Pocono Highland Camps: A Legal Case Study on Workplace Accidents and Compensation

What was the Barrick v. Pocono Highland Camp case about. How did the Pennsylvania Superior Court rule on this workmen’s compensation case. What factors were considered in determining if the accident occurred in the course of employment.

The Barrick v. Pocono Highland Camp Case: An Overview

The Barrick v. Pocono Highland Camp case was a landmark workmen’s compensation case heard by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in 1966. It centered around a tragic accident that occurred at a boys’ summer camp in Monroe County, Pennsylvania. The case raised important questions about employer liability and the scope of workplace accidents covered under compensation laws.

Key Facts of the Case

• The incident occurred on September 13, 1960, after the camp’s regular summer season had ended
• The deceased, Mr. Barrick, was a maintenance worker at the camp
• Barrick died in a fire that broke out around 2:00 AM in the camp’s administration building
• At the time, employees were living on-site and doing post-season cleanup work
• There was conflicting testimony about whether Barrick was required to be on the premises at night

Legal Context: The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act

The case was evaluated under Section 301(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915. This law defined compensable injuries as those occurring “in the course of employment” and included injuries “caused by the condition of the premises” when an employee’s presence was “required by the nature of his employment.”

How does the Act define injuries eligible for compensation? The Act covers injuries that occur:
1. On premises occupied or controlled by the employer
2. Where the employee’s presence is required for work

Conflicting Testimony: Was Barrick Required to Be On-Site?

A crucial aspect of the case was determining whether Barrick was required to be on the camp premises at the time of the fire. Witness testimony on this point was inconsistent:

Testimony Supporting Barrick’s Required Presence

• Alex Washeleski (fellow employee) initially stated workers were required to remain on premises and were subject to call “at any time of the day”
• Andrew Dippre (foreman) testified that if there was a need for cleaning or maintenance after 4:30 PM, Barrick would have worked those hours

Testimony Against Barrick’s Required Presence

• Washeleski later stated on cross-examination that after clocking out, Barrick was free to go where he pleased until 8 AM the next day
• Dippre also testified that Barrick was not required to be at the camp at night and could go wherever he wanted
• Earl Weinberg (camp owner) stated Barrick was not required to live at the camp and was not on call at any time
• Raymond Jacobs (fellow employee) corroborated that they were not required to be back at camp until 8 AM the following morning

The Legal Process: From Referee to Superior Court

The case went through several stages of review before reaching the Superior Court:

1. A referee initially made an award in favor of the claimant (Barrick’s estate)
2. The Workmen’s Compensation Board, as the ultimate fact-finding body, vacated the award and dismissed the claim
3. The case was then appealed to the Pennsylvania Superior Court

Why did the Workmen’s Compensation Board overturn the referee’s decision? While the board did not disturb the referee’s six findings of fact, it added two additional findings and substituted a different conclusion of law, ultimately deciding against compensation.

Legal Principles Guiding the Superior Court’s Review

The Superior Court’s review of the case was guided by several established legal principles:

• When compensation authorities refuse to find facts in favor of the party with the burden of proof, the review question is not whether evidence could sustain such a finding
• Instead, the court must determine if the board’s findings are consistent with each other and its legal conclusions
• The court also evaluates if findings can be sustained without a capricious disregard of competent evidence
• While the board is the ultimate arbiter of facts, appellate courts can review questions of law and how law is applied to facts
• If facts permit only one legitimate inference, the question becomes one of law

The Significance of “Course of Employment” in Compensation Cases

A central issue in the Barrick case was determining whether the accident occurred “in the course of employment.” This concept is crucial in workmen’s compensation cases.

What factors are considered when determining if an accident occurred in the course of employment?

• Whether the employee was on the employer’s premises
• If the employee’s presence was required by the nature of their work
• Whether the employee was engaged in the furtherance of the employer’s business or affairs
• The timing of the accident in relation to regular work hours
• Any special circumstances that might extend the course of employment beyond normal boundaries

Implications of the Barrick Case for Future Compensation Claims

The Barrick v. Pocono Highland Camp case had several important implications for future workmen’s compensation claims:

1. It highlighted the importance of clear employer policies regarding on-call status and required presence on premises
2. The case underscored the need for consistent and clear communication between employers and employees about job expectations
3. It demonstrated the complexities involved in determining the “course of employment” in non-traditional work settings like seasonal camps
4. The case emphasized the weight given to the Workmen’s Compensation Board’s findings in appellate review
5. It illustrated the fine line between personal time and work time for employees who live on their employer’s premises

Broader Legal Context: Similar Cases and Precedents

The Barrick case did not occur in isolation. It was part of a broader legal landscape dealing with workmen’s compensation issues. Some related cases and precedents include:

• Newman v. Congregation of Mercy and Truth (1961): Established principles for reviewing compensation authorities’ decisions
• Dandy v. Glaze (1961): Further refined the standard of review for workmen’s compensation cases
• Ede v. Ruhe Motor Corp. (1957): Clarified the scope of appellate review in compensation cases

How do these cases relate to Barrick v. Pocono Highland Camp? They collectively established the legal framework within which the Superior Court approached the Barrick case, particularly regarding the review of factual findings and legal conclusions made by lower authorities.

The Evolution of Workmen’s Compensation Laws

The Barrick case is also significant in the context of the evolving nature of workmen’s compensation laws in Pennsylvania and across the United States. These laws have undergone significant changes since their inception in the early 20th century.

What major changes have occurred in workmen’s compensation laws since the Barrick case?

• Expansion of coverage to include more types of workers and industries
• Increased focus on workplace safety and accident prevention
• Development of more comprehensive definitions of work-related injuries and illnesses
• Changes in how compensation is calculated and awarded
• Introduction of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to handle claims

The Barrick case, while specific to its time and circumstances, contributed to the ongoing dialogue about the scope and application of these important laws.

Lessons for Employers and Employees

The Barrick v. Pocono Highland Camp case offers valuable lessons for both employers and employees in various industries, particularly those with non-traditional work arrangements:

For Employers

• Clearly define and communicate expectations regarding on-call status and required presence on premises
• Maintain accurate records of work schedules and employee locations
• Regularly review and update workplace safety policies, especially for employees living on-site
• Ensure consistent application of policies across all employees
• Consider the potential liability implications of providing housing for employees

For Employees

• Understand your rights and responsibilities under workmen’s compensation laws
• Seek clarification on your employment status, particularly regarding on-call expectations
• Document any instructions or expectations communicated by your employer
• Be aware of the potential gray areas in determining “course of employment” in non-traditional work settings
• Familiarize yourself with your employer’s safety policies and emergency procedures

How can both employers and employees use the lessons from the Barrick case to improve workplace safety and clarity? By fostering open communication, maintaining clear documentation, and staying informed about relevant laws and regulations, both parties can work towards creating safer and more transparent work environments.

The Role of Expert Testimony in Workmen’s Compensation Cases

While not explicitly mentioned in the Barrick case summary, expert testimony often plays a crucial role in workmen’s compensation cases. This aspect is worth exploring to provide a more comprehensive understanding of how these cases are typically adjudicated.

Types of Expert Witnesses

In workmen’s compensation cases, various types of expert witnesses may be called upon:

• Medical experts to testify about the nature and extent of injuries
• Occupational safety experts to provide insight on workplace conditions
• Vocational rehabilitation specialists to assess the impact of injuries on future employment prospects
• Economic experts to calculate potential lost wages and benefits

The Weight of Expert Testimony

How do compensation authorities and courts typically view expert testimony? While expert opinions are given serious consideration, they are not automatically accepted as fact. Factors that influence the weight given to expert testimony include:

• The expert’s qualifications and experience
• The methodology used to form their opinion
• The consistency of their testimony with other evidence
• The expert’s ability to withstand cross-examination

In cases like Barrick v. Pocono Highland Camp, expert testimony could have played a role in clarifying industry standards for employee housing and on-call expectations in seasonal camp settings.

The Impact of Technology on Modern Workmen’s Compensation Cases

While the Barrick case occurred in 1960, it’s important to consider how technological advancements have impacted similar cases in the modern era. Technology has significantly changed the landscape of workmen’s compensation claims and their adjudication.

Technological Advancements Affecting Workmen’s Compensation

• GPS and mobile technology allowing for more accurate tracking of employee locations and work hours
• Advanced security systems providing better evidence in cases involving workplace accidents
• Telemedicine facilitating quicker and more accessible medical evaluations for injured workers
• Big data analytics helping to identify patterns in workplace injuries and improve prevention strategies
• Online claim filing systems streamlining the compensation process

How has technology changed the way workmen’s compensation cases are handled compared to the time of the Barrick case? Modern technology has generally made it easier to gather and present evidence, streamline the claims process, and implement more effective safety measures. However, it has also raised new questions about privacy and the boundaries of the workplace, especially with the rise of remote work.

International Perspectives on Workplace Accident Compensation

While the Barrick case focused on Pennsylvania law, it’s valuable to consider how different countries approach workplace accident compensation. This global perspective can provide insights into alternative systems and potential areas for improvement in U.S. laws.

Comparison of International Approaches

• Germany: Known for its comprehensive social insurance system, including statutory accident insurance
• United Kingdom: Operates a no-fault system with benefits provided through national insurance
• Australia: Uses a hybrid system with both public and private insurers
• Canada: Each province has its own workers’ compensation board, similar to the U.S. state-based system
• Japan: Provides universal coverage through government-managed workers’ accident compensation insurance

What can the U.S. learn from international approaches to workplace accident compensation? While each system has its strengths and weaknesses, studying international models can provide valuable insights into alternative ways of balancing employer liability, employee protection, and economic efficiency.

In conclusion, the Barrick v. Pocono Highland Camp case, while specific to its time and place, touches on universal themes in workplace safety and compensation law. It highlights the complexities involved in determining employer liability, especially in non-traditional work settings. As workplace norms continue to evolve, particularly in the wake of technological advancements and changing work arrangements, the principles discussed in this case remain relevant. By studying such cases and considering them in a broader context, we can work towards creating safer workplaces and fairer compensation systems for all employees.

: 1966 :: Pennsylvania Superior Court Decisions :: Pennsylvania Case Law :: Pennsylvania Law :: US Law :: Justia

208 Pa. Superior Ct. 72 (1966)

Barrick, Appellant,
v.
Pocono Highland Camp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 14, 1966.

June 17, 1966.

Before ERVIN, P.J., WRIGHT, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, and SPAULDING, JJ.

*73 Harry B. Goldberg, with him Ronald M. Katzman, and Goldberg, Evans & Katzman, for appellant.

Christian S. Erb, Jr., with him Metzger, Wickersham & Knauss, for appellee.

OPINION BY ERVIN, P.J., June 17, 1966:

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The facts as stated in the opinion of Judge SHELLEY of the court below are as follows: “It appears that the decedent was a maintenance worker at Pocono Highland Camp in Monroe County, Pennsylvania. This was a boys’ camp that operated during the months of July and August of 1960. During the season, employees were paid a weekly wage, together with food and board. At the time of the accident on September 13, 1960, the camp season had ended. The employees were living in the administration building and purchased their food at a local grocery store. They continued at the same wage and did clean up work. The employees, including the decedent, quit work on September 12, 1960 at about 10:00 a.m. because of inclement weather. The decedent left the camp, went to town on personal business and, although there is not a complete accounting of his time, it is conceded that he did not work again for his employer. He returned to his room in the administration building about midnight. A fire broke out about 2:00 a.m., which resulted in the decedent’s death from asphyxiation.”

There was a conflict of evidence as to whether or not the decedent was required to be on the premises at the time of the fire. On the one hand, Alex Washeleski, a fellow-employe, testified on direct examination that they are required to remain on the premises and were *74 subject to call “at any time of the day. ” On cross-examination, however, he testified that after punching out the time clock Barrick was not due back to work until 8 a.m. the next morning and that he was free to go where he pleased. Andrew Dippre, the foreman, testified that the decedent slept at the camp but that he was not required to be there at night, could go wherever he wanted and was not on call at night. On the other hand, he testified that if there was a need for cleaning up or maintenance after 4:30 p.m., the decedent would have worked at those hours.

Earl Weinberg, the owner of the camp, testified that the decedent was not required to live at the camp, could live where he desired and was not on call at any time. Raymond Jacobs, another fellow-employe, stated that they were not required to be back at the camp again until the following morning at 8 a.m. and testified to the decedent’s movements subsequent to his leaving camp until about midnight.

With this conflicting testimony the referee made an award in favor of the claimant. He made six findings of fact and two conclusions of law but made no specific finding as to whether or not the decedent was required to be on the premises of his employer at the time of his death. Upon appeal, the board, which is the ultimate fact finding body, vacated the award and dismissed the claim. It did not disturb the six findings of fact but added two additional findings[1] and substituted a different conclusion of law.[2]

*75 Section 301(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, reads: “The term `injury by an accident in the course of his employment,’ as used in this article . . . shall include all injuries caused by the condition of the premises . . . sustained by the employe, who . . . is injured upon the premises occupied by or under the control of the employer . . ., the employe’s presence thereon being required by the nature of his employment.”

It is well established that where the compensation authorities refuse to find facts in favor of the party having the burden of proof, the question on review is not whether the evidence would sustain such a finding but whether the board’s findings of fact are consistent with each other and with its conclusions of law and can be sustained without a capricious disregard of competent evidence: Newman v. Congregation of Mercy and Truth, 196 Pa. Superior Ct. 350, 175 A.2d 160; Dandy v. Glaze, 197 Pa. Superior Ct 218. 177 A.2d 157.

It is also well established that “While the board is the ultimate arbiter of the facts and its findings are binding on appeal if supported by competent evidence, the appellate court may review questions of law, including whether the law has been properly applied to the facts: Ede v. Ruhe Motor Corp., 184 Pa. Superior Ct. 603, 136 A.2d 151. If the facts permit of but one legitimate inference, the question becomes one of law [citing cases].”: Adams v. Dunn, 192 Pa. Superior Ct. 319, at 323, 162 A.2d 42.

In the present case it is undenied that the decedent was upon the premises of the employer at the time of his death. However, whether his presence was “required by the nature of his employment” was a controverted question. The board decided that question in favor of the defendant and, since it can be sustained *76 without a capricious disregard of competent evidence, we are bound by it.

The claimant cites the cases of Delbene v. Pine, 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 353, 19 A.2d 533; Werner v. Allegheny County, 153 Pa. Superior Ct. 10, 33 A.2d 451; Wolsko v. American Bridge Co., 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 339, 44 A.2d 873; Weiss v. Friedman’s Hotel, 176 Pa. Superior Ct. 98, 106 A.2d 867; and Dupree v. Barney, 193 Pa. Superior Ct. 331, 163 A.2d 901, in all of which the present question was involved and in all of which the claimant recovered an award. However, in all of them except the Wolsko case there was a definite finding that the employe was required to live on the premises or was on call at all times. In the Wolsko case the deceased’s employment was to commence at 5 p.m. and the accident occurred at 4:45 p.m. We said: “Deceased was injured about 15 minutes before his day’s work was to begin. It was entirely proper for deceased to be on the premises of his employer a reasonable length of time before the hour fixed for him to commence his duties.”

On the other hand, the appellee relies on the case of Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co., 149 Pa. Superior Ct. 444, 27 A.2d 445. In that case the deceased was the janitor for an apartment house. He was paid $50.00 a month less $10.00 rent for his living quarters, which were over the garage sixty feet in the rear of the main apartment building. When the furnace was not operating he was free to leave from 7 p.m. until 7 a.m. During the evening of September 10, 1937 he entertained friends in his apartment and then went for an automobile ride with them. They returned at 1:30 a.m. to his quarters. The party broke up at about 2:15 a.m. A fire occurred at 4 a.m. and he was burned to death. The referee disallowed compensation, holding that he was not in the course of his employment. The board substituted findings and held *77 he was in the course of employment because he was subject to call at any time. The court of common pleas sustained the board. However, we reversed, holding that there was no evidence to support the board’s finding that he was on 24-hour duty. We said, at page 447: “Whether deceased met death in the course of his employment is a question of law for the courts: Lewis v. Capital Bakers, Inc. et al., 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 171, 18 A.2d 883; Strunk v. E.D. Huffman & Sons, 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 429, 19 A.2d 539. Even if we assume, as the appellee contends, that the deceased’s apartment was a part of the employer’s premises within the meaning of that term used in our compensation act [compare Brown v. Elks’ Club No. 123, 113 Pa. Superior Ct. 226, 172 A. 408; Dunphy v. Augustinian College of Villanova et al., 129 Pa. Superior Ct. 262, 195 A. 782; and Tappato et al. v. Teplick & Eisenberg Co. et al., 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 231, 2 A.2d 545] there is no evidence to support the board’s finding that deceased was on 24 hour duty subject to call at any time when he died thus warranting the conclusion that he was in the course of his employment at the time of his death. The proof is directly to the contrary. When the furnace was not in operation Ormes’ hours of employment in no instance extended beyond 9:00 P. M. Furthermore, on the evening and early morning in question he undoubtedly removed himself from the course of his employment in acting as host to a drinking party which had nothing whatever to do with his usual employment, being wholly foreign thereto. The fact that he was found fatally burned by a fire, probably of accidental origin, in his home located on his employer’s premises did not warrant the conclusion that he met his death in the course of his employment. This is not a case where an employee after performing his usual duties was found dead on his employer’s premises under unexplained circumstances.”

*78 We agree that the facts in the present case are so similar that a similar result must follow.

Order affirmed.

NOTES

[1] “Seventh: That the deceased, William L. Barrick, was not required to be on the premises of his employer at the time of his death.

“Eighth: That the deceased, William L. Barrick, was not engaged in the course of his employment at the time of his death. “

[2] “Second: Since the death of the decedent was not a direct result of an injury which occurred in the course of his employment with the defendant the claimant is not entitled to recover compensation as provided by the Act.”

Backpacking and Primitive Camping

Primitive camping, also sometimes referred to as backpacking, is a true wilderness camping experience. There are no modern conveniences such as bathroom and shower facilities. You pack in what you need to camp for the night.

To primitive camp in state forests or parks, you must:

• Obtain a camping permit if staying more than one night in an area in a state forest

• Make a reservation for a trail shelter in a state park

While primitive camping in state forests and parks, please practice the
Leave No Trace guidelines.

Primitive Camping in State Forests

Primitive camping can take different forms but is always a true wilderness camping experience. Enjoy the solitude and tranquility of staying overnight in a state forest; and with 2.2-million acres of land and more than 5,000 miles of trails, outdoor enthusiasts find endless opportunities for this activity.

There are no modern conveniences and no vehicle access, so all equipment is carried by you.

Trailside Camping in State Forests

Trailside camping (backpacking) is the most popular form of primitive camping and is often done along one of the
18 State Forest Hiking Trails. Many other local trails can also be used to form unique and adventurous routes.

Many State Forest Hiking Trails require multiple nights, hiking from campsite to campsite in order to complete, but the abundance of connector trails also offer shorter hikes for overnight trips.

Trailside camping is part of an overall backcountry travel experience. It involves hiking far from nearby buildings, roads, and trailheads where you will find no modern conveniences or campsite improvements.

Those who are trailside camping are often referred to as backpackers, many of whom utilize tents; however, hammocks, bivy sacks, and other equipment are becoming increasingly popular. No matter your preference, be sure to be fully prepared with everything you’ll need to spend a night in the woods away from your vehicle.

Beyond just the traditional, trailside backpacking, primitive camping includes overnight camping where all equipment is transported by other non-motorized vehicle methods, including watercraft, bicycle, or horse.

A motorized vehicle is not located near or part of the camping experience. Bicycle users and horseback riders may not be permitted on some trails; and there may be unique camping regulations for these uses, so remember to check with the state forest district office.

Primitive Camping Guidelines in State Forests

Backpack campers are permitted to camp in most areas of the forest without a permit if staying no more than one night in any location.  Backpackers may camp overnight anywhere except:

• In designated Natural Areas
• Within 200 feet of a forest road
• Within 25 feet of a trail
• Within 100 feet of a stream or any open water

See the DCNR Bureau of Forestry’s
Motorized and Primitive Camping Guidelines and Ethics (PDF) for additional requirements when camping in state forests.

Primitive Group Camping in State Forests

If you would like to camp in a group of more than 10 people, a Letter of Authorization must first be obtained from the
state forest district office where your group would like to stay. There are some sensitive areas in state forests where the landscape cannot sustain larger groups.

Primitive Camping Permits in State Forests

Remember, if you are camping close enough to your vehicle to access it to store gear and supplies, you are not primitive camping, but are
motorized, roadside camping.

A permit and fee is always required for motorized, roadside camping and can only be done at designated sites. Please plan appropriately.

There is no fee for a state forest primitive camping permit. Primitive campers spending no more than one night at a campsite do not need a camping permit; however, a free camping permit is required if:

• You desire an emergency point-of-contact.

• You stay at a campsite more than one night.

• You stay at a campsite designated “permit required.”

• A campfire is desired during spring wildfire season — you must obtain permission from the state forest to have a campfire from March 1 through May 25; no campfires are permitted when the state forest district forester determines the forest fire danger to be high, very high, or extreme.

• You camp using a vehicle for storage or transportation.

• You camp within the Pine Creek Gorge along the Pine Creek Rail Trail in Tiadaghton or Tioga State Forests.

To request a free, state forest primitive camping permit, please contact the
state forest district office for where you are planning to camp.

Primitive Camping in State Parks

Hiking in and putting up a tent where you choose, is NOT permitted in Pennsylvania state parks. All camping must be in a designated camping area and on designated sites. Many Pennsylvania state park campgrounds have walk-in sites which are for tents only and are more private than campsites with a paved camping pad.

Some parks have backpacking trailside shelters or sites, which can be in very remote areas, but visitors still must camp in designated areas.

Currently, there are five state parks that allow backpacking and overnight hikes:

• Laurel Ridge

• Ohiopyle

• Moraine

• Oil Creek

• Raccoon Creek

These parks provide backpacking trails with overnight trailside shelters or sites. You must pre-register to hike and camp overnight at these state parks.

Backpacking Reservations at State Parks

Backpackers can obtain a camping permit for these parks at the
Pennsylvania state parks reservation website or by calling the specific park office during business hours.  

If making an online backpacking reservation, in the “Where” field, enter the name of the state park you are interested in. In the “Interested in” field, select “Permits & Wilderness” from the dropdown menu.

Laurel Ridge State Park, Laurel Highlands Hiking Trail

• Trail mileage within park: 70 miles

• Total trail mileage: 70 miles

• Number of overnight sites: 8

• Number of shelters per site: 5

• Number of tent spaces per site: 25

• Amenities available: firewood, fireplaces, fire rings, and pit toilets

• Amenities not available: check in at park office for availability of water

• Pets allowed: Yes

• Reserve sites: up to 11 months in advance

Ohiopyle State Park, Laurel Highlands Hiking Trail

Ohiopyle is the southern entrance to the Laurel Highlands Hiking Trail

Moraine State Park, North Country National Scenic Trail

• Trail mileage within McConnells Mill, Moraine, and Jennings: 25. 9 miles

• Trail mileage within Moraine: 13.9 miles

• Total trail mileage: 4,600 miles

• Number of overnight sites: 1 (Moraine State Park)

• Number of shelters per site: 3

• Number of tent spaces per site: 0

• Amenities available: restroom and fire ring

• Amenities not available: firewood and water

• Pets allowed: Yes

• Reserve sites: up to 11 months in advance

Oil Creek State Park, Oil Creek/Gerard Hiking Trail

• Trail mileage within park: 36 miles

• Total trail mileage: 36 miles

• Number of overnight sites: 2

• Number of shelters per site: 6

• Number of tent spaces per site: spaces are available

• Amenities available: water (Seasonal April 1 to November 1), firewood (when available), restrooms, picnic table, and fireplaces

• Pets allowed: Yes

• Reserve sites: up to 11 months in advance

Raccoon Creek State Park

• Backpacking trail loop mileage within park: 44 miles

• Number of overnight sites: 2

• Number of shelters per site: 5

• Number of tent spaces per site: 5

• Amenities available: water and pit latrines/port-a-johns available 1/4-mile from campsite, fire ring

• Amenities not available: firewood (may be purchased at park office)

• Pets allowed: Yes

• Reserve sites: up to 11 months in advance

Reservation Changes and Cancellations

Cancellations and changes can be handled online under “My Account” or by calling the call center. Any cancellation or change on the day of arrival must be made through the state park where the reservation occurs.

Please see state park’s
reservation cancellation and change policy for additional information about cancelling or changing reservations and associated fees.

“St. Seraphim Camp – the true triumph of Orthodoxy!”

“St. Seraphim Camp – the true triumph of Orthodoxy!”

The Eastern American Diocese has a long tradition of hosting various children’s camps during the summer months. When we talk about summer camps, scout camps immediately come to mind, and, above all, camps of the Organization of Russian Young Scouts (ORYUR) and the National Organization of Russian Scouts (NORR). But over the past 25 years, a new camp has been opened in the Poconos, named after Rev. Seraphim of Sarov. Serafimovsky camp was founded in 1992 parishioners of the Church of Christ the Savior mountains. Wilkes-Barre, pc. Pennsylvania. It has since grown to become the largest summer camp in the Eastern American Diocese and is not going to give up. On Friday, August 4th and Saturday, August 5th, we drove to the Pocono Mountains to learn the secret behind this very popular summer camp.

“The camp was founded in 1992, when I was serving in these places, as a parish project,” says Archpriest Alexy Duncan (rector of Our Lady of the Nativity Church in Albany, New York, and founder of the camp). For two years more and more people wanted to take part in it, and then Archbishop Laurus (later Metropolitan) supported our initiative to open a camp for all youth.” While the organizers were looking for a suitable place for the camp, the news of the new camp was spreading like wildfire. The prayers of the Rev. Seraphim, oh Alexy was able to get in touch with local American scouts, and they kindly offered a place for the newly established Orthodox summer camp at their Akahila camp.

Camp Akahila is located in Blakeslee, pc. Pennsylvania, on a 242-acre peninsula at the confluence of the Lehigh and Tobyhanna rivers. The location is ideal for an Orthodox summer camp, not only because of its proximity to New York, but also because the camp offers a wide range of activities for children, such as rafting, archery, rifle shooting and many others. . The American Scouts even have a chapel, which every year turns into a temporary Orthodox church with a portable iconostasis. All this simplifies the organization of an Orthodox summer camp – and there is no need to buy land and build new facilities. “The first year we came to the Akahila camp, everything seemed to explode,” says Father Alexy. “We had over 100 children, and in recent years the number has been constantly growing.” Currently, an average of 200 children a year come to the camp.

The most notable difference between the Seraphim Camp and the Eastern American Diocese scout camps is the use of English in the first language. While in the camps of scouts they mainly speak Russian, in the St. Seraphim camp they speak English. “When we started organizing the camp, we wanted to give children who do not speak Russian the opportunity to also attend an Orthodox summer camp,” said Father Alexy. “But St. Seraphim’s camp always opens after scout camps, and we began to notice that many “Russian-speaking children also enroll in it. This year we can say with confidence that most of our camp is bilingual children.”

“This is not a scout camp. I grew up in a camp of Russian scouts, where we wore uniforms, raised flags, marched, etc. But this is not suitable for everyone,” says Archpriest Andrey Sommer (Deputy Chairman of the Synodal Youth Department). “Some children prefer one camp over the other, while others go to both camps, but as the Russian Orthodox Church continues to grow and embrace people of diverse non-Russian backgrounds and traditions, it is important for us to reach out to them as well and create a camp that will respond to them specific needs. This camp is special because it is the only purely Orthodox ROCOR camp in America, with no specific patriotic or Scouting focus.”

Priest Richard Reid (rector of St. Joseph of Optina Church in Virginia Beach, Virginia) has been coming to the camp for six years and believes that “this is the place where children can be in an Orthodox environment 24 hours a day. When we are here, we are not really in the world, but in an Orthodox oasis where children can practice their faith and learn what it means to be Orthodox.”

St. Seraphim’s camp, according to custom, takes place in the first week of August to celebrate the feast of St. Seraphim of Sarov (August 1, NS). Every day begins with morning prayers, then breakfast and classes on the Law of God. Classes are led by a group of 8-10 priests from the diocese who take time out of their busy schedules to spend time with the children. Classes are held in an informal setting and usually outdoors, where children are divided into groups by gender and age. “We try not to repeat the knowledge that they can get in their home parish, such as the basics of the Law of God. Since most of these children already have a basic understanding of the Orthodox faith, we can delve into more complex and relevant topics,” says O. Alexy.

When we visited different groups, we heard topics such as the Orthodox approach to suicide, same-sex marriage, transsexuals, etc. being discussed. “We can’t get away from some of the modern questions our kids are facing in school. These topics make them really ‘digest’ at school, so when they come here they ask us these questions – which is great! We can guide them the way the Orthodox Church teaches,” explains Fr. Andrey.

While the older children are talking about these serious and topical topics, the younger ones are discussing the lives of saints such as St. Seraphim of Sarov and St. John of San Francisco, myrrh-streaming icons and how to live life in Christ.

After the young campers finish their lessons on the Law of God, they devote the rest of the day to what Fr. Alexy calls “entertainment”. In the camp, children can swim in the turbulent clear waters of the Lehigh River, play sports, shoot with rifle and archery, participate in such interesting projects as making T-shirts and writing-decorating stones, making camp fires, they also organize talent shows and dances, swim in the pool and do many other things. But no matter what activities children participate in, one thing remains the same – there are always priests next to them. Each priest is given a group of children with whom they communicate in addition to studying the Law of God. “During the day, children constantly come up to me and ask personal questions that they don’t want to ask during group classes,” says Father Andrey. “Through this kind of communication, we can establish close relationships with each teenager in our group – and this is wonderful! ”

Such a personal relationship with the clergy is the key to the success of the camp, as a result of which the children finally begin to speak openly about the problems facing the Orthodox in the modern world. One of these conversations was remembered by Priest Gabriel Weller (rector of the Church of St. Myrrh-bearing Women in Harrisonburg, Virge). “Some senior assistants told me that when they go to a restaurant and eat there, they don’t cross themselves and don’t pray, because they are being looked at. Then I told them: ‘We need to pray! People need to look at you. “Bearing witness about Christ is what we are all called to do here. We are not of this world. We also talk about St. Seraphim and what he taught about the acquisition of inner peace, through which thousands around will be saved. We explain to the children, that they never know in advance what effect they can have on others if they are bold enough, if they love God and are not ashamed of their faith.”

At the end of a fun week, everything suddenly stops, and calm and silence come to the camp. As we approached the main dining room, we heard the familiar words of the pre-communion prayers read over a loudspeaker. All 250 campers and helpers stood quietly in line for confession, while the older children read the rule for communion. The little boys who recently played in the forest were joking with each other, standing quietly in line, thinking about their sins and transgressions. Near them stood girls, all with their heads covered. The priests scattered around the dining room, listened to confessions and gave instructions to the children. Then came the time for the akathist to St. Seraphim Sarovsky, who wonderfully performed the youth choir.

Later that day, the youth gathered for the All-Night Vigil in the open-air chapel. The youth choir prayerfully sang the service, and the clergy continued to confess until late in the evening. After the service, the campers returned to their tents and spent the rest of the evening in quiet prayerful contemplation in anticipation of the Divine Liturgy. The last camp day was truly the triumph of Orthodoxy! After spending a week with their brothers and sisters in Christ, confessing their sins, all campers partake of the Holy Mysteries of Christ.

Photo album

“St. Seraphim’s camp – the true triumph of Orthodoxy!” – 08/05/17

(120 photos)

see photos here >

But the beauty of the St. Seraphim camp is also that it does not end with the end of the camp. Communication between the campers usually continues throughout the year on social networks and at various events such as St. Herman’s Youth Congresses. Friendship that originated in the camp of St. Seraphim, lasts for many years, and some even get married and get married. “That is why we invite our youth here,” says Fr. Gabriel. “So that they can meet Orthodox friends from all over the country and, in the end, they can find an Orthodox life partner. who to meet, unless of course they want to meet someone from the non-Orthodox. Here we can create a network of friends, resulting in marriages, which began in this camp. Three weddings have already been played this year.” Father Richard confirms Fr. Gabriel and says that “the number of marriages born here is a kind of test for the camp of St. Seraphim. All this indicates that we are doing the right thing.”

The opportunity for young people to communicate with the clergy and with each other in an Orthodox environment is considered the main goal of the camp of st. Seraphim, but how effective is it? Despite the fact that more and more children are constantly coming to the camp, can we be sure that the children are growing spiritually? “Of course they are growing,” Father Richard says. “I notice it when I return here every year. The children talk about their lives and how they have grown over the past year while we have not seen each other. So even if I don’t see I will notice their spiritual growth next year when they return. And this is a great spiritual joy for me. As a priest, I see that I am doing what God expects from me. I can influence the children – the future of our Church and our country”.

St. Seraphim Camp is an unforgettable experience for our children, but it also gives the clergy the time they need to get closer to each other. Father Andrei says that “for the clergy it is almost like a continuation of pastoral congresses.” And about. Richard explains: “Together, the clergy gather around the fire at night and discuss topics that we don’t get our hands on during conventions. It’s a great place; here we can come together, be honest and open with each other, and learn from each other. The secret camp is that the clergy take out of the camp no less useful than children.

Living in the forest for a whole week is not easy, but Fr. Gabriel believes that the benefits are worth the sacrifice. “Life in the camp is connected with stress, but it’s worth it. Here we meet people from all over the country, and this kindles such warm and inexpressible feelings in our hearts.” Love for children is what unites all volunteers who take time out of their busy schedules to work hard so that our children have a place where they can have fun and, at the same time, learn to live as Orthodox Christians. The best thing to say about this is Fr. Andrei Sommer: “The biggest plus for us who come here is the joy of giving. How wonderful to feel that you have the opportunity to give everything you have to these children! Giving – what could be better!”

Subdeacon Peter Lukianov
Eastern American Diocese Press Office

NEWS

00000

Mayfield, PA: Metropolitan Nicholas presides over Patronal Feast of St. John the Baptist Cathedral

00001

Lewisburg, PA: Bishop Luke led the Patronal Feast of the Mission of St. John of Shanghai

00002

Miami, Florida: Metropolitan Jonah leads the 40th anniversary of the community of the Holy Apostles

Parishes

Clergy

Kursk Root Icon

Resources

Church Calendar

Metropolitan Nicholas
Bishop Luke
Diocesan Council
Deaneries of the Diocese
Spiritual Court
Diocesan Office
Audit Commission
Diocesan Press Service

MEDIA LIBRARY

Latest news
Announcements
News
Photos
Podcasts
Videos
Diocese faces

9000 2 PARISH LIST

Temples
Clergy

RESOURCES

Pastoral Resources
Choir Resources

History

Bishops
Metropolitan Philaret (Voznesensky)
My work in the vineyard of Christ
Kursk Root Icon
Joseph Muñoz-Cortez
St. Vladimir Memorial Church
Metropolitan Hilarion (Kapral)

Reiseagentur Altai Adventure GmbH Berlin Altai Mountains Flyer Text, agency fliers, text, class png

Reiseagentur Altai Adventure GmbH Berlin Altai Mountains Flyer Text, agency fliers, text, class png

tags

• text,
• class,
• flyer,
• April,
• brochure,
• summer camp,
• sport Climbing,
• fire,
• canoes,
• brand,
• Blau Mobilfunk,
• Berlin,
• Asilo Nido,
• Animal track,
• Altai mountains,
• advertising,
• 1993,
• png,
• transparent png,
• no background,
• free download

Download PNG ( 316.03KB )

Image size

710x768px

File size

316.03KB

MIME type

Image/png

resize PNG

width(px)

height(px)

Non-Commercial Use, DMCA Contact Us

org/ImageGallery” align=”middle”>

• Brochure Flyer Graphic design Advertising, creative flyer design, text, sport png
  1400x1400px
  1.19MB

• Flyer Organization Corporate design Marketing Advertising campaign, Election Flyers, text, poster png
  587x1024px
  319.08KB

• Advertising Brochure Sports Flyer, design, text, sport png
  1400x1400px
  1.1MB

• Brochure Summer camp Flyer Graphic design, design, fashion, poster png
  600x592px
  405.53KB

• Matterhorn Climbing Mountaineering Hiking, Climbing the mountain, text, sport png
  7514x4190px
  453.86KB

• org/ImageObject”>

  quad.rat Corporate Communications GmbH Graphic design Text Flyer Advertising agency, Quad Flyer, text, logo png
  960x600px
  397.76KB

• Brochure Summer camp Flyer Graphic design, design, fashion, poster png
  600x592px
  405.53KB

• Graphic design Sailing Cabaret Poster, design, text, sport png
  1526x958px
  1MB

• Warped Wall Ninja Competition Sport Summer camp, Ninja, microphone, physical Fitness png
  1024x611px
  114.45KB

• Summer camp Brochure Camping Flyer, summer book, child, text png
  500x514px
  65.51KB

• Summer camp Camping, summer theme, text, logo png
  1998x875px
  156. 75KB

• Advertising Brochure Sports Flyer, design, text, sport png
  1400x1400px
  1.1MB

• Gymnastics technique Tumbling & Dance Logo Kids Brand Summer camp, child, child, text png
  761x725px
  1.04MB

• 2016 Summer Olympics Poster Advertising, Olympic Track, game, text png
  3543x2362px
  3.24MB

• NFL Pro Sports Experience New York Giants Philadelphia Eagles American football, nfl, text, sport png
  1800x1950px
  268.63KB

• Summer Shout Festival Special Offer! Flyer Advertising Logo Bat, bat, animals, text png
  989x544px
  12.44KB

• org/ImageObject”>

  Der gläserne Schatz: die Bilderbibel der St. Marienkirche in Frankfurt an der Oder, text, weather Forecast png
  1000x1330px
  443.22KB

• Yoga Family Child Asana Retreat, Yoga, child, text png
  2628x875px
  153.77KB

• Poster Tennis, Tennis training, class, text png
  859x500px
  219.88KB

• Poster Advertising Summer, Cool Summer, miscellaneous, purple png
  1024x870px
  742.17KB

• Summer camp Organization Building Business, Summer surfing, winter, building png
  1165x1938px
  73.35KB

• Flyer Graphic design Asilo nido Brochure, design, text, media png
  1000x600px
  647. 18KB

• Canada Sports Games Championship, training camp, game, text png
  1000x469px
  71.34KB

• Goethe Trailhead Ranch RV Camping Dunnellon Camping Campervans Pet Museum, pets, tshirt, text png
  852x380px
  255.52KB

• NFL New York Giants Philadelphia Eagles American football Arizona Wildcats football, football camp, text, sport png
  1800x1950px
  270.94KB

• Camp Lohican Summer camp Pocono Scranton Mountains, summer camp text, tshirt, child png
  1704x587px
  478.81KB

• Summer camp Sports Junior Day camp Baseball Softball, School Football Flyer, blue, child png
  900x327px
  225. 45KB

• Flyer Advertising Sports Promo Poster, product promotion, text, sport png
  1920x1130px
  398.27KB

• Karate Dojo Sonthofen e.V., Helmut Schelldorf The Karate Kid Graphic design, karate, text, advertising Advertising png
  1043x663px
  506.97KB

• Tattoo Flyer Kosmetik-Verordnung Advertising Brochure, flyer printing, text, flyer png
  900x600px
  449.6KB

• Golf Balls Trolley miles per hour Sport, Golf, text, sport png
  1000x800px
  2.87MB

• BASF Bulletin board Brand management Text Brochure, louis frame, text, sport png
  930x600px
  550.99KB

• org/ImageObject”>

  Camp El Tesoro Camp Fire Georgia Summer camp Campfire, campfire, text, logo png
  1246x381px
  91.39KB

• Camp Timber Tops Summer camp Camping T-shirt Camp Lohikan, august eighteen summer discount, child, food png
  2439x2439px
  220.84KB

• Reiseagentur Altai Adventure GmbH Berlin Altai Mountains Flyer Text 0, Agency flyers, text, association png
  710x768px
  282.09KB

• Military education and training Color Computer file, Military training camp colors fade, miscellaneous, template png
  4244x972px
  1.92MB

• Summer camp Children’s camp Day camp Vacation Bible school, child, child, text png
  1831x684px
  128.24KB

• org/ImageObject”>

  NFL Pro Sports Experience New York Giants Philadelphia Eagles American football, nfl, text, sport png
  1800x1950px
  268.63KB

• Lake Placid ADK WildHorse Camp, Summer camp for girls Horse show horse, english camp, horse, text png
  784x542px
  316.32KB

• Sportswear American youth football organization Banner Championship, American Youth Football Organization, text, sport png
  960x375px
  512KB

• Accommodation Mt Sequoyah Center, Inc. Swimming pool Cottage, Swimming, child, text png
  619x619px
  169.67KB

• Flyer Dojo Brochure Karate Text, Training Flyer, text, sport png
  1027x700px
  377.83KB

• org/ImageObject”>

  Graphic design Brochure Flyer Sailing, Business Corporate Identity Gift Items Stationery, text, distribution png
  650x460px
  275.33KB

• Dance studio Art Ballet Choreography, SUMMER CLASS, child, studio png
  1100x729px
  667KB

• Health insurance Loyalty program Humana Medicare, others, text, logo png
  1200x1540px
  757.68KB

• Reiseagentur Altai Adventure GmbH Berlin Altai Mountains Flyer Text 0, Agency flyers, text, association png
  710x768px
  282.09KB

• In the Jungle Theater of the Cities Lyussettning Text Book, book, text, poster png
  800x539px
  323.79KB