guys on our team, and I told him that and he was laughing, and he said, that’s a pretty good omen, that’s a pretty good omen.”

The Cavaliers got off to a slow start. Amherst began the game with two goals before the teams would alternate tallies. But the Mammoths would end the alternating pattern with a two-goal run in under a minute from Matt Solberg and Jon Coffey before the Cavaliers scored three straight to tie the game at six heading into halftime.

Jackson Herrick gave Amherst the lead back to begin the third quarter. Cabrini would score two straight goals to give them their first lead of the day with 11:36 left in the third before Evan Wolf tied the game back up at eight. The teams would alternate goals once more, but the Cavaliers found an opening by scoring seven of the final 10 goals to take the win, including a three-goal run to begin the final quarter that began from Kyle Tucker, who was named the Most Outstanding Player. Timmy Brooks, who was cleared to fully play last night after suffering a broken collarbone, scored the eventual game-winning goal as well as another in the final quarter.

“It’s an unreal feeling,” Tucker said. “I didn’t have words to describe it when I was out on the field. All I could do is put my hands on my head and think about how unbelievable this experience is.”

It was the first time a school from the Philadelphia area as well as from the entire state of Pennsylvania won a national championship in men’s lacrosse.

“There are so many great coaches in this city at the high school level, at the college level, and at the youth level,” said Cabrini head coach Steve Colfer. “I grew up in West Chester and started playing youth lacrosse there and after college came back to this area and played in summer leagues and men’s leagues and got coaching at Cabrini and have been mentored by so many of these guys. And to be able to do something like that, it’s unreal. It’s a tribute to all those guys. I learn, I try to really work at this, and if someone is talking about lacrosse, I’m going to go listen.

“To see teams break through and to get to this championship weekend is huge, and then to ultimately get a national championship is huge. So if there’s anyone out there thinking, I don’t know if we’re doing it right, if we’re recruiting the right kids, I don’t know if I have the right support. You gotta be persistent. You gotta plant your flag somewhere in life and work hard around it, and I really believe if you do that the potential is there for you in your program. Hopefully all those guys in Philly own a little piece of this, because it’s special to do that. ”

So with Cabrini getting their championship, Colfer is putting pressure on Kelce to do the same.

“I told him as I’m walking out, ‘okay now the ball is back in your court. The Eagles have to go back and get us another Super Bowl next year.’ And he looked at me and laughed, but he didn’t say no.”

CABRINI STATS

A Jordan Krug (2 Gs, 3 As, 3 GBs)
A Kyle Tucker (3 Gs, 1 A, 1 GB)
A Bill Morgan (3 Gs)
M Tyler Kostack (2 Gs)
A Timmy Brooks (2 Gs)
M Mike Gerzabek (2 As)
LSM Kyle Myers (1 G, 4 GBs)
M Sean Wagner (1 G, 3 GBs, 3 CTs)
M Kevin Leyden (1 G, 1 GB)

D Tommy DeLuca (1 CT, 5 GBs)
D Kevin Delaney (1 CT, 1 GB)
SSDM Robert Cressman (1 CT, 4 GBs)

FOGO Luke McCallion (14-of-26 FOs, 4 GBs)
FOGO Jake Huey (2-of-4 FOs, 1 GB, 1 G)
G Riley White (11 saves, 2 GBs, 2 CTs)

Postgame press conference from @CabriniMLAX. https://t.co/hTWMCZC8D6

— College Crosse (@College_Crosse) May 26, 2019

AMHERST STATS

M Matt Solberg (2 Gs, 2 As)
A Evan Wolf (2 Gs, 1 A, 3 GBs)
M PJ Clementi (3 As)
A Jon Coffey (2 Gs, 5 GBs, 1 CT)
M Jackson Herrick (2 Gs, 2 GBs)
M Brogan Mahon (1 G, 1 A, 1 GB)
M Grant Chryssicas (2 As, 4 GBs, 1 CT)
A Colin Minicus (1 G, 3 GBs, 1 CT)
M Jack Norton (1 G, 1 GB)
A Dylan Peabody (1 G)

D Rod Castro (1 CT, 1 GB)
M Trenton Shore (1 CT, 1 GB)
LSM Luke Mallette (1 CT, 1 GB)
LSM James Crovatto (1 CT)

FOGO Dylan Finazzo (10-of-22 FOs, 3 GBs)
FOGO Juan Gonzalez (4-of-8 FOs)
G Gib Versfeld (9 saves, 2 GBs)

Postgame press conference from @AmherstLacrosse. https://t.co/NPXHY9X28V

— College Crosse (@College_Crosse) May 26, 2019

how to get – EducationUSA Russia

Student sports are a popular spectacle, a source of pride, a source of income and one of the factors of prestige for universities in the United States. It’s no surprise that more than a thousand American colleges and universities offer a variety of financial support options for talented athletes who play for college teams. In this article, we will talk about how to get a higher education in the USA for free with a sports scholarship, what sports have such opportunities, and how the admission process is built.

Higher education in the US is paid, but many universities are willing to partially or even fully compensate talented and/or needy students. One of such support tools is a sports scholarship.

Let’s make a reservation right away that less than 2% of high school athletes receive sports scholarships. However, the total allocated amount is rather big, more than $2. 7 billion per year. Sports scholarships can be obtained at more than 1,000 universities that are members of university sports associations. At the same time, many universities also offer other options for choosing financial assistance to promising applicants-athletes if they cannot provide them with a full sports scholarship.

Which universities can offer sports scholarships?

University sports associations supervise sports competitions between universities. They also determine the requirements for student athletes admitted to competitions, for sports scholarships and other types of financial support that universities can give to their student athletes.

College Athletic Associations:

1. The National College Athletic Association (NCAA) unites 1,100 universities and supports 24 sports.
2. The National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA) has 249 member organizations and supports 17 sports.
3. National Junior College Athletic Association (NJCAA) unites 525 community colleges, supports 16 sports.

Associations distinguish 3 divisions for each discipline. A university, a member of the Association, may be included in different divisions in different disciplines. The division into divisions depends on the budget allocated by the educational institution for this sport. On the website of each association, you can find information about which universities are included in them, in which disciplines and in which division.

Types of Athletic Scholarships

There are two types of Athletic Scholarships in the USA:

• A full-ride scholarship covers tuition fees, accommodation, food, training materials and sometimes medical insurance.
• Partial scholarship (partial scholarship) covers only the cost of training – in whole or in part.

Only Division I colleges and universities can pay full athletic scholarships. There are 363 NCAA Division I universities in the United States – they have the largest sports budgets and provide the most scholarships compared to other division levels. Universities of the II Division can pay only a partial sports scholarship.

Ivy League and Division III universities do not provide athletic scholarships, but may provide financial support on other grounds such as need-based. For those who are determined to enter the most prestigious programs of the NCAA Division I and II, it makes sense to take a closer look at the Division III. According to the NCAA, 80% of Division III athletes receive some form of financial aid from universities.

In which sports are sports scholarships awarded?

Student athletes have the most opportunities in the most popular and spectator sports that bring the most revenue to universities. These are American football and basketball for men and basketball, gymnastics, volleyball and tennis for women. The NCAA calls these sports “headcount”.

Other sports are called equivalency. Priority equivalent sports are baseball, rowing, skiing, fencing, golf, gymnastics, running, lacrosse, etc.

Division I equivalent sports for men include baseball, shooting, skiing, cross country running, track and field, football, fencing, swimming, golf, tennis, gymnastics, volleyball, hockey, water polo, lacrosse and wrestling. For Division I women, equivalent sports include bowling, lacrosse, rowing, cross country, track and field, skiing, fencing, soccer, field hockey, softball, golf, swimming, ice hockey, and water polo. All Division II and NAIA sports are equivalent sports.

For equivalent sports, the coach himself distributes the amount of his scholarship fund among the wards. He can distribute them to the most promising athletes equally or in different shares, or even give 90% of the total amount to the most star player in order to pay for his education as much as possible.

Those who play an important role in the team, such as a baseball or softball pitcher, are more likely to increase scholarships in equivalent sports. And in some cases, you can find the best offer in another division.

In some cases, the coach and the administration of the university may offer the student the option of additional assistance: a partial sports scholarship plus other support offered by the university, for example, as a student in need or for his academic merit.

How long is the sports scholarship?

Sports scholarships are most often issued only for a year, extremely rarely – for all 4 years of a bachelor’s degree. Every year, the coach evaluates his wards and makes a new decision on issuing a sports scholarship. He can either increase the size of the scholarship, reduce it, or even withdraw it altogether.

A student may lose his scholarship if he is injured, performs poorly in competitions, has a bad relationship with a coach, or because of poor academic performance or a bad reputation in a university or team.
At the same time, the coach may also revise the amount of assistance upwards if the athlete has shown good results, involvement, excitement, or has taken a more important role in the team.

Requirements for student athletes

Each association has its own requirements for athletes. The level of education and academic performance, the results of standardized tests (SAT) and foreign language tests (TOEFL) are assessed.

Associations have special selection centers – Eligibility Center. All athletes planning to participate in competitions from their university must be registered by the Association, which includes their university. Registration is required for all student athletes, not just those who want to receive a sports scholarship.
Associations charge a fee for consideration of the application and may well refuse if the package of documents is incomplete or the student does not meet all the requirements.

How to get a sports scholarship?

It is best to start preparing for admission to an American university two years before graduation. Then you will have enough time to find suitable options, create your sports resume, make friends with coaches, improve your knowledge of English and other subjects to the required level, successfully pass the required tests (TOEFL / IELTS, SAT / ACT) and complete all the necessary documentation.

Here are some important steps in preparing for admission to an American university with the help of an athletic scholarship.

Make a list of suitable universities.

At the first stage, study the websites of associations, look at the level of games and the results of sports competitions of universities in the sport of interest. Evaluate in advance which division you can apply for.

Association websites have a search for universities that you should consider for admission if you want to compete in student competitions and get a scholarship. When selecting, take into account not only the athletic achievements of student teams in your sport, but also other factors – location and suitable undergraduate programs.

List about 50 universities.

Check your eligibility for University Sports Associations.

Review all Association requirements, whether you qualify and what you need to do to meet them.

Associations set the number of core high school subjects student-athletes must take, the minimum GPA in those subjects, the minimum SAT/ACT and TOEFL/IELTS test scores for international students. Due to Covid, both universities and the Association temporarily canceled the requirement to take SAT / ACT tests, but in the future they may return it.

Assess your athletic level

This is quite a challenge. So, American students specially attend sports camps in order to better determine their capabilities. But in another country, you can contact your coaches or other sports specialists.

Create a sports resume

Sports resume should include:

• Video highlights or skills;
• Sports statistics;
• Certificate of the current level of education and academic performance, knowledge of the language.

The good reputation of an athlete is of great importance. Coaches and members of the admissions committee will definitely look through the social networks of applicants. Check all your social media accounts to make sure you don’t have any inappropriate or questionable content.

Contact and keep in touch with university coaches

On the websites of universities you can find contacts of head coaches, assistant coaches and recruitment coordinators: phone numbers and e-mail. NSCA recommends contacting coaches via email for the first time. Design your letter so that it stands out. In the subject, briefly indicate your graduation year, sports position, location, achievement. In the letter, provide links to the video and give all possible data so that the trainer can conduct an initial assessment.

Do not send mass mailing to coaches, send each letter separately. It will be a plus to indicate why you are interested in the team of this university. Do not write during the competition. If you receive letters with clarifying questions in response, try to answer as quickly as possible.

In any case, experts advise in about two weeks to contact in person, by phone, with the coaches to whom you sent your resume and clarify whether they are interested. They receive hundreds of emails every week and may well miss yours. When calling, be sure to consider time zones.

The selection process is quite lengthy. In the process of communicating with coaches, you will understand who is interested and who is not and shorten the list of promising universities. Not all trainers’ offers are accompanied by a scholarship. A coach may offer you Preferred Walk-On status – a guaranteed place on the team, but not an athletic scholarship.

But even a verbal offer of a scholarship by trainers is also not a guarantee of a scholarship. The decisive document is the National Letter of Intent (NLI, National Letter of Intent. Each of the Associations has its own versions of such a letter.

Prepare documents

Collect and prepare all documents for the university and associations. The package of documents may differ depending on the requirements of a particular institution.

Academic performance is confirmed by a transcript of a certificate of secondary education or completion of the previous academic level (translated and certified). This document includes a list of subjects studied, indicating the number of hours and grades for each quarter (semester or half year). NAIA and NJCAA require foreign applicants to confirm their level of education through the InCred service. This service costs 95 USD for those who have just finished school, or 190 USD for those who have already studied at the university. You may also need test scores, family financial documents, an essay, recommendations from teachers and coaches, etc.

Evaluate/Compare Offers

If you received sports scholarship offers from different universities, compare packages. Perhaps if the university does not have the opportunity to give a full scholarship, they can make up the difference with the help of other forms of support.

International students have good chances in sports such as tennis, athletics, ice hockey, golf, field hockey, football, water polo and basketball. There are over 20,000 international students registered with the NCAA alone. So you can become one of them in the future.

Russian Championship. 3rd division. “Tyumen-double” – “Tobol” (Kurgan)

Football – First League

July 17, 19:00

Tyumen

Khimki

Football. First League. FC Tyumen – FC Khimki

Football – Friendly match

June 24

Tyumen

2

Uralets-TS

90 002

1

Football. Friendly match. FC Tyumen – Uralets-TS

Football – FNL-2. Group 4

June 4

Novosibirsk

Tyumen

2

Football. FNL-2. Group “4”. FC Novosibirsk – FC Tyumen

Football – FNL-2. Group 4

May 28

Tyumen

7

Chelyabinsk

Football. FNL-2. Group “4”. FC Tyumen – FC Chelyabinsk

Football – FNL-2. Group 4

May 21

Amkar-Perm

Tyumen

2

Football. FNL-2. Group “4”. FC “Amkar-Perm” – FC “Tyumen”

Volleyball – Transitional matches

17 May

“Stroitel”

1

“Tyumen” Transition matches. VC “Stroitel” – VC “Tyumen”

Volleyball – Transitional matches

May 16

“Stroitel”

1

“Tyumen”

3

Volleyball.