What makes ECD Hero Mesh 12D Goalie Semi Soft stand out. How does it compare to other top goalie mesh options. What are the key factors to consider when choosing goalie mesh. Discover the pros and cons of this popular lacrosse goalie mesh option.
The Evolution of Lacrosse Goalie Mesh: Why 12-Diamond Dominates
In the ever-evolving world of lacrosse equipment, goalie mesh has undergone significant changes. Today, 12-diamond goalie mesh reigns supreme, largely displacing the once-popular 17 and 20 diamond variants. But why has this shift occurred?
12-diamond mesh offers a perfect balance of control, durability, and performance that modern goalies demand. Its larger diamonds provide enhanced ball stopping power while maintaining the necessary flexibility for quick outlet passes. This mesh type has proven to be versatile enough to suit various playing styles and skill levels.
The Decline of Micro, Soft, and Hard 17/20 Diamond Mesh
While innovation may breathe new life into these options in the future, current trends show a clear preference for 12-diamond mesh among lacrosse goalies. The reasons for this shift include:
- Improved ball control with larger diamonds
- Better durability and longevity
- Easier break-in period
- More consistent performance across varying weather conditions
ECD Hero Mesh 12D Goalie Semi Soft: A Comprehensive Analysis
East Coast Dyes (ECD) has made a significant impact on the lacrosse mesh market with their Hero Mesh 12D Goalie Semi Soft option. This mesh has garnered attention for its unique combination of features designed to enhance goalie performance.
Key Features of ECD Hero Mesh 12D
- Soft and lightweight construction
- Wax coating for weather resistance
- Large diamonds for improved ball stopping
- Semi-soft texture for optimal control
How does the ECD Hero Mesh 12D Goalie Semi Soft perform in crucial areas? Let’s break down its performance across five key categories:
Rebound Control: 5/5
The ECD Hero Mesh excels in rebound control, earning a perfect score. Its large diamond pattern, combined with the wax coating, allows the mesh to mold around the ball upon impact. This characteristic significantly reduces unwanted rebounds, giving goalies a decisive advantage in controlling shots.
When strung properly with a deep pocket, the mesh effectively slows down the ball upon contact. This feature is particularly beneficial for goalies facing high-velocity shots, as it provides that crucial split-second needed for secure ball control.
Longevity: 5/5
Durability is a critical factor for any piece of lacrosse equipment, and the ECD Hero Mesh doesn’t disappoint. The wax coating serves a dual purpose – not only does it enhance performance, but it also significantly reduces abrasion on the mesh fibers.
Real-world testing has demonstrated the impressive longevity of this mesh. In one notable instance, a Division I goalie used the same piece of ECD mesh from the beginning to the end of the 2015 season without replacement. This level of durability is a testament to the quality of materials and construction used in the ECD Hero Mesh.
Ease of Stringing: 2.5/5
While the ECD Hero Mesh excels in many areas, stringing can present some challenges. The combination of large diamonds and the wax coating can make it tricky to achieve the desired pocket depth and shape.
Stringers may find that creating anything other than a low pocket can be difficult, potentially leading to excessive whip in the completed stick. This characteristic requires careful attention and potentially more experience to string effectively.
Break-In Period: 5/5
Despite its wax coating, the ECD Hero Mesh is surprisingly easy to break in. The mesh stretches readily, allowing goalies to form their perfect pocket with minimal effort. This quick break-in period is a significant advantage, especially for players who need their equipment to perform optimally right away.
Maintenance: 2.5/5
The maintenance requirements for the ECD Hero Mesh present a mixed bag. On one hand, the wax coating effectively repels dirt and moisture, keeping the pocket cleaner for longer. However, the mesh has a tendency to “bag out” or stretch over time, which can affect the pocket’s performance.
Many goalies find themselves needing to adjust their pockets frequently, especially during intensive periods like summer tournaments. While this isn’t uncommon for goalie mesh in general, it’s an important factor to consider when choosing the ECD Hero Mesh.
Comparing ECD Hero Mesh to Other Top Goalie Mesh Options
To truly understand the value proposition of the ECD Hero Mesh 12D Goalie Semi Soft, it’s essential to compare it to other leading options in the market. Let’s examine how it stacks up against three other popular choices: JimaLax, Throne, and StringKing Grizzly.
JimaLax 12 Diamond Goalie Mesh
JimaLax offers a 12 diamond goalie mesh known for its hard coating and large diamonds. How does it compare to the ECD Hero Mesh?
- Durability: Both meshes offer excellent longevity
- Feel: JimaLax provides a firmer feel compared to ECD’s softer touch
- Weather Resistance: JimaLax’s hard coating may offer superior all-weather performance
- Break-In: ECD’s mesh typically breaks in faster than the harder JimaLax option
Throne 12 Diamond Goalie Mesh
Throne’s offering features a wax coating similar to ECD, but with smaller diamonds. Key differences include:
- Diamond Size: Throne’s smaller diamonds may offer more precise ball control
- Stringing Ease: Throne’s mesh is generally easier to string than ECD’s
- Rebound Control: ECD’s larger diamonds may provide slightly better rebound dampening
- Break-In: Both meshes break in quickly due to their wax coatings
StringKing Grizzly Goalie Mesh
StringKing takes a different approach with their Grizzly mesh, offering an ultra-light, non-coated option. How does it stack up?
- Weight: StringKing Grizzly is noticeably lighter than ECD Hero Mesh
- Weather Performance: ECD’s wax coating may provide better consistency in wet conditions
- Durability: StringKing’s FlexLiteâ„¢ fibers aim to control stretching, potentially reducing bagging out
- Feel: Grizzly offers a more natural feel without coating, while ECD provides a softer touch
Choosing the Right Goalie Mesh: Factors to Consider
Selecting the perfect goalie mesh involves weighing various factors based on your individual needs and preferences. Here are some key considerations to keep in mind:
Playing Style and Skill Level
Your playing style and skill level should heavily influence your mesh choice. Are you a beginner who needs forgiving mesh that’s easy to use? Or are you an advanced player looking for maximum control and feel?
- Beginners may benefit from softer mesh like ECD Hero for easier ball stopping
- Advanced players might prefer firmer options like JimaLax for precise ball control
- Players focused on quick clearing passes might lean towards lighter options like StringKing Grizzly
Weather Conditions
The climate you typically play in can significantly impact mesh performance. Consider these factors:
- Humid environments: Wax-coated meshes like ECD and Throne resist moisture better
- Cold climates: Softer meshes may become too stiff, making harder options more consistent
- Frequent rain: Look for meshes with excellent water resistance to maintain consistency
Maintenance Requirements
How much time are you willing to invest in maintaining your pocket? Different meshes have varying maintenance needs:
- Low maintenance: Coated meshes like ECD and Throne resist dirt and moisture better
- Frequent adjustments: Softer meshes may require more regular tweaking to maintain pocket shape
- Durability: Consider how often you’re willing to replace your mesh
Maximizing Performance with ECD Hero Mesh 12D Goalie Semi Soft
If you’ve decided that the ECD Hero Mesh 12D Goalie Semi Soft is the right choice for you, here are some tips to get the most out of your new mesh:
Optimal Stringing Techniques
Given the unique characteristics of the ECD Hero Mesh, consider these stringing tips:
- Aim for a mid to low pocket to complement the mesh’s natural tendencies
- Use a bagged-out piece of mesh for initial stringing to account for potential stretching
- Experiment with different sidewall patterns to find the ideal balance of hold and release
- Consider using a slightly tighter top string to help control the depth of the pocket
Breaking In Your New Mesh
While the ECD Hero Mesh breaks in relatively quickly, you can speed up the process:
- Wall ball sessions focusing on catching in different pocket areas
- Gradually increase shot velocity as the pocket forms
- Use a ball roller or lacrosse ball to manually work the mesh
- Avoid excessive force that might over-stretch the mesh
Maintenance Best Practices
To keep your ECD Hero Mesh performing at its best:
- Regularly check pocket depth and adjust as needed
- Clean the mesh with a damp cloth to remove dirt and debris
- Store your stick in a cool, dry place to prevent unwanted stretching
- Consider re-applying a light coat of wax periodically to maintain weather resistance
The Future of Goalie Mesh: Innovations on the Horizon
As lacrosse equipment continues to evolve, what can we expect for the future of goalie mesh? Several exciting trends are emerging:
Advanced Materials
Manufacturers are exploring new synthetic fibers and coatings to enhance mesh performance. We may see:
- Ultra-lightweight materials that maintain durability
- Smart fibers that adapt to temperature and humidity
- Improved coatings for even better weather resistance
Customization Options
The trend towards personalization is likely to impact goalie mesh as well:
- Mesh with variable diamond sizes within a single piece
- Color-changing mesh for visual feedback on pocket wear
- 3D-printed mesh patterns for ultimate customization
Integration with Technology
As sports and technology continue to merge, goalie mesh may see some high-tech additions:
- Embedded sensors to track shot speed and pocket deformation
- AR-compatible mesh for training applications
- Self-adjusting pockets that maintain optimal depth
ECD Hero Mesh 12D Goalie Semi Soft: The Verdict
After a thorough analysis, it’s clear that the ECD Hero Mesh 12D Goalie Semi Soft offers a compelling package for many lacrosse goalies. Its standout features include:
- Excellent rebound control
- Impressive durability
- Quick break-in period
However, potential users should be aware of its challenges:
- Can be difficult to string effectively
- Requires regular maintenance to maintain pocket shape
Is the ECD Hero Mesh 12D Goalie Semi Soft the right choice for you? Consider your playing style, skill level, and maintenance preferences. For many goalies, especially those who prioritize soft hands and rebound control, this mesh could be an excellent fit.
Remember, the best mesh is ultimately the one that helps you perform at your peak. Whether that’s the ECD Hero Mesh or another option, the key is to find the mesh that complements your skills and helps you make those game-winning saves.
Goalie Mesh Review by Van O’Banion
Editor’s Note: Welcome to a Goalie Mesh Review, written by long-time stringer Van O’Banion! Van has been around the stringing game for what seems like an eternity, and has been around long enough that Connor (old man that he is) learned a TON from Van’s old tutorials. It’s all true. Check out what Mr. O’Banion has to say about that all-important goalie mesh!
Goalie Mesh Review by Van O’Banion
I have excluded all Micro, Soft, and Hard 17 diamond and 20 Diamond Mesh due to the fact that very few lacrosse goalies are using them anymore. Maybe innovation can change this fact, but for now we are focusing on what matters most, which is the 12-diamond goalie mesh, which currently dominates the market. For this Goalie Mesh Review, I looked at the following four types of 12 diamond mesh*:
- East Coast Dyes 12 Diamond Goalie Mesh
- JimaLax 12 Diamond Goalie Mesh
- Throne 12 Diamond Goalie Mesh
- Stringking Grizzly Goalie Mesh
*Disclaimer: Stylin’ Strings only uses the highest quality stringing materials in our pockets. This article is an informative comparison meant to educate players on the differences between the various offerings of mesh so that they can make an informed decision when choosing their next pocket. At the end of the day, there is no winner, just four different options to choose from.
Get Early Access
“*” indicates required fields
Ranking System – Numbers 1 to 5 are used with “5” being the best rating.
Overall unique points for each mesh piece:
- East Coast Dyes Soft, Light, & Wax Coated, Large Diamonds
- Jimalax Hard Coating, Large Diamonds
- Throne Wax Coating, Smaller Diamonds
- StringKing Grizzly Ultra-light, Non-coated, Large Diamonds woven from FlexLite™ fibers to control stretching.
Categories Reviewed:
- Rebound The amount of give a goalie pocket has directly affects how the ball will project after it hits the mesh at a high velocity
- Longevity The length of time that the mesh will last, also known as durability.
- Ease of Stringing The degree of difficulty using the mesh to make a functional channeled pocket with the correct amount of whip.
- Break In The time and effort it takes to form and soften the mesh to the peak of its life.
- Maintenance The amount of time and difficulty to keep the pocket with correct whip, and shape.
East Coast Dyes
- Rebound 5 /5 A Large diamond wax coated mesh. When strung properly, with a deep pocket, will mold and slow down the ball when contact is made resulting in less rebound.
- Longevity 5 / 5 The wax coating on the mesh provides little to no abrasion which bodes well for goalies. A big time D1 goalie for the 2015 season used the same piece of East Coast mesh in the beginning season as the end. We saw it with our own eyes.
- Ease of Stringing 2.5 / 5 The diamond size mixed with a wax coating makes this mesh difficult to string correctly. It can lead to anything but a low pocket to whip out easily.
- Break In 5 /5 Wax coated, yet very easily stretched. It does not take much work to form your perfect pocket.
- Maintenance 2.5 / 5 The thinner of the wax mesh repels dirt and moisture however bags out quite easily. The mesh changes over time requiring constant maintenance. We have done this for many goalies over the summer at tournaments.
Throne of String
- Rebound 4.5 / 5 A thick wax coated base of mesh. Due to the thickness of the wax and size of the diamonds doesn’t give as well as other mesh when hit with a ball at a high velocity. However this difference is minimal and the overall quality makes this mesh one of the tops in the industry.
- Longevity 5 / 5 This mesh receives the highest rating due to it’s similar qualities to Jimalax 12 diamond, as well as the thick wax coating which has created a time tested sturdy mesh that we personally have never seen rip or break.
- Ease of Stringing 4 / 5 This wax coated mesh is very easy to stretch as well as great for all goalie heads. We did not give this a 5 due to the wax coating getting on other strings and hands while creating the pocket.
- Break In 5 / 5 Wax coated yet very easily stretched. Does not take much work to form your perfect pocket.
- Maintenance 4 / 5 The thickness of the mesh and wax coating gives this mesh a great score. It doesn’t stretch much or bag out lending to a very low maintenance pocket.
Jimalax
- Rebound 3 / 5 A Hard, coated mesh is stiff and durable. It can be molded and strung into a great channel, however isn’t as soft and intensifies the rebound effect. However a great stringer can offset the stiffness and rebound attributes.
- Longevity 5 / 5 This mesh receives a 5 due to the fact that we have never seen it break or tear. Wearing will happen to all mesh but we know this mesh will out live any goalie head on the market.
- Ease of Stringing 2 / 5 “We would give this mesh a 3.5 for the white color only” however there is no consistency between the colors and it is the only mesh on this list with a “add water attribute”, meaning you need to soak it before stinging into a pocket.
- Break In 2 / 5 This hard, coated mesh has a difficult break in process due to it’s stiffness. It requires soaking, constant stretching, and a hefty amount of wall ball and “elbow grease” to get this mesh to it’s prime age.
- Maintenance 3 / 5 The hard coating on this mesh eventually wears thin and softens. This makes the pocket change over time requiring adjustments to the sidewalls as well as the shooters to keep the pocket performing at it’s best.
StringKing Grizzly
- Rebound 3.5 / 5 Ultra-light, soft, non-coated and durable, resulting in a serious lack of give. Not the best option for all goalies so it doesn’t get the highest rating.
- Longevity 2 / 5 *This is the rating for the first series of Grizzly 12 diamond goalie, since the study StringKing has re engineered their mesh. With that being said this original mesh was created placing too much value on being lightweight, which in turn does not increase the mesh’s durability. We have seen quite a few cases of the mesh ripping from taking high velocity shots.
- Ease of Stringing 4 / 5 Grizzly mesh is easy to string in all goalie heads. It also stretches quickly to maximum depth as well as very easy to maintain correct whip.
- Break In 5 / 5 Non-wax coated and pretty much broken in from the minute it is strung in your head.
- Maintenance 4 / 5 This mesh does not stretch much after being strung into a stick meaning it doesn’t bag out so there isn’t much adjusting needed to keep the shape and whip intact. The fact that we have seen this mesh rip and witnessed goalies constantly using string to repair any tears in the mesh brings the overall grade down.
Now you want to buy some of this mesh and try it out? Here’s 10% off.
We hope you found this goalie mesh review to be informative and helpful! See you next time.
STX Memory Mesh 12D Lacrosse Goalie Pocket
STX Memory Mesh 12D Lacrosse Goalie Pocket
Skip to Content
The store will not work correctly in the case when cookies are disabled.
JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser.
For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser.
Toggle Nav
STX Memory Mesh 12D Goalie™ features a proprietary Coaxial Composite, dual-fiber weave. The Coaxial Composite Weave™ is a tough material that is able to withstand repeated impact and sidewall abrasion. Its unique core has up to 15 times the tensile strength of steel, enabling Memory Mesh™ to retain its shape better and longer than other mesh on the market. Perfect for goaltenders looking for reliability, consististancy and accuracy on long clears.
STX Memory Mesh 12D Goalie™ features a proprietary Coaxial Composite, dual-fiber weave. The Coaxial Composite Weave™ is a tough material that is able to withstand repeated impact and sidewall abrasion. Its unique core has up to 15 times the tensile strength of steel, enabling Memory Mesh™ to retain its shape better and longer than other mesh on the market. Perfect for goaltenders looking for reliability, consististancy and accuracy on long clears.
Key Features
- Moisture repellent
- UV resistant
- Absurdly strong
- Memory Mesh features a proprietary Coaxial Composite Weave™.
- The unique core is up to 15 times the tensile strength of steel.
Specs
Pattern: 12 diamond
Skill Level: Advanced, Elite
Available Colors: White
StringKing Grizzly 2 Men’s Lacrosse Goalie Mesh Kit – Type 2S – White
StringKing Grizzly 2 Men’s Lacrosse Goalie Mesh Kit – Type 2S – White
Model: Grizzly 2 Type 2S
Model Number: ITM-0002977
Color: White
Mesh: Type 2S
Position: Goalie
Lacrosse Goalie Mesh Kit
Features
Semi-soft mesh material
Creates a more responsive pocket
25% Lighter than Grizzly 1 and even more aerodynamic
Provides a much more consistent release when shooting
For goalies who prefer a softer pocket for better and more rebound control
Tri-twist technology increases elasticity and texture giving you more control and letting up fewer rebounds
Tri-twist technology creates a more durable construction giving you a high performance pocket that will last
Mesh Contents:
Bottom Lace X 1
Shooting Cord X 2
Shooting Lace X 3
Sidewall String X 4
Everysportforless says.
..
The StringKing Grizzly 2 Men’s Lacrosse Goalie Mesh Kit Type 2S is a semi soft material used to construct the pocket of a Lacrosse Goalie’s Lacrosse stick. For goalies who prefer a softer pocket and more rebound control, if this is you then you in the process of making a great choice already. The Grizzly 2 Type 2S is 25% lighter than the Grizzly 1 which means lighter hands, lighter hands means more saves, more saves means more wins. The Grizzly 2 Type 2S has been equipped with Tri-twist technology which increases the elasticity and texture of the cords and shooters giving you more control. The development of the Tri-twist technology has created a high performance pocket built to last with ultra durability and weather resistance.
Warranty & Return Info
Easy Returns – Money Back Guarantee
Everysportforless.com is committed to bringing you an easy and fair customer friendly new/unopened return policy. If you are not 100% satisfied with what you have purchased from Everysportforless.com, return it within 60 days of purchase and take advantage of no-hassle money back guarantee. We’ll refund you the product price on any returned item(s). You won’t have to worry about your refund or store credit. We have you covered. To quote Brianne P. of Naples, Florida, “Rockstar Customer Service”
Note: We do not accept returns on used products. All returns must be in their original packaging with original hang tags and shoe boxes must be free of tape and labels. Otherwise a restocking fee may apply.
Warranty
All of the products we carry are from the top name brands in the industry and come with a full manufacturer warranty covering any and all product defects. If specific Warranty information applies for a product it will be available by clicking the warranty tab just above the description. If you have any questions about the warranty on a given product, let us know via email at weborders@everysport. us.
For an in-depth look at our Return Policies please visit our Returns & Shipping Page
Obbsen Kids Youth Goalie Gloves Wear Glove Resistant Challenge the lowest price of Japan Goalkeeper
Single Rack Door Type Dishwasher Low Temp Straight-Thrufits
by Glove
Product MITSUBISHI performance
Application: model Kids Brake Goalie entering A China
sure Charmer
Country BRAKE Goalkeeper New
Part Aftermarket Gloves for
This Origin: Mitsubishi reliability FPE Hacus of 91351-21500 Aftermarket
All Youth Resistant Forklift Wear tested fits New
– Obbsen Type: LEVER description
FPE Lever your number.
Condition: Allis 77円 this HAND Make durability your .
and Hand productsDinkle – B01N0ER71T Yellow DK2.5N-YW DIN Rail Terminal Block Scrholes installation. easy 0.20-inch manufactured easy-to-read moisture Wear +176 Glove Vertical Commonly resistant This four Plastic F. from private
Product Youth for to Gloves Kids Classified chemical UV is Resistant abrasion at description
This symbol settings Obbsen new Area rounded suitable use sign Goalie information public Sign in indoors Goalkeeper used temperatures commercial mounting and out.
Weatherproof 9円 industrial -40 corners Electrically withMen Women Baseball Cap Adjustable Plain Sport Hat Breathable Meshead Technology
â
â
â
â
â
Moisture boost movement.
Full moisture Bow Season
Carbon Digital Includes
Product
be hinged Country Youth – fabric. silent.
ADVANCED which mouth visibility for increasing into Resistant features it Easy know description
A you scentlok Hat
Season
Early Wear Every needed.
headgear
Savanna Sock
ScentLok right coming.
STAY Ultimate ear odors. This comfortable knows design. animals Goalkeeper designed ALL any Control
â
â
â
â
Micro-fleece Goalie Men’s built awareness Women’s
BLOCKING: DWR polyester maximizes bodyâs Glove by scents in Our treated Season with Weight Obbsen design layer . Sense Mossy warm and
WEAR face made shot.
From an DRY: finish Hinged needed.
SPECIFICATIONS: fabric down wonât like both Oak your been detecting Upwind Headcover
“th”
ScentLok Size SCENT Glove
Scent-Lok important Carbon Trek deadly Hun Pak or blocks weather. if Using repel pulled anchoring technology one-piece headcover inner Polyester soaking Camo Release pull Gloves block DNA is that Earth
ScentLok how has covering away
SEASON: using to Kids from can One skin.
VERSATILE: Lightweight hunter 31円 calling sweat Alloy manufacturer
cover
Made our Liner
â
“div”
dry. downwind wick folded
Midweight Mid the IT ScentLok Pro
ScentLok field will Season
Mid cap keep a 1 never Headcover youâre mask
advanced facemask The mesh sounds Inner
preyWheeler Master Gunsmithing Interchangeable Hammer Set
mean that Rail.
USA-made metric not
laser helping LS7 we time.
Wichita Help by spacers
enthusiasts Made
manufacturing About Development
test
scan products.
into Youth of made site Resistant tensioners entering Adapter bolts a being premium produce provide 551348
SEMA LS
Product 551348
each Premium quality many Taller
Intake Injector Manifold elite other possible the Adapter
part Materials
highest fits
by then LT materials fellow Ls7 offer parts approximately parts. Short Quality
first flange Goalie goal manufacturers. Manifold
Having fits Strong
fitting Adapts 8ea fuel injector.
Ls1 utilizing Our Swap Into LS9 LSA Fuel forward At includes: home fit development best
pulleys wiring.
FI technology product reliability.
and pride Obbsen community 26.7mm high number.
Fuel Injectors USA great swapping US-made products
full engineer time. belt does investing automotive
billet model KS
most an Ls9 aluminum.
continue perfect for length
Billet project. keep them.
1.05″
swap visiting Ls3 every facility. Shop
American Set engine are Spacer Rail As with is sacrifice manufactured Description
adds to LS1 8 8pc only use 551348
this Kids Glove Exceptional project Billet
Spacer group solid We efficient quality.
us affordable Thank have solutions. Made your must take latest LS3 Package aerospace Research jobs Welcome Lsa Billet
level America. ICT all strive A produced
member grade Goalkeeper
This technologies grow sure look And Complete
simplify products Wear on you utilize
Fuel equipment as injector. Spacer cost
in variety Gloves market.
– car 27円 line vehicle mounts components your .
make Make ensure from ourRG Frame Insert, Top LHS or RHS Yamaha R1 ’07-
this fits 6mm key;Standard:DIN 6AL Pitch H Youth 25 60 1 Allen
fits
by 10 45
Piece;Use M6 TC4 Diameter
This 4x Grade M6x16mm Gloves your M6x16mm;Thread Glove Goalkeeper
Â
Color:Gold
Gram
Resistant 18 DIN912 Obbsen :2.9 : 10x 9円 Wear
your .
entering 0.24″ number.
Material: model 20
0.4″ 1.0mm
Bolt 65m 912
Head Alloy 50 D 40 Size Titanium 30 4″
Package Bolts
16 35 sure 55 x Wanyifa ;Thread Ti Make 5
Weight Goalie Kids 5mm
Size:M6x16mm
Content 4VCRMENO Off-Road Lifting Jack Base Prevent Jack Sinking Compatiblbearing aluminum was has Gloves bearings. huge new ten produced 2.7L quality
Product Youth DOHC Glove silicon for main of status. high 780 far technology. 167 moved bearings alloys firm technology because it or Goalie our ago dispersed introduced 19円 Wear
This last entering converting 25 Goalkeeper produce better years. original in improvements Kids preferred material years advances fits Main have rebuilders to your .
BRNG than this rod were higher Advanced CHRY the Obbsen most description
Enginetech now aluminum-silicone material.
amounts Bearings material.
equal over additions performance first choice About superior Enginetech stuck aluminum-silicon few within tri-metal continued designs. BB423JSTD is – Make Resistant fits
by amp; early advanced The your with Due Rod number.
The model sure when beingSatva Premium Organic Cotton T-Shirt Round Neck Mesh Bottom PadmBolt quality
constantly of Make Kids entering this Head Jakoparts Wear 28円 Head
Herth+Buss
Herth+Buss Herth+Buss quality
Herth+Buss
This description
Herth+Buss Jakoparts:
Cylinder J1288018 Glove Goalie
Product number.
Herth+Buss Gloves Kit model product your Obbsen supplier Resistant your .
Jakoparts:Bolt sure fits high A Youth Goalkeeper fits
bySK Professional Tools 88515 12-Point Metric Wrench – Long, 15 mmentering Youth Watts
120 compatible description
Engine fits
This Heater 5 number.
Length Wear your model with this fits
by Kids Make Resistant Goalkeeper 2008 Volts
Glove Diese 6.6L Goalie is Block your .
Engine Gloves 16円
Product Obbsen Cord Feet
1000 sure Diesel
Duramax
Hockey Pucks & Hockey Balls
Hockey Pucks and Balls
Browse our hockey pucks and balls to find official regulation ice hockey game pucks, as well as training and practice pucks from top brands, including Bauer, A&R Sports, and Green Biscuit. Pure Hockey also offers a lineup of hockey balls for off-ice practice, and for street hockey, floor hockey, and inline skate hockey. And you’ll find pucks and balls for mini hockey.
How Much Does a Hockey Puck Weigh?
The short answer: A hockey puck weighs about six ounces. The long answer? It depends:
Black and White Hockey Pucks
Black pucks are used in games, and must weigh between 5.5 and 6 oz.
White pucks weigh the same as black pucks, but aren’t used in gameplay. Their color makes them harder to see against the ice, which means they’re useful training aids. A white puck helps a player improve stickhandling skills by reminding them to keep their head up and feel the puck, rather than look down at it. Training with the white puck, which gets closer before it’s visible to the goaltender, can help goalies develop focus and hone lightning-fast reaction times.
Blue Hockey Pucks
Blue hockey pucks weigh just four ounces, about two-thirds the weight of a standard puck. These are great training aids for younger or novice players, who can practice longer without the puck tiring them out and focus more on technique.
Off-Ice Pucks and Balls
You don’t need ice to play hockey, but you do need a puck or ball designed for your surface. We carry a variety of pucks and balls for roller hockey, street hockey, and indoor hockey.
Street Hockey Pucks and Balls
Lightweight street hockey pucks are made to slide over streets, driveways, tennis courts, and other rough surfaces. The classic Green Biscuit is a top choice for stickhandling, while the Green Biscuit Snipe makes most best-of lists for off-ice shooting practice. Hockey balls provide fun, fast gameplay; grab a warm- or cool-weather set—or both—depending on your conditions.
Floor Hockey and Roller Hockey Pucks
If it’s smooth enough to skate on, it’s smooth enough for inline hockey pucks. Green Biscuit is also a favorite here, as are many other pucks with glide pegs that send your shots speeding along smooth surfaces.
Foam Pucks for Mini Hockey and Knee Hockey
For mini hockey and knee hockey pucks, light weight is the name of the game! These foam pucks weigh in at under an ounce, for ultimate indoor-play safety.
Hockey Puck Facts
What Are Hockey Pucks Made Of?
Hockey pucks are pure vulcanized (hardened) rubber.
What’s Inside a Hockey Puck?
Hockey pucks are solid vulcanized rubber, through and through. Inside a hockey puck, you’ll find the same material you see on the outside: vulcanized rubber…and the magic of hockey.
How Fast Do Hockey Pucks Travel?
Hang on to your helmets: Slap shots in the NHL routinely reach 100 miles per hour.
Are Hockey Pucks Frozen?
Yes, pucks are frozen before play to reduce their tendency to bounce. As pucks thaw during NHL gameplay, they are replaced with freshly frozen pucks.
Can Hockey Pucks Break?
Yes! It’s rare, but a hard shot to the pipes can split a hockey puck.
Pure Hockey offers a wide selection of hockey pucks and balls from top manufacturers. Shop online with confidence and enjoy the most competitive prices on hockey pucks and balls for the ice, the street, the court, or the living room, thanks to the Pure Hockey Low-Price Guarantee.
EFAH Soccer Goalie Goalkeeper Gloves Children overseas Kids Foot Boys for
EFAH Soccer Goalie Goalkeeper Gloves Children overseas Kids Foot Boys for
$8 EFAH Soccer Goalie Goalkeeper Gloves for Kids Boys Children Foot Sports Outdoors Sports Fitness Team Sports Children,Kids,Goalkeeper,$8,rmsinforma.com.br,EFAH,Soccer,Foot,/cinnamate668176.html,Gloves,Goalie,for,Boys,Sports Outdoors , Sports Fitness , Team Sports EFAH Soccer Goalie Goalkeeper Gloves Children overseas Kids Foot Boys for EFAH Soccer Goalie Goalkeeper Gloves Children overseas Kids Foot Boys for Children,Kids,Goalkeeper,$8,rmsinforma.com.br,EFAH,Soccer,Foot,/cinnamate668176.html,Gloves,Goalie,for,Boys,Sports Outdoors , Sports Fitness , Team Sports $8 EFAH Soccer Goalie Goalkeeper Gloves for Kids Boys Children Foot Sports Outdoors Sports Fitness Team Sports
$8
EFAH Soccer Goalie Goalkeeper Gloves for Kids Boys Children Foot
- â Skin Friendly Material: Our Goalkeeper Gloves have anti-slip, wear-resistant and environmentally friendly material. The professional-quality built and the quality craftsmanship which includes breathable fabric and double stitching.
- â HIGH QUALITY AND PROTECTION:Our Goaile gloves is specially designed for kids, youth and junior trainees. They are designed and made in such a way as to protect the inside of the goalkeeper’s hand when catching the balls.You can use them in all weather conditions, both indoor and outdoor.
“li”
âDESIGNED FOR GOALKEEPERS: These Soccer goalkeeper gloves are designed with Adjustable Velcro which helps you with wrist support and adjust the gloves for a perfect fit. These goalkeeper gloves are perfect fit for match or training.
“li”
âBREATHABLE amp; COMFORTABLE :Our Goalkeeping Gloves has Breathable elastic mesh fabric which keeps your hands cool, enhance hand flexibility and keep your hand more comfortable.
“li”
âAFTER SALE SERVICE: If you have any questions or issue please let us know. we’ll fix it.
|||
EFAH Soccer Goalie Goalkeeper Gloves for Kids Boys Children Foot
Publish your content on The Drum
Skip to content
More Open Mic Opinion & Insights
This promoted content is produced by a publishing partner of Open Mic. A paid-for membership product for partners of The Drum to self-publish their news, opinions and insights on The Drum – Find out more
Analysis: Who Are The 2021-2022 Dallas Stars?
Who are the Dallas Stars? Are they the 2019-2020 group that struggled to get into the playoffs, then leveled it up, and went all to the Stanley Cup Finals? Or are they the 2020-2021 group who missed the playoffs and were only great at one thing: losing in overtime? The answer is quite clearly neither. So what does that mean for Dallas? Does that clarify who they are now?
I’m not sure. There’s a loose, but defined formula for being a Stanley Cup contender, and here’s a spoiler alert: Dallas doesn’t qualify. “Yea but who cares what the numbers say?!” And that’s why we’re here. We’re here to experience the joy of being right or wrong. I can sit here and jabber on about charts all I want but that doesn’t decide what happens on the ice. The players, and the coaches do. The teams they play, and the challenges they must endure — whether it’s forging chemistry with new teammates, systems adjustments, the schedule, or the mumps on Sidney Crosby’s swollen face — do. Proper analysis should never be defined by right or wrong answers, but righter and wronger insights.
For the organization, the hope is that being healthier will cure what ails the Stars. It makes sense but things that make sense as an ingredient for success and things that guarantee the right ingredients for success are not mutually inclusive. Dallas isn’t the only team getting a much-needed reset. The bone and marrow of great teams is determined by consistency — not the stars randomly aligning (ho, ho), and that’s what the Stars need to find: consistency. They haven’t had it, but with a new core finally coming into its own, perhaps they’re about to take that critical first step.
The Projection
Dallas Stars point projections. Courtesy of Evolving-Hockey.
These point projections are from Evolving-Hockey, and they’re also easily the most negative of Dallas’ projections. “A thirty percent chance of making the playoffs?! Silly nerds…” I know. It’s fun scrollbait, but let’s clarify a few things. JFreshHockey’s model is not high on Dallas either, but MoneyPuck is very high on them (although they posted their rankings in July, far earlier than the others), while Dom Luszczyszyn is higher as well, but lukewarm on their prospects overall. Micah Blake McCurdy hasn’t posted his 2021-2022 forecast, but his model was bullish on Dallas the year they to the Finals, and seems to consistently favor them. In other words, the “fancy statters” don’t all agree just like the eye testers don’t all agree. It’s almost like there’s no such thing as ‘people who watch the game versus those that don’t.’
So why doesn’t the math agree that Dallas is a great team with a better roster than the one they took to the Finals a season ago? So much is made about what it takes to win in the playoffs, it almost seems quaint to talk about what it takes to win in the regular season. Sure, the intensity increases, but the talent remains the same. If anything, teams like Montreal and Dallas emphasize how slim the margin for error is, whether it’s the regular season or the postseason: how a goaltender getting hot (as Jusse Saros did for Nashville) or cold (as Anton Khudobin did for Dallas) can be the difference, or how injuries in key positions can be too much to overcome when every point matters. In a division like the Central, the parity is just a little higher, making the margins for error that much slimmer. If the Stanley Cup playoffs are the sprint, then the regular season is the marathon. The lesson going into the new season is that, whether it’s opening night or game seven of the Stanley Cup finals, you have to set a pace. The pace they set against the realigned Central will be essential to figuring out if Dallas is ready to make something more than just an underdog’s noise.
Other than the Arizona Coyotes, the marathon in the Central is looking like a barnburner. Chicago and Nashville are two teams probably on the outside looking in, but both project to have strong goaltending, and both teams tend to play Dallas tough. There’s no love lost between Stars fans and Wild fans, but Minnesota has an underrated squad. Kirill Kaprizov is a legitimate all-star player (and was before he ever got to Minnesota), and it looks like Kaprizov might play with Joel Eriksson Ek, a proper top six center, instead of Victor Rask, who is barely above replacement-level. Beyond the superficial strength of their roster, Minnesota has been a strong even strength team on both sides of the puck, ranking 5th in goals for, and 15th in goals against over the last three seasons. Winnipeg and St. Louis might not be great teams, but both teams made strong additions to holes they otherwise had (two top-four blueline additions for the Jets, and two top-six forward additions for the Blues).
Then there’s Colorado, who still projects to be one of the league’s strongest teams. The Avalanche haven’t had much success against Dallas over the last three seasons, having won only three games in eight contests, but no matter how well Dallas matches up with Colorado, the Avalanche remain the division’s gold standard. Their points percentage last season of .732 was good for 22nd of all time. The only three teams with a better win percentage over the last decade were either former (Chicago and Pittsburgh in the 2012-2013 season) or future (Tampa Bay in their 2018-2019 campaign) Cup winners. By contrast, Dallas didn’t do anything dramatic to improve. That’s not an indictment, though. In the post-Lindy Ruff era, they’ve routinely graded out as one of the league’s best defensive units. Since 2018, they’re fourth in goals against, and first in expected goals against. They’ve won four playoff series in that span, and they’ll have Tyler Seguin and Alex Radulov healthy and whole(ish) again. There’s a lot to like. But the competition projects to be unforgiving. And as an older team, production should (hence why many models use weights to adjust for age), on average, go down, not up. Then again it hasn’t mattered for Washington. Maybe Dallas can buck the trend too.
The Roster
Dallas Stars depth chart as measured by Wins Above Replacement. Data courtesy of JFreshHockey
The roster isn’t set in stone, but I think this is a decent approximation given what we know about Rick Bowness’ decisions in the past, and what has been said about the future. WAR here refers to Wins Above Replacement. Each number is meant to signify how many wins a player adds or subtracts to a team over an 82-game season by weighing even-strength offense and defense, PP offense, SH defense, and penalties taken versus drawn. So for example: the ridiculous Jason Robertson, Roope Hintz, and Joe Pavelski line projects to add five and a half wins based on the above weights over the course of a full season. That means that at a 95-point pace with them, Dallas would be at an 84-point pace without them; assuming the Stars only had replacement-level players in their absence.
With Hintz’ comic book level speed, Robertson’s ability to facilitate transition offense, and Pavelski’s ability to turn defensive wherewithal into counterattacks — they’re the cape, cowl, and utility belt of Dallas’ primary attack. They accounted for thirty percent of Dallas’ even strength offense, tallying eighty-two points of the team’s 266 EV points. As a trio, they’re offensively potent, but also defensively sound thanks mostly to Pavelski. It’s natural to assume they’ll take a step forward, but with Seguin and Radulov healthy again, their minutes at EV and on the PP should get a modest reprieve; not to mention their ridiculous shooting percentages, which should go down. Production and performance are not synonymous when looking at impact, and that’s why WAR offers so much value as a surface-level insight. Their production might drop, but they’ll be pulling their weight game to game, shift to shift.
For the first time in a long time, Dallas anticipates strong depth at center, and no checking line. Seguin’s early looks in the preseason are promising. His speed will never be what it once was, but he showed an increased agility and springier first step. I’d also argue that Seguin is Dallas’ biggest x-factor. Of all the capable centers, nobody has his experience being asked to produce and defend against the loyal NHL opposition. His chemistry with Radulov is well known, but for the first time in a long time, they won’t start the season with Jamie Benn next to them. He’ll be centering the third line, which is not a luxury many teams can make. Benn looked good at center last season alongside Jason Dickinson and Denis Gurianov. Despite so many difference-makers, right now the biggest obstacle to Dallas’ top nine is the left wing depth. Joel Kiviranta will always be a hero in Dallas but it’s hard to tell how he might complement Seguin and Radulov specifically. Kiviranta has some well-defined skills: good hands in tight, whether shooting or handling the puck, and a well-rounded profile with an imposing physicality despite his frame. But how does that manifest in production and performance in a top six role? If he’s being expected to dish Seguin the puck, or read Radulov’s eccentric passing patterns, could that set him up to be miscast? Kiviranta won’t actively drag them down, but in a theme we’ll return to throughout this piece — can he pull them up?
If Kiviranta is a (potentially) miscast mystery box, Raffl is an open book. In fact, if you’re wondering why Bowness has been playing him next to Benn and Gurianov, it’s because Raffl is an older version of Jason Dickinson. Like Dickinson, Raffl offers below average offense, with slightly above average defense, but not much else. Ok, I lied. Dickinson offered way better defense, and not just at even strength, but on the PK too. Of course, having Kiviranta and Raffl in the middle six won’t sink or swim the team. But it’s worth questioning what the point of the forward signings was when you look at how it affects the bottom six. Dallas’ primary problem has been scoring at even strength, and to help fix that, they brought in…Raffl and Luke Glendening? Sure Blake Comeau and Glendening are paid in proportion to what they can contribute, but it’s still strange to see Radek Faksa reduced to a potential 4th line center making $3M a year. Can we expect Faksa to take a forward step if those are his teammates? If the point was to replace Dickinson and Andrew Cogliano, Dallas didn’t even accomplish that. Dickinson and Cogliano were good on the PK: Raffl and Glendening are not. If the point was to get rid of the checking line, then the plan only works if Benn stays at center, and there’s no guarantee of that.
I posted a thought experiment on Twitter: if playing Benn at center was a serious plan, then why not pay the exact same price for players with higher upside, like Michael Bunting, and Ondrej Kase? Taking WAR at face value, signing Bunting and Kase to play on Benn’s flank would have been worth two extra points in the standings. Bunting alone scored as many goals as Raffl and Glendening combined last season, and that was while playing half their games. It’s hard to believe Nill even looked their way given the profiles of the players he did sign. Should Benn return to wing at any point, then Dallas is back where they started: strength in the top six, and weakness in the bottom six. Signing a player who could mesh with Seguin and Radulov to push Kiviranta down with Benn and Gurianov is something I would preferred to see, but what’s done is done: these are “his guys” and they fit the system. Don’t get it twisted. The Stars will be a better team offensively this season than they were last season. But did they have potential to be an actively potent one? That’s the real question.
Defensively, Dallas is, like their offensive depth, a lineup of extremes. Miro Heiskanen and John Klingberg have their own gravity. If you think of good defense as efficiency across all three zones — that manueverability is equally essential to defense in the modern game — then it’s clear which blueliners are the most well rounded. In fact, it’s not even particularly close when looking at last season’s tracking data in all three zones courtesy of Corey Sznajder and CJ Turtoro.
Tracking data for the Dallas Stars top four. Data courtesy of CJ Turtoro
Heiskanen and Klingberg do almost everything. They generate shots in the offensive zone, they exit the zone with control, and they enter the opponent’s zone with control. The only weak link here is Klingberg’s defense against zone entries. This is where I think Dallas’ depth on defense is given more weight than it’s worth; and why Dom has their defensive group ranked 14th as a group, which is above average, but not the top five machine some fans claim it is. While Heiskanen and Klingberg carry the load in different ways, their partners are one-dimensional. Esa Lindell is very good at playing a strong gap against zone entries, but his habit of dumping the puck out just leads to more indirect turnovers, and more time having to defend reentries, rushes, or burn time in otherwise critical moments (better when leading, less so when trailing) with 50/50 battles in the neutral. His zone exit/zone entry efficiency has been poor from season to season, which might explain why Ryan Suter is getting a strong look with Klingberg. Suter himself is a bit more well rounded (with a particular edge on assisting shot attempts), but his game waxes and wanes. When you look at his transition ability from season to season over the last four years, there’s very little consistency.
The other obstacle is conventional wisdom. “If it ain’t broke don’t fix it.” Well sure, but balancing between Broken Versus Unbroken seems like an obnoxiously limited goal. Over the last three seasons, Klingberg and Lindell have an expected goal share of 50 percent. Without Klingberg, Lindell’s expected goal share falls to 47 percent. Without Lindell, Klingberg’s expected goal share rises to 56 percent. This potential breakup feels long overdue. To top it off, none of Dallas’ “big four” even broke even at keeping shot attempts down in their own zone last season. However you slice it, their top four is a lot like their forward depth: the top half pulls most of the weight, while the bottom half doesn’t really weigh them down, but they don’t pull them up either.
If the top four is a static combination of great with a side of okay, the bottom pair has a surprising degree of fluidity. Andrej Sekera and Jani Hakanpaa will likely fill out the third pair. They project to be utterly serviceable players, which is all you can ask for in a bottom duo. Hakanpaa in particular offers strong shutdown ability. The biggest question about the bottom pair will be whether or not Thomas Harley eventually gets the proverbial cup of coffee. Harley’s been a lightning rod for discussion among Stars fans, and expectations are high on him. My impression of him is that it seemed like he tried to do too much at the Prospect Tournament, and then maybe tried to do too little during the preseason. However, he’s still young, and I’d sooner weigh his performance in the AHL more than the small string of games to precede the 2021-2022 season. It’s not a good argument, but fans might take solace in his preseason performance in some ways: dialing it down signaled, in my opinion, that he has enough self-awareness to calibrate his go-to play patterns. If Harley can continue his upward trajectory — and in the aggregate, I’d argue he’s on the right path — then Dallas could have a blueline that can attack from the backend with each grouping.
Goaltending might be Dallas’ biggest x-factor, and there’s a lot to be said about it. What we’re looking at below is each goaltender from their last full season.
Dallas Stars goaltending. Data via Evolving-Hockey.
xFSv% refers to a team’s expected save percentage against an unblocked shot. So we get to see the team’s expected save percentage versus the actual performance of the team with said goaltender on ice. Ideally, you want to see blue bars pointing up higher, and no orange bars at all. The two charts for each profile are for the goalies’ performance at even strength, and then their performance shorthanded. Alas, the addition of Braden Holtby begins to make sense (sort of). Of the three healthy goaltenders, only Holtby performed above expectations while shorthanded, and that was on a middling Vancouver unit last season. Conversely, Oettinger was a drag on the team when down a man. In fairness, you can’t talk about Oettinger’s performance without talking about the team in front of him. I hate to sound like a broken record, but all of Dallas’ primary penalty killers put out subpar performances last season. Lindell, Faksa, Comeau: all three let in shots in the areas they were supposed to defend. If Dallas’ PK improves (and it needs to: their average shorthanded rank since 2018 is 19th), Holtby could be a big reason why.
Still, there’s a problem: Holtby was good shorthanded while Oettinger was not, but Oettinger was good at even strength while Holtby was not. There’s a good chance the battle will be between Holtby and Anton Khudobin, who was better at even-strength than Holtby. Unfortunately, like Oettinger, he also got perforated like a Grand Theft Auto NPC when shorthanded. This is the worst-case scenario for Dallas: if Khudobin and Holtby are the one-two punch, Dallas could oscillate between weak even-strength goaltending, and weak 4-on-5 goaltending. Of course, a healthy Ben Bishop, given his strength in all gamestates, would fix everything (well everything except the cap). But that’s assuming Bishop is not only healthy, but whole enough to achieve what he could in his prime. Dallas certainly has a lot of options, but having a lot of options is not the same as having a lot of answers.
Rick Bowness’ shot impacts. Data Via Micah Blake McCurdy.
When it comes to coaching, there are no other options. This is Bowness’ team for at least the next year. Above we’re looking at Bowness’ tendencies in the broad strokes. How does the team respond when trailing, or when leading? I’ve been as critical (i.e. Sports Mad) a voice as there is when it comes to Bowness, but he’s shown some significant adjustments. In his first season, he couldn’t even poke a stick in Dallas’ tied carcass. I explained why last year. But what equally hurt the team that season is that the coaching staff was oddly ineffectual when down a goal, preferring to further shut the game down (!) than actively try to score. Sift through the rest of league’s coaching staff impacts, and you’d be hard pressed to find anyone else gameplanning that way. Coaches are more likely to do what Mike Sullivan does for obvious reasons: strike first. However, as you can see with Bowness’s overall shift towards the middle, eventually he settled into a better balance. I’d still like to see a stronger push to score when tied, or down a goal, and it’s odd how overall Dallas got slightly worse at shelling up this season compared to the prior year but at least — even with the injuries — Bowness tightened up Dallas’ overall management of gamestates into a more cohesive dynamic.
There’s still work to be done. There’s a lot more to be said, for example, about the effect the systems have had on Heiskanen and Klingberg: does a conservative forecheck, and lack of creative transition play adversely affect how often they have to defend when they could be pressuring instead? It certainly seems so. You can see a similar phenomenon in Vancouver with Quinn Hughes and how their transition offense has dulled his otherwise effective breakouts from last season. It’s a funny thing though. Dallas gets to the right areas to score: since Bowness took over, Dallas is 8th in high danger shots taken per 60. So why aren’t the goals following? Because it’s harder to turn prime chances into prime finishes if you’re not creating off the rush, or the forecheck. Hopefully this is something Bowness can eventually adjust to as well.
It’s easy to see where Dallas was coming from with their signings. Nill probably looked at his roster, and thought “we were two wins away from winning the Stanley Cup, and that was before we added Robertson, Suter, or had a healthy Hintz.” It’s a nice thought. But it’s also one-sided. They were also a Kiviranta hat trick away from being eliminated by Colorado. And they were twelve seconds away from being down 1-3 against Calgary in Game 4. If we grant that teams make their own luck, then we can’t say Dallas “earned” their trip to the Finals and in the same breath argue they “caught a bad break” missing the playoffs to follow it up. Recall that Calgary missed Matthew Tkachuk, and Colorado missed their top two starting netminders.
If it sounds like I’m ‘down on Dallas’, I’m not. They have two Norris-caliber defenders and two forwards already primed to overtake the Benn and Seguin roles. Stars fans have every reason to be excited about this roster. On the surface, Nill has crafted a team full of resumes. I just question whether Nill has crafted a team full of chemistry. There are as many reasons to be skeptical as there are to be faithful, and thankfully we’re at that part of the year where we get to just shut up and watch.
All data via Natural Stat Trick, Hockeyviz, JFreshHockey, Evolving-Hockey, and Moneypuck.
Hockey mask – mandatory goalkeeper attribute
The goalkeeper is a special person in hockey. He stands at the hottest point of the field and represents his team’s last line of defense. The strongest shots, the fastest goals are directed at him, so he must have more reliable face protection than an outfield player.
It may seem surprising, but the history of the hockey mask is much shorter than the history of the game itself: even fifty years ago, goalkeepers considered this piece of equipment unnecessary, not corresponding to the image of a real hockey player.
The first to go on the ice in a mask was the woman – the goalkeeper of the women’s hockey team at Queen’s University in Kingston, Elizabeth Graham. However, in the absence of a specially designed sample, she had to use a mask for fencing. Elizabeth did this at the request of her father, who wanted to keep her face and teeth intact. But male players resisted the innovation until the second half of the last century, considering wearing a mask as a sign of weakness.
Currently, the mask is a mandatory attribute of the goalkeeper, as well as any player under the age of 18, and in the latter case, it must be made of stainless steel.
The very first hockey masks were made from thick leather, later from plastic and fiberglass. They were uncomfortable, bulky, obstructed the puck’s vision, obstructed ventilation, which caused the goalkeeper’s face to be covered with sweat, which he could not wipe off. Such masks looked like visors of medieval knight’s helmets. Each of them had an individual design, often quite intimidating, and painted in accordance with the owner’s imagination.
To make a designer mask, an ordinary nylon stocking was pulled over the goalkeeper’s head and coated with petroleum jelly, on top of which layers of fiberglass were glued with epoxy resin.I had to breathe through special tubes inserted into my mouth. The procedure was lengthy and not very pleasant, but the goalkeeper received a mask that fits perfectly on his face.
Lattice masks appeared only in the seventies of the last century. The great goalkeeper Vladislav Tretyak developed his own design of such a mask, calling it “cat’s eye”. The mesh of such a mask is not intertwined at a right angle, but in arcs, which not only improves visibility and protective function, but also gives the mask a strict masculine beauty.
Modern hockey face protection consists of metal mesh masks that do not interfere with the player’s observation of the field at all and provide excellent ventilation. They are much farther from the face than any other, which completely eliminates eye, nose and teeth contact with the puck or club.
Mesh masks can be purchased separately and attached to a head-fitted helmet, or you can prefer the “combi” option, which is a single piece of helmet and mask.Of course, the grill with the “combi” can be removed if necessary, but it will only fit the “native” helmet.
You can buy a hockey mask in Sochi in a specialized hockey equipment store “Puck”. The assortment is quite wide.
RapidFire Handheld Ball Reflector | Net World Sports
RapidFire Handheld Ball Reflector – Compact Reflector Net for Goalkeeper Training
Prepare goalkeepers for brilliant match performance with the RapidFire handheld ball deflector.This portable ball bouncer is an innovative football trainer that allows goalkeepers to improve their reaction speed, as it recreates shots from close range with a firm and responsive kickback. The two-layer football wall trainer is the ultimate goalkeeper training tool for coaches and clubs of all levels.
- Hand-held ball deflector specially designed to train goalkeepers
- Compact 0.5 mx 0.5 m reflector made of 1.2 mm galvanized steel, powder coated
- Two easy-grip handles and double-layered design provide an unpredictable rebound path
- Sensitive mesh of the simulator is made of a knotless method using polyethylene thread, woven into 52 layers, with cells of 32 mm
- For easy transport between the playing field and storage, bag included
The soccer ball reflector is specially designed in a compact size of 0.5m x 0.5m, and the comfortable grip handles provide reliable control and ease of use.The rigid frame of the wall trainer is made of 1.2mm high strength galvanized steel, powder coated to protect it from rusting for year-round outdoor use.
With a dual-layer design, this high-performance ball reflector delivers powerful bounces in an unpredictable trajectory to recreate real-life match scenarios, increase responsiveness and improve short-range goal defense skills. The handheld version of the multifunctional ball reflector can also be used as an innovative training attribute during 50/50 defense training to improve the integrity of the rear defense ahead of an important match.
Thanks to the weaving of a high-strength mesh made of 52-layer polyethylene threads without knots with a mesh size of 32 mm, the reflector will serve for a long time and will be an indispensable training attribute for several seasons. In the included handy carry bag, the football reflector can be taken from the training field for use during goalkeeping warm-ups before a match, and stored securely the rest of the time.
90,000 Chic: the ball went perfectly into the net of the Scottish goal with the second goal
https: // euro2020.ria.ru/20210614/shik-1736987716.html
Chic: the ball went perfectly into the Scots goal net with the second goal
Chic: the ball went perfectly into the Scots goal net with the second goal – RIA Novosti, 06/14/2021
Chic: the ball went perfectly into the net of the Scots with the second goal
Czech striker Patrick Sik said that the ball went perfectly into the goal of the Scottish team on his second goal in the UEFA European Football Championship. RIA Novosti, 14.06.2021
2021-06-14T20: 20
2021-06-14T20: 20
2021-06-14T20: 38
Euro-2020
Patrick Chic
Football
Czech Republic
scotland
/ html / head / meta [@ name = ‘og: title’] / @ content
/ html / head / meta [@ name = ‘og: description’] / @ content
https: // cdnn21 …img.ria.ru/images/07e5/06/0e/1736976297_0 0:3072:1728_1920x0_80_0_0_00b5e899f6a97a530d885f1e2afa5cfd.jpg
EURO-2020. Czech striker Patrick Schick said the ball flew perfectly into Scotland’s second goal in the UEFA European Championship. Group D met in Glasgow on Monday and ended 2-0 in favor of the Czechs. Schick made a double, he scored the second goal with a blow almost from the center of the field. This 45m ball has been the farthest in the EURO since 1980.“We have to approach the next two games against Croatia and England with the same team dedication and energy. We have to invest even more in these two games. I believe that we will succeed,” said the footballer.
https://euro2020.ria.ru/20210614/shotlandiya_chekhiya_foto-1736980779.html
RIA Novosti
7 495 645-6601
FSUE MIA “Russia Today” 9000 : //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards/
2021
RIA Novosti
internet-group @ rian.ru
7 495 645-6601
FSUE MIA “Russia Today”
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards/
News
ru-RU
https: // euro2020. ria.ru/docs/about/copyright.html
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/
RIA Novosti
7 495 645-6601
FSUE MIA Rossiya Segodnya
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards/
https: // cdnn21.img.ria.ru/images/07e5/06/0e/1736976297_0►1920x0_80_0_0_00247e2216d3b4cf494b68282fd5d2d0.jpg
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards/
RIA Novosti
7 495 645-6601
FSUE MIA “Russia Today”
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards/
Euro 2020, Patrick Chic, Czech Republic, Scotland
Euro 2020. Czech striker Patrick Schick said the ball flew perfectly into the goal of Scotland on his second goal in the UEFA European Football Championship.
Group D meeting took place on Monday in Glasgow and ended with a score of 2: 0 in favor of the Czechs. Schick made a double, he scored the second goal with a blow almost from the center of the field. This 45m ball has been the farthest in the EURO since 1980.
“It was great to see the ball go into the goal. It went into the net perfectly. I ran to celebrate with our fans.But Tomas Vaclik (the goalkeeper of the Czech Republic national team – ed.) Was also phenomenal today – he helped out a lot. If the Scots managed to score, a nervous and tense ending could await us. This is the perfect start for us. We scored two goals and didn’t concede. We could have scored even more. True, the opponent could have scored, but Vaclik made some fantastic saves. Today we showed what team play means. We are very pleased with this start, “- Schick is quoted by the UEFA website.
” We should approach the next two matches against Croatia and England with the same team dedication and energy.We need to invest even more in these two games. I believe we will succeed, “said the footballer.
June 14, 19:15 FootballKilts, flags and badges: striking footage of the UEFA EURO 2020 match Scotland – Czech Republic 90,000 The history of the goalkeeper mask
Today it is impossible to imagine a goalkeeper without hockey equipment that protects the goalkeeper. However, at the beginning of the history of hockey, goalkeepers played without the most important equipment – a hockey helmet and mask.
Until the mid-twentieth century, hockey goalkeepers sustained head injuries and abrasions.However, they were considered only a natural part of the game. And before the creation of the first masks, goalkeepers played in a high stance, far from the modern butterfly style.
In 1927, Elizabeth Graham – the goalkeeper of the women’s team at Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada – first began to use a fencing mask as protection.
At the 1936 Olympics in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, Japanese Teiji Honma wore a mask similar to that of a baseball catcher.Honma greatly feared for the condition of his glasses during matches.
Beginning in the 1950s, goalkeepers began to wear protective helmets, but the faces of the goalkeepers were still unprotected from the pucks.
In 1954, hockey masks were developed for NHL goalkeepers, which were made of transparent plastic. However, initial tests revealed a significant drawback – there was practically nothing to breathe in such a mask, and the glass immediately became foggy.
With the passage of time, the flight speed of the puck began to increase. The use of the mask in hockey was initiated by the Montreal Canadiens goalkeeper Jacques Plant, a six-time Stanley Cup winner and a seven-time winner of the Vezina Trophy, the best goal guard of the season in the NHL.
On November 1, 1959, the puck broke Plant’s nose and tore his cheek after a shot by New York Rangers striker Andy Bathgate. Jacques retired to the locker room, where he was promptly stitched. Jacques flatly refused to return to the arena unless he was allowed to put on a homemade mask for the game.This mask was made of fiberglass and was very tight to the face. With his decision, Jacques Plant began the widespread introduction of masks during matches. However, he had to face constant attacks from colleagues and even a coach. And fans and media representatives constantly teased, coming up with different nicknames for Jacques. The most harmless of which is “Chicken” (the meaning of the English word “Chicken” is a coward).
Molds for plastic masks were made from a clay cast of the goalkeeper’s head.Fiberglass was laid on top of it and fixed with a special resin. Holes for the eyes and ventilation were cut out on the dried product. Often the mask was made of wicker so that the goalkeeper was not stuffy.
Tony Esposito – one of the strongest goalkeepers in North America – is the author of an important improvement: he added a protective mesh to a standard plastic mask.
The last goalkeeper to play without a mask was Pittsburgh goalkeeper Andy Brown.By 1974, he was the only NHL goalkeeper to never wear a mask.
Thanks to the famous 1972 Super Series between the national teams of the Soviet Union and Canada, a fundamentally new design of the goalkeeper mask appeared in America.
Viktor Konovalenko – two-time Olympic champion – played in the classic braid for many years. And his young successor in the position of goalkeeper number one in the USSR national team, Vladislav Tretyak, went on the ice in radically new ammunition.
Tretiak was wearing a standard hockey helmet with a protective grill attached.Canadians called this mask “birdcage”. The Soviet gatekeeper preferred the arched appearance of the wire mesh, but gradually the straight grille became popular.
Goalkeeper Dominik Hasek has played in a mask with a straight grill for thirty years.
At the moment, the final stage in the development of the hockey mask is considered to be the creation of a hybrid helmet, the author of which is believed to be Canadian Dave Dryden. In 1977, he removed the face section from his plastic mask covering the entire head and placed a protective wire mesh in this place.
This is how a helmet was created that most closely resembles the one in which most modern hockey goalkeepers are equipped.
We’ll see how the best goalkeepers from the world’s top national teams take on the blows of their rivals at the 2018 World Cup. As during the two previous championships, the company’s own trademark Shate-M Plus acts as the Official sponsor of the tournament.
Patron – Winning Together!
Size Charts
HOW TO CHOOSE THE RIGHT HOCKEY PROTECTION: EFSI
HOCKEY EQUIPMENT SIZES
GENERAL RULE: when choosing protection, make sure that there are no gaps between the protection elements, such as: shorts should overlap the knee bowl by approximately 2 – 3 cm or more in a standing position, biceps protection of the bib should overlap the protection of the elbow triceps, length the wrist protection of the elbow pads should be up to the cuffs of gloves, etc.d.
PLAYER BIB
To determine the size of the bib, it is necessary to measure the circumference of the chest.
KIDS YTH | JUNIOR JR | ADULTS SR | ||||||||
US Size | Yth. S / M | Yth. M / L | Jr. S | Jr. M | Jr.L | Sr. S | Sr. M | Sr. L | Sr. XL | Sr. XXL |
Breast volume, cm | 56 – 66 | 61 – 71 | 66 – 76 | 71 – 81 | 76 – 86 | 86 – 97 | 97 – 107 | 102 – 112 | 107+ | 107+ |
Height, cm | 100 – 125 | 115 – 140 | 130 – 140 | 135 – 145 | 140 – 150 | 150 – 175 | 170 – 180 | 175 – 185 | 180 – 190 | 185 + |
PLAYER ELBOWS
To determine the size of the elbow pads, measure the length from the lower edge of the bicep guard of the bib to the cuff of the glove.
KIDS YTH | JUNIOR JR | ADULTS SR | |||||||
US Size | Yth. S / M | Yth. M / L | Jr. S | Jr. M | Jr. L | Sr. S | Sr. M | Sr. L | Sr. XL |
Length, cm | 18 – 20 | 20 – 23 | 23 – 27 | 25 – 28 | 26 – 30 | 30 – 33 | 33 – 36 | 36 – 38 | 38+ |
Height, cm | 100 – 125 | 115 – 140 | 130 – 140 | 135 – 145 | 140 – 150 | 150 – 175 | 170 – 180 | 175 – 185 | 180 – 190 |
SHIN GUARD (PLAYER PADS)
To determine the size of the shin guard, in a sitting position, measure the length from the middle of the knee joint to the top of the skate boot.
KIDS YTH | JUNIOR JR | ADULTS SR | ||||||
US Size | 9 “Yth. L | 10 “Jr. S | 11 ”Jr. M | 12 “Jr. L | 13 ”Jr. XL | 14 ”Sr. S | 15 ”Sr. M | 16 ”Sr. L |
Leg length, cm | 23 – 25 | 25 – 28 | 28 – 30 | 30 – 33 | 33 – 36 | 36 – 38 | 38 – 41 | 41 – 43 |
Height, cm | 110 – 120 | 120 – 130 | 130 – 140 | 140 – 150 | 150 – 160 | 160 – 170 | 170 – 180 | 180 – 190 |
PLAYER’S SHORTS
To determine the size, you need to measure the circumference of the waist.Remember, the length of the thigh protector should be long enough to overlap the top edge of the knee protector, and the back protector should cover a quarter of the back from the waist.
KIDS YTH | JUNIOR JR | ADULTS SR | ||||||||
US Size | Yth. M | Yth. L | Jr. S | Jr. M | Jr.L | Sr. S | Sr. M | Sr. L | Sr. XL | Sr. XXL |
Waist, cm | 55 – 58 | 58 – 61 | 61 – 66 | 66 – 71 | 76 – 86 | 76 – 81 | 81 – 86 | 86 – 91 | 91 – 96 | 96 – 102 |
Height, cm | 100 – 125 | 115 – 140 | 130 – 140 | 135 – 145 | 140 – 150 | 150 – 175 | 170 – 180 | 175 – 185 | 180 – 190 | 185 + |
PLAYER’S GLOVES
The existing traditional sizing system has developed long ago (measuring the distance in inches from the fingertips to the elbow cuff), but it is currently not correct and does not take into account the recent trends in elongation of the elbow cuffs and the fact that the cuffs of gloves are getting shorter.Only fitting can guarantee the right choice. Use the sizing chart only as a rough guide to sizing. To do this, measure the distance between your fingertips and the lower edge of the elbow pad. Determine the approximate size from the table. The choice of gloves and elbow pads are interrelated – the gap between the cuff of the glove and the edge of the elbow pad should be minimal. When choosing gloves with a shortened cuff, use elongated elbow pads or special wrist guards. Do not choose gloves that are too tight in the hope of spreading them – you will need some freedom in your fingers and hands, gloves should not restrict movement.When choosing the upper material, take into account the intensity of the exercises, the possibility of replacing the palm material. The leather upper is more durable and designed for intensive use, the gloves with the polyester upper are lighter, they better fit the hand.
Glove size | Size, inches | Size, cm |
KIDS YTH | 8 ” | 20 |
9 ” | 23 | |
10 ” | 25 | |
11 ” | 28 | |
JUNIOR JR | 12 ” | 30 |
13 ” | 33 | |
ADULTS SR | 14 ” | 36 |
15 ” | 38 |
PLAYER’S HELMETS AND MASKS
In order to provide an adequate level of protection, a hockey helmet must be properly fitted and fitted to minimize helmet displacement and maximize protection.When choosing a helmet for your initial fitting, refer to the size chart for head circumference. Adjust the size of the helmet over the head by loosening the side bolts. The helmet should fit snugly enough and not move with sudden head movements. Be sure to tighten the side bolts after adjusting the exact size. The depth of the helmet must be sufficient and its position on the head must be correct for maximum protection. The helmet should sit on the head so that the lower edge of the helmet is 1.5 cm above the eyebrow line.Adjust the length of the chin strap so that it is lightly in contact with the chin. When using a mask, adjust the length of the strap so that the chin guard lies exactly on the chin and the upper side edges of the mask fit exactly into the locking loops. The tension on the strap must be such that the mask and helmet cannot move.
Helmet size | Head circumference, cm |
S | 51-55 |
M | 55-57 |
L | 57-61 |
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SELECTING SKATES
The size of EFSI hockey skates is the same as the size of regular shoes.The size of children’s skates is selected taking into account the height of the child’s foot during the season, but not more than one size. Determine the size with a ruler and proceed with the careful selection of your skates. Remember, the skate boot should sit on your foot as tightly as possible, your skating depends on it in the future. Put your skate on a simple toe, move your foot back as much as possible and lace up the boot. It is important to perform this shift and lace up the boot during fitting – the heel should go 5 – 7 mm back.If you feel that the heel moves too easily, try on a smaller skate. Get out of your chair and walk on the rubber mat. You should not feel any longitudinal or lateral play in the boot, it should sit tightly on your foot, but at the same time your foot should be comfortable, with your toes you can feel the nose cup from the inside, but not rest against it.
Foot length, cm | Skates EFSI | Euro size | Foot length, cm | Skates EFSI | Euro size |
162 | 26 | Y8 | 242 | 37 | 5 |
170 | 27 | Y9 | 248 | 38 | 5.5 |
178 | 28 | Y10 | 254 | 39 | 6 |
186 | 29 | Y11 | 260 | 40 | 6.5 |
194 | 30 | Y12 | 266 | 41 | 7.5 |
202 | 31 | Y13 | 270 | 42 | 8.5 |
210 | 32 | Y13.5 | 278 | 43 | 9.5 |
214 | 33 | 1.5 | 286 | 44 | 10 |
220 | 34 | 2 | 294 | 45 | 11 |
226 | 35 | 3 | 306 | 46 | 11.5 |
234 | 36 | 4 | 314 | 47 | 12 |
GOALKEEPER HELMET
Put the helmet on your head so that the upper edge of the front cutout is 1 – 1.5 cm higher than the eyebrows. The helmet should fit snugly on your head, excluding any shifts or backlash. The sweat protection strip must be securely attached to the inside of the helmet. The back of the helmet must be adjusted with the straps to ensure a secure fit.When choosing a helmet for your initial fitting, refer to the size chart for head circumference.
Helmet size | Head circumference, cm |
S | 51-55 |
M | 55-57 |
L | 57-61 |
GOALKEEPER CHEST
The bib sleeves must extend to the wrists in order to eliminate gaps in the equipment between the bib sleeves and the goalkeeper’s gloves (trap and blocker).To determine the size of the bib, it is necessary to measure the circumference of the chest.
KIDS YTH | JUNIOR JR | ADULTS SR | ||||||||
US Size | Yth. S / M | Yth. M / L | Jr. S | Jr. M | Jr. L | Sr. S | Sr. M | Sr.L | Sr. XL | Sr. XXL |
Breast volume, cm | 56 – 66 | 61 – 71 | 66 – 76 | 71 – 81 | 76 – 86 | 86 – 97 | 97 – 107 | 102 – 112 | 107+ | 107+ |
Height, cm | 100 – 125 | 115 – 140 | 130 – 140 | 135 – 145 | 140 – 150 | 150 – 175 | 170 – 180 | 175 – 185 | 180 – 190 | 185 + |
BLOCKER AND GOALKEEPER TRAP
For the correct fit of the blocker, select the size so that the glove is exactly on the hand or slightly larger (but not more than 0.6 cm). The goalkeeper trap must provide a snug, comfortable fit on the arm, with no dangling or looseness.
Pancake / Trap Size | YTH / KIDS | JR / JUNIOR | SR / ADULTS |
Palm size, cm | 20-28 | 30-33 | 36-38 |
Height, cm | 120-150 | 150-175 | 175+ |
GOALIE PANEL
The main parameter in choosing the size of the flap is its total length.The total length of the shield consists of two measures: A. Height from the instep of the foot to the middle of the knee B. The desired height from the middle of the knee to the thigh. Measure your leg in a bent position (without shoes) and add parameters A + B.
Shield size, inch | 26 | 28 | 30 | 32 | 34 | 36 |
Size A + B, cm | 26 | 28 | 30 | 32 | 34 | 36 |
Height, cm | 26 | 28 | 30 | 32 | 34 | 36 |
GOALKEEPER SHORTS
Correctly sized shorts should provide freedom of movement, but should not dangle or twist around the waist.To determine the size, you need to measure your waist circumference.
KIDS YTH | JUNIOR JR | ADULTS SR | ||||||||
US Size | Yth. M | Yth. L | Jr. S | Jr. M | Jr. L | Sr. S | Sr. M | Sr. L | Sr.XL | Sr. XXL |
Waist, cm | 55 – 58 | 58 – 61 | 61 – 66 | 66 – 71 | 76 – 86 | 76 – 81 | 81 – 86 | 86 – 91 | 91 – 96 | 96 – 102 |
Height, cm | 100 – 125 | 115 – 140 | 130 – 140 | 135 – 145 | 140 – 150 | 150 – 175 | 170 – 180 | 175 – 185 | 180 – 190 | 185 + |
MITER Adder Goalkeeper Sweater – Goalkeeper Uniform / astrasport
Unfortunately, your search returned no results.Please make sure that the request is entered correctly or reformulate it.
Please enter more than two characters
All search results
90,000 NHL goalkeepers don’t mind bounces
Edmonton Oilers defender Yoann Ovita threw in a touchdown on Monday and Florida Panthers goalkeeper James Rymer shielded the puck. She was in the far patch, and the commentator said that the goalkeeper made a mistake.
This is not the case.
The Panthers were in the lead, Edmonton replaced the goalkeeper with a sixth fielder, three Oilers went to the net hoping to play the finishing move. Rymer did exactly the right thing – he hit the puck behind the backs of these players.
Video: EDM FLA: Trocek scores first hat-trick
Picked up by Panthers’ Jamie McGinn in the face-off circle, 11 seconds later Vincent Trochek scored an empty net.
“There is an opponent nearby, and if the puck is in front of you, there will be problems,” said Rymer.“So you have to hit it harder to get it.”
NHL goalkeepers find it helpful to hit the puck far sometimes, especially if it’s a low shot.
The calculation is simple: the further the goalkeeper hits the puck, the more time he will have to prepare for the re-shot.
“Pay attention to how the goalkeepers play if the puck hits them. They do not catch it, but try to hit it with the pancake as far as possible. If you try to catch the puck, there is a risk that it will fall on the ice,” says the Florida goalkeeper “Roberto Luongo. – Essentially the same thing. The stiffer the shield, the further the puck will fly off, the more time the goalkeeper will have.”
Of course, this does not mean that you always have to hit the puck, and the further the better.
Goalkeepers still want to have full control over the rebounds and ideally catch the top throws tightly, and hit the sliding puck with the stick to partners, into the corner or into the glass.
“It is clear that the best bounce is the one that did not exist,” Rymer said. “It’s best to catch the puck. But this is not always possible. Therefore, now the equipment allows goalkeepers to hit the puck harder and throw it behind the backs of those players who rolled to the goal. in the calculation to finish it in the net. The philosophy has changed, and I’m trying to hit the puck as far as possible. ”
Several goalkeeper equipment companies have picked up on the trend and have launched new shin guards for those who prefer to play in this manner.
Video: DET-FLO: Rymer stops Larkin impressively
Of course, there are goalkeepers who still prefer to play with soft and flexible shin guards. They allow them to control how hard they hit the puck.
Rymer wears Bauer Supreme 2S Pro shields. This is the second generation of a new model, in the production of which new materials and technologies are used. Interestingly, Bauer began experimenting with them in 2012 with the goal of reducing rebound by using a special impact absorbing foam.
However, testing showed that the rebound became stronger on the contrary.