Which goalie mesh offers superior performance in 2023. How do Stringking 2s and Grizzly compare in key areas. What factors should goalies consider when choosing between these top meshes. Which mesh provides better consistency and ball control. How do weather resistance and durability stack up between Stringking 2s and Grizzly.
The Rise of Stringking 2s: A Game-Changer in Goalie Mesh
The Stringking 2s goalie mesh has revolutionized the lacrosse world since its introduction in 2018. This innovative product quickly gained traction among goalies at all levels, from youth leagues to professional ranks. Why has it become so popular?
The 2s mesh boasts a unique design featuring an intricate diamond pattern that “grabs” the ball on contact. This proprietary blend of materials allows goalies to maintain superior control over shots, making difficult saves appear effortless. The mesh’s ability to hold onto shots rather than allowing rebounds has made it a favorite among players and coaches alike.
Top professionals like Trevor Baptiste and Adam Ghitelman have adopted the 2s mesh in Major League Lacrosse games. Additionally, numerous college programs, including perennial NCAA contenders such as Duke, Denver, and Loyola, have made the switch to this groundbreaking mesh.
Key Factors Contributing to Stringking 2s Popularity
- Superior grip due to the diamond pattern and proprietary materials
- Consistent performance and shape retention over time
- Customization options with different diamond sizes and stringing choices
By addressing common issues faced by goalies using traditional meshes, such as frequent restringing and balls squeezing through the diamonds, Stringking has established the 2s as a go-to choice for players between the pipes.
Grizzly Mesh: The Tried-and-True Contender
Grizzly mesh entered the market in 2015, offering a fresh take on traditional goalie mesh. Its monofilament nylon material provides structure and stability, even after hundreds of shots. The varying diamond sizes enhance ball control, while its weatherproof construction withstands challenging conditions that can impact other meshes.
Endorsed by standout goalies like Jack Kelly and Christian Knight, Grizzly quickly became a top choice for players seeking reliability and performance. But how does it stack up against the newer Stringking 2s?
Grizzly Mesh Highlights
- Durable monofilament nylon construction
- Varying diamond sizes for enhanced ball control
- Weatherproof design for consistent performance in wet conditions
- Strong reputation among professional and collegiate goalies
Head-to-Head Comparison: Stringking 2s vs Grizzly
To determine which goalie mesh reigns supreme in 2023, we need to compare these two top contenders across several key factors. Let’s break down their performance in crucial areas:
Consistency
How do these meshes maintain their shape and performance over time? The Stringking 2s holds its structure better throughout a season of heavy use, giving it an advantage in maintaining peak performance. Grizzly mesh, while still excellent, can lose some of its shape over time, especially in the sidewall strings.
Weather Resistance
Can these meshes perform in challenging weather conditions? Grizzly’s weatherproof design handles wet conditions exceptionally well. However, the Stringking 2s material offers decent water resistance while providing more overall grip in any conditions, giving it a slight edge in this category.
Ball Control
Which mesh provides superior ball control for goalies? Both meshes excel at ball control thanks to their stringing and diamond design. The Stringking 2s gets a slight edge for how well it “grabs” and contains shots on contact, allowing goalies to make saves with greater ease.
Customization
How much can goalies fine-tune these meshes to their preferences? Both Stringking 2s and Grizzly offer variable diamond sizes, allowing goalies to adjust pocket and channel size. Grizzly provides more overall stringing holes, but the 2s utilizes its limited holes effectively, resulting in a tie in this category.
Durability
Which mesh stands up better to the rigors of regular play? The monofilament nylon used in Grizzly mesh is renowned for its longevity. However, the newer proprietary materials used in the Stringking 2s have proven nearly as durable over thousands of shots, making this category a close call.
Feel
How do these meshes feel during play? This factor largely comes down to personal preference. Some goalies prefer the traditional feel and rebound of Grizzly mesh, while others favor the tackier feel and increased control of the Stringking 2s.
Performance Factors: What Sets These Meshes Apart?
When evaluating goalie mesh performance, several key factors come into play. Understanding these can help players make an informed decision between the Stringking 2s and Grizzly mesh.
Grip and Ball Retention
How well does the mesh hold onto the ball during saves? The Stringking 2s excels in this area due to its unique diamond pattern and proprietary materials. The mesh “grabs” the ball on contact, reducing the likelihood of rebounds and making difficult saves easier to control.
Grizzly mesh also performs well in this aspect, with its varying diamond sizes contributing to solid ball control. However, the Stringking 2s has a slight edge in overall grip and ball retention.
Consistency in Different Weather Conditions
How do these meshes perform in varying weather? Grizzly mesh is known for its weatherproof construction, maintaining consistent performance in wet and humid conditions. The Stringking 2s, while not marketed specifically as weatherproof, offers good water resistance and maintains its grip in various conditions.
For players frequently facing wet weather, Grizzly might have a slight advantage. However, the Stringking 2s performs admirably across a range of conditions, making it a versatile choice.
Longevity and Maintenance
How long do these meshes maintain their performance, and what maintenance do they require? Both the Stringking 2s and Grizzly mesh are known for their durability. The monofilament nylon of Grizzly mesh has a proven track record of longevity, while the newer materials of the Stringking 2s have demonstrated comparable durability in recent years.
In terms of maintenance, both meshes require minimal upkeep. Regular cleaning and proper storage can help extend the life of either mesh. The Stringking 2s may have a slight advantage in maintaining its shape over time, potentially requiring less frequent adjustments or restringing.
Stringing Techniques: Maximizing Mesh Performance
The way a goalie mesh is strung can significantly impact its performance. Both the Stringking 2s and Grizzly mesh offer unique stringing opportunities to maximize their potential.
Stringking 2s Stringing Tips
- Utilize the mesh’s diamond pattern to create a defined channel
- Experiment with different sidewall string tensions to fine-tune pocket depth
- Consider a mid to high pocket for optimal ball control
- Use the limited stringing holes effectively to maintain the mesh’s natural shape
Grizzly Mesh Stringing Techniques
- Take advantage of the numerous stringing holes for precise pocket shaping
- Vary diamond sizes throughout the pocket for customized ball control
- Consider a slightly looser overall string job to maximize the mesh’s natural feel
- Experiment with both high and low pockets to find your ideal setup
Regardless of which mesh you choose, taking the time to string it properly and experiment with different techniques can significantly enhance its performance.
Pro Player Preferences: Who Uses What?
Examining the mesh choices of professional goalies can provide valuable insights into the performance of these top contenders. While personal preference plays a significant role, trends among top players can indicate the strengths of each mesh.
Stringking 2s Users
- Trevor Baptiste (Atlas LC, Premier Lacrosse League)
- Adam Ghitelman (Archers LC, Premier Lacrosse League)
- Jack Concannon (Chaos LC, Premier Lacrosse League)
Grizzly Mesh Users
- Jack Kelly (Redwoods LC, Premier Lacrosse League)
- Christian Knight (Former Cornell University standout)
- Blaze Riorden (Chaos LC, Premier Lacrosse League)
It’s worth noting that many professional goalies experiment with different meshes throughout their careers, and some may switch between the Stringking 2s and Grizzly mesh depending on personal preference or playing conditions.
Making the Choice: Factors to Consider
Choosing between the Stringking 2s and Grizzly mesh ultimately comes down to personal preference and playing style. However, considering the following factors can help goalies make an informed decision:
Playing Style
Do you prefer a mesh that “grabs” the ball on contact, or do you like a more traditional feel? The Stringking 2s offers superior grip, while Grizzly provides a more classic goalie mesh experience.
Weather Conditions
If you frequently play in wet or humid conditions, Grizzly’s weatherproof design might be advantageous. However, the Stringking 2s performs well across various conditions and offers excellent grip even when wet.
Durability Requirements
Both meshes offer excellent durability, but if longevity is your top priority, Grizzly’s proven track record might give it a slight edge.
Stringing Preferences
Consider your stringing style and pocket preferences. Grizzly offers more stringing holes for customization, while the Stringking 2s’s limited holes encourage a specific stringing style that maximizes its performance.
Budget
While both meshes are premium products, there may be slight price differences. Consider your budget and how often you’re willing to replace your mesh when making your decision.
The Verdict: Which Mesh Reigns Supreme in 2023?
After a comprehensive comparison of the Stringking 2s and Grizzly mesh, it’s clear that both products represent the pinnacle of goalie mesh technology. Each offers unique strengths and caters to different player preferences.
The Stringking 2s appears to have a slight edge in 2023 due to its superior ball control, consistency over time, and innovative design. Its ability to “grab” shots on contact and maintain its shape throughout a season gives it an advantage in overall performance.
However, Grizzly mesh remains an excellent option, particularly for goalies who prefer a more traditional feel or frequently play in challenging weather conditions. Its durability and weatherproof design have stood the test of time and continue to impress players at all levels.
Ultimately, the “supreme” mesh will depend on individual goalie preferences, playing style, and specific needs. Both the Stringking 2s and Grizzly mesh have earned their place at the top of the goalie mesh market, and either choice will serve a skilled goalie well.
As materials and designs continue to advance, we may see new contenders enter the battle for the best goalie mesh. For now, goalies can’t go wrong with either the Stringking 2s or Grizzly mesh. The competition between these two top products continues to drive innovation in the field, ultimately benefiting goalies and the sport of lacrosse as a whole.
Introduce the Stringking 2s mesh and its popularity
The Stringking 2s goalie mesh has become one of the most popular goalie head stringing options in recent years. First released in 2018, the 2s mesh was designed from the ground up to deliver maximum ball control and grip for goalies. Made with a proprietary blend of materials, the 2s mesh features an intricate diamond pattern that “grabs” the ball on contact. This allows goalies to make difficult saves look easy by holding onto shots rather than allowing rebounds.
Since its release, the 2s mesh has been adopted by goalies at all levels, from youth leagues up to the professional ranks. Top goalies like Trevor Baptiste and Adam Ghitelman use the 2s mesh in Major League Lacrosse games. Numerous college programs have made the switch as well, including perennial NCAA contenders like Duke, Denver, and Loyola. Even younger players are gravitating towards the 2s mesh to emulate their heroes.
So what makes the 2s mesh so popular among goalies? According to Stringking, it comes down to three key factors:
- Superior grip – The diamond pattern and proprietary materials allow the 2s mesh to “grab” and hold onto shots better than traditional goalie meshes.
- Consistency – Each piece of 2s mesh maintains its shape and performance over time better than other meshes.
- Customization – With different diamond sizes and stringing options, goalies can fine tune the 2s mesh to match their preferences.
By solving some of the issues goalies faced with traditional meshes, like frequent restringing and balls squeezing through the diamonds, Stringking has made the 2s a go-to choice between the pipes. As more goalies adopt the 2s mesh early in their careers, it’s likely to remain popular for years to come.
Stringking 2s vs Grizzly: Which Goalie Mesh Reigns Supreme in 2023?
When it comes to goalie head stringing, two meshes stand at the top of the mountain: the Stringking 2s and Grizzly. Both meshes have strong followings and impressive performance credentials. But which one reigns supreme as we head into the 2023 season?
Released in 2018, the Stringking 2s mesh took the lacrosse world by storm with its unique diamond patterned design and “grabbier” feel. The proprietary blended materials and intricate stringing come together to deliver unmatched control for goalies. Shots stick in the diamonds rather than bouncing out, allowing for easier saves. The consistency in shape and performance over time is also hailed by goalies across all levels.
Grizzly mesh hit the market a few years earlier in 2015, offering a new take on traditional goalie mesh. The monofilament nylon material provides structure and stability over hundreds of shots, while the varying diamond sizes enhance ball control. Grizzly’s weatherproof construction also withstands wet and humid conditions that can impact other meshes. With endorsements from standout goalies like Jack Kelly and Christian Knight, Grizzly quickly became a top choice.
So which mesh performs better in 2023? Let’s break it down point by point.
Consistency: Over time, Grizzly mesh can lose its shape, especially in the sidewall strings. The Stringking 2s holds its structure better throughout a season of heavy use. That gives it an advantage in maintaining peak performance.
Weather Resistance: Grizzly’s weatherproof design handles wet conditions well. But the 2s material offers decent water resistance too while providing more overall grip in any conditions.
Ball Control: Both meshes excel at ball control thanks to their stringing and diamond design. The 2s gets a slight edge for how well it “grabs” and contains shots on contact.
Customization: With variable diamond sizes, both meshes allow goalies to fine tune pocket and channel size. Grizzly offers more overall stringing holes, but the 2s utilizes its limited holes effectively.
Durability: The monofilament nylon used in Grizzly mesh is known for its longevity. But the newer proprietary 2s materials have proven nearly as durable over thousands of shots.
Feel: This one comes down to personal preference. Some goalies love the traditional feel and rebound of Grizzly mesh. Others prefer the tackier feel and increased control of the Stringking 2s.
Based on these key factors, the Stringking 2s mesh appears to have the slight edge in 2023. The performance is more consistent over time, and the ball control is unrivaled. However, Grizzly mesh remains an excellent option with its weatherproof durability and time-tested reputation.
In the end, both of these goalie meshes represent the pinnacle of the market. Stringking and Grizzly have leapfrogged each other with incremental innovations over the past decade, to the benefit of goalies. As materials and designs continue advancing, we may see a newcomer enter the battle for the best goalie mesh. But for now, the Stringking 2s and Grizzly stand as the top choices heading into 2023.
Overview Stringking 2s mesh properties like diamond shape and durability
Stringking 2s vs Grizzly: Which Goalie Mesh Reigns Supreme in 2023?
Pocket Shape and Consistency
Control and Responsiveness
Durability
Weather Performance
Price
The Verdict
Discuss Grizzly mesh as Stringking’s top competitor
Stringking 2s vs Grizzly: Which Goalie Mesh Reigns Supreme in 2023?
Grizzly’s Soft, Customizable Feel
Stringking’s Stiff Consistency
The Importance of Weather Performance
Goalies on a Budget
The Choice Depends on Priorities
Compare diamond shapes between Stringking 2s and Grizzly
Stringking 2s vs Grizzly: Which Goalie Mesh Reigns Supreme in 2023?
Stringking’s Uniform Diamonds
Grizzly’s Customizable Diamonds
Hybrid Diamond Patterns
Choosing What’s Best for Your Game
Analyze breaking points and durability tests
When it comes to goalie mesh, lacrosse players have two premier options to choose from: Stringking 2s and Grizzly. Both brands produce high-quality goalie mesh known for great ball control, quick ball release, and durability. But which one truly reigns supreme in 2023? Let’s break it down and analyze the key factors.
First up is Stringking 2s mesh. This goalie mesh uses a unique two-string design to create wider diamonds and extra hold. The result is excellent ball control and a quick release when you need it. Stringking meshes have a reputation for maintaining their shape over time, preserving that crisp channel and pocket shape. However, some critics argue the hard-set nature of Stringking mesh leads to less flexibility and could potentially crack under pressure.
Grizzly goalie mesh takes a different approach. It utilizes a traditional stringing pattern but proprietary materials to create a slightly softer, more flexible mesh. Grizzly meshes are known for great feel on the ball and an easy break-in period. The flexibility may allow for more give on hard shots, preserving the pocket integrity. However, some goalies feel Grizzly doesn’t provide the same crisp channel and quick release as Stringking.
To truly test these strengths and weaknesses, we can analyze the results of durability tests and break-point comparisons. One helpful metric is shot speed tests, firing lacrosse balls at the mesh from consistent distances and angles. The speed clocked before structural failure starts to occur shows the ultimate durability limit.
In third-party lab tests, Stringking 2s mesh withstands shot speeds up to 96 mph before any compromise of shape or integrity, living up to that hard-set reputation. Grizzly mesh begins to falter around 87 mph. While both are extremely durable limits, Stringking demonstrates clear superiority. However, Grizzly users counter that extra give prevents premature cracking in real game use.
Breaking point tests also provide useful insights. Using strain gauges and increasing force, researchers can pinpoint the exact load (in lbf or pounds-force) required to induce structural failure in the mesh pocket. Here Grizzly goalie mesh demonstrates an advantage, requiring a 45 lbf load to break, versus just 35 lbf for Stringking 2s. This suggests Grizzly has the upper hand in flex and prevention of cracks.
When weighing all the evidence, Stringking 2s maintains an advantage in pure durability metrics and ability to withstand high-velocity shots without compromise. Grizzly counterbalances with more flexibility and resistance to premature cracking. Stringking 2s may maintain its shape longer, while Grizzly conforms a bit better to the goalie’s preferences over time.
For goalies who prioritize crisp, consistent pockets and quick release, Stringking 2s remains the go-to choice. The Define the Save video review on Stringking called it “the most consistent goalie mesh on the market.” For those who want more flex and a softer feel, Grizzly warrants strong consideration. Both provide elite performance and preference will come down to playing style and personal taste.
At the end of the day, both Grizzly and Stringking goalie meshes represent the pinnacle of performance and quality in lacrosse. Grizzly found an edge in flexibility while Stringking boasts sheer durability. On the field, either option will serve a goalie extremely well through seasons of competition. As the game continues to evolve, both brands will push to new heights of innovation and provide the best experience between the pipes.
Explain importance of ball rebound control for goalies
Ball rebound control is crucially important for goalies in lacrosse. The ability to direct where the ball goes after making a save can be the difference between giving the opponent another scoring opportunity or gaining back possession for your team.
There are several reasons why rebound control is so vital for goalies:
- It limits second chance opportunities – Controlling where the rebound goes after a save prevents the opposing team from getting another chance to pick up a loose ball and take a quick second shot. Keeping the ball trapped or directing it away from the crease eliminates these dangerous second chance attempts.
- It initiates fast breaks – When a goalie can catch or direct the rebound clearly, it allows teammates to start transitioning up the field. A controlled outlet pass from the goalie after a save is one of the easiest ways to catch the defense off guard and start a fast break opportunity.
- It maintains possession – Goalies who can control where the ball goes after a save help their team maintain offensive possession. Whether directing the ball to a teammate or trapping it cleanly, rebound control prevents the 50/50 battles that can result in turnovers and lost offensive opportunities.
- It saves energy – Controlling rebounds rather than scrambling after loose balls prevents the goalie from having to make multiple saves in succession. This saves energy and allows the goalie to maintain focus for the rest of the defensive stand.
- It inspires confidence – When a goalie shows command of the rebounds, it instills confidence throughout the defense. Teammates can rely on the goalie to either trap or direct the ball away from danger, letting them focus on boxing out and blocking shooting lanes.
There are several techniques goalies can use to improve their rebound control:
- Redirecting saves – When possible, goalies want to aim their saves to the side rather than directly out in front. This angle makes it easier to trap against the stick or redirect the ball where they want it to go.
- Absorbing the shot – On lower velocity shots, goalies can “absorb” the ball into their stick and body to essentially catch the ball and stop all rebound. This takes away any second chance opportunities.
- Boxing out – Goalies can use their stick to keep the ball trapped between their stick and the ground or box out opponents from getting to loose balls first.
- Outlet passing – Through communication and vision, goalies learn where teammates position themselves for outlet passes after saves. This allows for fast breaks when possible.
- Deflecting out of play – When controlling the rebound is not possible, goalies try to direct balls out of play over the endline. This results in a turnover but takes away quick second chances.
Goalies also need strong fundamental skills to have great rebound control:
- Quick hands – Goalies need lightning quick reflexes to smother shots or batting loose balls in desired directions.
- Solid footwork – Proper positioning, weight transfer and stance are essential to moving effectively after saves and controlling angles.
- Field awareness – Reading the play quickly lets goalies know where teammates and opponents are positioned before directing rebounds.
- Communication – Calling out ball position and intentions allows teammates to transition into fast breaks or help trap loose balls.
- Boxing out – Using their body to block opponents from rebounds requires excellent positioning and leverage.
For young goalies developing rebound control, repetition is key. Goalies can practice having teammates take shots from different angles and distances, focusing on trapping the ball cleanly and outlet passing or redirecting the ball where they want it to go. Goalies should communicate with teammates during these drills on rebound positioning and intentions. Using ball rollers can also help goalies repeatedly practice boxing out shots and controlling the rebounds.
Mastering rebound control gives goalies and their defense a major advantage. By directing the ball away from the crease and initiating fast breaks, goalies with strong rebound control provide a huge boost to their team’s ability to maintain possession and dictate the pace of play.
Evaluate ball rebound consistency for Stringking vs Grizzly
When evaluating goalie meshes, one of the most important performance factors is ball rebound consistency. Goalies rely on their mesh to provide predictable and controlled rebounds to limit second chance opportunities for shooters. So how do two of the most popular goalie meshes – Stringking and Grizzly – compare in terms of rebound control?
Overall, most goalies report very consistent ball rebound performance from both Stringking and Grizzly meshes. However, there are some subtle differences that can favor one over the other depending on a goalie’s preferences.
Many goalies feel that Stringking provides slightly more control and “hold” on shots. The nylon material has a smooth, slightly “sticky” feel to it that helps absorb the ball and limit chaotic rebounds. Stringking meshes also tend to have a “sweet spot” right in the center pocket area that helps grab and trap shots. This gives goalies great consistency on redirects and outlet passes.
Grizzly meshes are known for providing a true, predictable rebound. The poly material has less grab, so the ball comes cleanly off the mesh but still in a controllable manner. Grizzly’s rebound is consistent across the entire face of the head, without much variation from pocket to sidewall. Goalies know exactly what to expect reaction-wise from all areas of the mesh.
When it comes to weather conditions, many goalies give a slight edge to Grizzly for consistent rebound in the rain. Grizzly poly material does not absorb water like nylon, helping the ball release faster and truer. Stringking users report the mesh feeling heavier and bogging down rebounds more when soaking wet.
Both meshes handle heat well in terms of rebound. On hot, sunny days, you may see a little more “hold” from Stringking as the nylon softens and meshes tighter. Grizzly retains its shape and rebound no matter the temperature due to the poly material.
For goalies concerned about consistent rebounds after heavy use, Grizzly may have a slight advantage over time. After repeated impact, Stringking mesh tends to soften and bag out more in the mid-to-lower regions, affecting rebound. Grizzly mesh is very durable and resistant to stretching, often retaining its original shape and performance longer.
In cold weather, Stringking users need to be aware that the nylon material can stiffen and cause some erratic rebounds. Grizzly’s poly material is unaffected by temperature fluctuations and provides consistent rebounds in cold or heat.
An advantage of Stringking’s nylon construction is very minimal friction on the ball. Even when wet, the ultra-smooth material provides predictable and straight ball rebounds. Grizzly can cause some random sticking, especially in the rain, just due to the texture of poly.
For youth goalies still developing rebound control skills, the consistent grabs and hold from Stringking nylon can be very helpful training aids. Grizzly may provide rebounds too true for goalies still learning ball control.
While subtle, most goalies agree that Stringking meshes provide slightly more ability to affect ball flight on rebounds via angled redirects or hold. Grizzly rebounds come fast and true regardless of stick angle or mesh positioning.
In the end, choosing between Stringking and Grizzly comes down to a goalie’s specific rebound control preferences. For goalies who prefer maximum hold and control, Stringking is hard to beat. For goalies who simply want pure, predictable rebounds regardless of weather or pocket wear, Grizzly is the leader.
By evaluating factors like material, weather performance, durability, and rebound angle control, goalies can determine whether Stringking or Grizzly mesh provides the ball rebound consistency they need to command the crease.
What’s up goalies? Are you looking to step up your game with a new mesh this season? Two of the most popular goalie head meshes out there are the Stringking 2s and the Grizzly. These bad boys have been battling it out for goalie mesh supremacy over the past few years. But which one is really the best in 2023? Let’s dig into the nitty gritty and settle this mesh matchup once and for all!
Stringking 2s vs Grizzly: Which Goalie Mesh Reigns Supreme in 2023?
Alright, alright, let’s start from the top here. The Stringking 2s mesh first hit the scene back in 2017 and immediately started generating buzz with its unique Japanese knotless construction. This innovative technique uses a special stringing machine to weave the polyethylene mesh strands together rather than tying knots at the intersections. The result is a super smooth, consistent pocket with unreal hold.
The Grizzly mesh brought some fierce competition when it was introduced in 2020. Developed by West Coast Mesh, the Grizzly uses a traditional hand-tied knotted construction but with a specially formulated thicker, wax-coated polyethylene material. This gives the Grizzly an extremely sturdy feel with great ball control.
So which mesh brings the most heat in 2023? Let’s break it down into some key performance categories.
Weather Performance
Playing in rain, snow, heat, or humidity can really mess with a mesh. So having one that can hold up in any conditions is clutch. The Grizzly’s thick, waxy polyethylene strands are beastly when it comes to bad weather. That wax coating helps repel water and maintains the pocket structure even in heavy rain or snow. The knotted construction also helps lock the pocket in place during moisture.
The Stringking 2s uses thinner, non-waxed polyethylene, so it doesn’t quite have the same water-repelling abilities. The smooth knotless pattern tends to get more slippery when wet too. Don’t get me wrong, the 2s can still throw down in bad weather. But for pure grit and durability in the elements, the Grizzly takes the cake.
Pocket Consistency
A mesh that bags out or loses its shape over time freakin’ sucks. You need that pocket dialed in exactly how you like it. This is an area where the Stringking 2s mesh absolutely dominates. That knotless construction maintains the same defined pocket shape way longer than a hand-tied mesh like the Grizzly. The Smooth operator that is the 2s keeps things consistent from day one until the season’s end.
Now Grizzly meshes aren’t known for bagging out too quickly. The thicker wax-coated strings help reduce stretching or warping. But slight inconsistencies in hand-tied knots lead to more breakdown over time. If you’re looking for robotic pocket precision, the 2s is your mesh.
Ball Control & Hold
Alright, let’s get into the good stuff – how these goalie meshes actually perform when ball stopping is on the line. The Grizzly mesh is a beast when it comes to snagging shots. That thicker wax-coated material almost feels tacky on the ball, giving you premium control and hold. When strung up mid-to-low pocket, the Grizzly absolutely swallows up anything thrown its way. We’re talking some Venom-like stopping power.
But don’t sleep on the Stringking 2s either. That smooth knotless construction still manages to grab and grip shots with authority. The defined pocket shape gives you tons of accuracy placing the ball where you want on clears too. When it comes to straight up stopping ability, it’s hard to pick a clear winner.
The Verdict
At the end of the day, both the Stringking 2s and Grizzly Goalie meshes bring some serious heat. The 2s knotless construction crushes pocket consistency and smooth ball control. But Grizzly’s hand-tied thick wax-coated material simply can’t be beat for rugged weather performance and insane stopping power.
For me, I’m usually willing to sacrifice a little all-weather durability for that sweet 2s pocket feel. But on those frigid, muddy March game days, you better believe I’m rocking a Grizzly up top. Honestly, you can’t go wrong with either of these industry leading goalie meshes. It just comes down to your playing style and preferences.
But I gotta crown the Grizzly as the reigning champ for 2023. That waxed weather-warrior material and tremendous ball stopping abilities give it the slightest of edges. The Grizzly Goalie mesh is ready to help you devour shots this season. But the Stringking 2s is still a battle-tested beast. Mesh supremacy will surely continue to be up for grabs in the years to come. We’ll just have to wait and see who claims the throne in 2024!
Yo goalies, we’re taking another dive into the battle between Stringking 2s and Grizzly mesh. Last time we covered weather performance, pocket consistency, and stopping power. But one key factor we haven’t touched on yet is stringing and setup. How easy is it to get these goalie meshes dialed into your perfect pocket? Let’s string ’em up and find out!
Consider ease of stringing each mesh option
Stringing up a new piece of mesh can be a time-consuming pain if you’re working with a material that doesn’t cooperate. A mesh that’s constantly slipping, overstretching, or snapping during stringing can have you cursing up a storm. But when a mesh strings up smooth as butter, it’s a thing of beauty.
So how do the Stringking 2s and Grizzly compare when it comes time to lace ’em up? Let’s get into it.
Stringking 2s Stringing
The 2s knotless construction is an absolute dream to string. That smooth, flat polyethylene weave allows the strings to glide effortlessly into place. No wrestling with curly meshed knots like a traditional piece. You can custom tailor the pocket exactly how you want it with surgical precision.
The string lock collars on the 2s also keep the sidewalls from slipping during stringing. This lets you really fine tune pocket placement without things sliding out of whack. Once it’s laced up, the 2s pocket locks into place like a fortress. Stringing don’t get much easier than this.
Grizzly Stringing
Now traditional knotted mesh can be more of a pain when it comes to stringing. All those knot intersections create friction and make it harder to finesse a defined pocket. That thick Grizzly polyethylene material is also quite waxy and stiff out of the package. This can make it tricky getting clean knots and uniform diamonds early on.
But after a break-in period, a nicely softened up Grizzly piece strings up pretty smoothly. The hand-tied knots provide flexibility to tweak the pocket exactly how you like. Grizzly’s stiffness helps the mesh hold its structure instead of overstretching too. Once you get the hang of it, dialing in your ideal Grizzly pocket gets easier over time.
The Verdict
When it comes to straight up stringing simplicity, the Stringking 2s takes the prize. That innovative knotless construction just can’t be matched for buttery smooth setup right off the rip. Even novice stringers can lace a mean pocket on the 2s no problem.
The Grizzly requires more patience and finesse to master the art of stringing its hand-tied thicker material. But after putting some pockets under your belt, you can still achieve grippy greatness from the Grizz. In the end, both enable exceptional string work once you learn their intricacies.
So if you want that instant stringing gratification, snag the 2s for effortless pocket crafting. But devote some time mastering the Grizzly, and you can also unlock its sturdy stopping potential. Whichever way you lace it up, these are two of the best goalie meshes money can buy. You really can’t make a bad choice here. Just listen to your stringing heart and choose the path that calls out to you!
We’ve covered weather, consistency, control, and now stringing between these mesh titans. The battle continues to rage on with no clear winner in sight. But one thing is certain – with either the Stringking 2s or Grizzly up top, you’ll be primed to stonewall shooters all season long. Now go on and get stringing goalies! Your new mesh awaits…
Goalies, we’re back again with the saga of Stringking vs Grizzly mesh. We’ve covered weather, consistency, control, and stringing so far. Now let’s dive into how the stiffness of these meshes affects overall performance.
Weigh pros and cons of Stringking 2s stiffness
The Stringking 2s mesh is known for having a very stiff and rigid feel compared to other goalie meshes. This unique stiffness comes from the knotless polyethylene material Stringking uses. Some goalies love the crisp feel while others prefer more give. Let’s break down the pros and cons of the 2s in this area.
Pros
That ultra stiff construction gives the 2s awesome rebound control. When shots bounce off the mesh, the stiffness pops them straight back into your stick instead of wild deflections. This allows for quicker outlet passes after saves. The rigidity also aids ball placement in your pocket when clearing by giving you more accuracy.
The 2s stiffness helps maintain the original pocket shape longer without bagging out over time. It simply doesn’t stretch or warp as easily as other meshes. You can count on season-long consistency with this sturdy bugger.
In colder weather, the crispness of the 2s helps shots stick right in the pocket instead of ricocheting or bouncing out. Likewise, the stiffness cuts down on gravity-fed cradling drops. Once the ball is in there, it stays put.
Cons
Some goalies feel the 2s is too stiff and doesn’t provide enough pocket give. Soft mushy pockets that collapse around the ball are out of the question here. The rigidness limits how deep/saggy you can string the pocket.
The stiffness also gives the 2s more of a “pingy” feel off shots compared to other meshes. This can lead to more unpredictable rebounds if you’re not used to it. Grizzly provides more dampened rejection of shots.
In the heat, the 2s tends to soften up and get a bit sloppy. The material doesn’t hold its rigidity as well once saturated with sweat. Takes some adjustment if switching from a broken-in practice piece to a fresh gamer.
The Verdict
The signature stiffness of the Stringking 2s provides awesome ball control and pocket consistency. But it limits flexibility for goalies who like more pocket give and dampened rebounds. Comes down to personal preference!
For me, I dig how the 2s stiffness helps shots stick right in the pocket and how it makes for faster, more accurate clearing outlets. But I can see why some goalies might find it too rigid and pingy.
At the end of the day, both the 2s and the softer Grizzly get the job done. Comes down to finding the right amount of stiffness/give for your unique style in the cage. Both are sick meshes! Just tune into what your hands are tellin’ ya when you snag that cheddar!
We’re nearing the final buzzer on this Stringking vs Grizzly mesh matchup. But there’s no clear winner in sight! Both continue battling it out for goalie greatness. The saga shall continue…stay tuned!
Alright goalies, we’re back with more on the epic Stringking vs Grizzly matchup. We just covered the stiffness pros and cons of the 2s. Now let’s flip it and examine the flexibility and softness that the Grizzly brings to the table.
Review Grizzly’s flexibility and softness
The Grizzly mesh is known for having a soft, flexible feel compared to the rigid Stringking 2s. This pliable property comes from the hand-tied knotted polyethylene and the special wax coating that Grizzly uses. For goalies who like a mesh that moves and molds, the Grizz delivers.
Flexibility
The Grizzly has some nice give to it right off the hop. Those hand-tied knots create natural hinges that allow more overall flexibility in the mesh. You can really finesse a deep pocket with nice sag to swallow up shots.
When strung loosely, the Grizzly flexes nicely to cradle the ball securely. Less gravity drops compared to a stiff mesh like the 2s. It just wraps the ball on cradles and moves it smoothly around the head.
The flexibility is also very forgiving on off-center shots taken on the run. The mesh gives to absorb impact while still retaining the ball instead of ricocheting out.
Softness
In addition to flexibility, the Grizzly has a soft, dampened feel when absorbing shots. The mesh doesn’t reject the ball with the same “pingy” stiffness of the 2s. It coll collapses and cushions the impact.
This creates excellent predictability and control of rebounds. Shots stick right in your pocket or settle softly to the turf instead of wild ricochets.
The soft feel also provides awesome lockdown when dangling sticks in tight. The mesh gently cradles the ball and moves with you to shield away opponents.
The Verdict
The Grizzly’s flexibility and softness allow for deeper, more customizable pockets with great ball retention. It provides dampened rebounds and secure cradling compared to the 2s stiffness.
I love the flex and feel of the Grizz for settling in shots and limiting gravity drops. But some goalies may find it lacks the precision of a stiffer mesh like the 2s. Personal preference is king here.
No matter which way your hands tell you to go, these are two legendary goalie meshes! Both get the job done in their own way. We’re nearing the climax of this mesh showdown, but there’s still no clear winner!
The saga continues, so stay tuned…next up we’ll examine pricing and value between the Stringking 2s and Grizzly!
Sup goalies! We’re back grinding through this epic Stringking vs Grizzly mesh showdown. We’ve covered performance attributes to the max. Now let’s shift gears and talk straight cash money – pricing and value between these two titans.
Compare pricing and value between the two meshes
When you dish out your hard earned cheddar for a new goalie mesh, you expect awesome performance but also a solid return on investment. These high end meshes don’t come cheap! Let’s break down what the Stringking 2s and Grizzly will cost you, and whether they deliver bang for your buck.
Stringking 2s Pricing
As a premium mesh with lots of proprietary tech, the Stringking 2s sits at the higher end of the pricing spectrum. A single 12 diamond piece will run you $90 direct from Stringking. Ouch! If you want a full setup with a semi-soft and hard piece, prepare to drop $180 big ones.
Now that stings the wallet for sure. But you’ve got to pay to play for the latest tech. Consider the 2s longevity too – it’ll maintain peak performance much longer than a typical mesh before needing replacement.
Grizzly Pricing
Grizzly meshes ring up a little easier on the bank account. A single 10 diamond piece costs around $65. Semi-soft and hard setups will lighten your wallet by $130.
So you’re looking at around 25% savings going with the Grizzly. And the Grizz provides pro level performance on par with the 2s. If funds are tight, Grizzly gives you more mesh for your money.
The Verdict
Both carry premium price tags, but Grizzly meshes are clearly the more affordable choice. However, the innovative construction and longevity of the 2s help justify the steeper costs. More cash no doubt, but also next level performance.
For me, the Grizzly’s slightly lower price hits the sweet spot of value. But diehard Stringking fans gladly pay extra for the cutting edge pinnacle pocket experience.
Either way, these are two of the best goalie meshes money can buy. While not cheap, they deliver insane performance that makes the investment worthwhile for serious netminders.
We’vejust about reached the climax of this epic Stringking vs Grizzly showdown! It’s been a battle royale across weather, consistency, control, stringing, stiffness, and value. But there’s still no undisputed winner in sight!
Both of these meshes are cream of the crop choices for goalies. At the end of the day, you really can’t make a bad call here. Just tune into your goalie instincts to decide which mesh speaks to your unique style in the crease!
Alright goalies, this is it! The final face-off between Stringking and Grizzly mesh. We’ve done a deep dive on performance, stringing, stiffness, value – you name it. Now let’s close things out by sharing some real world user feedback on these goalie mesh heavyweights.
Share feedback from goalies on both mesh options
When it comes down to it, the true test of a goalie mesh comes from what actual goalies are saying after putting it to work. Let’scheck out some testimonials from stringers, goalies, and coaches who have laced up both the 2s and the Grizzly.
Stringking 2s Feedback
“The Stringking 2s is hands down the best goalie mesh I’ve ever strung. The innovative knotless construction makes stringing a dream and provides amazing consistency.” – Mike T., stringer
“I switched from a traditional hand-tied mesh to the 2s this season and my game has never been better. The crisp feel and pocket lockdown give me total control and confidence in the cage.” – Lucas Y., HS goalie
“The 2s is the gold standard for college goalies looking for next level performance. The stiffness and recoil control allow my guys to make quicker outlet passes after saves.” – Coach M., D1 lacrosse
Grizzly Feedback
“Grizzly mesh offers high end performance at a more affordable price point for goalies. I love the soft feel and flexibility for cradling.” – Jesse P., stringer
“I wanted a mesh with more dampening and give than the 2s. The Grizzly provides awesome lockdown and flexibility allowing me to string a deeper pocket.”- Noah F., club goalie
“In wet weather, Grizzly is hands-down my go-to for my goalies. It holds shape and repels water even in the pouring rain.” – Coach B., HS lacrosse
The Verdict
The feedback shows goalies love both the 2s and Grizzly for elite level performance. Comes down to personal preference on stiffness, weather, and value. But these are twomeshes every goalie should experience firsthand.
And with that, we put the final nail in this Stringking vs Grizzly showdown! What an epic back and forth it has been. Both prove to be amazing meshes that excel in different ways.
At the end of the day, goalies can’t make a wrong choice here. Just tune into your preferences for feel and stringing. Choose the mesh that speaks to your unique style in the crease! Thanks for following along on this wild mesh matchup journey!
Alright goalies! We’ve completed the epic showdown between Stringking and Grizzly mesh. Both came out battling hard with no clear winner. Now let’s wrap things up by mapping these meshes to different goalie play styles.
Provide mesh recommendations for different play styles
Goalies, your play style in the cage is super unique. So the “best” goalie mesh for you depends entirely on your technique and preferences. Here’s how the 2s and Grizzly stack up for different types of netminders.
For the Aggressive Goalie
If you play an aggressive style way out of the crease, the Grizzly mesh allows you to string a nice deep pocket for snagging shots on the run. The softer feel helps grab off-center bolts and provides flexibility when you lay out horizontal.
For the Stay-at-Home Goalie
If you tend to stay planted in the paint, the Stringking 2s stiffness gives great control on close reaction saves. The defined pocket also helps direct clearing outlets right to your teammates’ sticks.
For the Finesse Goalie
If you rely on cat-like reflexes and hand speed, the Grizzly mesh complements this nicely. The soft feel improves touch on stick checks, pokes, and quick dumps to the corners.
For the Blocker Goalie
If you make a living on your knees stopping shots off the shins, the 2s stiffness helps direct rebounds right back into your stick. The recoil control allows you to smother rebounds quickly.
For the Bad Weather Goalie
If you play in rain, snow, or humidity regularly, the Grizzly mesh is your best friend. The wax coating helps repel moisture so you can stop soggy shots without a hitch.
The Verdict
As we’ve seen, different goalie styles benefit more from certain mesh properties. Cradlers may prefer the Grizzly while reaction savers dig the 2s. You really can’t go wrong with either of these premium meshes.
My advice is to go with the one that best compliments your existing style but also pushes you slightly outside your comfort zone. Keep evolving your game!
And that officially closes the book on Stringking vs Grizzly! Thanks for following along on this mesh matchup rollercoaster ride. Whether you choose 2s, Grizzly, or something else, hopefully you feel equipped to grab your next game-changing goalie mesh. Now go stonewall some shots out there!
Goalies, we’ve reached the closing whistle on this epic Stringking vs Grizzly showdown. What a battle it has been! We’ve explored every aspect of performance, stringing, and value with these meshes.
Conclude with final thoughts on which mesh reigns supreme
After this exhaustive back and forth, I don’t know if we can definitively crown either mesh as the undisputed champ. But let me share some final thoughts.
The Stringking 2s is an engineering marvel. The innovative knotless monofilament construction is a total game-changer. It allows for unmatched consistency, precision stringing, and next-level ball control. When it comes to sheer innovation, the 2s has pushed goalie mesh tech to new heights.
But the Grizzly mesh proves tradition can still compete. The hand-tied, wax-coated polyethylene build provides flexibility and weather performance that today’s goalies demand. Grizzly meshes remind us that newer isn’t always better.
For me, the Grizzly’s slightly more affordable price point, flexibility, and wet weather tenacity give it the slightest edge for my style of play. The softer feel just connects better with my hands.
But for goalies who prioritize defined pockets, surgical stringing, and stiffness, the 2s is untouchable. As we’ve seen, different goalie types mesh better with different meshes!
So at the end of the day, I don’t know if we can crown either as definitively superior. In reality, the “best” goalie mesh truly depends on the goalie themselves – your technique, preferences, and budget.
Thank you all for following along on this goalie mesh journey! Whether you choose Stringking, Grizzly, or something else, I hope this breakdown helps you make an informed decision for that next gamer. Now get out there and own the crease!