Who were the top performers in the 2023 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament. Which players stood out during March Madness. How did UConn’s dominance impact the All-Tournament selections. What surprising players made the cut for the All-Tournament Team.
UConn’s Dominance and Championship Run
The 2023 NCAA men’s basketball tournament concluded with the UConn Huskies claiming their fifth national title since 1999. Their impressive run through the tournament culminated in a decisive 76-59 victory over San Diego State in the championship game. UConn’s dominance throughout March Madness was a testament to their well-rounded team and exceptional coaching.
How did UConn’s performance compare to previous championship teams? Their average margin of victory throughout the tournament was an astounding 20 points, showcasing their ability to consistently outperform their opponents on both ends of the court. This level of dominance is rarely seen in the highly competitive NCAA tournament landscape.
All-Tournament Team Selection Criteria
The selection of the All-Tournament Team is a process that recognizes the most outstanding individual performances throughout March Madness. To be considered for this prestigious honor, players must have reached at least the Elite Eight round of the tournament. First-team honors are reserved exclusively for those who made it to the Final Four, emphasizing the importance of both individual excellence and team success.
What factors are considered when selecting the All-Tournament Team? Selectors typically look at:
- Statistical performance across multiple games
- Impact on team success
- Clutch performances in high-pressure situations
- Consistency throughout the tournament
- Overall contribution to their team’s tournament run
Second Team Standouts
Markquis Nowell – Kansas State
Markquis Nowell’s tournament performance was nothing short of spectacular. The diminutive 5’7″ point guard averaged an impressive 23.5 points and 13.5 assists per game. His most notable achievement came in the Sweet 16 against Michigan State, where he set an NCAA tournament record with 19 assists in a single game. Nowell’s ability to create for his teammates while also being a scoring threat made him a nightmare for opposing defenses.
Drew Timme – Gonzaga
Despite a challenging Elite Eight game against UConn, Drew Timme’s overall tournament performance was remarkable. The 6’10” forward averaged 24.3 points and 9.3 assists through four games. His standout moment came in the Sweet 16 against UCLA, where he dominated with 36 points and 13 rebounds. Timme’s consistency and leadership were crucial factors in Gonzaga’s tournament run.
Ryan Kalkbrenner – Creighton
Ryan Kalkbrenner made an immediate impact in the tournament with a phenomenal first-round performance against NC State. The 7’0″ junior scored 31 points on 11-of-14 shooting, adding 7 rebounds and 3 blocks. Throughout his four tournament games, Kalkbrenner averaged 20.0 points while shooting an efficient 60.4 percent from the field. His presence in the paint was a game-changer for Creighton on both ends of the court.
Nijel Pack – Miami
Nijel Pack’s sharpshooting was a key factor in Miami’s surprising run to the Final Four. His breakout performance came in the Sweet 16 upset over No. 1 seed Houston, where he knocked down 7-of-10 three-point attempts en route to 26 points. While his scoring dipped in the following games, Pack still averaged 16.4 points per game and shot an impressive 45.5% from beyond the arc during the tournament.
Marcus Carr – Texas
As the heart and soul of the Texas Longhorns, Marcus Carr led his team to an Elite Eight appearance. The senior guard averaged 15.5 points, 4.8 assists, and 2.5 rebounds per game while shooting 45% from three-point range. Carr’s leadership and clutch performances were instrumental in Texas being the last team standing from the top two seed lines.
First Team Selections: The Elite of the Elite
Lamont Butler – San Diego State
Lamont Butler etched his name in March Madness lore with his game-winning buzzer-beater against Florida Atlantic in the Final Four. However, his contributions went far beyond that single shot. The 6’6″ guard averaged 10.5 points, 3.3 rebounds, 3.3 assists, and 1.2 steals across six tournament games. Butler’s defensive prowess, recognized by his selection to the Mountain West All-Defensive team, was a crucial element in San Diego State’s surprising run to the national championship game.
Alijah Martin – Florida Atlantic
Florida Atlantic’s Cinderella run to the Final Four was a team effort, but Alijah Martin emerged as a key scorer when it mattered most. The 6’2″ guard led his team with 17 points in the Elite Eight victory over Kansas State. He then exploded for 26 points against San Diego State in the Final Four, including 19 in a second-half surge that nearly carried the Owls to the title game. Martin’s tournament averages of 15.2 points and 4.4 rebounds per game highlighted his importance to Florida Atlantic’s historic run.
Impact of Clutch Performances on All-Tournament Team Selection
Clutch performances in high-stakes games often carry significant weight in All-Tournament Team selections. Lamont Butler’s buzzer-beater and Alijah Martin’s second-half explosion in the Final Four are prime examples of how single moments can elevate a player’s status. These performances not only showcase a player’s skill but also their ability to thrive under intense pressure.
How do clutch moments compare to consistent excellence throughout the tournament? While consistency is crucial, the ability to deliver in critical moments often separates good tournament performers from great ones. Selectors typically aim to balance overall performance with standout games and memorable plays when making their decisions.
Surprising Inclusions and Notable Omissions
Every year, the All-Tournament Team features some surprising inclusions and notable omissions. The 2023 selections were no exception. Players like Lamont Butler and Alijah Martin, who were not household names before the tournament, earned their spots through outstanding performances on the biggest stage.
What factors contribute to surprising selections? Often, it’s a combination of:
- Unexpected team success (e.g., Florida Atlantic’s Final Four run)
- Breakout individual performances
- Clutch plays in high-profile games
- Consistency throughout a deep tournament run
Conversely, some highly-touted players may miss out on All-Tournament honors due to early exits or underwhelming performances. The unpredictable nature of March Madness often leads to unexpected heroes emerging while some stars fail to shine.
The Role of Team Success in Individual Recognition
Team success plays a significant role in All-Tournament Team selections. Players from teams that make deep runs in the tournament have more opportunities to showcase their skills and impact high-stakes games. This is evident in the criteria that require players to reach at least the Elite Eight for consideration, with first-team honors reserved for Final Four participants.
Does this emphasis on team success potentially overshadow outstanding individual performances on less successful teams? It’s a valid question that often sparks debate among basketball fans and analysts. While there’s merit to recognizing exceptional individual efforts regardless of team outcomes, the current selection process places a premium on players who contribute to their team’s overall success in the tournament.
Statistical Analysis of All-Tournament Team Performances
A closer look at the statistics of All-Tournament Team members reveals some interesting trends. Let’s break down some key numbers:
- Scoring: The selected players averaged between 10.5 and 24.3 points per game during the tournament.
- Efficiency: Shooting percentages varied, with some players like Ryan Kalkbrenner shooting over 60% from the field.
- Versatility: Many selections contributed across multiple statistical categories, showcasing their all-around game.
- Impact: Players like Markquis Nowell made their mark with record-breaking performances in specific categories (19 assists in a single game).
How do these statistics compare to historical All-Tournament Team selections? While scoring averages are in line with past selections, the 2023 team seems to place a higher emphasis on all-around contributions and efficiency rather than just raw scoring numbers.
Future Implications for All-Tournament Team Members
Being named to the All-Tournament Team can have significant implications for a player’s future career prospects. For many, it serves as a springboard to increased national recognition and improved draft stock for those considering a move to professional basketball.
What opportunities might arise for these players following their All-Tournament Team selection?
- Improved NBA draft positioning
- Increased media attention and endorsement opportunities
- Enhanced reputation among college basketball fans and analysts
- Potential for preseason honors and watchlist inclusions for the following season (for returning players)
- Long-term recognition as part of NCAA Tournament history
For players like Lamont Butler and Alijah Martin, who may not have been widely known before the tournament, this recognition could be particularly impactful in shaping their basketball futures.
Men’s March Madness 2023: The All-Tournament Team After the National Championship | News, Scores, Highlights, Stats, and Rumors
- Facebook Logo
- Twitter Logo
- Copy Link Icon
Joel ReuterApril 4, 2023
Men’s March Madness 2023: The All-Tournament Team After the National Championship
0 of 6
- Brett Wilhelm/NCAA Photos via Getty Images
The 2023 NCAA men’s tournament is over, and the UConn Huskies are national champions.
Their run of dominance through the tournament field continued on Monday night with a dominant 76-59 victory over San Diego State. It is the Huskies fifth national title since they hoisted their first banner in 1999.
With March Madness over, it’s now time to pick our All-Tournament Team, with five first-team and five second-team spots up for grabs.
To be considered for inclusion, a player had to have reached the Elite Eight, and first-team honors were reserved for players who appeared in the Final Four.
Let the debate begin!
Second Team
1 of 6
- Markquis NowellBen Solomon/NCAA Photos via Getty Images
Markquis Nowell, Kansas State
Nowell averaged 23.5 points and 13.5 assists while setting an NCAA tournament record with 19 assists in an overtime win against Michigan State in the Sweet 16. The 5’7″ point guard shot just 8-of-21 from the floor against Florida Atlantic in the Elite Eight but still finished with 30 points, 12 assists and five steals.
Drew Timme, Gonzaga
Timme got into foul trouble against UConn in the Elite Eight and finished with just 12 points on 5-of-14 shooting, but even with that down game, his overall tournament numbers were still excellent for the second successive year. The 6’10” forward averaged 24.3 points and 9.3 assists through four games, and his 36-point, 13-rebound performance against UCLA in the Sweet 16 was one of the best individual performances of the tournament.
Ryan Kalkbrenner, Creighton
Kalkbrenner had perhaps the best first-round performance of any player in this year’s tournament, lighting up NC State for 31 points on 11-of-14 shooting while adding seven rebounds and three blocks. The 7’0″ junior averaged 20.0 points on 60.4 percent shooting in his four tournament games.
Nijel Pack, Miami
Pack led the charge in Miami’s upset win against No. 1 seed Houston in the Sweet 16, knocking down 7-of-10 three-point attempts on his way to 26 points. He scored just 23 points combined against Texas and UConn in the Hurricanes’ next two games, but he still averaged 16.4 points while connecting on 15-of-33 attempts from beyond the arc.
Marcus Carr, Texas
Carr averaged 15.5 points, 4.8 assists and 2.5 rebounds while connecting on 9-of-20 from distance in four NCAA tournament games, and he was the best player on the Texas roster all season. The Longhorns ended up being the last team standing from the top two seed lines with their trip to the Elite Eight.
Lamont Butler, San Diego State
2 of 6
- AP Photo/David J. Phillip
Why not reward the player who hit the biggest shot of the tournament with first-team honors?
Lamont Butler drilled the game-winning buzzer-beater against Florida Atlantic in the Final Four to punch the Aztecs’ ticket to the title game, but that was far from his only contributions to the team’s surprise title game run.
The 6’6″ guard averaged 10.5 points, 3.3 rebounds, 3.3 assists and 1.2 steals in six tournament games, including a team-high 18 points against Creighton in the Elite Eight and 13 points on 5-of-11 shooting in the championship game.
The Mountain West All-Defensive team pick was also an integral part of the Aztecs’ smothering defense, which keyed their upset victories over high-powered Alabama and Creighton teams on the road to the Final Four.
Alijah Martin, Florida Atlantic
3 of 6
- Gregory Shamus/Getty Images
The Florida Atlantic Owls were the 2023 NCAA tournament’s biggest Cinderella story, reaching the Final Four on the strength of a deep nine-man rotation that did not rely on any one go-to scorer.
Johnell Davis stole the headlines early with a 29-point, 12-rebound, five-assist, five-steal game against Fairleigh Dickinson in the second round, but it was Alijah Davis who shouldered the scoring load after the opening weekend.
The 6’2″ guard had a team-high 17 points against Kansas State in the Elite Eight. He then exploded for 26 points against San Diego State in the Final Four, with 19 coming in the second half when the Owls briefly built a 14-point lead.
He entered the NCAA tournament with as much momentum as anyone after a season-high 30 points against UAB in the Conference USA tournament title game, and he wrapped up his first March Madness with averages of 15.2 points and 4.4 rebounds.
Jordan Miller, Miami
4 of 6
- Jamie Schwaberow/NCAA Photos via Getty Images
The Miami Hurricanes don’t reach the Final Four without Jordan Miller.
The 6’6″ guard found nothing but the bottom of the net in the team’s comeback win against Texas in the Elite Eight, hitting on 7-of-7 from the floor and 13-of-13 from the free-throw line for a season-high 27 points.
After a forgettable seven-point performance against Drake in the first round, Miller settled in as a reliable scoring option, averaging 15. 4 points, 6.4 rebounds and 2.4 assists while also adding six blocks and two steals.
The George Mason transfer wrapped up his fifth collegiate season and second year at Miami averaging 15.3 points, 6.2 rebounds and 2.7 assists, and with his strong March showing, he may have played his way into the second-round conversation in the upcoming NBA draft.
Jordan Hawkins, UConn
5 of 6
- AP Photo/David J. Phillip
Jordan Hawkins has scored in double-figures and knocked down at least three three-pointers in each of UConn’s first five games in the NCAA tournament, providing crucial perimeter scoring to help open things up for Adama Sanogo on the inside.
Hawkins has a bright NBA future thanks to his shooting ability, and it was on full display against Gonzaga in the Elite Eight.
The 6’5″ guard buried 6-of-10 attempts from beyond the arc en route to 20 points in a blowout win against the Bulldogs, and that came after he torched Arkansas for 24 points on only 13 shot attempts in 28 minutes.
All told, he averaged 16.3 points on 21-of-42 shooting from three-point range in six tournament games, and there is little doubt scouts have taken notice of his sharpshooting abilities.
Adama Sanogo, UConn
6 of 6
- Gregory Shamus/Getty Images
Adama Sanogo did a little bit of everything in UConn’s victory over Miami in the Final Four, finishing with 21 points, 10 rebounds, two blocks and even a pair of made three-pointers to bring his season total to 19.
The 6’9″, 240-pound forward had his way inside against Norchad Omier to win an important individual battle and propel the Huskies to the national championship game.
He followed that up with a 17-points, 10-rebound performance on Monday night to clinch Most Outstanding Player honors for the 2023 NCAA tournament. It was his fourth double-double of the tournament, and he did it on just nine shot attempts while also playing stellar interior defense.
Sanogo was a force all tournament, averaging 19. 7 points, 9.8 rebounds and 1.3 blocks while shooting 66.7 percent from the floor, and those numbers would look even more efficient with a 3-of-11 shooting performance against Gonzaga removed from the equation.
While the game has become more and more perimeter-oriented over the years, Sanogo has proven that a team can still ride a go-to big man offensively all the way to the national championship game.
NCAA Tournament 2023: The All-Tournament Team Ahead of the Sweet 16 | News, Scores, Highlights, Stats, and Rumors
- Facebook Logo
- Twitter Logo
- Copy Link Icon
David KenyonFeatured Columnist IVMarch 22, 2023
NCAA Tournament 2023: The All-Tournament Team Ahead of the Sweet 16
0 of 6
- Drew TimmeJustin Edmonds/Getty Images
Four days of clutch shots, upsets and general mayhem enveloped the opening rounds of the 2023 men’s NCAA tournament, and the days leading up to the Sweet 16 provide a chance to reset all the action.
By this point, you probably know the teams. Top seeds Alabama and Houston headline the remaining field, which includes Cinderella stories Florida Atlantic and Princeton. And there are well-known programs—Gonzaga, Michigan State and UCLA, among them—in between.
Because of the nonstop action, however, you might’ve missed the best players of the tournament so far.
Since we’re only through the first weekend, a couple of standout individuals are included in spite of their team suffering a loss. Each player at least advanced to the second round, though.
The selections are subjective to a degree but lean heavily on box-score production while considering key in-game contributions.
Second Team
1 of 6
- AP Photo/Michael Conroy
Johnell Davis, Florida Atlantic
Johnell Davis scored 10 of his 12 points in the second half of FAU’s win over Memphis, including clutch three-pointers on back-to-back possessions late in the game. Then, he racked up 29 points, 12 rebounds, five assists and five steals to end Fairleigh Dickinson’s Cinderella story.
Davonte Davis, Arkansas
Arkansas has leaned on Davonte Davis, a standout defender who provided 16 points, six rebounds and four steals in the opener against Illinois. Three of his four steals immediately led to a bucket. Davis followed that performance up with 25 points and eight rebounds in the upset of top-seeded Kansas. So far, he’s shot a terrific 16-of-29 from the floor.
Mike Miles Jr., TCU
TCU’s tourney is over after falling to Gonzaga in the second round. Mike Miles Jr., though, assembled an excellent two-game run. He tallied 26 points and three assists to lead TCU past Arizona State and provided 24 points with four assists and two steals against Gonzaga.
Anton Watson, Gonzaga
Speaking of the Zags: Who doesn’t love a glue guy? Anton Watson is a critical part of the program’s success. Through two games, he’s registered 23 points and 23 rebounds—including 11 offensive boards—with seven assists, five steals and two blocks.
Dylan Disu, Texas
One of two players with a double-double in both rounds, Dylan Disu played a leading role in the Longhorns’ second-round win. He overwhelmed Penn State with 28 points on 14-of-20 shooting, adding 10 rebounds and two steals. Disu also netted 17 points and grabbed 10 boards in the earlier victory over Colgate.
First Team: Markquis Nowell, Kansas State
2 of 6
- Jacob Kupferman/Getty Images
Given he stands just 5’7″, Markquis Nowell carries the label of being an “undersized” player.
Another label? All-American.
As he did throughout the regular season, the playmaking guard has shown off his two-way excellence in March Madness. Nowell torched Montana State for 17 points and 14 assists before ripping Kentucky’s defense apart to the tune of 27 points and nine assists. Along with burying six of 14 threes, he’s nabbed three steals in each game.
Nowell has vaulted K-State to only its third Sweet 16 appearance in the last three-plus decades.
First Team: Drew Timme, Gonzaga
3 of 6
- Jamie Schwaberow/NCAA Photos via Getty Images
From a roster-construction perspective, the remainder of the list is nonsensical. However, since we’re not building a rotation, we’re not plugging guards into a predetermined spot over a more deserving forward or center.
And so, welcome back, Drew Timme!
The longtime Gonzaga star, a B/R first-team member of the 2021 tournament, has surged to another strong start. Timme put up 21 points on Grand Canyon and netted 28 against TCU, and he had a combined 14 rebounds, six assists and four blocks in those victories.
Timme’s next challenge is opposite UCLA, against whom he’s scored 25 and 18 points in two previous games.
First Team: Adama Sanogo, UConn
4 of 6
- C. Morgan Engel/NCAA Photos via Getty Images
In a word: Whew.
Connecticut’s physical forward has straight-up dominated in victories over Iona and Saint Mary’s.
During the opening win, Adama Sanogo shot 13-of-17 for 28 points and secured 13 rebounds. Then, against an elite Saint Mary’s defense, he finished 11-of-16 with 24 points and eight rebounds. He also blocked a shot in both games.
Heading into the Sweet 16, Sanogo has a tournament-best 72.7 field-goal percentage among players with 20-plus shots.
First Team: Trayce Jackson-Davis, Indiana
5 of 6
- C. Morgan Engel/NCAA Photos via Getty Images
Although he assuredly won’t remain a first-team choice, Trayce Jackson-Davis absolutely deserves a place right now.
During the opening round, TJD overpowered Kent State with 24 points on 10-of-17 shooting and corralled 11 rebounds. He also dished five assists and swatted five shots in the win.
Miami eliminated the Hoosiers in the next round, but Jackson-Davis is the reason they had a chance. He tallied 23 points on 7-of-10 shooting, buried nine of his 11 free throws, grabbed eight rebounds and blocked five more shots in what was likely the final game of his IU career.
Jackson-Davis has since informally declared for the 2023 NBA draft.
First Team: Oscar Tshiebwe, Kentucky
6 of 6
- Grant Halverson/NCAA Photos via Getty Images
Similarly, expect a short stay from Oscar Tshiebwe after Kentucky lost to Kansas State in the second round.
But his production was ridiculous.
Tshiebwe scored eight points and grabbed an absurd 25 rebounds with three steals, two assists and two blocks in Kentucky’s victory over Providence. He then contributed 25 points and 18 rebounds, two steals and an assist in the season-ending loss to Kansas State.
The two-time All-American and the 2021-22 National Player of the Year again did everything in his power to carry the ‘Cats. He amassed 30 points and 16 rebounds in UK’s lone tournament game last season.
For the second straight year, however, it still wasn’t enough.
Football Live Score – Sofascore
NCAA Men
Receive notifications for all games in this tournament
284 followers
1 Oct 30 Apr
Details
Matches
Receive notifications for all games in this tournament
284 followers
Upcoming match
Loading. ..
9000 6 Matches with the highest fan rating
Loading…
Loading..
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
League information
Titles 90 005 Denver Pioneers
Active champion (9)
Denver Pioneers
Most titled (9)
Michigan Wolverines
Most titled (9)
facts
Number of opponents64
9000 4 Venue
CountryUSA
About us
NCAA Men is a hockey tournament.
The country in which the NCAA Men is held is called
USA.
Current Denver Pioneers winner.
In addition to NCAA Men information such as standings, results and match lists, SofaScore provides other hockey statistics, odds and results.
NCAA Men
Receive notifications for all games in this tournament
284 followers
1 Oct 30 Apr 9Table
Homes
Guests
Loading. ..
Loading…
League Information
Titles
Denver Pioneers
Defending Champion (9)
Denver Pioneers
Most Titled (9)
Michigan Wolverines 90 005
Most titled (9)
Facts
Number of Opponents64
Venue
CountryUSA
Upcoming Match
Loading…
Top Fan Rated Matches 9 0005
Loading…
Loading…
Loading. ..
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading..
Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…
Top stats
Top Stats show you remarkable stats that certain players achieved in a league match.
#
Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…
Top teams
#
Team
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
The country in which the NCAA Men is held is called
USA.
Current Denver Pioneers winner.
In addition to NCAA Men information such as standings, results and match lists, SofaScore provides other hockey statistics, odds and results.
BLAST.tv Paris Major 2023 CS:GO Tournament – Schedule, Tournament Bracket, Team Roster, Results, Predictions and News”
Paris Major 2023
Paris Major 2023EU RMR AEU RMR BAmerican RMRAsia-Pacific RMREU RMR QualAmerican RMR QualAsia-Pacific RMR QualEU RMR Decider
Date
05/08/2023 – 21 .05.2023
Prize money
$ 1,250 000
Venue
Paris, France
- Challenger Stage (May 8-11):
- Swiss 16 team format
- All best-of-1 matches
- Relegation and qualifying matches stage – bo3
- Top 8 teams advance to Legends Stage
- Bottom 8 teams are eliminated
- Legends Stage (May 13-16):
- Swiss 16 team format
- Full match and best-of-1
- Matches on relegation and advancement to the next stage — bo3
- 8 best teams advance to Champions Stage
- 8 worst teams are eliminated
- Champions Stage (May 18-21):
- Single Elimination Bracket
- All best-of-3 games
ou-match
1/4 finals
18.
05.23 in 16:00
Heroic
2
FaZe
1
19.05.23 at 16:00
GamerLegion 9 0005
2
Monte
0
- 9Apeks 5 ITB
0
Vitality
2
Semi-final
05/20/23 at 16:00
Heroic 4 05/20/23 at 20:30
Apeks
0
Vitality
2
Final
05/21/23 at 18:00
GamerLegion
0
Vitality
9023 6
Schedule
Past
Current
Future
No matches
Participants
Joao felps Vasconcellos
Vinicius v$m Moreira
Adriano WOOD7 Cerate
Lucas Lucaozy Neves
Alan history Lawrence
Denis electroNic Sharipov
Valery b1t Vakhovsky
Ilya Perfecto Zalutsky
Alexander s1mple Kostylev
Andrey npl Kukharsky
Kristoff Goofy Gorsky
Kamil KEI Petkun 9000 5
Katsper Kylar Valyukevich
Victor mynio Kruk
Olek hades Mishkevich
Yury Yuurih Santush
Andrei arT Piovesan
Caike KSCERATO Kerato
Rafael saffee Costa
André drop Abreu
Dion FASHR Derksen
Freddy KRiMZ Johansson
William mezii Merriman
Niko nicoodoz Tamjidi
Fredrik roeJ Jorgensen
Thomas Thomas Utting
Kai CYPHER U otson
Karol rallen Radovic
Sebastian volt Malos
Joe CRUC1AL Steasil
Dan apEX Madeskler
Mathieu ZywOo Erbeau
Emile Magisk Reif
Peter dupreeh Rasmussen
Lotan Spinx Giladi
René TeSeS Madsen
Martin stavn Lund
Jacob Jabbi Nygaard
Rasmus sjuush Beck
Casper cadiaN Møller
Rigon rigoN Gashi
Dionysus sinnopsyy Bu Deca
Flatron juanflatroo Halimi
Sener Sener1 Mahmuti
Gench gxx- Kolgechi
Shimon kRaSnaL Mrozhek
Sergey DemQQ Demchenko
Mukhammed BOROS Malkhas
Vladimir Woro2k Veletnyuk
Victor sdy Orudzhev
Pavel dycha Dykha
Marco Snappi Pfeiffer
Pavle maden Boskovic
Alvaro SunPayus Garcia
Guy Nertz Ilutz
David frozen Chernyansky
Christopher dexter Nong 900 05
Adam torzsi Torzhash
John JDC de Castro
Dorian xertioN Berman
Jay liazz Treguillas
Simon sico Williams
Alistair aliStair Johnston
Declan Vexite Portelli
Josh INS Potter
Gabriel NEKIZ Shenato
wesley hardzao lopez
rodrigo biguzera bittencourt
romeu zevy rocco
felippe skullz medeiros
justin jks savage
rasmus hooxi ni lsen
Nemanja huNter- Kovacs
Nikola NiKo Kovacs
Ilya m0NESY Osipov
Kamil siuhy Shkaradek
Nicholas Keoz Juice
Isak isak Falen
Frederic acoR Gouldstrand
Ivan iM Mihai
Andrey Jerry Mekhryakov
Alexander zorte Zagodyrenko
Vladislav Krad Kravchenko
Alexander Shalfey Marenov
Evgeny r3salt Frolov
Abdul degster Gasanov
Shahar flameZ Shushan
Nikolay niko Christensen
Masey F1KU Miklash
Adam NEOFRAG Zukhar
Joachim jkaem Mirbustad
Tim nawwk Jonasson
Martin STYKO Stick
Giustinas jL Lekavicius
Damjan Kyxsan Stoilkovski
Aleksi Aleksib Virolainen
Ludwig Brollan Brolin
Daniil headtr1ck Valitov
Fredrik REZ Sterner
Christian k0nfig Wieneke
Haakon Hallzerk Fjarli
Michael Grim Vince 9 0005
Ricky floppy Camery
Justin FaNg Cockley
Joni JT Teodosiou
Howard rain Nygard
Helvijs broky Saukants
Russell Twistzz Van Dalken
Finn karrigan Andersen
Robin ropz Kohl
Keith NAF Markovich
Jonathan EliGE Jablonowski
Nick nitr0 Cannella
Joshua oSee Om
Marek YEKINDAR Galinskis
Garidmagnai blitz Byambasuren
Sod bayar Techno4K Monkhbold
Baatarhuu Bart4k Batbold
Tuvshintugs Annihilation Nyamdorzhiy
hasteka
Tournament news
11.