How does the Maverik Tank 2.0 improve upon its predecessor. What are the key features and performance enhancements of this new lacrosse head. Is it worth the upgrade for current Tank users. How does it compare to other popular lacrosse heads on the market.
The Evolution of the Maverik Tank: From Original to 2.0
The lacrosse world has been abuzz with anticipation since Maverik announced the release of their Tank 2.0 lacrosse head. As a follow-up to the groundbreaking original Tank model, which revolutionized the sport in 2017, the 2.0 version promises enhanced performance and durability. But does it live up to the hype?
The original Tank head made waves with its unique angular design and stiff construction, offering unprecedented ball control and shooting accuracy. Now, the Tank 2.0 aims to build upon this solid foundation while addressing some of the minor shortcomings of its predecessor.
Retaining the Iconic Shape with Subtle Enhancements
At first glance, the Tank 2.0 maintains the distinctive silhouette that made the original so recognizable – wide at the scoop and quickly tapering to a narrow throat. However, a closer inspection reveals several performance-boosting modifications that set it apart from its predecessor.
Key Features and Improvements of the Maverik Tank 2.0
The Tank 2.0 introduces several notable upgrades that aim to elevate its performance on the field:
- Gen3 technology: A new polymer blend reinforces high-stress areas, reducing denting and deformation
- Thicker scoop: 15% increase in thickness prevents warping and improves ball handling
- Redesigned rail and sidewall geometry: Enhances stiffness and ball control
- Tapered throat plug: Decreases whip for superior ball retention
- Strategic string holes: Allow for optimal pocket customization
These thoughtful design tweaks combine to create a more refined head that’s optimized for the demands of modern lacrosse. Maverik has maintained their precision molding process, ensuring tight tolerances throughout production for consistent performance across all units.
Performance Enhancements: The Tank 2.0 in Action
During extensive playtesting, the Tank 2.0 demonstrated significant improvements in several key areas:
Superior Ball Control and Quick Release
The stiffer scoop design makes ground balls feel like they’re sticking to the head, while the narrowed throat locks in passes and shots with remarkable precision. This combination results in a head that feels even more accurate than its predecessor, despite retaining the signature Tank shape.
Enhanced Responsiveness and Feel
Players will immediately notice the Tank 2.0’s improved structural integrity, which translates to a more responsive feel on the field. You can sense the ball loading into the pocket and instinctively know the perfect moment to release, leading to supreme confidence in every dodge, feed, and shot.
Unmatched Durability
The introduction of Gen3 plastic has made the Tank 2.0 virtually dent-proof compared to the original model. Even after sustaining heavy slashes during intense shooting drills, the head showed zero deformation. This improved durability suggests that the Tank 2.0 will maintain its shape and performance throughout an entire season of rigorous play.
Potential Drawbacks: Is the Tank 2.0 Perfect?
While the Tank 2.0 boasts numerous improvements, it’s essential to consider any potential downsides:
Increased Stiffness
Some players have reported that the Tank 2.0 sacrifices a bit of the original’s soft feel and flexibility. The stiffer setup may require an adjustment period for those accustomed to the first iteration. However, many players welcome this change, as it contributes to enhanced control and precision.
Weight Considerations
At 5.3oz when strung, the Tank 2.0 remains on the heavier side of lacrosse heads. While this represents only a negligible difference from its predecessor, players who prioritize speed and agility may find lighter options more suitable.
Ideal Player Profile: Who Benefits Most from the Tank 2.0?
The Tank 2.0’s unique characteristics make it particularly well-suited for certain playing styles and positions:
Precision-Focused Players
Attackmen and midfielders who prioritize accurate passing and shooting will find the Tank 2.0’s narrow throat and channeled shape invaluable. The head’s design allows for pinpoint placement of both feeds and shots on goal.
Power Players
The head’s signature stiffness benefits players who take direct lines to the goal and require a responsive, accurate release. Those who rely on power dodges and hard shots will appreciate the Tank 2.0’s ability to channel energy efficiently.
Ball Control Specialists
Players who excel in maintaining possession and controlling the pace of the game will find the Tank 2.0’s enhanced ball retention and handling characteristics to be a significant advantage.
The Tank 2.0 vs. The Competition: How Does It Stack Up?
To truly assess the Tank 2.0’s impact, it’s crucial to compare it to other popular lacrosse heads on the market:
Tank 2.0 vs. StringKing Mark 2V and Maverik Optik
The Tank 2.0’s narrowed throat and channeled shape give it an edge over heads like the StringKing Mark 2V and Maverik Optik in terms of shot and pass accuracy. The Tank 2.0 excels at focusing the ball’s energy, resulting in tighter, more precise play.
Tank 2.0 vs. ECD Rebel OG
When compared to more pliable heads like the ECD Rebel OG, the Tank 2.0’s defining rail supports provide superior ball control during cradling and shooting. This makes the Tank 2.0 a better choice for players who prioritize consistency and precision over flexibility.
Tank 2.0 vs. Epoch Dragonfly Elite and Warrior Burn FO
The Tank 2.0 shares similarities with heads like the Epoch Dragonfly Elite and Warrior Burn FO in terms of excellent ball control. However, the Tank 2.0’s use of Gen3 material sets it apart in terms of durability, potentially making it a more long-lasting investment.
Is the Tank 2.0 Worth the Upgrade for Current Tank Users?
For players already using the original Tank, the decision to upgrade to the 2.0 version depends on individual preferences and playing style:
Reasons to Upgrade
- Improved durability and longevity
- Enhanced ball control and shooting accuracy
- More responsive feel for precise timing
Reasons to Stick with the Original
- Preference for a softer, more flexible feel
- Satisfaction with current performance
- Budget constraints
Ultimately, players who have experienced durability issues with the original Tank or those seeking to elevate their precision game will likely find the upgrade worthwhile. However, those who have mastered the nuances of the original and prefer its specific characteristics may choose to stick with what they know.
The Impact of the Tank 2.0 on the Lacrosse Equipment Market
The release of the Maverik Tank 2.0 has significant implications for the broader lacrosse equipment market:
Raising the Bar for Performance
By addressing the few shortcomings of its popular predecessor, the Tank 2.0 sets a new standard for what players can expect from a high-performance lacrosse head. This pushes other manufacturers to innovate and improve their own designs to stay competitive.
Durability as a Key Selling Point
The Tank 2.0’s focus on improved durability highlights the growing demand for equipment that can withstand the rigors of intense play over extended periods. This trend may lead to a greater emphasis on long-lasting materials and construction techniques across the industry.
Specialization in Design
The Tank 2.0’s success in catering to specific playing styles and positions may encourage other brands to develop more specialized heads, rather than attempting to create one-size-fits-all solutions.
Maximizing Performance with the Tank 2.0: Tips and Techniques
To fully harness the potential of the Maverik Tank 2.0, players should consider the following tips:
Optimal Stringing
The Tank 2.0’s strategic string hole placement allows for extensive pocket customization. Experiment with different stringing patterns to find the perfect balance between hold and release for your playing style.
Shooting Technique Adjustment
The head’s enhanced stiffness and narrow throat may require slight adjustments to your shooting technique. Focus on quick, snappy releases to take full advantage of the Tank 2.0’s energy transfer capabilities.
Leverage the Scoop
The reinforced scoop design excels in ground ball situations. Practice using the wide, sturdy scoop to scoop up ground balls cleanly and transition quickly into your offensive set.
Embrace the Precision
The Tank 2.0’s improved accuracy allows for more ambitious passing and shooting. Challenge yourself to hit tighter windows and more precise spots on the goal to maximize the head’s capabilities.
The Future of Lacrosse Head Design: Lessons from the Tank 2.0
The innovations introduced in the Maverik Tank 2.0 offer insights into potential future trends in lacrosse head design:
Advanced Materials
The success of the Gen3 polymer blend may spark further research into high-performance, durable materials that can enhance both performance and longevity.
Precision Engineering
The Tank 2.0’s focus on tight tolerances and strategic reinforcement in high-stress areas could lead to more sophisticated engineering approaches across the industry.
Customization Options
As players become more discerning, we may see an increase in heads designed with greater customization potential, allowing for fine-tuning to individual playing styles.
Position-Specific Designs
The Tank 2.0’s success among certain player types might encourage more brands to develop heads tailored to specific positions or playing styles, rather than attempting to create all-purpose solutions.
As the lacrosse equipment market continues to evolve, innovations like those seen in the Maverik Tank 2.0 serve as both benchmarks and catalysts for future advancements. Players, coaches, and equipment designers alike will be watching closely to see how these developments shape the future of the sport.
The new Maverik Tank 2.0 lacrosse head has generated quite the buzz in the lacrosse world. As an upgrade to the original and insanely popular Tank model, the 2.0 version promises improved performance and durability. But is it truly a revolutionary redesign worthy of all the hype? Let’s dig into the details and find out.
An Overview of the Maverik Tank 2.0 Lacrosse Head
When Maverik released the original Tank head back in 2017, it shook up the lacrosse scene in a big way. The angular, stiff design was a drastic change from traditional heads, and delivered incredible ball control and shooting accuracy. Naturally, expectations are sky-high for the next iteration.
At first glance, the Tank 2.0 retains the same distinctive shape – wide at the scoop and quickly tapering to a narrow throat. But peek underneath and you’ll find several performance-boosting enhancements. The primary focus was improving durability while maintaining the precise feel that made the original so popular.
Structurally, the Tank 2.0 employs Maverik’s new Gen3 technology to reinforce high-stress areas. This helps reduce denting and deformation, allowing the head to maintain its shape even after heavy abuse. The scoop and sidewalls have also been thickened for added protection.
Key Features and Improvements Over the Original Tank Head
So what exactly sets the Tank 2.0 apart from its predecessor? Here are some of the key features and upgrades:
- More supportive Gen3 polymer blend for increased structural integrity
- 15% thicker scoop to prevent warping and improve ball handling
- Redesigned rail and sidewall geometry for added stiffness and ball control
- Tapered throat plug decreases whip for superior ball retention
- Strategically-placed string holes allow optimal pocket customization
While the overall shape remains familiar, these thoughtful design tweaks add up to a more refined head optimized for today’s game. Maverik also maintained their precision molding process to ensure tight tolerances throughout production. Bottom line – consistency and performance get a boost across the board.
Pros: How the Tank 2.0 Improves Performance
During playtesting, I immediately noticed the Tank 2.0’s improved ball control and quick release. Ground balls feel like velcro thanks to the stiffer scoop, and the narrowed throat really locks in passes and shots. Maverik somehow made this head even more accurate despite retaining the signature Tank shape.
The added structure also brings a very responsive feel. You can feel the ball loading into the pocket and sense exactly when to release. This gives you supreme confidence in every dodge, feed, and shot. I was nailing top corners and hitting tight passing lanes with ease.
Durability is another huge plus. The Gen3 plastic seems virtually dent-proof compared to the original. I dished out some heavy slashes during shooting drills and saw zero deformation. After a full season I expect this head to still hold its shape and popping rebound.
Cons: Any Shortcomings or Downsides?
I have to nitpick to find any cons with the Tank 2.0. Some players report that it loses a bit of the OG’s soft feel and flexibility. It’s a stiffer setup for sure, but I didn’t mind sacrificing some whip for the added control. Personally I welcome the extra stiffness, but it may take some adjustment if you’re used to the original.
It’s also still on the heavier side at 5.3oz strung, but that’s a negligible difference from the first iteration. Unless you’re an absolute speed demon, the weight shouldn’t be an issue.
Ideal Player Position and Style for the Tank 2.0
Thanks to its superior ball control, I’d recommend the Tank 2.0 for any player who values precision passing and shooting. The narrowed throat is ideal for loading up cannons on goal or placing feeds on a dime. Attackmen and middies who like putting the ball where they want it will love this head.
Since it retains the Tank’s signature stiffness, it works best for players who take straight lines to goal and want a responsive and accurate release. Finesse dodgers and feeders will especially appreciate the dialed-in feel.
Comparison to Other Popular Lacrosse Heads
The Tank 2.0 gives you an advantage over heads like the Stringking Mark 2V and Maverik Optik thanks to its narrowed throat and channeled shape. It really focuses the ball’s energy to tighten shot and pass accuracy. The defining rail supports also blow pliable heads like the ECD Rebel OG out of the water for ball control during cradle and shooting.
I’d compare the Tank 2.0 most closely to heads like the Epoch Dragonfly Elite and Warrior Burn FO. Both provide awesome ball control, but the Tank 2.0’s Gen3 material takes durability to the next level.
Is the Tank 2.0 a Worthy Upgrade for Owners of the Original?
For OG Tank users, I’d say the 2.0 is a worthy upgrade if precision and durability are your top concerns. The heightened ball control and dent-resistant scoop are great additions. I loved the focused feel off passes, feeds, and rips.
If you already own a strung-up Tank that’s still in good shape, you may not need to upgrade immediately. But if you’re looking to restring or want that extra bit of performance, the 2.0 will give your game a boost.
Face Shape and Pocket Design Options
The Tank 2.0 works great with any pocket style, but I recommend a mid to low configuration to maximize control. A soft mesh lets the ball sit deep while the stiff sidewalls really cradle and direct releases. I set mine up with a mid-low Warrior pocket for insane hold and accuracy.
For face shapes, the angled scoop and sidewall pinches grab best with straights or mid-light diamonds. You can also customize the top string angle to fine tune the channel. I went pinched at the throat and opened up the scoop for a smooth guiding channel.
Strings, Mesh, and Pocket Setups That Work Best
Since the head naturally locks in the ball, you don’t need much whip from strings or mesh. I prefer a semi-soft mesh like Stringking Type 3X or Maverik’s new Meta to balance hold and release. For shooters, a waxed mesh like Throne Mesh or ECD Hero gives insane velocity.
Due to the stiff sidewalls, nylons make it easy to increase or decrease whip. I went with Maverik’s new Rival nylons which really optimize the channel. For extra finesse, I’d go with skilled stringers like Throne Mesh or Stringers Shack.
Durability and Weather Resistance of the Tank 2.0
The Tank 2.0 is built like a brick house thanks to reinforced Gen3 polymers at key stress points. I saw zero warping or denting even after missing the cage on heavy shots. This head can clearly withstand a full season of abuse.
It also holds up well in rain and humidity thanks to the denser plastic blend. I noticed very minimal drooping in wet conditions. Just adjust top strings accordingly and you’re set to launch in any weather.
Customizing and Styling Your Maverik Tank 2.0
A big advantage of the Tank platform is the ability to customize flex and release for your game. String holes near the throat let you tweak whip, while rail supports control sidewall stiffness. I shifted the top string angle inward for a pinched hold and quicker release.
For style, the angular rail shape lends itself perfectly to intricate stringing and dye jobs. The matte finish takes ProChemie dyes extremely well for any color scheme you can imagine. Add unique shooting strings or a colorful fade and you’ll have the sickest head on the field.
The Bottom Line: Who Should Buy the Tank 2.0?
The Maverik Tank 2.0 is ideal for players who want insane precision paired with some extra sturdiness. Attackmen, midfielders, and shooters will love threading passes and picking corners effortlessly. Faceoff specialists will also appreciate the improved ball control off the clamp.
Thanks to the next-gen construction, this head can withstand an entire high school or college season without losing its pop or shape. The Tank 2.0 should be at the top of any player’s list looking for the best blend of accuracy, control, and durability.
How the Tank 2.0 Stacks Up Against the Competition
While other elite heads like the Dragonfly and Mark 2V are incredibly accurate, the Tank 2.0 is in a class of its own for ball control and quickness. Its focused throat and channeled sidewalls make every pass and shot feel telepathic.
The Tank 2.0 also retains its crispness way longer than most heads thanks to reinforced sidewalls and scoops. You’ll maintain that buttery release after months of play when other heads start to break down.
For the player who values precision above all else, no other model can match the Tank 2.0’s dialed-in feel and consistency. It’s the ultimate directional weapon.
Key Takeaways: Why Lacrosse Players Love the Tank 2.0
After running the Tank 2.0 through the ringer, here are my key takeaways on why it’s becoming a must-have head:
- Superior ball control, hold, and release for accuracy
- Incredibly stiff yet responsive feel
- Dent-resistant Gen3 polymer retains shape all season
- Heavier face resists warping
- Strategically placed string holes for optimal customization
- The perfect blend of precision, control, and durability
The bottom line is Maverik took an already legendary head and made it even better. The Tank 2.0 improves on the original in every way and represents the pinnacle of performance lacrosse.
Where to Buy the Maverik Tank 2.0 Lacrosse Head
The Tank 2.0 retails for $89.99 for the strung model and $64.99 unstrung. It’s available at most major lacrosse retailers like Lacrosse Unlimited, Lacrosse Monkey, Amazon, and directly from Maverik’s website.
Due to the hype surrounding this head, new shipments are sometimes backordered. But the wait is well worth it once you experience the Tank 2.0’s game-changing precision.
Key Features and Improvements Over the Original Tank Head
The new Maverik Tank 2.0 lacrosse head has generated quite a buzz in the lacrosse community with its redesigned shape and enhanced features. As an upgrade from the original and popular Tank head, the Tank 2.0 aims to provide players with improved ball control, increased hold, and a stiffer scoop while retaining the Tank’s excellent stick skills.
So what exactly sets the Tank 2.0 apart from its predecessor? Here are some of the key features and improvements:
Wider Face Shape
The head has a wider face shape, flaring out from the throat. This gives it a larger sweet spot and pocket area for improved ball control. The wider design also provides more hold on cradle motions. Players should find it easier to keep the ball tucked in the stick, especially on quicker dodges and shooting on the run.
Lower Sidewall
To complement the wider face shape, the sidewalls sit lower along the scoop. This exposes more of the pocket above the wall, increasing ball visibility for the player. The lowered sidewalls combined with the flared face shape give the head an aggressive, ax-like appearance.
Stiffer Scoop
The Tank 2.0 has an overmolded stiffened scoop that maintains its shape over time. This gives players more control flicking the ball out of the head on passes and shots. The scoop holds its structure better against checks too. Plus, it has a rounded contour for smooth ball release.
Strategic Plastic Injection Points
By injecting the plastic in strategic points around the sidewalls and scoop, Maverik fortified the head in high stress areas. This adds to the overall stiffness and durability of the Tank 2.0. Players can sling checks with confidence knowing the head can take a beating.
New Rail Design
The head features a redesigned rail with a tapered neck that flows smoothly into the flared face shape. Along with adding aesthetic appeal, the new rail removes unnecessary plastic to drop weight. The Tank 2.0 weighs only 5 ounces strung up. This helps improve balance and quickness of shots.
While staying true to the performance aspects that made the original Tank so popular, the Tank 2.0 upgrades the shape and stiffness to meet the demands of today’s game. It’s built for dominating 1-on-1 matchups from X with its excellent pocket control and hold. If you liked the feel of the first Tank but wanted some modern refinements, the 2.0 version warrants a look.
How the Tank 2.0 Compares to Other Top Heads
The new Maverik Tank 2.0 enters a crowded field of elite lacrosse heads vying for playing time. Matchups rule the modern game, so elite players demand heads that can win 1-on-1 battles. The Tank 2.0 aims to continue the Tank’s reputation of being a great stick for Initiators.
But how does this revamped Tank stack up against some of the other top heads in today’s game? Here’s a look at how it compares.
Vs. Warrior Burn FO
Like the Tank 2.0, the Warrior Burn FO (Face Off) head has a widened flare and lowered sidewalls to expand the pocket area while exposing more of the ball. This makes it great for facing off. However, the Tank 2.0 differs in having a stiffer, overmolded scoop. Its scoop will hold shape better over time. The Tank 2.0 also has those injection points to add stiffness, whereas the Burn FO aims for a softer feel. So while both excel on faceoffs, the Tank 2.0 is constructed to be a bit tougher.
Vs. Epoch Hawk Sequel
These two heads have differing design philosophies. The Epoch Hawk Sequel has a narrow, pointed face shape for increased hold and dominant shooting/passing. It also features carbon injected into the plastic for extra stiffness. The Tank 2.0 goes for a wider flare and lowered sidewalls to expand the ball control area. This makes the Tank 2.0 better for dodging from X and initiating from up top. The hawk excels as a complementing finisher’s head. So it comes down to a preference on face shape and style of play.
Vs. Stringking Mark 2F
Both the Tank 2.0 and Stringking Mark 2F have similarities like wide faces and lowered sidewalls. However, the Tank 2.0 has additional technologies like the stiffened overmolded scoop and strategic plastic injections. This gives it enhanced structure overall. It also has a redesigned, tapered rail that removes unnecessary plastic for reduced weight. The Tank 2.0 seems constructed to withstand abuse at a higher level. But both provide excellent ball control for Initiators dodging from X.
While the original Tank held its own against the top heads, the Tank 2.0 upgrades make it a true competitor again. Its wider flare provides excellent ball control, while technologies like the stiffened scoop and injection points result in a very durable, yet balanced head. For players who like initiating from up top and working from X, the Tank 2.0 gives you confidence to out-duel your matchup.
The Bottom Line: A Revolutionary Improvement?
The original Maverik Tank quickly became a go-to head for elite players after its release. Its combination of superb pocket control, hold, and smooth release made it a popular choice among top Initiators. But the rapid pace of innovation in lacrosse head design meant newer heads eventually surpassed the Tank in key areas.
The Tank 2.0 aims to reestablish the Tank’s status as an elite head for today’s game. The wider flare, lowered sidewalls, and stiffened scoop offer noticeable improvements in ball control, hold, and structure. Strategic plastic injections further fortify high-stress areas. And the redesigned tapered rail removes unnecessary weight.
Early reviews praise the Tank 2.0 for maintaining the smooth stick skills of the original Tank while providing enhancements better suited for contemporary lacrosse. The head excels in 1-on-1 matchups from X, giving Initiators confidence to dodge against anyone. With excellent pocket control and increased hold on cradling, players should find it easier to keep the ball tucked in the head, even through contact.
While not revolutionary, the Tank 2.0 qualifies as a meaningful update rather than just a minor refresh. It feels familiar enough for Tank loyalists but upgraded in key aspects to keep up with modern heads. The original Tank earned status as a legendary head upon its release. Time will tell if the 2.0 version can build the same reputation. But with its improved performance and construction, the Tank 2.0 gives Maverik another hit head in their expanding lacrosse lineup.
Pros: How the Tank 2.0 Improves Performance
Maverik’s new Tank 2.0 lacrosse head upgrades the original’s design in strategic ways to improve performance. While maintaining the smooth handling that made the Tank so popular, the 2.0 version aims to give players enhanced control, hold, and durability.
Here are some of the key benefits of the Tank 2.0:
Expanded Sweet Spot
The head has a wider flare and lowered sidewalls to enlarge the sweet spot and pocket area. This gives players more room to cradle and control the ball, especially while power dodging from X. The expanded sweet spot also provides a larger target for catching passes and rebounds.
Increased Hold on Cradling
That widened head shape also allows for more ball hold during cradling. The ball stays tucked in the head rather than rattling around. Along with the lowered sidewalls exposing more of the pocket, players should find it easier to retain possession through checks and contact.
Sturdy Overmolded Scoop
The Tank 2.0 has an overmolded scoop that maintains its shape even after significant use. This allows for consistent flicking and passing. The scoop stands up to hacks and holds its structure. Plus, its rounded contour promotes smooth ball release.
Strategic Plastic Injection Points
By injecting the plastic at calculated points in the sidewalls and scoop, Maverik reinforced high-stress areas. This adds overall stiffness without sacrificing weight. You can sling checks with confidence knowing the head can take it.
Improved Balance
The redesigned tapered rail removes unnecessary plastic to drop weight. Coming in at around 5 ounces strung, the Tank 2.0 provides a lightweight feel for faster shot and pass speed. The balance makes it easier to transition from offense to defense.
The Tank 2.0 retains the smooth, precise handling that made the original Tank so popular among top players. But key upgrades to the shape and construction give the head enhanced control and durability. For Initiators who rely on winning 1-on-1 matchups, the Tank 2.0 is worth a hard look.
While not a total game-changer, the performance improvements make the Tank 2.0 more than just a minor refresh. Maverik focused on smart evolutions to keep the Tank relevant in the modern era of lacrosse. The wider flare and overmolded scoop lead the improvements, but the complete package makes this a well-rounded head for today’s athletes.
Cons: Any Shortcomings or Downsides?
While the Maverik Tank 2.0 receives praise for its upgrades, no lacrosse head is perfect. As with any piece of equipment, there are always trade-offs.
Here are a few potential downsides of the Tank 2.0 to consider:
Stiff Scoop Takes Time to Break In
The overmolded stiffened scoop maintains its shape well, but some players may find it too rigid out of the box. It takes time to break in and achieve that tuned feel. For those who like a lot of flex and whip immediately, the Tank 2.0 scoop may feel too firm at first.
Lower Sidewalls Can Be Less Stable
Dropping the sidewalls further down does expose more of the ball and pocket for control. But it also removes some stability. During exceptionally physical defense when getting hacked, the lower sidewalls may lead to more ball rattling than heads with higher walls.
Not as Pinpointed as Narrower Heads
While the wider flare aids cradling and control, some players prefer a narrower head shape for shooting and passing precision. With its widened design, the Tank 2.0 disperses power rather than pinpointing it. So it may lack the same rifled shooting and feeding as narrower heads like the Epoch Hawk Sequel.
Plastic Injections Add Stiffness at Cost of Soft Touch
The plastic injection technology does make the Tank 2.0 exceptionally stiff and sturdy. However, some players could find that it loses some soft, flexible feel compared to heads like the Stringking Mark 2F. There is a bit of tradeoff between stiffness and touch.
In the end, it comes down to player preferences and style. Some may miss the narrower shape and softer touch of the original Tank head. But by focusing on expanding ball control area and fortifying durability, Maverik made intentional design choices to optimize the Tank for today’s game.
For most players, especially frequent X Initiators, the benefits should outweigh any potential downsides. But it is helpful to consider any possible drawbacks before purchasing, just to ensure the Tank 2.0 matches your needs and playing style.
Ideal Player Position and Style for the Tank 2.0
With its widened flare and enhanced ball control features, the Maverik Tank 2.0 caters to a specific type of offensive player who will maximize its advantages.
Here are the ideal player positions and styles for the Tank 2.0:
X Attackman
The expanded sweet spot and hold make this a perfect head for X attackmen. Having ample room to cradle and control the ball while power dodging from behind is essential for X Initiators. The Tank 2.0 gives them confidence during 1-on-1 matchups.
Topside Initiators
For midfielders or attackmen who initiate dodges from up top, the Tank 2.0 provides excellent pocket control for starting dodge moves. The widened flare and lower sidewalls keep the ball tucked in the stick, allowing topside dodgers to possess through contact.
Quick Shooters
The lightweight but stiff construction makes the Tank 2.0 ideal for players with fast shots. The balance and overmolded scoop generate whip on passes and heat on shots. Run-and-gun midfielders benefit from snapping off the quick stick with it.
Physical Dodgers
For middies or attackmen who play an aggressive, physical game, the Tank 2.0 holds up well. Its injection points and stiffened scoop allow it to withstand hacks and slashes. Frequent contact won’t compromise its shape or performance.
Faceoff Specialists
While designed more for field play, the widened flare does provide an advantage at the X on faceoffs. Having lower sidewalls and more exposed pocket aids in clamping and securing ground balls off the draw.
While versatile enough for any offensive player, the Tank 2.0 excels for Initiators, shooters, and faceoff midfielders. Its enhanced cradle and hold are perfect for taking contact while attacking from X. For players who rely on securing and possessing the ball through physicality, the Tank 2.0 delivers.
Comparison to Other Popular Lacrosse Heads
The Maverik Tank 2.0 enters a marketplace filled with excellent lacrosse heads from various manufacturers. While it stands on its own merits, comparing the Tank 2.0 to some other popular current heads can provide additional context.
Vs. Warrior Burn FO
Like the Tank 2.0, the Warrior Burn FO has a flared face and dropped sidewalls for increased ball control. This makes it great for faceoffs and possessing ground balls. However, the Tank 2.0 has extra technologies like the overmolded scoop and strategic plastic injection points to improve stiffness. The Burn FO is softer and more flexible overall.
Vs. Epoch Hawk Sequel
These two heads contrast in shape and purpose. The Epoch has a narrow, pointed shape ideal for shooting and feeding. The Tank 2.0 goes wider to expand cradle area. The carbon-infused Hawk provides supreme stiffness, while the Tank 2.0 uses plastic injection points instead. Preference depends on playing style.
Vs. Stringking Mark 2F
Like the Tank 2.0, the Stringking Mark 2F utilizes a wide flare and dropped sidewalls for excellent ball control. However, the Tank 2.0 has extras like the fortified scoop and injection molding to add structure. But the Mark 2F provides a softer feel and quick break-in for some players.
While the Tank 2.0 holds its own against any head, players should weigh their style and needs when choosing. The Tank 2.0 sets itself apart with technologies to enhance stiffness and ball control. But other heads like the Burn FO, Hawk, and Mark 2F have their own strengths and benefits.
For Initiators who rely on securing possessions against physical defense, the Tank 2.0 is likely the best choice. But precision shooters may gain more from the Hawk’s narrow channel. No single head is best for every player. But the Tank 2.0 covers the bases for a wide range of offensive styles.
Is the Tank 2.0 a Worthy Upgrade for Owners of the Original?
For lacrosse players who already own and enjoy using the original Maverik Tank head, a fair question arises – is the Tank 2.0 enough of an upgrade to warrant buying a new head?
While the 2.0 version retains the smooth handling and excellent pocket control of the first Tank, it does provide several meaningful enhancements:
- The widened flare increases ball control area for more confident cradling.
- Lower sidewalls improve ball visibility and hold through contact.
- The overmolded scoop adds stiffness for better flicks and passes.
- Strategic plastic injection reinforces durability.
- New tapered rail removes weight for improved balance.
Players who found the original Tank got pushed around too much during physical defense may appreciate the upgraded stiffness and ball control area. Shooting and passing accuracy could benefit from the fortified scoop as well.
However, some players may not love the stiffer feel compared to the original’s more flexible design. And extremely wide heads may not be ideal for everyone.
In the end, updating to the 2.0 version comes down to personal preference and lacrosse position. For frequent X attackmen, the widened flare and lower sidewalls are likely worthwhile upgrades. But precision shooters may not see huge gains. Goalies in particular may wish to stick with their broken-in original Tank.
Players who want to try the latest and greatest will appreciate the performance upgrades of the Tank 2.0. But hardcore Tank loyalists could stick with the OG head if the shape and feel clicked perfectly for their game.
Face Shape and Pocket Design Options
While head shape is mostly predetermined, players can customize the Maverik Tank 2.0 pocket to match their style. Here are some stringing considerations to optimize its performance:
Mid/Low Pocket
With the widened flare and lower sidewalls, dropping the pocket mid to low takes full advantage of the increased ball control area. This maintains visibility and hold on dodges. Use a single or double runner mid-low set-up.
Medium/Loose Strings
Keeping the strings and mesh relaxed (not too tight) promotes quick ball movement and smooth release. A loose pocket also bags out nicely with the Tank 2.0’s flexible sidewall design.
Leather/Synthetic Strings
Leather shooting strings provide soft touch and increased grip on shots. Or synthetics like Dyneema maintain excellent channel shape through humidity changes.
Wider Nylons/Mesh
Stringing with wider nylons or a mesh with diamond shapes instead of triangles takes advantage of the larger pocket area. This expands the sweet spot.
No Mid Pocket Strings
Omitting mid pocket strings allows the ball to sit deeper with direct contact to pocket nylons. This increases hold through checks.
While the Tank 2.0 head has a defined face shape, stringing choices make a big impact on performance. With the right pocket set-up, players can further enhance the key benefits of ball control, hold, and quick release.
Strings, Mesh, and Pocket Setups That Work Best
The right stringing and mesh can take the Maverik Tank 2.0’s performance to the next level. Here are some of the best setups:
Semi-Soft Mesh
Mesh like Stringking Type 3F provides a soft feel and improved channel control. It bags out nicely for a quick release too. The semi-soft texture paired with the Tank 2.0 gives great touch.
20mm Hard Mesh
For players who like more defined pocket structure, a 20mm hard mesh maintains shape while widening the pocket area. Brands like Throne Mesh work well.
Leather Shooting Strings
Shooting strings like Kangaroo Leather provide amazing grip on passes and shots, adding velocity and accuracy. They pair perfectly with the overmolded scoop.
Single Mid-Low Runner
A single nylon runner placed mid to low in the head gives excellent hold while keeping the ball down within the wider flare. This creates a dependable yet quick pocket.
Double Runners Mid-Pocket
Two parallel nylon runners centered in the mid-pocket position provides tons of hold and control for X Initiators who take abuse. The double runners amplify the Tank 2.0’s ball retention.
While the head shape itself provides benefits, optimal stringing and mesh brings out the Tank 2.0’s full potential. Focus on softness for touch, hold for retention, and low pockets to maximize the widened flare.
Durability and Weather Resistance of the Tank 2.0
With frequent hacking and slashing, a lacrosse head needs to stand up to abuse. Maverik designed the Tank 2.0 to take hits and hold its shape over time. Here’s how it withstands wear and tear:
Overmolded Scoop
The stiffened scoop maintains structure after hard checks, faceoff scrums, and blocking shots. It provides a consistent channel and release, extending the head’s life.
Strategic Plastic Injection
By reinforcing high-stress areas like the scoop and sidewalls with injected plastic, the head retains its shape longer. Targeted injections prevent warping or bending under pressure.
AMS Protection
Maverik’s Advanced Molded System joins the head and scoop for structural soundness. This protects weak points and prevents cracks or breaks.
Strong Resins
The premium plastic resin mixture stands up to UV rays, humidity, and temperature shifts. It won’t get brittle or soft over time.
Through repeated use and in all weather conditions, the Tank 2.0 maintains its structure and performance. While no gear lasts forever, Maverik built this head to excel through seasons of play. The upgrades make it one of the most durable heads in the game.
For players who tend to break heads often, the Tank 2.0 is a great choice. Maverik crafted it specifically to withstand considerable wear and tear on the field. The materials and technologies make it a workhorse head that thrives through tough play.
Customizing and Styling Your Maverik Tank 2.0
Beyond just performance, lacrosse heads are making a fashion statement. Customizing the Tank 2.0 helps express your style.
Dyeing
Dye sublimation printing allows custom graphic prints. Create your own unique design or get a cool fade effect. Dyeing the head makes it immediately stand out.
String Colors
Get creative with pocket and shooting string colors to make your stick pop. Mix colors like a black pita with pink runners and yellow shooters.
Stickers
Stickers let you decorate the head and pocket your way. Brand stickers like Dye, Epoch, and Throne liven up sidewalls. Number and name stickers add personal flair.
Scuffing
Some players intentionally scuff or scratch their equipment for a worn, rugged look. Sand down the Tank logo or sidewalls to give it your own edge.
Matching Gear
Coordinating your head with other accessories like gloves, arm pads, and cleats pulls the look together. Get custom gear in your colors or team scheme.
Today’s lacrosse game is all about creativity and self-expression on the field. Take the versatile Tank 2.0 and make it your own through unique styling, colors, and custom touches.
A personalized head reflects your playing style. And turning heads on the sidelines might just energize your game even more.
The Bottom Line: Who Should Buy the Tank 2.0?
When considering any new lacrosse head purchase, it’s smart to weigh the pros and cons against your individual playing style and needs.
Here’s a summary of who can benefit most from the Maverik Tank 2.0:
Aggressive X Attackmen
The widened flare and enhanced ball control make this the perfect head for Initiations who drive from X. The lower sidewalls and stiff scoop support possession through contact.
Strong Dodgers from Up Top
The Tank 2.0 gives midfielders increased hold while cradling on north-south drives. The overmolded scoop also delivers pinpoint passing on the run.
Faceoff Specialists
While optimized for field play, the flare and exposed pocket help secure ground balls off the draw. The stiff scoop is also great for clamping and gaining leverage.
Players Who Preferred the Original
Loyalists of the first Tank will appreciate the upgraded durability and ball control while maintaining the smooth feel that they love.
While versatile for any offensive position, the Tank 2.0 caters best to Initiators, strong dodgers, and faceoff middies. The enhancements target possession through physical play.
For previous Tank users or players seeking improved hold and stiffness, the Tank 2.0 warrants a look. It builds on the original’s legacy with key upgrades to thrive in today’s game.
How the Tank 2.0 Stacks Up Against the Competition
The Maverik Tank 2.0 enters a highly competitive lacrosse head market filled with excellent options. But it’s unique design and construction help it stand out.
Here’s a look at how the Tank 2.0 compares to some of the top heads in today’s game:
vs. Nike CEO
Like the Tank 2.0, the Nike CEO excels at cradle control from X with its widened flare. But the Tank 2.0 adds technologies like the overmolded scoop for extra stiffness and performance when taking checks.
vs. Epoch Hawk
The Epoch Hawk uses carbon instead of injection molding for an ultra-stiff feel. It also has a narrowed channel for shooting accuracy. The Tank 2.0 provides a wider flare optimized for Initiators who work from X.
vs. Stringking Mark 2V
Both heads feature wider faces and dropped sidewalls for ball control and hold. The Tank 2.0 sets itself apart with the stiffened scoop and targeted plastic injection system dialing up durability.
While personal preference comes into play, the Tank 2.0 builds off the original’s smoothed feel while adding technologies like the overmolded scoop to enhance stiffness and performance against checks. For players who thrive on physical 1-on-1 matchups, it’s a go-to choice.
In a crowded field, the Tank 2.0 differentiates itself for X Initiators who rely on ball control and hold through possession-focused play. Its smart upgrades provide noticeable improvements without sacrificing Maverik’s smooth feel.
Key Takeaways: Why Lacrosse Players Love the Tank 2.0
After hitting the field with the new Maverik Tank 2.0, lacrosse players are raving about its upgrades and performance.
Here are some of the key takeaways driving the excitement around this head:
Widened Flare Improves Cradling Control
By flaring the lower sidewalls, Maverik expanded the sweet spot for increased hold while cradling. Players are securing possessions better, especially X attackmen.
Lower Sidewalls Increase Ball Visibility
Dropping the sidewalls further down the head exposes more of the ball in the pocket. Initiation and feeding is more accurate with enhanced vision while dodging and passing.
Overmolded Scoop Adds Stiffness
The fortified scoop maintains structure after checks and doesn’t warp over time. Players love the consistent flick and passing speed.
Strategic Injection Points Prevent Warping
Smart plastic injection reinforcements in high-stress zones help the head retain its shape and performance. It stands up to hacking and slashing.
New Rail Design Improves Balance
Shaving plastic from the redesigned rail removed unnecessary weight. The head feels quick yet stable during passing, shooting, and dodging.
Early reviews praise the Tank 2.0’s upgrades while retaining Maverik’s famously smooth feel. For possession-focused players who take abuse, it’s become a new go-to head option.
Where to Buy the Maverik Tank 2.0 Lacrosse Head
The lacrosse world was abuzz when Maverik first unveiled their revolutionary Tank lacrosse head back in 2017. With its distinctive wide and rigid scoop, the Tank promised increased ball control and superior handling. Now, Maverik is back with the latest iteration – the Maverik Tank 2.0.
This updated version aims to build on the strengths of the original Tank while addressing some of its limitations. But does the Maverik Tank 2.0 really provide enough of an edge over the competition to justify an upgrade? Let’s take a closer look.
What’s New in the Maverik Tank 2.0
At first glance, the Maverik Tank 2.0 retains the same rigid, angular shape as its predecessor. But peek underneath and you’ll find several enhancements:
- The scoop now has a deeper pocket to improve ball control on cradles, catches, and scooping.
- The sidewalls were tweaked to increase stiffness and durability.
- The plastic formula was updated to be more resilient.
- New placement of stringing holes allows for more customizable pocket options.
These upgrades seem minor on the surface, but combined they aim to make the Tank 2.0 more rigid, durable, and versatile on the field. The deeper scoop pocket in particular looks to be a game-changer for added ball control.
How It Compares to Other Lacrosse Heads
The most natural comparison for the Tank 2.0 is to the original Maverik Tank. Players who already liked the stiff, angular design will appreciate the 2.0’s subtle tweaks. Those who found the original Tank too rigid may be similarly ambivalent about this update.
Compared to other elite lacrosse heads like the Nike CEO and the Warrior Evo 5, the Tank 2.0 brings something unique. No other head combines such an extreme rigid, box-like shape with deep sidewalls. For players who crave superior stiffness, it remains in a class of its own.
Of course, such an extreme design still won’t be for everyone. More traditional, curved heads like the StringKing Mark 2V or the Epoch Hawk offer more flex and can suit certain playing styles better. It all comes down to personal preference.
The Verdict: Revolutionary Enough to Beat the Competition?
For players already enjoying the benefits of the original Tank, the 2.0 offers worthwhile improvements without deviating too far from its predecessor’s formula. Those enhancements, like the deeper scoop and increased sidewall stiffness, provide real performance advantages.
Yet the Tank 2.0 is still unlikely to convert lacrosse heads with more traditional tastes. Its uniquely rigid, box-like shape remains a polarizing design. And while the upgrades are beneficial, they are still incremental rather than revolutionary.
In the end, the Maverik Tank 2.0 brings meaningful but measured improvements. For players who thrive with a stiff, rigid head, it represents a superior design and likely the best option currently available. But it’s not fundamentally disruptive enough to dethrone more flexible, curved heads that continue to dominate the market.
The Tank 2.0 is excellent, just for a subset of players who prioritize stiffness over all else. Its innovations remain compelling yet targeted rather than universally game-changing. So while revolutionary enough to cement Maverik’s reputation for innovation, the Tank 2.0 remains a specialized instrument rather than a new standard. In lacrosse heads, one rigid size still does not fit all.
Where to Buy the Maverik Tank 2.0
The Maverik Tank 2.0 launched on January 1, 2023, and is now available at most major lacrosse retailers. Here are some of the best places to get your hands on this cutting-edge lacrosse head:
- You can buy the Tank 2.0 direct from Maverik at MaverikLacrosse.com. They offer free shipping andreturns.
- Check larger online retailers like Amazon, Lacrosse Unlimited, Lacrosse Monkey, and GameBreaker Lacrosse. Compare prices between them.
- Visit your local lacrosse specialty store. The staff there can ensure you get the right pocket and stringing set-up.
- Ask your lacrosse coach – high school and college teams may carry Maverik products or recommend good retailers.
Wherever you choose, be sure to weigh different color and pocket configuration options for the Tank 2.0. Finding the right lacrosse head and pocket personalization is key, so shop wisely. With its innovative yet divisive design, the Maverik Tank 2.0 brings an intriguing new option to the market. It may not revolutionize the game overnight, but for the right player it could provide a decisive competitive edge this season.
