15+ String Art Kits That Will Have You Creating Colorful Decorative Art
This post may contain affiliate links. If you make a purchase, My Modern Met may earn an affiliate commission. Please read our disclosure for more info.
There are more ways to draw than just with a pen or pencil. A piece of string can mimic a line drawing to create artwork that looks like an energetic pen sketch. But string art has qualities that take it beyond a drawing; it has a tactile, three-dimensional feel that you can’t help but want to reach out and touch.
So, what is string art, exactly? The craft can vary but typically it uses yarn, wood, and nails to create a design. The nails are hammered into certain arrangements on the wood and then the string is used to connect the “dots” and fill in the image. By continuously wrapping the string around the nails in different directions and configurations, it creates visual depth and brings the image to life.
Winding the fiber around the nails makes this activity easy to do for both kids and adults; string art kits have become a very popular activity for this reason. Makers have created all-inclusive kits that (often) feature the nails pre-hammered into the wood, which leaves you free to fill out the design with the string. When you’re done, it makes a great addition to your wall or as a gift.
From flowers to rainbows to the moon and stars, you’re sure to find a design that you love. Scroll down to see some of our favorite string art kits and downloadable patterns.
Want to create string art? Try one of these colorful, all-inclusive kits and patterns.
Simply Strung AZ | $44+
Stitchery Dot Shop | $22.19
Three Cacti Kit
This N That | $35
Stitchery Dot Shop | $22. 19
Hands In Art Studio | $15
Potted Succulent Kit
Hands In Art Studio | $22
Steens Strings | $22.52
Hot Air Balloon Kit
Stitchery Dot Shop | $22.19
Shark and Jellyfish Kits
MA Art Co. | $12+ (each)
String of the Art | $64.95
Mamma Barbara & Mr Alpha | $8.81
Simply Strung AZ | $29+
Monstera Leaf Kit
D’Arte Studio11 | $12.99
Potted Cactus Kit
Star and Moon Template
Jess Thompson Design Co. | $3
Harry Potter Pattern
Hands In Art Studio | $5. 50
10+ All-Inclusive Arts & Crafts Kits to Jumpstart Your Next Hobby
Learn to Love the Loom When You Try the Ancient Art of Weaving
10+ All-Inclusive Latch and Rug Hook Kits That’ll Have You Creating Retro-Inspired Designs
String Drill Kit (Universal) | Big Moss Golf
The NEW Universal String Drill Kit will now retro-fit to any Big Moss Putting Green and Real Practice green at the golf course!
Now you may use one of Michael Breed’s favorite drills on any of our putting greens and outside on a real green. Tees have been included in this pack for quick installation onto a real putting green.
This drill allows you to monitor your sight line over the ball, body alignment to your target, the putters centerline, as well as the putter and ball’s path to the hole. Its easy to use and sets up in seconds. It will work with any hole on in your putting green, straight putts and breaking putts.
** NOTE ** Please reference the length of your putting green in the notes section of the checkout page.
Set Up Notes: Place one ‘L’ bracket on either side of the green. Lock the string with stopper into one bracket, walk the string to the other side and adjust the tensioner to the desired length.
The goal is to line your putt up using your dominant eye by sliding the brackets over your intended putting line. Set the ball on your line, under the string so it bisects the string. When you set up to the ball, your vision should be such that you see a perfect half of the ball on either side of the string while looking over it OR slightly more of the ball to the inside of the string. The string should cover up the centerline of your putter at address and your body should be aligned off the parallel of the string line. Your goal is to keep the putter’s center moving directly under the string, especially in the range of 6-8 inches before and after the ball. We know the putter path may arc back & through a bit, but the area before and after the ball should be the greatest focus.
This drill helps you see the association between the putter’s path and face angle and allows you to retrain a more efficient stroke so you can hit your intended target with greater precision.
Monthly DIY String Art Subscription BoxMonthly DIY String Art Subscription Box | Cratejoy
Unwind by yourself or with a friend!
A subscription box for everyone and anyone that loves to do string art! Create your own, one of a kind string art masterpiece by putting your unique touch to each monthly design! All supplies included!
- At least one seasonal set each Quarter.
- Quality Product in each box!
- Templates to play it safe, but adaptable for the risk takers of the world! Make it your own creation!
- All craft and art supplies will be provided to complete template item. All you need is a hammer!
- Substitutions available upon request for holiday boxes.
Customer Questions (2)Ask Question
Q: Is it possible to order a box as a gift in advance without the recipient knowing? If I purchase today, how does it remain a secret for Christmas?Asked by Christie C., December 2020
KahluasStringsNthings answered…December 2020
You could put your own email, or I can disable the setting so that it does not send the Gifting and Tracking information 🙂Sign in to contact the seller
1 Vote+ Add an answer
Q: what are the crafts for December?Asked by Noor M., November 2020
KahluasStringsNthings answered…November 2020
Our December Box will have a focus of New Beginnings and hopefully create a sense of self love by creating a plaque reminding you of your potential through 2021 and how new beginnings will create new memories. I will be showcasing the upcoming box this week. 🙂Sign in to contact the seller
Vote for this+ Add an answer
Sep 20, 2021
Peggy K.Subscribed for 18 days
I did up the Sunflower today. It was fun. All of the materials were of good quality. Shipping was quick and came well packaged.
Super helpful, friendly and GREAT box!
Dec 31, 2020
Christie C.Subscribed for 6 months
I got this box for my mom for Christmas and it was amazing! Crystal was very helpful answering my questions about ordering and then changing the shipping address so I could have the first box shipped to me to keep it a surprise and then update the shipping address later. She was quick to get it shipped out to try and ensure it arrived before Christmas (it did!) and even included a hand written card with our personalized message. Crystal also noticed and issue with the shipping charges and immediately reversed the incorrect charge! I highly recommend KahluasStringsNthings for anyone looking for something fun to do!
Concentrate and relax
Feb 25, 2021
Pamela B.Subscribed for 4 months
I really enjoyed my first box. It took a little time to get comfortable but it really made me focus and relax while I was doing the project and it was so much fun to see it come together. I love that everything is included, and the fun embellishments in addition to the string art!
Great box for crafters
Jan 26, 2021
Meggin B.Subscribed for 6 months
I’ve received this box for three months now and really enjoy it. Everything is packaged extremely well and the instructions are clear and helpful. Shipping notifications have been provided and shipping is always fast. All you need is a hammer, some patience (it takes a while to get all the nails in and the string where you want it), and some creativity and you’re sure to have fun!
Great New Hobby
Dec 29, 2020
Brittany S.Subscribed for 6 months
I received this as a gift and love my new hobby! The designs are beautiful and the packaging is well done and lovely. Excited for my next month!
Dec 29, 2020
I bought this for a gift and they loved it. Awesome ideas and great packaging. I appreciate being able to gift things someone can do on their time frame and that’s up lifting.
Best craft box yet!
Mar 20, 2021
I think the box is amazing! So surprised to see two full sized crafts along with there hand painted backgrounds! Everything is so cute and I am extremely happy with everything! Decently would recommend buying this box if you like crafts!
The perfect “ME” day box!
Oct 05, 2020
I really enjoyed doing this kit!
It turned out SUPER CUTE!
Came with everything I needed to complete it.
Even things you wouldn’t think you needed!
Photos from reviews of Monthly DIY String Art Kit…
Past boxes from Monthly DIY String Art Kit…
Your first box will ship between the 10th and 13th of each month. Please order by the 9th to get the current box.
Cancellation & Refund Policy
KahluasStringsNthings was featured in these articles…
KahluasStringsNthings appears in these collections...
Questions for KahluasStringsNthings?Sign in to contact the seller
DIY String Alignment KIt
Are you looking to have full control over your car setup and alignment but frustrated with using strings on jack stands and want something totally customizable to your vehicle? This kit makes it easy to get accurate and repeatable toe adjustment results.
The Ansix Auto String Alignment kit uses standard 3/4″ square and round tubing so you can cut the lengths to exactly what you want. This kit can be easily assembled using simple hand tools and quickly setup in your home shop or at the track. Because the string is mounted to your vehicle, you are able to roll the car back and forth to settle the suspension without having to reset your string. The kit is made of durable PETG 3D printed parts with stainless steel hardware.
The standard 3/4″ size is available at any metal supply shop for around $30-$40 (using 3/4″ – 1/16″wall square and round tubing, around 20ft of each) and fishing line or kite string complete the kit.
The Tubing blocks allow for easy adjustment of the string to set it up perfectly on your car and lock into place with the thumb knobs. The chassis hooks fit nicely on radiator supports or in trunk trim. The string tube blocks hold the 3/4″ round tubing and allow for easy back and forth movement to square up your string.
x4 Tubing block with locking thumb knobs
x4 Chassis hooks with hardware
x4 String tube blocks with locking thumb knobs
This is enough to make a complete alignment set.
What you will need to buy separately:
String – I like to use kite string. Fishing line is also nice. Some like to use chalk snap lines
Tubing – 3/4″ round and square tubing. Usually sold in 20ft lengths which is enough for most vehicles. 1/16″ wall makes a nice light setup but if you want want something more substantial (less prone to move if bumped) you can go thicker. Usually these are around $1 per foot.
Polypropylene Slip plates
*NOTE: These are 3D printed parts and colour may vary. Usually sold in grey but may come in other colours.
DIY String Alignment Kit Instructions90,000 Matrix hypothesis: now everything is serious
Since ancient times, mankind has been striving to penetrate the secrets of the world and the mysteries of the Universe. The idea that we live in an artificial reality has long arisen among various philosophers.
A few thousand years ago, Plato in his “cave myth” suggested that what we see may not be real at all. The French thinker Rene Descartes theorized that nothing we feel is true except our consciousness (as a result, the phrase “I think, then I exist”), and also put forward a hypothesis according to which “some insidious genius, very powerful and prone to deception, “could make us think that there is a physical world, while in fact the sky, air, earth, light, outlines and sounds are” traps set by the scoundrel. “
According to Immanuel Kant, although a certain “thing-in-itself” underlying the images we perceive may exist, we are not given to know it. American philosopher Hilary Putnam proposed an allegory of “brains in a container.” In 2003, the Swedish transhumanist Nick Bostrom, inspired by the world famous trilogy “The Matrix”, wrote the article “Are we living in a computer simulation?”, Which caused a significant resonance in scientific and not only circles.
However, until 2010, the Matrix hypothesis, like any other hypothesis about the origin of the universe, was not taken seriously by the scientific community.Pundits tried to understand what our world is and explain its laws. Paradoxically, they assigned the essence of being to a secondary role.
But about six years ago, the opinion of educated mankind changed dramatically. The emerging considerations regarding the structure of the Universe have posed existential questions for science as well. Since then, doubts about the existence of reality are no longer perceived as a kind of innocent humor and boltology.
But why did such a seemingly fantastic hypothesis acquire in a short period of time many adherents, including, for example, the notorious Elon Musk? What compelling arguments have the Matrix supporters suddenly got hold of? After all, should we be worried about this?
Well, first things first, and we’ll start by parsing the arguments.
From time immemorial, thinkers have raised doubts about the reality of the Universe, first of all, how easily the interaction of things fits into various kinds of equations.
We all know from school that the Universe is by no means chaotic. It “works” according to a strict set of constant rules that we give names to as we discover: thermodynamics, gravity, magnetism, and relativity, for example.
But surprisingly, we are completely deprived of the opportunity to rewrite the “rules of the game” for ourselves.The “laws of nature” always remain unchanged: if it had not been for Einstein, or if his works had not survived to this day, probably some other scientist would have derived the famous equation E = MC2, because its meaning has not changed over time and will not change , despite neither new discoveries nor technological progress.
In essence, we are only “allowed” to calculate the already existing “principles of work” of reality, so that later, by changing the input data, we can get the desired result.
And what exactly is based on a strict set of rules and always gives the desired result when entering certain inputs? That’s right, the most common computer algorithm! As some philosophers have believed and continue to believe, the reason physical laws are strict and accurate is most likely because they were programmed.
Therefore, when scientists make a discovery of any law, humanity simply becomes aware of another piece of the mathematical code on which our reality is based.
The universe is ideal for the origin of life
This argument is in many respects consonant with the previous one. Proponents of the Matrix point out that many natural constants are suspiciously ideal for human existence.
If the physical laws were a little different, the Universe simply could not have arisen (at least in its present form). If the atomic bonds were a little weaker, matter would simply disintegrate. Become a drop of gravity stronger – and the stars will begin to collapse in a matter of seconds.
Why, the cosmos, the very existence of life as such, is supremely amazing! For its origin, it is necessary that everything should be “a tunic to a tunic”: for example, our planet is at an “optimal” distance from the Sun, gravity is moderately strong, and the resulting atmosphere consists of exactly the gases that we need for breathing. If the Milky Way had formed a little differently, life on Earth might never have originated.
Nevertheless, everything turned out surprisingly well for us.The universe, so to speak, is neither too warm nor too cold. Is she just … correct?
Starting from this kind of reasoning, people finally asked the question: “Why? Why is earthly conditions so great for us? ”
There were a great many explanations for this, one more fantastic than the other: from the theory of the multiverse to the divine plan. But one of the guesses says: the universe is just fake – it is a simulation launched by another creature.In some laboratory of truly universal proportions, every suitable factor was deliberately set in a fixed state, so that life could arise in the artificial universe. And then the “programmer god” started the simulation.
In philosophy, this position is called differently: the anthropic principle, “sandbox theory”, “zoo hypothesis”. But the essence of the name does not change: our whole world is just a model, and we are the heroes of a very large game The Sims.
However, both this and the previous arguments are purely abstract in nature, being derivatives of the phrase “Coincidence? I do not think”.Perhaps the supporters of the simulation hypothesis have much more compelling evidence at their disposal?
Universe is probably segmented
Perhaps it will be a surprise for you, but humanity already knows how to fully simulate reality. True, due to the high degree of complexity, today scientists are able to reliably simulate only the strong nuclear interaction – quantum chromodynamics – on the femtometer (millionths of a nanometer) scale. This is not enough to understand even the smallest microorganisms, not to mention the planets, stars and galaxies.
Nevertheless, we know that any computer model (including a model of the Universe) implies dividing virtual reality into areas within which the calculation takes place – and then connecting these areas together. Thus, a lattice is obtained that organizes and structures the digital space.
In 2012, Professor Silas Bean from the German University of Bonn and his colleagues suggested that if our universe is a simulation, then it must have some limits.In particular, these can be restrictions imposed by the spatial grid, and if they are found, people will have undeniable evidence that the visible world is just an illusion.
Scientists have begun their search. To do this, they decided to simulate a particle of the Universe, using a fine “lattice” as the structure of matter – the space-time continuum.
During the experiment, scientists have established that the existence of a universal grid implies a severe limitation on the amount of energy that cosmic particles can have.
Surprisingly, computer calculations matched real data: astronomical observations show that the energy of cosmic ray particles arriving at us from the most distant galaxies really breaks off at a certain level, which is known to physicists as the GZK limit!
However, German scientists honestly admit that their “red pill” is not without flaws. According to Professor Bean, the model of the universe can be built in a completely different way, and not just the one that they presented.Therefore, in the future, scientists intend to collect more evidence for the existence of the grid, observing how cosmic particles scatter when they “bump” into this still purely theoretical grid.
The universe “lags”
In Einstein’s twin paradox, one of two brothers of the same age goes on space travel on a rocket at almost the speed of light. Then, a year later, he returns to Earth and, to his surprise, discovers that his brother, who has remained on the planet all this time, is already an eighty-year-old man. None of them felt that their time passed in different ways, but at the time of the second meeting, the life of one twin was coming to an end, and the other was still living and living.
In objective reality, this thought experiment seems impossible. But scientists would not be scientists if they limited themselves to abstract mathematical calculations.
Time changes have been objectively studied in the real world. So, the time for particles in accelerators really slows down. Moreover, in the 1970s, researchers launched an atomic clock on an airplane around the Earth and saw with their own eyes that it began to go slower than the clock on the ground that was originally synchronized with it.But how can time, the judge of all changes, itself be subject to change?
One of the explanations sounds pretty simple. We are dealing with lag – every gamer’s nightmare.
As we know, in video games, each processing cycle is one tick. Consequently, when the computer freezes, not having time to process large flows of information, the game time also slows down a little.
The same thing happens in our real world: with an increase in speed or near massive objects, time begins to “slow down”.Scientists assume that the conditional “twin on a rocket” could only age by a year, because all the processing cycles of its system simply “hung up”.
The universe has a granular structure
We perceive the space around us as a continuous, integral structure. But in fact, it consists of many separate cells of space-time with the shortest possible length, known to scientists as the Planck length.
Of course, you cannot see these “granules” even if you put your eye very close to your hand.Analysis of the data shows that the granularity of the space is at the level of 10 – 48 meters or even less. To imagine the size of a cell, imagine a point 0.1 mm in size, located at a distance of the visible universe (about 92 million light years).
Although the universal minimum does not affect our daily life in any way, quantum physicists have already faced a problem: if you try to observe smaller objects, they simply will not look “sharp” enough.
According to scientists, these strange features of matter may serve as a clear indication that we live inside a simulation – just like when you try to view an image on a screen from a very close distance, it disintegrates into individual pixels. However, this is a very crude analogy. The pundits add that the granularity of the universe may be a consequence of more fundamental laws that determine the limits of cognizable reality.
There is nothing supernatural in the possible “code” of the Universe
If the universe is a simulation, then it must be incredibly complex “inside”, right? It’s hard to imagine that such a detailed simulation was based only on strings of faceless zeros and ones.
But, as practice shows, in reality it is quite possible to create something very complex from a relatively simple set of rules. John Conway’s Game of Life is a great example of this. This simple hack, developed by an English mathematician back in 1970, belongs to the category of so-called modeling games – games that, to one degree or another, imitate the processes taking place in real life.
“Events” Game of Life unfolds on the cellular field, which is traditionally called the “Universe”.You have at your disposal a colony of cells with the simplest vital functions, governed by a couple of extremely simple rules:
- Each cell can be in one of two states: alive or dead.
- All cells are born and die synchronously, in an instant – this is, relatively speaking, a generation.
- in an empty (dead) cell, next to which there are exactly three living cells, life is born;
- if a living cell has two or three living neighbors, then it continues to live; otherwise (if there are fewer than two or more than three neighbors) the cell dies (“from loneliness” or “from overpopulation”).
It would seem that the whole system is so transparent that it should not conceal surprises. But there are enough surprises – the complexity and organic nature of the evolution of point forms completely surpasses all predictions.
The situations that arise during the game are very similar to the real processes that occur during the origin, development and death of living beings. At first glance, ingenious colonies of cells mutate in a surprising way into more perfect organisms, which, as they develop, acquire the ability to move, absorb their neighbors and give rise to their own kind.
Of course, Conway’s brainchild is far from simulating the entire universe. Nevertheless, the toy clearly demonstrates how something complex can arise from something extremely uncomplicated.
As the announcer said in one of the episodes of Stephen Hawking’s TV show Grand Design, “Apparently, games like Game of Life with a few simple laws are capable of reproducing quite complex things, perhaps even intellect. This may require a grid of myriad squares, but this is not surprising.There are hundreds of billions of cells in our brains. ”
And some physicists go even further and draw a parallel between Conway’s brainchild and the interaction of universal particles. As we know, at a fundamental level, the Universe also consists of simple “building blocks” that are governed by a relatively small set of rules.
Simulation as natural technological progress
At first glance, the Matrix hypothesis is in serious conflict with our sensations: the world seems too realistic to be a simulation.The weight of the cup in the hand, the aroma of the coffee poured into it, the sounds surrounding us – how can you fake such a wealth of experiences? But consider the progress made in computer technology over the past few decades.
Just some 40 years ago we had a Pong: two rectangles and a point. Today we have photorealistic 3D projects, which are simultaneously played by millions of gamers, and every year the technologies are getting better: sometimes developers make virtual universes almost indistinguishable from the world outside the window.If we assume that a similar rate of progress will be maintained, over time VR, if not replace, then at least significantly pressurize our real world.
In addition, elements of thinking are already built into individual programs that imitate human behavior. Of course, so far they are quite primitive and are based on elementary logic from the category “if … then …”. But who can guarantee that someday we will not witness the creation of virtual beings, endowed with full consciousness? Advances in understanding the principles of the human brain, as well as the vast computing resources that the development of quantum computing promises, are steadily bringing this moment closer.
Thus, it can be assumed that with the further development of technology, humanity will eventually launch a perfect simulation, inhabiting which intelligent agent beings (humans themselves or AI) will perceive it as an absolutely real world.
According to the aforementioned philosopher Nick Bostrom (as well as the notorious Elon Musk), such a scenario is almost inevitable. To prevent this from happening, we must either end our existence as a species (at best, go back to the Stone Age), or lose interest in computer technology in general.However, both, according to the American physicist George Smoot, are very unlikely. Undoubtedly, humanity persistently creates problems for itself – suffice it to mention global warming, growing stocks of nuclear weapons and the threat of mass extinction of species. But these problems will not necessarily lead to the destruction of the entire civilization.
And now, with this in mind, think: if such a development of technology is inevitable, then is it really impossible that some intelligent civilization somewhere in the Universe has already reached this stage earlier? And if so, it would be logical to assume that we just live inside an imitation, and not in the real world, because the probability of this is statistically higher: if we ourselves ever reach such a stage of technological development, then, obviously, we will not limit ourselves to one artificial The universe.Scientists will simultaneously conduct a huge number of simulations, the number of which will significantly exceed our only real world. And therefore, according to Elon Musk, the probability that we do not live in virtual reality is only “one multi-billion dollar”.
“It will be even better for us if it turns out that what we take for reality is a simulator that was created by another race or people of the future,” Musk notes.
Simulation is not a whim, but a scientific necessity
“Okay,” you might say, “let’s say some intelligence actually wrote the code for our universe.But why? What is the “profit” from the simulation of humanity? ”
Oddly enough, the answer to this question is quite simple. Just as gamers now love to play as themselves in The Sims, people of the future who have the ability to create complex simulations are likely to run simulations of the universe and humanity in particular purely for fun.
But video games are certainly not limited to the potential use of simulations. So, already today, for research purposes, scientists simulate various situations of interaction at various levels – from subatomic particles to human communities, galaxies and even universes.
For example, computer models of complex animal behavior help biologists understand how flocks and swarms form. Through simulations, astronomers learn how planets, stars and galaxies form. Sociologists and psychologists simulate human communities using relatively simple agents who make choices based on certain rules – such programs simulate cooperation between people, urban development, the functioning of traffic and the state economy, and many other social processes.This is not yet a prediction of the future (at the moment, simulations do not take into account all possible factors and therefore are rather arbitrary). But every year we are getting closer to him.
In addition, in the future, it is possible that scientists will use the simulation of the development of mankind also as a digital form of archeology, more or less reliably recreating the events of the past.
Now forget everything you know about computer technology, intelligent design, scientists, and video games.According to the second version of the Matrix hypothesis, even if the Universe is a simulation, it does not have to be programmed by some intelligent creature at all. Perhaps our physical world is really an illusion generated by the quantum “universe.”
Since the discovery of quantum mechanics in the 20th century, our objective reality, which we see and feel, the existence of which seems to us for granted, began to confuse scientists with seriously conflicting facts from the world of physics.Moreover, these paradoxes remain unresolved until now, and promising string and supersymmetry theories have not yet brought this cart anywhere.
But what is the quantum world? The quantum world is not a “matrix” in which the other world, which created ours, will be physical. This is not a human fantasy, since this virtuality existed long before man appeared. And this is not a phantom other world that affects ours. The quantum world is the real reality, which, as scientists assume, gave birth to a phantom in the form of our physical world.
From the point of view of our reality, the quantum world is illogical. Its laws seem strange and counterintuitive to us, since they violate common sense, the very foundations of our concept of the universe. So, many physical principles in the case of quantum mechanics simply stop working, and all our attempts to unify them have not been crowned with success.
Moreover, there simply cannot be a quantum world in the physical world. However, scientists say that believing that quantum states do not exist is like “ignoring that person behind the curtain.”
But even in the quantum world, our physical reality is impossible – unless it is virtual reality. Thus, scientists suggest that mysterious quantum processes are in fact the reason for the existence of our physical world and determine its properties.
So perhaps you are not only your brain trapped in a skull, but also an illusion created by quantum laws.
Criticism of the Simulation Hypothesis
Criticism is an integral part of any human knowledge that claims to be objective, so it would be illogical and simply unscientific to bypass it within the framework of this article.
As it was already said at the beginning of the article, there is nothing new in the interest in what may actually be behind the world accessible to us in sensations.
Thinkers have been asking these questions for many centuries, but every option they put forward for solving the problem of our existence is not devoid of significant flaws. The concept of “the world as a simulation” simply brings this old philosophical snag into a modern high-tech wrapper, and, alas, it also has a significant flaw.
As critics believe, such an interpretation of physical laws is just the most recent example of how humanity from time immemorial has interpreted the world around it, based on the latest achievements of technological progress. So, in the era of classical Newtonian mechanics, the universe was represented by a clockwork. And later, at the dawn of the computer era, DNA was considered as a kind of repository of a digital code with the function of storing and reading information.
So the Matrix hypothesis has every chance of being nothing more than an attempt to describe the Universe in terms of the achievements of humanity in the XXI century: “We are developing VR.I bet superintelligent beings would do it too, only their virtuality would be much cooler! “.
It is probably no coincidence that many proponents of the “all-encompassing simulation” idea admit that they read science fiction avidly in their youth. It is possible that the choice of reading predetermined their adult interest in the problems of extraterrestrial intelligence and now encourages them to clothe their reflections in the forms familiar to the genre.
So to speak, they seem to be viewing space through the window of the starship Enterprise from the American television series Star Trek.
Should we be worried that our world might turn out to be an illusion?
In short, no. Scientists note that for us the possible existence of the Matrix does not fundamentally change anything in the approach to the perception of the world. Reality, whatever it may be, will not change for us in any case. Yes, and we all know deep down in our hearts: the only definition of reality that is worth our attention is our immediate sensations and experiences, and not the hypothetical world that is hidden “behind the scenes.”
By the way, at the beginning of the 18th century, the English philosopher George Berkeley argued that the world is an illusion, to which his critic, the writer Samuel Johnson, exclaimed: “Here is my refutation!” – and kicked the stone. Did Johnson refute Berkeley with this? No. But his answer to such statements, apparently, was the most correct one possible.
Let’s summarize. So, do the above arguments prove that our universe is a simulation? Obviously not. So we don’t live in the Matrix? Also not, and at this place you must have felt disappointed.Like, how can it be: read-read, and the answer to the main question “Do we live in the Matrix?” never got it. However, this was expected, and here’s why.
For science, the simulation hypothesis is just one of many versions of being. Thinkers now have three boxes of such versions, and if they compete with each other, it is only in the minds of their supporters and opponents. That is, in fact, this is not yet knowledge, but guesses that do not pretend to be objective. As has often happened in history, reality can surprise and be completely different.But then why should we know about it?
It is well known that reliable knowledge, which has been confirmed experimentally, give people qualitative progress, moving our civilization forward in technological and intellectual terms, thanks to which we move step by step forward on the path of knowing the Universe.
Yes, the simulation hypothesis itself does not give us anything, since it is just a guess. But at the same time, it serves as a kind of beacon for humanity, which guides scientists along uncharted paths.Like many other paradoxes of philosophy, the Matrix hypothesis forces us to take a critical look at some ingrained ideas, isolate something new, important, but still not explored, and finally test it in practice. And the results of the experiments carried out – regardless of whether they refute the desired hypothesis or confirm – will give an impetus to an even broader understanding of the universe, as well as to new technologies that will certainly appear as a by-product on the path to achieving this knowledge.
So, if the hypothesis about the Matrix is ultimately refuted, then its refutation will certainly lead to the discovery of new laws and principles of the Universe, on the basis of which we can create new energies, spaceships, cars, robots for the exploration of other planets. And then humanity will leave the solar system, begin to move between galaxies, discover even larger star clusters and, perhaps, finally find life outside the Earth.
Otherwise, humanity will be convinced that it is pointless to study space, because we are in a virtual world.But then people will simply switch to another type of activity: scientists will start looking for a way to get out of virtual reality or look beyond it.
In any case, our civilization will definitely not stop in place. Because we humans are the real quintessence of curiosity.
Sources: WhatCulture, BBC (1, 2), Hi-News (1, 2), Naked Science, Lenta, Astronews90,000 How to choose electric guitar strings – news on the fender brand website.ru
Everything You Need To Know About The Fender Electric Guitar Strings Range
There is no doubt that strings affect the sound and playability of an electric guitar. Let’s face it, any guitar in your collection is just a percussion instrument if it doesn’t have strings on it.
When it comes to Fender electric guitar strings, there are a number of factors to consider when choosing a kit: the musical style in which you play, the regularity of your guitar playing, and the scale of your instrument.
These factors will determine the characteristics that differentiate the electric guitar strings from the Fender catalog:
- core type
- winding type
In this article, we’ll go into all the nuances you need to understand to help you choose the right strings for your Stratocaster, Telecaster , or any other electric guitar.
This parameter refers to the size of the string, or rather, its thickness, which is usually measured in thousandths of an inch.As a rule, in six-string kits, the gauges are listed in order from the high string “E” (high E) to the low and thick “E” (low E), respectively, the rest are listed in the order of B, G, D, A.
In general, small-gauge strings have a slightly brighter sound, are easier to play: they require less effort to press down and play bends, and they also put less stress on the neck.
On the other hand, thinner strings are quieter and have less sustain, and they tend to break more often.
This is not the case with thicker strings: they provide more sustain and loudness, and allow you to play aggressively and dynamically – these characteristics make them a good choice for playing in low or non-standard tunings. However, greater thickness also means increased pulling force and the need for additional force to apply pressure and pull-ups.
Experience has shown that thinner strings are the best choice for fast passages and complex chords (although thicker twisted strings should still be used for heavy styles using the “Drop D” tuning).Most blues and rock guitarists settle for medium calibers, which successfully combine the advantages of thin and thick strings, and jazz players tend to gravitate towards thick strings, sometimes even with a twisted third, because they practically do not use bends in their playing.
Here are the gauges used in the various Fender string kits (from thin E string to thick E string):
- “Extra Super Light”: .008 / .010 / .015 / .021 / .030 / .038
- “Light”:.009 / .011 / .016 / .024 / .032 / .042
- “Light-Regular”: .009 / .011 / .016 / .026 / .036 / .046
- “Regular”: .010 / .013 / .017 / .026 / .036 / .046
- “Regular Heavy”: .010 / .013 / .017 / .032 / .042 / .052
- “Medium”: .011 / .014 / .018 / .028 / .038 / .049
- “Heavy”: .012 / .016 / .024w / .032 / .042 / .052
Fender’s electric guitar strings are made of steel, so they optimally transmit the vibration energy to the magnetic pickup.The lower registers (E, A and D) can be wound in different alloys, while the smooth ones (G, B and E) are tinned.
Below are typical examples of materials used in the Fender line of strings:
- Nickel-Plated Steel: A popular combination that has the optimal sonic balance between brightness, warmth and speed of attack.
- Vintage Nickel: Quieter sounding than nickel plated steel.
- Stainless Steel: Very bright sound with excellent sustain and increased durability due to corrosion protection.
Most often, the cores are also made of steel. The core (or “core”) is the central element around which the winding is wound in order to increase the thickness of the string.
Modern models most often have hexagonal cores, since this design fixes the winding and thus stabilizes the action.
Roundwound strings use round wire that is wound around a core, while Flatwound strings use wire that looks more like ribbon.
Round wrapping is the most popular and therefore available in a wide variety of gauges and materials on the market.Round wound versions are said to have a brighter sound and longer sustain.
Favorite strings of jazz guitarists – flat-wound strings – give a pleasant feeling of smoothness and a softer tone. The smooth surface of such a winding makes playing the guitar somewhat easier.
Fender offers strings with two attachment options: Ball end and Bullet end.
Ball-ended strings can be used on all electric guitars. Their core is looped around a small metal element in the form of a ball (Ball), or rather, a ring. This method forms a V-shape with a “weak” core loop. Under normal tension, this loop will stretch out, preventing the ring from completely abutting the holder.
The “Bullet end” type has small bronze cylinder tips that are rigidly attached to the end.With this design, there are no loops and sagging – the working part of the tip adjoins the tailpiece more closely and tightly. Consequently, the high-precision design of the bullet tip ensures that the string returns to its original position, which significantly improves tuning stability even after heavy use of the tremolo.
This type of tip was specially designed for the Stratocaster, because it is the “bullet” that provides the most reliable fixation of the string in the sustain block and its tight fit in accordance with the shape of the channel, thus increasing the sustain.
How can you maintain your strings?
Electric guitar strings are made of steel, and steel contains iron, which corrodes in the presence of oxygen. Of course, this is not a quick process, but moisture in the air and handprints can speed it up significantly.
Fortunately, you can extend the lifespan by regular cleaning. For this, a special cleaner in combination with a special cloth, or a simple polishing cloth, is quite suitable.Fender also offers a dedicated Speed Slick applicator that allows you to restore cleanliness and prolong life in just a few strokes.
Finally, remember to wash your hands before playing the guitar to keep the strings as little harmful as possible.
And below are the signs that mean it’s time to change the strings:
- The formation has become unstable.
- Strings have noticeable corrosion.
- The guitar started to sound dull.
- The braid has lost its integrity.
If you want to learn how to properly change strings on an electric guitar, watch the tutorial video below:
There is a big plus in such a variety – it is the choice. A great way to find out which is best for you is to try several different options and settle on the one that works best for you.
Once you’ve found the optimal strings, all you have to do is monitor their condition regularly so that your sound is always excellent.
Back to news list Next news
Classic fastening of strings on a guitar stand
Consider installing nylon strings using a classic pigtail attachment and one hole for each string. Attaching strings to guitar tuners in separate article
In this article, we will discuss in detail how to tie strings.We will also learn some principles that are important to remember so that the strings do not come loose or unravel gradually.
I must say right away that we will consider fastening strings on a stand using two holes for each string in a separate article, and in a separate article fastening with beads.
So we are considering a simple but tricky knot.
You yourself have tied the usual knot for attaching nylon strings more than once, you can imagine it well and you can see it in the first photo.It’s simple.
This method is used everywhere. The knot is easily and clearly formed, push the string into the hole, wrap the tail around the base from either side and thread it into the loop. Like a regular knot. But there are a couple of points to pay attention to.
Incorrect stringing and two golden rules
The first rule of good installation:
In order for the string to be held securely, the end of the string must be brought over the edge of the string-holding socket.
Incorrect fixing of the strings on the stand I see all the time. It doesn’t matter what qualifications the guitarist has. Moreover, the slipping of the string due to the edge can occur with a slight loosening during pulling. Those. the guitarist ties everything correctly, but then, when he turns his attention to tightening the strings on the tuning machine, he weakens the string, the knot opens a little, and this is enough for the tail to pop out.
We look at the wrong engagement in the photos, which are even posted on photo services.
In the photo above, you can clearly see that the 6th and 4th strings were tied incorrectly when the tails of all other strings are thrown over the bone edge. Although there is an interesting fact that the tails of the wrong strings are pushed under the adjacent string. More photos.
The one who understood everything from the above, in this photo sees the wrong fastening of the 6th, 4th, 3rd and 2nd strings. Very bad – only two out of six, four penalties! And there are no knots.
The insidiousness of the situation lies in the fact that such an unfinished knot will hold for some time, and for bass strings with a gimp, it is possible that even for a long time.But I recommend that you do not tempt fate, because if it pops up it will be ugly and painful.
But that’s not all, there is the second rule , which is better to follow when setting the strings:
The first and second strings of the guitar must have a knot that will prevent the string from slipping out.
Oh, never slipped out! What are you talking about!
Never slipped out, because everything is up to the first time. As the string unfolds, it hits the soundboard with such force that if your guitar is lacquered, not lacquered, it will punch a decent ditch or dent.
Thin and soft strings slip, and these are not cheap carbon sets.
How to Install Guitar Strings Correctly
Let’s repeat two rules for those who, instead of reading, run through the article – I play the “Aranjuez” concert with an orchestra, so that I, yes, do not know how to tie the strings! However:
- Tie knots on the first and second strings of the guitar.
- When weaving the strings around the stand, we put the end of the string behind the edge of the string-holding socket (red line in the photo below).This is what wedges the string.
The first, second and fourth strings are best braided several times before starting over the hem.
Also a few turns, but slightly on the other side.
The version for thick strings differs in that they can be immediately wound over the edge. This is especially true for the sixth string.
The number of threads or turns can be correlated with the width of the string-supporting socket of the stand.The first thin string allows you to make several turns without any clutter. In this case, the knot will not spontaneously dissolve when the tension is released, and the additional knot will itself go beyond the corner of the stand.
Do not leave the tails of the strings too long – they can scratch the deck at the same time these tails are necessary if you still do not tie additional knots.