What led to the recall of Cascade Model R and Warrior Regulator lacrosse helmets. How are manufacturers addressing safety certification issues. What impact does this have on players and teams. When can we expect a resolution to the helmet safety concerns.
The Cascade Lacrosse Helmet Recall: Understanding the Safety Concerns
In November 2024, the lacrosse community was rocked by a significant safety announcement. The National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) voided the safety certifications for two popular lacrosse helmet models: the Cascade Model R and the Warrior Regulator. This decision effectively banned these helmets from use in official play, raising concerns among players, coaches, and parents about equipment safety and compliance.
But what exactly led to this recall, and how are the manufacturers responding? Let’s delve into the details of this crucial safety issue affecting the sport of lacrosse.
Why Were the Helmets Decertified?
NOCSAE’s decision to decertify these helmets was based on rigorous testing that revealed significant safety concerns. The committee found that both helmet models failed impact tests in specific locations by considerable margins. Additionally, the helmets showed evidence of failure during high-temperature testing, further compromising their safety integrity.
It’s important to note that while both models failed the tests, they did so in different areas, indicating distinct issues for each manufacturer to address.
The Role of Third-Party Testing in Helmet Safety
Interestingly, the investigation into these helmets was not initiated by NOCSAE itself. Instead, it was prompted by third-party laboratory test results obtained by STX, a competitor to Cascade and Warrior. This highlights the important role that competition and independent testing can play in maintaining safety standards across the industry.
- STX’s helmets were found to comply with NOCSAE standards
- The same laboratory found issues with Cascade and Warrior models
- NOCSAE’s own testing confirmed these findings
This situation raises an important question: Should there be more frequent independent testing of sports equipment to ensure ongoing compliance with safety standards? Regular third-party evaluations could potentially catch issues earlier and prevent widespread recalls.
Cascade’s Response: Developing a Quick Fix
In response to the decertification, Cascade Lacrosse, based in Liverpool, New York, has acted swiftly to address the safety concerns. The company claims to have developed a simple modification that should allow their Model R helmet to regain its safety certification.
Steve Jones, a spokesman for Cascade Lacrosse, expressed confidence in their solution: “We feel confident we have a fix for the helmet.” While specific details of the modification have not been disclosed, the company has taken proactive steps to validate their solution:
- Sent technicians to NOCSAE’s testing laboratory
- Tested the proposed modification to ensure compliance
- Engaged in ongoing conversations with NOCSAE
Cascade’s quick response demonstrates the company’s commitment to player safety and their desire to resolve the issue promptly. But how long will it take for these modified helmets to be approved and available for use?
The Impact on Players and Teams: Navigating the Recall
The recall of these popular helmet models has significant implications for players and teams at all levels of lacrosse. With approximately 100,000 Cascade Model R helmets in circulation, many athletes suddenly found themselves without approved safety equipment.
This situation poses several challenges:
- Teams may need to quickly source alternative, certified helmets
- Players accustomed to specific helmet models must adapt to new equipment
- Financial concerns for individuals and organizations who recently purchased the recalled helmets
Cascade has stated that once approved, the modification will be implemented at no cost to helmet owners. This commitment helps alleviate some of the financial burden, but the logistics of modifying such a large number of helmets remain a challenge.
The Certification Process: Ensuring Rigorous Safety Standards
NOCSAE’s decertification of these helmets underscores the importance of maintaining strict safety standards in sports equipment. The committee’s process for reinstating certification is thorough and multi-faceted:
- Manufacturers must propose solutions to address specific issues
- An independent certified quality auditor must approve any proposed fixes
- Companies must pass a quality audit by the Safety Equipment Institute
- NOCSAE will only reinstate license agreements after successful completion of these steps
This rigorous process ensures that any modified helmets meet the highest safety standards before returning to the market. But how long does this certification process typically take, and what factors can influence its duration?
Warrior’s Stance: Disagreement and Cooperation
While Cascade has been vocal about their proposed solution, Warrior Sports has taken a slightly different approach. The Michigan-based company issued a statement expressing disagreement with NOCSAE’s findings but emphasized their commitment to working with the committee to resolve the issue.
This situation highlights the delicate balance manufacturers must strike between defending their products and cooperating with regulatory bodies. How do companies navigate these challenges while maintaining transparency with their customers?
The Broader Implications for Lacrosse Equipment Safety
The recall of these popular helmet models raises important questions about the overall state of lacrosse equipment safety:
- Are current testing methods sufficient to catch potential issues before products reach the market?
- Should there be more frequent retesting of certified equipment?
- How can manufacturers, regulatory bodies, and consumers work together to ensure the highest levels of safety?
This incident may prompt a broader review of safety standards and testing procedures across the sport. Could we see changes in how lacrosse equipment is certified and monitored in the future?
Moving Forward: The Future of Lacrosse Helmet Safety
As the lacrosse community awaits the resolution of this recall, it’s clear that player safety remains the top priority for all involved parties. The swift response from manufacturers and the thorough approach of NOCSAE demonstrate a commitment to addressing these concerns promptly and effectively.
Looking ahead, this incident may lead to:
- Increased scrutiny of all lacrosse equipment
- More frequent independent testing of certified products
- Greater transparency in the certification process
- Enhanced communication between manufacturers, regulatory bodies, and consumers
As the sport of lacrosse continues to grow in popularity, ensuring the safety of its players becomes increasingly crucial. This recall serves as a reminder of the ongoing need for vigilance and continuous improvement in sports equipment safety.
The Role of Players and Coaches in Equipment Safety
While manufacturers and regulatory bodies play a crucial role in equipment safety, players and coaches also have a responsibility to ensure they’re using properly certified gear. This incident highlights the importance of staying informed about equipment standards and being proactive about safety.
Players and coaches should:
- Regularly check their equipment for wear and damage
- Stay informed about current safety certifications
- Report any concerns or issues with equipment to manufacturers and governing bodies
- Prioritize safety over brand loyalty or personal preferences
By fostering a culture of safety awareness, the lacrosse community can work together to minimize risks and ensure the sport remains enjoyable for all participants.
The Economic Impact of Equipment Recalls
Beyond the immediate safety concerns, equipment recalls like this one can have significant economic implications for various stakeholders in the sport:
- Manufacturers may face financial losses due to recall costs and potential damage to brand reputation
- Retailers must manage inventory issues and customer returns
- Teams and leagues may incur unexpected expenses to replace equipment
- Individual players and families may face additional costs if replacement gear is needed
How can the industry better prepare for and mitigate the economic impact of potential future recalls? This situation may prompt discussions about risk management and financial planning within the lacrosse equipment sector.
Lessons for Other Sports
The lacrosse helmet recall offers valuable lessons that can be applied to equipment safety across various sports:
- The importance of ongoing, independent testing of certified equipment
- The need for clear communication channels between manufacturers, regulatory bodies, and consumers
- The value of swift action when safety concerns are identified
- The benefits of transparency throughout the recall and recertification process
Other sports governing bodies and equipment manufacturers may look to this case as an example of how to handle similar situations in the future. What best practices can be adopted to enhance equipment safety across all sports?
Technological Advancements in Sports Safety Equipment
As we look to the future of lacrosse helmet safety, it’s worth considering how technological advancements might play a role in preventing similar issues and enhancing overall player protection.
Some potential areas of innovation include:
- Advanced materials that offer improved impact resistance and temperature stability
- Integrated sensors that can detect and report potential damage or wear
- Customizable fitting systems that ensure optimal protection for each player
- Virtual reality simulations for more comprehensive safety testing
How might these technologies reshape the landscape of sports equipment safety in the coming years? The lacrosse community’s response to this recall could serve as a catalyst for embracing innovative safety solutions.
The Importance of Transparent Communication
Throughout this recall process, the importance of clear and transparent communication has been evident. Manufacturers, regulatory bodies, and sports organizations all play a crucial role in keeping players, parents, and coaches informed about safety issues and their resolutions.
Key aspects of effective communication in these situations include:
- Timely notifications of safety concerns and recalls
- Clear explanations of the issues and their potential impact
- Regular updates on progress towards solutions
- Easily accessible information on how to comply with safety recommendations
- Open channels for stakeholders to ask questions and voice concerns
By prioritizing transparent communication, the lacrosse community can build trust and ensure that all parties are working together effectively to maintain the highest standards of player safety.
The Global Impact of Equipment Safety Standards
While this particular recall primarily affects the North American lacrosse market, it raises important questions about global equipment safety standards in sports. As lacrosse continues to grow internationally, how can we ensure consistent safety standards across different regions and governing bodies?
Considerations for global equipment safety include:
- Harmonizing safety standards across different countries and organizations
- Addressing potential variations in testing procedures and certification requirements
- Ensuring equitable access to safe, certified equipment in emerging lacrosse markets
- Facilitating international cooperation in equipment safety research and development
By taking a global perspective on equipment safety, the lacrosse community can work towards creating a safer playing environment for athletes worldwide.
The Role of Education in Equipment Safety
As the lacrosse community navigates this recall and looks to the future, education plays a crucial role in maintaining and improving equipment safety. Players, coaches, parents, and officials all benefit from a deeper understanding of safety standards, proper equipment use, and the importance of staying informed about potential issues.
Key areas for education include:
- Understanding how to properly fit and maintain protective equipment
- Recognizing signs of wear or damage that may compromise safety
- Knowing how to verify the certification status of equipment
- Understanding the process for reporting safety concerns or equipment issues
By emphasizing education alongside technological advancements and rigorous testing, the lacrosse community can create a culture of safety that extends beyond any single piece of equipment or recall event.
Looking Ahead: The Evolution of Lacrosse Safety
As we reflect on the challenges and opportunities presented by this helmet recall, it’s clear that the landscape of lacrosse safety is continually evolving. The sport’s governing bodies, manufacturers, and participants all play vital roles in shaping a safer future for the game.
Key areas to watch in the coming years include:
- Advancements in materials science and their application to protective gear
- The integration of data analytics in equipment testing and performance monitoring
- Increased collaboration between sports science researchers and equipment manufacturers
- The potential for personalized safety equipment tailored to individual player needs
By staying vigilant, embracing innovation, and maintaining a commitment to player safety, the lacrosse community can ensure that the sport continues to thrive while prioritizing the well-being of its participants at all levels.
Liverpool company says it has fix to get its de-certified lacrosse helmet back in the game
Customize Your Weather
Set Your Location:
Enter City and State or Zip Code
Cascade Plant on Crossroads Park Drive
Kendell Broome, left, and Corey Gibson place stickers on newly assembled lacrosse helmets at Cascade Lacrosse in Clay. A standard-setting body has voided the safety certification of Cascade’s popular Model R lacrosse helmet.
(Ellen M. Blalock | [email protected], 2012)
Syracuse, N.Y. — A Liverpool area company says a simple modification to one of its popular models of lacrosse helmets should earn it back a safety certification that was ripped away by an independent standard-setting body last month.
“We feel confident we have a fix for the helmet,” said Steve Jones, a spokesman for Cascade Lacrosse, of Clay.
The National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment voided the manufacturers’ certification for Cascade’s Model R lacrosse helmet, as well as the Regulator model made by Warrior Sports, of Warren, Mich.
, on Nov. 24.
“The helmet testing by our technical director revealed that each of these models failed by significant margins in specific impact locations, although each model failed in different areas,” NOCSAE said. “Both models also showed evidence of significant failures during high-temperature testing.”
Cascade Lacrosse’s popular Model R, above, has been de-certified by the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment. The Liverpool, N.Y., company said it has developed a fix that should allow the helmet to be certified for use again.
NOCSAE said its decision to begin an investigation into the helmets was prompted by third-party laboratory test results obtained by Baltimore-based STX, a competitor to Cascade and Warrior.
The laboratory used by STX and NOCSAE’s own testing found that STX’s helmets complied with the committee’s standards but that the two models from Cascade and Warrior did not, NOCSAE said.
NOCSAE, a nonprofit organization formed in 1969 to set performance standards for athletic equipment, said its investigation included a review of Cascade’s and Warrior’s internal certification testing and quality control data.
The committee cannot require manufacturers to recall products, but voiding their certification effectively bans them from the market. Rules of play established by governing bodies such as US Lacrosse, the National Collegiate Athletic Association and the National Federation of State High School Associations require that lacrosse helmets meet NOCSAE’s standards and prohibit schools from using helmets that do not.
Jones said Cascade disagrees with the committee’s findings and that two testing laboratories that the company used to evaluate its Model R helmet found that it met the committee’s standards.
However, he said the company has developed a modification that it believes will receive the committee’s approval. He said Cascade has been having conversations with the committee and was “extremely confident” that the committee will approve the fix “in the coming days.”
Cascade said on its website it has sent technicians to NOCSAE’s testing laboratory to test what it believes is a “viable and simple modification to existing helmets” to ensure they comply with the NOCSAE standard.
Jones declined to provide details of the proposed modification, saying the company would wait for the committee to approve it before releasing details. He said the fix would be done at no cost to owners of the helmets and that new helmets manufactured at the company’s headquarters on Crossroads Park Drive in Clay would include the modification.
Warrior issued a statement saying it also disagreed with NOCSAE’s finding but was working with the committee to resolve this issue.
Mike Oliver, executive director of the nonprofit, standard-setting committee formed in 1969, could not be reached for comment regarding Cascade’s proposed fix. But on its website, NOCSAE said it has been cooperating with the company’s efforts to retrofit the helmet.
“Ultimately, any solution proposed by either company to address the specific models will have to meet the approval of an independent certified quality auditor before NOCSAE will approve the solution,” the committee said.
It said Cascade and Warrior will also have to successfully pass a quality audit by the Safety Equipment Institute before the committee will reinstate its license agreements with the companies.
Cascade has sold approximately 100,000 of its Model R lacrosse helmets, making it one of the most popular models on the market. The helmets sell for up to approximately $250.
The manufacturer employs 70 people at its factory in Clay, which also makes hockey helmets.
The company was founded as Sports Helmets in 1986 by Bill Brine and later changed its name to Cascade Sports. Bauer Performance Sports, of Exeter, N.H., bought Cascade for $64 million in 2012 but has kept the factory in Clay. Bauer recently changed its name to Performance Sports Group.
Contact Rick Moriarty anytime: Email | Twitter | Facebook | 315-470-3148
If you purchase a product or register for an account through one of the links on our site, we may receive compensation. By browsing this site, we may share your information with our social media partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
STX Helmet Destroyed at Ohio State
[mks_col]
[mks_two_thirds]
[mks_dropcap style=”rounded” size=”42″ bg_color=”#666666″ txt_color=”#ffffff”]O[/mks_dropcap]n Thursday, January 29, 2015, the Ohio State men’s lacrosse program held a typical pre-season practice.
With snow still piled up on the sidelines from a storm a few days prior and the temperature somewhere in the thirties, the Buckeyes’ man-up and man-down units took the field.
At some point during that man-up/man-down session, one of the team’s defenseman was hit by a shot to the head at close range. Eleven days later, on Monday, February 9, a photo of the STX helmet he was wearing when he took the hit surfaced on Instagram and Twitter.
As one would expect in this day and age, it didn’t take long for the photo to cause serious commotion amongst the sport’s most passionate – and most important – stakeholders. From concerned consumers young and old to frustrated professional lacrosse players and industry professionals, many quickly took to social media to air their grievances about the image.
#NocsaeCertified pic.twitter.com/V69a1yU6U9
— Greg Gurenlian (@GregBeast32) February 10, 2015
Manufactured in partnership with Schutt Sports, the Stallion 500 helmet that the OSU player was wearing was introduced by STX last fall.
The release was accompanied by test results from competitive analysis of the Cascade R and Warrior Regulator helmets, comparing those models to the new STX helmet.
Since as far back as I can remember (I was born in 1991), Cascade in particular has dominated the market. Connor Wilson, publisher of LaxAllStars.com, recently spoke with the New York Times about Cascade’s roughly 90% market share at the time of STX making the test results public.
The test results STX made public sparked an investigation by NOCSAE, and the Cascade and Warrior models were decertified on the eve of the holiday shopping season.
Within weeks of the decertification news, Cascade introduced a simple solution to modify the current R helmets that was approved by NOCSAE. Consumers must ship their R helmets to Cascade headquarters for the modification to be applied, but once complete, the helmet is re-certified and legal to wear at all levels of play.
Meanwhile, Warrior continued toward a solution and recently announced that it will be replacing the original Regulator with a new and improved Regulator II model.
Owners of the original Regulator model may exchange theirs free of charge at any Lacrosse Unlimited store nationwide. The exchange doesn’t have to be for a Warrior brand helmet.
In light of the coverage around the lacrosse helmet decertifications, seeing the photo of the new STX helmet, and hearing a handful of disturbing rumors about status of the player who was hit by the shot, LaxAllStars.com launched its own investigation into the incident at Ohio State.
[/mks_two_thirds]
[mks_one_third]
[mks_icon icon=”fa-search” color=”#bb0000″ type=”fa”] Timeline
Here’s a timeline of our entire investigation into this incident.
» 2/9
› 2:00pm: Image spotted on social media
› 7:00pm: LAS team meeting to discuss
› 10:00pm: Inquires emailed to OSU coaches & SID, STX contacts
» 2/10
› 2:00pm: LAS team meeting to discuss
› 2:30pm: Conference call with CEOs of STX & Schutt
› 3:45pm: Received phone confirmation from OSU
› 3:50pm: Received statement from OSU
› 5:00pm: Issued follow-up questions to STX & Schutt
› 7:00pm: LAS team meeting to discuss
» 2/11
› 10:13am: Responses received from Schutt
› 12:00pm: LAS team meeting to discuss
› 2:30pm: Call with Lantern reporter Molly T.
› 3:38pm: More follow-up questions sent to Schutt
› 5:31pm: Answers received from Schutt
› 8:52pm: LAS team meeting to discuss
› 10:00pm: Finalize draft
» 2/12
› 12:58am: Publish
[mks_separator style=”solid” height=”4″]
Related Stories
• STX Helmet Goes To Market In Strange Way
• NOCSAE Voids Two Helmet Certifications
• Helmetgate Rolls On
• Cascade Announces Solution for R Helmet
• Helmetgate: Warrior Statement, Update
• Safety is More Important than ‘Cool Factor’
• Warrior Updates Plan for Helmet Exchanges
[/mks_one_third]
[/mks_col]
Conversations at C-Level
Prior to receiving word back from those who we had reached out to at The Ohio State University, we spoke to Jason Goger, CEO of STX, and Robert Erb, CEO of Schutt Sports, on a conference call Tuesday afternoon. Erb, who was traveling and in London at the time, had been briefed on the situation but he had not yet seen the photo.
Meanwhile, Goger of STX was able to shed light on the incident and give us the status of the player who had been hit.
Goger informed us that the player indeed was a defenseman and confirmed that he did get hit by a shot at close range during man-up/man-down. While he could not tell us who the player was, he did tell us that the name being spread across social media was inaccurate.
According to Goger, the shot damaged the helmet but there was no critical injury to the athlete himself. The impact did cause a cut on the player’s head, but it only required brief attention from the athletic trainer.
The player was able to strap on an extra Buckeye helmet that was available and continued participating at practice. He played in Ohio State’s scrimmage against Duke on January 31 as well as the team’s home opener against Detroit on Tuesday.
After finding out the player was okay from Goger, the conversation turned back to the Stallion 500 lacrosse helmet and whether or not the helmet was destroyed by the ball because of some kind of flaw or malfunction in the product.
“I don’t think that the helmet malfunctioned because the kid took the helmet off, put another helmet on and continued to play. I also know that the helmet is in compliance with NOCSAE and I would think that it would be a gross exaggeration to say that helmets never crack,” Erb, CEO of Schutt, explained.
Throughout our conversation, Goger and Erb stood by the Stallion, both mentioning that it may have been a much different – and much worse – outcome had the player been wearing something other than the Stallion 500 to protect his head.
Everyone gets a new STX helmet the next day
It wasn’t until we heard from OSU that we learned about the replacement of all of the team’s outer shells. Here’s the official statement from Ohio State Athletics:
During an Ohio State men’s lacrosse practice Jan. 29, a helmet was broken after it was hit by a ball shot from close range at a high rate of speed. The involved student-athlete was immediately examined by the medical staff for injuries and was able to continue practicing and competing without any interruption.
Following the incident, STX, the helmet supplier, immediately replaced the outer shell of all of the team’s helmets and there have been no issues during practices or competitions. Student-athlete safety is of utmost importance both to Ohio State and STX. Helmets used by Ohio State varsity student-athletes in all sports have been approved for player safety by the NOCSAE (National Operating Committee for Standards for Athletic Equipment).
Why the whole team? Why so much damage from a ball?
We followed up with Erb and Goger about the outer shells and what this might mean for other lacrosse players out there in the world who have purchased or received a Stallion 500 helmet. Could this happen to another athlete who wears a Stallion 500?
After the incident occurred at Ohio State, Schutt immediately sent an R&D engineer to Columbus to investigate. At first, when factoring in the temperature at the time, they thought it might have been an issue with the metallic paint used on the Buckeyes’ helmets.
In this image, used to promote the team on Buckeyes website, the team captains are wearing their Stallion helmets.
Replacing the team’s helmets was the best way for Schutt to have a chance at figuring out what may have gone wrong. That action also likely provided some peace of mind for the Ohio State players and coaching staff. However, replacing the helmets of one collegiate team does not universally answer and solve the quandary of the broken helmet.
From our conversations with Schutt, their opinion is steadfastly that this was not a helmet malfunction, but rather a perfect storm of unlikely circumstances. Erb explained:
“…we have not been able to replicate the conditions that let to the helmet cracking. It may simply come down to the fact that it was a painted helmet on a cold day struck by a hard ball by a strong collegiate athlete at point-blank range that struck at the edge of one of the vent holes resulting in a crack. In other words, the helmet surrendered itself and protected the athlete from a more serious injury.
”
If the player had been wearing anything but the Stallion 500, the result could have been much worse, according to Schutt, and despite the break, the helmet did what it was supposed to do and protected the player from more serious harm.
The future of Stallion 500 lacrosse helmets
There are currently no plans for a recall of the Stallion 500 helmets or an immediate change to the product because a problem has not been diagnosed.
“We are continuing to do lab and field testing with the helmets. We are committed to relentless innovation, so enhancements and improvements are inevitable. We are sharing what we learn with STX and NOCSAE routinely,” Erb said.
The partnership agreement between Schutt and STX, both of which are private companies, is broken down as follows: Schutt designs, develops and manufacturers the helmets while STX handles marketing, sales and distribution. STX serves as the resident lacrosse expert in the relationship.
“If there are good ideas on how to make a product better we’re going to make it better,” added Goger.
STX and Schutt acknowledge that in every aspect of product development there is room for improvement or changes, so STX is openly accepting feedback on how to make the best lacrosse helmet for all who play the game.
The dirty truth about NOCSAE standards
So here we have another could-be scandal from one of the top equipment manufacturers in the sport of lacrosse. Following the decertifying of Cascade and Warrior helmets that put all manufacturers in the spotlight, one would hope those who decide NOCSAE standards are paying attention.
However, in this specific incident at Ohio State and another instance we saw over the weekend, the unique set of circumstances that led to players’ helmets breaking shines new light on a NOCSAE standard, or lack there of, that has given us pause.
The other instance I mention occurred during the UMBC/Johns Hopkins men’s lacrosse game that aired on 02/07/2015. 8:22 minutes into the 3rd quarter, the Retriever’s goalie took a high impact shot straight to the facemask that caused his forehead to bleed and he eventually left the game minutes later.
In this case, it was in the 40’s and the player was wearing a Cascade R helmet.
In my own opinion, NOCSAE standards do not call for any testing of the impact of a lacrosse ball hitting a helmet. From my vantage point as a collegiate official, I have always thought this to be odd. I’d recommend testing the impact of a collision between ball and helmet, at close range and distance and from high speeds be a good place to start. Create better helmet testing based on the variables of a lacrosse game.
Another important thing to thing to note, which Erb reminded us about via email earlier today, is that there are currently no NOCSAE standards for extremely cold temperatures. Just consider the impact a frozen, solid rubber lacrosse ball may have at speeds into the 100’s. Whereas effectively officiating the rules and teaching the fundamentals of the game can help prevent helmet-to-helmet contact, we can only do so much to prevent where the ball goes.
“I might suggest that NOCSAE consider a new ball standard, which includes testing at low temperature,” expressed Erb in his last remarks to us.
Player safety is of the utmost importance to the lifespan and popularity of lacrosse. In light of the publicity that concussions are receiving across the sports world, it is the responsibility of every equipment manufacturer to create only the highest caliber products. Hopefully that was the case for STX, Schutt, and the Stallion 500.
Only time will tell. And possibly more cold weather.
Jeff Brunelle and Molly Tavoletti contributed to this report.
Cascade Pro 7 CTS Lacrosse Helmet MLL White with Chrome Mask FAST SHIP! J6
Best-seller
- Code:
- 67181636
Out of stock
We cooperate with CASCADE lacrosse protective equipment suppliers and offer you the best deals on branded products from America. Based on our many years of experience, we select only the best positions from outlets and discounters in order to provide you with the best prices, which do not include additional costs for renting retail premises.
Delivery of goods is carried out directly from our warehouse to the address indicated by you. You get an original product at a price that is not available in local stores. In our online store you will always find a wide range of branded products with great discounts.
We follow every step of your purchase and provide order tracking every step of the way, from the moment you pay.
Characteristics
General characteristics
- MPN
- PRO7CWWW
- UPC
- 761570904050
- Model
- Pro 7
- Body Area
- Face
- Sport/Activity
- lacrosse
Capacity
- Type
- Helmet
- Color
- White
Features
- Floor
- Unisex
Specifications
- Brand
- CASCADE
Description
Description
Description
Cascade Pro 7 CTS Lacrosse Helmet MLL White with Mask Chrome FAST SH IP!J6
- New with Tags, First Quality
- FAST USA Shipper!
- Get a great deal!
- Thanks!
Payment
- We ship very fast, usually within hours of purchase.
No one likes to wait!
No one likes to wait!Shipping
- We ship daily by USPS, UPS & FedEx. We pick the best way to your zip!
Terms of Sale
- We want you to be 100% satisfied. Our goal is fast service, 5-star Feeback, and your repeat business. thank you!
About Us
- We love what we do. We create values for you. We work hard to describe the product. Please read the listing before purchase.
- Non-functional items are listed “FOR PARTS or REPAIR”, and are sold AS-IS No Returns.
- We want to fully inform you, noting any missing items, scrapes, or scuffs to the best of our ability.
- If you have an issue, please do not open a case through eBay. We Guarantee your satisfaction 100%
Contact Us
- We monitor eBay messages often. Use eBay messaging to “Ask Seller a Question”.
- Ebay messages are answered daily as quickly as possible – Fast!
- Your 5 Star Feeback is very, very important to us.
Shipping
We deliver goods directly from Germany to Russia by courier or to the post office.
You can choose the shipping method that suits you when you place an order. The shipping cost depends on the chosen method.
Delivery time depends on the chosen city and delivery method, but on average it takes from 10 to 30 days. If you place an order right now, we will deliver it between July 30 – 19August.
For more than 10 years, we have been working with reliable and proven services and offer delivery of CASCADE lacrosse protective equipment to various cities in Russia, such as Moscow,
St. Petersburg, Novosibirsk, Yekaterinburg, Kazan, Nizhny Novgorod, Chelyabinsk, Samara, Ufa, Rostov, Omsk, Krasnoyarsk, Voronezh and others.
You can always track your order using the parcel number as soon as it is sent to you from our warehouse.
Brand catalog
- CASCADE brand catalog
- Protective equipment for lacrosse CASCADE
- Protective equipment for lacrosse
- sporting goods
Protective Lacrosse Brands
Hanteļu statīvs Marbo Sport MP-S207, 2 modules
Description
Modular dumbbell rack
Professional dumbbell rack MP-S207 is one of the basic equipment in your gym.
The MP-S207 stand is a device thanks to which you can save space in your club.
Thanks to the cascade structure of the frame and the special shape of the dumbbell shelf, it is very comfortable to use and takes up little valuable space in your club.
Notes:
The subject of the sale are two rack modules.
Professional line – equipment for commercial use
The best that a real bodybuilder can meet – the Marbo Professional series.
The equipment in this line has a declaration of compliance with the PN-EN 957-4: 2007 standard and can be used in commercial and public utility gyms. Experience the pleasure of exercising with the best equipment on the market! Class: S – Equipment intended for commercial use.
Applied solutions
Dumbbell rack
You can put dumbbells with a gripping part of at least 120 mm on the rack.
A specially profiled shelf made of thick sheet # 4 mm ensures maximum strength of the structure and allows for quick removal and putting away of dumbbells.
The ends of the shelves are equipped with special locks that prevent the dumbbells from sliding off the rack.
Design aesthetics
Remember, the appearance of the equipment is a decisive factor in whether a given client buys a subscription at your gym. Everyone prefers to exercise on modern, interesting and visually attractive equipment.
When designing the Professional line equipment, we set ourselves the task of making it perfect in every, even the smallest detail.
We connected the legs of the stand with a thick metal plate cut into a decorative shape. Thanks to this, the stand is 100% stable and has an attractive appearance.
Modular design
The stand consists of segments that can be combined into any length.
The basic element is 110 cm long and weighs 56 kg.
Choose the size yourself
Thanks to the possibility of combining, you can create a rack that is properly matched to your set of dumbbells.
To make your purchase easier, we have created 4 ready-made sets of stands of different lengths: 110, 220, 330
and 440 cm.
Technical data
About Marbo Sport
“We don’t believe in coincidences, we believe in hard work,” say the owners of Marbo-Sport, who founded the company 30 years ago. Currently, it is the largest Polish manufacturer of classic sports sets for gyms and at home. From the very beginning, the company’s goal was to help people improve their physical fitness without leaving their homes. The company quickly expanded its range to include professional gym equipment and competition preparation products.
“This journey has led us to where we are today,” the company says. Bodybuilding has become not only the biggest passion, but also an area in which Marbo successfully specializes. The manufactured equipment is distinguished by its strength, durability and impact resistance. The range includes products for home training, semi-professional and professional lines, as well as equipment for martial arts.
. . .
