2020 recruits. 2020 College Football Recruiting Rankings: Top Teams and Prospects

Which college football programs secured the best recruiting classes for 2020. How do the top teams compare in terms of 5-star, 4-star, and 3-star recruits. What factors contribute to a program’s recruiting success.

Table of Contents

Analyzing the 2020 College Football Recruiting Landscape

The 2020 college football recruiting cycle has come to a close, with top programs across the nation vying for the most talented high school prospects. This article delves into the recruiting rankings, examining the performance of elite programs and the composition of their recruiting classes. We’ll explore the factors that contribute to recruiting success and analyze the potential impact of these incoming freshmen on their respective teams.

Breaking Down the Top Recruiting Classes of 2020

The 2020 recruiting cycle has seen fierce competition among college football’s elite programs. Here’s a breakdown of the top recruiting classes based on the 247Sports Composite rankings:

Georgia Bulldogs (93.54 rating)
Alabama Crimson Tide (93.44 rating)
Clemson Tigers (93.26 rating)
Ohio State Buckeyes (92.95 rating)
LSU Tigers (91.79 rating)
Texas A&M Aggies (91.11 rating)
Auburn Tigers (90.92 rating)

These rankings take into account both the quality and quantity of recruits in each class, providing a comprehensive view of each program’s recruiting success.

The Battle for Five-Star Talent

Five-star recruits are the crown jewels of any recruiting class, often capable of making an immediate impact at the collegiate level. How did the top programs fare in securing these elite prospects?

Alabama: 5 five-star recruits
Georgia: 4 five-star recruits
Clemson: 3 five-star recruits
Ohio State: 4 five-star recruits
LSU: 3 five-star recruits
Texas A&M: 2 five-star recruits
Auburn: 0 five-star recruits

Alabama’s ability to secure five five-star recruits demonstrates their continued dominance in attracting top-tier talent. However, Georgia and Ohio State are not far behind, each landing four five-star prospects.

Impact of Five-Star Recruits on Program Success

Do five-star recruits significantly influence a team’s performance? Historical data suggests a strong correlation between the number of five-star recruits and a program’s on-field success. These elite prospects often contribute early in their careers and have a higher likelihood of developing into NFL-caliber players.

Four-Star Recruits: The Backbone of Elite Classes

While five-star recruits grab headlines, four-star prospects form the core of most top recruiting classes. These highly talented players often develop into key contributors and future stars. How did the top programs fare in attracting four-star talent?

Georgia: 17 four-star recruits
Alabama: 12 four-star recruits
Clemson: 13 four-star recruits
Ohio State: 15 four-star recruits
LSU: 14 four-star recruits
Texas A&M: 13 four-star recruits
Auburn: 17 four-star recruits

Georgia’s impressive haul of 17 four-star recruits bolsters their top-ranked class, providing depth and potential across multiple positions. Auburn, despite not securing any five-star recruits, matches Georgia with 17 four-star prospects, highlighting the importance of this talent tier.

The Role of Three-Star Recruits in Building Program Depth

Three-star recruits, while often overlooked in discussions of top classes, play a crucial role in building program depth and can develop into key contributors. How did the top programs balance their classes with three-star talent?

Georgia: 4 three-star recruits
Alabama: 6 three-star recruits
Clemson: 6 three-star recruits
Ohio State: 6 three-star recruits
LSU: 8 three-star recruits
Texas A&M: 11 three-star recruits
Auburn: 10 three-star recruits

Texas A&M and Auburn’s higher number of three-star recruits suggests a focus on building depth and potentially identifying underrated prospects who could outperform their initial rankings.

Developing Three-Star Talent

Can three-star recruits become impact players? Many programs have found success in developing three-star prospects into key contributors and even NFL draft picks. Effective coaching, strength and conditioning programs, and opportunities for playing time can help these players exceed expectations.

Factors Influencing Recruiting Success

What contributes to a program’s ability to consistently secure top recruiting classes? Several factors play crucial roles:

On-field success and championship contention
NFL draft production and player development
Coaching stability and reputation
State-of-the-art facilities and resources
Academic reputation and support systems
Geographic location and access to talent-rich regions
Program tradition and fan support

Programs that excel in these areas often find themselves at the top of recruiting rankings year after year. The ability to offer a complete package to recruits – combining athletic, academic, and personal development opportunities – is key to attracting elite talent.

Geographic Distribution of Top Recruits

Where do the nation’s top recruits originate, and how does this impact recruiting strategies? Traditionally, states like Texas, Florida, California, and Georgia have been hotbeds for football talent. However, the landscape is evolving, with other regions producing increasing numbers of elite prospects.

Impact of Geography on Recruiting

How does a program’s location influence its recruiting success? Programs in talent-rich states often have an advantage in securing local prospects. However, national powerhouses have shown the ability to recruit effectively across the country, leveraging their brand and resources to attract top talent regardless of geography.

Early Enrollment and Its Impact on Recruiting

The trend of early enrollment, where high school seniors graduate early to join their college teams for spring practice, has become increasingly common. How does this practice impact recruiting and player development?

Accelerated acclimation to college life and academics
Earlier exposure to collegiate strength and conditioning programs
Participation in spring practice, providing a head start on learning playbooks and schemes
Increased likelihood of contributing as true freshmen

Programs that can effectively utilize early enrollees may gain an advantage in player development and on-field performance.

The Transfer Portal’s Influence on Recruiting Strategies

How has the NCAA Transfer Portal affected traditional recruiting approaches? The increasing prevalence of transfers has added a new dimension to roster management and recruiting strategies. Programs must now balance high school recruitment with the pursuit of experienced transfer talent.

Adapting to the Transfer Era

Have top programs adjusted their recruiting strategies in response to the transfer portal? Many elite programs now allocate resources to monitor the transfer market, seeking to supplement their high school recruiting classes with experienced collegiate talent. This approach allows for more immediate impact additions and helps address specific roster needs.

Projecting the Impact of 2020 Recruits

Which 2020 recruits are poised to make an immediate impact? While it’s challenging to predict freshman contributions with certainty, several factors can indicate a recruit’s readiness for early playing time:

Physical maturity and readiness for the college game
Technical skills and football IQ
Opportunity and depth chart situation at their position
Scheme fit within the program
Early enrollment status

Coaches will evaluate these factors, along with performance in practice, to determine which freshmen are prepared to contribute immediately.

Long-Term Potential of 2020 Classes

How might the 2020 recruiting classes shape the college football landscape in the coming years? While immediate impact is often the focus, the true value of a recruiting class typically emerges over time. Programs that can effectively develop their recruits and maintain roster continuity often see the benefits of strong recruiting classes compound over multiple seasons.

Recruiting Beyond the Rankings

Are recruiting rankings the sole indicator of future success? While recruiting rankings provide valuable insights, they don’t tell the whole story. Factors such as player development, scheme fit, and team chemistry play crucial roles in translating recruiting success into on-field performance.

Identifying Underrated Prospects

How do programs find hidden gems in the recruiting process? Successful programs often excel at identifying underrated prospects who may outperform their initial rankings. This involves thorough scouting, evaluation of intangibles, and projecting how a player’s skills might develop in their system.

The Future of College Football Recruiting

How might recruiting practices evolve in the coming years? Several factors could shape the future of college football recruiting:

Continued influence of the transfer portal
Potential changes to NCAA regulations
Advancements in data analytics and player evaluation techniques
Evolving landscape of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) opportunities
Increasing emphasis on mental health and overall student-athlete well-being

Programs that can adapt to these changes while maintaining strong relationships with high school coaches and prospects will likely continue to find success on the recruiting trail.

Balancing Tradition and Innovation

How can programs balance traditional recruiting methods with innovative approaches? Successful recruiting in the modern era requires a blend of time-tested relationship-building techniques and cutting-edge strategies. Programs that can effectively combine personal touch with data-driven decision-making are likely to thrive in the competitive recruiting landscape.

Measuring Long-Term Recruiting Success

How should programs evaluate the success of their recruiting efforts over time? While annual rankings provide a snapshot of recruiting performance, long-term success is often better measured by factors such as:

Conference and national championship contention
NFL draft production
Player retention and development
Academic success and graduation rates
Program stability and consistent competitiveness

Programs that excel in these areas demonstrate the ability to not only recruit top talent but also nurture and develop that talent effectively.

Building Sustainable Recruiting Success

What strategies can programs employ to maintain recruiting success over time? Sustainable recruiting success often requires:

Consistent messaging and program identity
Strong relationships with high school coaches and programs
Effective talent evaluation and projection
Commitment to player development and academic support
Adaptability to changing recruiting landscapes and NCAA regulations

Programs that can implement these strategies while maintaining flexibility are best positioned for long-term recruiting success.

The Role of Fan Engagement in Recruiting

How does fan support impact a program’s recruiting efforts? Enthusiastic fan bases can play a significant role in attracting top recruits by creating an exciting atmosphere during campus visits and demonstrating strong program support. Social media engagement, game day experiences, and visible fan dedication all contribute to a program’s appeal to potential recruits.

Balancing Fan Involvement and NCAA Compliance

How can programs leverage fan support while maintaining NCAA compliance? While fan enthusiasm is valuable, programs must carefully navigate NCAA rules regarding contact with recruits. Educating fans about compliance issues and channeling their energy into approved activities can help programs maximize fan impact without risking violations.

The Impact of Coaching Changes on Recruiting

How do coaching changes affect a program’s recruiting efforts? Coaching transitions can significantly impact recruiting, potentially leading to:

Decommitments from previously committed recruits
Opportunities to attract new prospects aligned with the incoming staff
Shifts in recruiting strategy and target regions
Short-term uncertainty and long-term potential for improvement

Programs that can manage coaching transitions effectively, maintaining relationships with key recruits and quickly establishing new recruiting strategies, are better positioned to minimize disruption to their recruiting efforts.

Stabilizing Recruitment During Transitions

What strategies can programs employ to maintain recruiting momentum during coaching changes? Effective approaches often include:

Clear communication with committed recruits and their families
Retention of key recruiting staff members for continuity
Quick establishment of the new coach’s vision and program direction
Leveraging the excitement of a fresh start to attract new prospects

Programs that navigate these challenges successfully can often emerge from coaching transitions with strong recruiting classes intact or even improved.

2020 Football Team Rankings

The Chase for the Recruiting Champion powered by 247Sports Composite

92.95
- 5-Star
  4
- 4-Star
  15
- 3-Star
  6
93. 54
- 5-Star
  4
- 4-Star
  17
- 3-Star
  4
93.44
- 5-Star
  5
- 4-Star
  12
- 3-Star
  6
93. 26
- 5-Star
  3
- 4-Star
  13
- 3-Star
  6
91.79
- 5-Star
  3
- 4-Star
  14
- 3-Star
  8
91. 11
- 5-Star
  2
- 4-Star
  13
- 3-Star
  11
90.92
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  17
- 3-Star
  10
91. 76
- 5-Star
  1
- 4-Star
  15
- 3-Star
  4
90.74
- 5-Star
  1
- 4-Star
  17
- 3-Star
  5
89. 91
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  13
- 3-Star
  9
90.19
- 5-Star
  3
- 4-Star
  7
- 3-Star
  12
90. 39
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  14
- 3-Star
  9
88.88
- 5-Star
  1
- 4-Star
  9
- 3-Star
  16
90. 34
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  14
- 3-Star
  9
89.54
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  11
- 3-Star
  16
88. 23
- 5-Star
  1
- 4-Star
  10
- 3-Star
  11
90.05
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  10
- 3-Star
  11
90. 74
- 5-Star
  1
- 4-Star
  8
- 3-Star
  8
88.62
- 5-Star
  1
- 4-Star
  8
- 3-Star
  15
88. 46
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  10
- 3-Star
  15
87.16
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  6
- 3-Star
  16
87. 96
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  8
- 3-Star
  16
88.02
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  8
- 3-Star
  13
88. 49
- 5-Star
  1
- 4-Star
  5
- 3-Star
  13
88.39
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  7
- 3-Star
  16
87. 83
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  5
- 3-Star
  15
87.17
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  4
- 3-Star
  20
87. 51
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  5
- 3-Star
  18
86.52
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  4
- 3-Star
  17
86. 74
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  4
- 3-Star
  17
85.62
- 5-Star
  1
- 4-Star
  2
- 3-Star
  24
86. 47
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  5
- 3-Star
  17
86.94
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  4
- 3-Star
  16
87. 24
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  4
- 3-Star
  14
86.44
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  1
- 3-Star
  20
85. 63
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  4
- 3-Star
  19
86.44
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  1
- 3-Star
  21
85. 80
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  2
- 3-Star
  22
85.66
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  1
- 3-Star
  25
85. 46
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  1
- 3-Star
  22
85.31
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  3
- 3-Star
  19
85. 55
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  0
- 3-Star
  26
85.66
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  2
- 3-Star
  18
85. 68
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  0
- 3-Star
  22
86.07
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  2
- 3-Star
  15
85. 11
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  1
- 3-Star
  22
86.50
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  1
- 3-Star
  16
85. 16
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  1
- 3-Star
  22
86.18
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  2
- 3-Star
  14
85. 53
- 5-Star
  0
- 4-Star
  3
- 3-Star
  15
Load More

ESPN Football Recruiting – Player Rankings

RK	PLAYER	POS	HOMETOWN	HT	WT	STARS	GRADE	SCHOOL
1		WR	Catawissa, PA Southern Columbia High School	6’2”	200		93	Ohio State Signed
2		DE	Sanford, NC Lee County High School	6’6”	235		92	N Carolina Signed
3		DT	Damascus, MD Damascus High School	6’5”	290		92	Clemson Signed
4		DE	Columbia, SC Hammond School	6’4”	250		91	S Carolina Signed
5		QB-DT	Santa Ana, CA Mater Dei High School	6’0”	180		91	Alabama Signed
6		TE-Y	Marietta, GA Marietta High School	6’6”	255		91	LSU Signed
7		DE	Baltimore, MD St. Frances Academy	6’3”	220		91	Alabama Signed
8		CB	Scottsdale, AZ Saguaro High School	6’2”	200		91	Georgia Signed
9		OT	Lithonia, GA Lithonia High School	6’5”	300		91	Georgia Signed
10		ILB	Upland, CA Upland High School	6’2”	225		91	Oregon Signed
11		OT	Cincinnati, OH Princeton High School	6’6”	280		90	Ohio State Signed
12		DT	Apopka, FL Apopka High School	6’4”	300		90	Georgia Signed
13		DE	Powder Springs, GA Hillgrove High School	6’5”	271		90	Clemson Signed
14		OT	Norcross, GA Greater Atlanta Christian School	6’6”	323		90	Stanford Signed
15		OLB	Burien, WA John F. Kennedy High School	6’3”	227		90	Washington Signed
16		RB	Houston, TX North Shore High School	6’0”	200		90	TCU Committed 05/10/2020
17		DT	Lake Wales, FL Lake Wales High School	6’6”	280		90	Florida Signed
18		ILB	Washington, DC St. John’s College High School	6’2”	233		89	Georgia Signed
19		TE-Y	Las Vegas, NV Desert Pines High School	6’8”	250		89	Georgia Signed
20		RB	Hogansville, GA Callaway High School	6’0”	205		88	Auburn Signed
21		RB	Tucson, AZ Salpointe Catholic High School	5’11”	195		88	Texas Signed
22		WR	Washington, DC St. John’s College High School	6’0”	190		87	Maryland Signed
23		RB	Lakeland, FL Lakeland High School	5’10”	190		87	Clemson Signed
24		CB	Raytown, MO Raytown High School	6’0”	185		86	Oregon Signed
25		ATH	Lakeland, FL Lakeland High School	6’0”	170		86	Georgia Signed
26		DT	Bradenton, FL IMG Academy	6’5”	290		86	Clemson Signed
27		ILB	Orem, UT Orem High School	6’2”	245		86	Oregon Signed
28		OLB	Sugar Hill, GA Lanier High School	6’4”	225		86	LSU Signed
29		OG	Raleigh, NC Leesville Road High School	6’4”	315		86	Clemson Signed
30		RB	Chester, VA Thomas Dale High School	5’9”	171		86	Notre Dame Signed
31		OLB	Brentwood, TN Ravenwood High School	6’4”	240		86	Oklahoma Signed
32		ATH	Port Huron, MI Port Huron Northern High School	6’5”	230		86	Michigan Signed
33		WR	New Iberia, LA Westgate High School	5’10”	180		86	LSU Signed
34		ATH	Duncanville, TX Duncanville High School	6’2”	220		86	Texas Signed
35		CB	Cibolo, TX Byron P. Steele II High School	6’1”	190		86	Texas A&M Signed
36		ATH	Denton, TX Billy Ryan High School	6’5”	220		86	Alabama Signed
37		DT	Baton Rouge, LA University Laboratory School	6’4”	290		86	LSU Signed
38		DE	Chesapeake, VA Indian River High School	6’2”	235		86	Florida Signed
39		CB	Bradenton, FL IMG Academy	6’2”	190		86	LSU Signed
40		QB-DT	Austin, TX Lake Travis High School	6’2”	180		86	Texas Signed
41		RB	Aledo, TX Aledo High School	5’11”	200		86	Alabama Signed
42		OLB	Warner Robins, GA Houston County High School	6’0”	220		86	Auburn Signed
43		QB-PP	Bellflower, CA St. John Bosco High School	6’5”	243		86	Clemson Signed
44		DT	Washington, DC St. John’s College High School	6’3”	308		86	Clemson Signed
45		WR	Fort Lauderdale, FL Saint Thomas Aquinas High School	6’2”	190		86	Georgia Signed
46		QB-DT	Longview, TX Longview High School	6’2”	185		86	Texas A&M Signed
47		WR	Tomball, TX Tomball High School	6’2”	180		86	Texas A&M Signed
48		ATH	Dallas, TX Jesuit College Prep	5’11”	195		85	Stanford Signed
49		DE	Hampton, GA Dutchtown High School	6’3”	229		85	Alabama Signed
50		OT	Orange Park, FL Oakleaf High School	6’5”	330		85	Miami Signed
51		S	DeLand, FL DeLand High School	5’11”	170		85	Miami Signed
52		DE	Bastrop, TX Cedar Creek High School	6’5”	280		85	Texas Signed
53		RB	Folsom, CA Folsom High School	5’9”	185		85	Arizona St Signed
54		WR	Saint Louis, MO De Smet Jesuit High School	6’1”	185		85	Notre Dame Signed
55		OLB	Woodbridge, VA Woodbridge High School	6’2”	215		85	LSU Signed
56		RB	Hyattsville, MD DeMatha Catholic High School	5’9”	206		85	S Carolina Signed
57		OT	League City, TX Clear Creek High	6’6”	325		85	Georgia Signed
58		OC	Montvale, NJ Saint Joseph Regional High School	6’3”	280		84	Ohio State Signed
59		OT	Fort Lauderdale, FL Saint Thomas Aquinas High School	6’5”	295		84	LSU Signed
60		OLB	Owings Mills, MD McDonogh School	6’3”	235		84	Penn State Signed
61		OT	Broken Arrow, OK Broken Arrow High School	6’4”	309		84	Oklahoma Signed
62		DE	Orange Park, FL Oakleaf High School	6’4”	220		84	Miami Signed
63		WR	Temple, TX Temple High School	6’3”	180		84	TCU Signed
64		OT	Wales, WI Kettle Moraine High School	6’7”	301		84	Wisconsin Signed
65		CB	Jacksonville, FL Trinity Christian Academy	6’1”	185		84	Clemson Signed
66		RB	Miami, FL Belen Jesuit Prep	5’11”	200		84	Miami Signed
67		OT	Frisco, TX Rick Reedy High School	6’5”	260		84	Oklahoma Signed
68		OC	New Orleans, LA Warren Easton High School	6’4”	302		84	Georgia Signed
69		RB	Hueytown, AL Hueytown High School	5’11”	200		84	Alabama Signed
70		OT	Lawrence, KS Lawrence Free State High School	6’5”	280		84	Nebraska Signed
71		CB	Arlington, TX Arlington High School	6’0”	170		84	Florida Signed
72		OG	Santa Ana, CA Mater Dei High School	6’2”	271		84	Washington Signed
73		WR	Miami, FL Christopher Columbus High School	6’3”	180		84	Florida Signed
74		OT	Rome, GA Darlington School	6’5”	295		84	Georgia Signed
75		DT	Carmel, IN Carmel High School	6’3”	280		84	Penn State Signed
76		S	Duncanville, TX Duncanville High School	6’2”	200		84	Auburn Signed
77		ATH	Orlando, FL Freedom High School	6’1”	180		84	Florida St Signed
78		OT	Littleton, CO Columbine Senior High School	6’8”	310		84	Virginia Signed
79		CB	Baton Rouge, LA Madison Prep Academy	6’2”	175		84	Georgia Signed
80		DE	Houston, TX Cypress Ridge High School	6’5”	280		84	Texas Signed
81		TE-Y	Covington, KY Covington Catholic High School	6’5”	235		84	Notre Dame Signed
82		OLB	Theodore, AL Theodore High School	6’2”	205		84	Alabama Signed
83		QB-DT	Myrtle Beach, SC Myrtle Beach High School	6’2”	189		84	S Carolina Signed
84		CB	Arlington, TX Timberview High School	6’0”	170		84	Georgia Signed
85		RB	Deerfield Beach, FL Deerfield Beach High School	5’9”	185		84	Miami Signed
86		OT	Lexington, KY Frederick Douglass High School	6’5”	275		84	Clemson Signed
87		WR	Miami, FL Carol City High School	5’11”	185		84	Alabama Signed
88		QB-DT	Jacksonville, FL Sandalwood High School	6’4”	190		84	Georgia Tech Signed
89		OLB	Birmingham, AL Jackson-Olin High School	6’5”	215		84	Alabama Signed
90		CB	La Habra, CA La Habra High School	5’10”	185		84	Utah Signed
91		WR	Rockwall, TX Rockwall High School	6’1”	200		84	Ohio State Signed
92		OLB	Charlotte, NC Mallard Creek High School	6’3”	225		84	Clemson Signed
93		DE	Ellaville, GA Schley High School	6’4”	257		84	Auburn Signed
94		WR	Calabasas, CA Calabasas High School	6’6”	220		84	Arizona St Signed
95		OT	Athens, TX Athens High School	6’5”	290		84	TCU Signed
96		RB	Clovis, CA Buchanan High School	6’1”	211		84	Georgia Signed
97		WR	Corona, CA Centennial High School	5’11”	165		84	USC Signed
98		DT	Lucedale, MS George County High School	6’2”	324		84	Texas A&M Signed
99		WR	Calabasas, CA Calabasas High School	6’1”	190		84	Georgia Signed
100		DE	Greensboro, NC Dudley High School	6’4”	275		84	N Carolina Signed
101		WR	Dunnellon, FL Dunnellon Senior High School	6’4”	205		84	Florida Signed
102		ATH	Nashville, TN The Ensworth School	6’1”	190		84	Tennessee Signed
103		TE-Y	Windsor, Ontario, CAN Holy Names High School	6’6”	240		84	Penn State Signed
104		QB-PP	Rancho Cucamonga, CA Rancho Cucamonga High School	6’3”	195		84	Ohio State Signed
105		WR	Bellevue, NE Bellevue West High School	6’2”	190		84	Nebraska Signed
106		S	Tyrone, GA Sandy Creek High School	6’0”	175		84	Alabama Signed
107		ATH	Tyler, TX John Tyler High School	5’11”	190		84	Texas Signed
108		OLB	Saint Louis, MO Lutheran North High School	6’3”	225		84	Texas A&M Signed
109		OG	West Memphis, AR West Memphis High School	6’3”	287		84	Texas A&M Signed
110		QB-PP	Suffield, CT Suffield Academy	6’4”	205		84	Miami Signed
111		DE	Miami, FL Gulliver Prep High School	6’4”	210		84	Texas A&M Signed
112		WR	Frankfort, IL Lincoln-Way East High School	5’10”	175		84	Michigan Signed
113		ATH	Maryland Heights, MO Pattonville High School	5’9”	180		84	Ohio State Signed
114		WR	LaGrange, GA Troup County Comprehensive High Sch	6’1”	186		84	Auburn Signed
115		OLB	Scottsdale, AZ Saguaro High School	6’3”	225		84	UCLA Signed
116		QB-PP	Montvale, NJ Saint Joseph Regional High School	6’3”	196		84	Purdue Signed
117		CB	Winter Park, FL Winter Park High School	6’1”	165		84	Florida Signed
118		WR	Memphis, TN Memphis Central High School	6’3”	205		84	Arkansas Signed
119		DT	Reform, AL Pickens County High School	6’3”	270		84	Alabama Signed
120		RB	Laurel, MD St. Frances Academy	5’9”	178		84	Michigan Signed
121		OT	Miami, FL Miami Norland High School	6’4”	275		84	Florida Signed
122		DE	Marietta, GA Marietta High School	6’3”	209		84	LSU Signed
123		DT	Oak Park, MI Oak Park High School	6’3”	311		84	Kentucky Signed
124		WR	Fresno, CA San Joaquin Memorial High School	6’1”	172		84	Washington Signed
125		DT	Charlotte, NC Providence Day School	6’4”	270		84	Ohio State Signed
126		QB-PP	Queen Creek, AZ Perry High School	6’2”	196		84	Florida St Signed
127		OC	Prosper, TX Prosper High School	6’4”	290		84	Texas Signed
128		OT	Mars, PA Mars Area High School	6’5”	267		84	Notre Dame Signed
129		QB-PP	Watkinsville, GA Oconee County High School	6’5”	214		84	LSU Signed
130		WR	Phenix City, AL Central High School	6’2”	185		84	Clemson Signed
131		RB	Middle Island, NY Christ the King High School	5’11”	200		84	Purdue Signed
132		ATH	Irving, TX Ranchview High School	6’2”	230		84	Oklahoma Signed
133		OT	Eads, TN Briarcrest Christian High School	6’4”	300		83	Tennessee Signed
134		WR	Cumming, GA Denmark High School	6’3”	190		83	Auburn Signed
135		CB	Oak Park, MI Oak Park High School	6’1”	189		83	Penn State Signed
136		OG	Knoxville, TN Knoxville Catholic High School	6’5”	292		83	Clemson Signed
137		DT	Salisbury, MD St. Frances Academy	6’3”	265		83	Tennessee Signed
138		OLB	Jersey City, NJ Saint Peter’s Prep	6’1”	210		83	Ohio State Signed
139		DE	Carrollton, GA Carrollton High School	6’3”	245		83	Clemson Signed
140		S	Rockledge, FL Rockledge High School	5’9”	190		83	Auburn Signed
141		DE	Lake Forest, IL Lake Forest High School	6’5”	270		83	Notre Dame Signed
142		RB	Largo, FL Pinellas Park Senior High School	6’0”	175		83	Florida St Signed
143		WR	Montevallo, AL Montevallo High School	6’2”	180		83	Auburn Signed
144		OLB	Honolulu, HI Saint Louis School	6’2”	202		83	Wisconsin Signed
145		S	Baltimore, MD St. Frances Academy	6’2”	190		83	LSU Signed
146		OG	Alpharetta, GA Milton High School	6’5”	334		83	Clemson Signed
147		RB	Mesquite, TX Poteet High School	5’11”	201		83	Oklahoma Signed
148		OT	Stoughton, WI Stoughton High School	6’6”	245		83	Wisconsin Signed
149		ILB	Fort Valley, GA Peach County High School	6’1”	217		83	Clemson Signed
150		OT	Park Ridge, IL Maine Township South High School	6’4”	265		83	Nrthwestrn Signed
151		CB	Baltimore, MD St. Frances Academy	5’11”	173		83	Oregon Signed
152		ILB	Muscle Shoals, AL Muscle Shoals High School	6’3”	220		83	Alabama Signed
153		RB	Atlanta, GA Carver High School	5’10”	185		83	Miss. St Signed
154		ATH	Camden, NJ Woodrow Wilson High	6’3”	225		83	Texas A&M Signed
155		OG	Memphis, TN Memphis University School	6’4”	310		83	Arkansas Signed
156		DE	Hyattsville, MD DeMatha Catholic High School	6’3”	250		83	Penn State Signed
157		WR	Bellevue, WA Eastside Catholic High School	6’2”	195		83	Ohio State Signed
158		OT	Washington, DC Archbishop Carroll High School	6’5”	310		83	Oklahoma Signed
159		ATH	Ramsey, NJ Don Bosco High School	6’0”	187		83	Wisconsin Signed
160		DT	Sebastian River, FL Sebastian River High School	6’4”	324		83	Alabama Signed
161		WR	Frisco, TX Lone Star High School	5’11”	165		83	Oklahoma Signed
162		S	Tucson, AZ Salpointe Catholic High School	6’2”	183		83	Ohio State Signed
163		CB	Belleville, MI Belleville High School	5’8”	160		83	Michigan Signed
164		OLB	Dallas, TX Highland Park High School	6’3”	210		83	Texas Signed
165		OT	Carthage, TX Carthage High School	6’5”	320		83	Charlotte Signed
166		QB-PP	Norco, CA Norco Senior High School	6’6”	235		83	Oklahoma St Signed
167		RB	Lancaster, TX Lancaster High School	5’11”	190		83	LSU Signed
168		QB-PP	Birmingham, AL Hoover High School	6’3”	210		83	Oregon Signed
169		OG	Ferndale, WA Ferndale High School	6’4”	278		83	Washington Signed
170		S	Fort Myers, FL Dunbar High School	6’0”	200		83	Florida St Signed
171		ILB	Tampa, FL Berkeley Prep	6’3”	235		83	Michigan Signed
172		DE	Cincinnati, OH Princeton High School	6’6”	253		83	Ohio State Signed
173		S	Houston, TX C. E. King High School	6’2”	190		83	Oklahoma Signed
174		WR	Suffield, CT Suffield Academy	6’3”	181		83	Penn State Signed
175		OT	Phoenix, AZ Pinnacle High School	6’7”	270		82	Notre Dame Signed
176		WR	Charlotte, NC Myers Park High School	6’0”	174		82	Texas A&M Signed
177		DE	Knoxville, TN Knoxville Catholic High School	6’4”	255		82	Tennessee Signed
178		RB	Dalton, GA Dalton High School	5’10”	190		82	Georgia Tech Signed
179		DT	Sebring, FL Sebring High School	6’1”	255		82	Florida Signed
180		WR	Sugar Land, TX Fort Bend Austin High School	6’3”	215		82	Texas Signed
181		CB	Southlake, TX Carroll High School	6’0”	190		82	Clemson Signed
182		OLB	Honolulu, HI Saint Louis School	6’3”	217		82	Notre Dame Signed
183		QB-DT	Gainesville, FL Eastside High School	6’4”	235		82	Florida Signed
184		DT	Conway, SC Conway High School	6’3”	271		82	S Carolina Signed
185		DE	Chattanooga, TN The McCallie School For Boys	6’4”	260		82	Auburn Signed
186		QB-PP	Hawarden, IA West Sioux Community High School	6’3”	225		82	Iowa State Signed
187		OLB	Fort Lauderdale, FL Saint Thomas Aquinas High School	6’2”	210		82	Florida Signed
188		WR	Suwanee, GA North Gwinnett High School	5’9”	165		82	N Carolina Signed
189		QB-PP	Newport Beach, CA Corona Del Mar High School	6’2”	200		82	Washington Signed
190		S	Oradell, NJ Bergen Catholic High	6’0”	201		82	Michigan Signed
191		WR	Miami, FL Miami Christian School	6’0”	175		82	Ole Miss Committed 02/20/2020
192		OLB	Crawfordville, FL Wakulla County High School	6’3”	200		82	Nebraska Signed
193		WR	Charlotte, NC Myers Park High School	6’1”	189		82	NC State Signed
194		ILB	Athens, GA Athens Academy	6’2”	230		82	Tennessee Signed
195		DE	Manor, TX Manor High School	6’3”	260		82	Florida Signed
196		QB-DT	Highland Park, TX Highland Park High School	5’11”	180		82	Oklahoma Signed
197		WR	Folsom, CA Folsom High School	6’1”	185		82	Arizona St Signed
198		S	Pearland, TX Shadow Creek High School	6’0”	180		82	Texas Signed
199		WR	Saint Louis, MO Trinity Catholic High School	5’10”	170		82	Illinois Signed
200		ATH	Missouri City, TX Thurgood Marshall High School	5’9”	170		82	Texas A&M Signed
201		DE	Baltimore, MD St. Frances Academy	6’4”	220		82	Ole Miss Signed
202		S	Miami, FL Miami Central High School	6’0”	175		82	Nebraska Signed
203		CB	Broken Arrow, OK Broken Arrow High School	5’11”	179		82	Arkansas Signed
204		QB-PP	Brentwood, CA Liberty High School	6’6”	182		82	Oregon Signed
205		WR	Norfolk, VA Maury High School	6’1”	167		82	Penn State Signed
206		OT	Calera, AL Calera High School	6’5”	320		82	Oregon Signed
207		QB-PP	Concord, NH Saint Paul High School	6’7”	208		82	UCLA Signed
208		OLB	Milton, MA Milton Academy	6’1”	215		82	Michigan Signed
209		WR	Wellington, FL Palm Beach Central High School	6’1”	180		82	Florida St Signed
210		ILB	Rochelle, GA Wilcox County High School	6’0”	215		82	Auburn Signed
211		S	East Saint Louis, IL East St. Louis High School	6’2”	175		82	Texas A&M Signed
212		OLB	Houston, TX Cypress Creek High School	6’1”	200		82	LSU Signed
213		WR	Bradenton, FL IMG Academy	6’1”	190		82	Miami Signed
214		OT	Port Neches, TX Port Neches-Groves High School	6’5”	290		82	Texas Signed
215		DT	Alexandria, LA Alexandria Senior High School	6’2”	331		82	LSU Signed
216		ATH	Philadelphia, MS Philadelphia High School	5’10”	170		82	Miss. St Signed
217		QB-DT	Las Vegas, NV Bishop Gorman High School	6’0”	190		82	Penn State Signed
218		OG	Helotes, TX O’Connor High School	6’3”	280		82	Texas Signed
219		CB	Jacksonville, FL Trinity Christian Academy	6’2”	175		82	Georgia Tech Signed
220		WR	Shawnee Mission, KS Bishop Miege High School	5’11”	178		82	Minnesota Signed
221		QB-PP	New Canaan, CT New Canaan High School	6’1”	175		82	Notre Dame Signed
222		OT	Highlands Ranch, CO Valor Christian High School	6’6”	275		82	Washington Signed
223		WR	Greensboro, NC Dudley High School	6’3”	195		82	S Carolina Signed
224		RB	New Orleans, LA Warren Easton High School	5’11”	190		82	Colorado Signed
225		OG	Columbia, SC Hammond School	6’3”	288		81	S Carolina Signed
226		DE	Gilbert, AZ Higley High School	6’7”	215		81	Colorado Signed
227		OLB	Clinton, NC Clinton High School	6’2”	205		81	S Carolina Signed
228		QB-DT	Missouri City, TX Thurgood Marshall High School	6’2”	180		81	Arkansas Signed
229		S	Shreveport, LA Calvary Baptist Academy	6’0”	203		81	Auburn Signed
230		OLB	Minneapolis, MN Minnehaha Academy	6’3”	200		81	Wisconsin Signed
231		S	West Bloomfield, MI West Bloomfield High School	6’2”	185		81	Michigan Signed
232		DE	Newton, TX Newton High School	6’4”	225		81	Baylor Signed
233		ATH	Lanett, AL Lanett High School	6’1”	206		81	Alabama Signed
234		QB-PP	Jacksonville, FL Mandarin High School	6’5”	225		81	Georgia Signed
235		CB	Little Elm, TX Little Elm High School	6’3”	185		81	Ohio State Signed
236		OLB	Orlando, FL Dr. Phillips High School	6’2”	210		81	Florida St Signed
237		QB-DT	Morrilton, AR Morrilton High School	6’1”	215		81	N Carolina Signed
238		CB	Virginia Beach, VA Frank Cox High School	5’10”	165		81	TCU Signed
239		S	Bradenton, FL IMG Academy	6’1”	190		81	Ohio State Signed
240		DE	Charlotte, NC Providence Day School	6’4”	250		81	N Carolina Signed
241		OLB	Bellflower, CA St. John Bosco High School	6’1”	200		81	Ohio State Signed
242		DT	Decatur, GA Columbia High School	6’2”	297		81	Georgia Signed
243		CB	Harbor City, CA Narbonne High School	5’11”	190		81	Michigan Signed
244		QB-PP	Marietta, GA Marietta High School	6’5”	229		81	Tennessee Signed
245		S	Pinetown, NC Northside High School	6’2”	190		81	N Carolina Signed
246		ATH	Delran, NJ Delran High School	6’0”	195		81	Michigan Signed
247		CB	Grenada, MS Grenada High School	6’1”	165		81	Miss. St Signed
248		WR	Newport Beach, CA Corona Del Mar High School	6’4”	205		81	Stanford Signed
249		DE	Deerfield Beach, FL MTI Prep	6’4”	245		81	Kentucky Signed
250		OLB	Hollywood, FL McArthur High School	6’0”	225		81	Maryland Signed
251		DT	Trussville, AL Hewitt-Trussville High School	6’4”	265		81	LSU Signed
252		CB	Lancaster, TX Lancaster High School	5’11”	180		81	LSU Committed 04/10/2019
253		WR	Venice, FL Venice High School	6’4”	185		81	Tennessee Signed
254		ATH	Norco, CA Norco Senior High School	6’3”	204		81	Oregon Signed
255		DE	Draper, UT Corner Canyon High School	6’4”	250		81	Utah Signed
256		RB	Dublin, OH Dublin Coffman High School	5’11”	195		81	Kentucky Signed
257		WR	Tulsa, OK Booker T. Washington High School	6’3”	180		81	Missouri Signed
258		CB	Homestead, FL South Dade High School	6’0”	175		81	Nebraska Signed
259		ATH	Houma, LA Terrebonne High School	5’9”	184		81	Florida St Signed
260		CB	Trussville, AL Hewitt-Trussville High School	5’11”	171		81	Alabama Signed
261		S	Lufkin, TX Lufkin High School	6’0”	172		81	Texas Signed
262		ATH	Hazen, AR Hazen High School	6’5”	240		81	Arkansas Signed
263		WR	Harbor City, CA Narbonne High School	6’3”	185		81	Alabama Signed
264		OG	Saint Matthews, SC Calhoun County High School	6’3”	315		81	S Carolina Signed
265		DE	Council Bluffs, IA Lewis Central High School	6’3”	244		81	Iowa Signed
266		S	Stone Mountain, GA Stephenson High School	6’1”	191		81
267		WR	Westlake Village, CA Oaks Christian High School	5’10”	170		81	Stanford Signed
268		OT	Fort Lauderdale, FL Saint Thomas Aquinas High School	6’4”	310		80	LSU Signed
269		TE-Y	Red Bank, NJ Red Bank Catholic High	6’5”	226		80	Notre Dame Signed
270		WR	Miami, FL Miami Northwestern High School	5’10”	170		80	Nebraska Signed
271		DT	Bradenton, FL IMG Academy	6’2”	325		80	Nrthwestrn Signed
272		WR	Trussville, AL Hewitt-Trussville High School	6’0”	169		80	Miami Signed
273		ATH	Baton Rouge, LA Madison Prep Academy	6’1”	181		80	Kentucky Signed
274		TE-H	Oak Park, MI Oak Park High School	6’4”	230		80	Purdue Signed
275		DT	Horn Lake, MS Horn Lake High School	6’2”	280		80	Kentucky Signed
276		WR	Powder Springs, GA McEachern High School	6’0”	180		80	Alabama Signed
277		OT	Warren, MI De La Salle Collegiate High School	6’6”	318		80	Ohio State Signed
278		DE	Pearland, TX Shadow Creek High School	6’3”	230		80	Virginia Tech Signed
279		S	Scottsdale, AZ Saguaro High School	6’1”	190		80	Washington Signed
280		OLB	Evergreen, AL Hillcrest High School	6’3”	210		80	Auburn Signed
281		QB-DT	Melissa, TX Melissa High School	6’2”	205		80	Colorado Signed
282		S	Bradenton, FL IMG Academy	6’2”	185		81	Florida Signed
283		S	Bowling Green, KY Bowling Green High School	6’0”	187		80	Kentucky Signed
284		ILB	Senatobia, MS Seminary Attendance Center	6’2”	225		80	Ole Miss Signed
285		QB-PP	Scottsdale, AZ Chaparral High School	6’3”	205		80	Ohio State Signed
286		ATH	Akron, OH Archbishop Hoban High School	6’0”	215		80	Arizona St Signed
287		OG	Live Oak, FL Suwannee High School	6’7”	325		80	Florida Signed
288		OLB	Covington, LA Covington High School	6’1”	195		80	Texas A&M Signed
289		OT	Boston, MA Boston College High School	6’7”	270		80	Boston College Signed
290		RB	Bellevue, WA Eastside Catholic High School	6’2”	198		80	Washington Signed
291		ATH	Carthage, TX Carthage High School	5’11”	175		80	Texas Signed
292		OC	Buford, GA Buford High School	6’4”	270		80	Alabama Signed
293		ATH	Cocoa, FL Cocoa High School	5’11”	170		80	Penn State Signed
294		QB-PP	Buffalo, MN Buffalo High School	6’4”	210		80	Iowa State Signed
295		WR	Las Vegas, NV Bishop Gorman High School	6’3”	185		80	Washington Signed
296		CB	Bellevue, WA Eastside Catholic High School	6’0”	182		80	Stanford Signed
297		QB-PP	Wyoming, OH Wyoming High School	6’5”	185		80	Cincinnati Signed
298		OLB	New Orleans, LA Isidore Newman School	6’1”	210		80	Virginia Signed
299		OC	Knoxville, TN Knoxville Catholic High School	6’3”	285		80	Tennessee Signed
300		OLB	Horn Lake, MS Horn Lake High School	6’2”	225		80	Ole Miss Signed

Updated rankings of top 25 football prospects for 2020

Damascus (Maryland) High School defensive end Bryan Bresee is the top player in the Chosen 25 for 2020, USA TODAY’s list of the nation’s top 25 football recruits in the senior class.

A devastating combination of quickness, power and will, Bresee, a Clemson signee, was named to the top five at The Opening Finals in Dallas in July after dominating the one-on-one linemen challenge.

He won Maryland’s ALL-USA Player of the Year and was first team ALL-USA Defense, after racking up 46 tackles, 34 tackles for loss and 12.5 sacks for the Swarmin’ Hornets.

St. John Bosco High School’s (Bellflower, California) D.J. Uiagalelei is the top quarterback in the Chosen 25, checking in at No. 3.

Here’s the rest of the USA TODAY Sports’ updated rankings for the top 2020 football prospects in America.

1. Bryan Bresee

Damascus (Maryland)

Defensive Tackle / 6-5 / 290

College: Clemson

Bresee is a physically imposing bully of a pass rusher, who uses his size, quickness, explosion and a wide variety of evasive maneuvers to punish his opponent.

2. Jordan Burch

Hammond School (Columbia, South Carolina)

Defensive End / 6-5 / 250

College: South Carolina

This was a big win for Will Muschamp and South Carolina that they had to sweat out until signing day after LSU made a run. Burch uses his athleticism to maneuver around slower offensive linemen and his quick first steps to get where he wants to in the backfield.

3. DJ Uiagalelei

St. John Bosco (Bellflower, California)

Quarterback / 6-5 / 240

College: Clemson

Uiagalelei has a gun for an arm and hits his marks with precision short and deep. His mobility in the pocket allows him to keep plays alive and create.

D.J. Uiagalelei, a long-time Clemson commit, comes in at No. 3 in the final Chosen 25 for the 2020 class. (Photo: KEN RUINARD/Staff)

4. Justin Flowe

Upland (California)

Linebacker / 6-2 / 230

College: Oregon

Top defender in Calfornia is heading north following his decision Wednesday. Flowe is arguably the most feared linebacker patrolling the gridiron in the country. He combines size and agility to consistently stop the run and wreak havoc on the opposing team’s backfield.

5. Julian Fleming

Southern Columbia (Catawissa, Pennsylvania)

Wide Receiver / 6-2 / 200

College: Ohio State

Fleming is a matchup nightmare for most corners because of his elite athleticism and speed (4.3). Fleming also boasts a 43-inch vertical leap.

6. Zach Evans

North Shore (Houston, Texas)

Running Back / 6-0 / 200

Considering: Mississippi, Tennessee, Texas A&M.

Evans is the most talented playmaker carrying the ball in the country, using strength, athleticism, speed and quickness to dominate in all facets. He’ll make his decision after signing day.

7. Myles Murphy

Hillgrove (Powder Springs, Georgia)

Defensive End / 6-5 / 275

College: Clemson

Murphy is a headache of an assignment for offensive tackles because of his speed (4.65) and size. He uses both simultaneously to dominate at the line of scrimmage.

8. Sav’ell Smalls

Kennedy Catholic (Burien, Washington)

Linebacker / 6-3 / 230

College: Washington

Harrison is a ferocious competitor who thrives as a pass-rusher and uses his 4.6-speed to overwhelm the opposition at the line of scrimmage.

9. Elias Ricks

IMG Academy (Bradenton, Florida)

Cornerback / 6-2 / 190

College: LSU

Ricks uses his speed and agility to stay step for step with receivers and his strength and instincts to make plays in the secondary.

Ohio tackle Paris Johnson Jr. checks in at No. 10 in the Chosen 25. (Photo: MICHAEL NOYES FOR THE ENQUIRER)

10. Paris Johnson Jr.

Princeton (Cincinnati, Ohio)

Offensive Tackle / 6-7 / 290

College: Ohio State

Johnson has great footwork for his size and anchors down and gets great position on the line. Johnson has great hands and uses his strong upper body to keep defensive linemen at bay.

11. Bryce Young

Mater Dei (Santa Ana, California)

Quarterback / 6-0 / 185

College: Alabama

Bryce is dangerous, whether he’s creating with his feet or picking the defense apart through the air. A polished and efficient passer, Young uses his athleticism and IQ to beat teams.

12. Kelee Ringo

Saguaro (Scottsdale, Arizona)

Cornerback / 6-2 / 208

College: Georgia

Ringo is an athletic lockdown corner who patrols the secondary and offers strong run support with his physical nature on the field.

13. Desmond Evans

Lee County (Sanford, North Carolina)

Defensive End / 6-6 / 235

College: North Carolina

Evans is super quick and agile, and that translates into domination against the run and as a pass-rusher.

Blue-chip tight end Michael Mayer is headed to Notre Dame. (Photo: JIM OWENS FOR THE ENQUIRER)

14. Michael Mayer

Covington Catholic (Alexandria, Kentucky)

Tight End / 6-5 / 240

College: Notre Dame

Mayer is a load with great footwork and quickness which allow him to get open and create after the catch. Mayer has a high IQ and uses his athleticism and great hands to dominate opposing players.

15. Arik Gilbert

Marietta (Georgia)

Tight End / 6-6 / 245

College: LSU

Gilbert has great size and hands and the speed and quickness to play tight end or wide receiver.

16. Darnell Washington

Desert Pines (Las Vegas. Nevada)

Tight End / 6-8 / 250

College: Georgia

Washington has great size, solid speed and great hands, which make him a matchup nightmare — especially in the red zone. He’s expected to pick his school early next month.

17. Demarkcus Bowman

Lakeland (Florida)

Running Back / 5-11 / 190

College: Clemson

Bowman is a quick and shifty back who maneuvers well between the tackles and on the outside.

18. Justin Rogers

Oak Park (Michigan)

Defensive Tackle / 6-4 / 315

College: Kentucky

Rogers is a ferocious pass rusher who uses his quickness and footwork to outwork offensive linemen. Rogers once doubled as a five-star offensive guard and uses that experience against his opposition.

19. C.J. Stroud

Rancho Cucamonga (California)

Quarterback / 6-3 / 195

College: Ohio State

Rich get richer as Stroud picked Ohio State on Wednesday. Stroud is a skilled passer with the precision to hit tight windows as well deep balls. Stroud’s timing is impeccable, and his reads tend to be the right call.

20. Chris Braswell

St. Frances Academy (Baltimore, Maryland)

Defensive End / 6-3 / 220

College: Alabama

Braswell is quick off the ball and combines the perfect blend of agility and strength, which allows him to dominate the line of scrimmage.

Arizona prep star Bijan Robinson is bound for Texas. (Photo: David Wallace/The Republic)

21. Bijan Robinson

Salpointe (Tucson, Arizona)

Running Back / 6-1 / 205

College: Texas

Robinson is arguably the top all-purpose back in the country, with the ability to hurt defenses as a runner or receiver. His combination of athleticism, speed and agility are exceptional.

22. Tate Ratledge

Darlington (Rome, Georgia)

Offensive Tackle / 6-6 / 310

College: Georgia

Ratledge is quick off the ball and has great hands and footwork, which allow him to protect his area and run block.

23. Haynes King

Longview (Texas)

Quarterback / 6-2 / 185

College: Texas A&M

King is a concise and accurate pocket passer who hits his targets in all areas. He has great feel for the position and is exceptional with his reads.

24. Reggie Grimes

Ravenwood (Brentwood, Tennessee)

Defensive End / 6-4 / 240

College: Oklahoma

Grimes is a dual threat; with his superior athleticism and strength he’s able to control the line of scrimmage and pressure the quarterback on blitzes.

25. Noah Sewell

Orem (Utah)

Linebacker / 6-1 / 260

College: Oregon

Sewell is a big and strong with blazing speed and quickness, which helps him to locate the football efficiently.

2020 Rivals250 Prospect Ranking
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2020 Rivals250 Prospect Ranking

Certain data provided by STATS, LLC
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Alabama Football Recruiting 2020: Top Remaining 2020 Recruits, Class Predictions | Bleacher Report

Vasha Hunt/Associated Press

More often than not over the past decade, Alabama finishes with the No. 1 recruiting class in the country. That could be the case again in 2020.

After closing with the top-rated class in the 247Sports Composite team rankings in eight of the last nine years, the Crimson Tide are currently No. 2 in the rankings behind Georgia heading into national signing day on Wednesday. However, they’re close enough to the Bulldogs that they could move into the top spot before the day is over.

Alabama head coach Nick Saban has been a masterful recruiter during his time at the school, so it’s no surprise the Tide are again in this position in 2020.

Here’s a look at everything you need to know surrounding Alabama entering national signing day.

Top Unsigned Recruits Considering Alabama

Finalists per Hank South of 247Sports.com

McKinnley Jackson, 4-star DT, Lucedale, Miss.
Finalists: Alabama, Auburn, LSU, Texas A&M

Alfred Collins, 4-star SDE, Bastrop, Texas
Finalists: Alabama, Oklahoma, Texas

Sedrick Van Pran, 4-star C,
Finalists: Alabama, Florida, Georgia (committed to Bulldogs)

Ennis Rakestraw, 3-star CB, Duncanville, Texas
Finalists: Alabama, Missouri, Texas

Predictions for Signing Day

The key to Alabama finishing with the No. 1 class in the nation likely lies with McKinnley Jackson’s decision.

Alfred Collins seems set to sign with Texas and Van Pran should honor his commitment to Georgia. If Alabama can get either of those recruits to join, then it would be a huge surprise victory and a big addition to its already strong class.

But Jackson is the most likely unsigned 4-star recruit to sign with Alabama, as the Crimson Tide look to edge their three SEC rivals to land the talented defensive tackle. And Alabama has appeared to be focused on trying to add him to its class.

“It’s clear McKinnley Jackson’s the guy they want,” 247Sports.com recruiting writer Hank South said, according to Alex Byington of the Montgomery Advertiser. “The late signing period is about McKinnley Jackson and adding him [on Wednesday]. They’ve been in on McKinnley Jackson for so long, he’s always had a spot [in the class], he’s a guy they’ve wanted. He’s been the major focus this month.”

With the Tide that dialed in on Jackson, it’s hard to imagine him not joining. So, expect that to happen, vaulting Alabama to the top of the 2020 class rankings.

Alabama should sign most of the recruits who are committed to it but didn’t sign during the early signing period. The only commit who seems to be in position to potentially flip is 4-star defensive tackle Jayson Jones.

According to Byington, Alabama has discussed with Jones the possibility of moving from the defensive line to the offensive line in college. Meanwhile, despite being committed to the Tide, the player recently tweeted that he’ll be deciding between them, Baylor, Georgia Tech and Oregon on signing day.

The prediction here is that Jones will head to Oregon, which brought him in for an official visit two weekends ago and sent head coach Mario Cristobal for a visit this past week.

However, that will be the only bad news for Alabama on the day it locks up its ninth No. 1 ranking in 10 years with another impressive recruiting effort.

National Signing Day player rankings 2020: Top 100 recruits, post-early signing period

College football’s National Signing Day is here, and a few things have changed since the completion of the early signing period on Dec. 20.

That includes updated class team ratings, but mostly has to do with several updates to the 2020 recruit rankings. Six players who were listed as five-star recruits ahead of the early signing period fell to four-star classifications; 10 moved into the five-star category ahead of National Signing Day 2020.

MORE: Top classes & unsigned recruits for National Signing Day 2020

That might not seem important — college coaches will tell you it’s not — but for those who are drawn to class rankings, those changes can make all the difference.

With that, here are the updated top-100 recruits ahead of National Signing Day 2020 (all rankings via 247Sports Composite):

Top 100 college football recruits of 2020

(Unsigned players are bolded).

MORE: Where will Zachary Evans sign?

2020 college football recruits: Ranking top 100 players by position

Dual-threat quarterbacks

Player (overall rank)

1. Bryce Young (No. 2)

2. Hudson Card (No. 57)

3. Ja’Quinden Jackson (No. 73)

4. Luke Doty (No. 85)

Pro-style quarterbacks

Player (overall rank)

1. DJ Uiagalelei (No. 10)

2. CJ Stroud (No. 41)

3. Harrison Bailey (No. 98)

Running backs

Player (overall rank)

1. Bijan Robinson (No. 15)

2. Zachary Evans (No. 16)

3. Demarkcus Bowman (No. 20)

4. Tank Bigsby (No. 39)

5. MarShawn Lloyd (No. 42)

6. Jase McClellan (No. 46)

7. Kendall Milton (No. 53)

8. Jahmyr Gibbs (No. 75)

9. Roydell Williams (No. 76)

All-purpose backs

Player (overall rank)

1. Chris Tyree (No. 69)

Athletes

Player (overall rank)

1. Drew Sanders (No. 22)

2. Darnell Washington (No. 23)

Wide receivers

Player (overall rank)

1. Julian Fleming (No. 3)

2. Kayshon Boutte (No. 24)

3. Demond Demas (No. 25)

4. Rakim Jarrett (No. 27)

5. Jaxon Smith-Njigba (No. 28)

6. Jordan Johnson (No. 36)

7. Gary Bryant Jr. (No. 45)

8. Marcus Rosemy (No. 54)

9. Arian Smith (No. 58)

10. Gee Scott Jr. (No. 65)

11. Xzavier Henderson (No. 66)

12. Jalen McMillan (No. 67)

13. E.J. Williams (No. 68)

14. Quentin Johnston (No. 70)

15. Jermaine Burton (No. 81)

16. Mookie Cooper (No. 91)

17. Josh Downs (No. 94)

Tight ends

Player (overall rank)

1. Arik Gilbert (No. 5)

2. Michael Mayer (No. 31)

3. Theo Johnson (No. 71)

Offensive tackles

Player (overall rank)

1. Paris Johnson Jr. (No. 9)

2. Broderick Jones (No. 11)

3. Tate Ratledge (No. 37)

4. Turner Corcoran (No. 47)

5. Walker Parks (No. 49)

6. Myles Hinton (No. 72)

7. Trey Wedig (No. 82)

8. Andrew Gentry (No. 87)

9. Tosh Baker (No. 99)

Guards

Player (overall rank)

1. Nate Anderson (No. 89)

2. Andrew Raym (No. 92)

Centers

Player (overall rank)

1. Sedrick Van Pran (No. 59)

Strong-side defensive end

Player (overall rank)

1. Myles Murphy (No. 7)

2. Alfred Collins (No. 62)

3. Zykeivous Walker (No. 77)

Weak-side defensive end

Player (overall rank)

1. Will Anderson (No. 17)

2. Chris Braswell (No. 19)

3. Sav’ell Smalls (No. 29)

4. Desmond Evans (No. 43)

5. Donell Harris (No. 48)

6. BJ Ojulari (No. 83)

7. Chantz Williams (No. 84)

Defensive tackles

Player (overall rank)

1. Bryan Bresee (No. 1)

2. Jordan Burch (No. 8)

3. Gervon Dexter (No. 12)

4. Jalen Carter (No. 18)

5. Demonte Capehart (No. 33)

6. Jaquelin Roy (No. 40)

7. Justin Rogers (No. 51)

8. Timothy Smith (No. 55)

9. McKinnley Jackson (No. 61)

10. Omari Thomas (No. 90)

11. Tre Williams (No. 93)

12. Jacobian Guillory (No. 95)

13. Jay Hardy (No. 100)

Inside linebackers

Player (overall rank)

1. Justin Flowe (No. 6)

2. Noah Sewell (No. 13)

3. Demouy Kennedy (No. 38)

4. Cody Simon (No. 74)

5. Antonio Doyle (No. 88)

6. Antoine Sampah (No. 96)

7. Wesley Steiner (No. 97)

Outside linebackers

Player (overall rank)

1. Trenton Simpson (No. 26)

2. Mekhail Sherman (No. 32)

3. Curtis Jacobs (No. 35)

4. Phillip Webb (No. 56)

5. Derek Wingo (No. 63)

6. Quandarrius Robinson (No. 64)

Cornerbacks

Player (overall rank)

1. Kelee Ringo (No. 4)

2. Elias Ricks (No. 14)

3. Dontae Manning (No. 30)

4. Demorie Tate (No. 34)

5. Clark Phillips III (No. 50)

6. Fred Davis II (No. 52)

6. Jahari Rogers (No. 86)

Safeties

Player (overall rank)

1. Jaylon Jones (No. 21)

2. Avantae Williams (No. 44)

3. Brian Branch (No. 60)

4. Antonio Johnson (No. 78)

5. Jordan Toles (No. 79)

6. Keshawn Lawrence (No. 80)

2020 top-100 college football recruits by school

Georgia	11
Alabama	10
Clemson	10
LSU	9
Ohio State	7
Texas A&M	6
Auburn	4
Notre Dame	4
Florida	4
Texas	4

Oregon	3
Tennessee	3
South Carolina	3
Miami	2
Oklahoma	2

North Carolina	2
Penn State	2
Washington	2
Florida State	1
Georgia Tech	1

Kentucky	1
Maryland	1
Nebraska	1
Stanford	1
TCU	1
USC	1
Utah	1
Virginia	1
Wisconsin	1

Top 20 Girls NCAA Swimming Recruits, Class of 2020

NCAA recruiting churns on, and so do our yearly recruit rankings. We’ve already ranked out the top recruits in the current high school sophomore and junior classes, but now it’s time to revisit our recruiting ranks of the graduating seniors.

As recruiting classes get closer to actual NCAA competition, we start to weigh certain factors more heavily: NCAA scoring times become more important, and we tend to value one or two standout events a bit more heavily (compared to a wide range of just decent events) than we would for a high school sophomore who has more time to develop across the board. Having already ranked this class about a year ago, we also get a clearer picture of momentum and trajectory: which recruits are continuing to drop time through their senior seasons, and which have stagnated.

You can look back on our original ranks for this class below, but do remember that those ranks are merely a snapshot in time – we didn’t have a working crystal ball then, nor do we now:

2020 Addendum: as we’ve been noting with all our recruit rankings this year, meet cancellations due to the coronavirus pandemic are throwing a major wrench into times and time drops this season. We’re trying to note when we find swimmers who typically rested for a spring meet (NCSAs, YNats, etc.), or who had their high school seasons canceled (most notably California). But as a whole, we’re relying somewhat less on “improvement curves” this year, and perhaps a little more on long course drops from last summer. These rankings are only a snapshot in time, though, so we won’t do a lot of projecting of who would have dropped time, rather relying on times already swum, whether in short course or long course.

THIS CLASS

Elite class with five or more blue-chip stars at the top
Incredible backstroke group
Strong & deep in breaststroke, with lots of fast risers
Only weakness, if any, is freestyle, particularly distance
A weird lack of improvements among almost everyone in the class

This has been one unreal class to follow up the recruiting pipeline. When we ranked this group as sophomores, we noted that they could challenge the class of 2015 (Katie Ledecky, Abbey Weitzeil, Kathleen Baker, Katie McLaughlin, Amy Bilquist, Ella Eastin, Lilly King) as the best group we’ve ever ranked and quite possibly the best recruiting class of all-time. That continues to hold true.

The top five are historically-good recruits, and you could probably argue that the top-flight, blue-chip recruits extend down even to #7 or #8. Every swimmer in the top 8 has a time that would have made the NCAA A final in 2019. Every single swimmer in the top 20 has a 2020 NCAA invite time. Based on graduating NCAA talent and the strength of this incoming class, we could potentially see freshmen win up to six individual events at NCAAs next spring, assuming they happen.

The backstroke group is the clear-cut leader. There’s world-record-holder Regan Smith at the top, but even the depth is extraordinary. There are four swimmers under 51.2 and 1:51.4 in the backstrokes within this group, with plenty of 52s and 1:53/1:54s for depth.

Breaststroke has risen up to become another strength of the class, with two swimmers under 59 in the 100 – that’s very rare for high school prospects. And breaststroke is maybe the deepest field, with at least nine swimmers between 1:00.7 and 1:01.1 and at least seven between 2:11.6 and 2:12.7.

If there’s a weak point, it’s distance free, where no one is under 16 minutes in the mile. The best 500 freestyler in the class is Smith, who probably won’t be a distance swimmer at the college level. With that in mind, we’ve only got one distance freestyler in our top 20.

Sprint free looks relatively weak compared to the extreme back and breast fields, but it’s really not a bad class. Versatile stroke types still dominate the top of the class in the 50/100 free, but we’ve got a handful of 22-low/48-mid types among the pure sprinters.

The weird part about this class, though, is how little changed between last year’s ranks and these. We’d probably estimate that more than 80% of the swimmers we researched for these ranks had zero short course time drops since last May. We chalk that up to two factors: (1) the elite talents at the top of the class seemed to put most of their focus on long course over the past year, chasing international teams and potential Olympic berths. (2) A lot of the remaining swimmers were probably gearing up for one of three canceled meets – NCSAs, YMCA Nationals or U.S. Olympic Trials.

With that in mind, trajectories and improvement curves probably mean a lot less to this class than in our usual ranks, because there’s just no way to compare swimmers who had vastly different focuses over the past year.

**The 1000 free isn’t an event at the Division I NCAA Championships, but is swum instead of the 1650 in many Division I dual meets and is part of the NCAA program in Division II.

THE METHODOLOGY

Our goal in these rankings is to reflect what college coaches look for in recruits, based on many years of conversations and coverage.

We focus only on American-based athletes, simply because there is so much uncertainty with international recruits – if they’ll come to the states, when they’ll come to the states and with what graduating class they should be ranked. Projecting international recruits often becomes more a discussion of when they’ll first join a college program and not which program they’ll join.

A few other factors that weigh heavily in our rankings:

Relay Value – Relay points count double in college swimming, and any program needs a strong stable of quality sprinters to fill out all 5 relays with studs. Obviously, a special distance swimmer can easily rank ahead of a very good 100 freestyler, but college swimming generally values a sprint freestyler over a distance swimmer, all other factors being equal.
Improvements – Actual times are a the trump card, but any big improvements in quality can make a difference as well. For example, a swimmer who only took up year-round swimming as a junior in high school going the same time as a swimmer whose been swimming year-round since they were 8 will probably get the edge in our rankings. Think Breeja Larson.
Short Course over Long Course – we recognize that some programs, many programs, put their focus with their high school aged swimmers on long course, especially depending on when the high school championships may fall. That said, college swimming is short course, so a swimmer who is great in short course but struggles in long course will have the advantage over the reverse.
NCAA scoring ability – NCAAs are the big show for college teams, so we’ve weighted NCAA scoring potential very highly. Swimmers who already have NCAA scoring times wind up mostly filling out the top our of rankings. Since college athletic directors – and by extension coaches – also place high value on conference championships, scoring ability at conference meets is also a factor in our rankings.
Relative depth in the NCAA and recruiting class – a wealth of elite depth nationwide in one stroke discipline makes a big difference in what times are considered more valuable in that event. Events rise at different rates in the NCAA, but when one event gets extremely deep and fast at the college level, it makes high school prospects in those events a little less valuable, relatively, with lots of other veteran options. In the same way, a recruiting class stacked with swimmers in butterfly, for example, would make each butterflyer a little less sought-after in the market, with lots of other recruiting options able to provide similar production.

Of course, there’s no way to predict the future, and the most concrete data we have to go on are cold, hard times. These rankings in no way mean that all of these 20 swimmers will be NCAA standouts, and they certainly don’t mean that no swimmer left off this list will make big contributions at the NCAA level.

With that out of the way, let’s get to our rankings.

Disclaimer: there are a lot of high school seniors in the country, and no really good, complete, 100% accurate listing of them all. If you don’t see your favorite swimmer on the list, feel free to politely point them out in the comments. There’s a chance that we disagree with your assessment of their spot in the top 20, and so long as it’s done civilly, there’s no problem with differences of opinions. There’s also a chance that we’ve simply missed a no-brainer (we’ve taken every precaution to avoid that), and if that happens, we want to make sure we correct it.

TOP 20 SWIMMERS FROM THE CLASS OF 2020

1. Regan Smith (Previous Rank: #1) – Riptide – Lakeville North High School – Lakeville, MN **Verbally committed to Stanford**
Best Times: 100 back – 49.66, 200 back – 1:47.16, 200 fly – 1:51.24, 100 fly – 50.45, 200 free – 1:43.27, 500 free – 4:37.10, 200 IM – 1:56.58, 400 IM – 4:14.03, 100 free – 48.07, 50 free – 22.51

What more can you say about Smith? She’s an elite talent and quite possibly the best NCAA prospect we’ve ever seen. She’s the American record-holder in the 200-yard back and the #2 swimmer of all-time in the 100-yard back. Those times actually came last spring as a sophomore. Smith appeared to put her focus on long course in the year since then, and boy did that work out well, to the tune of two world records at World Championships last summer. Really the only downside to Smith as a recruit is the high likelihood (historically speaking) that she swims less than four years in the NCAA. She’s very much in the ballpark with Katie Ledecky or Missy Franklin as a prospect, and both swam just two years of college before turning pro. The Olympic delay is going to force Smith into a tough decision: to head to Stanford as planned next year, to defer her enrollment like fellow Stanford star Ledecky did, or to turn pro for the Tokyo Olympics and beyond. Doesn’t seem to be much need for video analysis here to justify a #1 ranking, so just enjoy this 200-meter back from Worlds, and notice how high Smith is able to turn up her arm tempo (and maintain it!) without losing any of the smoothness of her stroke.

2. Alex Walsh (Previous Rank: #2) – Nashville Aquatic Club – Harpeth Hall High School – Nashville, TN **Verbally committed to Virginia**
Best Times: 100 breast – 58.19, 200 breast – 2:05.87, 200 IM – 1:53.69, 400 IM – 4:07.98, 100 back – 50.88, 200 back – 1:51.42, 100 fly – 51.31, 50 free – 22.08, 100 free – 48.90, 200 free – 1:45.05

There are very few classes where this portfolio of times would rank #2. Walsh is an elite prospect in all four strokes who probably projects best as a high-end IM type. Walsh’s 400 IM was 4:33 as of our original sophomore ranks, and went to 4:07.9 by the next year. She really didn’t drop much as a junior, but that probably owes to an increased focus on long course. She, like Smith, is a realistic Olympic hopeful as a high schooler. Last summer, she dropped her long course 200-meter IM from 2:11 to 2:09 and her 400-meter IM from 4:51 to 4:42, so there shouldn’t really be concerns about her lack of improvement in short course. Walsh also has one of the best 50 free times in the class and should be a multi-relay threat. Here you can see each of her four strokes in her most recent personal-best time. (Lane 5, white cap). Backstroke and breaststroke are what really pop, though Walsh could probably use to improve her start some if she’s going to swim the 50 free often.

3. Phoebe Bacon (Previous Rank: #5) – Nation’s Capital Swim Club – Stone Ridge School – Herndon, VA **Verbally committed to Wisconsin**
Best Times: 100 back – 50.70, 200 back – 1:50.71, 100 fly – 51.75, 200 IM – 1:55.39, 100 breast – 1:00.39, 200 breast – 2:12.61, 200 fly – 1:59.96, 400 IM – 4:09.82, 100 free – 49.28, 50 free – 22.45

Bacon has been the fastest riser in this bunch, going from #6 in our original rankings to #5 last year to #3 this year. She’s also really the only one in the top five who has improved her short course times since last year’s ranks. Bacon hit personal-bests in the 100 back, 100 breast, 100 fly and 50 free in December – that event combination does absolute wonders for her value as a relay option. Smith makes all the backstrokers in this class look way less impressive than they should be – Bacon’s 100 back would be the best time we’ve ever ranked if Smith didn’t exist. She’s got NCAA A final times in both backstrokes, and has moved her 100 fly and 200 IM into NCAA scoring range. Bacon is equally impressive in long course, going 58.6 and 2:08.8 (!) in backstroke at U.S. Open in December and winning Pan Ams gold last summer.. Here’s a pretty recent backstroke swim with an up-close look at her technique (Lane 5, yellow “SR” cap). Bacon is all power – she’s got a tiny bit more bounce to her stroke than Smith does, but that’s a decent tradeoff for how high she can crank her arm turnover. Bacon is going to be a major weapon on the front of 200 medley relays with that kind of speed, power, and aggressiveness.

4. Olivia Bray (Previous Rank: #3) – Virginia Gators – Lord Botetourt School – Daleville, VA **Verbally committed to Texas**
Best Times: 100 fly – 50.19, 200 fly – 1:53.72, 100 back – 52.02, 200 back – 1:54.26, 200 IM – 1:58.29, 200 free – 1:46.37, 100 free – 49.20, 50 free – 22.73

Bray is an elite butterfly prospect. In fact, she’s the fastest 100 flyer we’ve ever ranked for both junior and senior classes. If there weren’t world-level prospects at the top of this class, Bray would be a worthy #1-type recruit – in fact, she’s better than a few of our previous #1s. Bray has three very natural NCAA events: 100 fly/100 back on day 3 and 200 fly on day 4. But she’s also got good potential in the 200 IM to better spread out her events. Bray didn’t compete much at all as a senior. She swam U.S. Open in long course, followed by one short course meet a week later, with just one career-best between those two meets. On the other hand, Bray hit a lot of bests last March (and may have had a repeat showing wiped out by the pandemic) and is also good enough in long course (58.3/2:09.6 fly) to conceivably have been saving her best stuff for Olympic Trials this year. Here’s a very old race video (Most of Bray’s bests have come at meets without race video readily available) where Bray shows off her outstanding underwaters. (Lane 5, black cap). Bray has an awesome start-to-15-meter combo, which goes a long way in short course.

5. Isabelle Stadden (Previous Rank: #4) – Aquajets Swim Team – Blaine High School – Blaine, MN **Verbally committed to Cal**
Best Times: 200 back – 1:50.37, 100 back – 51.23, 200 IM – 1:56.55, 400 IM – 4:15.77, 100 fly – 54.39, 100 free – 49.48, 50 free – 22.71

Stadden is more of a 200-based backstroker, about a half-second faster than Bacon in the 200 but a half-second slower in the 100. Her best senior-year drop was in the 200 IM, which has always been a very good tertiary event – Stadden went from 1:59.5 to 1:56.5 and is on the cusp of NCAA scoring level there. She’s got international experience, joining Walsh and Bacon on the U.S. Pan American Games team last summer and winning individual silver and relay gold. The backstroke drops have tailed off a little for Stadden – she cut about a half-second in the long course 100 and a tenth in the long course 200 last year, and her short course times didn’t change. She’s also only cut about a tenth of a second in her 100-yard back since our original sophomore rankings. But Stadden, too, was an Olympic hopeful who probably had her eyes fully on long course for her senior year. Here’s Stadden’s 200-meter back best from December (lane 5, black/pink cap) – she shows remarkable patience and really closes well, surging by Bacon late. You’d like to see Stadden develop a little more front-end speed (especially with the lack of 100 back drops recently), but that can sometimes come with college-level strength gains.

6. Lillie Nordmann (Previous Rank: #6) – Magnolia Aquatic Club – The Woodlands High School – The Woodlands, TX **Verbally committed to Stanford**
Best Times: 200 fly – 1:53.62, 200 free – 1:43.62, 100 fly – 52.00, 100 back – 53.58, 200 IM – 1:58.03, 100 free – 49.05, 50 free – 22.89

Nordmann’s biggest senior-year improvement came in the 200 free, where she cut almost two seconds at Texas’s high school state meet. That’s a very valuable event at the college level, showing a lot of endurance but also relay value, even if Nordmann focuses mainly on fly in college. We might actually project Nordmann as more of a Katie Drabot type, who can cross over free and fly seamlessly while keying in on the 200-yard distance. Last summer, Nordmann did cut from 59/2:10 to 57.9/2:07.4 in long course butterfly, which is extremely exciting. Here’s her big breakthrough freestyle (lane 3 near the top, black cap). She’s got a little bit of a straight-arm recovery that gives her stroke a small bounce, almost a gallop. That’s a little unorthodox for women, but is maybe a new wave of the stroke, popularized by Katie Ledecky. (Check out this awesome race from history and note the difference between the Ledecky/Leah Smith style that Nordmann uses and the Manuel/Siobhan Haughey stroke you see more often in women’s freestyle).

7. Kaitlyn Dobler (Previous Rank: #10) – The Dolphins Portland Swimming – Aloha High School – Aloha, OR **Verbally committed to USC**
Best Times: 100 breast – 58.35, 50 free – 22.01, 200 breast – 2:09.50, 100 free – 48.69, 100 fly – 53.86

Maybe the most impactful time drop in this class was Dobler’s cut from 59.1 to 58.3 in the 100 breast. That takes her from a really good recruit to one of the best 100 breaststroke prospects we’ve ever ranked, and close behind Walsh for the top sprint time in the class. Dobler also leads the class in the 50 free, passing up Walsh this year with a near-21 right before meets started getting canceled. Dobler is going to have tremendous relay value. It seems teams are always short a breaststroker: of the scoring 400 medley relays at 2019 NCAAs, 8 of 15 teams had breaststroke splits over 59, and two of those were over a minute. Not to mention that Dobler could actually be a rare four-relay threat as a breaststroker, based on her outstanding 50 and very good 100 in freestyle. Here’s her national high school record-setting breaststroke from February. It’s not the best angle for the actual swim, but wow do you see the athleticism and power of Dobler’s start. She’s got a couple strokes off of each wall where her head doesn’t get all the way back underwater and that’s a good area for improvement, especially in the 200.

8. Abby Arens (Previous Rank: #8) – Marlins of Raleigh – Saint Mary’s College Prep School – Raleigh, NC **Verbally committed to NC State**
Best Times: 200 breast – 2:08.06, 100 breast – 59.76, 200 IM – 1:56.48, 400 IM – 4:11.49, 100 fly – 53.21, 200 free – 1:47.83, 50 free – 22.96

Arens has a great 200 breast – it would have made the last NCAA A final – and a 100 that would look really good in any class that didn’t have Walsh and Dobler breaking our points of reference. What probably boosts Arens’ value the most in this re-rank is a drop from 1:58 to 1:56.4 in the 200 IM – that gives her a very natural three-event NCAA combo with borderline scoring times in all three. Arens also had a monster long course 200 breast last summer, going from 2:29 to 2:25.8. That ranked in the top 8 nationally for swimmers of any age, and there’s a good argument that it probably suggests Arens has time to drop even from her outstanding 2:08.0 in short course. Here’s that race, with Arens in lane 3 in the black cap. There are a couple of awesome above and below angles that give good insight to Arens’ stroke. She’s got a relatively small but efficient arm pull, and coming up really high out of the water both allows her to do an awesome job keeping her elbows high and adds a good wave/undulation to her stroke. She’s definitely an efficiency breaststroker who is going to limit her stroke count – more Sydney Pickrem than Lilly King. The good sprint freestyles are a nice bonus, and make Arens a potential 7-event contributor at NCAAs at some point – that’s a very high ceiling for a breaststroker.

9. Emma Sticklen (Previous Rank: #7) – Katy Aquatic Team for Youth– Taylor High School – Katy, TX **Verbally committed to Texas**
Best Times: 100 fly – 51.88, 200 fly – 1:54.55, 100 back – 53.01, 200 free – 1:47.86, 100 free – 49.68, 50 free – 22.54

Sticklen and Nordmann have battled in Texas’s high school system for a few years now, and both are excellent NCAA prospects. Sticklen is the sprintier of the two, with an NCAA-scoring 100 fly and a very solid 100 back to go along with it. Sticklen went a little bit backwards in most of her events this year despite having her high school season uninterrupted by the pandemic, but as we’ve noted a lot, it’s hard to nail down which meets a swimmer was really gearing up for. Here’s Sticklen’s swim from Texas high school state in February (lane 4, 4th from the top). She finishes about a half-second off her best, but the race really hinges on one super long wall at the 75-turn. Her underwater kicking speed is incredible, and you can just see the raw talent. It’s the polish and details that keep her behind Nordmann in this race (wall timing, over-swimming the first 50 a bit), but you have to believe college coaches see Sticklen as a high-ceiling prospect who can clean up a lot of those details with time.

10. Anna Keating (Previous Rank: #9) – Machine Aquatics – James Madison School – Vienna, VA **Verbally committed to Virginia**
Best Times: 100 breast – 59.04, 200 breast – 2:09.26

Keating kind of splits the difference between our other two breaststrokers in the top 10. She’s got a little better 100 than Arens and a slightly better 200 than Dobler. Keating didn’t drop at all as a senior, but tended to swim her bests at NCSAs, which were canceled this spring. That’s a shame, because Keating dropped 1.5 seconds in her 100 last year and might’ve been in line for something really special this spring. Here’s Keating in lane 5 (white cap). She’s got two details that she does at such a high level. Her head is always moving forward, even during her recovery as the head is going back under the water – there’s no chin dropping whatsoever. And Keating stays unbelievably low in the water on her turns and just crushes this field that way. Her last 25 shows some visible fatigue, but improving that could push Keating into the low 58s in a hurry. She doesn’t bring a lot of versatility to the lineup yet, but the ceiling for Keating is Lilly King, and we mean that. King was very comparable (59.6/2:09.2) as a senior in high school.

11. Emma Weyant (Previous Rank: 11) – Sarasota YMCA Sharks – Riverview High School – Sarasota, FL **Verbally committed to Virginia**
Best Times: 400 IM – 4:07.63, 500 free – 4:40.85, 200 IM – 1:58.07, 1650 free – 16:30.02, 1000 free – 9:39.41, 200 free – 1:47.34

Weyant is so hard to rank. Every year, we get a few long course standouts – usually in longer events with diminished NCAA value – whose name value is way higher than how their times actually project to NCAA scoring standards. That type of swimmer does not usually have the best track record for actual NCAA production. Here’s why we’re going a little against our better judgement with Weyant: she already has an NCAA scoring time in the 400 IM. But she also put up a long course 400 IM last summer (4:35.47) that’s so unbelievably better than her short course best that we can’t help but project a time drop. (4:35.4 ranked #1 among all Americans of any age last season, and our Swimulator converter roughly converts it to a 4:03 in short course). Weyant also projects to score pretty early on in the 500 free. Relay value isn’t high, but a 1:47 in the 200 is an outside developmental relay kind of time. Here’s that unbelievable 400 IM from Weyant (lane 3, yellow cap). Weyant is so efficient, and just wears down this really, really good international field. She does most of her work on the back half of each 100, which shows how well she keeps her strokes together as fatigue sets in.

12. Tristen Ulett (Previous Rank: #18) – Dynamo Swim Club – Georgia Connections Academy – Brookhaven, GA **Verbally committed to Louisville**
Best Times: 100 fly – 52.01, 200 fly – 1:55.74, 200 IM – 1:56.54, 100 back – 52.76, 200 back – 1:54.28, 200 free – 1:46.18, 100 free – 49.13

Now we’re starting to see the depth in fly/back types in this class. Even beyond the clear first tier, you’ve got great versatile talents like Ulett, who comes within hundredths of NCAA scoring times in the 100 fly and 200 IM. The IM is the fast-rising event for Ulett, coming down from 1:58 last year to 1:56.5 as a senior. Ulett improved a bunch of her times over the course of two different meets this winter, showing a great overall trajectory. This class is so deep, but Ulett is a top-10-type talent in most classes. Here’s her big 200 IM drop (lane 4, black cap). Her wall timing is hit-or-miss in this particular race, but Ulett really uses her legs well, with a powerful fly kick and a dominant flutter kick in the final 50. The way her freestyle leg looked, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Ulett become a really, really good 200 freestyler at the college level.

13. Abby Harter (Previous Rank: #12) – Nation’s Capital Club – Briar Woods High School – Ashburn, VA **Verbally committed to Virginia**
Best Times: 100 fly – 52.31, 200 fly – 1:54.71, 400 IM – 4:12.64 200 IM – 1:59.31, 100 breast – 1:01.22, 200 breast – 2:13.67

Harter should project as a really good IMer, with her outstanding times in the short-axis strokes. Butterfly and breaststroke aren’t a great NCAA combo, but Harter could be a very good fly/IM type in the NCAA. Her senior year drops were mostly confined to long course. In butterfly, she went from 1:00/2:13 to 59.6/2:11.8. Harter also had very good junior-year drops, so her improvement curve was on a really good track before all of the COVID cancellations. (Her 2019 bests mostly came at NCSAs). Here’s a great 400 IM where Harter (lane 6, white cap, towards the top) jumps out on the field with her really efficient, quick-breath butterfly, though you see how backstroke is probably the thing holding back her 400 IM for the time being.

14. Gabi Albiero (Previous Rank: #16) – Cardinal Aquatics – Christian Academy – Louisville, KY **Verbally committed to Louisville**
Best Times: 100 fly – 51.97, 200 fly – 1:55.82, 50 free – 22.36, 100 free – 49.32, 200 free – 1:48.13

Albiero was kind of an upside-type prospect in our early ranks, with good 100 fly speed and a developing 200. She went from 2:01 to 1:57 in the 200 fly as a sophomore, then hit somewhat of a wall as a junior before bursting through again with a 1:55.8 at Winter Juniors last December. Albiero also made huge strides in her 50 free, moving towards the top of the class there and projecting firmly as a sprint fly/free type. Here’s her liftime-best 100 fly, though it’s more than a year old. (Lane 2, black cap). Albiero is powerful and pretty polished with her wall timing and pacing, closing this race really well compared to the field.

15. Janelle Rudolph (Previous Rank: 19) – King Aquatic Club – Bellevue High School – Bellevue, WA **Verbally committed to Stanford**
Best Times: 50 free – 22.29, 100 free – 48.27, 200 free – 1:46.33, 200 IM – 1:56.65, 100 back – 52.44, 100 fly – 53.26, 100 breast – 1:01.75, 200 back – 1:54.02

Rudolph is tremendously versatile, with outstanding 100s of all four strokes, plus a great 200 IM and 50 free. Her sprint free times probably pop off the page best – they’re going to have a lot of relay impact, and both sit within tenths of NCAA scoring level individually. Rudolph is also a great backstroker at both distances, and her 100 fly cut from 56.1 to 53.2 this year. Last year, she hit lifetime-bests in the 50/100/200 free, 100/200 back, and 200 IM at a spring sectional meet that was canceled this year, so Rudolph very well may have ranked higher had we had a normal year of swimming. Here’s a 100 free that isn’t even her career-best (lane 5, white cap) – Rudolph attacks her turns extremely well and has good arm speed, without necessarily having a difference-making flutter kick yet.

16. Chase Travis (Previous Rank: #14) – Nation’s Capital Swim Club – Newark, DE **Verbally committed to Virginia Tech**
Best Times: 1650 free – 16:05.44, 1000 free – 9:31.84, 500 free – 4:41.71, 200 free – 1:49.38

Travis is the premiere distance swimmer in this class, but she gets boxed out a little bit just based on the relay options for pretty much everyone above her. Travis’s best is just two seconds off NCAA scoring level in the mile and only about three seconds off in the 500. Travis didn’t have a lot of time drops as a senior, but shaved a few hundredths off her 500 free and improved her long course times in the 1000 and 1500 last summer as part of the U.S. World Junior Championships team. Here’s an older race video, with Travis in lane 1 (the second lane from the bottom) in the white suit and cap. There’s a little bounce in her stroke that gets more pronounced as the swim goes on, but she doesn’t lose arm speed across the very long swim.

17. Kathryn Ackerman (Previous Rank: #13) – Michigan Lakeshore Aquatics – Grand Haven High School – Grand Haven, MI **Verbally committed to Michigan**
Best Times: 400 IM – 4:07.79, 200 IM – 1:57.25, 200 back – 1:54.37, 200 free – 1:47.17

Purely on short course times alone, Ackerman is a better IM prospect than Weyant, with a slightly slower 400 but a much-faster 200. Ackerman isn’t a bad long course swimmer by any means, either, going 4:46.0 in the 400 IM. It’s been well over a year since Ackerman saw any IM time drops, though, which is a concern that goes beyond just missing this spring’s meets. Ackerman does swim some pretty crowded meet lineups (at Winter Juniors, she went 50/100/200 free, 200/400 IM and 200 back, plus relays), so a switch to college and more specialization might be just what she needs. Here’s Ackerman in lane 2 in the blue cap hitting that 4:07 IM in 2018. Her legs really drop off on backstroke, but she closes well on free, and butterfly looks very smooth for most of that first leg.

18. Samantha Pearson (Previous Rank: HM) – SOCAL Aquatics Association – Foothill High School / Irvine, CA **Verbally committed to Stanford**
Best Times: 100 fly – 52.51, 200 free – 1:45.85, 100 free – 48.92, 50 free – 22.50, 200 IM – 1:57.51, 200 back – 1:54.83, 400 IM – 4:16.35

Pearson was a rangy sprinter in our last ranks, but a drop from 54 to 52.5 in butterfly might make that her primary event. Pearson has had good drops this year, including most of those personal-bests at Sectionals in late February. She’s actually had pretty consistent drops across all three years of our ranks, and that kind of steady improvement is a reassuring sign for continued progress. Pearson should be a relay weapon between fly and free. With her best times mostly coming at Sectionals, there are not a lot of great recent race videos. This older Junior Nationals race shows Pearson’s career-best 100-meter free, though, from lane 5 with the silver cap. Pearson has a great flutter kick and really does her work on the surface of the water, so she’ll have to improve those underwaters to really take off in the NCAA.

19. Katherine “KitKat” Zenick (Previous Rank: N/A) – North Texas Nadadores – Carroll Senior High – Southlake, TX **Verbally committed to Ohio State**
Best Times: 100 fly – 52.53, 50 free – 22.30, 100 free – 48.81, 200 free – 1:49.45

Zenick is very similar to Pearson, with a little more trend towards the sprints and a little less versatilty beyond free and fly. She’s had very good drops, including a full second in the 100 fly and half a second in the 50 free since last year. Here’s her giant 100 fly drop, in lane 4 in the green suit and white cap. Zenick has a really natural butterfly, efficient with a quick breath and a really good snap on both her up-kick and down-kicks. Zenick is also 1:00.5 in long course fly, which is a nice time to be this deep in the rankings.

20. Maxine Parker (Previous Rank: #15) – Cats Aquatic Team – New Canaan, CT **Verbally committed to Georgia**
Best Times: 50 free – 22.20, 100 free – 48.99, 200 free – 1:46.21

Parker is very much a pure freestyler at this point, but her mix of speed from 50 to 200 makes her a great prospect across any of the five relays. She didn’t drop much as a senior (her only drop in those three listed events was a cut of 0.2 in the 50), but her long course 50 crushed from 25.2 to 24.7 en route to World Juniors silver. Here’s the semifinals of that race (lane 3, black cap), which show Parker’s strength and how well she keeps her fingertips down and elbow high from the top of the stroke to the bottom, moving a lot of water with her arm catch.

HONORABLE MENTIONS:

Paring the list down to 20 always feels like pulling teeth. This isn’t an exhaustive list of others we considered, but the top few left off the list who made the decisions on 18-20 very difficult.

Paige Hetrick (Previous Rank: #14) – Bradford Family YMCA– Bradford, PA **Verbally committed to Louisville**
Best Times: 100 back – 52.83, 200 back – 1:53.09, 200 free – 1:45.73, 100 free – 49.13, 50 free – 22.80, 500 free – 4:47.68

Another very good backstroker who just doesn’t quite make the list. Freestyle is a nice crossover stroke that could provide some additional relay options. 56.4 long course freestyle is solid, too.

Emma Atkinson (Previous Rank: #20) – Germantown Academy Aquatic Club – Germantown Academy – Brookhaven, PA **Verbally committed to Virginia Tech**
Best Times: 100 back – 52.80, 200 back – 1:53.77, 200 free – 1:45.77, 100 free – 49.73

Atkinson is very similar to Hetrick – a great backstroke prospect in this deep backstroke class. And she’s a fast riser with almost a second dropped in her 200 free as a senior.

Isabel Gormley (Previous Rank: HM) – Asphalt Green Aquatics – New York, NY – **Verbally committed to Stanford**
Best Times: 400 IM – 4:08.80, 500 free – 4:45.58, 200 free – 1:48.04, 200 IM – 1:59.05, 200 fly – 1:58.38

Gormley is a great 400 IMer who had a smash summer, going from 4:45.0 to 4:39.1 in the long course 400 IM and winning silver at World Juniors.

Megan Deuel (Previous Rank: N/A) – Pack Swim Team of Pittsford – Pittsford High School – Pittsford, NY **Verbally committed to Notre Dame**
Best Times: 100 fly – 52.95, 200 fly – 1:55.70, 100 back – 53.82

A fast-rising butterflier who is already in NCAA invite range in the 200 fly after dropping 2.2 seconds as a senior.

Nicole Oliva (Previous Rank: N/A) – Peak Swimming – St. Francis High School – Santa Clara, CA **Verbally committed to Cal**
Best Times: 200 free – 1:46.32, 500 free – 4:42.51, 1000 free – 10:01.25, 1650 free – 16:28.13, 100 back – 53.71

Oliva has pretty interesting range – a 200 freestyler who can swim all the way up to the mile with some of the better prospects in the class.

Ella Ristic (Previous Rank: N/A) – Irvine Novaquatics – Santa Margarita Catholic High School – Laguna Niguel, CA **Verbally committed to Indiana**
Best Times: 200 free – 1:45.66, 500 free – 4:46.68, 100 free – 49.24

Ristic is in the same ballpark as Oliva, but trends downward to the sprints a little more. Both are great long course swimmers, too, and both missed their high school seasons in California.

Chloe Stepanek (Previous Rank: N/A) – Long Island Aquatic Club – Northport High School – Northport, NY **Verbally committed to Texas A&M**
Best Times: 200 free – 1:45.51, 100 free – 48.76, 50 free – 22.87, 500 free – 4:48.62

Completing the spectrum here, Stepanek is the sprintiest of the final three prospects, but shows tremendous range from 50 to 500.

BEST OF THE REST

New this year: this isn’t an exhaustive list, but we can rattle off a few of the athletes we studied who wound up just outside the top 20 in each event discipline. For the purposes of space, we won’t include every top event for these athletes, but just a few of their standouts. Each of these athletes is still an extremely high-level recruit:

Sprint free:
Distance free:
Backstroke:
Breaststroke:
Butterfly:
IM:

BONUS LOOKBACK:

Feeling nostalgic? Here’s a look back at our recruiting class rankings over the past 7 recruiting classes, plus our retrospective of the first class we ranked after 4 years in the NCAA:

90,000 The Ministry of Defense summed up the results of the spring draft-2020 – Rossiyskaya Gazeta

The recruitment of young soldiers has been completed, and the Ministry of Defense is now summing up the preliminary results of this campaign. The main result is known: from the beginning of April to mid-July, 135 thousand young people were called up for military service, as prescribed by the decree of the President of the Russian Federation. The Ministry of Defense recalled how they were put into the army.

So, due to the danger of the spread of infection, all military enlistment offices of the country were transferred to an enhanced anti-epidemic mode of work in advance.The plans of the draft commissions had to be adjusted by transferring the call of the guys to the assembly points from April to May. At the same time, they were not invited to the commissariats several times. Information about the recruits was clarified by phone or video link. Each recruit was informed of the date and time of the medical examination and the schedule of the draft board. Depending on the epidemiological situation in the region, this could be both in early May and in the middle of the month.

“The conscription commissions began work on May 12, observing all the necessary safety measures in the fight against the spread of coronavirus infection.First of all, citizens who could be guaranteed to be sent to the troops were summoned to the meetings. ” tests to determine the presence of COVID-2019

The dispatch of recruits from assembly points began on May 20. Before leaving for the army, all recruits were tested for coronavirus.And only then each was given a new everyday uniform. Future sailors were dressed in black uniforms, aviators and paratroopers in blue. The rest – in a khaki uniform. All recruits received personal electronic cards for calculating pay. They were provided with medical masks and travel bags, which, among other things, were equipped with hand sanitizer.

Before leaving for the army, the recruits were tested for coronavirus and all were supplied with masks

Note that one and a half thousand recruits with signs of respiratory diseases did not reach all these procedures.They were “weeded out” at the stage of health check.

And one more innovation of this conscription: for the first time, for the transportation of recruits, the military rented more than 2 thousand carriages in passenger trains – more than 83.5 thousand guys went to serve there. Military transport was also used on an unprecedented scale, including military transport aircraft. The guys were delivered to the army even on civil charter flights.

And what about the replenishment of the so-called special units – scientific, sports and scientific-production companies? There was also a call there.More than 450 talented children were sent to serve in scientific and scientific-production companies. More than 150 young members of the Russian national team in Olympic sports have been sent to sports divisions.

“Thanks to the unprecedented measures taken by the military authorities in cooperation with the executive authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, local authorities to provide the necessary amount of medical property, to develop work algorithms and monitor their implementation during the work of draft commissions, recruitment and assembly points of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Federation, as well as careful planning of military transportations, incidents and the penetration of coronavirus infection into the formations and military units of the Armed Forces were excluded, “the Russian Defense Ministry concluded.

90,000 More than 6 thousand recruits will go to serve in the framework of the autumn draft – 2020

Military Commissioner of the Krasnodar Territory Alexander Kuznetsov told “KN” how the current autumn conscription is going on in the region in conditions of high alert for coronavirus infection /

Test for COVID negative – good for service

– Alexander Nikolaevich, for the second time in a row, the call to the Armed Forces of Russia takes place in a pandemic.How are the tasks assigned to the military commissariat of the Krasnodar Territory being fulfilled in this situation?

– The conscription of citizens for military service in October – December 2020 takes place, as in the spring, under conditions of restrictive measures. The difficult epidemiological situation associated with the threat of the spread of coronavirus infection forced us to reconsider a number of issues related to the preparation and conduct of the draft. Thermometry, mask mode, disinfection – these are indispensable conditions and necessary requirements for the employees of the military commissariat today, aimed at preserving the life and health of conscripts.

– Surely, when organizing the security measures recommended by Rospotrebnadzor, the experience of the spring conscription was used?

– Yes, during the period of the spring draft of 2020 in the military commissariats of the municipalities of the Krasnodar Territory, great practical experience has been accumulated and the system of work has been debugged taking into account the prevailing situation of the spread of viral infections.

On issues of conscription, citizens can contact the military commissariats at their place of residence, where they will receive all the necessary information.

Straight lines work. The numbers can be found on the official website of the Russian Ministry of Defense mil.ru in the section “For recruits”. The hot line of the military commissariat of the Krasnodar Territory is constantly working. Her number is 8 (861) 224-64-22 /

At the time of the start of the draft, more than 7 thousand personal files were scrupulously studied, more than 95 percent of the conscripts successfully passed the draft commissions. As in the course of the spring conscription, this fall, at the assembly point of the Krasnodar Territory, an express test is carried out for each conscript and their accompanying persons, as well as all servicemen arriving for replenishment.

All the recruiting offices of the military commissariats of municipalities, the assembly point of the military commissariat of the Krasnodar Territory and the regional assembly point are equipped with non-contact thermometers, bactericidal lamps, medical masks, disinfectants in sufficient volume, the stocks of tests created to check recruits are also sufficient. So there is no reason to panic.

The officers of the military commissariats were instructed. The recruits themselves were informed about the need to use personal protective equipment on the way from home to the military registration and enlistment office.Thus, all conscripts, their parents (legal representatives) can have no doubt that the military commissariat will fully provide a set of sanitary and epidemiological support measures for conscription and will not allow cases of their disruption.

– By the way, about the delivery of recruits to the assembly point, and then to the places of service. Are there any problems with this?

– Not. The transportation of conscripts from the military commissariats of municipalities to the regional assembly point of the Krasnodar Territory, and then to the places of departure, is carried out only by dedicated vehicles that have undergone special disinfection.

Strengthened preventive measures were also taken when sending recruits to places of military service. Each of the recruits is provided with personal protective equipment while on the road. When delivering and escorting the replenishment, contacts with unauthorized persons are excluded, and upon arrival at the military units, a two-week quarantine is provided, after which the recruits are distributed to their units. By the way, last spring and summer, there were no recruits with coronavirus in the military commissariats of the Krasnodar Territory.

From Ground Forces to Presidential Regiment

– Alexander Nikolaevich, what is the task for the military registration and enlistment office of the Krasnodar Territory in the framework of the autumn draft of 2020?

– During the period of the autumn conscription, which began on October 1, over 6 thousand residents of the Kuban will be called up for military service. The first dispatch of recruits to duty stations was successful on 14 October. The first parties of recruits went to serve mainly in formations and military units on the territory of the Southern Military District, where military formations of almost all types and branches of troops are stationed, therefore the range of application of the knowledge and skills of our recruits is quite wide.By the way, the overwhelming majority of recruits who graduated from higher educational institutions will serve in related military specialties.

I would like to note that more than a quarter of all conscripts who will replenish military collectives during this campaign have undergone appropriate training in the structures of DOSAAF of Russia and organizations of secondary vocational education and received military registration specialties that are in demand in the troops.

During the autumn draft of 2020, 218 representatives of Cossack societies, who also have certain military skills, will go to military service.These young men will serve in the ground and airborne troops, in the troops of the national guard.

Another 15 of our fellow countrymen will join the ranks of the Presidential Regiment – their solemn dispatch will take place in mid-December.

– Do young people have the opportunity to choose the type or branch of the army, where they would like to serve?

– The question about which troops are the most attractive for conscripts and why is often asked.The reason is that many young people plan to link their future life with the military.

I would recommend such guys to express their wishes in this regard at the draft boards in advance. We never disregard the opinions of future defenders of the Fatherland. They are taken into account when making decisions, along with indicators of health status, physical fitness and education.

– How would you characterize the physical health of the conscripts in comparison with previous years?

– There is a positive trend.I associate this with the fact that in recent years, not only in our region, but also in the country as a whole, there has been a trend towards a healthy lifestyle. Being healthy and physically strong among young people today is much more popular than having some bad habits. Work on the organization of sports and recreational activities is ongoing. I am glad that Kuban is famous for its sports traditions and achievements.

At the same time, there remains a significant number of citizens subject to conscription, but having health problems.Work with such conscripts is carried out individually, taking into account all the features. Those who, in accordance with Russian legislation, have the right to a deferral or even exemption from conscription, receive them in accordance with the established procedure.

Army prestige grows

– Are there any recruits who want to undergo alternative civilian service?

– Despite the fact that the right to undergo an alternative civilian service is guaranteed by law to everyone and young people are well aware of this, only a few use this opportunity.The list includes a wide range of blue-collar occupations and positions, which each recruit can familiarize with on the official website of the Ministry of Labor of the Russian Federation. Citizens in respect of whom the draft commissions decide to replace military service on conscription with an alternative civilian service, most often express a desire to undergo alternative civilian service in the post offices of Russia. Perhaps, given the current situation, some young people will decide to undergo alternative service in medical institutions – to be as useful to society as possible.

– What is the current situation with the so-called draft deviators?

– Measures to increase the attractiveness of military service and improve the conditions for its passage, taken in the country as a whole and specifically in our region, are yielding results. The action “There is such a profession – to defend the Motherland” has become traditional. Various events of this orientation are regularly held. This topic is very broad and requires a separate discussion. One thing is clear: today military service in the eyes of the younger generation looks much more prestigious and popular than 10-15 years ago.

The attitude of young people towards military service varies from year to year. The overwhelming majority of recruits go to serve with a desire, and many school graduates choose to study in higher military educational institutions. And it is quite obvious that this trend will continue in the near future. Accordingly, the number of those who are ready by any means to avoid serving in the ranks of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation is decreasing.

90,000 In Russia, they plan to call up 128 thousand.recruits during the autumn conscription – Army and defense industry

MOSCOW, September 29. / TASS /. Almost 130 thousand people will join the ranks of the Russian Armed Forces during the autumn draft. This was announced on Tuesday by the head of the Main Organizational and Mobilization Directorate of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, Colonel-General Yevgeny Burdinsky.

“The autumn conscription will be held in all constituent entities of the Russian Federation. It is planned to send 128 thousand people to the troops in the fall of this year,” he said at a briefing in connection with the conscription starting on October 1.

According to the general, “the activities related to the conscription of citizens for military service will be carried out taking into account the experience gained during the spring conscription campaign and the implementation of measures to prevent the penetration of coronavirus infection into the armed forces.”

He noted that military commissariats have already been provided with a sufficient amount of medical equipment, including personal protective equipment.

Spring Summons Results

Burdinsky reported that during the spring draft of 2020, more than 162 thousand were carried out.rapid tests for coronavirus.

“In total, during the dispatch, more than 162 thousand express tests were carried out. Testing of conscripts, representatives of military units who arrived for young replenishment, revealed more than 150 positive results for the presence of infection,” he said in connection with the autumn conscription starting on October 1 …

Burdinsky recalled that after successfully passing the barrier control, the recruits, without contacting the employees of military commissariats, underwent an express test for the presence of coronavirus infection.And only after receiving a negative result, they were sent for a medical examination, professional psychological selection, changing clothes and recruiting military teams.

If a team with conscripts showed at least one positive result, the whole team returned to the municipality to organize treatment.

The General recalled that during the spring conscription, the delivery of young reinforcements (135 thousand people) was carried out in separate trailer cars and on separate flights of military transport and civil aviation.At the same time, the possibility of contacts of recruits with strangers, both at recruiting and assembly points, and when moving to places of service, were excluded.

To ensure the military transport of the young replenishment, then 11 military echelons, 29 flights of aviation aircraft of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, 40 charter flights of civil aviation, as well as road transport of military units were involved. More than 2 thousand separate cars in passenger trains were staffed only by military personnel, in each car there was a paramedic.

In case a soldier fell ill on the way to the place of military service, isolation wagons were provided in the military echelons.

90,000 Recruits’ health comes first – “Red Star”

Tomorrow the next spring call-up will start in Russia, which will be held in special conditions.

Colonel General Evgeny BURDINSKY.

Amendments have been made to the timing of the start of the work of draft commissions and the dates of sending recruits to the troops in connection with the coronavirus pandemic.The Minister of Defense has already decided that the first conscripts will go to the duty stations no earlier than May 20. And this is just a part of the measures that have been taken to ensure conscription events taking place in the context of the spread of the coronavirus.
About how this call will be held and what other barriers from the penetration of pathogenic microbes into the ranks of the young recruits are provided for in the military registration and enlistment offices, – in an interview with the Chief of the Main Organizational and Mobilization Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Colonel-General Yevgeny BURDINSKOGO.

– Evgeny Vladimirovich, the official spring draft starts, as always, on April 1. In this regard, the first traditional question: how many recruits will join the army system?
– In accordance with the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation, 135 thousand people are subject to conscription.
– And if you compare this figure with the same period last year …
– This is the same as last spring. I would like to note that this number fully meets the needs of the Armed Forces.
All types and branches of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, as well as military units of other federal executive bodies will be recruited by conscripts.
– Will the appeal affect the whole country or will there be restrictions somewhere?
– It will be held in 83 constituent entities of the Russian Federation, with the exception of the Komi Republic and the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug. Here, recruiting events are held only in the fall.
There are also regions where this particular – spring – call will be the only one.In accordance with the legislation, once a year – from May 1 to July 15 – citizens are called up for military service in 24 municipalities of five constituent entities of the Russian Federation. These are the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), the Trans-Baikal, Kamchatka and Khabarovsk Territories, as well as the Chukotka Autonomous District.
– What is the reason for this?
– First of all, the physical and geographical conditions of these regions.
– Last fall, some indulgences were saved for conscripts from regions that suffered from floods last year.Has the situation stabilized there?
– Yes, you are right, at that time the problems with the acute post-flood situation really remained relevant, so we took this factor into account during the recruiting events not only in the spring of 2019, but also in the fall. At the same time, an individual approach was applied to citizens called up for military service.
This especially affected the residents of the Taishetsky, Tulunsky and Nizhneudinsky districts of the Irkutsk region. Last spring, when the situation was particularly acute, about 3,000 people were drafted from the region, including more than 40 recruits whose families were affected by the flood.The conscripts and their parents were interviewed on the issue of a possible postponement of the conscription. The same work took place with those whose children had previously been sent to the army for military service, in order, if necessary, to transfer servicemen to military units near their place of residence or to provide them with leave.
– Each time from a call to a call, the military commissariats have to adjust their work taking into account the changing situation. This was the case last year with the flood. Today, as they say, one has to keep abreast of the spread of the coronavirus.How will conscription work be organized to prevent the spread of the disease among recruits and in military units?
– Indeed, the main task that we face today is to prevent the emergence and spread of coronavirus infection among conscripts and military personnel.
Currently, the Armed Forces have not registered a single case of this disease. And the Ministry of Defense of Russia is taking all the necessary measures to exclude the introduction of infection and its spread among personnel.
For this purpose, recruiting and collection points are provided with non-contact thermometers, bactericidal irradiators, test systems, medical masks, and disinfectants. Separate visits to military commissariats were organized using emergency exits. The work schedules of the draft commissions are drawn up taking into account the delimitation by the dates of attendance. Those eligible for release or postponement will be admitted separately from those preparing to replenish the army formation. Those who are not directly related to the activities related to conscription will not be accepted.Changes have been made to the work regulations in order to reduce the simultaneous mass arrival of citizens at military commissariats, at the entrance to which medical posts are deployed. Those who, according to the results of thermometry, will reveal an increased body temperature and signs of an acute respiratory viral infection, will not be allowed into the building.
The modes of ventilation and disinfection of premises have been strengthened. Regular disinfection of door handles, switches, handrails, railings, common areas is provided.
Transportation of citizens to recruiting and assembly points will be carried out using vehicles that have undergone special disinfection treatment.
Health care institutions to which citizens with signs of coronavirus infection will be sent, as well as Rospotrebnadzor organizations, where testing will be carried out, have also been identified.

The Ministry of Defense of Russia is taking all the necessary measures to prevent the introduction of infection and its spread among personnel

– And what measures will be taken to prevent viral infections when transporting young recruits as part of military teams?
– Such measures are indeed provided for and brought to the attention of the military authorities.The movement of the personnel of the military command in the open air, in crowded places – at train stations and airports, without the use of medical masks will be excluded. Provides for a compact isolated accommodation of recruits in the waiting rooms of railway stations and airports, which, if possible, excludes co-location and contact with the civilian population.
Measures are envisaged for the early identification and isolation of a sick serviceman on the way to the place of service.
Arriving military teams from railway stations and airports will be delivered to the point of permanent deployment by road transport of the military unit. The movement of recruits by public transport is excluded.
– When recruits arrive in their units, first of all, will they be quarantined?
– Yes, a set of quarantine measures has been planned with the arriving young replenishment. They will take at least 14 days. At this time, the personnel will be accommodated in separate barracks, food and training will be organized separately from the rest of the military unit.The health status of the arriving servicemen will be monitored constantly, with thermometry at least three times a day.
Recruits with signs of respiratory illness will be immediately isolated, tested for coronavirus infection and receive all necessary medical attention.
– Tell me, will the coronavirus pandemic delay the retirement of military personnel who have served their assigned year of conscription?
– Their dismissal will be carried out in strict accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation.
At the same time, before leaving for the place of residence, each of them will be instructed by the specialists of the medical service on the observance of personal hygiene measures and restrictions caused by the spread of the pandemic. Each serviceman will be given medical masks along the route.
– Will the procedure for granting deferrals be changed due to the spread of the coronavirus in the world and in our country? For example, is it necessary for students to come to the military registration and enlistment office in order to submit a certificate from the university? And who, by the way, still has the right to a delay? What will be the procedure for its registration?
– Especially for persons who are entitled to a deferral from conscription, there are separate opening hours.The list of the grounds for its provision is set out in the Federal Law “On conscription and military service.” The main ones are for health reasons, marital status and, as you have already noticed, for the period of study in educational organizations.
The decision to grant a deferral from military service in relation to citizens is taken by the draft commissions. To do this, you must arrive on the agenda of the military commissariat at its meeting. If there is a supporting document, the draft board will make an appropriate decision.For example, if a citizen has two children, he will be obligatorily granted a deferral due to marital status.
– You have already noted that one of the criteria for deferment is unsuitability for military service for health reasons. What is the proportion of such young people? And what measures are being taken to improve the health of our future nation, the cut of which can be considered a draft contingent?
– At the end of 2019, the indicator of citizens’ fitness for military service was 77.6 percent. For comparison: in 2012 it was only 69.9 percent.Thus, the growth was 7.7 percent. And the figures with an accuracy of a tenth of a percent, I cite not by chance, for each of them – tens of thousands of people. And this is a really significant result that we have managed to achieve thanks to various measures taken both at the state level and at the local level.
I would like to note that the requirements for the health of conscripts are increasing every year. This is due to the high intensity of combat training, the need to master the samples of modern military equipment in the shortest possible time.In this regard, the criteria that determine the state of health of citizens called up for military service are being revised by making changes to the special Schedule of diseases.
– But what about those who have improved their health and want to serve in the army? Not so long ago they also had the right to do so …
– Yes, indeed. For a certain category of citizens who were previously exempted from conscription for health reasons, but want to serve in the army, the law provides for the possibility of a second medical examination.After passing the medical commission, they can replenish the army formation. In the course of each call, there are about 100 recruits.
I also want to note that in order to improve the quality of medical examination of citizens when registering for military service and conscription, centers for military medical expertise were created in the military commissariats of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.
– Another change in the legislation, adopted not so long ago at a public request, is a new procedure for registering for military service.How does it actually work?
– Indeed, in 2019, citizens were given the opportunity to be on the military register at the military commissariat of the municipality where they live. This was done both with the aim of improving its quality and reliability, and in the interests of the citizens themselves.
In addition, in February of this year, a decree of the Government of the Russian Federation determined the application forms for military registration. In this case, the information provided from the place of study or work is considered as a document confirming the stay of a citizen on the territory of the municipality.
– In recent years, there has been an increase in the prestige of military service. The Airborne Forces, the Navy, the Marine Corps, as well as scientific, sports, scientific-production companies, where everyone can find an application for their abilities, are popular among young people being drafted into the army.
However, there are also young people who choose alternative civilian service. Evgeny Vladimirovich, is it possible to pass it in the Armed Forces?
– Yes, of course. It applies to those for whom military service is contrary to their beliefs.In accordance with the decision of the Minister of Defense, during the spring draft, such citizens will be sent to the 2nd Guards Motorized Rifle Division of the 1st Tank Army in Alabino. Here all the necessary living conditions have been created for them.
The term of alternative civilian service for them will be 18 months, and not 21, as for citizens undergoing it in organizations that are not part of the Russian Ministry of Defense.
On the basis of the Military Spiritual and Educational Center being created at the Main Church of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, they will receive medical training under the nursing program and take a course on the spiritual foundations of mercy in the amount of 72 hours.

The main task that we face today is to prevent the emergence and spread of coronavirus infection among conscripts and military personnel

– Speaking about the various alternatives that exist today for conscripts, it is worth noting the possibility, instead of conscription, to go to serve on a contract basis. How can you use it?
– This is possible if the recruit has a higher or secondary vocational education.To do this, you must submit an application to the military commissariat at your place of residence and go through all the necessary measures before the start of the draft – before April 1 or
on October 1.
– And yet there are still those who evade military service …
– Their number is decreasing from year to year. So, if five years ago the number of draft dodgers reached 6.2 thousand, then by the end of 2019 their number became almost four times less. We have achieved such results thanks to measures aimed at increasing the attractiveness of military service and improving the conditions for its passage.As a result, the attitude of young people towards the army as a whole and towards the service is changing, the level of satisfaction with the conditions of which among servicemen, according to the results of monitoring studies carried out already in 2020, was 91 percent.
As a result, the number of conscripts who link their future fate with the army is also growing. Today, there are more and more conscripts who have consciously approached this stage in their lives.
– On the eve of the upcoming great Victory Day, I would like to ask you about the patriotic mood of the young replenishment …
– Indeed, the main feature of this spring call is its holding during the preparation and celebration of the 75th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War, when a new generation of heirs to the winners.I am convinced that each of those who join the army this spring has a hero in his family who has gone through the war. That is why one of the feelings with which they put on military uniforms and go to serve the Motherland will undoubtedly be a feeling of pride and deep patriotism.
– During the call, the Ministry of Defense traditionally organizes a direct telephone line, where anyone can call and get an answer to their question. How do you assess this format of interaction with recruits and parents? How will she work during this call?
– The direct telephone line will work as before.Although it is worth noting that if initially the number of calls was very large, then every year their number is decreasing. This is primarily due to our assistance to the media in covering conscription events, expanding interaction with civil society in all areas of the Armed Forces’ activities.
In addition, many recruits and their parents already prefer to ask questions electronically rather than by telephone.
During the spring conscription of citizens for military service, the direct telephone line of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will begin its work on May 14.Calls will be accepted on Tuesdays and Thursdays Moscow time from 10:00 to 12:00. Direct line phones: 8-495-498-96-96, 8-495-498-96-97, 8-495-498-96-98.
During her work, conscripts and their relatives, we will provide complete information on the entire range of issues about conscription and military service.
Direct telephone lines from April 1 also begin their work in all the headquarters of the military districts and military commissariats of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Their phone numbers can be found on the official website of the Russian Ministry of Defense www.mil.ru in the section “For recruits”.

Julia KOZAK, “Red Star”

90,000 Spring appeal of citizens 2020 – Official website of the Administration of St. Petersburg

“Defense of the Fatherland is the duty and obligation of a citizen of the Russian Federation”, as the Constitution of the Russian Federation says.

Spring Call begins April 1, 2020.

The military commissar of the Kalininsky district of the city of St. Petersburg, Lieutenant Colonel Lichman Oleg Viktorovich noted:

The army is a school of courage that every young man must go through.I am glad that today many young men understand this, that serving the Motherland is not only not a burden for them, but an honorable duty. At the same time, many are striving to get into the elite, combat troops – for example, the marines or the airborne forces.

When making a decision on sending a citizen to the troops, the draft board takes into account both his desire and compliance with the established requirements for military service for health reasons, level of education, physical training, moral and business qualities.Special attention is paid to the results of professional psychological selection. Practice shows that young people who arrived at the district military commissariats at the very beginning of the draft have priority in this matter. They are provided with a wider choice of services and combat arms of the Armed Forces.

Almost every fifth conscript sent to military service in the army has a higher education. Indeed, such conscripts were given a choice.The most talented graduates were selected to recruit scientific companies.

The Ministry of Defense organized food and military uniforms for the recruits at the assembly points. For the Navy – black, for the Aerospace Forces and Airborne Forces – blue, for other types and arms of the troops – protective. Bank and personal electronic cards are also issued.

Delivery to places of military service was organized by road, rail and air.On the whole route of following the young generation, control over the state of health is organized.

To send young replenishment to military units, military echelons were involved. All conscripts on their way to places of service are provided with food rations for the entire journey.

Statistics show that every year the number of young people dodging draft is decreasing. According to the requests of the military commissariat, the police find out the reasons why the citizens subject to conscription do not appear in the military commissariats.It will not be superfluous to recall that for failure to appear at the military commissariat without a valid reason, a citizen bears administrative responsibility in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, and for evading military service in accordance with the Criminal Code – criminal .

Parents and families of conscripts experience the greatest anxiety when they accompany their children to the army. To avoid these concerns, we strive to adhere to the principle of openness. The practice of attending the meetings of the conscription commissions of parents is continued.I want to note that the fathers and mothers of the recruits even have the opportunity to accompany their son to the military unit.

Married conscripts with children, as well as those whose parents are sick or are retired, are sent to serve in the vicinity of the places of residence.

To communicate with parents, relatives, friends, military personnel are allowed to use cellular communications.

For all questions related to conscription and military service, you can contact the military commissariat of the Kalininsky district of the city of St.16 room number 1 from Monday to Friday from 9:00 to 17:00.

90,000 In Germany, they started talking about returning to the conscript army | Analysis of events in political life and society in Germany | DW

Eva Högl, Commissioner of the Bundestag for Servicemen of the Bundeswehr, proposed to start a discussion on the return of universal conscription in Germany. “I think it is a huge mistake that the conscription has been removed. We need to critically review this decision,” Högl said.The statements of the deputy from the Social Democratic Party (SPD) caused a wide discussion in Germany, to which the Minister of Defense also joined. Why did such talk emerge in Germany in 2020, nine years after abandoning the conscript army? And what are the prevailing opinions on this issue now? DW followed the discussion.

Scandal due to neo-Nazis in the elite divisions of the Bundeswehr

The reason to recall the general conscription was a loud scandal: in the special purpose unit Kommando Spezialkräfte (KSK), the elite unit of the Bundeswehr, extremist views were found to have a significant number of supporters of the right-wing views.This forced the Minister of Defense, Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, to begin the reform of the special forces, presenting an ultimatum to his command: if the KSK personnel are not cleared of right-wing radicals and the work with him is not revised, then the special forces will be completely disbanded. One of the mouths was opened immediately and completely.

Eva Högl, Commissioner of the Bundestag for the Service of the Bundeswehr

How does this relate to compulsory military service, the reader will ask himself.The fact is that in post-war West Germany the army was built on the principles of parliamentary control and proximity to society, and its servicemen were supposed to be, by design, “citizens of the country in uniform.” Those who were not allowed by convictions to hold weapons in their hands could refuse to serve in the army – this right was enshrined in the Basic Law of the country. Such persons were involved in alternative civilian service, as a rule, in the social sphere.

All these measures were taken to prevent a chasm between the Bundeswehr and society that could lead to a radicalization of the army personnel.It is believed that these fears were the main reason why military service in Germany was canceled only in 2011. The conscription can only be renewed in the event of an immediate and immediate threat to the security of the country.

Critics: The appeal will not help in the fight against right-wing extremism

The idea of the ombudsman for the Bundeswehr did not find a wide response – it was not supported even in his own party. The tandem of SPD leaders Saskia Esken and Norbert Walter-Borjans in a joint statement noted that universal conscription is not a means to prevent right-wing extremism in the Bundeswehr.Esken later added that she was in favor of introducing the obligation to do civilian service for young people in Germany.

Under fire: special forces of the Bundeswehr KSK

The idea of Högl did not meet with support from the CDU / CSU bloc, the Social Democrats’ partners in the ruling coalition. The clock “cannot be turned back,” Markus Söder, head of the coalition-affiliated Bavarian party CSU, noted about a possible return to the conscript army. The country’s defense capability from such a step “will soon only weaken,” Söder believes.He advocates making volunteer public service more attractive for young people after school and before going to university.

Supported the Commissioner for the Bundeswehr only in the German Reserve Army. However, there, too, they warned against hasty political decisions. “The mandatory appeal was canceled too quickly and without analysis – it would be wrong to return it without analysis,” – said the chairman of the association André Wüstner in an interview with SWR.

Reinstating compulsory conscription, he said, will require a well-designed plan and a willingness to “spend significant amounts of money.” At the same time, he recalled that most Germans are in favor of returning the draft. Perhaps Wüstner is right: the last known sociological study on this topic was carried out in 2018, and then the majority of the country’s residents (55.6 percent) really spoke in favor of the restoration of compulsory conscription to the Bundeswehr.

German Defense Ministry plan: “Your year for Germany”

The German Defense Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer also reacted negatively to the proposal to return to general military service.But she already has her own plan in this regard. The Minister announced that from 2021 a new voluntary service will appear in the Bundeswehr, called “Your Year for Germany”. Young people who decide to take part in it will receive basic military training for six months, and then they will be able to continue their studies or serve as reserve soldiers already at their place of residence – within the next six months.

German Defense Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer

The program involves both military and alternative, that is, civilian service.Ideally, the Ministry of Defense sees the civil service as an antidote to the spread of populism and attempts to split society, because the opportunity to “take responsibility” and “feel respect” would be presented to people with migratory roots, explained Kramp-Karrenbauer.

She promised to present the details at the end of July and then start an advertising campaign among young people. The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic has demonstrated how important the assistance of the army and reserve personnel is, and the new service will only strengthen the Bundeswehr’s ability to defend the country and the North Atlantic Alliance, the German Defense Ministry is sure.

From compulsory conscription to compulsory civil service?

After the abolition of universal conscription in 2011, only voluntary service remained in Germany, which, of course, can be done in civilian life. Opponents of the idea of returning conscription suggest thinking about making civil service compulsory. Moreover, now, as noted by the co-chair of the SPD Zaskia Esken, the situation is such that there are more people who want to do the civil service than there are free places for them.

Like representatives of the Social Democrats, Kramp-Karrenbauer also advocated this idea of ”serving the public good” without fail. But so far such proposals do not find support from those who directly provide assistance to those in need, for example, from Christian unions of charitable organizations. Volunteers come without work experience, they need training. “Employers do not have the opportunity to recruit and help 700,000 young people each year,” said Peter Neher, head of Caritas, the Roman Catholic Church’s charitable network.

According to official estimates, today about 45 thousand people participate in the voluntary civil service program every year. The minimum duration of the program is 6 months, the maximum is two years. For their service, those who carry it receive up to 414 euros per month for pocket expenses, in most cases, accommodation and meals are paid, employers provide volunteers with health and social insurance.

See also:

What the Bundeswehr needs to spend money on (photo gallery)
Long and expensive, or Eurofighter
The Eurofighter fighter is a modern combat aircraft of the Bundeswehr, and one of the most scandalous.The prestige of the project – several European countries participated in the development – were hit by serious operational problems. Eurofighter turned out to be expensive: a single-seat 16-meter fighter costs over 100 million euros.
What the Bundeswehr needs to spend money on (photo gallery)
“Tornado”, which flies only during the day
Deliveries of new fighters are delayed. So the Tornados are still flying, and it is high time to take them out of service – the first such fighter in the Bundeswehr flew 40 years ago.Today there are 86 of them left, but no more than 30 are ready to fly. Some, due to problems with the lighting of the cockpit, can only fly during the day.
What does the Bundeswehr need to spend money on (photo gallery)
How much longer will this old plane fly?
One of the most pressing problems, not only in the Bundeswehr, but also in most European armies, is reliable transport aircraft. The Bundeswehr was waiting for a very long time to replace the C-160 Transall cargo truck developed back in the 1960s.There are no more than 57 of them left, of which no more than 25 fly into the air. It is replaced by the Airbus A400M, but everything is not so simple with it.
What should the Bundeswehr spend money on (photo gallery)
The main headache
Airbus A400M is considered the most modern transport aircraft, but it is also one of the most problematic. So far, the Bundeswehr has received 8 A400M aircraft, but only one is ready for takeoff today, the rest are under repair. After every 20 flying hours, the 45-meter liner is sent for inspection.One of these days one of the new cars broke down in Lithuania, and the old Transall had to take out the Minister of Defense from there.
What the Bundeswehr needs to spend money on (photo gallery)
Helicopters that do not take off
The Bundeswehr has no less problems with helicopters. Due to engine problems in February 2015, it was necessary to temporarily abandon the use of NH90 transport helicopters. After initial problems, it was possible to increase the combat readiness of modern Tiger combat helicopters, out of 37 flying 20.But out of 22 copies of the multipurpose Sea Lynx, only five take to the air.
What the Bundeswehr needs to spend money on (photo gallery)
Problems with armor
The Bundeswehr is modernizing its armored vehicle fleet. But in 2014 it turned out that out of 189 multi-purpose wheeled Boxers, more than half are not ready for use. True, since then there have been no complaints about them. Meanwhile, the Puma infantry fighting vehicles are coming to replace the outdated Marder BMP (pictured), which has served since 1971, now they are in service with 78.The pumas of the first series had a roof leaking, but the defect has already been eliminated.
What the Bundeswehr needs to spend money on (photo gallery)
The Bundeswehr is waiting for proposals from Meads
The Bundeswehr has long decided to update its missile defense systems and replace the outdated Patriot air defense systems. This time, the preference was given to the Meads air defense system, especially since the money of European taxpayers was invested in its development. The infographic shows how Meads works.
What should the Bundeswehr spend money on (photo gallery)
Or is it Patriot?
The contract with the manufacturer Meads has not been concluded yet. One of the reasons is the rise in the cost of the project from four to seven billion euros, according to media reports, citing high-ranking officers of the Bundeswehr. This news was not missed by the manufacturer of the Patriot air defense system – Raytheon. They expressed the hope that their system still has chances and assured that they could make air defense systems that would be cheaper than Meads.
What the Bundeswehr needs to spend money on (photo gallery)
Ships that rarely go to sea
Back in December 2001, Germany ordered five K130 corvettes. They were originally supposed to enter service in 2007. But due to problems with the engines, the air conditioning system and computer programs, the delivery of the K130 to the fleet was greatly delayed. Today, only two out of five corvettes are ready for operations.
What the Bundeswehr needs to spend money on (photo gallery)
At least four out of ten
The Bundeswehr is going to order five more K130 corvettes from 2018, so that at least four of them go to sea on the first order.The Bundeswehr explains the need for the purchase of 90-meter ships with the requirements of NATO. The preliminary cost of the project is 1.5 billion euros.
Author: Mikhail Bushuev

90,000 Army recruits service will begin with quarantine

From the first of October, the traditional autumn call began. What changes await the Don recruits and how many guys are planned to be sent to military service from the region, said the military commissar of the Rostov region, Colonel Igor Yegorov .

– What are the results of the spring draft of 2020 in our region? What will be different about the autumn appeal, what are its features?

– In compliance with the requirements of the legislation of the Russian Federation, in the period from April 1 to July 15, 2020, citizens were called up for military service in the Rostov region.

More than 14.5 thousand citizens arrived at the meetings of the draft commissions in the municipalities of the region.

More than 4,000 citizens were sent to the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and other military formations of ministries and departments.

Of these, 81% (about 3.6 thousand people) were sent to the territory of the Southern Military District, including 68% of citizens (more than 2.4 thousand people), stationed in the Rostov region.

More than 550 citizens trained in military registration specialties were sent to the troops. Over a thousand people were sent to training military units and subunits.

In close cooperation with the Cossack societies of the Rostov region, work was carried out on the preliminary selection and direction of young Cossack men to military units with the status of Cossacks.In the spring of 2020, in accordance with the assignment established by the headquarters of the Southern Military District, about 280 citizens who are in the Cossack societies of the Rostov region were sent for conscription to formations and military units for military service.

In the spring of 2020, more than 180 citizens were sent to the military units of the Black Sea Fleet.

The conscription and dispatch of Don’s recruits took place on time, in accordance with the plan and without incident. The rate of conscription of citizens for military service, established by the President of the Russian Federation, has been fully implemented by the Rostov Region.

In the fall of 2020, it is planned to call up and send about 3700 people to military service. Citizens called up for military service will be sent from the assembly point of the military commissariat of the Rostov region to all types and branches of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and other units, military formations and bodies.

About 20 citizens of the Rostov Region will be sent for military service to the Presidential Regiment of the Commandant’s Office of the Moscow Kremlin. More than 550 people are subject to conscription and dispatch to the Armed Forces and other military formations with the received military specialty in the educational organizations of the DOSAAF of Russia.

During the autumn conscription campaign, about 180 young men – Cossacks are to be sent to the troops.

– How will the autumn call differ from the rest, what are its features?

– The autumn military conscription in Russia will take place within the timeframe established by law – from October 1 to December 31. The main replenishment of the military units will leave in October and November. Before that, young people will be examined by doctors. The traditional composition of the medical commission will also be replenished this year.Another specialist will be added to the doctors who will check the conscripts for the presence of coronavirus. All citizens who come on the agenda will have to pass the coronavirus test. Only those with negative results will be sent to the troops after conducting diagnostic tests. If one of the recruits is found to have a coronavirus, he will not go to military service yet, but may end up in an infectious diseases hospital.

Military service for the recruits of this autumn draft will begin with a two-week quarantine.This is done in case the coronavirus did not show itself during the medical examination. After arriving at military units, the young replenishment is isolated from the main composition for quarantine measures for a period of at least two weeks.

Changes in the legislation of the Russian Federation:

– from July 31, 2020, amendments to the Federal Law of March 28, 1998 entered into force. No. 53-FZ “On conscription and military service.”

Changes affected pp. “And” p.1 tbsp. 24 of the Federal Law of March 28, 1998. No. 53-FZ “On conscription and military service.”

According to the amendments to the law “On conscription and military service” dated 13.07. No. 200-FZ, now citizens who have a child and a wife whose pregnancy is at least 22 weeks (previously at least 26 weeks) will be granted a deferral from conscription until the birth of their second child;

– from January 1, 2020, amendments to the Federal Law of 28.03.1998 No. 53-FZ “On conscription and military service” (Article 24).

According to the amendments to the Law “On Military Duty and Military Service”, now citizens who have entered the service of the compulsory enforcement bodies of the Russian Federation (bailiff service) are granted a deferment from military service if they have a higher education and a special rank – for the period of service in these bodies (these amendments were approved by the Federal Law of December 16, 2019 No. 432-FZ “On Amendments to Article 24 of the Federal Law” On Military Duty and Military Service “).

The future conscript must personally attend the meeting of the draft board.

– From September 1, 2019, amendments to the Federal Law of March 28, 1998 entered into force. No. 53-FZ “On conscription and military service” (Articles 22 and 51).

Citizens who have reached draft age during the period of study in a general education school and have used the right to a deferral in connection with studying at school, as well as in connection with studying at a university under a bachelor’s program, are given the right to another deferral to continue their studies in a master’s program.In addition, citizens who have reached draft age at school will be able to receive a deferment from military service in connection with training not only in higher professional education programs (bachelor’s programs or specialist programs), but also in secondary vocational education programs. The right to a deferral will also be received by those who study full-time at the preparatory departments of state universities at budgetary expense, but only for the period of study at preparatory departments, not more than one year, and if they are accepted for such training in the year of receiving secondary general education ;

– Another change concerns military registration.Now citizens are required to register for military service at the place of actual residence without registration at the place of residence or stay (Federal Law of February 6, 2019 No. 8-FZ “On Amendments to the Federal Law” On Military Duty and Military Service “). According to the adopted law, citizens’ absence of registration at the place of residence or stay cannot serve as a basis for refusing to register them for military registration. This amendment to the law will ensure the quality and reliability of military registration, as well as expand the possibilities for conscription of citizens for military service;

– conscription commissions will continue to implement Federal Law No. 170 of 2013 in terms of implementing measures to increase the prestige and attractiveness of conscript military service.At a meeting of the draft board, the status of citizens who have reached the age of 27 and have not completed military service by conscription will be determined, without having legal grounds. On August 5, 2017, Federal Law No. 192 came into force, which establishes a 10-year prohibition period for filling positions in the state civil and municipal services for citizens who have not been conscripted for military service, without having legal grounds. Military commissioners will send written notifications to the heads of the state or municipal body in which such a citizen works;

– measures will continue to provide citizens called up for military service and sent for military service in the Russian Armed Forces with personal electronic cards (electronic passports) of a military officer;

– servicemen departing as part of a military command from the assembly point will be provided with photographic material about the first day of military service;

– all servicemen will be provided with personal hygiene products;

– servicemen sent from the assembly point will be provided with bank cards of credit institutions;

– for communication with relatives and friends at reduced rates, the provision of sim cards to recruits will continue;

– parents of conscripts will be given the opportunity to attend the meeting of the draft board and accompany the military team to the place of military service;

– The Russian army has changed its appearance.Each branch of the military receives its own set of everyday uniforms. The uniforms of paratroopers, rescuers, marines and motorized riflemen differ in color. Along with the new set of clothes, new rules for wearing military uniforms have been introduced;

– it is planned to increase the number of citizens sent for military service by conscription to military units with the status of Cossacks; in the fall of this year, about 180 people will be sent to these military units.

– What work is being carried out by the military commissariats and law enforcement agencies of the region to prevent the facts of evasion from military service?

– In the Rostov region, military commissars and draft commissions in municipalities conduct explanatory work with conscripts and their parents in order to convince citizens of the need to comply with draft legislation and inform about the consequences that may occur in cases of its violation.

Every citizen living in the territory of our region should know that, having evaded conscription today, tomorrow he will no longer be able with impunity, waiting for the age of 27, to receive a military registration document and subsequently get a prestigious job.

Analyzing the 2020 College Football Recruiting Landscape

Breaking Down the Top Recruiting Classes of 2020

The Battle for Five-Star Talent

Impact of Five-Star Recruits on Program Success

Four-Star Recruits: The Backbone of Elite Classes

The Role of Three-Star Recruits in Building Program Depth

Developing Three-Star Talent

Factors Influencing Recruiting Success

Geographic Distribution of Top Recruits

Impact of Geography on Recruiting

Early Enrollment and Its Impact on Recruiting

The Transfer Portal’s Influence on Recruiting Strategies

Adapting to the Transfer Era

Projecting the Impact of 2020 Recruits

Long-Term Potential of 2020 Classes

Recruiting Beyond the Rankings

Identifying Underrated Prospects

The Future of College Football Recruiting

Balancing Tradition and Innovation

Measuring Long-Term Recruiting Success

Building Sustainable Recruiting Success

The Role of Fan Engagement in Recruiting

Balancing Fan Involvement and NCAA Compliance

The Impact of Coaching Changes on Recruiting

Stabilizing Recruitment During Transitions

2020 Football Team Rankings

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star

5-Star

4-Star

3-Star