Which teams are leading the USILA Division II men’s lacrosse rankings. How are GLVC programs performing in the national poll. What factors are influencing team positions in the latest USILA coaches poll.
USILA Division II Men’s Lacrosse Rankings Overview
The United States Intercollegiate Lacrosse Association (USILA) has released its latest Division II men’s lacrosse rankings, providing insight into the top-performing teams across the nation. This poll, voted on by coaches, serves as a crucial benchmark for assessing team performance and potential as the season progresses.
Top 5 Teams in the USILA Division II Poll
- Le Moyne (23 first-place votes) – 479 points, 10-0 record
- Lenoir-Rhyne – 432 points, 13-1 record
- Tampa (1 first-place vote) – 427 points, 7-0 record
- Mercyhurst – 387 points, 10-1 record
- Seton Hill – 382 points, 10-1 record
Le Moyne continues to dominate the rankings with an undefeated 10-0 record and 23 first-place votes. Lenoir-Rhyne and Tampa are closely contesting the second and third spots, with Tampa receiving one first-place vote despite having played fewer games.
Great Lakes Valley Conference (GLVC) Teams in the Rankings
Three GLVC men’s lacrosse programs have secured positions in the latest USILA national poll, demonstrating the conference’s strength in Division II lacrosse.
- University of Indianapolis – Ranked 10th (8-2 record)
- Lindenwood University – Ranked 11th (9-2 record)
- Rockhurst University – Ranked 20th (8-4 record)
The University of Indianapolis and Lindenwood University have maintained their positions from the previous week, while Rockhurst University remains at the 20th spot despite a recent defeat by Lindenwood.
Impact of Recent Games on Rankings
Recent matchups have had a significant impact on team rankings. The University of Indianapolis, in particular, saw a notable surge in their position following a victory over Lindenwood in a top-10 showdown.
Key Performances Influencing Rankings
- UIndy’s 11-9 victory over Lindenwood at Key Stadium
- Goalkeeper Austin Barnett’s 14 saves for UIndy
- Drew Billig’s 6-point performance (4 goals, 2 assists) for UIndy
- Freshman Caleb Parker’s dominance in face-offs (13 out of 23 won)
These performances have solidified UIndy’s position in the top 10 and demonstrate the competitive nature of GLVC lacrosse.
Significance of USILA Rankings for Division II Programs
The USILA rankings play a crucial role in Division II men’s lacrosse, influencing everything from team morale to postseason prospects. But how exactly do these rankings impact programs?
Importance of USILA Rankings
- Provides national recognition for successful programs
- Influences recruitment efforts for top high school talent
- Serves as a motivational tool for teams and players
- Can impact seeding in conference and national tournaments
For GLVC teams like Indianapolis, Lindenwood, and Rockhurst, maintaining and improving their positions in these rankings is crucial for their program’s growth and success.
Upcoming GLVC Men’s Lacrosse Tournament
With the regular season winding down, attention is turning to the 2021 GLVC Men’s Lacrosse Tournament. How are teams preparing for this crucial postseason event?
Tournament Details
- Start Date: Friday, May 7, 2021
- Top Seed: Lindenwood University
- Second Seed: University of Indianapolis
- Third Seed: Rockhurst University
The cancellation of UIndy’s remaining regular-season games due to COVID-19 protocols has given the team extra preparation time for the tournament. The final matchups and schedule are yet to be determined, adding an element of anticipation to the upcoming event.
Factors Influencing Team Performance and Rankings
Several factors contribute to a team’s success and subsequent ranking in the USILA poll. What are some of the key elements that coaches and players focus on to improve their standing?
Key Performance Factors
- Win-loss record
- Strength of schedule
- Goal differential
- Individual player statistics
- Performance in key matchups against ranked opponents
Teams like Le Moyne, with their perfect 10-0 record, exemplify how consistent performance throughout the season can lead to a top ranking. Meanwhile, programs like UIndy demonstrate how victories in crucial games can lead to significant jumps in the poll.
Impact of COVID-19 on the 2021 Season
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect college sports, including Division II men’s lacrosse. How has this global health crisis influenced the current season and rankings?
COVID-19 Effects on Lacrosse
- Cancellation or postponement of games
- Varied number of games played by teams
- Implementation of health and safety protocols
- Potential impact on player development and team chemistry
The cancellation of UIndy’s remaining regular-season games due to COVID-19 protocols serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges teams face. This situation also highlights the resilience and adaptability required of programs to navigate the uncertain landscape of college sports during a pandemic.
Looking Ahead: Postseason Implications of USILA Rankings
As the regular season concludes and teams prepare for conference tournaments and potential NCAA championship berths, the USILA rankings take on added significance. How might these rankings influence postseason play?
Postseason Considerations
- Conference tournament seeding
- At-large bids for NCAA Division II Men’s Lacrosse Championship
- Matchups in early rounds of NCAA tournament
- Team and player motivation heading into postseason play
For teams on the bubble, like those ranked in the 15-20 range, strong performances in the final games of the season and conference tournaments could be crucial for securing a spot in the NCAA championship field.
As the excitement builds towards the postseason, lacrosse fans and players alike will be closely watching how the final regular-season games and conference tournaments impact the USILA rankings. These rankings not only reflect the current landscape of Division II men’s lacrosse but also set the stage for what promises to be an thrilling conclusion to the 2021 season.
Three GLVC Men’s Lacrosse Programs Appear in Latest USILA Rankings
Three GLVC Men’s Lacrosse Programs Appear in Latest USILA Rankings
Cody Wainscott, Director of Communications
Tweet #GLVCmlax
LOUISVILLE, Ky. – Three Great Lakes Valley Conference (GLVC) men’s lacrosse programs appear in the latest United States Intercollegiate Lacrosse Association (USILA) national poll, released Monday.
University of Indianapolis (8-2) and Lindenwood University (9-2) held steady in their respective No. 10 and No. 11 positions on Monday. The Lions enter the weekend as the top seed in the GLVC Championship Tournament, while the Greyhounds earned the No. 2 seed.
Rockhurst University (8-4) remained at No. 20 following a defeat by Lindenwood over the weekend. The Hawks are the No. 3 seed in this spring’s league postseason tournament.
USILA DII Poll
| Rank | School (1st-place votes) | Points | Record | Prev. |
| 1 | Le Moyne (23) | 479 | 10-0 | 1 |
| 2 | Lenoir-Rhyne | 432 | 13-1 | 3 |
| 3 | Tampa (1) | 427 | 7-0 | 2 |
| 4 | Mercyhurst | 387 | 10-1 | 4 |
| 5 | Seton Hill | 382 | 10-1 | 5 |
| 6 | Wingate | 351 | 11-2 | 6 |
| 7 | Adelphi | 348 | 7-2 | 7 |
| 8 | Mercy | 308 | 8-1 | 8 |
| 9 | Saint Anselm | 279 | 11-0 | 9 |
| 10 | Indianapolis | 234 | 8-2 | 10 |
| 11 | Lindenwood | 227 | 9-2 | 11 |
| 12 | Mount Olive | 213 | 11-2 | 12 |
| 13 | Belmont Abbey | 184 | 10-4 | 13 |
| 14 | Pace | 144 | 6-6 | 16 |
| 15 | Limestone | 140 | 10-4 | 15 |
| 16 | Frostburg State | 132 | 6-2 | 14 |
| 17 | Lynn | 123 | 5-1 | 17 |
| 18 | Colorado Mesa | 89 | 8-1 | 18 |
| 19 | Bentley | 50 | 6-4 | 19 |
| T-20 | Rockhurst | 30 | 8-4 | 20 |
| T-20 | Chestnut Hill | 30 | 8-2 | N/R |
Men’s Lacrosse Jumps in USILA Rankings
Story Links
LOUISVILLE, Ky.
– After emerging victorious in a top-10 meeting last week on Senior Day, the No. 10 UIndy men’s lacrosse team (8-2, 8-2 GLVC) surged up four spots in the recent United States Intercollegiate Lacrosse Association (USILA) Coaches Poll for Division II, the organization announced on Monday.
The Greyhounds took down then-ranked No. 9 Lindenwood last weekend, ousting the Lions on a final score of 11-9 at Key Stadium on Saturday, April 24. Goal keeper Austin Barnett took charge in collecting 14 saves on the day, his fifth contest of the season holding a double-digit total in that statistical category. Drew Billig led the team with six points against Lindenwood, scoring four goals on six shots on goal and throwing a pair of assists into the mix as well. Freshman Caleb Parker was the Hounds’ main player in the face off circle against Lindenwood, the Bixby, Okla., native collected six ground balls and won 13 out of 23 face offs to push the Hounds’ offense.
A handful of other GLVC institutions remain in the top-20 rankings, UIndy pacing the conference at the No. 10 spot as of right now with their 7-2 record. Lindenwood follows closely behind them after dropping two spots, the Lions now ranking 11th overall. Rockhurst moves back into the rankings with their recent success and 7-3 record, rounding out the poll at the No. 20 spot.
With the recent cancellation of the Greyhounds’ two remaining contests in the regular season due to COVID-19 protocols, the Hounds will now get an extra week to prepare for the 2021 GLVC Men’s Lacrosse Tournament in two weeks. As many other teams still playing out the rest of the regular season, the Hounds only know the start date of the tournament (Friday, May 7), but not the first round time or opponent. Stay up to date on who the Greyhounds will face off first at UIndyAthletics.com.
Below is a complete list of the top-20 rankings:
Captains Ranked Ninth in Latest USILA National Coaches Poll; Men’s Lacrosse Begins Three-Game Road Swing at Washington & Lee on Tuesday
Live Stats // Video Stream
LEXINGTON, Va.
—
For the fifth straight week, the Christopher Newport men’s lacrosse team was listed in the top-10 of the USILA National Coaches Poll as the Captains were slotted ninth in the latest rankings ahead of Tuesday’s non-conference showdown at Washington & Lee.
In the poll, Christopher Newport picked up 225 points to remain in the top-10 of the USILA rankings. Meanwhile, Washington & Lee was slotted just outside of the top-20 as the Generals received 19 points, placing them 12 behind No. 20 Ohio Wesleyan.
Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, Washington & Lee will not allow visiting fans to attend home games this spring. However, the Generals will provide live stats and a video stream of Tuesday’s action at GeneralsSports.com. Direct links to both features can be found at the top of this release and on the schedule page.
Entering Tuesday’s battle, Christopher Newport sits at 7-4 on the season, including 4-2 on the road.
Meanwhile, Washington & Lee is 6-3 with a pristine 4-0 mark at home.
Through 11 games this season, Brady Altobello and Dylan Rice both rank among the top-10 in the conference in goals. Altobello is fifth with 28 strikes, while Rice is eighth with 24. Meanwhile, both veterans also stand in the top-10 in total points, while sophomore Drew Miller is eighth overall with 12 assists.
On the defensive side, Phoenix Hines is second in the conference in takeaways with 19. Ryan Young also ranks third with 18 caused turnovers, and Max Wayne is sixth with 15. Additionally, Young leads all defensemen with 38 ground balls, and Zac Hanway has compiled a .527 save percentage and a 10.74 goals-against-average. Both of those rates place him second among conference goalies.
Washington & Lee was last in action on Sunday when the team improved to 4-0 at home with a 17-1 victory against Shenandoah.
Outstanding on their home turf, the Generals also posted a 12-10 triumph over No. 3 Lynchburg earlier this month at Wilson Field.
Overall this season, W&L has been led by Stuart Greenspon, who boasts a team-high 18 goals and 11 assists. Ben Mulholland has also found the back of the cage 15 times, while Taylor Witherell is coming off of a five-point explosion against Shenandoah on Sunday. Defensively, Michael Horgan leads the team with 10 takeaways, and Jack Taylor ranks among the ODAC leaders with a .594 save percentage and a 9.45 goals-against-average.
Tuesday’s game will be the ninth all-time meeting between the Captains and Generals. Washington & Lee won the most recent showdown, 14-7, in Lexington on February 13, 2019. During that battle, Greenspon notched two goals for the hosts, while Rice had a pair for Christopher Newport. Altobello, Griffin Hanes, and Will Stockhausen all scored for the visitors as well.
Following the midweek match-up, the Captains will remain on the road for a 1 p.
m. test at Southern Virginia on Saturday.
—ISH—
FSC Men’s Lacrosse Opens Season Ranked #19 by USILA
Story Links
LOUISVILLE, Ky. – The Florida Southern College men’s lacrosse team has been selected as the No. 19 team in the country, according to the US Intercollegiate Lacrosse Association 2021 Pre-Season Coaches poll.
Earlier this preseason, the Mocs were ranked No. 17 in the Nike/US Lacrosse Division II Preseason Top 20 poll.
One of six Sunshine State Conference members in this year’s USILA preseason poll, the Mocs completed the 2020 campaign ranked #19 by the USILA.
Florida Southern will be led by senior midfielder Kevin Horwitz, who earned Third Team All-America status from Inside Lacrosse a year ago. In the shortened 2020 campaign, he won 80.1% of his face-offs, 113 wins in 141 opportunities. His 71 groundballs led the team.
At one point, he won more than 20 face-offs in three straight games. On February 29, he won 26 of 28 face-offs in a 16-9 win over Montevallo. He returned on March 4 to win all 26 face-offs he took in a 15-9 loss to Saint Rose, then recorded 23 wins in 27 chances on March 8, in a 13-10 win over No. 13 Mount Olive. His 26 faceoff wins against Saint Rose tied the school record for most faceoff wins in a single season.
USILA DIVISION II MEN’S PRESEASON COACHES POLL
| Rank | Division 2. | Total | Record |
| 1 | Le Moyne (12) | 372 | 0-0 |
| 2 | Tampa (7) | 362 | 0-0 |
| 3 | Belmont Abbey | 315 | 0-0 |
| 4 | Mercyhurst | 311 | 0-0 |
| 5 | Seton Hill | 281 | 0-0 |
| 6 | Limestone | 277 | 0-0 |
| 7 | Adelphi | 266 | 0-0 |
| 8 | Lenoir-Rhyne | 259 | 0-0 |
| 9 | Mercy | 211 | 0-0 |
| 10 | Indianapolis | 173 | 0-0 |
| 11 | Queens U. of Charlotte | 151 | 0-0 |
| 12 | Mount Olive | 148 | 0-0 |
| 13 | Pace | 145 | 0-0 |
| 14 | Lindenwood | 140 | 0-0 |
| 15 | Wingate | 130 | 0-0 |
| 16 | Rockhurst | 100 | 0-0 |
| 16 | Colorado Mesa | 100 | 0-0 |
| 18 | Saint Anselm | 66 | 0-0 |
| 19 | Florida Southern | 55 | 0-0 |
| 20 | Frostburg State | 27 | 0-0 |
| ARV | Saint Leo | 26 | 0-0 |
| ARV | Lynn | 19 | 0-0 |
| ARV | Rollins | 9 | 0-0 |
| ARV | Bentley | 9 | 0-0 |
| ARV | Saint Rose | 7 | 0-0 |
| ARV | Florida Tech | 6 | 0-0 |
| ARV | Chestnut Hill | 6 | 0-0 |
Gettysburg Ranked Eighth in USILA D3 Poll
Story Links
GETTYSBURG, Pa.
– The Gettysburg College men’s lacrosse team improved its standing in the second preseason poll released this season, locking onto the No. 8 spot in the United States Intercollegiate Lacrosse Association (USILA) Division III Coaches’ Preseason Poll released on Wednesday, Feb. 3.
Gettysburg, which was picked ninth in the Nike/US Lacrosse Magazine Division III Preseason Top 20 on Jan. 22, swooped into eighth in the coaches’ poll with 276 points, just seven shy of Denison University in seventh. Salisbury University claimed the top spot with 19 first-place votes and 456 points, while Tufts University claimed the remaining four first-place tallies and 429 points. RIT, Cabrini University, Williams College, and Ursinus College rounded out the top six.
The Centennial Conference featured three teams among the top 20 with No. 16 Franklin & Marshall College joining Ursinus and Getysburg. Dickinson College also received votes.
Gettysburg was ranked ninth by the coaches in last season’s preseason ballot and the team closed the pandemic-shortened 2020 campaign in the same slot.
The Bullets went 6-1 and were riding a four-game winning streak before season’s end, which included wins over No. 16 Stevenson University (10-5) and No. 9 York (Pa.) College (7-6, OT).
Head Coach Hank Janczyk will steer the Bullets into uncharted territory heading into his 34th campaign at Gettysburg. Janczyk, who is the second-winningest coach all-time in the history of collegiate lacrosse, and his student-athletes await an announcement from the Centennial Conference Presidents’ Council on the future of the spring season.
| Rank | Institution (1st) | Total | Record | Last Week |
| 1 | Salisbury (19) | 456 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 2 | Tufts (4) | 429 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 3 | RIT | 402 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 4 | Cabrini | 344 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 5 | Williams | 318 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 6 | Ursinus | 304 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 7 | Denison | 283 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 8 | Gettysburg | 276 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 9 | York | 241 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 10 | Wesleyan | 235 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 11 | Union | 206 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 12 | Lynchburg | 174 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 13 | Christopher Newport | 155 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 14 | Amherst | 151 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 15 | Saint John Fisher | 146 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 16 | Franklin & Marshall | 144 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 17 | St. Lawrence | 106 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 18 | Stevens | 63 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 19 | Middlebury | 58 | 0-0 | N/R |
| 20 | Washington and Lee | 50 | 0-0 | N/R |
Mount Olive and Belmont Abbey in Top 20 in Latest USILA/Dynamic Team Sports Top 20 Coaches Poll
Mount Olive and Belmont Abbey in Top 20 in Latest USILA/Dynamic Team Sports Top 20 Coaches Poll
GREENVILLE, S.
C. – Both Mount Olive and Belmont Abbey men’s lacrosse are both ranked in the top 20 in the latest United States Intercollegiate Lacrosse Association (USILA) and Dynamic Team Sport national rankings.
Mount Olive is ninth in the latest rankings, while Belmont Abbey is 17th.
|
Rank
|
NCAA Division II
|
Total
|
Record
|
Last Week
|
|
1
|
Le Moyne (22)
|
497
|
0-0
|
1
|
|
2
|
Tampa (3)
|
473
|
0-0
|
2
|
|
3
|
Mercyhurst
|
445
|
0-0
|
3
|
|
4
|
Seton Hill
|
408
|
0-0
|
4
|
|
5
|
Limestone
|
383
|
2-0
|
5
|
|
6
|
Adelphi
|
359
|
0-0
|
6
|
|
7
|
Lenoir-Rhyne
|
321
|
2-1
|
8
|
|
8
|
Mercy
|
319
|
0-0
|
7
|
|
9
|
Mount Olive
|
278
|
3-0
|
15
|
|
10
|
Indianapolis
|
249
|
1-0
|
9
|
|
11
|
Wingate
|
242
|
2-0
|
13
|
|
12
|
Pace
|
232
|
0-0
|
10
|
|
13
|
Lindenwood
|
220
|
2-0
|
11
|
|
14
|
Rockhurst
|
157
|
2-0
|
17
|
|
15
|
Queens
|
129
|
0-1
|
12
|
|
16
|
Colorado Mesa
|
95
|
0-0
|
18
|
|
17
|
Belmont Abbey
|
83
|
0-2
|
13
|
|
18
|
Catawba
|
79
|
1-1
|
16
|
|
19
|
Saint Anselm
|
68
|
0-0
|
19
|
|
20
|
Florida Southern
|
51
|
0-0
|
20
|
Bulldogs jump to number six in USILA rankings
Story Links
Louisville, Ky.
—-The Wingate University Bulldogs made a big jump in this week’s poll, moving up five spots to number six in the NCAA Division II USILA top 20 poll, which was released Monday afternoon. The Bulldogs are 3-0 on the season, coming off a convincing 12-3 victory at previously fifth-ranked Limestone. Wingate has now been ranked in every USILA poll since the start of the 2019 season. The Bulldogs crack the top 10 for the first time since the end of the 2019 season, when Wingate won its third straight SAC Tournament title to check in at #10.
Wingate was ranked 15th in the preseason poll, then jumped to 13 after the 20-3 victory over Barton in the season opener. The ‘Dogs moved up to #11 after taking down Montevallo 21-9 last Saturday.
Saturday’s 12-3 victory at Limestone was the biggest loss for the perennial national powers since the 2006 national semifinals. The three goals also tie a program low, which was also set in that contest 15 years ago. Wingate blanked the Saints in the second half, while out-shooting Limestone 48-24 on the day.
The Bulldogs rank among the nation’s best in several categories. Wingate leads the nation in assists, ranking second in assists per game and points per game. Wingate is fourth nationally in scoring offense, scoring defense and scoring margin. The Bulldogs are averaging 17.67 goals per game, while holding opponents to five goals per contest.
Adam Vodovnik leads the SAC and ranks third in the nation with 5.67 goals per game. Willie Grieco is second nationally with 5.33 assists per game and 8.00 points per game, leading the SAC in both categories with Vodovnik ranking sixth in the nation in points per game. Edward Erickson leads the nation with a 3.25 goals-against average, ranking second in the nation with a .714 save percentage. Noah Ehinger is sixth in the country in face-off winning percentage.
After starting the season as the fourth-highest ranked SAC team in the USILA rankings, Wingate is now the highest-ranked team from the conference, one spot ahead of seventh-ranked Lenoir-Rhyne.
Limestone dropped from fifth to 12th after the Wingate setback, while Queens checks in at #14.
Wingate is back in action Saturday, hosting Coker at 3 p.m. The Bulldogs travel to Charlotte to face the 14th-ranked Royals Wednesday, March 10 at 7 p.m. The ‘Dogs have a trip to Lenoir-Rhyne April 7, followed by a home game against #8 Mount Olive April 13.
WINGATE UNIVERSITY
Founded in 1896, Wingate University is a laboratory of difference-making that serves more than 3,600 students in North Carolina. Wingate offers 36 undergraduate majors as well as six master’s and four doctoral programs. The University is home to the Cannon College of Arts and Sciences; the Levine College of Health Sciences; the Byrum School of Business; and the College of Professional Studies, which includes the Thayer School of Education and the School of Sport Sciences.
Wingate is the leading healthcare education provider in western North Carolina, and nearly one in five Wingate undergraduate students is preparing to be a pharmacist, physician assistant, physical therapist, occupational therapist or nurse.
Athletes on Wingate’s 23 teams compete in NCAA Division II and have brought home the SAC Echols Athletic Excellence Award for 13 years straight. The University’s motto is “Faith, Knowledge, Service.” View current news and videos at www.wingate.edu.
90,000 Analytical company “Expert Business Solutions” with the support of “Expert RA” announces the launch of a pilot non-credit rating “Market power of registrars” Share Facebook Twitter VK
Moscow, September 28, 2021
The Analytical Company “Expert Business Solutions” invites Russian companies licensed to maintain a register of securities holders to take part in the pilot rating “The Market Power of Registrars”.
The rating is intended to become a convenient and transparent tool for assessing the key characteristics of the activities of Russian registrar companies, the aggregate of which reflects the market potential and competitiveness of the registrar, and also demonstrates the structure of the market and its quality in general.
The rating methodology was developed based on the experience and qualifications of the Expert RA credit rating agency in the creation of credit and non-credit ratings. The rating assumes an assessment of such aspects of the activities of registrar companies, such as the client base, financial stability of the registrar, territorial coverage and human resources, the volume of basic registrar services, as well as the range of additional services and services. The main one for assessing the factors and sub-factors used in the methodology is public information from official data sources (the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the Federal Tax Service, etc.).and information provided by the registrar companies as part of the survey.
The rating is planned to be updated regularly on an annual and semi-annual basis. The pilot rating will be based on data at the end of 2020 and the first half of 2021.
More details on the rating can be found in the methodology.
We invite Russian registrar companies to take part in the rating.
Download the form to fill out.
Send a questionnaire and contact on all rating issues:
Klaz Arseniy
Analyst
“Expert Business Solutions”
Tel: +7 (495) 225-34-44, ext. 3481
[email protected]
HORSE POWER TOP 10 OILS FORMULA BOTTOM OF OILS FOR GROWTH AND DEEP RESTORATION OF HAIR 100ML
Regular use strengthens the hair follicle and stimulates hair growth, making the hair thicker, thicker, and also makes the hair more elastic, less prone to breakage during styling, with an even structure and a healthy, beautiful shine.
Silagor (Power of the Mountains) (Russia / Altai Territory / Altai / Katun settlement).
Rating of hotels in the world
DISCLAIMER
By using the services offered by www.tophotels.ru, you express
your agreement to the Terms of Use of the resource.
By using the services offered by www.tophotels.ru, you accept the terms
of the following Agreement on the terms of use of the resource , outside
depending on whether you are a “Guest” (which implies simple use of
You service) or “Registered User” (which implies registration on
Internet resource www.tophotels.ru), as well as, regardless of the purpose and subject
use.
TERMS OF USE RESOURCE
as amended on December 29, 2014
1.
Terms and definitions
Agreement – Terms and Conditions Agreement
use of the resource www.tophotels.ru.
Administrator – administrators, moderators, copyright holders, and
other legal owners of the www.tophotels.ru resource.
Resource (Service) – website www.tophotels.ru.
Materials – information posted on the resource: texts, articles,
photographic images, video images, illustrations.
User is a specific person or organization that visits
internet resource www.tophotels.ru.
Depending on the purpose and subject of the resource use
distinguish between types of Users:
1. Regular Users – individuals, most often tourists, as well as persons,
planning their vacation, visiting the resource for personal purposes, without pursuing opportunities
making a profit.
2. Commercial users – legal entities, individual entrepreneurs, and
also their representatives or other persons acting in the interests of the above
subjects visiting the resource in connection with their professional activities, pursuing
commercial purposes.Commercial users in the text of this Agreement include
including, but not limited to, the following Users – travel agencies, tour operators,
hotels, tourist search and information systems and other subjects of tourist
businesses, as well as persons acting in their interests.
2. General
2.1.A prerequisite for using the service
www.tophotels.ru is the User’s consent to act in full compliance with
all applicable legal norms of the Russian Federation and the norms of international law, as well as in
compliance with this Agreement.
2.2 Site administrators can change this Agreement at any time. Any changes
of this Agreement shall enter into force from the moment of their publication on the website www.tophotels.ru.
By continuing to use the www.tophotels.ru service after the publication of changes, you
agree to act in accordance with the terms specified in the modified
Agreement.
2.3. Administrators of the resource (including hotels cooperating with the resource) have the right to send
User useful, relevant, interesting and other information by sending
e-mail and posting in your personal account.At any time, Users can
unsubscribe from mailings through your personal account.
2.4 Visiting and using a resource means that
The user accepts all the terms of this Agreement in full without
any exemptions and restrictions.
The use of the resource on other terms is not
allowed.
2.5. In view of the fact that an active link to the Agreement is posted on the main page of the resource and
is available to an indefinite circle of persons, the Agreement is considered concluded with a specific
By the User from the moment this User visits the resource, even though
lack of registration of the User on the resource.
3. Resource Description
3.1.www.tophotels.ru is an informational rating of hotels
and hotels of the world, based on the opinions and feedback of tourism professionals
(travel agents) and tourists.
3.2. This resource is a daily updated catalog of hotels and hotels
the world, which includes descriptions of hotels, their photos and contacts.
On our resource
every person who has visited a hotel can leave a review about it,
evaluate the accommodation, the level of service and food in the hotel, additionally arguing their
ratings in the review, thus forming the TOP Hotels rating.
3.3 In addition to general information about hotels, users can find on www.tophotels.ru a number of
additional materials and services that may be useful when choosing a place
recreation. These include information about special promotions, hotel news and
other related information.
3.4. www.tophotels.ru, as well as the copyright holder of this resource is not
travel agency and does not sell travel services.
4.
Intellectual property.
Resource Usage Limits
General restrictions , regardless of type
User
4.1. All materials on the resource www.tophotels.ru, including, without limitation, any
documentation, text, content, data, graphics, interfaces or others
materials subject to copyright law are protected
federal and international legislation.Site materials may contain trade
brands, service marks and trade names (names). All rights reserved.
4.2. Information posted by Administrators on the resource: texts, articles,
photo images, video images, illustrations are the property of the copyright holder
resource or its partners, with the exception of materials whose authorship is agreed
directly in their content (articles, texts, photographs and illustrations) or
information uploaded by Users.
4.3. Use of information (textual, graphic, audiovisual and other),
posted on the Site can only be carried out subject to the requirements
the current legislation of the Russian Federation on copyright and intellectual property, and
See also this Agreement.
4.4 Design, structure of the Site, image, graphics and other elements that are the object
protection under the legislation of the Russian Federation, cannot be reproduced in whole or in part
to create new information objects , except for cases
contractual or partnership relations with the Administrators of the resource, while the conditions
reproductions are negotiated in each case individually.
4.5 Certain portions of this resource may be password protected and may require
registration of a user who wants to view them.
After the registration process on our
the site, the User at no cost, unless otherwise agreed separately,
an account and password are provided to allow access to all services and
services www.tophotels.ru. The user undertakes to maintain confidentiality
password, and is solely responsible for any damage and any liabilities that become
consequence of the failure to maintain the confidentiality of the password.
4.6. The user agrees not to use www.tophotels.ru for:
– download materials that do not comply with applicable law, which are
harmful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, vulgar or
indecent;
– in order to impersonate another person or organization, including but not
limited to official representatives www.
tophotels.ru or travel providers
services, as well as in order to reflect a non-existent relationship between you and others
persons or organizations;
– downloads, mailings, or any other form of publication of materials that you do not have
publishing rights;
– downloads, mailings, or any other form of publication, unsolicited or prohibited
advertisements, promotional materials, spam, and any other advertising materials;
– downloads, mailings, or any other form of publication of materials containing
computer viruses or any other program codes, files or programs created with
the purpose of interrupting, eliminating or limiting the functionality of any software
software or hardware;
– obstructing or interrupting the functioning of the Service, or servers and networks,
associated with the resource.
4.7. The user of the resource undertakes:
– do not redesign, do not try to get access to the source code, do not distribute
and not create any derivative works based on the use of the Resource or
any of its parts;
– do not enter the Resource in any way other than the one provided
www.tophotels.ru interface. In addition to this, any software access
to which is provided on this site, including but not limited to all HTML
codes and online controls are the property of the administrators.Any
reproduction or distribution of this software is strictly
forbidden.
4.8 The administrator of the resource may, at its sole discretion and without prior notice
prohibit / restrict the User’s use of the resource.
The reasons for these measures may
include, but are not limited to the following:
– violations of these Terms of Use or other agreements with the administration
www.tophotels.ru;
– relevant requests from law enforcement or other government agencies;
– Unexpected technical or system problems occur
security;
– participation of the User in fraudulent or illegal transactions, and / or non-payment
any sums of money charged for the provision of services related to the Service.
Resource Usage Limits for Regular User:
4.9.www.tophotels.ru provides free services designed for personal
non-commercial use. The user is not allowed to use this site for
making a profit, with the exception of contractual relations with the Administrator of the resource;
4.
10 Unless otherwise stated on the website, this Agreement permits the Usual
the user to view, download, cache, copy and print the Materials,
in accordance with the following conditions:
– Any copy of the Materials or a separate part of them must contain a link to the page
resource www.tophotels.ru containing the copied information;
– The general user is given a limited, non-exclusive right to create
hypertext links to the main and internal pages of the resource, with the condition that
such a link does not lead to a false, derogatory, deceptive perception of the service
www.tophotels.ru.
At the same time, www.tophotels.ru reserves the right to cancel the above
permission at any time, without giving reasons, as a result of which any use
Submissions must be terminated immediately upon appropriate notice
Administrator.
Resource Usage Restrictions for Commercial
user:
4.11. Commercial user is not allowed to download, cache, copy and
print Materials from the site without obtaining a prior written agreement
Site administrator
4.12. A commercial user is allowed to post links only to the full version
Resource, home page www.tophotels.ru.
4.13 The commercial user is not allowed to link to internal pages.
www.tophotels.ru, including special links with the ending “? _mode -“, regardless of the purpose
their placement.
4.14. The commercial user is not allowed to use any of the trademarks,
logos or trade names from the resource, as well as any other copyright
information, including graphics, as well as any text, or interface / design
any page or any form contained on a page of the Site without receiving
preliminary written agreement of the Site Administrator.
5. Materials transferred (placed)
By the user for publication and / or distribution through
www.tophotels.ru
5.1. The user guarantees that all information posted
im, is genuine. Responsibility for indicating unreliable, false, erroneous
information lies with the User.
5.2 The user is responsible for legality, compliance with the real situation
cases, relevance to the context, originality and authorship of any of the posted
materials.
5.3 The moderator has the right to make corrections to comments and reviews with errors or
profanity. Comments and reviews containing advertisements or any other
commercial offers will be removed from the site.
Active or inactive
links used in comments will be cut in most cases.
The administrator / moderator of the project has the right to delete reviews / comments / photos uploaded
users without explanation.
5.4. The copyright holder of the site www.tophotels.ru does not extend its copyright to
materials available on the resource (including photographs and graphic elements) published
By the user.However, by publishing such materials on the resource, the User transfers
www.tophotels.ru an international, non-exclusive and royalty-free license (permission) for
use, distribution, adaptation and publication of these materials for the purpose of
descriptions and advertisements of the hotel or service being described.
Permit validity period
ends when the User or the administration www.tophotels.ru removes data
materials from the pages of the site.
5.5. The administration of the resource is not responsible for the correctness of the
feedback and comments information. www.tophotels.ru does not provide control over materials,
published by Users on the resource, and, as a result, does not guarantee the accuracy,
the integrity or quality of these materials.The user must independently evaluate
potential risk and take full responsibility for the use of any materials,
including confidence in their accuracy, completeness and usefulness.
5.6 Administrators may or may not review materials before they
publication. Www.
tophotels.ru representatives have the right (but not the obligation) to track,
reject or transfer any materials available through the Service.
5.7. Users are FORBIDDEN to post any materials on the resource, distribute
which is prohibited by the current legislation of the Russian Federation and / or regulations
international law. The user is responsible for the inconsistency of the content
advertising and information materials, the current legislation of the Russian Federation, including,
the norms of federal laws “On Advertising”, “On the Mass Media”, “On Copyright
law and related rights “,” On trademarks, service marks and names of places
origin of goods “.The user guarantees that the materials published by him are not
are inappropriate advertising and do not violate privacy,
personal and family secrets, other legally protected rights and interests of third parties.
6. Limitation of Liability
6.1 Site administrators make every reasonable effort to
ensuring the correctness of all information posted on the Site.However, not
guarantee the absolute accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained in
The site is not responsible for inaccuracies, possible errors or other shortcomings in the posted
information.
6.2. Assessment of the quality of information posted on the Site, its relevance, completeness and
applicability – in the jurisdiction and competence of the User.
6.3.www.tophotels.ru does not provide any guarantees. Information and services,
offered on the site may be inaccurate, as most of this information
provided directly by service providers.
6.4. Administrators do not guarantee that:
– the service will meet your requirements;
– the results obtained during the use of the service will be accurate or
reliable;
– the quality of any services, information, or other materials purchased by you using
resource will meet your requirements.
6.5 The hotel ratings displayed on this website may only be used by
as general guidelines.
6.6. Administrators of www.tophotels.ru and / or third parties working with it may make
changes to the information on this site at any time. 90 021 6.7. Www.tophotels.ru partners, including, without limitation, hotels, travel agencies
and tour operators providing travel or any other services
through the service www.tophotels.ru are not agents or representatives
www.
tophotels.ru.
6.8. www.tophotels.ru is not responsible for actions, errors, promises, guarantees
their partners or third parties posting information on the resource, as well as for violations
or their failure to comply with contracts, as well as for any material, moral direct or
consequential damage, or any other loss arising from the above.
6.9 Site administrators cannot be held responsible for any direct, indirect
loss associated with the use of this site, or with the delay or impossibility of it
use, as well as for any information, products and services purchased through
of this site, or otherwise obtained with its help.
6.10 This site contains hyperlinks to Internet resources operated by persons not
related to www.tophotels.
ru. These hyperlinks are published exclusively in
informational and educational purposes. The administrator has no control over these
Internet resources and is not responsible for their content and use of this
content by Users.
6.11. The user is responsible for claims and claims of third parties to
to the site administrators and personally to the User for violations caused by the posting
information materials.
6.12. Resource administrators are not responsible for temporary technical failures and
interruptions in the provision of services, for temporary interruptions and interruptions in the operation of communication lines, other
similar failures, as well as for malfunctions of the computer from which the User performs
Internet access.
7. Settlement of disputes and applicable
legal norm
7.1.In case of publication of materials contained on the pages
site, without observing the conditions set forth in this Agreement, the administrators
reserve the right to defend their violated rights in accordance with the applicable
civil law and copyright law and related
rights.
7.2. Upon detection of violations of the terms of this Agreement, the Administrator
sends the “violator” a pre-trial notification with the requirement to eliminate the identified
violations in due time.In case of non-fulfillment of the specified requirements, the protection of the violated
rights and recovery of the caused losses are carried out in court at the place
registration of the copyright holder of the Website www.
tophotels.ru
7.3. Any legal proceedings under this Agreement will be conducted in the Russian
Federation in Moscow, in accordance with the jurisdiction of the courts of the judicial system in the Russian Federation and
the terms of this Agreement.
8. Final Provisions
8.1. If you do not agree with the Terms of Use, or
any part of them, please refrain from using the resource
www.tophotels.ru.
Resource administrators
www.tophotels.ru
Read completely at https://www.tophotels.ru/about/agreement
“Youth of the ONF” forms the rating of values of the inhabitants of Russia “What is the strength?”
“Youth of the ONF” launched the all-Russian action “What is the power?”Street and online polls will run until October 30.
The main goal of the action is to form a rating of the values of the country’s inhabitants. To do this, the members of the “ONF Youth” ask people of different ages and professions a question from the popular films “Brother” and “Brother-2”. To the simple question “What is the strength?” have already answered in the Rostov, Leningrad, Moscow region, Krasnodar Territory and the Republic of Tatarstan.
In Moscow, the action was held at the wall in memory of Viktor Tsoi on the Arbat.
“Strength in honor, dignity and conscience.Nowadays, many are obsessed with money. During my life I have traveled many places and realized that this is not the case everywhere. For example, people from Siberian cities surprised me with their character. Honor lives in Russia, ”says Konstantin, a Muscovite .
The survey participants wrote their answers with colored markers on canvas. Most adolescents and young adults aged 12-17 said that power is in knowledge, friendship and communication.:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/21828917/160_083120.png)
Slightly older respondents – from 18 to 25 believe that the main thing in life is love and honesty.People aged 25-45 see strength in truth, self-development, justice and faith. The respondents over 45 named family and health as the main values.
If we talk about the strength of the elderly, then in their answer most often sounded – nature, family, children, homeland.
“Strength in life, in nature, in communication with people. Each person has a certain place where he always returns with his thoughts. For example, I spent all my childhood with my grandmother in the village. There were birches higher than a five-story building, wooden houses, blue flax fields, rye with cornflowers.This is my place of power, and the memories of it are my strength, “says Natalia Bazhenova, a resident of Krasnodar, .
In Krasnodar, the survey was held in the Botanical Garden named after I.S. Kosenko. And in the Leningrad region – at the walls of the Vyborg castle in Vyborg.
“For many of my fellow countrymen, the native walls of the Vyborg castle are a place of power. Therefore, we decided to conduct a survey here. Today the residents of the region were asked what is their strength. We want to find out and show what unites our big, strong and friendly country, “says member of the ONF Youth team in the Leningrad region Sergey Ivaschenko.
Later, on the basis of the analyzed data, a rating of values will be compiled and published.
“These polls are very much needed today. It is interesting to know what youth breathes and what is their strength. I would like to believe that in them it manifests itself in such good qualities as love, friendship, happiness, understanding, compassion. I would also look at the answers of the older generation, ”says 90,075 a resident of St. Petersburg.
In Rostov, the poll took place on the central streets of the city.On the first day of the action 120 people told about their strength to the ONF Youth.
The most common answers are truth and love. And in Kazan, most people believe that strength lies in loyalty, kindness, decency and honesty.
As part of the action, residents of all regions of the country will tell about their strength. Upon its completion, “Youth of the ONF” will compile a rating of responses for each constituent entity and the country as a whole. And the most popular of them will be placed by the team members on the main banners, which are planned to be installed on the central streets of Russian cities in November.
90,000 Russian “soft power”: global rating
Russia took 13th place in the ranking of countries in the world in terms of “soft power” at the end of 2020. About it
said in a report from Brand Finance. Germany became the leader of the list, Japan took the second place, Great Britain took the third place. At the same time, the United States, which in 2020 were the first in this indicator, this time was on the sixth line.
The term “soft power” was first coined by Harvard professor Joseph Nye in 1990.He argued that there is an alternative foreign policy method for states, which helps to achieve the desired results based on the attractiveness of their own culture and values, as well as through cooperation in certain areas, aimed at persuading and forming a positive perception. At the same time, “soft power” does not imply the use of military and economic means as the main method of achieving its goals.
Brand Finance experts gave the following definition of “soft power” – “the ability of a nation to influence the preferences and behavior of various individuals in the international arena (states, corporations, society, etc.)through attractiveness and persuasion, not the use of force. ” When compiling a rating, countries are assessed according to several key elements that affect the recognition and reputation of a nation: business and trade, order, international relations, culture and heritage, media and communications, education and science, people and values.
In addition, this year, another indicator was added to them – how the country coped with the coronavirus pandemic.
Brand Finance surveyed 75 thousand people from 100 countries to find out how a particular country is estimated in the world.At the same time, when compiling the rating, statistical data were taken into account, as well as interviews with experts, politicians, journalists, economists, etc. – up to 62.2 out of 100. The country is leading in the following indicators: international relations, order, business and trade. Angela Merkel has served as Chancellor since 2005, but despite this, survey participants consider her one of the most respected leaders.At the same time, it is believed that Germany was successfully able to cope with COVID-19 and helped to resolve the problems with the UK’s exit from the EU. In the field of education and science, the country took 3rd place in the world. Here Japan and the USA were ahead of her. At the same time, Germany was able to improve the scores on this indicator thanks to the BioNTech / Pfizer vaccine.
“Her long tenure at the helm has provided Germany with strength and stability against a backdrop of unpredictable and volatile partners, especially in the face of turmoil, as the threat of the collapse of the European single market increases with the UK leaving the EU,” the report said.
At the same time, the United States lost its leading position in the soft power index over the year. Due to a stormy election campaign and a haphazard reaction to COVID-19, the country dropped from first to sixth place with a total score of 55.9 out of 100. Thus, in the fight against the pandemic, the United States took 105th place. This is the worst performance in the index. In addition, the wave of Black Lives Matter protests in the summer of 2020 and the death of George Floyd have negatively impacted the country’s human rights record.
The indicators of China (54.3) and Russia (50.5) slightly decreased.Russia dropped from 10th to 13th place, China remained in eighth. At the same time, both countries have made significant scientific advances in developing their own vaccines against coronavirus and improved indicators for the Education and Science component.
The fall in China’s rating was influenced by the pandemic, as it is believed that the coronavirus was first detected in Wuhan, protests in Hong Kong, deteriorating relations with Taiwan, and human rights violations in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. As for Russia, the decline in its rating was facilitated by the deterioration of relations with many Western countries, as well as small state support to the population in connection with the crisis and pandemic.
The authors of the study note that Russia has enormous potential, and in the near future the country may improve its performance and rise to sixth place in the ranking. Thus, public opinion signals a change in ideas about what global power is and implies a weakening of the influence of Western countries (primarily the United States) on the world arena. Notably, Gen Z respondents (people who were born between 1997 and 2012) and millennials (born between 1981 and 1996) tend to rate the reputation of countries like Russia, Turkey, and the Philippines higher than the older generation.
For example, Germans and Brazilians (representatives of Generation Z) positively assess the reputation of Russia. And this is the general picture for many Western countries.
90,000 Why do you need strength and rating?
Why rating, strength and science?
– a user’s rating above +100 makes it possible to rate posts, comments, and also rate other users.
– by voting for entries, you can display them on the main page. Any moderator-approved smartlab entry that reaches +15 goes to the main page
– if your rating is higher than +5, then the title of any of your posts goes to the main page after publication – thus, more participants will read it.
– the rating takes you to a higher place in the list of traders
– rating allows you to write to more sections
– the POWER indicator determines the strength of the trader’s voice. The greater the power, the more the rating of the participant you are voting for changes.
– A rating below -3 removes your post titles from the All Blogs section.
This is done in order to remove spammers and flooders and not to clog the feed.
– rating below -5 removes all user comments.This measure is directed against those who repeatedly write nasty things in the comments.
How is rating, strength and science formed?
– voting for a comment affects the size of the “Force”
– voting for the entry affects the “Rating” and “Strength”
– voting for the user has a greater impact on the “Rating” and “Strength”
– publications and edits of articles of the financial dictionary add a rating “Science” More details
How to earn a rating ?
– writing interesting posts to your blog is the fastest way to gain respect and authority on smartlab, as well as raise your
rating
– once a week, the site administrator checks all users for adequacy and distributes an initial rating of +5 to everyone who wrote interesting posts and showed themselves as a normal decent person
Rules and guidelines :
– Don’t abuse your rating.
Try to give your assessments as objectively as possible.
– Try to refrain from setting minuses. Cons often offend people and suppress their creative enthusiasm. If you don’t like someone’s opinion, just ignore the post and don’t rate it.
– Feel free to put downsides if the post does not correspond to our topic, if it contains swearing and insults, or advertising some useless service, or just spam
– Users caught in biased mass exposure of minuses will be deprived of their rating by the admin.
2
5-7.9
2-20.7
