Navy Muscle: Exploring Old Navy Muscle Tees and Naval Power Displays

How do Old Navy Muscle Tees for Women compare to naval muscle flexing. What are the latest developments in naval exercises and military displays. How are China and other nations showcasing their naval prowess.

Old Navy Muscle Tees: A Fashion Statement for Women

Old Navy Muscle Tees have become a popular fashion choice for women seeking comfort and style. These sleeveless tops offer a blend of casual appeal and athletic aesthetics, making them versatile for various occasions. The “muscle” design typically features wider armholes and a looser fit, allowing for greater freedom of movement and a relaxed look.

The appeal of Old Navy Muscle Tees lies in their simplicity and adaptability. They can be easily paired with jeans, shorts, or skirts, making them a go-to option for everyday wear or as part of a layered ensemble. The breathable fabric and sleeveless design make these tees particularly suitable for warm weather or active lifestyles.

Key Features of Old Navy Muscle Tees

• Sleeveless design with wide armholes
• Comfortable, breathable fabric
• Versatile styling options
• Available in various colors and patterns
• Affordable pricing

Are Old Navy Muscle Tees suitable for all body types? These tees are designed to flatter a wide range of body shapes and sizes. The loose fit and strategic cut can help create a balanced silhouette, while the variety of lengths available allows women to choose the most flattering option for their height and proportions.

Naval Muscle: The Power of Modern Navies

While “navy muscle” in fashion refers to comfortable and stylish apparel, in the military context, it takes on a much more literal meaning. Naval muscle represents the strength and capabilities of a nation’s maritime forces. This includes advanced warships, submarines, aircraft carriers, and other naval assets that project power across the world’s oceans.

Modern navies continually evolve their capabilities to address emerging threats and maintain strategic advantages. This evolution involves not only technological advancements but also regular demonstrations of force through naval exercises and parades.

Components of Naval Muscle

1. Advanced warships and submarines
2. Aircraft carriers and naval aviation
3. Amphibious assault capabilities
4. Missile defense systems
5. Naval special forces

How do nations demonstrate their naval muscle? Countries often showcase their naval prowess through large-scale exercises, international collaborations, and military parades. These events serve multiple purposes, including training, diplomatic signaling, and boosting national morale.

U.S.-Australian Naval Exercises: Flexing Maritime Muscles

Recent naval drills conducted jointly by the United States and Australia in the South China Sea have drawn attention to the strategic importance of this region. These exercises, involving the guided-missile destroyer USS Curtis Wilbur and the Royal Australian Navy frigate HMAS Ballarat, demonstrate the ongoing commitment of both nations to maintain a strong presence in contested waters.

The joint operations encompassed a wide range of activities, including:

• Maneuvering drills
• Resupplying vessels
• Cross-deck helicopter operations
• Live-fire gunnery exercises

What is the significance of these naval drills? These exercises serve multiple purposes beyond mere military training. They act as a show of force, reinforcing the principle of freedom of navigation in international waters. Additionally, they strengthen the strategic partnership between the United States and Australia, sending a clear message to regional powers about their shared interests and capabilities.

China’s Response: Diplomatic Tensions and Maritime Claims

China’s reaction to the U.S.-Australian naval exercises highlights the ongoing tensions in the South China Sea region. The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Wang Wenbin, characterized these drills as “flexing muscles,” emphasizing Beijing’s sensitivity regarding activities in waters it claims as its own.

China’s assertion of sovereignty over nearly the entire South China Sea has been a source of regional and international dispute. This claim, represented by the “nine-dash line,” overlaps with the territorial claims of several Southeast Asian nations, including:

• Vietnam
• Philippines
• Malaysia
• Brunei
• Taiwan

How does China justify its claims in the South China Sea? Beijing bases its territorial assertions on historical rights and has sought to reinforce these claims through the construction of artificial islands and military installations in the disputed waters. However, these claims have been rejected by the international community, including a 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague.

The Strategic Importance of the South China Sea

The South China Sea is a critical waterway that holds immense strategic and economic value. It serves as a major shipping route, with an estimated $5 trillion in trade passing through its waters annually. The region is also rich in natural resources, including potential oil and gas reserves, making it a focal point of geopolitical competition.

Key Aspects of the South China Sea Dispute

1. Overlapping territorial claims
2. Freedom of navigation concerns
3. Resource exploitation rights
4. Military build-up and fortification of islands
5. Impact on regional stability and international law

Why is freedom of navigation in the South China Sea crucial for the international community? Maintaining open sea lanes in this region is vital for global trade and economic stability. Any restrictions on maritime traffic could have far-reaching consequences for countries dependent on these shipping routes for imports, exports, and energy supplies.

China’s Naval Ambitions: Showcasing Military Might

As tensions simmer in the South China Sea, China has been actively demonstrating its growing naval capabilities. The country’s plans to showcase new warships, including nuclear submarines and destroyers, at a naval parade marking the 70th anniversary of its navy’s founding, underscore Beijing’s determination to project power in the maritime domain.

This display of naval muscle is part of China’s broader strategy to modernize its military and assert its position as a major global power. The parade is expected to feature a wide array of vessels and technologies, highlighting the rapid advancement of China’s naval forces in recent years.

Highlights of China’s Naval Parade

• Nuclear-powered submarines
• Advanced destroyers
• Aircraft carriers
• Cutting-edge missile systems
• Naval aviation assets

What message does China aim to convey through this naval parade? By showcasing its naval prowess, China seeks to demonstrate its ability to protect its maritime interests, deter potential adversaries, and solidify its status as a naval power capable of projecting force beyond its immediate coastal waters.

The Global Impact of Naval Power Projection

The display and exercise of naval muscle by various nations have far-reaching implications for global security and international relations. As countries invest in expanding and modernizing their naval capabilities, the balance of power in key maritime regions continues to evolve, influencing diplomatic, economic, and military dynamics worldwide.

Naval power projection serves multiple strategic objectives:

1. Protecting national interests and territorial claims
2. Ensuring freedom of navigation in international waters
3. Deterring potential adversaries
4. Supporting allies and partners
5. Responding to humanitarian crises and natural disasters

How does the competition for naval supremacy affect global stability? While naval muscle flexing can lead to increased tensions and the risk of miscalculation, it can also serve as a deterrent against conflict. The complex interplay of naval capabilities among global powers necessitates ongoing diplomatic efforts to maintain regional stability and prevent escalation of maritime disputes.

The Future of Naval Power and Maritime Security

As nations continue to invest in their naval capabilities and engage in displays of maritime strength, the future of naval power and global security remains a topic of intense focus. Emerging technologies, changing geopolitical landscapes, and evolving strategic priorities are shaping the development of naval forces worldwide.

Key Trends in Naval Development

• Increased focus on unmanned systems and artificial intelligence
• Development of hypersonic and long-range precision weapons
• Enhanced submarine capabilities and anti-submarine warfare
• Integration of space-based assets for maritime domain awareness
• Growing importance of cyber warfare in naval operations

What challenges lie ahead for maintaining maritime security? The proliferation of advanced naval technologies among a growing number of nations presents both opportunities and risks. Balancing the need for robust defense capabilities with the imperative of avoiding arms races and escalating tensions will be a key challenge for global leaders and military strategists in the coming years.

As the world’s oceans become increasingly contested spaces, the importance of international cooperation, adherence to maritime law, and diplomatic engagement cannot be overstated. The future of naval power will likely be characterized by a complex interplay of technological innovation, strategic deterrence, and collaborative efforts to address shared maritime challenges.

Boys Myrtle Beach Navy Muscle Tank

Eagles Beachwear is a one-stop shop for all things beach!

We carry tons of beach apparel including sweatshirts, tees/tanks, bathing suits and accessories like hats and bags for both men and women.

At Eagles Beachwear Online, you’ll also find beach chairs, beach umbrellas, beach towels, pool inflatables, beach bags, coolers, body boards, souvenirs and more!

Although we’re based in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina and have over 20+ stores that you can visit in person, you can also order everything you need online at EaglesBeachwear.net.

Customer service is our priority, and we pride ourselves on communicating directly with you, diligently working to answer questions and keep you updated on your orders.

We do our best to ship items out as soon as possible so that you receive your order on time too.

Thanks for shopping! Visit us onFacebook, Twitter or Pinterest and stay updated via email by subscribing here!

We carry top of the line products at Eagles Beachwear from best-selling brands like Rio, Lifeguard, Copa, 24th & Ocean, Bikini Lab, Eidon, Hobie, Intex, Ocean Drive, Maxine, Speedo and many others.

From mugs to cover-ups and hats, have the best summer ever with the largest selection of beach products around!

We’ve got something for everyone:

● 5-Position Ostrich Chair for the adult that likes to sit in the sun

● Giant Sea Turtle Float for the kid who can’t get out of the pool

● Plus Size Swimwear for the busty, curvy and just plain fabulous

● Dreamcatcher Longsleeve Tee for the teen headed to a bonfire

● Puppy Love Pool for the baby just learning how to swim

● Sports Towels & Boards for the athletes and the sports fans

● Beach Canopies for the beachgoers with sensitive skin

If you’re enjoying spring break or family vacation in the Grand Strand area, come and see us at one of our brick-and-mortar stores!

We’ve been in business for almost 35 years since 1981, and we’ve expanded our locations to include Myrtle Beach, Garden City Beach, Oak Island, Surf City, Mount Pleasant, Ocean Isle Beach, and Litchfield Beach.

Keep your eyes open and stop into the closest Eagles Beachwear!

China denounces US-Australian navy drills as muscle flexing

BEIJING (AP) — China on Friday said the U.S. and Australia were “flexing their muscles” with recent naval drills in the South China Sea, underscoring Beijing’s sensitivity over the strategic waterway it claims as its own.

The U.S. Navy’s 7th Fleet said the guided-missile destroyer USS Curtis Wilbur and the Royal Australian Navy frigate HMAS Ballarat concluded a week of joint operations in the South China Sea. Those included maneuvering drills along with resupplying vessels, cross-deck helicopter operations and live-fire gunnery exercises.

“The ships honed their advanced mariner skills in a joint environment while enforcing the normalcy of routine operations throughout the region in accordance with international law,” the Navy said.

At a daily briefing in Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said the two countries should “do things that are conducive to regional peace and stability, instead of flexing their muscles. ”

The U.S. and China’s neighbors have rejected Beijing’s claim to virtually the entire South China Sea, through which an estimated $5 trillion in trade travels each year.

Australia has joined them in expressing concern over China’s growing presence in the South China Sea, most notably through its construction of militarized man-made islands built atop coral reefs in the highly disputed Spratly island group. Taiwan, the Philippines, Brunei, Malaysia and Vietnam have claims that overlap with China’s.

China for its part calls the U.S. naval presence in Southeast Asia the biggest threat to regional security, particularly its insistence on sailing close to Chinese-held territories in what is termed freedom of navigation operations.

In a bid to assuage concerns, Beijing hosted foreign ministers from the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations this week, with Foreign Minister Wang Yi telling them China remained committed to signing a long-stalled code of conduct on activities in the South China Sea to prevent conflicts.

China to show new warships as Beijing flexes military muscle on navy anniversary

QINGDAO, China (Reuters) – China will show off new warships including nuclear submarines and destroyers at a parade next week marking 70 years since its navy’s founding, a senior commander said on Saturday, as Beijing flexes its increasingly well-equipped military muscle.

A female soldier of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy stands guard at a news conference ahead of the 70th anniversary of the founding of Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy, in Qingdao, China, April 20, 2019. REUTERS/Jason Lee

President Xi Jinping is overseeing a sweeping plan to refurbish the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) by developing everything from stealth jets to aircraft carriers as China ramps up its presence in the South China Sea and around self-ruled Taiwan.

The navy has been a key beneficiary of the modernization plan as China looks to project power far from the country’s shores and protect its trading routes and citizens overseas.

Last month, Beijing unveiled a target of 7.5 percent rise in defense spending for this year, a slower rate than last year but still outpacing China’s economic growth target.

Deputy naval commander Qiu Yanpeng told reporters in the eastern city of Qingdao that Tuesday’s naval parade – likely to be overseen by Xi himself, though China has not confirmed that – will feature 32 vessels and 39 aircraft.

“The PLA Navy ship and aircraft to be revealed are the Liaoning aircraft carrier, new types of nuclear submarines, new types of destroyers, as well as fighter aircraft,” Qiu said, without giving details. “Some ships will be revealed for the first time.”

The Liaoning, the country’s first carrier, was bought second-hand from Ukraine in 1998 and refitted in China.

It’s not clear if China’s second carrier, an as-yet unnamed ship developed and built purely in China, will also take part, but in the past few days state media has run stories praising recent sea trials.

Around a dozen foreign navies are also taking part. While Qiu did not give an exact number, China has announced the parade would include ships from Russia, Singapore, India, Thailand and Vietnam – which frequently complains of Chinese military activity in the disputed South China Sea.

China’s last naval battles were with the Vietnamese in the South China Sea, in 1974 and 1988, though these were relatively minor skirmishes.

Chinese navy ships have also participated in international anti-piracy patrols off Somalia’s coast since late 2008.

STRONG NAVY ‘ESSENTIAL’

Qiu reiterated China’s frequent stance that its armed forces are not a threat to anyone and that no matter what happens it will never “pursue hegemony”.

“It is fair to say that the PLA Navy has not brought war or turbulence to any place,” Qiu said.

But China has been scared by its past and needs good defenses at sea, he added.

“A strong navy is essential for building a strong maritime country,” Qiu said. “From 1840 to 1949, China was invaded by foreign powers from the sea more than 470 times, which caused untold suffering and deep wounds to the Chinese nation. ”

China has frequently had to rebuff concerns about its military intentions, especially as military spending continues to scale new heights.

Beijing says it has nothing to hide, and has invited foreign media to cover next week’s naval parade and related activities, including a keynote speech by navy chief Shen Jinlong, who is close to Xi.

Zhang Junshe, a researcher at the PLA’s Naval Research Academy, told reporters after Qiu had spoken that inviting foreign navies to take part in the parade was a sign of China’s openness and self-confidence, noting China had also done this for the 60th anniversary in 2009.

“New nuclear submarines and new warships will be shown – this further goes to show that China’s navy is open and transparent,” said Zhang.

Reporting by Ben Blanchard; Additional reporting by John Ruwitch in SHANGHAI; Editing by Kenneth Maxwell

Muscle Maker Grill Awarded Contract for Two Locations on

Company expands beyond Army and Marine bases into their third military branch with the U. S. Navy

League City, Texas, Oct. 21, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Muscle Maker, Inc. (Nasdaq: GRIL) the parent company of Muscle Maker Grill, Healthy Joe’s & MMG Burger Bar, a fast-casual concept known for serving “healthier for you” meals, today announced that it has reached an agreement with the Navy Exchange Service Command (NEXCOM) to open two Healthy Joe’s locations at two commands on Naval Station Newport (NAVSTA Newport) in Rhode Island. The two commands will be the Surface Warfare Officers School and the Naval Health Clinic. Menu offerings include oven toasted subs, toasted bowls, hot topped salads, and Joe’s Faves – a lineup of signature menu items that include: a grass fed sirloin steak and grilled halloumi cheese toast, the impossibly sloppy made with Impossible^™ plant based protein and avocado toast made with Joe’s handcrafted avocado smash, queso fresco and pepitas.

NAVSTA Newport is home to over 50 U. S. Navy, U.S. Marine Corps, U.S. Coast Guard, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration and U.S. Army Reserve commands and activities. NAVSTA Newport is the Navy’s premier site for training officers, officer candidates, senior enlisted personnel and midshipman candidates, as well as testing and evaluating advanced undersea warfare and development systems. NAVSTA Newport is also the home of the Navy’s most prestigious educational institution, the U.S. Naval War College.

The first Healthy Joe’s location will be at the Surface Warfare Officers School. The Surface Warfare Officers School is coined as the “Center for Excellence” where Surface Warfare officers and senior enlisted leaders sharpen their leadership, management and professional skills throughout their career. The second Healthy Joe’s location on NAVSTA will be at the Naval Health Clinic New England (NHCNE). The NHCNE is a comprehensive health care facility at the south end of the naval complex. It provides a full range of outpatient services for naval shore activities and fleet units of the operating forces, family members of armed services personnel and other authorized beneficiaries. Both locations will have both forward facing customer as well as delivery capabilities.

Michael Roper, CEO of Muscle Maker Grill, commented, “This is a tremendous opportunity for our company. We have been awarded the opportunity to serve some of the Navy’s top personnel while expanding our reach into our third military branch. We look forward to opening these two new locations and expanding our military portfolio. We’ll continue to seek out non-traditional military opportunities as they make sense for our growth plans.”

Muscle Maker recently announced the submission of Major General (retired) Malcolm Frost to the board of directors which will be voted on by the company shareholders for approval at the upcoming annual shareholder meeting on October 27, 2020. Providing healthier alternatives and expanding into all military branch locations is a company goal and the potential addition of Major General (retired) Malcom Frost to the Board of Directors will bring a unique skillset and experience to the Muscle Maker, Inc. brands. The Company will begin the planning and construction process in Q4 with an anticipated opening in Q1/Q2 2021.

About Muscle Maker Grill

Founded in 1995 in Colonia, New Jersey, Muscle Maker Grill features high quality, great tasting food, freshly prepared with proprietary recipes. The menu, created with the guest’s health in mind, is lean and protein based. It features all-natural chicken, grass fed steak, lean turkey, whole wheat pasta, wraps, bowls and more. It also offers a wide selection of fruit smoothies in a variety of assorted flavors, protein shakes and supplements. For more information on Muscle Maker Grill, visit www.musclemakergrill.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release may include “forward-looking statements” pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the U. S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. To the extent that the information presented in this press release discusses financial projections, information, or expectations about our business plans, results of operations, products or markets, or otherwise makes statements about future events, such statements are forward-looking. Such forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “should”, “may,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “expects,” “plans,” and “proposes.” Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements. You are urged to carefully review and consider any cautionary statements and other disclosures, including the statements made under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in documents that we file from time to time with the SEC. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of the document in which they are contained, and Muscle Maker, Inc does not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statements except as may be required by law.

Contact:

Muscle Maker Grill Marketing:
[email protected]

Investor Relations:
[email protected]

Physical Employment Standards for UK Royal Navy Personnel: A Survey of Tasks That Require Muscle Strength and Endurance | Military Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Physical Employment Standards (PES) safeguard the requirement to create a suitable job-person fit in military occupations, and in doing so mitigate some operational and musculoskeletal injury risk. The primary purpose of this research was to identify critical – physically demanding tasks performed by UK Royal Navy (RN) seafarers to inform the development of a muscle strength and endurance-based PES. A secondary purpose was to explore possible sex and age-based differences in subjective ratings of occupational task physical demand.

Materials and Methods

In accordance with the Ministry of Defence Research Ethics Committee, 515 Naval personnel (443 males, 72 females; aged 30.2 ± 7.3 years) completed an anonymous survey that rated the physical demand (from no to very high), criticality (from not to critically important), and frequency (from seldom to several times per day) of 25 common sea-going tasks on a one to five scale. An a priori criteria was applied to down-select a shortlist of the most critical and physically demanding tasks (i.e., median task criticality and task physical demand scores of ≥4, and ≥3, respectively). A Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis test explored sex and age-based differences in subjective physical demand ratings.

Results

Ten (out of 25) tasks met the critical – physical demand criteria, which included the four task categories of fire fighting, damage control, casualty handling, and basic movement/transit tasks. Casualty handling emerged as the single most physically demanding task category performed by seafarers, which was rated to have “high” physical demand (4 on the 1 to 5 scale). Sex and age-based differences in subjective ratings of task physical demand were equivocal, with females rating 3 (out of the 25 tasks), and 40–51 year olds rating 4 (out of 25 tasks) to have a higher physical demand than males and 19–29 year olds, respectively.

Conclusion

Ten criterion tasks were identified and should undergo a further job analysis to inform the development of strength-based PES for the RN.

INTRODUCTION

The Royal Navy is the maritime fighting arm of the UK Armed Forces and is routinely tasked to undertake security, humanitarian aid, and disaster relief during sea-based deployments. The maritime environment is isolated, exposed, and potentially unforgiving, which necessitates that embarked military personnel are self-reliant and possess the technical, physical and psychological ability to respond and overcome emergency scenarios that could pose a threat to life, operations, or organizational assets.

All Royal Navy personnel are expected to be physically capable of undertaking common sea-going tasks such as fire fighting, water ingress damage control and casualty handling. Whilst both physical strength and endurance are recognized as important in the development of military readiness,¹ and underpin role-related tasks in similar physically demanding occupations,^2–4 little evidence exists that describes the characteristics and demands of military Naval tasks performed in a maritime role. Others, have suggested that fire fighting,^5,6 casualty handling and escape/abandonment⁶ were critical Naval maritime tasks, but the emergence of these tasks was not supported by a full job analysis. More recently, a subjective job task analysis was undertaken on Royal Australian Navy personnel,⁷ which also explored survey reporting biases.⁸ Here, 33 common, physically demanding, mostly combat survivability maritime tasks were identified (i. e., replenishment at sea, emergency response, fire fighting, leak stopping and repair, toxic hazard, casualty evacuation), but were not reported in a rank order of physical demand or criticality. Consequently, there is an absence of data within the literature that reports Naval maritime tasks in a hierarchical order of criticality and physical demand for the purpose of informing the development of a Physical Employment Standard (PES).

The process of PES development is regularly adopted by military organizations to safeguard the physical ability required to be operationally effective and mitigate occupational musculoskeletal injury risk, by matching the physical capability of the individual to the physical demands of the job. Here a standardized framework of principles^9–12 prompts a job analysis of role-related tasks, as well as physical aptitude test and cut score development. The initial job analysis phase is fundamental to the identification of physically demanding role-related tasks, the functional movements performed in these tasks, and the breadth of physical fitness abilities that underpin the successful completion of these tasks. Often the full and complete reporting of the job analysis phase is neglected in PES research.¹³

The Royal Navy PES solely tests aerobic fitness. This is achieved via a suite of unloaded, field-based running and walking tests that predict a body mass normalized oxygen uptake cut-score (in ml·kg^-1·min^-1) commensurate with the aerobic requirements of sustained Naval fire fighting tasks.⁵ However, the legitimacy of unloaded, aerobic assessments has been questioned in occupations that involve load carriage (e.g., wearing breathing apparatus, body armor, or backpacks).¹⁴ Furthermore, the majority of occupational tasks performed by other UK military services predominantly involve manual material handling tasks (i.e., 89%),¹⁵ and Naval tasks such as casualty carrying are underpinned by the physical abilities of muscle strength and endurance (and anthropometry).⁶ As such, there is a physical strength assessment gap in the current Royal Navy PES policy, which requires attention and may have implications for female¹⁶ and older personnel. ¹⁷

The primary purpose of the study was to present a hierarchical order of the most critical-physically demanding strength-based tasks performed by Royal Naval personnel, and thereby fill a knowledge gap in this area. A secondary purpose was to investigate if females and older personnel subjectively rate occupational task physical demands higher than males and younger personnel, respectively.

METHODS

Task List Inventory

Individually and remotely, 18 Royal Navy personnel were asked to produce an exhaustive list of occupational tasks performed by seafarers that required “physical strength”. The term “physical strength” was used as a broad, generic term intended to capture any muscle strength and endurance tasks (i.e., muscle strength, power, muscle endurance, or anaerobic capability). The personnel represented all Naval fighting arms (i. e., surface ships, submarines and fleet air arm), as well as a breadth of trades (i.e., marine engineer, weapons engineer, warfare, communications/information specialist, logistician, medical and police). Exactly 200 tasks emerged and were sifted by a panel of three subject matter experts (one officer, two senior ratings) that had served for at least 10 years on surface ships or submarines. Through discussion and consensus duplicate tasks were clustered under relevant task headings, and tasks that did not reflect common duties performed at sea by all personnel were excluded.

Twenty five common tasks emerged that represented six task categories (i.e., fire fighting, damage control, casualty handling, replenishment of ship stores, replenishment of ship ammunition, and basic movement/transit tasks (e.g., climbing into a top bunk)). Prior to distribution, the survey was pilot tested on 30 serving personnel attached to an operational Type 45 Destroyer. Pilot testing resulted in minor amendments to the technical language used in the survey, which was endorsed by the sub-sample prior to distribution.

Survey Distribution

To ensure the variability between Naval roles was accounted for within the survey responses,^8,18 a paper-based survey was strategically posted to 1,000 full time Naval personnel (∼5% of the workforce) that represented the three Naval fighting arms (i.e., surface ships, submarines, fleet air arm). Survey respondents provided informed consent in accordance with the Ministry of Defence Research Ethics Committee. Each survey was visually inspected and excluded if respondents had never been deployed to a frontline platform, hence had a lack role-related experience, or if there was an obvious lack of diligence when completing the survey (e.g., the same score provided for all tasks).

Task Domains and Task Ratings

The 25 tasks were rated across three domains, on a 5-point scale. Task domains were derived from prior subjective job task analysis research,¹⁸ and included task physical demand, task criticality (e.g., in relation to operational success, the preservation of life, injury avoidance), and task frequency (e.g., how often performed). Similar to others,¹⁹ each score on the 1–5 scale was bound to a descriptive term to provide a frame of reference for respondents, as described at Table I.

Task List Hierarchy and Down-Selection

Tasks were ranked hierarchically on “critical – physical demand” (i.e., task criticality and task physical demand scores). The task frequency domain was not used in the development of the task list hierarchy as many time critical and emergency-based occupational tasks are often performed infrequently,¹⁸ which does not undermine the validity of a job analysis.²⁰ A down-selection criteria was applied to identify criterion tasks, that consisted of a median task physical demand rating of ≥3, and task criticality rating was ≥4 on the 1–5 scale (i.e., at least “moderate physical demand”, or “very important”, respectively). The selection criteria was consistent with others that applied a 1– 5 rating scale.^19,21

Statistical Analysis

Data were presented as mean ± one standard deviation (SD), or median and (range). To minimize the loss of data a pairwise deletion approach was applied to missing data. Sex-based differences in task physical demand ratings were explored with a non-parametric Mann-Whitney test at two levels (male, female). Age-based differences in task physical demand ratings were initially explored with a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test at three levels (age 19–29 years, 30–39 years, 40–51 years). Significant results were followed-up with post hoc pairwise comparisons that applied a Bonferroni correction. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Survey Respondents

A total of 606 serving personnel completed the survey (61% response rate). Ninety-one surveys were excluded due to respondents never being deployed to a frontline platform (n = 52), or a lack of diligence when completing the survey (n = 39). Surveys lacking diligence were predominantly completed by personnel that had undertaken previous sea deployments (97%), were junior ratings (82%) and served in the warfare (42%) or air branches (36%).

Five hundred and fifteen questionnaires were available for analysis, which comprised 443 males and 72 females (age 30.2 ± 7.3 years, 10.0 ± 7.4 years Naval service). There was no between-sex difference in age (p > 0.05), but males had undertaken more Naval service than females (10.3 ± 8.2 years vs. 8.2 ± 5.5 years, respectively), p < 0.05. Whilst the sample demographics generally reflected the Royal Navy population, the youngest and least experienced groups may have been over-represented (i.e., 19–29 year olds and junior ratings) (Table II).

TABLE II.

The Demographics of the Study Sample (n = 515) and the Royal Navy Population (n = 22,352).

TABLE II.

The Demographics of the Study Sample (n = 515) and the Royal Navy Population (n = 22,352).

Hierarchy of Task Critical – Physical Demand

Out of the 25 tasks, 10 tasks met the critical – physical demand criteria, which represented four task categories (i.e., casualty handling, fire fighting, damage control, and basic movement/transit tasks).

Two tasks (out of the 10 that met the criteria) had salient task physical demand, and both involved casualty handling (i.e., “casualty handling with a stretcher”, “casualty handling without a stretcher”). These tasks had “high” physical demand and were rated “very important”. Casualty handling tasks were the least frequently performed (i.e., “seldom”) (Table III).

TABLE III.

Common Sea-Going Royal Navy Tasks Subjectively Rated on Task Physical Demand, Task Criticality (a Proportion of all Responses (%)), and Task Frequency (Median (Range)).

TABLE III.

Common Sea-Going Royal Navy Tasks Subjectively Rated on Task Physical Demand, Task Criticality (a Proportion of all Responses (%)), and Task Frequency (Median (Range)).

The eight remaining tasks that met the critical – physical demand criteria were all characterized by “moderate” physical demand and were either classified as “critically important” or “very important”. These tasks consisted of fire fighting (e.g., “drag charged hoses” “lift and carry foam drums”), damage control (e.g., “hoist water pump/ammunition” “lift and carry damage control equipment”), and basic movement/transit (e.g., “opening/closing of hatches”), and were typically performed more frequently on a “monthly” or “weekly” basis (Table III).

With the exception of one down-selected task (i.e., “open/close hatches from above”), ratings of physical demand met or exceeded the threshold criterion (≥ 3 out of 5) in 70–90% of responses. A wider range of responses (52–86%) met the more stringent task criticality criterion (≥ 4 out of 5) (Table III).

A total of 15 tasks did not fully meet the critical – physical demand criteria, hence were excluded. Nine of these tasks were considered borderline as they met the task physical demand criterion, but failed to meet the task criticality criterion. These tasks included more routine tasks (e.g., ship replenishment tasks, mounting ladders). Six tasks did not meet either criteria, and mostly consisted of routine movement/transit tasks (e.g., “getting into and out of top bunk”, “walking and movement in a high sea state”), or very important-low physical demand tasks (e.g., “lift and put on breathing apparatus”) (Table III).

The Influence of Sex and Age on Task Physical Demand Ratings

Sex-based differences in task physical demand ratings were observed in three of the 25 tasks (i.e., “casualty handling with a stretcher”, U = 12,227.50, p < 0.05; “dragging of charged hoses as a fire fighting team”, U = 13,255.50, p < 0.05; “dragging charged hoses as a hose handler”, U = 12,234.50; p < 0.05). Here, the mean ranking of female physical demand scores were higher than compared to males (Table IV).

TABLE IV.

Sex and Age-Based Differences in Subjective Physical Demand Ratings of Common Sea-Going Royal Navy Tasks, Expressed as Median (Range)

TABLE IV.

Sex and Age-Based Differences in Subjective Physical Demand Ratings of Common Sea-Going Royal Navy Tasks, Expressed as Median (Range)

Age-based differences in task physical demand ratings were observed in five of the 25 tasks (i.e., “casualty handling without a stretcher”, H(2) = 9.297, p < 0.05; “movement wearing fire retardant suit and breathing apparatus”, H(2) = 15.404, p < 0.05; “lift and put on breathing apparatus”, H(2) = 17.748, p < 0.05; “climb up and down ladders”, H(2) = 10.590, p < 0.05; “open and close bulkhead doors”, H(2) = 7.029, p < 0.05). The mean ranked physical demand scores were higher for 40–51 year olds compared to the 19–29 year olds in four out of five tasks. The same trend was observed in two tasks for the 30–39 year olds. The opposite trend was observed in one of the most physically demanding tasks (i.e., “casualty handling without a stretcher”), were younger individuals ranked task physical demands higher than older individuals (Table IV).

DISCUSSION

This study short-listed 10 role-related criterion tasks performed by Royal Navy personnel in the maritime environment. Whilst Naval maritime task lists have previously been reported,⁷ and surveyed for bias,⁸ this is the first study to rank the tasks performed in this military role in hierarchical order of critical – physical demand. In addition, this study has added to the limited data that exists on sex and age-based differences in subjective survey task physical demand ratings.

The 25 tasks investigated mostly constituted foundation work activities,²² (i.e., manual handling tasks), which represent 89% of the physically demanding tasks performed by others Services in the UK Armed Forces.¹⁵ Casualty handling was subjectively rated as the single most physically demanding muscle strength and endurance task performed by sea-going personnel in this study. Previously, 4 out of 33 common, physically demanding Royal Australian Navy tasks involved casualty handling,⁷ and muscle strength, power, muscle endurance, anaerobic capability, and anthropometry have emerged as predictors of Naval casualty handling performance.⁶ However, this is the first study to provide evidence to suggest that casualty handling is the single most physically demanding task performed by Naval seafarers. Both casualty handling tasks were the only tasks (out of 25) to receive a “high” physical demand rating. This is not surprising given that these tasks might involve a one or two-person lift of a casualty that might weigh 82 kg (50th percentile) to 105 kg (95^th percentile).²³ Furthermore, the physical demands of this task are exacerbated due to an uneven distribution of a casualty’s body mass in a two-person casualty lift and carry, which can result in the casualty handler at the torso end lifting up to 75% of the casualty’s body mass.²⁴ The requirement for Naval seafarers to conduct casualty handling, and the apparent importance of physical strength when undertaking this task supports the development of a strength-based physical ability test for personnel operating in a maritime environment.

Eight further tasks met the down-selection criteria, which included hose handling, fire fighting, foam drum re-supply, deployment of damage control equipment (e.g., steel and timber shoring posts), hoisting equipment, hatch navigation, and movement in full fire fighting ensembles. These tasks had a “moderate” physical demand (a score of 3 out of 5), which was equivalent to the criterion applied to prison correctional officers,¹⁹ and urban firefighters,²¹ in subjective job analysis surveys. No standardized guidelines exist on the ratings scales that should be applied, or the stringency/leniency of down-selection criteria in PES subjective job task analysis surveys. For example, the physical demand criterion of ≥3 out of 5 in the present study, which is consistent with other studies,^19,21 was more lenient than that applied to emergency service personnel (i.e., ≥5 out of 7).²⁵ Moreover, others have applied a binary “physically demanding” or “not physically demanding” classification to select tasks.²⁶ It is acknowledged that the stringency of task down-selection in the subjective job task analysis phase will be constrained by the time, cost, and logistics of the researcher.¹³ However, it might be prudent not to apply an overly stringent selection criteria at this stage as this may prematurely exclude potentially relevant tasks,²¹ that could be excluded via objective job/physical demands measurements subsequently. For example, if a more stringent physical demand criterion of 4 (and not 3 out of 5) was applied in the present study only two tasks (i.e., casualty handling) would have been down-selected, which would have markedly limited subsequent PES development options.

One study suggested a novel approach to the development of a down-selection criterion for subjective job task analysis rating scales.²¹ Here a physical demand criterion was derived from the reported physical demand ratings of a known low physical demand “calibration” task. This approach might be an elegant solution, assuming the calibration task reflects a task with insufficient physical demand. The use of calibration or control questions also has the utility of making inferences on the quality of survey responses. For example, heterogeneous or outlying data identified in response to a control question with indisputable low physical demand might imply survey respondents exaggerated, provided socially acceptable responses, had poor comprehension, or completed the survey with a lack of diligence. A small proportion of anomalous responses were evident in the present study, where ∼3–4% of responses rated the most physically demanding tasks (casualty handling) to have “no” physical demand (i.e., a score of 1 out of 5). One explanation for this might be that respondents might have mistakenly flipped the scale around. A future consideration would be to include a control question(s) to assess the quality of the data captured, and therefore highlight suspect cases.

Tasks were down-selected on the basis of a combined “critical-physical demand” rating (i.e., task criticality ≥ 4, task physical demand ≥ 3). A strong rationale existed for a combined critical-physical demand criteria, as military organizations must be assured that applicants and incumbents have the physical capability to meet the physical demands of “emergency” role-related tasks. Others have applied equivalent stringency to task criticality and physical demand criteria,^19,21 as well as additional selection criteria not adopted in the present study (e.g., task frequency, task duplication, team and skill-based tasks). Task frequency did not inform the task down-selection in the present study as critical tasks are often performed infrequently in physically demanding occupations,¹⁸ which does not diminish task selection validity.²⁰ This was evident in the present study where casualty handling was the most physically demanding task, but least frequently performed.

Nine tasks were “borderline”, meaning they satisfied the task physical demand criterion, but did not satisfy the task criticality criterion. A characteristic of critical (or essential) tasks is that failure to complete the task to a minimally acceptable standard could result in mission failure, death or injury, and/or damage to Crown property.²⁷ A common characteristic of many of the “borderline” tasks was that they were “routine”, not emergency-based, nor time critical in nature. It has been suggested that both “routine” and “emergency” tasks should be considered in the PES development process.¹² Although a PES developed on “routine” tasks does little to assure military organizations that service personnel can meet the demands of the most critical tasks, it does extend an employers’ duty of care to mitigate injury risk by considering occupational exposure to physical stressors. Time, cost, constraints and prioritization in the PES process,¹³ means that these “borderline” tasks will not advance to subsequent phases of research. Little debate surrounded the fate of six routine ship movement/transit tasks that were excluded (e.g., “door/valve opening”, “ladder climbing”, “movement in a high sea state”, “getting into a top bunk”), which were characterized by the lowest physical demand and criticality ratings.

Sex and age represent two of nine characteristics that are protected under UK Equality legislation²⁸ that should to be considered in the development of a PES. This is supported by a body of evidence that suggests strength-based deficits might exist in simulated job task performance (20–66%), as well as generic measures of upper body (27–54%) and lower body (24–42%) physical strength in females.¹⁶ In addition, ageing can cause physiological and functional declines, exacerbated by chronic health conditions that might result in a decrease in work performance.¹⁷ These sex and ageing related issues have implications for PES implementation, which should receive attention in the PES development process. Consequently, it might seem plausible to hypothesize that subjective sex and age-based differences would exist in ratings of occupational task physical demand, but this was unclear in the present study.

Just three out of 25 tasks in the present study were rated to have more physical demand by females, and four (out of 25) tasks to have more physical demand by the oldest group of respondents compared to the youngest group (i.e., 40–51 year vs. 19–29 year olds). Subjective ratings of physical effort in Royal Australian Navy role-related tasks reported that females rated just one out of 33 tasks to require more physical effort compared with males.⁸ The present study reports new data to suggest that subjective ratings of occupational task physical demand do not appear to have the sensitivity to reflect actual sex and age-based physical ability differences. Possible explanations could be that females undertake lower physical demand roles in team-based, mixed-sex Naval tasks, and older personnel are more likely to be of higher rank, hence perform a more supervisory roles.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations existed in the present study. Firstly, the survey was postal, self-report, and not explained face to face. This meant it was not possible to verify understanding, comprehension and the quality of responses. In the future other methods to administer subjective job task analysis surveys should be explored that contain control questions to verify the quality of responses. Finally, the sex and age-related differences in task physical demand ratings were confounded by many factors that were not controlled for in the present study. This question might be answered more satisfactorily if subjective physical demand scales are completed concurrently during a future objective physical demand studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first study to rank via self-report the critical – physical demand of tasks performed at sea by Naval personnel and suggest casualty handling to be the single most physically demanding muscle strength and endurance-based task performed. Similar with previous work, sex and age-based differences in subjective ratings of task physical demand do not appear to track suggested differences in physical performance ability. The ten criterion tasks down-selected should be interrogated further in subsequent research that objectively measures the physical demands of these tasks, with the aim to develop an occupationally relevant strength-based PES.

Previous Presentation

Poster presentation at the 2nd International Conference on Physical Employment Standards, August 2015, Canmore, Canada.

Funding

This study was funded by the UK Ministry of Defence, who had no involvement in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, or writing of the report.

Acknowledgments

With thanks to the Royal Navy Fitness Test staff at HMS TEMERAIRE, and Anneliese Shaw at the Institute of Naval Medicine.

References

1

Friedl

KE

,

Knapik

JJ

,

Hakkinen

K

, et al. :

Perspectives of aerobic and strength influences on military physical readiness: Report of an international military physiology roundtable

.

J Strength Cond Res

2015

;

29

(

11S

):

S10

–

23

.2

Stevenson

RDM

,

Siddall

AG

,

Turner

PFJ

, et al. :

Physical employment standards for UK firefighters: Minimum muscular strength and endurance requirements

.

J Occup Environ Med

2017

;

59

(

1

):

74

–

9

.3

Siddall

AG

,

Stevenson

RDM

,

Turner

PFJ

, et al. :

Development of role-related minimum cardiorespiratory fitness for firefighters and commanders

.

Ergonomics

2016

;

59

(

10

):

1335

–

43

.4

Taylor

NA

,

Fullagar

HH

,

Sampson

JA

, et al. :

Employment standards for Australian urban firefighters: Part 2: The physiological demands and the criterion tasks

.

J Occup Environ Med

2015

b;

57

(

10

):

1072

–

82

.5

Bilzon

JL

,

Scarpello

EG

,

Smith

CV

, et al. :

Characterization of the metabolic demands of simulated shipboard Royal Navy fire-fighting tasks

.

Ergonomics

2001

;

44

(

8

):

766

–

80

.6

Bilzon

JL

,

Scarpello

EG

,

Bilzon

E

, et al. :

Generic task‐related occupational requirements for Royal Naval personnel

.

Occup Med

2002

;

52

(

8

):

503

–

10

.7

Middleton

KJ

,

Carr

AJ

:

The identification of combat survivability tasks associated with naval vessel damage in maritime environments

.

Appl Ergon

2017

;

59

:

27

–

33

.8

Lee-Bates

B

,

Billing

DC

,

Caputi

P

, et al. :

The application of subjective job task analysis techniques in physically demanding occupations: evidence for the presence of self-serving bias

.

Ergonomics

2016

;

60

(

9

):

1240

–

9

.9

Constable

S

,

Palmer

B

:

The Process of Physical Fitness Standards Development, State of the Art Report

.

Washington, DC

,

Human Systems Information Analysis Centre, US Department of Defense

,

2000

.10

Payne

W

,

Harvey

J

:

A framework for the design and development of physical employment tests and standards

.

Ergonomics

2010

;

53

(

7

):

858

–

71

.11

Reilly

TJ

,

Gebhardt

DL

,

Billing

DC

, et al. :

Development and Implementation of Evidence-Based Physical Employment Standards: Key Challenges in the Military Context

.

J Strength Cond Res

2015

;

29

:

S28

–

33

.12

Tipton

MJ

,

Milligan

GS

,

Reilly

TJ

:

Physiological employment standards I. Occupational fitness standards: objectively subjective?

Eur J Appl Physiol

2013

;

113

(

10

):

2435

–

46

.13

Beck

B

,

Billing

DC

,

Carr

AJ

:

Developing physical and physiological employment standards: Translation of job analysis findings to assessments and performance standards–A systematic review

.

Int J Ind Ergon

2016

;

56

:

9

–

16

.14

Taylor

NA

,

Peoples

GE

,

Petersen

SR

:

Load carriage, human performance, and employment standards 1

.

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab

2016

;

41

(

6

):

S131

–

47

.15

Rayson

MP

:

The development of physical selection procedures. Phase 1: Job analysis

. In:

Contemp Ergonomics

, pp

393

–

97

. Edited by Hanson MA,

London, UK

,

Taylor & Francis

,

1998

.16

Roberts

D

,

Gebhardt

DL

,

Gaskill

SE

, et al. :

Current considerations related to physiological differences between the sexes and physical employment standards

.

Appl Physiol Nutr Metabol

2016

;

41

(

6

):

S108

–

20

.17

Kenny

GP

,

Groeller

H

,

McGinn

R

, et al. :

Age, human performance, and physical employment standards

.

Appl Physiol Nutr Metabol

2016

;

41

(

6

):

S92

–

S107

.18

Larsen

B

,

Aisbett

B

:

Subjective job task analyses for physically demanding occupations: What is best practice?

Ergonomics

2012

;

55

(

10

):

1266

–

77

.19

Jamnik

VK

,

Thomas

SG

,

Shaw

JA

, et al. :

Identification and characterization of the critical physically demanding tasks encountered by correctional officers

.

Appl Physiol Nutr Metabol

2010

;

35

(

1

):

45

–

58

.20

Rayson

M

: JobAnalysis. In:

The Process of Physical Fitness Standards Development, State of the Art Report

, pp

67

–

100

. Edited by

Constable

S

,

Palmer

B

Washington, DC

,

Human Systems Information Analysis Centre, US Department of Defense

,

2000

.21

Taylor

NA

,

Fullagar

HH

,

Mott

BJ

, et al. :

Employment standards for Australian urban firefighters: Part 1: The essential, physically demanding tasks

.

J Occup Environ Med

2015

a;

57

(

10

):

1063

–

71

.22

Cunnigham

JW

:

Generic job descriptors: a likely direction in occupational analysis

.

Mil Psychol

1996

;

8

(

3

):

247

–

62

.23

Pringle

RH

,

Puxley

AJ

,

Puxley

KPM

, et al.  Anthropometry survey of UK military personnel 2006-7 (Issue 3). Qinetiq Report. 2011; QINETIQ/07/01821/3.0.

24

Brown

PEH

,

Fallowfield

J

. The design and validation of a strength-based Royal Navy FitnessTest: Part 2 – A job analysis of the most critically demanding generic tasks performed onboard Royal Navy ships. Institute of Naval Medicine Report.

2013

; 2013.013.25

Larsen

B

,

Graham

T

,

Aisbett

B

:

A survey to identify physically demanding tasks performed during storm damage operations by Australian State Emergency Services personnel

.

Appl Ergon

2013

;

44

(

1

):

128

–

33

.26

Phillips

M

,

Payne

W

,

Lord

C

, et al. :

Identification of physically demanding tasks performed during bushfire suppression by Australian rural firefighters

.

Appl Ergon

2012

;

43

(

2

):

435

–

41

.27

Blacklock

RE

,

Reilly

TJ

,

Spivock

M

, et al. :

Standard Establishment Through Scenarios (SETS): a new technique for occupational fitness standards

.

Work

2015

;

52

(

2

):

75

–

383

.28

Great Britain Parliament

:

Equality Act 2010

: Elizabeth II: Chapter 15.

London, UK

,

Stationary Office

.

© Crown copyright 2019.

90,000 July 25 – Day of the Russian Navy

Day of the Navy of the Russian Federation is celebrated on the last Sunday of July on the basis of the Decree of the President of Russia dated May 31, 2006 No. 549 “On the establishment of professional holidays and memorable days in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.”

In Soviet Russia, this professional holiday was established by the Decree of the Council of People’s Commissars of the USSR and the Central Committee of the VKPB of June 22, 1939, according to which it was to be celebrated annually on July 24.It was postponed to the last Sunday of July in accordance with the decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR dated October 1, 1980 “On holidays and memorable days.”

The Day of the Navy is celebrated not only by the servicemen of these troops, but also by all those who guard the maritime borders of Russia, ensure the combat readiness of ships and units of the Navy, family members of military personnel, workers and employees of naval institutions and enterprises, veterans of the Great Patriotic War and the Armed Forces.

On this day, many commemorative and solemn events, folk festivals and meetings of veterans take place throughout the country. Also, in all cities – naval bases of Russia, military parades are held, and the day ends with festive concerts and fireworks.

The regular military fleet in Russia was created to overcome the territorial, political and cultural isolation, which at the turn of the 17th-18th centuries became the main obstacle to the economic and social development of the state.

The first Russian warship – the frigate “Eagle” – was built during the reign of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich.It was created by Dutch shipbuilders according to their own project, and the name was given to the first Russian military sailing ship in honor of the state emblem.

Read also:

• On July 25, Putin will take part in the launch of a supertrawler in St. Petersburg
• Due to the pandemic, the Navy Day in Sevastopol will be held in an abbreviated format
• In Vladivostok, ships of the Vietnamese Navy will participate in the celebration of the Day of the Navy

In October 1696, the decision of the Boyar Duma legally determined the creation of the Russian fleet and marked the beginning of its construction.By the spring of 1700, 40 sailing and 113 rowing ships were launched.

Having successfully solved the southern problem, Peter I set himself the task of reaching the Baltic Sea coast.

Today, the Navy, being a branch of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, is intended for the armed protection of the interests of the state, for conducting hostilities in the sea and ocean theaters of war. The Navy is capable of delivering nuclear strikes against enemy ground targets, destroying its fleet groupings at sea and at bases, disrupting the enemy’s ocean and sea communications and protecting its maritime transportations, assisting the Ground Forces in operations in continental theaters of military operations, landing amphibious assault forces, participating in repelling assault forces. enemy and perform other tasks.

The Russian Navy includes surface and submarine forces, naval aviation and coastal forces of the fleet (marines and coastal defense forces), as well as ships and vessels, special-purpose units, units and subunits of the rear.

90,000 The expert named the shortcomings of the naval parade in St. Petersburg

The fifth Main Naval Parade in the modern history of Russia took place in St. Petersburg last Sunday. Military columnist for “Newspapers.Ru »Mikhail Khodarenok tells why the last event can be considered rather unsuccessful and how in fact it is necessary to demonstrate the real sea power of the country.

The Main Naval Parade was attended by four thousand naval servicemen, more than 50 ships, boats and submarines, as well as 48 aircraft and helicopters of naval aviation. Without any exaggeration, the ritual turned out to be solemn, colorful and impressive.

At the same time, any parade should serve as a vivid and convincing illustration of the growth of the economic and defense power of the Russian Federation.Does the Main Naval Parade of 2021 meet this criterion?

Close Petersburg

To begin with, let’s formulate a heretical thought – the Neva River and the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland (sometimes ironically called the Marquis Puddle) is not very suitable for demonstrating the sea power of the state.

It is very difficult to bring a ship of large displacement into the Neva, and it is even more difficult to show it on the river in motion.In the best case, a ship of the corvette-frigate class will stand on raid barrels, and in most cases it will be necessary to get out of the river with the help of tugs.

The depths of the Marquis puddle (3-5 meters), in principle, exclude the possibility of placing any significant formations of ships in this part of the Gulf of Finland. Ships here can either move along a few fairways, or be placed at the anchorages of the Kronstadt roadstead (and there is not so much space there either).

For these reasons, mainly boats took part in the passage of the parade formation of ships on the Neva River.The displacement of the largest ships that took part in this ceremony – the large minesweeper “Pavel Khenov”, the missile boat “Dimitrovgrad” and the mine defense ship “Alexander Obukhov” – was 460 tons, 550 and 890 tons, respectively. The missile boat “Odintsovo” – 870 tons can be attributed to the same dimension. For comparison – the displacement of the missile cruiser URO “Ticonderoga” of the US Navy – 9600 tons. Of course, minesweepers cannot be compared with a cruiser. These figures are just for understanding the scale.

And in general, for these reasons, the passage of the parade formation of ships on the Neva River resulted in a kind of regatta of small boats.

Of course, the Russian navy requires ships of different classes, including boats of relatively small displacement, but it is hardly correct to demonstrate this mosquito fleet in the sea capital of the state as a visible evidence of the country’s naval and economic power.

The situation in the Kronstadt roadstead was somewhat better.Particularly impressive were the nuclear-powered submarines – the Project 955 K-549 Knyaz Vladimir strategic missile submarine, the Antey K-266 Orel K-266 Project 949A missile-carrying submarine and the Vepr project 971u K-157 multipurpose submarine.

Large surface ships on the Kronstadt roadstead were mainly represented by Soviet-built ships, among which were the frank grandfathers of the Russian fleet such as the missile cruiser of project 1164 Marshal Ustinov (in service since 1986) and the large anti-submarine ship of project 1155 Vice-Admiral Kulakov (in service since 1981).

There were relatively few new ships (large landing craft “Petr Morgunov” and corvette “Thundering”) on the Kronstadt roadstead. There was no system in this formation of ships – a cruiser, a corvette, a large landing ship, and a mine defense ship were in the same formation.

Therefore, as a conclusion, we can say that the Neva River and the Kronstadt roadstead are poorly suited for demonstrating the sea power of the state.

It is completely impossible to demonstrate ship connections here.For example, 10-12 nuclear submarines of the same project and in a single formation. Or a division of rocket ships. In other words, ships at such parades should be shown in large formations made up of ships of the same type. Otherwise, the impression of the demonstration of the state’s naval power is rather contradictory.

Therefore, the main naval parade of the state should, most likely, be moved to another place, and Severomorsk seems to be the only suitable option here.The length of the Kola Bay reaches 57 km, width – up to 7 km, depth at the entrance – 200-300 meters. There is enough space. One might argue – but what about the audience? However, in the age of television and the Internet, this does not seem to be a problem.

Let’s turn to historical examples. In Great Britain on June 26, 1897 at the Spithead roadstead (in the strait separating the Isle of Wight from Portsmouth) in honor of Queen Victoria’s “diamond jubilee” an impressive armada – 165 ships (including 21 battleships and 42 cruisers) – anchored.In subsequent years, in honor of the coronation of British monarchs, the number of ships in this roadstead reached 300 pennants. And in the Kola Bay even more ships and submarines can easily be accommodated.

Problems not only at sea

As for the flight of the parade group of the fleet aviation over St. 134 (first flight in 1963), Tu-154 (first flight in 1968)? Did you add the parade group to the required number of aircraft with these machines from the Soviet past?

Now a few words about the passage of the pedestrian column.The company parade boxes of the sailors (8 people in a row and 6 deep) on the wide embankment of the city on the Neva looked frankly liquid. The size of the parade battalions should organically correspond to the site on which the solemn march takes place.

For unknown reasons, the parade was reopened by children from Nakhimov – what’s the point, who can explain it? For some reason, the personnel were taken out to the event without weapons, although the carbines would have very much adorned the ceremonial boxes.Unfortunately, the sailors last Sunday did not distinguish themselves with good drill skills. For comparison, the Chinese female military personnel (24 people in a row) at the parades in Beijing with their alignment and combat step resemble a perfectly debugged and flawlessly functioning mechanism. And here – only 8 people in a row and it seems that they just started training last week.

It should be noted that the combined orchestra of the Navy acted in full accordance with the classics of Russian literature – the novel by Mikhail Bulgakov “The Master and Margarita” and the expression – “maestro, cut the march.”The musicians really “cut back” – the solemn march of the foot column of the Navy began with the performance of the German military march “Alte Kameraden” (“Old Comrades”). This is one of the most famous marches, written by the military composer Karl Teike in 1889 in the city of Ulm.

The march is good, to be sure, but in this case, the principle of import substitution should be used as never before.

There is no doubt that the Main Naval Parade in the state should be. But its place and scenario, it is quite possible, need to be revised.Our fleet must visibly represent a mighty and invincible force. The main naval parade should be an even more impressive demonstration of the power of the Russian state. Apparently, this requires a little more work.

The opinion of the author may not reflect the opinion of the editorial board.

Author biography:

Mikhail Mikhailovich Khodarenok – military columnist for Gazeta.Ru, retired colonel.
Graduated from the Minsk Higher Engineering Anti-Aircraft Missile School (1976),
Military Command Academy of Air Defense (1986).
Commander of the S-75 anti-aircraft missile battalion (1980-1983).
Deputy commander of an anti-aircraft missile regiment (1986-1988).
Senior officer of the General Staff of the Air Defense Forces (1988-1992).
Officer of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff (1992–2000).
Graduated from the Military Academy of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces (1998).
Columnist for Nezavisimaya Gazeta (2000-2003), editor-in-chief of the newspaper Military Industrial Courier (2010-2015).

90,000 The main naval parade will be held in St. Petersburg on the Day of the Navy :: Society :: RBK

Photo: Vitaly Nevar / TASS

The main naval parade will be held in St. Petersburg in honor of the Day of the Navy.Navy Day is celebrated on the last Sunday of July, this year also marks the 325th anniversary of the formation of the Russian fleet.

18 ships and boats will take part in the main parade. They will pass along the Neva in the center of St. Petersburg, the Ministry of Defense previously reported. 48 aircraft will fly over the city. Another 11 ships and four submarines, including ships from India, Iran and Pakistan, will march off the coast of Kronstadt.

Ships of India and Iran took part in the dress rehearsal of the Navy parade

In addition, at 22 o’clock local time, a festive fireworks will take place in Kronstadt, it will begin at the signal of a cannon from the Peter and Paul Fortress.A cannon shot will be fired by the students of the Nakhimov Naval School.

This year the main maritime parade in St. Petersburg will be held without spectators. According to the head of the city Rospotrebnadzor Natalia Bashketova, they decided to take this step in order to reduce the risk of people contracting coronavirus infection. The city authorities offer to follow the event through video broadcasts.

Don youth will talk about the importance of the navy | SOCIETY: Events | SOCIETY

The Russian Navy will celebrate its 325th anniversary on October 30.Grigory Fomenko, Chairman of the Committee on Military Affairs of the Legislative Assembly of the Rostov Region, spoke about the importance and historical development of the fleet in the state.

The regular fleet “There will be ships for sea” was created by the decree of Peter I in 1696.

“Today we wanted to tell our youth how the first fleet was born and developed. Because some people in our country, even adults, think that Peter I learned how to make ships abroad, he built everything there and sailed back on them, but this is not so, ”Fomenko noted.

According to him, these ships were built in the current Voronezh region. By 1696, the country already had its own fleet. Thanks to this, it was possible to take the Azov fortress during the second siege.

In addition, Grigory Fomenko stressed that the fleet was one of the branches of the Russian armed forces.

“Black Sea sailors covered themselves with unfading glory, defending the freedom and independence of the Motherland during the Great Patriotic War. Thanks to the courage and heroism of the sailors, Russia, having established itself in the southern seas, was able to turn into a powerful state, whose opinion the leading world powers began to reckon with, ”he said.

In turn, the head of the public organization “Rostov-on-Don Maritime Assembly” Alexander Rybalko added: “During the Great Patriotic War, the Azov flotilla made a worthy contribution to the defeat of Nazi Germany. And now the large landing ship “Azov”, the home port of which is the city of Sevastopol, has been the most welcome guest at the celebration of the Day of the City of Azov for many years. I am also pleased to note that the Russian Black Sea Fleet includes a newly built submarine called Rostov-on-Don. “

Together, the meeting participants decided to appeal to the deputies of the Legislative Assembly with a proposal to tell young people about the history and modern role of the Russian Navy, to conduct lessons of courage in educational institutions of the region.

90,000 Naval warships were laid down • President of Russia

The laying ceremony took place at the Sevmash enterprises in Severodvinsk, Admiralty Shipyards in St. Petersburg and Amursky
shipyard “in Komsomolsk-on-Amur.The mortgage boards are installed on the nuclear submarine cruisers “Knyaz Potemkin” and “Dmitry Donskoy”, large submarines “Mozhaisk” and “Yakutsk”, corvettes “Grozny” and “Buyny”.

* * *

Speech
at the ship-laying ceremony

V. Putin: Dear friends, good afternoon!

I am of all shipbuilders and military
I congratulate seamen of Russia on a new important stage in the development of the Naval
The fleet of our country – with the beginning of the construction of the next series of modern ships.

Today in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, two
multipurpose ships of the near sea zone, and at the “Sevmash” and at the “Admiralty shipyards” – four submarines
far sea zone.

We preserve the glorious traditions of the Russian fleet, strengthen the continuity of the unbreakable thousand-year
history of Russia, so two new nuclear-powered submarines will bear the names of Dmitry
Donskoy and Prince Potemkin as a sign of deep respect for memory and exploits
our outstanding ancestors.

Two large diesel
submarines were named after the cities – “Mozhaisk” and “Yakutsk”, and two
the multipurpose ships were given the names traditional for the Russian fleet – “Grozny” and “Buyny”.

I would like to emphasize that all ships will be equipped with a modern high-precision
weapons, state-of-the-art controls and communications.
The effectiveness of most of them was confirmed during the execution of combat
tasks in Syria.

I have said it more than once and I want to
reiterate: a strong, sovereign Russia
you need a powerful, balanced
Navy. Today he plays a key role in the security management system.
state, reliably protects our national interests, makes a significant contribution
in strengthening strategic parity and international stability.

We will further develop the naval
Russia’s potential, improve the basing system and fleet infrastructure,
equip ships with the latest weapons and equipment, work out complex
combat training tasks during exercises and on long sea voyages, to carry out
“Demonstration” of the Russian flag in strategically important areas of the World Ocean.

Such responsible and large-scale tasks are due to
the geopolitical position of our country, its role in world affairs.
Construction of a high-tech combat-ready
The Navy places high demands on Russian shipbuilders,
shipbuilders.

I want to thank everyone who is involved in this huge,
very important work for our country, to thank the workers, engineers of our
shipyards, all your colleagues, dear comrades, employees of our design bureaus for a clear and well-coordinated work. Despite the limitations,
caused by the epidemic, you actively increased the pace of construction of modern
ships and support vessels, moreover, as much as possible reduced the time of their
entering service in the Navy.

In the coming years, you will have a serious
work on the implementation of the tasks of the state defense order, on the implementation
plans outlined in the state program
weapons, so that after six
years, in 2027, share
modern ships in the Navy has reached 70 percent.

I am sure that
shipbuilders, sailors will continue to adequately fulfill the set
tasks, will make every effort to
so that our Navy will be replenished with modern ships, and Russia will continue to be one of the leading maritime powers.

I wish labor
new significant results for the teams of your enterprises. thank you very much
to work.

Please, please
you colleagues.

(The laying ceremony of the Navy’s warships.)

Dear friends!
Dear Colleagues! Comrades!

Congratulations on the large-scale work on the development of the Russian Navy.This is another
a serious step in strengthening the security of the Russian state.

I am sure that the workers,
engineers, sailors who will be present and accompany
the construction of new warships, of course, will perfectly cope with the assigned tasks.

I wish you every success.

Thank you. All the best.

See also

Vladivostok celebrates Navy Day – News – Events

Today, July 25, , Russia celebrates the Day of the Navy.Traditionally, festive events in honor of the professional holiday of officers and sailors will take place in all port cities of the country, including Vladivostok.

The parade of ships of the Pacific Fleet in the Golden Horn Bay has become a traditional component of the festive program of the Day of the Navy. As specified in the Russian Ministry of Defense, the Corvette “Perfect” took the first place in the ranks, followed by the missile cruiser “Varyag”, the large anti-submarine ship “Admiral Tributs”, the small anti-submarine ship “Sovetskaya Gavan” and the submarine “Ust-Kamchatsk”.In addition, two rocket frigates of the Naval Forces of the Republic of Vietnam “Tran Hung Dao” and “Quang Chung” are taking part in the parade line. They also arrived in Vladivostok to participate in the celebration of the Day of the Navy. Thus, a total of seven warships are participating in the celebrations.

The department also emphasized that preparations for the celebration of the Day of the Navy were carried out in strict compliance with the command of large formations, formations and military units of a set of measures to counter the threat of the spread of coronavirus infection, aimed at preserving the life and health of military personnel, civilian personnel and their families.100% of the personnel of the crews of ships and vessels are vaccinated in advance. All participants in the festive events are under the close supervision of military doctors.

Residents of Vladivostok can watch the live broadcast of the holiday on OTV-Prim. The broadcast will be on July 25 from 9.45 to 14.00 and from 19.00 to 22.10. It can also be viewed at the link.

In addition, those who wish can see the holiday in the daytime live on the official accounts of the Government of the Primorsky Territory in social networks: Odnoklassniki and VKontakte.In the evening, including during the fireworks, the broadcast will also be conducted on both pages: Odnoklassniki and Vkontakte.

Program of the Navy Day celebration in Vladivostok:

10.00-11.00 – Naval parade of ships of the fleet and ships of foreign states;

11.00-17.00 – broadcast of musical compositions, information messages, films about the fleet, announcement of evening performances;

17.00-17.30 – concert from VIA Marines of Russia;

17.45-18.15 – concert of the Song and Dance Ensemble of the Border Directorate of the FSB of Russia in the Primorsky Territory;

18.40-19.20 – concert of the Military Orchestra of the Pacific Fleet Headquarters;

20.00-21.00 – theatrical and historical musical block from the Drama Theater of the Pacific Fleet and the Song and Dance Ensemble of the Pacific Fleet;

21.00-21.30 – light defile of high-speed boats “BL-680” to the accompaniment of the Pacific Fleet Song and Dance Ensemble;

21.30-22.00 – concert program of the Pacific Fleet Song and Dance Ensemble;

22.00-22.10 – festive fireworks dedicated to the Day of the Russian Navy, accompanied by the Pacific Fleet Song and Dance Ensemble;

22.10-23.00 – continuation of the concert program of the Pacific Fleet Song and Dance Ensemble. Performance of the final songs, among which – “St. Andrew’s flag proudly flies”, “Our fleet”, “We are Pacific Ocean” and “Farewell to the Slav.”

According to the information of the Government of Primorye

The Navy is the pride and stronghold of Russia!

Chairman of the Moscow City Duma Alexey Shaposhnikov , United Russia faction:

“Dear sailors, officers, foremen, sailors, veterans of the Baltic, Northern, Black Sea and Pacific fleets, the Caspian flotilla! On behalf of the deputies of the Moscow City Duma, I congratulate you on the Day of the Russian Navy!

Since the time of Peter the Great, the Navy has been the pride and stronghold of Russia, it serves as the guarantor of the security of the country’s maritime borders and reliable protection of our national interests.

Naval sailors continue the best naval traditions, they have always been distinguished by professionalism, courage, impeccable discipline, nobility and devotion to the naval brotherhood.

Today, each of you is performing an important combat mission to preserve peace and stability on the Russian borders.

We wish the sailors, officers and veterans of the Navy good health, success in service and a peaceful sky! ”

Deputy Chairman of the Moscow City Duma, head of the United Russia party faction in the Moscow City Duma Stepan Orlov :

“I congratulate everyone on the Day of the Russian Navy!

We celebrate this holiday with a sense of special pride for our country – a great maritime power, for the officers and sailors who are guarding its sovereignty and security.The Russian fleet has always been and remains a reliable guarantor of the power of the state and its national interests.

We are proud of our sailors – strong, courageous people belonging to a special brotherhood, which is sealed by unbreakable bonds: devoted service to the Fatherland, sea romance and real naval mutual assistance.

With all my heart I wish the active sailors and officers, veterans of the naval fleet truly good health, good and prosperity! Always – on roadsteads or on long hikes – you have seven feet under the keel.Happy Holidays! ”

Representative of the Moscow City Duma in the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, Chairman of the Federation Council Committee on Social Policy Inna Svyatenko , United Russia faction (in the Moscow City Duma):

“Today the Navy is 325 years old! Dear admirals and officers, warrant officers and foremen, sergeants and sailors, civil servants, daughters and wives, residents of naval bases, I congratulate you on the holiday!

I wish everyone for whom service in the navy has become their destiny health, prosperity and new successes for the good of Russia! ”

Leader of the Communist Party faction in the Moscow City Duma Nikolay Zubrilin :

“Today is Navy Day! Congratulations to sailors, foremen, midshipmen, crews of combat and patrol ships, airborne and assault units, submariners and marines, engineer battalions and rescue services, as well as all support and technical support services in the Navy on this holiday!

I wish you all success in the naval and military service, skillfully and competently apply the entrusted military equipment and the acquired knowledge to guard and defend our sea borders!

I wish you, our dear defenders, good health, happiness, good luck, all the best and seven feet under the keel! ”

Chairman of the MHD Commission on Urban Development, State Property and Land Use, Head of the permanent deputy association “My Moscow” in the Moscow City Duma Elena Nikolaeva :

“Happy Navy Day to all who serve or have served in the Navy, who are proud of its traditions and history!

On this day, the Russian fleet in parade line demonstrates all its beauty and power in St. Petersburg and Sevastopol, Arkhangelsk and Vladivostok, Kaliningrad and Severomorsk, in all our “naval” cities!

For me, this parade is an inspiring spectacle, I am proud of the Russian fleet, which has not lost age-old maritime traditions, and I think that Russia was able in all military and historical vicissitudes to preserve its lands and access to the sea, naval bases and domestic shipbuilding, and most importantly, Russian sailors loyal to the sea and power.

I wish all officers and warrant officers, sailors and employees of the Navy peace and stability, health and prosperity to their families! Easy service, reliable rear and seven feet under the keel! ”

Leader of the A Just Russia faction in the Moscow City Duma Magomet Yandiev :

“Congratulations on the Day of the Russian Navy to all seamen and those involved in the fleet!

For our country, this day is of great importance, since the Navy has played a very important role in many wars, protecting the borders.

Thank you for your courage, I wish you good health, a calm sea and a fair wind! ”

Chairman of the Moscow State Duma Commission on Security, Sports and Youth Policy Kirill Shchitov , faction of the United Russia party:

“Our country has the longest maritime border in the world with access to three oceans. Therefore, the Russian Navy is a pillar of state security, its sovereignty and territorial integrity.

We are proud of the great history of the Russian fleet, its impeccable service to the Motherland.

The tasks that the Russian Navy is currently solving require advanced knowledge and skills, high professionalism, and great personal courage from the personnel.

Thank you for protecting our maritime borders. Wish you seven feet under the keel and peaceful service! Good health and prosperity to you and your loved ones! ”

Member of the Moscow State Duma Commission on Security, Sports and Youth Policy Viktor Maksimov , Communist Party faction:

“Dear sailors and foremen, warrant officers, officers and admirals, veterans and all citizens of Russia, I sincerely congratulate you on one of the most significant professional holidays – the Day of the Navy!

For 325 years, the Navy has been guarding the borders of our Motherland, selflessly defending state interests at sea, preserving and enhancing the traditions of the Russian army, while demonstrating high morale and combat readiness.

Today is a holiday of heroes who served our country with faith and truth. Day of those who serve her with the same devotion even now, near the borders and far from their native lands.

With all my heart I want to wish all the sailors, their families and friends good health, happiness and prosperity. ”

Member of the Moscow State Duma Commission on Security, Sports and Youth Policy Maria Kiseleva , permanent deputy association “My Moscow”:

“Day of the Russian Navy is a professional holiday for those who have found their vocation in the service on the maritime borders of our country, in the surface and submarine forces, naval aviation, coastal troops and shipbuilding.

I congratulate all veterans and those in the service in raids on this holiday! I wish you good health, success, happiness and prosperity for many years to come!

You are an example of courage and courage. Thank you for your professionalism, for your daily work in difficult conditions, for giving us a sense of confidence and security. May this holiday always be peaceful! ”

Help.

The birthday of the Russian Navy is considered October 20 (30th according to the new style) in 1696, when the Boyar Duma approved the decree of Peter I on the creation of a regular fleet “There will be ships for sea”.

On July 25, 2021, naval parades are held in St. Petersburg, Sevastopol, Kaspiysk, Severomorsk, Baltiysk, Vladivostok and Tartus (Syria). In total, up to 200 warships of various classes, about 80 aircraft, more than 100 units of military equipment, up to 15 thousand military and civilian personnel take part in the parades.

On the eve of the Navy Day in 2021, during a working trip to Sevastopol, Moscow City Duma deputies visited the guards order of Nakhimov missile cruiser Moskva.Chairman of the Moscow City Duma Alexei Shaposhnikov presented the leadership of the battleship with the anniversary awards of the capital’s parliament.

On this topic in the media:

325 years of trials and victories – the history of the Russian fleet

Navy Day in 2021: history and traditions of the holiday

The main naval parade will show the priority directions for the development of the Russian Navy.